CHAPTER III.

In the next place, it is necessary to observe of the mundane Gods

that they do not obtain the rank which they hold in the universe from

any habitude or arrangement towards bodies; for they are all of them

essentially liberated from body, unrestrained in their energies, and

have no proximity or alliance to a corporeal nature. For bodies are

ministrant to them, and are subservient to the generation of mutable

essences. Hence they are not in bodies, but rule over them externally;

so that they are not changed together with them. Farther still, they

impart from themselves to bodies, every good which they are capable

of receiving, but do not in return receive any thing from bodies; and

consequently they do not receive certain peculiarities from them.

For if indeed they had a subsistence like the habits of bodies, or

like material forms, or were corporeal after any other manner, it

might perhaps be possible for them to be transmuted together with

the differences of bodies. But if they antecedently subsist separate

from bodies, and are essentially unmingled with them, what reasonable

distinction can they derive from a corporeal nature? To which may be

added, that such an hypothesis makes bodies to be better than the

divine genera, if they afford a seat to more excellent causes, and

essentially insert in them characteristic peculiarities. He therefore,

who co-arranges the allotments and distributions of the governors with

the governed, will evidently ascribe authority and dominion to better

natures. For because the presiding powers possess such peculiarities,

on this account they chuse such an allotment, and give it essentially

a specific distinction; but the allotment itself is not assimilated to

the nature of the recipient.

With respect indeed to partial souls such as ours it is requisite to

admit that such as is the life which it emitted before it was inserted

in a human body, such also will be the organic body with which it is

connected, and such will be the nature consequent to it, and which

receives from the soul a more perfect life. But with respect to the

natures superior to man, and which have dominion as wholes, it must be

admitted, that inferior are produced in more excellent natures, bodies

in incorporeal essences, and fabrications in the fabricators of them,

and that being circularly comprehended in them, they are governed

according to invariable rectitude. The circulations therefore of the

celestial orbs are primarily inserted in the celestial circulations

of the etherial soul, in which they are perpetually inherent. And

the souls of the spheres being extended to the intellect which they

participate, are perfectly comprehended by, and are primarily generated

in it. Intellect also, both that which is partial, and that which

is universal, are comprehended in the more excellent genera. Since

therefore secondary natures are always converted to such as are first,

and superior natures as paradigms are the leaders of those that are

subordinate, both essence and form are derived from more excellent

beings to those of an inferior rank, and the latter are primarily

produced in the former, so as to derive from them order and measure,

and the properties by which they are characterized; while on the

contrary such properties do not flow from subordinate natures to such

as have a precedency and a greater dignity of essence.

In short, neither are the Gods held in subjection by certain parts

of the world, nor are terrestrial natures destitute of their

all-preserving influence; but superior powers at the same time that

they comprehend all things in themselves, are not comprehended

by any thing. And terrestrial natures having their very being in

the plenitudes of the Gods, when they become adapted to divine

participation, immediately prior to their own proper essence manifestly

possess the Gods which latently pre-subsisted in it.[67]

Farther still, divinity whether it is allotted certain portions of

the universe, such as the heavens or the earth, or sacred cities and

regions, or certain groves and sacred statues, illuminates all these

externally, viz. without any alliance to the things themselves, in

the same manner as the sun externally enlightens all things with its

rays; except that in the latter instance, the illuminating cause is

locally, but in the former is impassively, unextendedly, and in short

incorporeally external. As therefore, the solar light comprehends

in itself the illuminated objects, thus also the power of the Gods,

externally comprehends its participants. And as light is present with

the air, without being essentially mingled with it; which is evident

from no light remaining in the air, when once the illuminating source

has departed, though heat is present with it when that which heated

is entirely withdrawn; thus also the light of the Gods illuminates in

a separate manner, and being firmly established in itself, pervades

totally through all things. Indeed, this visible light of the sun, is

one, continued, and is every where the same whole, so that it is not

possible for any part of it to be separated and cut off from the rest,

nor to inclose it on all sides, nor divulge it from its source. After

the same manner therefore, the whole world being partible, is divided

about the one impartible light of the Gods. But this light is one

and every where the same whole, and is impartibly present to all the

natures that are able to partake of it. It likewise fills all things

through an all-perfect power, and bounds in itself wholes, by a certain

infinite causal transcendency; is every where united to itself, and

conjoins the terminations with the beginnings of things. But all heaven

and the world imitating this light, is circularly convolved, is united

to itself, conducts the elements in their circular motion, causes all

things to be in, and tend to each other, and ends to have juxtaposition

with their principles, and produces one connexion and consent of wholes

with wholes.

He therefore who surveys this visible image of the Gods (the world)

thus united in itself, will be ashamed to have a different opinion

of the Gods the causes of it, and to introduce in them divisions,

obstructions, and corporeal circumscriptions. For if there is no ratio,

no habitude of symmetry, no communion of essence, no connexion either

according to power or energy, between the adorning cause and adorned

effect; if this be the case, in the former there is neither a certain

extension according to interval, nor any local comprehension, or any

partible interception, nor any other similar innate equalization in

the manner in which the Gods are present. For in things which are of

a kindred nature either according to essence or power, or which are

in a certain respect similar in species, or homogeneous, a certain

mutual comprehension or retention may be perceived; but what coercion,

or transition through the universe, or partible circumscription, or

local comprehension, or any thing else of the like kind can there be in

natures perfectly exempt from the whole of things? For the participants

indeed of the divinities are such, that some of them participate

etherially, others aerially, and others aquatically of a divine

nature. And this the ancients perceiving, employed in their divine

operations, adaptations and invocations, conformably to a division of

this kind. And thus much concerning the distribution of the Gods in the

world.[68]

The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) · 第 3 / 56 章