First of all, though, what has the story of Judith to do with mythology?

It is a legend, one of the finest of Semitic legends; and between legend

and myth there is as great a gulf as between Jew and Greek. I believe

there are no myths proper to Israel--I do not see how such magnificent

egoists could contract to the necessary state of awe--and I do not know

that there are any legends proper to Greece which are divorced from real

myths. For where a myth is the incarnation of the spirit of natural fact,

a legend is the embellishment of an historical event: a very different

thing. A natural fact is permanent and elemental, an historical event is

transient and superficial. Take one instance out of a score. The rainbow

links heaven and earth. Iris then, to the myth-making Greek, was Jove's

messenger, intermediary between God and Man. That is to incarnate a

constant, natural fact. Plato afterwards, making her daughter of Thaumas,

incarnated a fact, psychological, but none the less constant, none the

less natural. But to say, as the legend-loving Jew said, that Noah floated

his ark over a drowning world and secured for his posterity a standing

covenant with God, Who then and once for all set His bow in the heavens;

that is to indicate, somewhere, in the dim backward and abysm of time, an

historical event. The rainbow is suffered as the skirt of the robe of

Noah, who was an ancestor of Israel. So the Judith poem may be a decorated

event, or it may be the barest history in a splendid epical setting: the

point to remember is that it cannot be, as legend, a subject for creative

art. The artist, in the language of Neo-Platonism, is a demiurge; he only

of men can convert dead things into life. And now we will go into the

Uffizi.

Mr. Ruskin, in his petulant-playful way, has touched upon the feeling of

amaze most people have who look for the first time at Botticelli's

_Judith_ tripping smoothly and lightly over the hill-country, her

steadfast maid dogging with intent patient eyes every step she takes. You

say it is flippant, affected, pedantic. For answer, I refer you to the

sage himself, who, from his point of view--that painting may fairly deal

with a chapter of history--is perfectly right. The prevailing strain of

the story is the strength of weakness--_ex dulci fortitude_, to

invert the old enigma. "O God, O my God, hear me also, a widow. Break down

their stateliness by the hand of a woman!" It is the refrain that runs

through the whole history of Israel, that reasonable complacency of a

little people in their God-fraught destiny. And, withal, a streak of

savage spite: that the audacious oppressor shall be done scornfully to

death. There is the motive of Jael and Sisera too. So "she smote twice

upon his neck with all her might, and she took away his head from him, and

tumbled his body down from the bed." Ho! what a fate for the emissary of

the Great King. Wherefore, once more, the jubilant paradox, "The Lord hath

smitten him by the hand of a woman!" That is it: the amazing, thrilling

antithesis insisted on over and over again by the old Hebrew bard. "Her

sandals ravished his eyes, her beauty took his mind prisoner, and the

fauchion passed through his neck." That is the _leit-motif_: Sandro

the poet knew it perfectly well and taught it, to the no small comfort of

Mr. Ruskin and his men. Giuditta, dainty, blue-eyed, a girl still and

three years a widow, flits homeward through a spring landscape of grey and

green and the smile of a milky sky, being herself the dominant of the

chord, with her bough of slipt olive and her jagged scimitar, with her

pretty blue fal-lals smocked and puffed, and her yellow curls floating

over her shoulders. On her slim feet are the sandals that ravished his

eyes; all her maiden bravery is dancing and fluttering like harebells in

the wind. Behind her plods the slave-girl folded in an orange scarf,

bearing that shapeless, nameless burden of hers, the head of the grim Lord

Holofernes. Oh, for that, it is the legend itself! For look at the girl's

eyes. What does their dreamy solemnity mean if not, "the Lord hath smitten

him by the hand of a woman"? One other delicate bit of symbolising he has

allowed himself, which I may not omit. You are to see by whom this deed

was done: by a woman who has unsexed herself. Judith is absorbed in her

awful service; her robe trails on the ground and clings about her knees;

she is unconscious of the hindrance. The gates of Bethulia are in sight,

the Chaldean horsemen are abroad, but she has no anxiety to escape. She is

swift because her life just now courses swiftly; but there is no haste.

The maid, you shall mark, picks up her skirts with careful hand, and steps

out the more lustily for it.

So far Botticelli the poet, and so far also Mr. Ruskin, reader of

pictures. What says Botticelli the painter? Had he no instincts to tell

him that his art could have little to say to a legend? Or that a legend

might be the subject of an epic (here, indeed, was an epic ready made),

might, under conditions, be the subject of a drama; but could not, under

any conditions, be alone the subject of a picture? I don't for a moment

suggest that he had, or that any artist ever goes to work in this double-

entry, methodical way; but are we entitled to say that he was not

influenced by his predilections, his determinations as a draughtsman, when

he squared himself to illustrate the Bible? We say that the subject of a

picture is the spirit of natural fact. If Botticelli was a painter,

_that_ is what he must have looked for, and must have found, in every

picture he painted. Where, then, was he to get his natural facts in the

story of Judith? What is, in that story, the natural, essential (as

opposed to the historical, fleeting) fact? It is murder. Judith's deed was

what the old Scots law incisively calls _slauchter_. It may be

glossed over as assassination or even execution--in fact, in Florence,

where Giuliano was soon to be taken off, it did not fail to be so called:

it remains, however, just murder. Botticelli, not shirking the position at

all, judged murder to be a natural fact, and its spirit or essence

swiftness and stealth. Chaucer, let us note, had been of the same mind:

"The smyler with the kayf under his cloke,"

and so on, in lines not to be matched for hasty and dreadful suggestion.

Swiftness and stealth, the ambush, the averted face and the sudden stab,

are the standing elements of murder: pare off all the rest, you come down

to that. Your staring looks, your blood, your "chirking," are accidentals.

They may be there (for each of us carries a carcase), but the horror of

sudden death is above them: a man may strangle with his thoughts cleaner

than with his pair of hands. And as "matter" is but the stuff wherewith

Nature works, and she is only insulted, not defied, when we flout or

mangle it, so it is against the high dignity of Art to insist upon the

carrion she must use. She will press, here the terror, there the radiance,

of essential fact; she will leave to us, seeing it in her face, to add

mentally the poor stage properties we have grown to trust. No blood, if

you please. Therefore, in Botticelli's _Judith_, nothing but the

essentials are insisted on; the rest we instantly imagine, but it is not

there to be sensed. The panel is in a tremor. So swift and secret is

Judith, so furtive the maid, we need no hurrying horsemen to remind us of

her oath,--"Hear me, and I will do a thing which shall go throughout all

generations to the children of our nation." Sudden death is in the air;

nature has been outraged. But there is no drop of blood--the thin scarlet

line along the sword-edge is a symbol if you will--the pale head in the

cloth is a mere "thing": yet we all know what has been done. Mr. Ruskin is

wrong to dwell here upon the heroism of the heroine, the beneficence of

the crime, the exhilaration of the patriot; he is traducing the painter by

so praising the poet All those things may be there; and why should they

not? But it is a pity to insist upon them until you have no space for the

pictorial something which is there too, and makes the picture.

Other _Judiths_ there are; two here, one next door in the Pitti, any

number scattered over the galleries of Europe. There are Jacopo Palma of

Venice and Allori of Florence who used the old story, the one to

perpetuate a fat blonde, the other a handsome actress in a "strong"

situation; there is Sodoma; there are Horace Vernet and the moderns, the

Wests and Haydons of our grandfathers. It is a pet subject of the Salon.

These men have vulgarised an epic, and smirched poetry and painting alike

for the sake of a tawdry sensation. But enough: let us look at one more.

Mantegna's is worth looking at. It is a pen drawing, often repeated, best

known by the fine engraving he finally made of it. I think it Is the best

murder picture in the world. To begin with, the literary interest of the

story is practically gone. This wild, terrible, beautiful woman may be

Judith if you choose: she might be Medea or Agave, or Salome, or the

Lucrezia Borgia of popular fancy and Donizetti. The fact is she is part of

a scheme whose object is the æsthetic aspect of murder--murder considered

by one of the fine arts. Andrea was able, and I know not that anybody else

of his day could have been able, to contemplate murder purely objectively,

with no thought of its ethical relations. Botticelli had been fired by the

heroism and the moral grandeur of the special circumstances of a given

case: down they went into his picture with what rightly belonged to it.

There is none of that here. And Mantegna makes other distinctions in the

field common to both of them. Murder, for him, did not essentially subsist

in its shocking suddenness; it held something more specific, a witchery of

its own, a _macabre_ fascination, a mystery. Lionardo felt it when he

drew his _Medusa_; Shelley wrote it down "the tempestuous loveliness

of terror." Thus it had, for Mantegna, an unique emotional habit which set

it off from other vice and gave it a positive, appreciable, æsthetic value

of its own. With even more unerrancy than Botticelli, he gripped the

adjectival and qualifying function of his art. He saw that crime, too, had

its pictorial side. When Keats, writing of the Lamia sloughing her snake-

folds, tells us how--

"She writhed about, convulsed--with scarlet pain";

or when, of organ music, he says--

"Up aloft

The silver, snarling trumpets 'gan to chide,"

he is simply, in his own art and with his proper methods, getting

precisely the same kind of effect; he is incarnating the soul of a fact.

And so Mantegna, with his Roman kindness for whatever had breath and

vigour and boldness of design, carved his _Judith_ on the lines of a

Vestal Virgin, and gave her the rapt, dæmonic features of the Tragic Muse.

And, with his full share of that unhealthy craving for the mere nastiness

of crime, that Aminatrait which distinguished the later Empire and its

correlate the Renaissance, he drew together the elements of his picture to

express an eminently characteristic conception of curious murder. What

amplitude of outline; what severe grace of drapery! And what mad

affectation of attention to the ghastly baggage she is preparing for her

flight! I can only instance for a parallel the pitiful case of the young

Ophelia, decked with flowers and weeds, and faltering in her pretty treble

songs about lechery and dead bodies. It needs strong men to do these

things; men who have lived out all that the world can offer them of heaven

and hell, and, with the tolerance of maturity, are in the mind to see

something worth a thought in either. There is in murder something more

horrible than blood,--the spirit that breeds blood and plays with it. M.

Jan van Beers and his kindred of the dissecting-room and accidents'-ward

are passed by Mantegna, who gives no vulgar illusion of gaping wounds and

jetting blood; but, instead, holds up to us a beautiful woman daintily

fingering a corpse.

VII

QUATTROCENTISTERIA

_(How Sandro Botticelli saw Simonetta in the Spring)_

Up at Fiesole, among the olives and chestnuts which cloud the steeps, the

magnificent Lorenzo was entertaining his guests on a morning in April. The

olives were just whitening to silver; they stretched in a trembling sea

down the slope. Beyond lay Florence, misty and golden; and round about

were the mossy hills, cut sharp and definite against a grey-blue sky,

printed with starry buildings and sober ranks of cypress. The sun catching

the mosaics of San Miniato and the brazen cross on the fagade, made them

shine like sword-blades in the quiver of the heat between. For the valley

was just a lake of hot air, hot and murky--"fever weather," said the

people in the streets--with a glaring summer sun let in between two long

spells of fog. 'Twas unnatural at that season, _via_; but the blessed

Saints sent the weather and one could only be careful what one was about

at sundown.

Up at the villa, with brisk morning airs rustling overhead, in the cool

shades of trees and lawns, it was pleasant to lie still, watching these

things, while a silky young exquisite sang to his lute a not too audacious

ballad about Selvaggia, or Becchina and the saucy Prior of Sant' Onofrio.

He sang well too, that dark-eyed boy; the girl at whose feet he was

crouched was laughing and blushing at once; and, being very fair, she

blushed hotly. She dared not raise her eyes to look into his, and he knew

it and was quietly measuring his strength--it was quite a comedy! At each

wanton _refrain_ he lowered his voice to a whisper and bent a little

forward. And the girl's laughter became hysterical; she was shaking with

the effort to control herself. At last she looked up with a sort of sob in

her breath and saw his mocking smile and the gleam of the wild beast in

his eyes. She grew white, rose hastily and turned away to join a group of

ladies sitting apart. A man with a heavy, rather sullen face and a bush of

yellow hair falling over his forehead in a wave, was standing aside

watching all this. He folded his arms and scowled under his big brows; and

when the girl moved away his eyes followed her.

The lad ended his song in a broad sarcasm amid bursts of laughter and

applause. The Magnificent, sitting in his carved chair, nursed his sallow

face and smiled approval, "My brother boasts his invulnerability," he

said, turning to his neighbour, "let him look to it, Messer Cupido will

have him yet. Already, we can see, he has been let into some of the

secrets of the bower," The man bowed and smiled deferentially, "Signer

Giuliano has all the qualities to win the love of ladies, and to retain

it. Doubtless he awaits his destiny. The Wise Man has said that Beauty..."

The young poet enlarged on his text with some fire in his thin

cheeks, while the company kept very silent. It was much to their liking;

even Giuliano was absorbed; he sat on the ground clasping one knee between

his hands, smiling upwards into vacancy, as a man does whose imagination

is touched. Lorenzo nursed his sallow face and beat time to the orator's

cadences with his foot; he, too, was abstracted and smiling. At the end he

spoke: "Our Marsilio himself had never said nobler words, my Agnolo. The

mantle of the Attic prophet has descended indeed upon this Florence. And

Beauty, as thon sayest, is from heaven. But where shall it be found here

below, and how discerned?" The man of the heavy jowl was standing with

folded arms, looking from under his brows at the group of girls. Lorenzo

saw everything; he noticed him. "Our Sandro will tell us it is yonder. The

Star of Genoa shines over Florence and our poor little constellations are

gone out. _Ecco_, my Sandro, gravest and hardiest of painters, go

summon Madonna Simonetta and her handmaidens to our Symposium. Agnolo will

speak further to us of this sovereignty of Beauty."

The painter bowed his head and moved away.

A green alley vaulted with thick ilex and myrtle formed a tapering vista

where the shadows lay misty blue and pale shafts of light pierced through

fitfully. At the far end it ran out into an open space and a splash of

sunshine. A marble Ganymede with lifted arms rose in the middle like a

white flame. The girls were there, intent upon some commerce of their own,

flashing hither and thither over the grass in a flutter of saffron and

green and crimson. Simonetta--Sandro could see--was a little apart, a very

tall, isolated figure, clear and cold in a recess of shade, standing

easily, resting on one hip with her hands behind her. A soft, straight

robe of white clipped her close from shoulder to heel; the lines of her

figure were thrust forward by her poise. His eye followed the swell of her

bosom, very gentle and girlish, and the long folds of her dress falling

thence to her knee. While she stood there, proud and remote, a chance beam

of the sun shone on her head so that it seemed to burn. "Heaven salutes

the Queen of Heaven,--Venus Urania!" With an odd impulse he stopped,

crossed himself, and then hurried on.

He told his errand to her, having no eyes for the others.

"Signorina--I am to acquaint her Serenity that the divine poet Messer

Agnolo is to speak of the sovereign power of beauty; of the Heavenly

Beauty whereof Plato taught, as it is believed."

Simonetta arched a slim neck and looked down at the obsequious speaker, or

at least he thought so. And he saw how fair she was, a creature how

delicate and gracious, with grey eyes frank and wide, and full red lips

where a smile (nervous and a little wistful, he judged, rather than

defiant) seemed always to hover. Such clear-cut, high beauty made him

ashamed; but her colouring (for he was a painter) made his heart beat. She

was no ice-bound shadow of deity then! but flesh and blood; a girl--a

child, of timid, soft contours, of warm roses and blue veins laced in a

pearly skin. And she was crowned with a heavy wealth of red-gold hair,

twisted in great coils, bound about with pearls, and smouldering like

molten metal where it fell rippling along her neck. She dazzled him, so

that he could not face her or look further. His eyes dropped. He stood

before her moody, disconcerted.

The girls, who had dissolved their company at his approach, listened to

what he had to say linked in knots of twos and threes. They needed no

excuses to return; some were philosophers in their way, philosophers and

poetesses; some had left their lovers in the ring round Lorenzo. So they

went down the green alley still locked by the arms, by the waist or

shoulders. They did not wait for Simonetta. She was a Genoese, and proud

as the snow. Why did Giuliano love her? _Did_ he love her, indeed? He

was bewitched then, for she was cold, and a brazen creature in spite of

it. How dare she bare her neck so! Oh! 'twas Genoese. "Uomini senza fede e

donne senza vergogna," they quoted as they ran.

And Simonetta walked alone down the way with her head high; but Sandro

stepped behind, at the edge of her trailing white robe....

... The poet was leaning against an ancient alabaster vase, soil-stained,

yellow with age and its long sojourn in the loam, but with traces of its

carved garlands clinging to it still. He fingered it lovingly as he

talked. His oration was concluding, and his voice rose high and tremulous;

there were sparks in his hollow eyes.... "And as this sovereign Beauty is

queen of herself, so she is subject to none other, owns to no constraining

custom, fears no reproach of man. What she wills, that has the force of a

law. Being Beauty, her deeds are lovely and worshipful. Therefore Phryne,

whom men, groping in darkness and the dull ways of earth, dubbed

courtesan, shone in a Court of Law before the assembled nobles of Athens,

naked and undismayed in the blaze of her fairness. And Athens discerned

the goddess and trembled. Yes, and more; even as Aphrodite, whose darling

she was, arose pure from the foam, so she too came up out of the sea in

the presence of a host, and the Athenians, seeing no shame, thought none,

but, rather, reverenced her the more. For what shame is it that the body

of one so radiant in clear perfections should be revealed? Is then the

garment of the soul, her very mould and image, so shameful? Shall we seek

to know her essence by the garment of a garment, or hope to behold that

which really is in the shadows we cast upon shadows? Shame is of the brute

dullard who thinks shame. The evil ever sees Evil glaring at him, Plato,

the golden-moutheds with the soul of pure fire, has said the truth of this

matter in his _De Republicâ_ the fifth book, where he speaks of young

maids sharing the exercise of the Palæstra, yea, and the Olympic contests

even! For he says, 'Let the wives of our wardens bare themselves, for

their virtue will be a robe; and let them share the toils of war and

defend their country. And for the man who laughs at naked women exercising

their bodies for high reasons, his laughter is a fruit of unripe wisdom,

and he himself knows not what he is about; for that is ever the best of

sayings that the useful is the noble and the hurtful the base'...."

There was a pause. The name of Plato had had a strange effect upon the

company. You would have said they had suddenly entered a church and had

felt all lighter interests sink under the weight of the dim, echoing nave.

After a few moments the poet spoke again in a quieter tone, but his voice

had lost none of the unction which had enriched it.... "Beauty is queen:

by the virtue of Deity, whose image she is, she reigns, lifts up, fires.

Let us beware how we tempt Deity lest we perish ourselves. Actseon died

when he gazed unbidden upon the pure body of Artemis; but Artemis herself

rayed her splendour upon Endymion, and Endymion is among the immortals. We

fall when we rashly confront Beauty, but that Beauty who comes unawares

may nerve our souls to wing to heaven." He ended on a resonant note, and

then, still looking out over the valley, sank into his seat. Lorenzo, with

a fine humility, got up and kissed his thin hand. Giuliano looked at

Simonetta, trying to recall her gaze, but she remained standing in her

place, seeing nothing of her companions. She was thinking of something,

frowning a little and biting her lip, her hands were before her; her slim

fingers twisted and locked themselves nervously, like a tangle of snakes.

Then she tossed her head, as a young horse might, and looked at Giuliano

suddenly, full in the eyes. He rose to meet her with a deprecating smile,

cap in hand--but she walked past him, almost brushing him with her gown,

but never flinching her full gaze, threaded her way through the group to

the back, behind the poet, where Sandro was. He had seen her coming,

indeed he had watched her furtively throughout the oration, but her near

presence disconcerted him again--and he looked down. She was strongly

excited with her quick resolution; her colour had risen and her voice

faltered when she began to speak. She spoke eagerly, running her words

together.

"_Ecco_, Messer Sandro," she whispered blushing. "You have heard

these sayings.... Who is there in Florence like me?"

"There is no one," said Sandro simply.

"I will be your Lady Venus," she went on breathlessly. "You shall paint

me, rising from the sea-foam.... The Genoese love the sea." She was still

eager and defiant; her bosom rose and fell unchecked.

"The Signorina is mocking me; it is impossible; the Signorina knows it."

"Eh, _Madonna!_ is it so shameful to be fair--Star of the Sea as your

poets sing at evening? Do you mean that I dare not do it? Listen then,

Signer Pittore; to-morrow morning at mass-time you will come to the Villa

Vespucci with your brushes and pans and you will ask for Monna Simonetta.

Then you will see. Leave it now; it is settled." And she walked away with

her head high and the same superb smile on her red lips. Mockery! She was

in dead earnest; all her child's feelings were in hot revolt. These women

who had whispered to each other, sniggered at her dress, her white neck

and her free carriage; Giuliano who had presumed so upon her candour--

these prying, censorious Florentines---she would strike them dumb with her

amazing loveliness. They sang her a goddess that she might be flattered

and suffer their company: she would show herself a goddess indeed--the

star of her shining Genoa, where men were brave and silent and maidens

frank like the sea. Yes, and then she would withdraw herself suddenly and

leave them forlorn and dismayed.

As for Sandro, he stood where she had left him, peering after her with a

mist in his eyes. He seemed to be looking over the hill-side, over the

city glowing afar off gold and purple in the hot air, to Mont' Oliveto and

the heights, where a line of black cypresses stood about a low white

building. At one angle of the building was a little turret with a

belvedere of round arches. The tallest cypress just topped the windows,

There his eyes seemed to rest.

II

Earthwork out of Tuscany: Being Impressions and Translations of Maurice Hewlett · 第 5 / 10 段