CHAPTER XXXV.

FOUNDATION OF TEMPERANCE SOCIETIES IN THE NEIGHBORING

PARISHES—PROVIDENTIAL ARRIVAL OF MONSIGNOR DE FORBIN JANSON, BISHOP OF

NANCY—HE PUBLICLY DEFENDS ME AGAINST THE BISHOP OF QUEBEC, AND FOREVER

BREAKS THE OPPOSITION OF THE CLERGY.

The people of Beauport had scarcely been a year enrolled under the

banners of temperance, when the seven thriving taverns of that parish

were deserted and their owners forced to try some more honorable trade

for a living. This fact, published by the whole press of Quebec, more

than anything forced the opponents, especially among the clergy, to

silence, without absolutely reconciling them to my views. However, it

was becoming every day more and more evident to all that the good done

in Beauport was incalculable, both in a material and moral point of

view. Several of the best thinking people of the surrounding parishes

began to say to one another: “Why should we not try to bring into our

midst this temperance reformation which is doing so much good in

Beauport?” The wives of drunkards would say: “Why does not our curate do

here, what the curate of Beauport has done there?”

On a certain day, one of those unfortunate women, who had received, with

a good education, a rich inheritance, which her husband had spent in

dissipation, came to tell me that she had gone to her curate to ask him

to establish a temperance society in his parish, as we had done in

Beauport; but he had told her “to mind her own business.” She had then

respectfully requested him to invite me to come and help to do for his

parishioners what I had done for mine, but she had been sternly rebuked

at the mention of my name. The poor woman was weeping, when she said:

“Is it possible that our priests are so indifferent to our sufferings,

and that they will let the demon of drunkenness torture us as long as we

live, when God gives us such an easy and honorable way to destroy his

power for ever?”

My heart was touched by the tears of that lady, and I said to her: “I

know a way to put an end to the opposition of your curate, and force him

to bring among you the reformation you so much desire; but it is a very

delicate matter for me to mention to you. I must rely upon your sacred

promise of secrecy, before opening my mind to you on that subject.”

“I take my God to witness,” she answered, “that I will never reveal your

secret.” “Well, madame, if I can rely upon your discretion and secrecy,

I will tell you an infallible way to force your priest to do what has

been done here.”

“Oh! for God’s sake,” she said, “tell me what to do.”

I replied: “The first time you go to confession, say to your priest that

you have a new sin to confess which is very difficult to reveal to him.

He will press you more to confess it. You will then say:

“‘Father, I confess I have lost confidence in you.’ Being asked ‘Why?’

you will tell him: ‘Father, you know the bad treatment I have received

from my drunken husband, as well as hundreds of other wives in your

parish from theirs; you know the tears we have shed on the ruin of our

children, who are destroyed by the bad example of their drunken fathers;

you know the daily crimes and unspeakable abominations caused by the use

of intoxicating drinks; you could dry our tears and make us happy wives

and mothers, you could convert our husbands and save our children, by

establishing the society of temperance here, as it is in Beauport, and

you refuse to do it. How, then, can I believe you are a good priest, and

that there is any charity and compassion in you for us?’

“Listen with a respectful silence to what he will tell you; accept his

penance, and when he asks you if you regret that sin, answer him that

you cannot regret it till he has taken the providential means which God

offers him to convert the drunkards.

“Get as many other women whom you know are suffering as you do, as you

can, to go and confess to him the same thing; and you will see that his

obstinancy will melt as the snow before the rays of the sun in May.”

She was a very intelligent lady: She saw at once that she had in hand an

irresistible power to force her priest out of his shameful and criminal

indifference to the welfare of his people. A fortnight later she came to

tell me that she had done what I had advised her, and that more than

fifty other respectable women had confessed to their curate that they

had lost confidence in him, on account of his lack of zeal and charity

for his people.

My conjectures were correct. The poor priest was beside himself, when

forced, every day, to hear from the very lips of his most respectable

female parishioners, that they were losing confidence in him. He feared

lest he should lose his fine parish near Quebec, and be sent to some of

the backwoods of Canada.

Three weeks later, he was knocking at my door, where he had not been

since the establishment of the temperance society. He was very pale, and

looked anxious. I could see in his countenance that I owed the honor of

this visit to his fair penitents. However, I was happy to see him. He

was considered a good priest, and had been one of my best friends before

the formation of the temperance society. I invited him to dine with me,

and made him feel at home as much as possible, for I knew by his

embarrassed manner that he had a very difficult proposition to make. I

was not mistaken. He at last said:

“Mr. Chiniquy, we had, at first, great prejudices against your

temperance society; but we see its blessed fruits in the great

transformation of Beauport. Would you be kind enough to preach a retreat

of temperance, during three days, to my people, as you have done here?”

I answered: “Yes, sir; with the greatest pleasure. But it is on

condition that you will yourself be an example of the sacrifice, and the

first to take the solemn pledge of temperance, in the presence of your

people.”

“Certainly,” he answered; “for the pastor must be an example to his

people.”

Three weeks later, his parish had nobly followed the example of

Beauport, and the good curate had no words to express his joy. Without

losing a day, he went to the two other curates of what is called “La

Cote de Beaupre,” persuaded them to do what he had done, and six weeks

after, all the saloons from Beauport to St. Joachim were closed; and it

would have been difficult, if not impossible, to persuade any one in

that whole region to drink a glass of any intoxicating drink.

Little by little, the country priests were thus giving up their

prejudices, and were bravely rallying around our glorious banners of

temperance. But my bishop, though less severe, was still very cold

toward me. At last, the good providence of God forced him, through a

great humiliation, to count our society among the greatest spiritual and

temporal blessings of the age.

At the end of August, 1840, the public press informed us that the Count

de Forbin Janson, Bishop de Nancy, in France, was just leaving New York

for Montreal. That bishop, who was the cousin and minister to Charles

the Tenth, had been sent into exile by the French people, after the king

had lost his crown in the Revolution of 1830. Father Mathew had told me,

in one of his letters, that this bishop had visited him, and blessed his

work in Ireland, and had also persuaded the Pope to send him his

apostolical benediction.

I saw, at once, the importance of gaining the approbation of this

celebrated man, before he had been prejudiced by the bishop against our

temperance societies. I asked and obtained leave of absence for a few

days, and went to Montreal, which I reached just an hour after the

French bishop. I went immediately to pay my homage to him, told him all

about our temperance work, asking him, in the name of God, to throw

bravely the weight of his great name and position in the scale in favor

of our temperance societies. He promised he would, adding: “I am

perfectly persuaded that drunkenness is not only the great and common

sin of the people, but still more of the priests in America, as well as

in Ireland. The social habit of drinking the detestable and poisonous

wines, brandies and beer used on this continent, and in the northern

parts of Europe, where the vine cannot grow, is so general and strong,

that it is almost impossible to save the people from becoming drunkards,

except through an association in which the elite of society will work

together to change the old and pernicious habits of common life. I have

seen Father Mathew, who is doing an incalculable good in Ireland; and,

be sure of it, I shall do all in my power to strengthen your hands in

that great and good work. But do not say to anybody that you have seen

me.”

Some days later, the Bishop of Nancy was in Quebec, the guest of the

Seminary, and a grand dinner was given in his honor, to which more than

one hundred priests were invited, with the Archbishop of Quebec, his

coadjutor, N. G. Turgeon, and the Bishop of Montreal, M. Q. R. Bourget.

As one of the youngest curates, I had taken the last seat, which was

just opposite the four bishops, from whom I was separated only by the

breadth of the table. When the rich and rare viands had been well

disposed of, and the most delicate fruits had replaced them, bottles of

the choicest wines were brought on the table in incredible numbers. Then

the superior of the college, the Rev. Mr. Demars, knocked on the table

to command silence, and rising on his feet, he said at the top of his

voice: “Please, my lord bishops, and all of you, reverend gentlemen, let

us drink to the health of my Lord Count de Forbin Janson, Primate of

Lorraine and Bishop of Nancy.”

The bottles passing around were briskly emptied into the large glasses

put before every one of the guests. But when the wine was handed to me,

I passed it to my neighbor without taking a drop, and filled my glass

with water. My hope was that nobody had paid any attention to what I had

done; but I was mistaken. The eyes of my bishop, my Lord Signaie, were

upon me. With a stern voice, he said: “Mr. Chiniquy, what are you doing

there? Put wine in your glass, to drink with us the health of Mgr. de

Nancy.”

These unexpected words fell upon me as a thunderbolt, and paralyzed me

with terror. I felt as at the approach of the most terrible tempest I

had ever experienced. My blood ran cold in my veins; I could not utter a

word. For what could I say, there, without compromising myself forever.

To openly resist my bishop, in the presence of such an august assembly,

seemed impossible. But to obey him was also impossible; for I had

promised my God and my country never to drink any wine. I thought, at

first, that I could disarm my superior by my modesty and my humble

silence. However, I felt that all eyes were upon me. A real chill of

terror and unspeakable anxiety was running through my whole frame. My

heart began to beat so violently that I could not breathe. I wished,

then, I had followed my first impression, which was not to come to that

dinner. I think I would have suffocated, had not a few tears rolled down

from my eyes, and helped the circulation of my blood. The Rev. Mr.

Lafrance, who was by me, nudged me, and said: “Do you not hear the order

of my Lord Signaie? Why do you not answer, by doing what you are

requested to do?” I still remained mute, just as if nobody had spoken to

me. My eyes were cast down; I wished then I were dead. The silence of

death, reigning around the tables, told me that every one was waiting

for my answer; but my lips were sealed. After a minute of that silence,

which seemed as long as a whole year, the bishop, with a loud and angry

voice which filled the large room, repeated: “Why do you not put wine in

your glass, and drink to the health of my Lord Forbin Janson, as the

rest of us are doing?”

I felt I could not be silent any longer. “My lord,” I said, with a

subdued and trembling voice, “I have put in my glass what I want to

drink. I have promised my God and my country that I would never drink

any more wine.”

The bishop, forgetting the respect he owed to himself and to those

around him, answered me in the most insulting manner: “You are nothing

but a fanatic, and you want to reform us.”

These words struck me as the shock of a galvanic battery, and

transformed me into a new man. It seemed as if they had added ten feet

to my stature and a thousand pounds to my weight. I forgot that I was

the subject of that bishop, and remembered that I was a man, in the

presence of another man. I raised my head and opened my eyes; as quick

as lightning I rose to my feet, and addressing the Grand Vicar Demars,

superior of the seminary, I said with calmness: “Sir, was it that I

might be insulted at your table that you have invited me here? Is it not

your duty to defend my honor when I am here, your guest? But, as you

seem to forget what you owe to your guests, I will take my own defense

against my unjust aggressor.” Then, turning towards the Bishop de Nancy,

I said: “My Lord de Nancy, I appeal to your lordship from the unjust

sentence of my own bishop. In the name of God, and of His Son, Jesus

Christ, I request you to tell us, here, if a priest cannot, for his

Saviour’s sake, and for the good of his fellow-men, as well as for his

own self-denial, give up forever the use of wine and other intoxicating

drinks, without being abused, slandered and insulted, as I am here, in

your presence?”

It was evident that my words had made a deep impression on the whole

company. A solemn silence followed for a few seconds, which was

interrupted only by my bishop, who said to the Bishop de Nancy: “Yes,

yes, my lord; give us your sentence.”

No words can give an idea of the excitement of every one in that

multitude of priests, who, accustomed from their infancy, abjectly to

submit to their bishop, were, for the first time, in the presence of

such a hand-to-hand conflict between a powerless, humble, unprotected

young curate and his all-powerful, proud and haughty archbishop.

The Bishop of Nancy, at first, refused to grant my request. He felt the

difficulty of his position; but after Bishop Signaie had united his

voice to mine, to press him to give his verdict, he rose and said:

“My Lord Archbishop of Quebec, and you, Mr. Chiniquy, please withdraw

your request. Do not press me to give my views on such a new, but

important subject. It is only a few days since I came in your midst. It

will not do that I should so soon become your judge. The responsibility

of a judgment in such a momentous matter is too great. I cannot accept

it.”

But when the same pressing request was repeated by nine-tenths of that

vast assembly of priests; and that the archbishop pressed him more and

more to pronounce his sentence, he raised his eyes and hands to heaven,

and made a silent but ardent prayer to God. His countenance took an air

of dignity, I might say majesty, which gave him more the appearance of

an old prophet than of a man of our day. Then, casting his eyes upon his

audience, he remained a considerable time, meditating. All eyes were

upon him, anxiously waiting for the sentence. There was an air of

grandeur in him, at that moment, which seemed to tell us that the purest

blood of the great kings of France was flowing in his veins. At last, he

opened his lips, but it was again pressingly to request me to settle the

difficulty with the archbishop among ourselves, and to discharge him of

that responsibility. But we both refused again to grant him his request,

and pressed him to give his judgment. All this time, I was standing,

having publicly said that I would never sit again at that table, unless

that insult was wiped away.

Then he said with unspeakable dignity: “My Lord of Quebec! Here, before

us, is our young priest, Mr. Chiniquy, who, once on his knees, in the

presence of God and his angels, for the love of Jesus Christ, the good

of his own soul and the good of his country, has promised never to

drink! We are the witnesses that he is faithful to his promise, though

he has been pressed to break it by your lordship.

“And because he keeps his pledge with such heroism, your lordship has

called him a fanatic! Now, I am requested by every one here, to

pronounce my verdict on that painful occurrence. Here it is! Mr.

Chiniquy drinks no wine! But, if I look through the past ages, when God

himself was ruling his own people, through his prophets, I see Samson,

who, by the special order of God, never drank wine or any other

intoxicating drink! If from the Old Testament, I pass to the New, I see

John the Baptist, the precursor of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who to obey

the command of God, never drank any wine!! When I look at Mr. Chiniquy,

and see Samson at his right hand to protect him; and John the Baptist at

his left to bless him, I find his position so strong and impregnable,

that I would not dare attack or condemn him!”

These words were pronounced in the most eloquent and dignified manner,

and were listened to with a most respectful and breathless attention.

Bishop de Nancy, keeping his gravity, sat down, emptied his wine glass

into a tumbler, filled it with water, and drank to my health.

The poor archbishop was so completely confounded and humiliated, that

every one felt for him. The few minutes spent at the table, after this

extraordinary act of justice, seemed oppressive to every one. Scarcely

any one dared to look at his neighbor, or speak, except in a low and

subdued tone, as when a great calamity has just occurred.

Nobody thought of drinking his wine; and the health of the Bishop de

Nancy was left undrunk. But a good number of priests filled their

glasses with water, and giving me a silent sign of approbation, drank to

my health.

The society of temperance had been dragged by her enemies to the

battle-field, to be destroyed; but she bravely fought, and gained the

victory. Now, she was called to begin her triumphant march through our

dear Canada.

Fifty Years in the Church of Rome · 第 35 / 67 章