20 _Rallus pectoralis._

Produced by Lesley Halamek, Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper,

Mark Orton (for the Formatting Template), and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

Transcriber's Note.

^ indicates a superscript.

_text_ indicates italic type.

=text= indicates bold type.

A missing line on Page 25 (_in italics_)

(Their wings are paddles, being flattened and devoid of quills.

_The wings are not folded, but are carried hanging awkwardly at_

the side.)

was restored from a different Edition on Google Books

(http:// books.google.com/books?id=Rn3uthhODo8C&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25).

Sundry damaged or missing punctuation has been repaired, and a few

index entries have been amended.

The use of hyphens was not necessarily consistent throughout this book.

In some instances there are subtle differences in meaning.

Some Australian/British spellings (e.g. coloured, defence, draught,

grey, learnt, lustre, etc.) have been retained, though color/colored

and gray are more prevalent. The Author has used various resources.

From Wikipedia:

"DR JOHN ALBERT LEACH (19 March 1870 - 3 October 1929) was an

ornithologist, teacher and headmaster in the state of Victoria,

Australia.

Leach was born in Ballarat, Victoria and educated at Creswick Grammar

School (where he was dux), Melbourne Training College (1890) and the

University of Melbourne, where he graduated B.Sc. in 1904, M.Sc. in

1906 and in 1912 obtained his doctorate for research in ornithology.

Leach was a regular writer and broadcaster on natural history subjects

and introduced it into the school curriculum. He was President of the

Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union (RAOU) 1922-1924 and Editor of

its journal The Emu 1914-1924 and 1928-1929. He was a member of the

British Ornithologists Union and a corresponding fellow of the

American Ornithologists Union. Leach was also member of the Field

Naturalists Club of Victoria. He was instrumental in founding the

Gould League of Bird Lovers in 1909 with Jessie McMichael. He is best

known as the author of An Australian Bird Book, the first edition of

which was published in 1911, and of Australian Nature Studies in 1922.

He also part-authored a series of Federal Geography books, and worked

on the Official Checklist of the Birds of Australia second and revised

edition, published by the RAOU in September 1926.

Leach had been preparing two books before his death, one of these was

a collection of weekly radio broadcasts he made on 3LO in the mid

1920s....

Among his contributions to ornithology was the relationship between

the Australian Magpie, butcherbirds and currawongs in the family

Cracticidae, now sunk as a subfamily into Artamidae."

This book is a field guide. The pages were divided vertically, with

the tabular matter on the top half, and the Lecture on the bottom half

of the page.

The ebook has been re-arranged so that the separate parts have a

smoother flow. The top parts of the pages have been left intact, but

the bottom parts have been collected together and moved, so that the

Lecture text for each ORDER precedes the tabular listing and

descriptions for that ORDER.

The only exception is for ORDER XXI.

ORDER XXI.--Perching-Birds--contains 11,500 species, more than

three-fifths of the world's 19,000 birds. It has been arranged into

sets of suitable groups of FAMILIES, to make it easier to access.

==== has been used to separate the Lecture from the Tabular matter.

From "PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.":

"In response to requests from beginners, a table has been added on

page 190. This table shows the page on which a bird of a certain size

may be found."

As the page numbers are an integral part of the field guide, and

necessary for the identification of birds seen in the field, in flight,

or found dead, they have been inserted into the tabular section, as

[Page xx].

Sometimes a page has contained the end entries of one ORDER, or one

Family, and the beginning entries of the next. In these few instances

(e.g. [Page 18a] and [Page 18b]; [Page 188a] and [Page 188b]), it may

be necessary for the reader to search both sections of the page.

For birds mentioned in the Lecture, it would be necessary to search by

bird name.

NAMES RECENTLY AMENDED (located after the INTRODUCTION).

It seems important to have these new names available, so they have

been added to (e.g.)

=20 Slate-breasted Rail= ....

as [~20 _Rallus pectoralis._]

so:

=20 Slate-breasted Rail= (Short-toed), Lewin Water-Rail,

_Eulabeornis (Hypotaenidia) brachypus_, A., T., Auckland Is.

=vt. Eur. Water-Rail.

[~20 _Rallus pectoralis._]

See also the explanatory notes in the PREFACE, and in the PREFACE TO

THE SECOND EDITION.

"The number at the right side of the page is the length of the bird in

inches (from the tip of bill to the tip of tail)." ...

so:

1

1

=2* Mallee-Fowl=, Lowan, Native Pheasant, Pheasant (e),

_Leipoa ocellata_, N.S.W., V., S.A., W.A.

Stat. r. _mallee scrubs_ 24

Like a small turkey; neck light fawn-gray; back, wings spotted

white, black, brown; f., smaller. Seeds, ants.

This means there is one genus of Mallee-Fowl in the world, and it is

found only in Australia. It is listed in this book as Bird number 2,

which has a colored illustration, indicated by the asterisk, *.

It is stationary (not migratory), rarely seen, lives in mallee scrubs,

and is 24" long.

It resembles a small turkey; its neck is light fawn-gray; its back

and wings are spotted white, black, and brown; the female is smaller;

and it feeds on seeds and ants.

Note (From NOTE following "PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION."):

A.--Australian Region (from Wallace's Line to Sandwich Islands

and New Zealand, see map p. 10).

'Sandwich Islands' is an old name for Fiji.

* * * * *

[Illustration: [2] [3] [4] [6] [8] [11] [14] [16]]

=2= Mallee-Fowl

=3= Stubble Quail

=4= Brown Quail

=6= King Quail

=8= Painted Quail

=11= Plain Wanderer

=14= Diamond Dove

=16= Bronzewing Pigeon

AN AUSTRALIAN BIRD BOOK

A Pocket Book for Field Use

BY

J. A. LEACH, M.Sc.

_First-class Honorman and University Exhibitioner and Scholar in

Biology; Organizing Inspector of Nature Study, Education Department,

Victoria; Member of the Council of the Royal Australasian

Ornithologists' Union; Vice-President of the Field Naturalists' Club

of Victoria; &c._

With Introduction by

FRANK TATE, M.A., I.S.O.

_Director of Education, Victoria._

_Published by arrangement with the Education Department

of Victoria._

SECOND EDITION

[Illustration]

MELBOURNE

Christchurch, Wellington, Dunedin, N.Z., and London.

WHITCOMBE & TOMBS LIMITED

1912

[Illustration: _The Queen City Printers_]

_Illustrations from Specimens (318) in the National Museum, Melbourne;

the balance mostly from Specimens in the Entomological Museum, C.

French (59), and in the collections of A. Coles, Taxidermist, (36),

C. F. Cole, and D. Le Souef. Twenty-two birds were photographed from

Gould's "Birds of Australia," five from drawings specially prepared by

C. C. Brittlebank, the well-known naturalist-artist, and one from the

Report of the Horn Expedition._

_Photos by Ralph L. Miller._

_Engravings by Patterson Shugg & Co., from Paintings by Miss Ethel M.

Paterson._

INTRODUCTION.

Nature-study in our schools is fast producing a generation of

Australians trained to look upon the characteristic beauties of our

Australian skies, our trees, our flowers, our birds with a passionate

appreciation almost unknown to our pioneering fathers and mothers.

It was natural that newcomers from the Old World should have been

impressed, and often unfavorably impressed, by the oddness of things

here. Rural sights to them had hitherto been sights of trim meadows

bordered by neat hedgerows, of well-cultivated fields and comfortable

farmsteads, or of stately homes set in fair gardens and far-reaching

parks of magnificently-spreading trees. What wonder, then, that they

were at first almost repelled by the strangeness and unfamiliarity

of their new surroundings! How could eyes accustomed to the decided

greens and to the somewhat monotonous shapeliness of the trees in

an English summer landscape find beauty all at once in the delicate,

elusive tints of the gum trees, or in the wonderfully decorative lines

of their scanty boughs and light foliage shown clear against a bright

sky? And so a land which is eminently a land of color, where

the ever-present eucalypts give in their leaves every shade from

blue-grays to darkest greens; where the tender shoots show brilliantly

in bright crimson, or duller russets, or bright coppery-gold;

and where tall, slender stems change slowly through a harmony of

salmon-pinks and pearl-grays, has been called a drab-colored land.

Even now, the beauty of the gum tree is not sufficiently appreciated

by Australians, and we see all too few specimens in our suburban

gardens. For an appreciation of the decorative effect of our young

blue gums, we must go to the Riviera or to English conservatories.

Australia has suffered greatly from phrase-makers. There is still much

popular belief that our trees are shadeless, our rivers are waterless,

our flowers are scentless, our birds are songless. Oddities in our

flora and fauna have attracted the notice of superficial observers,

and a preference for epigrammatic perfection, rather than for

truthful generalization, has produced an abundance of neatly-expressed

half-truths, which have been copied into popular literature, and even

into school books. Our English-bred poet, Gordon, writes of lands--

"Where bright blossoms are scentless,

And songless, bright birds."

and these lines are remembered better than his description in the same

poem of Spring--

"When the wattle gold trembles

'Twixt shadow and shine,

When each dew-laden air draught resembles

A long draught of wine."

It is true that we have scentless, bright blossoms; but Australia

is the home of the richly-perfumed wattle, and the boronia, with

its never-cloying fragrance; while there is, perhaps, no forest more

odorous than a forest of eucalypts. It is true, too, that we have

bright birds that have no excellence in song; but it is also true

that, in this favored land, there is a far greater proportion than

usual of fine song-birds.

The first generations of Australians were not taught to love

Australian things. We "learned from our wistful mothers to call Old

England home." Our school books and our story books were made in Great

Britain for British boys and girls, and naturally they stressed what

was of interest to these boys and girls. We read much about the beauty

of the songs of the Lark, and the Thrush, and the Nightingale, but we

found no printed authority for the belief that our Magpie is one of

the great song-birds of the world; we read of the wonderful powers

of the American Mocking-Bird, and did not know that our beautiful

Lyrebird is a finer mimic; we learned by heart Barry Cornwall's

well-known poem on "The Storm Petrel," and did not know that one of

the most interesting of Petrel rookeries is near the harbor gate

of Melbourne; and I remember well a lesson I heard as a boy on the

migration of birds, in which the teacher took all of his illustrations

from his boyish experiences in the South of England, and gave us no

idea that the annual migration of our familiar Australian birds to

far-off Siberia is a much more wonderful thing.

But all this is being rapidly changed. In the elementary schools

Nature-study is steadily improving, and children are being given an

eye for, and an interest in, the world of Nature around them. Our

school books are now written from the Australian standpoint, and more

use can, therefore, be made of the child's everyday experience. Field

Naturalists' clubs are doing much to extend the area of specialized

Nature-study, and their members are giving valuable assistance to the

schools by taking part in the programs for Arbor Day, Bird Day, and

the like. The growing interest in the Australian fauna and flora

is further evidenced by the frequent reservations by Government of

desirable areas as national parks and sanctuaries for the preservation

of Australian types. Last, but not least, is the production by capable

Nature students of special books on some form of Nature-study, such as

this Bird Book by Mr. Leach.

To our parents, Australia was a stranger land, and they were

sojourners here. Though they lived here, they did not get close enough

to it to appreciate fully its natural beauty and its charm. To us,

and especially to our children, children of Australian-born parents,

children whose bones were made in Australia, the place is home. To

them Nature makes a direct appeal, strengthened by those most powerful

of all associations, those gathered in childhood, when the foundations

of their minds were laid. The English boy, out on a breezy down, may

feel an exaltation of soul on hearing a Skylark raining down a flood

of delicious melody from far up at heaven's gate, but his joy is no

whit greater than his who hears, in the dewy freshness of the early

morning, the carol of the Magpie ringing out over an Australian plain.

To those who live in countries where the winter is long and bitter,

any sign that the genial time of flowers is at hand is very welcome.

All over the countryside the first call of the Cuckoo, spring's

harbinger, arouses the keenest delight in expectant listeners. This

delight is, however, more than mere delight in the bird's song. And to

those brought up with it year by year there comes a time when the call

of the Cuckoo stirs something deep down below the surface of ordinary

emotion. It is the resultant of multitudes of childhood experiences

and of associations with song and story. I first heard the Cuckoo in

Epping Forest one delicious May evening four years ago. It charmed me,

but my delight was almost wholly that of association. All the English

poetry I knew was at the back of the bird's song. Here in Australia

we have no sharply-defined seasons, yet I find myself every spring

listening eagerly for the first plaintive, insistent call of the

Pallid Cuckoo. For me his song marks another milestone passed.

Marcus Clarke wrote of the Laughing Jackasses as bursting into

"horrible peals of semi-human laughter." But then Marcus Clarke was

English-bred, and did not come to Australia till he was eighteen years

old. It makes all the difference in our appreciation of bird or tree

or flower to have known it as a boy. I venture to think no latter-day

Australian who has grown up with our Kookaburra can have any but

the kindliest of feelings for this feathered comedian. For myself, I

confess that I find his laughter infectious, and innumerable times he

has provoked me into an outburst as hearty and as mirthful as his own.

More than half of our pleasure is due to the fact that the bird is

"The same that in my schoolboy days I listened to."

and to such a one we can say--

"I can listen to thee yet,

Can lie upon the plain

And listen, till I do beget

That golden time again."

It is time that we Australians fought against the generally received

opinion that the dominant note of our scenery is weird melancholy.

This is the note sounded mainly by those who were bred elsewhere, who

came to us with other associations and other traditions, and sojourned

among us. It will not be the opinion of the native-born when they find

appropriate speech.

"Whence doth the mournful keynote start?

From the pure depths of Nature's heart?

Or, from the heart of him who sings,

And deems his hand upon the strings,

Is Nature's own?"

This little book should do much to popularize bird-study and to spread

a knowledge of our common birds among our people. I hope devoutly that

an effort will be made to give them suitable names. We should give

them names a poet or a child can use. A Chaucer poring lovingly over

his favorite flower, the daisy, could call it by a name which is

itself full of poetry. Even the unimaginative clown, Nick Bottom,

could sing of

"The Ouzel Cock, so black of hue,

With orange-tawny bill,

The Throstle with his note so true,

The Wren with little quill,

The Finch, the Sparrow, and the Lark,

The plain-song Cuckoo gray."

And a Burns can invoke the Throstle in lines as musical as the song of

the bird itself--"And thou mellow mavis, that hails the night-fa'."

But how shall an Australian bard sing of "The Red-rumped Acanthiza,"

or of that delightful songster, "The Rufous-breasted Thickhead"?

Australian Nature-poetry will be handicapped until our children give

names like "Bobolink," and "Chickadee," and "Whip-poor-will," and

"Jacky Winter," to our birds.

"Oriel," in the _Argus_, some time ago, showed how hard it is to write

of love's young dream in Australian verse.

"Sweetheart, we watched the evening sky grow pale,

And drowsy sweetness stole away our senses,

While ran adown the swamp the Pectoral Rail,

The shy Hypotaenidia philippinensis.

"How sweet a thing is love! Sweet as the rose,

Fragrant as flowers, fair as the sunlight beaming!

Only the Sooty Oyster-Catcher knows

How sweet to us, as there we lingered dreaming.

"Dear, all the secret's ours. The Sharp-tailed Stint

Spied, but he will not tell--though you and I

Paid Cupid's debts from Love's own golden mint,

While Yellow-Bellied Shrike-Tits fluttered nigh.

"The Honey-eaters heard; the Fuscous--yea,

The Warty-faced, the Lunulated, too;

But this kind feathered tribe will never say

What words you said to me, or I to you.

"The golden bloom was glorious in the furze,

And gentle twittering came from out the copses;

It was the Carinated Flycatchers,

Or else the black Monarcha melanopsis.

"That day our troth we plighted--blissful hour,

Beginning of a joy a whole life long!

And while the wide world seemed to be in flower,

The Chestnut-rumped Ground-Wren burst forth in song."

It surely would not be amiss if the Bird Observers' Clubs throughout

Australia, and the Royal Australasian Ornithologists' Union, enlisted

the aid of the State Education Departments, and endeavored to find out

what names the children use for the birds of their district. Executive

committees upon bird names are good; but a good name is not evoked by

arguments in committee. It ofttimes comes from the happy inspiration

of some child who loves the bird. At present the names given by

classifiers are often an offence. A few evenings ago I was charmed

with an unaccustomed song coming from out a big pittosporum tree in

my garden at Kew. I took careful note of the little warbler, and then

consulted Mr. Leach's _Descriptive List_. Judge of my satisfaction

when I found that my little friend was "The Striated Field Wren or

Stink Bird"!

The Australian boy is responding splendidly to the Nature-study

movement. Bird observers tell me that shy native birds, formerly

unknown near the haunts of men, are making their appearance,

feeling safer now from molestation. Nest hunting for the sake of egg

spoliation is happily becoming rarer, although children are developing

keener eyes for nests. To-day every country school has its nests

under loving observation for the purposes of bird-study and of

bird-protection. Walt Whitman might have been describing many a

Victorian school boy when he wrote--

"And every day the he-bird, to and fro, near at hand,

And every day the she-bird, crouched on her nest, silent, with bright eyes,

And every day, I, a curious boy, never too close, never disturbing them,

Cautiously peering, absorbing, translating."

This loving study must bear good fruit. If we believe the scientific

men, Australia is, _par excellence_, the land of birds, song-birds,

plumage-birds, and birds of wonderful interest, such as the Satin

Bower Bird. The collection of Australian birds in our National Museum

at Melbourne is certainly one of the finest sights of the city, and it

should be studied by all who wish to know how favored this continent

is in bird distribution. But we must get to know and to love our

feathered friends. Mr. Leach in his lecture has dwelt sufficiently on

the economic and scientific value of bird-study. Let me enter a plea

for bird-study as a source of aesthetic pleasure. Before our Australian

birds can be to us what the Thrush and the Blackbird and the Linnet

and the Lark and the Nightingale are to the British boy, we must have

a wealth of association around them from song and story. And this

association must grow up with us from childhood if it is to make

the strongest appeal to us. It can rarely be acquired in later life.

British birds owe much to the poets for the charm that surrounds them.

When I heard the Nightingale in England, although I had no association

with it gathered from my boyhood's days, I heard more than the bird's

song. I was listening to Keats and Wordsworth and Shakespeare as well.

There is something very fine in the thought that such bird songs go on

for ever, that these immortal birds are "not made for death," that

"The voice I hear this passing night was heard

In ancient days by emperor and clown:

Perhaps the self-same song that found a path

Through the sad heart of Ruth, when, sick for home,

She stood in tears amid the alien corn."

The Nightingale's song, as a bird song, I thought disappointing.

I remember having the same feeling with regard to the Thrush and

Blackbird. The charm of their songs is largely in the associations

they evoke. Our city children are now growing up in familiarity with

these two birds, which are becoming as common in our gardens as in

England. And wherever they go they carry so much that is fine in

literature with them. But there has not yet been time for our native

birds to endear themselves to us. And so we hear only their song. Wise

Shakespeare says--

"How many things by season seasoned are

To their right praise and true perfection."

* * * * * * *

"The Nightingale, if she should sing by day,

When every goose is cackling, would be thought

No better a musician than the Wren."

He knows that to the song of the bird must be its appropriate setting,

and that when Nature has done her part there is still much to be

supplied by ourselves.

The outlook is, however, a hopeful one. Nature-study is bringing our

boys and girls into kindlier relationships with our birds; suitable

popular names will be forthcoming for them; our poets will sing of

them; our nursery rhymes and our children's tales will tell of them;

and the time will come when even the birds now trying so hard to

sing their way into our hearts, while cursed with the names of

"Rufous-breasted Thickhead" and "Striated Field Wren or Stink Bird,"

will mean to an Australian what "the Throstle with his note so true"

and "the Wren with little quill" do to an Englishman.

Mr. Leach's valuable little book is a powerful contribution to this

much-to-be-desired result.

FRANK TATE.

NAMES RECENTLY AMENDED

By Gregory Mathews.

_The following were not included in the text._

The numbers 70, 74, and so on refer to the numbers of the birds.

20 _Rallus pectoralis._

65-66 _Genus Thalasseus._

70 _Sterna fuscata._

74 _Catharacta._

75 _Catharacta parasitica._

76 _Morinella interpres._

80 _Lobibyx novae hollandiae._

82 _Squatarola squatarola._

83-89 _Genus Charadrius._

90 _Hypsibates_

95 _Numenius minutus._

96 _Limosa baueri._

97 _Limosa melanuroides._

98 _Tringa hypoleuca._

99 _Tringa nebularia._

100 _Arenaria leucophaea._

101 _Erolia ruficollis._

102 _Erolia aurita._

103 _Erolia ferruginea._

104 _Canutus canutus._

105 _Canutus magnus._

110 _Choriotis australis._

111 _Mathewsia rubicunda._

114 _Egatheus falcinellus._

117 _Egretta plumifera._

118 _Egretta timoriensis._

121 _Egretta nigripes._

122 _Demigretta sacra._

124 _Ixobrychus pusillus._

126 _Chenopis atrata._

132 _Tadorna tadornoides._

134 _Nettion castaneum._

139 _Nyroca australis._

140 _Oxyura australis._

142-146 _Genus, Carbo._

157 _Astur cirrhocephalus._

171 _Ieracidea berigora._

172 _Ieracidea orientalis._

179-183 _Genus, Tyto._

185-187 _Genus, Glossopsitta._

191 _Genus, Callocephalon._

192-194 _Genus, Cacatoees._

195 _Licmetis tenuirostris._

196 _Calopsitta novae-hollandiae._

198 _Polytelis anthopeplus._

208 _Neophema chrysostoma._

213 _Lathamus discolor._

225 _Eurostopodus albigularis._

228 _Apus pacificus._

229 _Cuculus pallidus._

232 _Misocalius palliolatus._

PREFACE.

This little volume is intended as a pocket book for field use, so

that the many teachers, nature-students, nature-lovers, schoolboys,

schoolgirls, and boy scouts, who like to "_see_ what they _look at_,"

may be able to name the birds they meet.

The first step towards knowing the birds is a _desire_ to know them;

this will grow if a person is interested; so our first business, as

in all nature-study work, is to arouse _interest_. Interest follows at

once, as we have often found, if a person realizes that what is about

him or her is worthy of study.

To arouse this necessary interest, a lecture on Australian birds is

given in such a form that it may be repeated, if desired.

The second requisite is a handy descriptive list of the birds that are

likely to be seen. This has been written in simple language, so that

the schoolboy and non-expert can use it.

Thus, our aims are two:--

1. To show that Australian birds are of interest.

2. To supply, in a convenient form, a list of the birds which

are likely to be seen, and the marks by means of which they

may be identified.

This little book contains illustrations and descriptions of--

100% of the birds found in Victoria.

92.5% .. .. .. .. .. .. .. South Australia.

87.3% .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Tasmania.

82.5% .. .. .. .. .. .. .. New South Wales.

78.16%.. .. .. .. .. .. .. W. Australia (S. and C.).

78.15%.. .. .. .. .. .. .. Queensland.

The balance of those found in each of the other States is made up

mainly of birds closely related to those of which illustrations are

given, or of very rare birds restricted to a small area.

The families of the birds of the world have been included, so that the

observer can see where the bird he is observing is placed amongst the

world's birds. He will also be enabled to place near its Australian

relatives birds he reads about. The Australian birds only are grouped

in orders.

Mr. H. Wilson, Nature-study Lecturer, Training College, superintended

the painting of the birds, and saw the book through the press.

_A Hand-List of Birds_: Dr. Sharpe; and _A Hand-List of the Birds

of Australasia_: Gregory M. Mathews, have been followed for

classification and distribution.

But for the interest of the Minister of Education, the Hon. A. A.

Billson, and the Director, Mr. F. Tate, M.A., I.S.O., this little

book would not have been possible. Further, Mr. Billson suggested the

colored illustrations, while Mr. Tate has written the introduction,

read the proof-sheets and assisted at all stages.

PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.

In response to requests from beginners, a table has been added on page

190. This table shows the page on which a bird of a certain size may

be found.

Pending the completion by the Royal Australasian Ornithologists' Union

of its official _Check-list of the Birds of Australia_, the scientific

names have been left as in the first edition.

NOTES.

Where one number is placed over another at the left side of the page,

the lower number denotes the number of species of that genus found in

the world; the upper denotes the number of species found in Australia

and Tasmania.

The number at the right side of the page is the length of the bird in

inches (from the tip of bill to the tip of tail).

The families of birds known are numbered consecutively, thus, F. 11,

F. 12, and so on. The number after a family name denotes the number of

species recorded from Australia and Tasmania. The distribution of

the species of each family amongst the six zoogeographical regions is

shown thus:

F. 17. COLUMBIDAE (2), WOOD PIGEONS, Passenger-Pigeon, Rock-Dove,

119 sp.--41(40)A., 25(17)O., 18(10)P., 19(17)E., 4(0)Nc., 24(20)Nl.

This should read: Family number 17 of the world's birds, COLUMBIDAE

(two of which are found in Australia and Tasmania) contains the Wood

Pigeons, including the Passenger-Pigeon (of North America) and the

Rock-Dove (of Europe). It comprises 119 species, of which 41 are found

in the Australian Region, 40 of them being confined to this region;

25 are found in the Oriental Region, 17 being confined to it; 18 are

found in the Palaearctic Region, 10 of which are not found outside

the region; 19 have been recorded from the Ethiopian Region, 17

being peculiar to that region; 4 have been recorded from the Nearctic

Region, none of which is restricted to the region; 24 have been

recorded from the Neotropical Region, 20 being peculiar to it.

The name in black type is the name accepted by the Australasian

Association for the Advancement of Science in 1898, and amended by the

"names" sub-committee of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists' Union,

1911. This name should be used to denote the bird. Many local names

are given, so that a person knowing a bird by one of these may

discover its proper name.

A.--Australian Region (from Wallace's Line to Sandwich Islands

and New Zealand, see map p. 10).

O.--Oriental (Indian) Region (India to Wallace's Line).

P.--Palaearctic Region (Europe, N.W. Africa, and Northern and

Western Asia, except Arabia).

E.--Ethiopian Region (Arabia and Africa, except N.W.).

Nc.--Nearctic Region. ("_The A.O.U. Check-List of North

American Birds, 1910_" has been followed in making this North

America, less Mexico).

Nl.--Neotropical Region (South America, with Mexico).

A.O.U.--American Ornithologists' Union; R.A.O.U--Royal

Australasian Ornithologists' Union.

A. denotes found throughout Australia; E.A. denotes found

in Queensland, N.S.W., and Victoria; S.A. denotes South

Australia; C.A. denotes Central Australia; W.A.

denotes Western Australia; N. Ter.--Northern Territory;

Mal.--Malaysia; Mol.--Molucca Is.; N. Cal.--New Caledonia;

N. Heb.--New Hebrides; N.G.--New Guinea; N.Z.--New Zealand;

Br.--British; T.--Tasmania.

Nom.--Nomadic; Mig.--Migratory; Part. Mig.--Partly Migratory;

Stat.--Stationary; exc.--except; acc.--accidental.

C.--common; v.c.--very common; r.--rare; v.r.--very rare;

u.--unlikely that the ordinary observer will see it.

* means see colored illustration.

f.--female; m.--male; f., sim.--f. is similar in color and

size.

=vt. Eur. denotes that the Australian bird is closely similar

in form, habits, &c., to the corresponding European bird.

=vt. cos. denotes that it is the equivalent or representative

of a cosmopolitan group of birds.

1

4

=6* King Quail= (Chestnut-bellied, Least, Dwarf), reads "No. 6

(see colored illustration) is the King Quail, called also the

Chestnut-bellied Quail, Least Quail, and Dwarf Quail. Four of

this genus are known in the world, of which one is found in

Australia."

(e) denotes that a name is used in error.

* * * * *

A Yellow-tailed Tit-Warbler is about 4 in. long; a White-eye, 4.5 in.;

a Sparrow, 5 in.; a House-Swallow, 6.5 in.; a Sordid Wood-Swallow,

7 in.; a Black and White Fantail, 7.5 in.; a Starling, 8.5 in.;

a Harmonious Shrike-Thrush, 9.5 in.; a Noisy Miner, 10 in.; a

Magpie-Lark, 10.5 in.; a Butcher-Bird, 11 in.; a Pallid Cuckoo, 12in.;

a Rosella, 12.5 in.; a Galah, 14 in.; a Wattle-Bird, 14.5 in.;

a Laughing Kingfisher, 17.5 in.; a White-backed Magpie, 18 in.; and a

Crow, 20 in. (measured from the tip of tail to the tip of bill).

Don't try to judge a bird's length in inches.

Note one or two prominent markings, and the size of a bird; say,

larger than a Starling, but smaller than a Magpie-Lark. Then get the

length of these birds from the table above (8-1/2 in. and 10-1/2 in.

respectively), and compare the description of each bird that comes

between these lengths with the illustrations and the bird before you.

The birds are approximately relative size on each block.

Use the index to find the page of a bird, then use the number, if

asterisked, to find the bird in the colored plate index.

[Illustration: THE WORLD Showing REGIONS]

=An Australian Bird Book.=

* * * * *

A LECTURE.

Australia is the wonderland of the scientist and of the Nature-lover.

It is a great living "museum," stocked with marvels of many kinds,

including so-called "living fossils," the sole survivors of otherwise

extinct groups of animals.

Competent authorities have proposed to divide the world, biologically,

into two parts--Australia and the rest of the world, and they have

considered Australia the more important part.

This division was based mainly on the study of mammals--animals which

suckle their young--for Australia is the home of the two surviving

members of the lowest group of mammals--Monotremata, the egg-laying

Platypus (_Ornithorhynchus_), and the Spiny Ant-eater (_Echidna_).

Further, marsupials, except for two kinds found in America, are

confined to this long-isolated southern land.

Here, shut off from the severe competition experienced by the animals

of northern lands, marsupials were modified so that they were adapted

for life in almost every realm utilized by the higher mammals of other

countries. Thus there are herbivorous, carnivorous, and insectivorous

marsupials. Owing, probably, to the advent of Bats--true flying

mammals--at, possibly, a comparatively early time, the marsupial was

beaten in the air, and so a true flying form was not evolved, though

the so-called "Flying Phalanger" is some distance on the way.

As regards the other group of flying animals--birds--Australia is even

of greater interest, for here are found unique archaic forms of life,

such as the Emu, Cassowary, Mound-Builders, and Lyre-Birds, and

"every widely-spread family of birds but two is represented; the only

widely-spread families of birds totally absent from Australia

are Woodpeckers and Vultures." Woodpeckers, however, have crossed

Wallace's line into Celebes and adjacent islands, and may yet reach

Australia naturally.

Further, many well-known birds, such as Pigeons, Parrots, and

Kingfishers, reach their highest development in the Australian region,

and, more important still, the whole bird world seems to reach its

culminating point in this wonderland. It is a factor adding to the

interest of Australia's fauna that three of the four families placed

at the head of the bird world in the natural system of classification

adopted by ornithologists, and used by Dr. Sharpe in his just recently

completed _Hand-List of Birds_, should be absolutely confined to the

Australian Continent and adjacent islands. Thus Australia can justly

claim to be the most highly developed of regions, so far as birds

are concerned, for Bower-Birds, Birds of Paradise, and Bell-Magpies

(_Streperas_) are peculiar, while the penultimate family--the Crow

family--is shared with the other regions of the world.

Thus, with regard to birds, the term "fossil continent" applied to

Australia is not appropriate, as it is but partly true.

Since the birds native to Australia are so interesting in themselves,

and are so varied in kind, Australians should know, love, and

jealously protect these beautiful creatures. Strict regulations should

be framed to prevent the exploitation of Nature's gifts by those who

destroy useful or precious and rare birds for the sake of gain. Even

collectors, who, under the guise of scientific work, collect eggs, and

kill birds to trade in their skins, should be supervized.

Let us now consider the different groups of birds. Living birds were

formerly divided into two sub-classes--(1) _Ratitae_ (Lat., _ratis_, a

raft), and (2) _Carinatae_ (Lat., _carina_, a keel). The first is

the small group of flightless, running birds, made up of five living

birds, all inhabiting southern lands. These are the Emu and Cassowary

of Australia, the Ostrich of South Africa, the Rhea or South American

Ostrich, and the Kiwi or Apteryx of New Zealand. Taken together with

other evidence, all pointing in the same way, these birds have led

scientists to think of a great southern land mass connecting the

southern lands, for the Emu did not fly here, nor did the Rhea fly

to South America, but they must have reached their present home by a

land-bridge not necessarily complete at any one time. As these birds

do not fly, they have no big wing-muscles, and so do not need the

ridge of bone down the breast. Thus they belong to the sub-class, the

members of which have a raft-like breast bone. The other living birds

were placed in the sub-class the members of which have a keel on the

breast bone for the attachment of the wing-muscles.

Recently, however, Pycraft, a leading ornithologist, has proposed to

base the division into sub-classes on the characters of the bones of

the palate instead of those of the breast-bone. Thus, he places the

sixth family of birds--the Tinamous, of South America--with the ratite

birds, to form his primitive group--_Palaeognathae_ ("old jaw"), while

the members of the old sub-class _Carinatae_, minus the Tinamous,

constitute his second division, the _Neognathae_ ("new jaw").

Mr. Gregory Mathews, the first part of whose projected great work

on Australian Birds has just come to hand, has followed Dr. Bowdler

Sharpe in accepting this classification, so we must follow too, as

Mathews' work will probably be our standard for years to come. The

large number of Australian birds belonging to this second sub-class is

now divided into 20 orders, which with the Emu order, make a total of

21 orders of birds represented in Australia.

Now, let us consider the birds in each order. The best-known member

of the first Australian order is the Emu, a bird well known to all,

though, unfortunately, becoming very rare, so that few persons in the

settled districts now enjoy the privilege of seeing an Emu in a wild

state.

====

[Page 12]

[Illustration: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]]

CLASS.--AVES.--BIRDS.

Sub-Class I.--Palaeognathae.

Ratitae and Tinamidae.

F. 1. _Rheidae_, Rhea, 3 sp. Nl.

F. 2. _Struthionidae_, Ostrich, 4 sp.--4(3)E., 1(0)P. (S.

Palestine).

ORDER I.--CASUARIIFORMES.

F. 3. DROMAEIDAE (1), EMU, 1 sp. A.

1

1

=1 Emu=, _Dromaius novae-hollandiae_, A.

Stat. r. plains 78

See diagram, second largest living bird; f., smaller. Fruits,

grass.

F. 4. CASUARIIDAE (1), CASSOWARY, 17 sp. A.

F. 5. _Apterygidae_, Apteryx, Kiwi, 6 sp. A. (N.Z.).

F. 6. _Tinamidae_, Tinamous, 69 sp. Nl.

Sub-Class II.--Neognathae.

Carinatae, minus Tinamidae.

====

The birds of the second order are well known as "scratchers." They

include the domestic fowl, which has been derived from the wild jungle

fowl of India, and other fowl, such as the peafowl. Quail are also

included here; so are Pheasants. The absence of Pheasants from

Australia is more than compensated for by the presence of the

Mound-Builders. These marvellous birds, Brush Turkeys and Mallee-Fowl,

retain the reptilian characteristic of not sitting on their eggs. Thus

the young have never known their parents. The eggs are laid in a huge

mound of sand and earth, which contains rotting vegetation. The

heat of decomposition in this remarkable natural incubator, is quite

sufficient to hatch the eggs. The young are born fully feathered, able

to run at once, and able to fly the day they leave the mound. Contrast

their stage of development with that of a pigeon born naked, blind,

and helpless, and that of a chick born clothed with down and able to

run about. There is an interesting connexion between the size of

an egg and the state of development of the young bird at birth. The

pigeon lays a relatively small egg, so the young pigeon does not

develop far in the egg, and requires much maternal care. The hen's egg

is larger, and the chick is more fully developed. The Mallee-Hen's egg

is enormous, and so the young can develop much further before birth.

This bird, unfortunately, is doomed to early extinction, for the

fox has discovered the rich store of food in the eggs, and country

dwellers have also discovered that they are delicate in flavor, and

are good food. It is hoped that the scrubby western end of Kangaroo

Island, where foxes are unknown, will prove a suitable sanctuary

for them. These birds, which rank among Nature's wonders, are almost

confined to the Australian region. One is found in Borneo and the

Philippines, while a second is confined to the distant Nicobar

Islands. Twenty-six live in Australia and its neighboring islands. One

of these has spread across Wallace's line to the small Kangean Island,

near Java. The Stubble Quail, a member of the Pheasant family, is

nearly identical with the British Quail. Mathews and Campbell make the

King Quail a sub-species of the Chinese Quail.

Quail are favorite sporting birds, but when one considers that they

are worth about 9d. each as table or game birds, and that sportsmen

found at Birregurra, that the crops of Quail were full of crickets,

and at Kerang the Quail contained numbers of a species of weevil, it

is doubtful if it is wise policy to shoot this insect-eating bird.

Although it may be worth a few pence as a table bird; it is worth many

shillings as a pest destroyer.

====

[Page 13]

ORDER II.--GALLIFORMES.

F. 7. MEGAPODIIDAE (4), Mound-Builders, Scrub-Fowl, Brush

Turkey, Megapode, 28 sp.--27(25)A., 3(1)O.

1

1

=2* Mallee-Fowl=, Lowan, Native Pheasant, Pheasant (e),

_Leipoa ocellata_, N.S.W., V., S.A., W.A.

Stat. r. _mallee scrubs_ 24

Like a small turkey; neck light fawn-gray; back, wings spotted

white, black, brown; f., smaller. Seeds, ants.

F. 8. _Cracidae_, Curassows, Guans, 59 sp.--1(0)Nc., 59(58)Nl.

F. 9. _Tetraonidae_, Grouse, Capercailly, Ptarmigan,

Prairie-Fowl, 45 sp.--1(0)O., 19(16)P., 28(26)Nc.

F. 10. PHASIANIDAE (6), Pheasants, Partridges, Peafowl,

Domestic Fowls, 242 sp.--12(10)A., 137(119)O., 47(31)P.,

64(58)E.

1

6

=3* Stubble Quail= (Pectoral), _Coturnix pectoralis_, A., T.

=vt. Eur. Quail.

Nom. c. _stubble_, _grass_ 6.7

Brown lined white, black; throat dull reddish; breast streaked

black; f., less distinctly marked with black. Weed-seeds,

insects. Rises with a burr-r-r.

3

7

=4* Brown Quail= (Swamp, Partridge), _Synoicus australis_,

N.G., A., T. =vt. Eur. Partridge.

Nom. c. _grassy flats_ 6.5

Upper finely-barred gray, black, chestnut; under buffy-gray

with zigzag black bars; bill blue, tipped black; eyes orange;

f., sim. Seeds, insects. "Bee'e quick."

=5 Tasmanian Quail= (Silver, Greater-Brown), _S. diemenensis_,

V., T. Like 4, but larger.

Nom. r. occ. _thick grass_ 8.5

[Page 14]

[Illustration: [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]]

1

4

=6* King Quail= (Chestnut-bellied, Least, Dwarf, Swamp),

_Excalfactoria chinensis lineata_, Philippines, Sumatra to A.

exc. W.A.; sub-species of Chinese Quail.

Nom. r. _swamps_ 4.5

Back dark-brown; breast blue-gray; abdomen chestnut; throat

black, white bands conspicuous; 1-1/4 oz.; f., dark-brown,

spotted black; throat whitish; under barred black. Weed-seeds,

insects.

F. 11. _Numididae_, Guinea-Fowls, 23 sp. E.

F. 12. _Meleagridae_, Turkeys, 5 sp.--4(2)Nc., 3(1)Nl.

F. 13. _Odontophoridae_, American Quails, Bob-Whites, 72

sp.--18(10)Nc., 62(54)Nl.

====

Order III. comprises the 26 Bustard Quail and the peculiar Australian

Plain Wanderer. Only the last species of this Bustard Quail family,

the Australian Plain Wanderer has the hind toe. The females of this

order of birds do the fighting.

In Quail, the rule often observed amongst birds that the male is

larger and more beautiful than the female may be reversed, for here

the female is sometimes larger and the more conspicuously colored. In

association with this reversal of color and size, the domestic habits

are changed, for, in some species at least, the female sits on

the eggs but a very short time; the male then finishes the task of

incubating, and brings up and educates the young family. Meantime, the

female has found another mate and another clutch of eggs is left to

the care of the male.

In birds having both sexes the same color each bird usually does its

share of domestic work, sitting on the eggs, feeding the young, etc.

Where the male is more brightly colored, he, as a rule, does not

sit on the eggs, for he would be visible to a bird of prey sailing

overhead, and so would probably be killed and the eggs taken. The

great naturalist, Alfred Russel Wallace, thus regards the quiet

coloration of most female birds as a protection during the nesting

season. The gaudy coloration of many male birds has been explained by

Darwin as being due to sexual selection, the female choosing as a mate

the most gaily colored or most attractive bird.

Though the sitting bird is usually protectively colored, it was our

good fortune, on a Summer School excursion, attended by His Excellency

the Governor (Sir Thomas Gibson-Carmichael), a keen Nature-lover,

and the Director of Education (Mr. F. Tate), to find the

gorgeously-colored male Golden-breasted Whistler (Thickhead) sitting

on the eggs in full daylight. It was noted, however, that the open

nest was unusually well protected by an overhead bushy branch.

====

[Page 15]

ORDER III.--TURNICIFORMES, HEMIPODES.

F. 14. TURNICIDAE (8), Button (Bustard) Quail, 27

sp.--14(14)A., 9(6)O., 3(0)P., 4(4)E.

7

26

=7 Red-Backed Quail= (Black-backed, Orange-breasted), _Turnix

maculosa_, Cel., N.G., N.A., E.A., S.A.

Nom. r. _marshy_ 7

Back brown; crown blackish; sides, breast large black spots;

abdomen lighter; no hind toe; f., larger. Weed-seeds, insects.

=8* Painted Quail= (Speckled, Butterfly), Varied Turnix, New

Holland Partridge (e), _T. varia_, A., T.

Nom. r. _sandy_ 8

Upper rufous-brown with buff, black lines; breast, face

spotted; no hind toe; f., larger. Weed-seeds, insects.

=9 Red-chested Quail= (Chestnut-breasted, Yellow), _T.

pyrrhothorax_, A. exc. W.A.

Nom. v.r. _marshy_ 6

Upper dark-brown with buff, black lines; breast sandy-red;

abdomen whitish; no hind toe; f., much larger, brighter.

Weed-seeds, insects.

=10 Little Quail= (Dottrel, Swift-flying, Button), _T. velox_, A.

Nom. c. _open plains_ 5.5

Upper rufous with chestnut, black lines; breast rufous;

abdomen white; no hind toe; f., much larger. Weed-seeds,

insects.

1

1

=11* Plain Wanderer=, Turkey Quail, _Pedionomus torquatus_, A.

exc. W.A.

Mig. r. _grass_, m., 4.8; f., 6.3

Brown; broad black, white spotted collar; light band on wing;

breast chestnut; hind toe; m., smaller, paler, faint collar.

Weed-seeds, insects.

F. 15. _Pteroclididae_, Sand-Grouse, Rock-Pigeons (e), 17

sp.--7(2)O., 8(1)P., 12(7)E.

====

In Order IV. come those well-known birds--the "Cooers," Pigeons and

Doves. The Australian region is the great stronghold of these often

beautiful birds. It is only in this region that members of each of the

five families of living Pigeons are found. Two of the five families

are peculiar to the region, and nearly half the kinds of Pigeons known

are found here. The finest and largest of all Pigeons are the large

Crowned Pigeons of New Guinea. Unfortunately, the heads of these

Pigeons are much in demand for millinery. Would that fashionable women

knew the cruelty and devastation wrought by such fashions!

Amongst the most beautiful of Pigeons are, as Dr. Newton remarked,

the common Bronzewing Pigeons of Australia and Tasmania. The lovely

Fruit-Pigeons of East Australian scrubs are, perhaps, the most

beautiful of all, so it will readily be seen how fortunate we are with

regard to these birds.

The fine large Wonga-Wonga Pigeon is becoming rare. Its flesh is

white, so Gould named it _Leucosarcia_ (white flesh). It has been

proposed to introduce this bird into Europe to breed for table

purposes.

====

[Page 16]

[Illustration: [12] [12^A] [13] [14] [15] [16]]

ORDER IV.--COLUMBIFORMES, PIGEONS, DOVES.

F. 16. TRERONIDAE (8), FRUIT-PIGEONS, 228 sp--159(155)A.,

60(56)O., 1(1)P., 12(12)E.

2

2

=12 Topknot Pigeon=, _Lopholaimus antarcticus_, E.A., T.

(acc.) "Quook-quook."

Stat. c. _thick brushes_ 17

"This noble pigeon;" under silvery-gray; upper dark-gray;

crest rust-red; eyes orange; f., sim. Native fruits.

[Page 17]

F. 17. COLUMBIDAE (2), WOOD-PIGEONS, Passenger-Pigeon,

Rock-Dove, 119 sp.--41(40)A., 25(17)O., 18(10)P., 19(17)E.,

4(0)Nc., 24(20)Nl.

F. 18. PERISTERIDAE (15), GROUND-PIGEONS, Turtle-Doves, 198

sp.--61(55)A., 21(8)O., 10(1)P., 32(30)E., 10(0)Nc., 86(76)Nl.

1

6

An Australian Bird Book: A Pocket Book for Field Use · 第 1 / 15 段