When a man has that kind of a wife—and no man can be so afflicted

without knowing it—he does a criminal thing when he leaves his girls to

their mother’s influence. It is his bounden duty to use his influence

to correct hers as far as possible. Little as men seem to realize it,

children nearly always listen with far more respect to what their

fathers say than they do to what their mothers say. For the child knows

intuitively that the father has had a broader experience of life than

the mother has. It knows that the father goes out into the world and

does battle with it every day and that he knows from experience the

things about which mother vaguely theorizes. It knows that father knows

the rules and how to play the game.

Hence when a man really makes any attempt to develop his children’s

characters he finds them as clay in his hands, ready to respond to his

slightest touch. It is only when father merely uses his influence as a

veto power that it is negligible. That a boy needs his father’s hand

in directing and controlling him at the critical time of his life and

a father’s wisdom to steer him along the right course is universally

recognized, but I often think that a girl needs it even more. For a

girl needs to be taught the things that life teaches a man. She needs

to be taught to be straightforward and honest and to live up to her

contracts, that she must give as well as take in life and that she must

have the courage and the grit to carry on when things are hard instead

of turning quitter and to make the best of a bad bargain. Many a

divorce would have been avoided and many a home that is now broken up,

kept intact if a father’s influence over his little girl had made her a

good sport, instead of mother’s influence developing a yellow streak in

her.

A mother’s influence is a great thing, but it needs to be backed up by

father’s. That is why God gave every child two parents instead of one.

LXV

THE RICHES OF POOR CHILDREN

The bitterest cry of poor people is that they have nothing to give

their children. The fathers and mothers who cannot buy imported finery

for their girls or sports-model cars for their boys and send them off

to expensive colleges and fill their pockets with money feel that they

have come empty-handed to their children and have nothing to give them.

Yet the poorest man and woman who bend above a cradle have it in their

power to bestow upon their babe treasures so great that their worth

cannot be computed in dollars and cents, and that will bring the child

more pleasure and happiness in life than they could purchase with all

the wealth of the Rothschilds. For there is no price tag on the most

precious things in the world. They are equally free to prince and

pauper, and more often the beggar gets them than the millionaire does.

For example, there is love—a close, intimate, personal association—and

tenderness and understanding. Poor parents can more easily give to

their children than the wealthy can. And the child that has them is

rich beyond the dreams of avarice, and the child that has them not

is poverty-stricken, although it has all else besides. The mother who

rocks her baby to sleep on her breast, whose tender arms are always

outstretched to gather her youngsters to her heart, who is never too

tired or too busy to listen to childish confidences, who surrounds

her little ones with a brooding atmosphere of affection,—gives to her

children far more than does the rich mother who gives her children

nurses and governesses and pony carts and fine clothes and costly

playthings but who does not give them herself; who bestows on them

everything but the things that a child wants most and needs most—mother

love and tenderness, the real mother touch.

Not long ago a very rich young man figured in a disgraceful scandal,

and the one excuse offered in his defense was that his mother was dead

and his father had never given him anything except money. He had never

had any affection bestowed upon him. He had had no parental guidance.

When a little lad he had been put in a school and kept there without

even being visited by any one who loved him, without even going home

for vacations. He had been just a pitiful little millionaire waif for

whom nobody cared. The lot of such a child is infinitely worse than

that of the one whose parents are in such humble circumstances that

they can give it perhaps only the plainest of food and clothes, but who

do give it a real home that is full of close, warm family life. The

fathers and mothers to whom children are grateful and whose memories

they revere are not those who bequeath them great fortunes, but those

who leave them the memory of a love and understanding that never failed

and of a childhood that was made sweet by their parents’ cherishing.

No matter how poor you are, you can give your children love and

companionship and the privilege of growing up in a peaceful and

cheerful home, and that is something that few rich parents can give

their children.

Another gift that you can make your children is that of teaching them

how to read. When you do that you really don’t need to do much more

for them, because you have put a magic coin in their hands that will

buy them entrance into all the doors of delight and open to them all

of the portals of romance. No one who loves to read can ever be bored

or lonely. He or she has only to open a book, and, presto, he or she

has for company all of the wit and wisdom of the ages. Gay adventures,

beautiful ladies and gallant gentlemen beckon, and one has only to

follow them into realms of enchantment. All of interest, all that

informs, that thrills, that amuses, is the property of the reader.

But, reading does not always come by nature, as Dogberry thought it

did. Often it has to be acquired by art, but any child can be taught

to like to read; it can be given the reading habit, and no other gift

can possibly be bestowed upon it that is half so valuable or that will

bring it in such happiness or that will be such an ark of refuge to it

in times of trouble.

Another gift that the poorest parents can make to their children is to

teach them how to see. Most persons go through the world as blind as

bats. They never see anything that isn’t directly under their noses,

and thereby they miss half of the fun and pleasure in living. There

are men and women to whom a sunset is just a phenomenon of nature that

happens every day; to whom a crowd is just a jam of people; who get

nothing out of travel but inconvenience and missing the particular kind

of breakfast food they prefer, and who loathe rain because they get

their feet wet and hate snow because it is messy. And there are other

men and women who see the glory of God in every flaming sunset; who

thrill to the finger tips at the drama they see enacted in every crowd;

to whom travel opens up a new world; to whom every rain is a symphony

and every snowstorm a poem.

Which of these get the most out of life—those who see or those who are

blind; those who can get pleasure out of little things or those who are

too dull and dumb to amuse themselves; those who are sensitive to every

beauty in nature, who appreciate music and art and literature, who get

the last flavor out of good cooking, or those who find everything flat

and stale and uninteresting because they have never been taught to see

the under side of things?

Finally, the poorest parents can teach their children that brave

attitude toward life without which all the balance is cinders, ashes,

and dust. For disappointments and trouble come to us all, and it is

only those who have been taught how to make the best of their bad

bargains, how to laugh at misfortune and mock at fate, who achieve any

real happiness in life. So cheer up, you parents who complain that you

have nothing to give your children. You can give them love. You can

teach them to read and to see things. You can give them a brave heart.

These gifts are worth more than money. And nobody can take them away

from those who have them.

LXVI

A MAN’S RIGHT TO HIS HOME

It is a matter of continual wonder to me that women do not realize

how unjustly they treat their husbands about their homes. Of course,

a woman’s home is her castle and all that, and it is right and proper

that she should be the ruler of it. Moreover, inasmuch as the average

man is in his home only a very few of his waking hours, while his wife

spends practically all of her time in it, it is more important that it

should come up to her ideal and fire her fancy than his. She should

have the right of choice in selecting the neighborhood she desires to

live in, because she has to know the people next door and look across

the street all day, and he doesn’t. Nor should any mere husband presume

to dictate about the number, size, and arrangements of the closets

in a house that is going to be his wife’s workshop. Nor should a man

interfere with his wife’s taste in decoration, no matter how much it

runs to putting ruffled petticoats on the furniture and installing

forests of floor lamps, for having a home dolled up as she wants it,

fills a woman with a great and exceeding peace and joy, and no good

husband should withhold this pleasure from his wife.

But all that does not give the wife the right to monopolize the home

and use it for her sole behoof and benefit, as so many women think it

does. The man who pays the freight, the man who buys the house and who

supports it, should have a few poor, simple privileges in it which even

a wife should recognize and respect. He should at least, in all common

fairness, have the status of a star boarder in the home his money keeps

a going concern. He seldom does, however. There is not one home in a

thousand where the man of the house has even a room of his own which

he can furnish in accordance with his own taste and where he can mess

around as much as he likes.

I have known many men who tried to establish dens for themselves

in their houses, but before they got fairly settled, with their

collections of stamps or fishing rods or stuffed animals or what-not

disposed around them, their wives decided that it would be just the

place for a sewing room or the nursery. Three hooks in a closet and a

couple of drawers in a chiffonier are about all most men get for their

private use in their homes, and at that they generally find that their

wives and daughters have superimposed feminine fripperies over their

best suits and parked their silk stockings on top of their shirts. So

universal is the feeling among women they have a right to the entire

house that when a wife does concede an easy chair and a reading lamp

to her husband she boasts of it loudly and calls everybody’s attention

to her unusual and generous gesture, whereat all marvel. And even her

husband himself puffs out his chest and feels that he is a pampered

household pet.

Why women should feel that they have an exclusive right to exercise

the hospitality of the home nobody knows, but they do. If you will

observe you will see that in most homes it is the wife’s family who are

perpetually billeted in the spare bedroom, while the husband’s family

makes few and occasional visits. You will also observe that there are

ten men who have their mothers-in-law living with them to one man whose

mother resides under his roof. Any wife would think it very mean in

him if her husband did not extend a cordial welcome to Aunt Sally and

Cousin Sue when they were invited for a visit and if he wasn’t willing

to have her pretty young sister come and stay indefinitely in town with

them so as to have the benefits of the city. And she expects him to

register great joy when her mother telegraphs that she is coming for a

month or two.

But it is another pair of sleeves when it comes to a husband’s

relatives, and there are precious few men who would dare to dump a

bunch of their kinspeople on their wives. Many a man is afraid to ask

even his own mother to come to see him. The average husband would

fall dead with surprise if his wife ever intimated to him that she

considered the fact that he paid for the rent and food and light and

heat and general upkeep of the home gave him just as much right to have

his family stay with them as she had to have hers.

As to the friends who come to the house, the wife considers it her

prerogative to settle that little matter by herself and thinks that her

husband has nothing to do with it. She spreads the mat with “Welcome”

on it for those she likes and slams and bolts the door in the faces

of those she doesn’t fancy. And she practically never fancies her

husband’s old friends. So the man who had looked forward to having

his old friends in his new home, who had dreamed of long talks with

Tom by his fireside and to having Bob, who was closer than a brother,

drop in at any time for pot-luck finds, somehow, not only that they

do not come, but that he is afraid to ask them to come. Wives are

always complaining that their husbands are not willing to stay at

home. Perhaps the remedy is making the home a democracy instead of an

autocracy. If men had more rights and privileges at home they might

like staying in it better.

LXVII

DEVOURING FRIENDS

“One of the greatest pests in the world is what I call the devouring

friend,” said a woman the other day. “She is a bloodthirsty cannibal

who gobbles you up alive, and you have no way of protecting yourself

against her, because the sacred name of friendship bars the use of all

the lethal weapons that you can use in defending yourself against other

bores and social nuisances.

“Of course, the common or garden variety of devouring friend is the one

who literally eats you out of house and home. She is a self-invited

guest who drops you a little note saying that she is passing through

your city or that she has to have a little dental work done or wants

to consult a doctor or do some shopping, and she does so pine to see

her darling Susan and talk over old times, and will it be convenient

for her to come and spend a few days with you? All of which being

translated simply means that she desires to graft a hotel bill off you.

“Anyway, she comes and camps in your spare room by the week, because

she always manages to string out the dental work or the appointments

with the doctor or the milliner. She should worry. For she is having

a good time at no expense. Furthermore, by hints and insinuations she

inveigles your husband into taking her to places of amusement that you

have not felt that you could afford even when there were only two of

you to pay for. And she runs your grocery bill up to the skies because

she develops a taste for the most expensive food. And as you see her

calmly consuming the price of your new dress you know exactly how a

cornfield feels when a swarm of seven-year locusts settles down on it

and goes into action.

“Then there are the devouring friends who eat up your time. I am a busy

woman. I cannot afford to waste a minute. Unfortunately for me, I have

a number of women friends who are rich and whose principal occupation

in life is killing time. Now, these women know perfectly well that

I not only do all of my own housework but that I make my children’s

clothes and that if they kill a morning for me they upset my whole

schedule and make my work pile up upon me so that my labor is twice as

hard.

“But does that keep them from interrupting me? Lord, no. Every time

Maud has a spat with her mother-in-law she will drop over and spend a

whole morning giving me all the harrowing details. Every time Lulu’s

husband gives her a new limousine I have to waste hours of my valuable

time listening to a minute description of all its splendor. Every time

Sallie and Susie want to be sympathized with or want to brag about

their children they ruin the heart of a day’s work for me by backing me

up against a wall and making me listen. And a dozen times a day I am

interrupted by women who call me up over the telephone to hold long and

fruitless conversations about nothing.

“Yet there is no possible way to protect my precious time against

these friends who eat it up. They are all charming women. They like me

and I like them. I want to retain their friendship, so I cannot shut

my door in their faces when they come to see me. I can’t ask them to

leave when they stay too long. I can’t ring off when they call me over

the telephone. I can’t even say ‘damn’ aloud, no matter how much I

am thinking it. But I know what the cynic meant when he said that if

God would save him from his friends he would protect himself from his

enemies.

“Then there are the devouring friends who swallow up all of your

home life. My husband’s business is such that he has only one or two

evenings at home a week. We would like to have these to ourselves to

keep up our acquaintance or to go out on a little spree together. We

have proclaimed this fact loudly and long to our friends and we refuse

every invitation that it is possible to get out of for those two sacred

occasions. But it doesn’t do a particle of good.

“Being an unusually charming and entertaining individual, my husband is

regarded by my friends as a social tidbit—a particularly savory _hors

d’œuvre_, as it were—and they gobble up our evenings together without

the slightest compunction. If we won’t go to them, all right. They will

come to us. So just about the time we are settling down for a real

heart-to-heart talk, here come the Smiths to pass a pleasant evening

with us, or the Joneses descend upon us and bear us off, shrieking and

protesting, to listen to their new radio, or the Thompsons telephone

that they are just coming over for a game of bridge.

“And there are the other devouring friends who nibble away at our

independence like a mouse at a cheese, until some day we suddenly wake

up to the fact that our freedom is all gone. We haven’t a vestige of

liberty left. We dare not give a party and leave them out. We have

to explain to them everything we do and tag meekly along in their

footsteps. And there are other devouring friends who gnaw constantly

on our sympathies by telling us all of their troubles and making us

bear their burdens for them. They are ghouls who make us feed them our

hearts to satisfy their morbid appetite for pity. Perhaps there is no

way to get rid of devouring friends, but it certainly would add to

the pleasures of life if we could swat them as we do other household

pests.”

LXVIII

THE SECRET OF HAPPINESS

What is the secret of happiness? I once asked Mary Anderson this

question and she replied: “To find out what you want of life, and then

to have the courage to take it. I wanted quiet, seclusion, home and

husband and children, the ordinary domestic life of woman,” she went

on. “I had the courage to leave the stage at the very height of my

career. And I have had the courage to refuse every offer to go back,

no matter how dazzling it was. I have also had the courage to stay in

my sleepy little village and refuse to let myself be drawn into the

brilliant whirl of London society. I have been happy because I knew

what I wanted, and I have been brave enough to take it in spite of all

temptations to be led into doing the things that I did not want to do.”

Undoubtedly this is one of the answers to the great riddle that we

are always asking and that so few solve. A great many people are

unhappy because they do not really know what they want. They have no

clear vision of the thing they are seeking. They are torn between

conflicting desires and never settle down to any one thing, and find

contentment and peace in that. You see this exemplified in the men who

are always changing from one occupation to another, and who work with

their minds on their golf and play golf with their minds on their work.

You see it in the women who are fretful and peevish wives and mothers,

complaining of the burdens of domesticity and feeling that they have

missed happiness in not following some career, and in the women who

have followed careers and who are always bemoaning their loneliness

because they have no families. Yet how seldom do the disgruntled, who

lament their fate in life so loudly, have the courage to face about and

take the road that they at least believe leads to happiness! We behold

so many idle tears that we are inclined to believe there are vast

numbers of human beings who get a kind of morbid pleasure out of misery.

But what is the secret of happiness? I give four guesses at the

conundrum. The first is work, to keep so busy that we do not have

leisure to think whether we are happy or not. There is no other

pleasure comparable to the clean joy of being swallowed up in some

useful, constructive work that calls forth every power of mind

and body. Your own job, that you do competently, has for you a

never-failing interest, a perpetual thrill that nothing else in

the world can give. Only brainless idiots are content to loaf.

Intelligent, thinking men and women must keep busy in order to be happy.

My second guess is that happiness is the bird in the hand and not the

bird in the bush. If we are ever to be happy we must be happy now at

the present moment. We cannot put it off until to-morrow. You are

always hearing people say that they are going to do this and that when

they get rich, that they are going to travel when they are old, they

are going to play, they are going to take up old acquaintances, they

are going to enjoy themselves five, ten, twenty years hence. But when

the time comes that they have set to be happy in, they find that they

have lost their capacity for enjoyment. Those who have inched and

pinched and sweated every penny trying to accumulate a fortune have

formed such a habit of parsimony that it is agony to them to spend

money. Those who have denied themselves too much have lost all desire.

Those who have stayed at home too long have become such a fixture on

Main Street that they are lonesome and homesick everywhere else.

So the happy men and women are those who take the goods the gods

provide each hour. They make a reasonable provision against the rainy

day, and then they indulge themselves in the good clothes, the pretty

home, the comfortable car, the palatable food, the little trips that

are within their reach. They do not put off every pleasure until some

mythical, problematic day, when they will be able to live in a palace

and have a Rolls-Royce and Paris clothes and when they will be too

old and rheumatic and set in their ways to want to do anything but

sit by the fire in their own familiar chair. Never was there sounder

philosophy conveyed than in the old comic opera ditty which said, “I

want what I want when I want it,” and if we don’t take it then, it is

dust and ashes in our teeth.

Happiness consists in simple things. We are always envying the rich and

great, and think how happy they must be, but we might well pity them,

for they have far more sources of sorrow than we have. Beyond a modest

competence, riches are a burden, and money can become a curse that

blights every natural joy. The millionaire is cut off from the greatest

of all happiness—that of knowing himself loved for himself alone. He

suspects the motive of every friend, he does not even trust the woman

he marries, and he knows his wealth to be a blight upon his children.

The real source of happiness is in enjoying simple things—a gorgeous

sunset, a beautiful landscape, a clever book, a good dinner, the talk

of a friend, the unfaltering love of husband or wife, a baby’s arms

around your neck, a fine son and daughter filling you with pride and

joy. These have no price tag on them. They may belong just as much to

the poor man as the rich man. Indeed, they oftener do.

Finally, remember the song, “I Want to Be Happy, but I Can’t Be

Happy Till I Make You Happy, Too.” In unselfishness, in doing good to

others—that is the real answer to the secret of how to be happy.

LXIX

PREPAREDNESS FOR OLD AGE

What are you storing up for your old age? Are you laying up any money

against the time when you will be old and feeble and no longer able to

work? The hour will strike for you, as it does for others, when your

earning powers will be gone. Your hands will be too stiff and clumsy

to keep on with their accustomed task. Your mind will be too slow to

go the pace in the fierce competition in the commercial world. If you

are an employee, you will lose your job. If you are a business man, you

will find that your trade has somehow drifted away from you. If you are

a professional man, you will be superseded by the new men whose stars

are just rising on the horizon.

Dorothy Dix—her book · 第 16 / 17 段