OUR HOUSE ON FIRE.—-ETIQUETTE AT LONGWOOD.

19th.—The chimney of the saloon took fire in the night, but the flames

did not break out until day-light. Two hours sooner, and the building

would have been a heap of ashes.

The Emperor took a walk; he was attended by several of us, and we went

round the park on foot.

One of his shoe-buckles fell out, and we all eagerly strove to put it in

again; he, who succeeded, considered himself the most fortunate. The

Emperor, who would not have permitted this at the Tuileries, seemed here

to feel a kind of satisfaction at our conduct; he let us do as we liked,

and we were thankful to him for indulging us in an act, that did honour

to us, in our own opinion.

This leads me to observe that I have not yet spoken of our customary

manners when about his person, and I am more peculiarly induced to

notice them because we have received several London newspapers, which

circulate a thousand idle stories on this subject, and assert that the

imperial etiquette was as strictly maintained at Longwood as at the

Tuileries.

[Illustration: GROUND PLAN OF LONGWOOD.]

The Emperor behaved to us in the kindest manner, and with a paternal

familiarity. We were, on our part, the most attentive and respectful of

courtiers. We uniformly endeavoured to anticipate his wishes; we

carefully watched all his wants, and he had scarcely time to make a sign

with his hand, before we were in motion.

None of us entered his apartment without being sent for, and, if any

thing of importance was to be communicated to him, it was necessary to

apply to be admitted. If he walked separately with any of us, no other

presumed to intrude. In the beginning, we constantly remained uncovered

near his person, which appeared strange to the English, who had been

ordered to put on their hats, after the first salute. This contrast

appeared so ridiculous to the Emperor that he commanded us, once for

all, to behave like them. Nobody, except the two ladies, took a seat in

his presence, unless desired to do so. He was never spoken to till he

had spoken first, and always, and in all cases, the conversation was

under his control and guidance. Such was the etiquette at Longwood,

which was entirely, as it must be evident, that of our recollections and

feelings.

On our return, the Emperor received and questioned, for a long time, the

master of the Newcastle.

In consequence of the fire in the saloon, and a billiard-table being

placed in the dining-room, we dined in the topographical cabinet. After

dinner, there being no other apartment to retire to, we were obliged to

remain a long time at table. That circumstance seemed, however, to give

an additional interest to the conversation; we became more acquainted,

more united with each other; we gave a greater scope to our language,

and the evening passed off more rapidly.

ESTABLISHMENTS FOR MENDICITY IN FRANCE.—NAPOLEON’S PROJECTS RELATIVE TO

ILLYRIA.—HOSPITALS.—THE FOUNDLING.—PRISONERS OF STATE.—IDEAS OF THE

EMPEROR.

20th.—The Emperor sent for me in the morning; I found him reading an

English work on the poor’s rate, the immense sums raised, and the vast

number of individuals maintained at the expense of their parishes; the

account embraced millions of men and hundreds of millions of money.

The Emperor was apprehensive that he had not read the work correctly, or

that he had mistaken the meaning. The thing, he said, seemed altogether

impossible. He could not conceive by what vices and defects so many poor

could be found in a country so opulent, so industrious, and so abundant

in resources for labour as England. He was still less capable of

comprehending, by what prodigy the proprietors, overloaded with an

oppressive ordinary and extraordinary taxation, were also enabled to

provide for the wants of such a multitude. “But we have nothing,” he

observed, “in France to be compared to it in the proportion of a

hundredth or a thousandth part. Have you not told me that I sent you

into the departments on a particular mission with regard to mendicity?

Let us see, what is the number of our beggars? What did they cost? How

many poor-houses did I establish? What was the number they held? What

effect had they in removing mendicity?”

To this crowd of questions I was compelled to answer that a considerable

period of time had since elapsed, that my mind had been occupied with

several other objects, and that it was impossible for me to enter into

correct statements from mere recollection; but that I had the official

report itself among the few papers I had preserved, and that, the first

time he might be pleased to send for me, I should be enabled to satisfy

him. “But,” said he, “go instantly and look for it, things are not

profitable unless seasonably applied, and I shall soon run it over _with

my thumb_, as Abbé de Pradt ingeniously said; although, to tell the

truth, I don’t much like to think of such subjects; they remind me of

mustard after dinner.”

In two minutes the report was in his hand. “Well!” said the Emperor to

me, also, in a very few minutes, for it might be really said that he had

not turned over the leaves; “well, this, in fact, is not at all like

England. Our organization, however, had failed; I suspected as much, and

it was on that account I entrusted you with the mission. Your report

would have been in perfect conformity with my views. You took up the

consideration frankly and like an honest man, without fear of exciting

the displeasure of the minister, by depriving him of a great many

appointments.

“I am pleased with a great number of your details. Why did you not come

and converse with me about them yourself? You would have satisfied me,

and I should have known how to value your services.”—“Sire, as things

were then situated, it would have been impossible for me to do so; we

were then involved in the confusion and embarrassment caused by our

misfortunes.”—“Your observation is perfectly correct; you establish an

unquestionable position. The fact is that, in the flourishing state to

which I had raised the empire, no hands could any where be found

destitute of employment. It was idleness and vice alone that could

produce mendicants.

“You think that their complete annihilation was possible; and, for my

part, I am of the same opinion.

“Your levy _en masse_, to build a vast and single prison in each

department, was equally adapted to the tranquility of society and to the

well-being of those confined in it;—your idea of making them monuments

for ages would have attracted my attention. That gigantic undertaking,

its utility, its importance, the permanence of its results, were all in

my way.

“With respect to your university for the people, I am very apprehensive

that it would have been but a beautiful chimera of philanthropy, worthy

of the unsophisticated Abbé de Saint Pierre. There is, however, some

merit in the aggregate of those conceptions; but energy of character,

and an unbending perseverance, for which we are not generally

distinguished, would be requisite to produce any good result.

“For the rest, I every day collect ideas from you in this place, of

which I did not imagine you capable; but it was not at all my fault. You

were near me; why did you not open your mind to me? I did not possess

the gift of divination. Had you been minister, those ideas, however

fantastical they might at first have appeared to me, would not have been

the less attended to, because there is, in my opinion, no conception

altogether unsusceptible of some positive good, and a wrong notion, when

properly controlled and regulated, often leads to a right conclusion. I

should have handed you over to commissioners, who would have analyzed

your plans; you would have defended them by your arguments, and, after

taking cognizance of the subject, I alone should have finally decided

according to my own judgment. Such was my way of acting, and my

intention; I gave an impulse to industry; I put it into a state of

complete activity throughout Europe; I was desirous of doing as much for

all the faculties of the mind, but time was not allowed me. I could not

bring my plans to maturity at full gallop; and, unfortunately, I but too

often wasted them upon a sandy foundation, and consigned them to

unproductive hands.

“What were the other missions with which I entrusted you?”—“One in

Holland, another in Illyria.”—“Have you the reports?”—“Yes, Sire.”—“Go

for them.” But I had not got to the door, when he said, “Never mind,

come back, spare me the trouble of reading such matters!—They are

henceforth, in reality, altogether useless.”—What did not these words

unfold to me!

The Emperor resumed the subject of Illyria. “In obtaining possession of

Illyria, it was never my intention to retain it; I never entertained the

idea of destroying Austria. Her existence was, on the contrary,

indispensably requisite for the execution of my plans. But Illyria was,

in our hands, a vanguard to the heart of Austria, calculated to keep a

check upon her; a sentinel at the gates of Vienna, to keep her steady to

our interests. Besides, I was desirous of introducing and establishing

in that country our doctrines, our system of government, and our codes.

It was an additional step to the regeneration of Europe. I had merely

taken it as a pledge, and intended, at a later period, to exchange it

for Gallicia, at the restoration of Poland, which I hurried on against

my own opinion. I had, however, more than one project with regard to

Illyria; for I frequently fluctuated in my designs, and had few ideas

that were fixed on solid grounds. This arose rather from adapting myself

to circumstances than from giving an impulse and direction to them, and

I was every instant compelled to shift about. The consequence was that,

for the greater part of the time, I came to no absolute decision, and

was occupied merely with projects. My predominant idea, however,

particularly after my marriage, was to give it up to Austria as an

indemnity for Gallicia, on the re-establishment of Poland, at any rate,

as a separate and independent kingdom. Not that I cared upon whose head,

whether on that of a friend, an enemy, or an ally, the crown was placed,

provided the thing was effected. The results were indifferent to me. I

have, my dear Las Cases, formed vast and numerous projects, all

unquestionably for the advancement of reason and the welfare of the

human race. I was dreaded as a thunderbolt; I was accused of having a

hand of iron; but the moment that hand had struck the last blow, every

thing would have been softened down for the happiness of all. How many

millions would have poured their benedictions on me, both then and in

future times! But how numerous, it must be confessed, the fatal

misfortunes which were accumulated and combined to effect my overthrow,

at the end of my career! My unhappy marriage; the perfidies which

resulted from it; that villainous affair of Spain; from which I could

not disengage myself; that fatal war with Russia, which occurred through

a misunderstanding; that horrible rigour of the elements, which devoured

a whole army; ... and then, the whole universe against me!... Is it not

wonderful that I was still able to make so long a resistance, and that I

was more than once on the point of surmounting every danger and emerging

from that chaos more powerful than ever!... O destiny of man!—What is

human wisdom, human foresight!”—And then abruptly adverting to my

report, he said, “I observed, that you travelled over a great number of

departments. Did your mission last long? Was your journey agreeable? Was

it of real benefit to you? Did you collect much information? Were you

enabled to form a correct judgment on the state of the country, on that

of public opinion?

“I now recollect that I selected you precisely because you had just

returned from your mission to Illyria, and I found in your report

several things which made a strong impression upon me; for it is

surprising how many things at present are every day brought back to my

memory, which, at the time, struck me in you, and which, by a singular

fatality, were immediately afterwards completely forgotten. When any

appointments were about to take place to those special and confidential

missions, the decree, with blanks for the names, was laid before me, and

I filled them up with persons of my own selection—I must have written

your name with my own hand.”

“Sire,” I replied, “there never was, perhaps, a mission more agreeable

and satisfactory in every point of view. I commenced it early in the

spring, and proceeded from Paris to Toulon, and from Toulon to Antibes,

following the line of coast and occasionally diverging into the

interior. I travelled nearly thirteen hundred leagues, but unfortunately

the time was short. The minister, in his instructions, had strictly

limited the period to three, or at most, to four months. It would be

difficult for me to give an adequate description of all the delight,

enjoyments, and advantages which I derived from the journey. I was a

member of your Council, an officer of your household. I was every where

considered as one of your _missi dominici_, and was received with

suitable respect. The more I behaved with discretion, moderation, and

simplicity, visiting myself the high functionaries, whose attendance I

was authorized to require, the more I was treated with deference and

complaisance. For one, who shewed any distrust, or betrayed any symptom

of ill-humour or envy; (for I afterwards learnt from themselves, that my

character, as a nobleman, emigrant, and chamberlain, formed three

certain grounds for reprobation;) for one, I repeat, who looked upon me

with a jealous eye, I found many whose communications were altogether

unreserved, even upon subjects, respecting which I should not have

presumed to make inquiry. They assured me that they took pleasure in

unbosoming themselves to me with perfect openness; that they viewed my

situation, near the person of the sovereign, as a favourable medium; and

considered me as the confessor upon whom they relied for transmitting

their most secret thoughts to the _Most High_. The more I endeavoured to

convince them that they were mistaken with regard to my situation and

the nature of my mission, the more they were confirmed in the contrary

opinion. In so short a period, what a lesson for me on mankind! There

were none of these high functionaries who did not differ from each other

with regard to the views, means, and designs of all the objects under

consideration; and yet they were all men selected with care, of tried

ability, and generally of great merit. Persons in private life also

looked up to me as to a ray of Providence, and applied to me either

publicly or in secret. How many things did I not learn! How numerous the

denunciations and accusations communicated to me! What a multitude of

local abuses, of petty intrigues, were disclosed to me!

“Altogether unacquainted with affairs, and until then absolutely

ignorant of official proceedings, I made use of that peculiar

opportunity to obtain information. I did not fail to make myself

acquainted with all the objects and particular circumstances of every

party. I was not apprehensive of shewing my ignorance to the first who

presented themselves, for I was thus enabled to qualify myself for

discussing business with the others.

“It is true, Sire, that my special mission was restricted to the

mendicity establishments and the houses of correction: but feeling, as I

did, all the want of a stock of knowledge, fit to render myself useful

to the Council of State, and taking advantage of my appointment, I

connected with it, of my own accord, the minute inspection of prisons,

hospitals, and beneficent institutions, and I also took a survey of all

our ports and squadrons.

“How magnificent the combination which thus presented itself to my view!

I every where beheld the most perfect tranquillity and complete

confidence in the government; every hand, every faculty, every branch of

industry, was employed; the soil was embellished by the flourishing

state of agriculture, it was the finest time of the year; the roads were

excellent; public works were in progress in almost in every quarter;—the

canal of Arles, the noble bridge of Bordeaux, the works of Rochefort,

the canals from Nantes to Brest, to Rennes, to Saint Malo; the

foundation of Napoleonville, intended to be the key of the whole

peninsula of Britanny; the magnificent works of Cherbourg, those of

Antwerp, sluices, moles, or other improvements in most of the towns of

the Channel—such is the sketch of what I saw.

“On the other hand, the ports of Toulon, Rochefort, L’Orient, Brest,

Saint Malo, Havre, and Antwerp, displayed an extraordinary degree of

activity; our roads were filled with vessels, and the numbers increased

daily: our crews were training in spite of every obstacle, and our young

conscripts were becoming good seamen, fit for future service. I, who

belonged to the old naval establishment, was astonished at every thing I

saw on board, so very great were the improvements made in the art, and

so far did they exceed, in every point of view, all that I had

witnessed.

“The squadrons belonging to the different ports got under sail every

day, and executed their regular manœuvres, like the parades of

garrisons, and all this took place within sight of the English, who

thought it a ridiculous farce, without foreseeing the danger with which

they were threatened; for, never at any period was our navy more

formidable, or our ships more numerous. We already had upwards of 100

afloat or on the stocks, and we were making daily additions to the

number. The officers were excellent, and animated with zeal and ardour.

I had no idea whatever of the forward state of our preparations, before

I witnessed it in person, and should not have believed it, had I been

told of it.

“With respect to the mendicity establishments, the special object of my

mission, your intentions, Sire, had been ill understood, and the plan

was altogether unsuccessful. In most of the departments, mendicity not

only remained with all its defects, but no steps whatever had been taken

for its annihilation. The fact was that several prefects, so far from

making the establishments a terror to the _mendicants_, had merely

considered them as a refuge for the _poor_. Instead of holding out

confinement as a punishment, they caused it to be sought after as an

asylum; and thus the lot of the prisoners might be envied by the

hard-working peasantry of the neighbourhood. France might, in that way,

have been covered with similar establishments, which might have been

filled without diminishing the number of mendicants, who commonly make a

trade of begging, and follow it in preference. I was, however, enabled

to judge that the extirpation of the evil was possible, and the example

of some departments, in which the prefects had taken a better view of

the subject was sufficient to produce that conviction. There were a few

in which it had entirely disappeared.

“It is an observation which makes an immediate and striking impression,

that, all other things fairly averaged, mendicity is much more rare in

those parts which are poor and barren, and much more common in those

which are fruitful and abundant. It is also infinitely more difficult to

effect its destruction in the places where the clergy have enjoyed

superior wealth and power. In Belgium, for instance, mendicants were

seen to derive honour from their trade, and boast of having followed it

for several generations. These claims belonged peculiarly to them, and

that country was accordingly the rendezvous of mendicity.” “But I am not

surprised at it,” resumed the Emperor, “the difficulty of this important

consideration consists entirely in discriminating accurately between the

_poor_ man who commands our respect, and the _mendicant_ who ought to

excite our indignation; besides, our religious absurdities confound

these two classes so completely that they seem to make a merit, a kind

of virtue, of mendicity, and to encourage it by the promise of heavenly

rewards. The mendicants are, in reality, neither more nor less than

monks _au petit pied_; so that in the list of them we even find the

mendicant monks. How was it possible for such ideas not to produce

confusion in the mind, and disorder in society? A great number of saints

have been canonized, whose only apparent merit was mendicity. They seem

to have been transplanted to Heaven for that, which, considered as a

matter of sound policy, ought to have subjected them to castigation and

confinement in this world. This would not, however, have prevented them

from being worthy of Heaven. But go on.”—

“It was not, Sire, without emotion that I observed the details of the

charitable establishments. In contemplating the anxiety, the cares, the

ardent charity, of so many sympathetic hearts, I was enabled to

ascertain that we were far from yielding the palm, whatever might be the

consideration, to any other people, and that we merely had less

ostentation and made less use of artificial means to enhance our merits.

The South, above all, and Languedoc, in particular, displayed a zeal and

animation of which it would be difficult to form an adequate conception.

The hospitals and alms-houses were every where numerous and well

attended to. The foundlings had increased tenfold since the revolution,

and I instantly ascribed it to the corruption of the times; but I was

desired to remark, and constant reflection convinced me of the truth,

that the result was, on the contrary, to be attributed to very

satisfactory causes. I was assured that formerly the foundlings were so

wretchedly taken care of, and so badly fed, that the whole of them were

diminutive, sickly, and short-lived, and that from seven to nine

perished out of ten; while at present their food, cleanliness, and the

care taken of them, in every respect are such that nearly all of them

are preserved, and constitute a fine race of children. They are thus

indebted for their numbers solely to their preservation. Vaccination has

also contributed, in an immense proportion, to their increase. These

children are now treated with such attention as to give rise to a

singular abuse. Mothers, even in easy circumstances, are tempted to

expose their infants; they afterwards apply at the hospital, and, under

a charitable pretence, offer to bring up one themselves; it is their own

which is restored to them with the benefit of a small allowance. All

this is carried on through the favour of the agents themselves, and

often for the purpose of obtaining a trifling pension for one of their

relations. Another abuse of this kind, and not less extraordinary, was

that which I observed in Belgium, of persons getting their names entered

a long time before, for the purpose of entitling them to send their

children to the hospital. Any young couple, on their marriage, strove to

get their names entered for vacancies, which fell to them some years

afterwards, as a matter of right; it was a part of the marriage

settlement.”—“O Jesus! Jesus!” exclaimed the Emperor, shrugging up his

shoulders and laughing, “and after this make laws and regulations!”—

$1“$2”$3But with regard to the prisons, Sire, they were almost uniformly

the scenes of horror and real misery, the shame and disgrace of our

provinces, absolute sinks of corruption and infection, which I was

obliged to pass through with the utmost haste, or from which I was

driven back in spite of all my efforts. I had formerly visited certain

prisons in England, and indulged in a smile at the kind of luxury which

I observed in them; but it was quite a different thing with respect to

ours, and my indignation was excited by the contrary extreme. There are

no offences, I might even say crimes, that are not sufficiently punished

by such habitations, and those who leave them should not, in strict

justice, have any further expiation to make. Yet after all those

confined in them were merely under a simple accusation, while those who

had been found guilty, the real criminals, and hardened villains, had

their special prisons, their houses of correction, where they were,

perhaps, too well taken care of; and even, in the latter case, the

honest day-labourer might have reason to envy their lot, and make

comparisons injurious to Providence and society. Another striking

inconsistency was observable in these houses of correction; it was the

amalgamation, the habitual mixture of all the classes upon whom sentence

had been passed. Some being imprisoned for small offences only for a

year, and others for fifteen, twenty years, or for life, on account of

the dreadful crimes they had perpetrated, it necessarily followed that

they would be all reduced to one moral level, not by the amelioration of

the latter, but rather by the corruption of the former.

“What struck me also very forcibly in La Vendée and the adjacent country

was that maniacs had increased there, perhaps, tenfold more than in any

other part of the empire, and that persons were detained in the

mendicity establishments and other places of confinement, who were

treated as vagabonds, or likely to become so, and who having been taken

up in their childhood, had no knowledge of their parents or origin. Some

of them had marks of wounds on their persons, but were ignorant how they

had been inflicted. They had, no doubt, been made in their infancy. The

opportunity of employing these persons, who had not acquired a single

social idea, has been suffered to pass by; they are now unfit for any

purpose.”—“Ah!” exclaimed the Emperor, “this is civil war and its

hideous train; its inevitable consequences and its certain fruits! If

some leaders make fortunes, and extricate themselves from danger, the

dregs of the population are always trodden under foot, and become the

victims of every calamity!”

“With respect to other matters, I found in the aggregate of these

establishments a considerable number of persons who, I was told, whether

right or wrong, were prisoners of state, and were kept in custody by

order of the high, the intermediate, or the low, police.

“I listened to all those prisoners, I heard their complaints, and

received their petitions, certainly, without any engagement on my part;

for I had no right to contract any; and besides, I was perfectly aware

that, having heard their testimony only, I could not attach guilt to any

person. With the exception, however, of some notorious villains, they

did not really, in general, deserve more at farthest than the common

punishments of the correctional police.

“I found among them, in the prisons of Rennes, a boy between twelve and

fourteen, who had, when only a few months old, been taken with a band of

_Chauffeurs_. They had been all executed, and the boy had remained there

ever since, without any decision on his case. His moral capabilities may

be easily appreciated. He never saw, knew, or heard any but villains;

they were the only kind of people of whose existence he was able to form

an idea.

“At Mont Saint-Michel, a woman, whose name I have forgotten,

particularly attracted my attention. She had rather a pretty face,

pleasing manners, and a modest deportment. She had been imprisoned

fourteen years, having taken a very active part in the troubles of La

Vendée, and constantly accompanied her husband, who was the chief of a

battalion of insurgents, and whom she succeeded, after his death, in the

command. The wretchedness she suffered, and the tears she shed, had

sensibly impaired her charms. I assumed a severe air during the recital

of her misfortunes, but it was put on for the purpose of concealing the

emotions which she excited. She had, by the kindness of her manners and

her other qualifications, acquired a kind of empire over the vulgar and

depraved women that were about her. She had devoted herself to the care

of the sick; the prison infirmary was entrusted to her, and she was

beloved by every one.

“With the exception of that woman, a few priests, and two or three old

Chouan spies, the rest exhibited but a filthy compound of disgusting or

extravagant depravity.

“I met with a married man, possessing an annual income of 15,000 livres,

evidently confined in consequence of his wife’s intrigues, after the

manner of the ancient _lettres de cachet_; and with prostitutes, who

assured me they were detained, not as a punishment for the

indiscriminate profusion of their favours, but out of spite at their

want of complaisance for a single person. They told me lies, or they did

not; but in either case ought they to be honoured with the title of

prisoners of state, to be maintained at the expense of two francs a day,

and contribute to render the government odious and ridiculous? Finally,

I met with an unhappy man in a town of Belgium, who had married one of

those girls for whom the municipalities provide marriage portions on

great occasions. He was imprisoned on a charge of having stolen the

portion, because he had neglected to earn it. He was positively required

to discharge that important debt, and he as positively refused. He was,

perhaps, required to do what was absolutely impossible for him.

“Immediately upon my return to Paris, I called on M. Réal, prefect of

police of the district I had just visited. I considered it my duty, I

said, to communicate to him, in a _friendly_ manner, the result of my

observations. I must do him justice; for whether he was far from having

a bad heart, whether he was impressed with my plain dealing, or affected

perhaps, Sire, by the magic influence of your uniform, he thanked me,

observed that I was doing him a real service, and assured me that he

would take immediate steps for _relieving_ and _redressing_, such were

his words, the cases I had laid before him. Meeting him, however, a few

days afterwards at an assembly, he said, with apparent grief, ‘That is

an unfortunate business, and very unfavourable to your Amazon (he

alluded to General Mallet’s rash enterprise), which I thought myself

capable of doing a few days ago of my own accord. I cannot now pretend

to undertake it without an order from a superior quarter.’—I do not know

how the thing ended.”

The Emperor dwelt some time on the abuses I had pointed out, and then

concluded: “In the first place, in order to proceed regularly, it was

incumbent upon you to ascertain whether your information was well

founded, and to hear the evidence against the persons accused; and then

it must be frankly admitted that abuses are inherent in every human

establishment. You see that almost every thing, of which you complain,

is done by the very persons who were expressly entrusted with the means

of prevention. Can a remedy be provided, when it is impossible to see

what passes every where? There is, as it were, a net spread over the low

places, which envelops the lower classes. A mesh must be broken and

discovered by a fortunate observer like you, before any thing of the

matter is known in the upper regions. Accordingly, one of my dreams

would have been, when the grand events of war were completely

terminated, and I returned to the interior in tranquillity and at ease,

to look out for half a dozen, or a dozen, of real philanthropists, of

those worthy men who live but to do good. I should have distributed them

through the empire, which they should have secretly inspected for the

purpose of making their report to me. They would have been _spies of

virtue_! They should have addressed themselves directly to me, and

should have been my confessors, my spiritual guides, and my decisions

with them should have been my good works done in secret. My grand

occupation, when at full leisure, and at the height of my power, would

have been the amelioration of every class of society. I should have

descended to the details of individual comfort; and, had I found no

motive for that conduct in my natural disposition, I should have been

actuated by the spirit of calculation; for, after the acquisition of so

much glory, what other means would have been left me to make any

addition to it? It was because I was well aware that that swarm of

abuses necessarily existed, because I wished for the preservation of my

subjects, and was desirous of throwing every impediment in the way of

subordinate and intermediate tyranny, that I conceived my system of

state prisons, adapted to any crisis that might occur.”—“Yes, Sire, but

it was far from being well received in our saloons, and contributed not

a little to make you unpopular. An outcry was every where raised against

the _new bastiles_, against the renewal of _lettres de cachet_.”—“I know

it very well.” said the Emperor, “the outcry was echoed by all Europe,

and rendered me odious. And yet, observe how powerful was the influence

of words, envenomed by perfidy! The whole of the discontent was

principally occasioned by the preposterous title of my decree, which

escaped me from distraction, or some other cause; for, in the main, I

contend that the law itself was an eminent service, and rendered

individual liberty more complete and certain in France than in any other

country of Europe.

“Considering the crisis from which we had emerged, the factions by which

we had been divided, and the plots which had been laid, and were still

contriving, imprisonment became indispensable. It was, in fact, a

benefit; for it superseded the scaffold. But I was desirous of

sanctioning it by legal enactments, and of placing it beyond the reach

of caprice, of arbitrary power, of hatred, and of vengeance. Nobody,

according to my law, could be imprisoned and detained as a prisoner of

state, without the decision of my privy council, which consisted of

sixteen persons; the first, the most independent and most distinguished

characters of the state. What unworthy feeling would have dared to

expose itself to the detection of such a tribunal? Had I not voluntarily

deprived myself of the power of consigning individuals to prison? No man

could be detained beyond a year, without a fresh decision of the

Privy-Council, and four votes out of sixteen were sufficient to effect

his release. Two councillors of state were bound to attend to the

statements of the prisoners, and became from that moment their zealous

advocates with the Privy Council. These prisoners were also under the

protection of the Committee of individual liberty, appointed by the

Senate, which was the object of public derision, merely because it made

no parade of its labours and their results. Its services, however, were

great; for it would argue a defective knowledge of mankind to suppose

that Senators, who had nothing to expect from ministers, and who were

their equals in rank, would not make use of their prerogative to oppose

and attack them, whenever the importance of the case called for their

interference. It must also be considered that I had assigned the

superintendence of the prisoners, and of the police of the prisons, to

the tribunals, which, from that instant, paralyzed the exercise of every

kind of arbitrary authority by the other branches of administration and

their numerous subordinate agents. After such precautions, I do not

hesitate to maintain that civil liberty was as effectually secured by

that law in France as it could possibly be. The public misconceived, or

pretended to misconceive, that truth, for we Frenchmen must murmur at

every thing and on every occasion.

“The fact is, that at the time of my downfal the state prisons scarcely

contained 250 persons, and I found 9000 in them, when I became Consul.

It will appear, from the list of those who were imprisoned, and upon an

examination into the causes and motives of their confinement, that

almost every one of them deserved death, and would have been sentenced

to it by regular process of law; and it consequently follows that their

imprisonment was, on my part, a benefit conferred upon them. Why is

there nothing published against me on this subject at present? Where are

the serious grievances to be found with which I am reproached? There are

none in reality. If some of the prisoners afterwards made a merit of

their sufferings with the King, on account of their exertions in his

favour, did they not by that proceeding pronounce their own sentence and

attest my justice? For what may seem a virtuous action in the King’s eye

was incontestably a crime under me; and it was only because I was

repugnant to the shedding of blood on account of political crimes, and

because such trials would have but tended to the continuance of

commotion and perplexity in the heart of the country, that I commuted

the punishment to mere imprisonment.

“I repeat it, the French were, at my era, the freest people of all

Europe, without even excepting the English; for, in England, if any

extreme danger causes the suspension of the _Habeas Corpus_ act, every

individual may be sent to prison at the mere will of ministers, who are

not called upon to justify their motives, or to account for their

conduct. My law had very different limits.” He concluded with

saying;—“And then, at last, if, in spite of my good intention, and

notwithstanding my utmost care, all that you have just said, and no

doubt, many other things, were well founded, it must not still be

considered so easy a task as it is thought to create a beneficial

establishment for a nation. It is a remarkable circumstance that the

countries which have been separated from us have regretted the laws with

which I governed them. This is an homage paid to their superiority. The

real, the only, mode of passing a decisive sentence upon me, with regard

to their defects, would be to shew the existence of a better code in any

other country. New times are drawing near, it will be seen,” &c.

About five o’clock, I was told by the Grand Marshal, who had just left

the Emperor, that he wished to see me. He had staid at home the whole of

the day. I found him engaged in examining the new billiard-table. He was

apprehensive that the weather was too damp for walking, and he played at

chess until dinner. In the evening, he read us Crebillon’s _Atrée et

Thyeste_. That piece seemed horrible to us; we found it disgusting, and

by no means of a tragic cast. The Emperor could not finish it.

Memoirs of the life, exile, and conversations of the Emperor Napoleon. (Vol. III) · 第 9 / 40 题