CHAPTER III.

THE AMERICAN LITERATURE IS RATHER TOO MUCH MIXED WITH THE BELIEF OF

DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS FAITHS.

Six or seven years ago, I opened a book which I found on the central

table of the house’s parlor in which I lodged. It was the fifth, or

seventh edition of Notes, or Letters by a minister of the christian

reform who went through Italy. The reverend says in his book that the

pope received him kindly, and during the long conversation he had

with him, that very head of the catholic religion, praised America,

which is to say his country, because the american people tolerated the

catholic religion. Besides, the author of those Notes says in his very

book, that he was much pleased by the reception he received from the

pope. Still, the language which I read in that very book, against the

pope, and all the catholicism, was as much as what the preachers of

the reform had said against the catholics in darker ages, for which

iron, and fire did martyr so many catholic victims, and for which, even

in our times, the benevolent Charles the first of England, is still

calumniated, and the jealous, and tyrannic Elizabeth, is still elevated

to the sky, as one of the most virtuous queens. To change the mind of

such a minister of charity, who was kindly received by the pope, it is

not my purpose here. The mind of such a man, whom I do not know, it

might be of such materials, which turn harder the more you attempt to

bring it to reason. I would only advise the benevolent man, never to

visit any persons whom he cannot esteem. Had the author of those Notes

given me hospitality, and received me as the pope did receive him,

and afterwards, had I had the misfortune of using my spleen against

him, I could not esteem myself, unless I would publicly acknowledge my

inurbanity. As no pope has yet done any good to my desolate, afflicted,

dear country (and I do not except here, even Ganganelli himself) I

have never seen, and I have no wish to see any pope: but, as a lover

of justice, I do not like to see my enemy so badly treated. If in the

whole bible we can find one single passage inculcating persecution to

those, who do not think as we do; nay, if among the hundred and one

religions, grounded on the bible, the only true one condemns, and must

exterminate all the others; as we cannot be the contending party, and

the judge, let us do a good work’s day: I mean, let us make a bonfire

with all the bibles, though a great wisdom be mixed in it. If the

bible teaches us charity, love, tolerance, and natural understanding,

let us follow, venerate, and worship it; but, at the same time, let

us send into prisons those fanatics who, not minding history, arts,

and sciences, preach nothing but intolerance, and persecution with the

bible in their hands. The ancient romans had their censurers. In this

country I would have a board of gentlemen with officers to prevent

fanaticism, and persecution: and the preacher who says, that the best

moral is to brand those, who have a different religion from that which

he professes, should not be permitted to preach to an assembly of

honest people. The drunkard injures only himself, and very seldom the

few near him. The _spirit_ of fanaticism did exterminate nations! If we

are indebted to philosophy for the little religion which we have yet,

the true ministers of Christ must needs join with the humane voice of

philosophy, unless they have not at heart their families, life, and

lawful property of this world: and then, if they find fault with the

shakers, because the wish of these, is to annihilate the human race

by preventing marriage; the fanatics of other denominations are doing

nothing, but to administer arms to destroy those, who cannot think like

them.

Not only theological discussions take the place of literature in the

United States of America: there is, perhaps, no nation in the world

of the present century, in which theocracy attempts to swallow up the

people’s rights, though the constitution be against it. And, what

power can it have, the wisest constitution, if the plurality, part by

cunning, and part by ignorance, are undermining the very foundation of

man’s only happiness, his sacred rights? Just, intelligent, learned,

high minded clergymen are against the doctrine of Mr. Pusey: but, it

is with a sorrowful mind we have witnessed the too many reformers

wishing to adopt the very popish power, against the very power for

which Luther, and Calvin had, and have such an influence in the mind of

nations.

I will not pass under silence here, the ecclesiastical courts with

which they began by judging errors of faith, dereliction of duty, and

venial offences among the members, or officers of their churches; and,

with such a seeming insignificant beginning, they hold, already, such a

temporal power, with which they try now members, or officers, rendered

criminal by the laws of the land! The only trial of Rev. Fairchild,

charged with seduction, is a historical fact.

There are religious people in this world for whom, had I had the

mind of Voltaire, and obliged to live with them, I have no doubt

they would have rendered me the most religious man: and among like

blessed religious persons, my mother, and few others I have the

honor to be acquainted with, are of the number. But history, and the

very fanaticism of the middle age, which we have witnessed lately in

Philadelphia, are enough to make angels, and Sophy weep.

Though America has her great share of fanaticism, she is not the

only nation. At the time in which the smoke of the burning catholic

churches, in the city of brotherly love, was rising to heaven, Maria

Joaquino was sentenced to suffer death in Madeira, because she did

not consent with the doctrines received, and followed by the catholic

church. The difference between several governments of Europe, and the

United States of America is this: intolerance in Europe is in the hand

of despotical power against the many; and in America it is in the

hand of the many against their very paternal government. The european

people might one of our future days cut off the head of despotism; the

american people might place a despot on the throne. The sons of the

very pilgrims who ran from the persecution of religious rage into this

country, condemned the other day a Mr. Sable Rogers of Springfield,

Massachusetts, on a charge of violating the Lord’s day in mowing and

making hay. So that, while they preach tolerance, the puritans, with

no other reason but of being the most numerous, and by consequence the

strongest, they force, and condemn a jew, a catholic, a mahomedan, a

chinese; in a word, all those who have not their religion, and do not

feel inclined to do exactly what they do themselves. How can such a

despotical state, as Massachusetts, preach abolition against his slave,

brother states of the south, it is what a sound mind cannot understand;

unless we perceive in it, the blind, uncharitable language of the self

pocket interest, with which the north holds the tariff, against the

interest of the south.

The burning of the convent of those innocent Ursulines, and the little

knowledge I have of this country, caused me to foretell the last

horrors of Philadelphia. It was not a prophecy; it was but a coming

event, not different from those we read of in ancient history. If from

smoke we argue it must be some fire; from fanaticism we must expect

civil wars.

If it is a fact that false religions, false politics, false pride

brought desolation into the governments of the old continent; in

giving an ear to our faults, our duty is not to be too much pleased

of the praises which strangers, or americans bestow upon us, and our

government; and sleep under the laurel of our glory. The honest lover

of an innocent beauty looks upon her with jealousy, telling to her all

her faults in order to render her perfect, without which two married

beings cannot attain heavenly, moral happiness. The seducer tells her

she is pretty, and without faults: but, after having disgraced her, he

leaves with contempt the object of his lust to shed the bitter tears

of her vanity. Our duty, beloved americans, is to learn that a free

government, like this, cannot govern itself, unless arts, and sciences

will have taken the place of religious discussions. It seems to me,

that the schools of the Union have nothing in view, but to make divines

of all their pupils: and the bible which should not be put into the

hands of an innocent person, not only children are forced to study

nothing but it; it takes now the place of all the sciences. Are they

not, the historical horrors of the bible, repeated now in this very

country? However, Europe may sooner do that, which the philanthropists

of all ages had always expected: but, if the present America would look

for the happiness of man with the views of the fathers of this country,

America is better situated to attain sooner the amelioration of our

race.

Science tells us plainly; that, the face and forehead are the true

signs of an honest man: a hypocrite, whispers, in the ear of a

credulous father, not to give his daughter unto that man, who has no

other merit but a fine forehead. The credulous father believes the

hypocrite; and, spurning his best friend, gives his daughter to a

villainous low scull, in which acquisitiveness, and the back part of

the bloody brain, are the most predominant. A month after the wedding,

the low fore-headed, who knew how to natter such a father-in-law, kills

him now in order to become in possession of his property. Had that

father studied phrenology, instead of reading nonsense, he would still

live happy; and though the low scull was not born to be a genius, he

might, at least, have been more honest, had he seen that it was too

difficult for him to cheat his wise neighbor.

When Beccaria wrote of Crimes and Penalties, the whole world was for

torturing either innocents, or criminals, because divines with the

bible in their hands, were against Beccaria. And they were against

astronomy, and Galileo was one of the victims. The lava at the foot of

the neapolitan Vesuvius, the falls of Niagara tell us that the world

must have existed, at least, more than 10,000 years: but, with the

bible in their hands, geology must be a false science. And Columbus

was thought a dreamer: and Spinosa, Machiavelli, Locke, Spurzheim,

Bentham, Fourier, were branded with reprobation, and atheism. The

philosophers of our century prove, and demonstrate that the capital

penalty is as barbarous as the rack was before Beccaria; still, because

the bible says: tooth for tooth, and death for death; the criminal,

and, too often, the innocent, are not yet spared from the bloody law.

And calling themselves the only light of civilization, and social

intercourse, they do nothing but forcing mankind back to five thousand

years ago!

How can the rising generation of America govern themselves, when a

certain professor says to his hundred students, that Herschel told a

falsehood, when the latter demonstrated that in the moon must have been

quakes, and revolutions of matter? And why did the professor treat

Herschel so badly? Because, the so called learned man, wishing to admit

nothing but what he reads in the bible, thinks God would be unjust to

send evils in the moon, where those living beings had not committed

the original sin. For the sake of brevity, I will say nothing of Maria

Monk, Mathias, and women burned alive as witches by a verdict of jury.

In a country where the law permits every individual to worship God in

its own way, in spite of which Joseph Smith, and his brother, were

murdered in a prison--this only fact shows, that the legislators of

this country will lose their beneficial power, unless literature will

take the place of divinity. May God defend nations from the wrath of

fanatics; and the word Charity, so well understood by Jesus, may it be

felt as it should be. It is a shame in a christian land, where we boast

so much of our morals, to learn from the mouth of the present Sultan

a better tolerance: “Musulmans, christians, jews,” said he to his

subjects, “you are all dear to me, you are all my children. If there

be one amongst you who is oppressed, let him come forward, and justice

shall be done him; for it is my wish, that the laws which are made to

protect the lives, the properties, and the honor of my subjects, be

faithfully administered, musulman, christian, or jew; rich or poor;

soldier, priest, or layman, confide in my love, and in my justice; you

are all equal in my eyes, as you are equal before the law: you shall be

all treated as such; and the Almighty will reward, on the judgment day,

the honest, and faithful servant.”

In blaming fanaticism, I do not blame here the government, nor true

religious persons: and these, on the contrary, are the objects of my

greatest veneration: besides, the burning of the catholic churches in

Philadelphia, it is to hope, might have been but an instance of the

many bad chances of this world. Have we not seen the best rider braking

his neck? Have we not seen the most industrious man dying on the straw?

Have we not seen the poles, the italians crushed under the iron hand

of tyranny? And where is the ignorant of nations, who will say, that

the nations deserve their bad, or good existent position? To say so, it

would be as to maintain, there is no injustice in this world of tears;

but, not to see, or wishing not to see the faults of his own country,

it is the sign of a bad citizen, or of an ignoramus. You, noble victims

of tyranny, answer for me to like spoil children of fortune. Indeed,

he who enjoys the blessing of good laws, and laughs at, and scorns

the noble sufferers, is nothing else but like the impudent son of a

monarch, who, while he sees his subjects with straw in their mouth,

dying by famine, asks them, why they do not eat bread, and cheese. Swim

in your luxuries as long as you please; but do not taunt sufferers.

However, many nations are now awaked, and a good chance might turn,

sooner than many expect, all men into civilized beings; and then, the

country of man will be the whole earth. He who did not go farther than

one hundred miles from the place of his birth, knows but the first page

of this large book, the world: And he, who wishes to expel foreigners

from his native country, while he places the bushel over his light,

does nothing but imitate the chineses of Pekin. Could the greeks

surpass the egyptians, had these not opened the gates of civilization

to the former? Could the romans surpass the greeks, had the romans not

learned from the egyptians and greeks? And though the greater part

of Blackstone’s laws are not fit for America, are they not the laws

of Blackstone, but the laws of the egyptians, greeks, and romans,

interspersed with the feudal laws of Italy and France, adapted to, and

modified for the english soil?

Fearing not to be understood, I repeat here again. In writing against

uncharitable men, who use the bible improperly, in order to hinder

the progress of our race, I have still, and I hope I shall ever have

the greatest veneration, towards the benevolent ministers of Christ,

and happy christians, who see the daily loss which the heavenly moral

of Jesus does suffer, not from unbelievers; but from fanatics, and

hypocrites: and though the whole bible is not a book to be placed into

the hands of the innocent, he, or she acquainted with the world, if

they do read it without prejudice, it is a book of lofty, heavenly

moral inspiration, and the first book of literature. But, the true

christian follows the good which he finds in the bible, and leaves

all religious discussions to the wicked. The wise Christian, I say,

understands as well as Terence the _nequid nimis_. It is a religion in

the unerring nature which cannot fail: it is the religion of truth.

Our mind turns black by dint of reading black, and still more so, when

a great deal of bad is interspersed with good: and those, able to

discriminate bad from good, are, unfortunately, too few. The plurality

cannot judge by themselves, as far as they are taught to believe every

thing, which comes out from the mouth of a so called theologian. Miss

Davison, the victim of the Rev. Fairchild, had she not believed him

another David, as he pretended to be, she would have spared her shame.

Why a National Literature Cannot Flourish in the United States of North America · 第 3 / 10 章