THE GOOD IS NOT GOOD FOR ITSELF, BUT ONLY FOR THE NATURES BELOW IT.

Intelligence must therefore fuse with thought, and must always be

conscious of itself, knowing that each of the two elements that

constitute it is identical with the other, and that both form but a

single one. If it were only unity, it would be self-sufficient, and

would have no further need of receiving anything. The precept "know

thyself" applies only to natures which, because of their multiplicity,

need to give an account of themselves, to know the number and the

quality of their component elements, because they either do not know

them entirely, or even not at all; not knowing what power in them

occupies the first rank, and constitutes their being.[160] But if

there be a Principle which is one by itself, it is too great to know

itself, to think itself, to be self-conscious, because it is nothing

determinate for itself. It receives nothing within itself, sufficing

itself. It is therefore the Good not for itself, but for other natures;

these indeed need the Good, but the Good has no need of itself; it

would be ridiculous, and would fail to stand up to itself. Nor does it

view itself; for, from this look something would arise, or exist for

Him. All such things He left to the inferior natures, and nothing that

exists in them is found in Him; thus (the Good) is not even "being."

Nor does (the Good) possess thought, since thought is united to being,

and as primary and supreme thought coexisted with essence. Therefore,

one can not (as says Plato[150]), express (the divinity) by speech,

nor have perception nor science of Him, since no attribute can be

predicated of Him.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 3 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 147 / 442 题