I shall read the last paragraph but one of the affidavit, which says:

“This attitude of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy made it

possible for the Navy, as the only branch of the Armed Forces

until the end of the war, not to have to transfer to the

Peoples’ Court or to a special court any criminal procedures of

political coloring.”

On page 113 in Volume II of my document book I have included a lengthy

extract from Exhibit GB-211, a document of the Prosecution; and this is

an application by the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy addressed to the

Führer and asking for supplies for the construction and repair of naval

and merchant ships. During the interrogation and cross-examination of

Admiral Dönitz this document has already been referred to. I should

merely like to point out that this is a memorandum containing more than

20 pages; the Prosecution took up two points contained therein.

The origin of the document is dealt with in Document Dönitz-46, Page 117

and the following pages. This is an affidavit from the officer who had

drafted this memorandum. I can summarize the contents. The memorandum is

concerned with measures which did not actually come within the sphere of

the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy. It arose on the basis of a

discussion which took place between all departments taking part in the

construction and repair of war and merchant vessels. All these measures

are summarized in this memorandum. The point objected to in particular

by the Prosecution as amounting to a suggestion in favor of punitive

measures against sabotage in shipyards is dealt with in detail on Page

119. I should like to point out particularly that at that time seven out

of eight ships under construction were destroyed by sabotage.

It was not a question of terror measures but of punitive measures

entailing the forfeiting of certain advantages and, if necessary, the

concentration of workers in camps adjoining the shipyards, so as to cut

them off from any sabotage agents.

Following Exhibit GB-209 of the Prosecution, which deals with the

alleged renunciation of the Geneva Convention, I submit Dönitz-48, which

is on Page 122 and the following pages. It will show the model treatment

afforded Allied prisoners of war in the only prisoner-of-war camp which

was under the jurisdiction of Admiral Dönitz as the Commander-in-Chief

of the Navy.

To begin with, the document contains an affidavit from two officers who

dealt with prisoner-of-war affairs in the High Command of the Navy. This

statement is to the effect that all the suggestions of the International

Red Cross regarding these camps were followed.

The next extract is a report by the last commandant of that camp,

Korvettenkapitän Rogge, and I should like to read the second paragraph

from that report:

“In the camp Westertimke there were housed at my time about

5,500 to 7,000, at the end 8,000, prisoners of war and internees

of different nations, mainly members of the British Navy. The

camp had a good reputation, as was generally known. It was the

best in Germany. This was expressly stated at a congress of

British and other prisoner-of-war physicians of all German

camps, which took place in Schwanenwerder near Berlin at the

villa of Goebbels about December 1944. This statement was

confirmed by the British chief camp physician in Westertimke,

Major Dr. Harvey, British Royal Army, whom I am naming as a

witness.”

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 13 · 第 26 / 42 题