CHAPTER XVIII.

As the Muses derive their subsistence from Apollo, and are perpetually

united to him, it is necessary to consider the nature of these

divinities in the next place, and the good which they confer on the

universe in conjunction with their leader Apollo. Plato therefore in

the Cratylus says “That the name of the Muses, and universally that of

music, was derived, as it seems, from μωσθαι, _to inquire_, and from

investigation and philosophy.” On which Proclus in his MS. Scholia on

that dialogue observes as follows:

“From discoursing about king Apollo, Plato proceeds to the Muses, and

the name of music; for Apollo is celebrated as Musagetes, or the leader

of the Muses. And he indeed is a monad with respect to the harmony

in the world; but the choir of the Muses is the monad of all the

number of the ennead (i.e. nine): From both likewise the whole world

is bound in indissoluble bonds, and is one and all-perfect, through

the communications of these divinities; possessing the former through

the Apolloniacal monad, but its all-perfect subsistence through the

number of the Muses. For the number nine which is generated from the

first perfect number (that is 3) is, through similitude and sameness,

accommodated to the multiform causes of the mundane order and harmony;

all these causes at the same time being collected into one summit for

the purpose of producing one consummate perfection. For the Muses

generate the variety of reasons with which the world is replete; but

Apollo comprehends in union all the multitude of these. And the Muses

give subsistence to the harmony of soul; but Apollo is the leader of

intellectual and impartible harmony. The Muses distribute the phænomena

according to harmonical reasons; but Apollo comprehends unapparent and

separate harmony. And though both give subsistence to the same things,

yet the Muses effect this according to number, but Apollo according

to union. And the Muses indeed distribute the unity of Apollo;

but Apollo unites harmonic multitude, which he also converts and

comprehends. For the multitude of the Muses proceeds from the essence

of _Musagetes_, which is both separate, and subsists according

to the nature of _the one_; and their number evolves the one and

primary cause of the harmony of the universe.

That such being the etymology of the name of the Muses, since Plato

calls philosophy the greatest music, as causing our psychical powers

to be moved harmoniously, in symphony with real beings, and in

conformity to the orderly motions of the celestial orbs; and since the

investigation of our own essence and that of the universe leads us to

this harmony, through a conversion to ourselves and more excellent

natures,--hence also we denominate the Muses from investigation. For

Musagetes himself unfolds truth to souls, according to one intellectual

simplicity; but the Muses perfect our various energies elevating them

to an intellectual unity. For investigations have the relation of

matter, with reference to the end from invention; just as multitude

with respect to _the one_, and variety with respect to simplicity.

We know therefore, that the Muses impart to souls the investigation of

truth, to bodies the multitude of powers, and that they are every where

the sources of the variety of harmonies.

In the fable likewise in the Phædrus about the grasshoppers Plato

speaks of the four Muses, Terpsichore, Erato, Calliope, and Urania,

as follows: “It is said the race of the grasshoppers received this

gift from the Muses, that they should never want nutriment, but should

continue singing without meat or drink till they died; and that after

death they should depart to the Muses, and inform them what Muse was

honoured by some particular person among us. Hence that by acquainting

Terpsichore with those who reverence her in the dance, they render her

propitious to such. By informing Erato of her votaries, they render

her favourable in amatory concerns; and the rest in a similar manner,

according to the species of veneration belonging to each. But that

they announce to the most ancient Calliope, and after her to Urania,

those who have lived in the exercise of philosophy, and have cultivated

the music over which they preside; these Muses more than all the rest

being conversant with the heavens, and with both divine and human

discourse; and sending forth the most beautiful voice.”

On what Plato here says of these Muses, Hermeas in his MS. Commentary

On the Phædrus, makes the following beautiful remarks: “Dancing here

must not be understood literally, as if Terpsichore was propitious

to those who engage in that kind of dancing which is the object of

sense; for this would be ridiculous. We must say therefore, that there

are divine dances; in the first place, the dance of the Gods; and

in the second place, that of divine souls. In the third place, the

revolution of the celestial divinities, viz. of the seven planets, and

the inerratic sphere, is called a dance. In the fourth place, those

who are initiated in the mysteries perform a certain dance. And in the

last place, the whole life of a philosopher is a dance. Who then are

those that honour the Goddess in the dance? Not those who dance well,

but those who live well through the whole of the present existence,

elegantly arranging their life, and dancing in symphony with the

universe. Again, Erato is denominated from Love, and from making the

works of Love, lovely; for she co-operates with Love. But Calliope

is denominated from the eye; and Urania presides over astronomy.

Through these two Goddesses we preserve our rational part from being

in subjection to the irrational nature. For through sight surveying

the order of the celestial Gods, we properly arrange our irrational

part. And farther still, through rythms, philosophy, and hearing, we

elegantly dispose that which we contain of the disorderly and void of

rythm.”

The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) · 第 18 / 56 章