CHAPTER II.

BREWING IN NEW YORK.

While the exact date of the beginning of brewing as a distinct calling

cannot be ascertained, there is an abundance of historical evidence

that among the very earliest acts of the Colonial governments, those

tending to encourage the establishment of public breweries were deemed

of the greatest importance. It is no less certain that whenever such

encouragement did not sufficiently stimulate private enterprise to

bring about the desired end, or when other reasons (hereafter to be

explained) made it desirable, the rulers of some of the Colonial

settlements seized upon this source of income themselves or granted

monopolies to those private persons who intended to establish

breweries. Thus Van Twiller, Governor of New Netherland from 1633

to 1638, erected a brewery on the West India Company’s farm, which

extended north from what is now Wall Street to Hudson Street, and the

Patroon of Rensselaerwyck (the present counties of Albany, Columbia and

Rensselaer) established a brewery at Beverwyck (the present Albany),

reserving to himself the exclusive privilege of supplying all licensed

retailers.

As this Director Van Twiller, mentioned above, is reputed to have

been a hard drinker, ever intent on finding or creating a suitable

occasion for indulging in his weakness, it is not hazardous to surmise

that in erecting a brewery, he consulted his own tastes quite as much

as the needs of his little community. His example is said to have

influenced the drinking habits of the colonists to such an extent that

drunkenness became a very common occurrence in the community. Captain

De Vries narrates a number of incidents illustrating the weakness of

Van Twiller, and among them is one which appears to deserve a place

in this little sketch. Cornelius Van Voorst, the stem from which grew

a numerous family famous in Manhattan and Jersey annals, was the

superintendent of the colony of Pavonia, established by Pauwn. He was

a man of hospitable inclinations, and had just imported a hogshead of

Bordeaux wine. The rumor of its excellent quality reached the ears of

Director-General Van Twiller, who, in company with Dominie Bogardus

and Captain De Vries, paid the superintendent a visit by means of a

rowboat. Van Voorst received the representatives of Church, State and

Navy with a princely welcome. The cask was broached and the contents

approved. After some hard drinking, a furious dispute about a recent

murder arose between the host, the Governor and the Dominie. De Vries,

the man of war, in this instance proved to be a man of peace, for by

the exercise of his mediation and more claret, a truce was finally

effected and “they parted good friends.” This is not the dull ending,

but merely the prelude to something more brilliant. Just as his guests

were entering their boat to depart, Van Voorst, to show his good will,

caused a swivel, which was fixed on a pillar near the house, to be

fired. It was a fine salute, but a piece of wadding, falling on the Van

Voorst mansion, set fire to the roof. It was impossible to check the

flames and the house was burned to the ground, presumably destroying

the hogshead of wine.

The business of the tapster necessarily preceded that of the brewer;

for before the colonists could raise a crop of the cereals necessary

for brewing—which they did, by the way, according to Isaac Jogues’

description of Novum Belgium, in the very first year after their

settlement—they had to depend upon the supply of liquors shipped to

them from the mother country; and, from all accounts, we learn that the

quantities thus imported were very large and, to modern minds, entirely

out of proportion to the very scant population of the colony. In the

earliest times, the condition and surroundings of the colonists were

such that all available means of subsistence had to be treated very

much like common property. Thus the West India Company undertook, at

first, to furnish the settlers with what they absolutely needed for

their sustenance,—the understanding being that the value of goods so

furnished must be returned by the borrower as soon as the product of

his labor enabled him to do so. This accounts for the fact that the

first taproom on Manhattan Island was located in the first warehouse

erected by Minuet, then Governor of New Netherland (1626-1633).

[Sidenote: GOVERNOR KIEFT’S CURFEW]

The number of tapsters, under Van Twiller’s administration, increased

rapidly; but there is no evidence that brewing kept pace with this

growth—probably because the importation of wines and liquors from the

mother country still sufficed to satisfy the demand. When, however,

in the first year of his administration (1638), Governor Kieft

forbade the retailing of wines and spirits by the tapsters (virtually

restricting the liquor traffic to the selling of beer) the brewing

trade expanded to such an extent that a few years later an excise upon

its product yielded a considerable revenue. From this time onward,

brewing and retailing formed the subjects of frequent legislation

both in New Netherland and in the New England colonies. The lawmakers

not only regulated and taxed the manufacture and sale, but they also

prescribed minutely the quality and price of beer, the time when, and

circumstances under which, it could be sold; the duties of the tapster

and the obligations of the drinker. Kieft forbade the tapping of beer

during divine service and after a certain hour at night; and, in

order to remind the burghers and tapsters of the latter inhibition, he

caused the town bell to be rung—an imitation of the old European custom

of announcing the hour for retiring. His object in introducing the

curfew (the Norman _couvre feu_)[2] was probably not confined to these

things; it is quite likely that he intended thus to force upon the

honest Dutch burghers the conviction that a man of strong will had come

to assume the powers and functions which the licentious Van Twiller

had permitted to be disregarded. Doubtless Kieft honestly endeavored

to correct the evils which had grown up under his predecessor’s rule;

but his motives were probably not always of a purely moral character.

In forbidding the retailing of wine and confining its sale to the

Company’s warehouse—“where,” as he stated in his proclamation, “it

could be obtained in moderate quantities and at a fair price”—he

intended no doubt to create for himself a monopoly of this traffic;

and in establishing a distillery on Staten Island, the first in

New Netherland, he very likely sought to enlarge the scope of his

monopoly. Fortunately, brewing had by this time grown too strong as an

independent enterprise to be absorbed by the Company in this singularly

arbitrary manner. It had become a favorite occupation, as a local

historian justly says; and many of the best and most respected citizens

engaged in it.

[2] The old German night-watchman’s hourly song began with the

announcement of the hour of the night and the admonition to guard

fire and light.

[Sidenote: BREWERS REVOLT AGAINST A TAX]

Naturally enough, the rapid growth of brewing suggested to Governor

Kieft the expediency of levying a tax upon beer, and he imposed this

all the more readily because, in consequence of the Indian War which

he had provoked by a “shocking massacre of savages,” the treasury was

totally depleted. In 1644, he levied a tax of three guilders upon

every tun of beer manufactured by a brewer, and of one florin upon

every tun brewed by private citizens for their own use. Aware that

the imposition of this or any other tax without the consent of the

“Eight Men”—a sort of assembly representing the people—would meet with

little favor, he endeavored to propitiate the brewers by permitting

them to sell beer to tapsters at twenty florins per tun, an increase

over the old price almost covering the amount of the tax. The brewers,

nevertheless, stoutly refused to pay the excise, and based their

refusal upon the ground that the tax was imposed against the will of

the representatives of the people and, therefore, contrary to what they

conceived to be an inalienable right of every burgher. While their

opposition to a government without the consent of the governed may

not have been very clearly defined, the stout burghers of the colony

fully understood that taxation without the consent of the taxed was an

absolute wrong.

The best historians accord in the opinion that the attitude of the

brewers, at that stage of the political development of the Colonies,

deserves the utmost praise and reflects all the more credit upon them,

because the inducements held out to them by Kieft in the form of a

permission to increase the price of their product, might have prompted

them to yield, if they had valued their profits more than the political

rights of their fellow citizens. The historian O’Callaghan, in his

History of New Netherland, expresses this view in these words: “Kieft

had no idea of being thwarted by such constitutional scruples. Judgment

was given against the brewers, and thus another victory was achieved in

New Netherland over popular rights.”

In all likelihood, the brewers expected that the protest which the

Eight Men had openly raised against the excise would enable them to

maintain their refusal to pay; but while this expectation may have

had the effect of inspiring them with a degree of temerity which

would otherwise not have been aroused so readily, it detracts not a

particle from the praiseworthiness of their action. At all events,

if they calculated upon any leniency on Kieft’s part, they reckoned

without their host; for that arbitrary ruler not only disregarded the

remonstrances of the Eight Men and insisted upon payment of the tax,

but he even confiscated the whole stock of beer in the cellars of the

recalcitrant brewers and gave it to the soldiers—partly as a prize and

partly, no doubt, as an incentive to effective execution, on their

part, in the event of a popular demonstration. The brewers lost their

beer and their case, but they were lauded and they made a memorable bit

of history as the champions of popular rights.

[Sidenote: MEN OF WORTH AND SUBSTANCE]

We may be permitted to digress a little (though such digression must

necessarily carry us beyond the period of Kieft’s administration)

in order to mention a few of the many Colonial brewers whose names

are familiar to every New Yorker, even to this day. William Beekman,

brewer, was successively schepen, burgomaster of New Amsterdam for

nine years, vice-director of the Colony on the Delaware, sheriff at

Esopus, alderman, and again sheriff under English dominion—holding

office, with some interruption for forty years. He continued the

brewery of George Holmes, built in 1654, and died in 1707 at the age

of 84. Beekman Street is named after him, and also (it is claimed)

William Street. Peter W. Couwenhoven, brewer, was schepen in 1653 and

1654, and again in 1658-59 and 1661-63. Nicholas and Balthazar Bayard,

brewers, held office between 1683 and 1687; former as alderman and

mayor, and the latter as alderman. Petrus Rutger, brewer, was assistant

alderman from 1730 to 1732. The Rutgers were a family of brewers.

Jean Rutgers, their forefather, had a brewery in 1653, built probably

earlier. Alice, daughter of Anthony Rutgers, married Leonard Lispenard,

and one of the latter’s sons (Anthony) owned extensive breweries. The

name of Lispenard, says a local historian, is merged in the families

of Stewart, Webb, Livingstone, Winthrop, etc. John DeForrest, brewer,

was schepen in 1658. Jacob Kip, brewer, was schepen from 1659 to 1665,

and again in 1673. His ancestors, the DeKypes, belonged to the oldest

nobility of the Bretagne.

Oloff S. Van Cortlandt, brewer, was burgomaster from 1653 to 1663

(thirteen years of continuous service), and alderman in 1666, 1667 and

1671. If certain genealogical charts (usually considered reliable)

may be trusted, Van Cortlandt was a descendant of the Dukes of

Courland, Russia. He had a brewery in Stone Street, which in Dutch

days was appropriately named Brouwer, _i.e._, Brewer Street. His

daughter, Maria, married Jeremiah Van Rensselaer—lord of the colony of

Rensselaerwyck who also was founder of a brewery, namely, the one at

Beverwyck, before adverted to. Aert Teunison, a most influential man in

his days, established the first brewery at Hoboken, and made beer for

his neighbors until 1648, when he was killed by the Indians. Michael

Janson, the progenitor of the large Vreeland family, was the first

brewer at Pavonia, in 1654. Jacob Van Vleck, brewer, was alderman in

1684, 1685 and 1686. Martin Cregier, captain of the military company—a

man of considerable importance, who commanded several exploring parties

and subsequently became burgomaster—was the proprietor of a tavern

opposite Bowling Green in 1653, and doubtless also practiced brewing.

We may now close this very incomplete list of prominent Colonial

brewers with the mention of one whose name is, and always has been, of

uncommon interest to historians, seeing that he was the first white

male born in New Netherland. Jean Vigne held the office of schepen

during three terms. He followed the threefold occupation of brewer,

miller and farmer, and owned a tract of land, the site of his brewery,

near Watergate (present Wall Street).

American Beer: Glimpses of Its History and Description of Its Manufacture · 第 2 / 11 章