TRAGEDY ON THE STAGE.

The tendency of the stage is to present practical, everyday affairs in

plays, and those are the most successful which are the most natural. The

shoeing of a horse on the stage in a play attracts the attention of the

audience wonderfully, and draws well. The inner workings of a brewery, or

a mill, is a big card, but there is hardly enough tragedy about it. If

they could run a man or two through the wheel, and have them cut up into

hash, or have them drowned in a beer vat, audiences could applaud as they

do when eight or nine persons are stabbed, poisoned or beheaded in the

Hamlets and Three Richards, where corpses are piled up on top of each

other.

What the people want is a compromise between old tragedy and new comedy.

Now, if some manager could have a love play, where the heroine goes into a

slaughter house to talk love to the butcher, instead of a blacksmith shop

or a brewery, it would take. A scene could be set for a slaughter house,

with all the paraphernalia for killing cattle, and supe butchers to stand

around the star butcher with cleavers and knives.

The star butcher could sit on a barrel of pigs' feet, or a pile of heads

and horns, and soliloquize over his unrequitted love, as he sharpened a

butcher knife on his boot. The hour for slaughtering having arrived,

cattle could be driven upon the stage, the star could knock down a steer

and cut its throat, and hang it up by the hind legs and skin it, with the

audience looking on breathlessly.

As he was about to cut open the body of the dead animal, the orchestra

could suddenly break the stillness, and the heroine could waltz out from

behind a lot of dried meat hanging up at one side, dressed in a lavender

satin princess dress, _en train_, with a white reception hat with ostrich

feathers, and, wading through the blood of the steer on the

carpet, shout, "Stay your hand, Reginald!"

The star butcher could stop, wipe his knife on his apron, motion to the

supe butchers to leave, and he would take three strides through the blood

and hair, to the side of the heroine, take her by the wrist with his

bloody hand, and shout, "What wiltest thou, Mary Anderson de Montmorence?"

Then they could sit down on a box of intestines and liver and things and

talk it over, and the curtain could go down with the heroine swooning in

the arms of the butcher.

[Illustration: JOHN MCCULLOUGH KILLING A TEXAS STEER.]

Seven years could elapse between that act and the next, and a scene could

be laid in a boarding house, and some of the same beef could be on the

table, and all that. Of course we do not desire to go into details. We are

no play writer, but we know what takes. People have got tired of

imitation blood on the stage. They kick on seeing a man killed in one act,

and come out as good as new in the next. Any good play writer can take the

cue from this article and give the country a play that will take the

biscuit.

Imagine John McCullough, or Barrett, instead of killing Roman supes with

night gowns on, and bare legs, killing a Texas steer. There's where you

would get the worth of your money. It would make them show the metal

within them, and they would have to dance around to keep from getting a

horn in their trousers. It does not require any pluck to go out behind the

scenes with a sword and kill enough supes for a mess.

Peck's Compendium of Fun Comprising the Choicest Gems of Wit, Humor, Sarcasm and Pathos of America's Favorite Humorist · 第 139 / 191 题