the quality of his conversation varied. This youth, so hard to please
that of authors who were at the height of their fame he would say: "He's
a gloomy idiot; he's a sheer imbecile," would every now and then tell,
with immense gusto, stories that were simply not funny or would instance
as a "really remarkable person" some man who was completely
insignificant. This double scale of measuring the wit, the worth, the
interest of people continued to puzzle me until I was introduced to M.
Bloch, senior.
I had not supposed that we should ever be allowed to know him, for Bloch
junior had spoken ill of me to Saint-Loup and of Saint-Loup to me. In
particular, he had said to Robert that I was (always) a frightful snob.
"Yes, really, he is overjoyed at knowing M. LLLLegrandin." This trick of
isolating a word, was, in Bloch, a sign at once of irony and of
learning. Saint-Loup, who had never heard the name of Legrandin, was
bewildered. "But who is he?" "Oh, he's a bit of all right, he is!" Bloch
laughed, thrusting his hands into his pockets as though for warmth,
convinced that he was at that moment engaged in contemplation of the
picturesque aspect of an extraordinary country gentleman compared to
whom those of Barbey d'Aurevilly were as nothing. He consoled himself
for his inability to portray M. Legrandin by giving him a string of
capital 'L's, smacking his lips over the name as over a wine from the
farthest bin. But these subjective enjoyments remained hidden from other
people. If he spoke ill of me to Saint-Loup he made up for it by
speaking no less ill of Saint-Loup to me. We had each of us learned
these slanders in detail, the next day, not that we repeated them to
each other, a thing which would have seemed to us very wrong, but to
Bloch appeared so natural and almost inevitable that in his natural
anxiety, in the certainty moreover that he would be telling us only what
each of us was bound sooner or later to know, he preferred to anticipate
the disclosure and, taking Saint-Loup aside, admitted that he had spoken
ill of him, on purpose, so that it might be repeated to him, swore to
him "by Zeus Kronion, binder of oaths" that he loved him dearly, that he
would lay down his life for him; and wiped away a tear. The same day, he
contrived to see me alone, made his confession, declared that he had
acted in my interest, because he felt that a certain kind of social
intercourse was fatal to me and that I was "worthy of better things."
Then, clasping me by the hand, with the sentimentality of a drunkard,
albeit his drunkenness was purely nervous: "Believe me," he said, "and
may the black Ker seize me this instant and bear me across the portals
of Hades, hateful to men, if yesterday, when I thought of you, of
Combray, of my boundless affection for you, of afternoon hours in class
which you do not even remember, I did not lie awake weeping all night
long. Yes, all night long, I swear it, and alas, I know--for I know the
human soul--you will not believe me." I did indeed "not believe" him,
and to his words which, I felt, he was making up on the spur of the
moment, and expanding as he went on, his swearing "by Ker" added no
great weight, the Hellenic cult being in Bloch purely literary. Besides,
whenever he began to grow sentimental and wished his hearer to grow
sentimental over a falsehood, he would say: "I swear it", more for the
hysterical satisfaction of lying than to make people think that he was
speaking the truth. I did not believe what he was saying, but I bore him
no ill-will for that, for I had inherited from my mother and grandmother
their incapacity for resentment even of far worse offenders, and their
habit of never condemning anyone.
Besides, he was not altogether a bad youth, this Bloch; he could be, and
was at times quite charming. And now that the race of Combray, the race
from which sprang creatures absolutely unspoiled like my grandmother and
mother, seems almost extinct, as I have hardly any choice now save
between honest brutes, insensible and loyal, in whom the mere sound of
their voices shews at once that they take absolutely no interest in
one's life--and another kind of men who so long as they are with one
understand one, cherish one, grow sentimental even to tears, take their
revenge a few hours later by making some cruel joke at one's expense,
but return to one, always just as comprehending, as charming, as closely
assimilated, for the moment, to oneself, I think that it is of this
latter sort that I prefer if not the moral worth at any rate the
society.
"You cannot imagine my grief when I think of you," Bloch went on. "When
you come to think of it, it is a rather Jewish side of my nature," he
added ironically, contracting his pupils as though he had to prepare for
the microscope an infinitesimal quantity of "Jewish blood", and as might
(but never would) have said a great French noble who among his
ancestors, all Christian, might nevertheless have included Samuel
Bernard, or further still, the Blessed Virgin from whom, it is said, the
Lévy family claim descent, "coming out. I rather like," he continued
"to find room among my feelings for the share (not that it is more than
a very tiny share) which may be ascribed to my Jewish origin." He made
this statement because it seemed to him at once clever and courageous to
speak the truth about his race, a truth which at the same time he
managed to water down to a remarkable extent, like misers who decide to
pay their debts but have not the courage to pay more than half. This
kind of deceit which consists in having the boldness to proclaim the
truth, but only after mixing with it an ample measure of lies which
falsify it, is commoner than people think, and even among those who do
not habitually practise it certain crises in life, especially those in
which love is at stake, give them an opportunity of taking to it.
All these confidential diatribes by Bloch to Saint-Loup against me and
to me against Saint-Loup ended in an invitation to dinner. I am by no
means sure that he did not first make an attempt to secure Saint-Loup by
himself. It would have been so like Bloch to do so that probably he did;
but if so success did not crown his effort, for it was to myself and
Saint-Loup that Bloch said one day: "Dear master, and you, O horseman
beloved of Ares, de Saint-Loup-en-Bray, tamer of horses, since I have
encountered you by the shore of Amphitrite, resounding with foam, hard
by the tents of the swift-shipped Méniers, will both of you come to
dinner any day this week with my illustrious sire, of blameless heart?"
He proffered this invitation because he desired to attach himself more
closely to Saint-Loup who would, he hoped, secure him the right of entry
into aristocratic circles. Formed by me for myself, this ambition would
have seemed to Bloch the mark of the most hideous snobbishness, quite in
keeping with the opinion that he already held of a whole side of my
nature which he did not regard--or at least had not hitherto
regarded--as its most important side; but the same ambition in himself
seemed to him the proof of a finely developed curiosity in a mind
anxious to carry out certain social explorations from which he might
perhaps glean some literary benefit. M. Bloch senior, when his son had
told him that he was going to bring one of his friends in to dinner, and
had in a sarcastic but satisfied tone enunciated the name and title of
that friend: "The Marquis de Saint-Loup-en-Bray", had been thrown into
great commotion. "The Marquis de Saint-Loup-en-Bray! I'll be jiggered!"
he had exclaimed, using the oath which was with him the strongest
indication of social deference. And he cast at a son capable of having
formed such an acquaintance an admiring glance which seemed to say:
"Really, it is astounding. Can this prodigy be indeed a child of mine?"
which gave my friend as much pleasure as if his monthly allowance had
been increased by fifty francs. For Bloch was not in his element at home
and felt that his father treated him like a lost sheep because of his
lifelong admiration for Leconte de Lisle, Heredia and other "Bohemians".
But to have got to know Saint-Loup-en-Bray, whose father had been
chairman of the Suez Canal board ("I'll be jiggered!") was an
indisputable "score". What a pity, indeed, that they had left in Paris,
for fear of its being broken on the journey, the stereoscope. Alone
among men, M. Bloch senior had the art, or at least the right to exhibit
it. He did this, moreover, on rare occasions only, and then to good
purpose, on evenings when there was a full-dress affair, with hired
waiters. So that from these exhibitions of the stereoscope there
emanated, for those who were present, as it were a special distinction,
a privileged position, and for the master of the house who gave them a
reputation such as talent confers on a man--which could not have been
greater had the photographs been taken by M. Bloch himself and the
machine his own invention. "You weren't invited to Solomon's yesterday?"
one of the family would ask another. "No! I was not one of the elect.
What was on?" "Oh, a great how-d'ye-do, the stereoscope, the whole box
of tricks!" "Indeed! If they had the stereoscope I'm sorry I wasn't
there; they say Solomon is quite amazing when he works it."--"It can't
be helped;" said M. Bloch now to his son, "it's a mistake to let him
have everything at once; that would leave him nothing to look forward
to." He had actually thought, in his paternal affection and in the hope
of touching his son's heart, of sending for the instrument. But there
was not time, or rather they had thought there would not be; for we were
obliged to put off the dinner because Saint-Loup could not leave the
hotel, where he was waiting for an uncle who was coming to spend a few
days with Mme. de Villeparisis. Since--for he was greatly addicted to
physical culture, and especially to long walks--it was largely on foot,
spending the night in wayside farms, that this uncle was to make the
journey from the country house in which he was staying, the precise date
of his arrival at Balbec was by no means certain. And Saint-Loup, afraid
to stir out of doors, even entrusted me with the duty of taking to
Incauville, where the nearest telegraph-office was, the messages that he
sent every day to his mistress. The uncle for whom we were waiting was
called Palamède, a name that had come down to him from his ancestors
the Princes of Sicily. And later on when I found, as I read history,
belonging to this or that Podestà or Prince of the Church, the same
Christian name, a fine renaissance medal--some said, a genuine
antique--that had always remained in the family, having passed from
generation to generation, from the Vatican cabinet to the uncle of my
friend, I felt the pleasure that is reserved for those who, unable from
lack of means to start a case of medals, or a picture gallery, look out
for old names (names of localities, instructive and picturesque as an
old map, a bird's eye view, a sign-board or a return of customs;
baptismal names, in which rings out and is plainly heard, in their fine
French endings, the defect of speech, the intonation of a racial
vulgarity, the vicious pronunciation by which our ancestors made Latin
and Saxon words undergo lasting mutilations which in due course became
the august law-givers of our grammar books) and, in short, by drawing
upon their collections of ancient and sonorous words, give themselves
concerts like the people who acquire viols da gamba and viols d'amour so
as to perform the music of days gone by upon old-fashioned instruments.
Saint-Loup told me that even in the most exclusive aristocratic society
his uncle Palamède had the further distinction of being particularly
difficult to approach, contemptuous, double-dyed in his nobility,
forming with his brother's wife and a few other chosen spirits what was
known as the Phoenix Club. There even his insolence was so much dreaded
that it had happened more than once that people of good position who had
been anxious to meet him and had applied to his own brother for an
introduction had met with a refusal: "Really, you mustn't ask me to
introduce you to my brother Palamède. My wife and I, we would all of us
do our best for you, but it would be no good. Besides, there's always
the danger of his being rude to you, and I shouldn't like that." At the
Jockey Club he had, with a few of his friends, marked a list of two
hundred members whom they would never allow to be introduced to them.
And in the Comte de Paris's circle he was known by the nickname of "The
Prince" because of his distinction and his pride.
Saint-Loup told me about his uncle's early life, now a long time ago.
Every day he used to take women to a bachelor establishment which he
shared with two of his friends, as good-looking as himself, on account
of which they were known as "The Three Graces".
"One day, a man who just now is very much in the eye, as Balzac would
say, of the Faubourg Saint-Germain, but who at a rather awkward period
of his early life displayed odd tastes, asked my uncle to let him come
to this place. But no sooner had he arrived than it was not to the
ladies but to my uncle Palamède that he began to make overtures. My
uncle pretended not to understand, made an excuse to send for his two
friends; they appeared on the scene, seized the offender, stripped him,
thrashed him till he bled, and then with twenty degrees of frost outside
kicked him into the street where he was found more dead than alive; so
much so that the police started an inquiry which the poor devil had the
greatest difficulty in getting them to abandon. My uncle would never go
in for such drastic methods now, in fact you can't conceive the number
of men of humble position that he, who is so haughty with people in
society, has shewn his affection, taken under his wing, even if he is
paid for it with ingratitude. It may be a servant who has looked after
him in a hotel, for whom he will find a place in Paris, or a
farm-labourer whom he will pay to have taught a trade. That is really
the rather nice side of his character, in contrast to his social side."
Saint-Loup indeed belonged to that type of young men of fashion,
situated at an altitude at which it has been possible to cultivate such
expressions as: "What is really rather nice about him", "His rather nice
side", precious seeds which produce very rapidly a way of looking at
things in which one counts oneself as nothing and the "people" as
everything; the exact opposite, in a word, of plebeian pride. "It seems,
it is quite impossible to imagine how he set the tone, how he laid down
the law for the whole of society when he was a young man. He acted
entirely for himself; in any circumstances he did what seemed pleasing
to himself, what was most convenient, but at once the snobs would start
copying him. If he felt thirsty at the play, and sent out from his box
for a drink, the little sitting-rooms behind all the boxes would be
filled, a week later, with refreshments. One wet summer, when he had a
touch of rheumatism, he ordered an ulster of a loose but warm vicuna
wool, which is used only for travelling rugs, and kept the blue and
orange stripes shewing. The big tailors at once received orders from all
their customers for blue and orange ulsters of rough wool. If he had
some reason for wishing to keep every trace of ceremony out of a dinner
in a country house where he was spending the day, and to point the
distinction had come without evening clothes and sat down to table in
the suit he had been wearing that afternoon, it became the fashion, when
you were dining in the country, not to dress. If he was eating some
special sweet and instead of taking his spoon used a knife, or a special
implement of his own invention which he had had made for him by a
silversmith, or his fingers, it at once became wrong to eat it in any
other way. He wanted once to hear some Beethoven quartets again (for
with all his preposterous ideas he is no fool, mind, he has great gifts)
and arranged for some musicians to come and play them to him and a few
friends once a week. The ultra-fashionable thing that season was to give
quite small parties, with chamber music. I should say he's not done at
all badly out of life. With his looks, he must have had any number of
women! I can't tell you exactly whom, for he is very discreet. But I do
know that he was thoroughly unfaithful to my poor aunt. Not that that
prevented his being always perfectly charming to her, and her adoring
him; he was in mourning for her for years. When he is in Paris, he still
goes to the cemetery nearly every day."
The morning after Robert had told me all these things about his uncle,
while he waited for him (and waited, as it happened, in vain), as I was
coming by myself past the Casino on my way back to the hotel, I had the
sensation of being watched by somebody who was not far off. I turned my
head and saw a man of about forty, very tall and rather stout, with a
very dark moustache, who, nervously slapping the leg of his trousers
with a switch, kept fastened upon me a pair of eyes dilated with
observation. Every now and then those eyes were shot through by a look
of intense activity such as the sight of a person whom they do not know
excites only in men to whom, for whatever reason, it suggests thoughts
that would not occur to anyone else--madmen, for instance, or spies. He
trained upon me a supreme stare at once bold, prudent, rapid and
profound, like a last shot which one fires at an enemy at the moment
when one turns to flee, and, after first looking all round him, suddenly
adopting an absent and lofty air, by an abrupt revolution of his whole
body turned to examine a playbill on the wall in the reading of which he
became absorbed, while he hummed a tune and fingered the moss-rose in
his buttonhole. He drew from his pocket a note-book in which he appeared
to be taking down the title of the performance that was announced,
looked two or three times at his watch, pulled down over his eyes a
black straw hat the brim of which he extended with his hand held out
over it like a visor, as though to see whether some one were at last
coming, made the perfunctory gesture of annoyance by which people mean
to shew that they have waited long enough, although they never make it
when they are really waiting, then pushing back his hat and exposing a
scalp cropped close except at the sides where he allowed a pair of waved
"pigeon's-wings" to grow quite long, he emitted the loud panting breath
that people give who are not feeling too hot but would like it to be
thought that they were. He gave me the impression of a "hotel crook" who
had been watching my grandmother and myself for some days, and while he
was planning to rob us had just discovered that I had surprised him in
the act of spying; to put me off the scent, perhaps he was seeking only,
by his new attitude, to express boredom and detachment, but it was with
an exaggeration so aggressive that his object appeared to be--at least
as much as the dissipating of the suspicions that I must have had of
him--to avenge a humiliation which quite unconsciously I must have
inflicted on him, to give me the idea not so much that he had not seen
me as that I was an object of too little importance to attract his
attention. He threw back his shoulders with an air of bravado, bit his
lips, pushed up his moustache, and in the lens of his eyes made an
adjustment of something that was indifferent, harsh, almost insulting.
So effectively that the singularity of his expression made me take him
at one moment for a thief and at another for a lunatic. And yet his
scrupulously ordered attire was far more sober and far more simple than
that of any of the summer visitors I saw at Balbec, and gave a
reassurance to my own suit, so often humiliated by the dazzling and
common-place whiteness of their holiday garb. But my grandmother was
coming towards me, we took a turn together, and I was waiting for her,
an hour later, outside the hotel into which she had gone for a moment,
when I saw emerge from it Mme. de Villeparisis with Robert de Saint-Loup
and the stranger who had stared at me so intently outside the Casino.
Swift as a lightning-flash his look shot through me, just as at the
moment when I first noticed him, and returned, as though he had not seen
me, to hover, slightly lowered, before his eyes, dulled, like the
neutral look which feigns to see nothing without and is incapable of
reporting anything to the mind within, the look which expresses merely
the satisfaction of feeling round it the eyelids which it cleaves apart
with its sanctimonious roundness, the devout, the steeped look that we
see on the faces of certain hypocrites, the smug look on those of
certain fools. I saw that he had changed his clothes. The suit he was
wearing was darker even than the other; and no doubt this was because
the true distinction in dress lies nearer to simplicity than the false;
but there was something more; when one came near him one felt that if
colour was almost entirely absent from these garments it was not because
he who had banished it from them was indifferent to it but rather
because for some reason he forbade himself the enjoyment of it. And the
sobriety which they displayed seemed to be of the kind that comes from
obedience to a rule of diet rather than from want of appetite. A dark
green thread harmonised, in the stuff of his trousers, with the clock on
his socks, with a refinement which betrayed the vivacity of a taste that
was everywhere else conquered, to which this single concession had been
made out of tolerance for such a weakness, while a spot of red on his
necktie was imperceptible, like a liberty which one dares not take.
"How are you? Let me introduce my nephew, the Baron de Guermantes," Mme.
de Villeparisis greeted me, while the stranger without looking at me,
muttering a vague "Charmed!" which he followed with a "H'm, h'm, h'm" to
give his affability an air of having been forced, and doubling back his
little finger, forefinger and thumb, held out to me his middle and ring
fingers, the latter bare of any ring, which I clasped through his suede
glove; then, without lifting his eyes to my face, he turned towards Mme.
de Villeparisis.
"Good gracious; I shall be forgetting my own name next!" she exclaimed.
"Here am I calling you Baron de Guermantes. Let me introduce the Baron
de Charlus. After all, it's not a very serious mistake," she went on,
"for you're a thorough Guermantes whatever else you are."
By this time my grandmother had reappeared, and we all set out together.
Saint-Loup's uncle declined to honour me not only with a word, with so
much as a look, even, in my direction. If he stared strangers out of
countenance (and during this short excursion he two or three times
hurled his terrible and searching scrutiny like a sounding lead at
insignificant people of obviously humble extraction who happened to
pass), to make up for that he never for a moment, if I was to judge by
myself, looked at the people whom he did know, just as a detective on
special duty might except his personal friends from his professional
vigilance. Leaving them, my grandmother, Mme. de Villeparisis and him to
talk to one another, I fell behind with Saint-Loup.
"Tell me, am I right in thinking I heard Mme. de Villeparisis say just
now to your uncle that he was a Guermantes?"
"Of course he is; Palamède de Guermantes."
"Not the same Guermantes who have a place near Combray, and claim
descent from Geneviève de Brabant?"
"Most certainly: my uncle, who is the very last word in heraldry and all
that sort of thing, would tell you that our 'cry', our war-cry, that is
to say, which was changed afterwards to 'Passavant' was originally
'Combraysis'," he said, smiling so as not to appear to be priding
himself on this prerogative of a "cry", which only the semi-royal
houses, the great chiefs of feudal bands enjoyed. "It's his brother who
has the place now."
And so she was indeed related, and quite closely, to the Guermantes,
this Mme. de Villeparisis who had so long been for me the lady who had
given me a duck filled with chocolates, when I was little, more remote
then from the Guermantes way than if she had been shut up somewhere on
the Méséglise, less brilliant, less highly placed by me than was the
Combray optician, and who now suddenly went through one of those
fantastic rises in value, parallel to the depreciations, no less
unforeseen, of other objects in our possession, which--rise and fall
alike--introduce in our youth and in those periods of our life in which
a trace of youth persists changes as numerous as the Metamorphoses of
Ovid.
"Haven't they got, down there, the busts of all the old lords of
Guermantes?"
"Yes; and a lovely sight they are!" Saint-Loup was ironical. "Between
you and me, I look on all that sort of thing as rather a joke. But they
have got at Guermantes, what is a little more interesting, and that is
quite a touching portrait of my aunt by Carrière. It's as fine as
Whistler or Velasquez," went on Saint-Loup, who in his neophyte zeal was
not always very exact about degrees of greatness. "There are also some
moving pictures by Gustave Moreau. My aunt is the niece of your friend
Mme. de Villeparisis; she was brought up by her, and married her cousin,
who was a nephew, too, of my aunt Villeparisis, the present Duc de
Guermantes."
"Then who is this uncle?"
"He bears the title of Baron de Charlus. Properly speaking, when my
great-uncle died, my uncle Palamède ought to have taken the title of
Prince des Laumes, which his brother used before he became Duc de
Guermantes, for in that family they change their names as you'ld change
your shirt. But my uncle has peculiar ideas about all that sort of
thing. And as he feels that people are rather apt to overdo the Italian
Prince and Grandee of Spain business nowadays, though he had
half-a-dozen titles of 'Prince' to choose from, he has remained Baron de
Charlus, as a protest, and with an apparent simplicity which really
covers a good deal of pride. 'In these days', he says, 'everybody is
Prince something-or-other; one really must have a title that will
distinguish one; I shall call myself Prince when I wish to travel
incognito.' According to him there is no older title than the Charlus
barony; to prove to you that it is earlier than the Montmorency title,
though they used to claim, quite wrongly, to be the premier barons of
France when they were only premier in the Ile-de-France, where their
fief was, my uncle will explain to you for hours on end and enjoy doing
it, because, although he's a most intelligent man, really gifted, he
regards that sort of thing as quite a live topic of conversation,"
Saint-Loup smiled again. "But as I am not like him, you mustn't ask me
to talk pedigrees; I know nothing more deadly, more perishing; really,
life is not long enough."
I now recognised in the hard look which had made me turn round that
morning outside the Casino the same that I had seen fixed on me at
Tansonville, at the moment when Mme. Swann called Gilberte away.
"But, I say, all those mistresses that, you told me, your uncle M. de
Charlus had had, wasn't Mme. Swann one of them?"
"Good lord, no! That is to say, my uncle's a great friend of Swann, and
has always stood up for him. But no one has ever suggested that he was
his wife's lover. You would make a great sensation in Paris society if
people thought you believed that."
I dared not reply that it would have caused an even greater sensation in
Combray society if people had thought that I did not believe it.
My grandmother was delighted with M. de Charlus. No doubt he attached an
extreme importance to all questions of birth and social position, and my
grandmother had remarked this, but without any trace of that severity
which as a rule embodies a secret envy and the annoyance of seeing some
one else enjoy an advantage which one would like but cannot oneself
possess. As on the other hand my grandmother, content with her lot and
never for a moment regretting that she did not move in a more brilliant
sphere, employed only her intellect in observing the eccentricities of
M. de Charlus, she spoke of Saint-Loup's uncle with that detached,
smiling, almost affectionate kindness with which we reward the object of
our disinterested study for the pleasure that it has given us, all the
more that this time the object was a person with regard to whom she
found that his if not legitimate, at any rate picturesque pretensions
shewed him in vivid contrast to the people whom she generally had
occasion to see. But it was especially in consideration of his
intelligence and sensibility, qualities which it was easy to see that M.
de Charlus, unlike so many of the people in society whom Saint-Loup
derided, possessed in a marked degree, that my grandmother had so
readily forgiven him his aristocratic prejudice. And yet this had not
been sacrificed by the uncle, as it was by the nephew, to higher
qualities. Rather, M. de Charlus had reconciled it with them.
Possessing, by virtue of his descent from the Ducs de Nemours and
Princes de Lamballe, documents, furniture, tapestries, portraits painted
for his ancestors by Raphael, Velasquez, Boucher, justified in saying
that he was visiting a museum and a matchless library when he was merely
turning over his family relics at home, he placed in the rank from which
his nephew had degraded it the whole heritage of the aristocracy.
Perhaps also, being less metaphysical than Saint-Loup, less satisfied
with words, more of a realist in his study of men, he did not care to
neglect a factor that was essential to his prestige in their eyes and,
if it gave certain disinterested pleasures to his imagination, could
often be a powerfully effective aid to his utilitarian activities. No
agreement can ever be reached between men of his sort and those who obey
the ideal within them which urges them to strip themselves bare of such
advantages so that they may seek only to realise that ideal, similar in
that respect to the painters, the writers who renounce their virtuosity,
the artistic peoples who modernise themselves, warrior peoples who take
the initiative in a move for universal disarmament, absolute governments
which turn democratic and repeal their harsh laws, though as often as
not the sequel fails to reward their noble effort; for the men lose
their talent, the nations their secular predominance; "pacificism" often
multiplies wars and indulgence criminality. If Saint-Loup's efforts
towards sincerity and emancipation were only to be commended as most
noble, to judge by their visible result, one could still be thankful
that they had failed to bear fruit in M. de Charlus, who had transferred
to his own home much of the admirable panelling from the Guermantes
house, instead of substituting, like his nephew, a "modern style" of
decoration, employing Lebourg or Guillaumin. It was none the less true
that M. de Charlus's ideal was highly artificial, and, if the epithet
can be applied to the word ideal, as much social as artistic. In certain
women of great beauty and rare culture whose ancestresses, two centuries
earlier, had shared in all the glory and grace of the old order, he
found a distinction which made him take pleasure only in their society,
and no doubt the admiration for them which he had protested was sincere,
but countless reminiscences, historical and artistic, called forth by
their names, entered into and formed a great part of it, just as
suggestions of classical antiquity are one of the reasons for the
pleasure which a booklover finds in reading an Ode of Horace that is
perhaps inferior to poems of our own day which would leave the same
booklover cold. Any of these women by the side of a pretty commoner was
for him what are, hanging beside a contemporary canvas representing a
procession or a wedding, those old pictures the history of which we
know, from the Pope or King who ordered them, through the hands of
people whose acquisition of them, by gift, purchase, conquest or
inheritance, recalls to us some event or at least some alliance of
historic interest, and consequently some knowledge that we ourselves
have acquired, gives it a fresh utility, increases our sense of the
richness of the possessions of our memory or of our erudition. M. de
Charlus might be thankful that a prejudice similar to his own, by
preventing these several great ladies from mixing with women whose blood
was less pure, presented them for his veneration unspoiled, in their
unaltered nobility, like an eighteenth-century house-front supported on
its flat column of pink marbles, in which the passage of time has
wrought no change.
M. de Charlus praised the true "nobility" of mind and heart which
characterised these women, playing upon the word in a double sense by
which he himself was taken in, and in which lay the falsehood of this
bastard conception, of this medley of aristocracy, generosity and art,
but also its seductiveness, dangerous to people like my grandmother, to
whom the less refined but more innocent prejudice of a nobleman who
cared only about quarterings and took no thought for anything besides
would have appeared too silly for words, whereas she was defenceless as
soon as a thing presented itself under the externals of a mental
superiority, so much so, indeed, that she regarded Princes as enviable
above all other men because they were able to have a Labruyère, a
Fénelon as their tutors. Outside the Grand Hotel the three Guermantes
left us; they were going to luncheon with the Princesse de Luxembourg.
While my grandmother was saying good-bye to Mme. de Villeparisis and
Saint-Loup to my grandmother, M. de Charlus who, so far, had not uttered
a word to me, drew back a little way from the group and, when he reached
my side, said: "I shall be taking tea this evening after dinner in my
aunt Villeparisis's room; I hope that you will give me the pleasure of
seeing you there, and your grandmother." With which he rejoined the
Marquise.
Although it was Sunday there were no more carriages waiting outside the
hotel now than at the beginning of the season. The solicitor's wife, in
particular, had decided that it was not worth the expense of hiring one
every time simply because she was not going to the Cambremers', and
contented herself with staying in her room.
"Is Mme. Blandais not well?" her husband was asked. "We haven't seen her
all day."
"She has a slight headache; it's the heat, there's thunder coming. The
least thing upsets her; but I expect you will see her this evening; I've
told her she ought to come down. It can't do her any harm."
I had supposed that in thus inviting us to take tea with his aunt, whom
I never doubted that he would have warned that we were coming, M. de
Charlus wished to make amends for the impoliteness which he had shewn me
during our walk that morning. But when, on our entering Mme. de
Villeparisis's room, I attempted to greet her nephew, even although I
walked right round him, while in shrill accents he was telling a
somewhat spiteful story about one of his relatives, I did not succeed in
catching his eye; I decided to say "Good evening" to him, and fairly
loud, to warn him of my presence; but I realised that he had observed
it, for before ever a word had passed my lips, just as I began to bow to
him, I saw his two fingers stretched out for me to shake without his
having turned to look at me or paused in his story. He had evidently
seen me, without letting it appear that he had, and I noticed then that
his eyes, which were never fixed on the person to whom he was speaking,
strayed perpetually in all directions, like those of certain animals
when they are frightened, or those of street hawkers who, while they are
bawling their patter and displaying their illicit merchandise, keep a
sharp lookout, though without turning their heads, on the different
points of the horizon, from any of which may appear, suddenly, the
police. At the same time I was a little surprised to find that Mme. de
Villeparisis, while glad to see us, did not seem to have been expecting
us, and I was still more surprised to hear M. de Charlus say to my
grandmother: "Ah! that was a capital idea of yours to come and pay us a
visit; charming of them, is it not, my dear aunt?" No doubt he had
noticed his aunt's surprise at our entry and thought, as a man
accustomed to set the tone, to strike the right note, that it would be
enough to transform that surprise into joy were he to shew that he
himself felt it, that it was indeed the feeling which our arrival there
ought to have prompted. In which he calculated wisely; for Mme. de
Villeparisis, who had a high opinion of her nephew and knew how
difficult it was to please him, appeared suddenly to have found new
attractions in my grandmother and continued to make much of her. But I
failed to understand how M. de Charlus could, in the space of a few
hours, have forgotten the invitation--so curt but apparently so
intentional, so premeditated--which he had addressed to me that same
morning, or why he called a "capital idea" on my grandmother's part an
idea that had been entirely his own. With a scruple of accuracy which I
retained until I had reached the age at which I realised that it is not
by asking him questions that one learns the truth of what another man
has had in his mind, and that the risk of a misunderstanding which will
probably pass unobserved is less than that which may come from a
purblind insistence: "But, sir," I reminded him, "you remember, surely,
that it was you who asked me if we would come in this evening?" Not a
sound, not a movement betrayed that M. de Charlus had so much as heard
my question. Seeing which I repeated it, like a diplomat, or like young
men after a misunderstanding who endeavour, with untiring and unrewarded
zeal, to obtain an explanation which their adversary is determined not
to give them. Still M. de Charlus answered me not a word. I seemed to
see hovering upon his lips the smile of those who from a great height
pass judgment on the characters and breeding of their inferiors.
Since he refused to give any explanation, I tried to provide one for
myself, but succeeded only in hesitating between several, none of which
could be the right one. Perhaps he did not remember, or perhaps it was I
who had failed to understand what he had said to me that morning. . . .
More probably, in his pride, he did not wish to appear to have sought to
attract people whom he despised, and preferred to cast upon them the
responsibility for their intrusion. But then, if he despised us, why had
he been so anxious that we should come, or rather that my grandmother
should come, for of the two of us it was to her alone that he spoke that
evening, and never once to me. Talking with the utmost animation to her,
as also to Mme. de Villeparisis, hiding, so to speak, behind them, as
though he were seated at the back of a theatre-box, he contented
himself, turning from them every now and then the exploring gaze of his
penetrating eyes, with fastening it on my face, with the same gravity,
the same air of preoccupation as if my face had been a manuscript
difficult to decipher.
No doubt, if he had not had those eyes, the face of M. de Charlus would
have been similar to the faces of many good-looking men. And when
Saint-Loup, speaking to me of various other Guermantes, on a later
occasion, said: "Gad, they've not got that thoroughbred air, of being
gentlemen to their finger-tips, that uncle Palamède has!" confirming my
suspicion that a thoroughbred air and aristocratic distinction were not
anything mysterious and new but consisted in elements which I had
recognised without difficulty and without receiving any particular
impression from them, I was to feel that another of my illusions had
been shattered. But that face, to which a faint layer of powder gave
almost the appearance of a face on the stage, in vain might M. de
Charlus hermetically seal its expression; his eyes were like two
crevices, two loopholes which alone he had failed to stop, and through
which, according to where one stood or sat in relation to him, one felt
suddenly flash across one the glow of some internal engine which seemed
to offer no reassurance even to him who without being altogether master
of it must carry it inside him, at an unstable equilibrium and always on
the point of explosion; and the circumspect and unceasingly restless
expression of those eyes, with all the signs of exhaustion which,
extending from them to a pair of dark rings quite low down upon his
cheeks, were stamped on his face, however carefully he might compose and
regulate it, made one think of some incognito, some disguise assumed by
a powerful man in danger, or merely by a dangerous--but tragic--person.
I should have liked to divine what was this secret which other men did
not carry in their breasts and which had already made M. de Charlus's
gaze so enigmatic to me when I had seen him that morning outside the
Casino. But with what I now knew of his family I could no longer believe
that they were the eyes of a thief, nor, after what I had heard of his
conversation, could I say that they were those of a madman. If he was
cold with me, while making himself agreeable to my grandmother, that
arose perhaps not from a personal antipathy for, generally speaking,
just as he was kindly disposed towards women, of whose faults he used to
speak without, as a rule, any narrowing of the broadest tolerance, so he
shewed with regard to men, and especially young men, a hatred so violent
as to suggest that of certain extreme misogynists for women. Two or
three "carpet-knights", relatives or intimate friends of Saint-Loup who
happened to mention their names, M. de Charlus, with an almost ferocious
expression, in sharp contrast to his usual coldness, called: "Little
cads!" I gathered that the particular fault which he found in the young
men of the period was their extreme effeminacy. "They're absolute
women," he said with scorn. But what life would not have appeared
effeminate beside that which he expected a man to lead, and never found
energetic or virile enough? (He himself, when he walked across country,
after long hours on the road would plunge his heated body into frozen
streams.) He would not even allow a man to wear a single ring. But this
profession of virility did not prevent his having also the most delicate
sensibilities. When Mme. de Villeparisis asked him to describe to my
grandmother some country house in which Mme. de Sévigné had stayed,
adding that she could not help feeling that there was something rather
"literary" about that lady's distress at being parted from "that
tiresome Mme. de Grignan":
"On the contrary," he retorted, "I can think of nothing more true.
Besides, it was a time in which feelings of that sort were thoroughly
understood. The inhabitant of Lafontaine's Monomotapa, running to see
his friend who had appeared to him in a dream, and had looked sad, the
pigeon finding that the greatest of evils is the absence of the other
pigeon, seem to you perhaps, my dear aunt, as exaggerated as Mme. de
Sévigné's impatience for the moment when she will be alone with her
daughter. It is so fine what she says when she leaves her: 'This parting
gives a pain to my soul which I feel like an ache in my body. In absence
one is liberal with the hours. One anticipates a time for which one is
longing.'" My grandmother was in ecstasies at hearing the Letters thus
spoken of, exactly as she would have spoken of them herself. She was
astonished that a man could understand them so thoroughly. She found in
M. de Charlus a delicacy, a sensibility that were quite feminine. We
said to each other afterwards, when we were by ourselves and began to
discuss him together, that he must have come under the strong influence
of a woman, his mother, or in later life his daughter if he had any
children. "A mistress, perhaps," I thought to myself, remembering the
influence that Saint-Loup's seemed to have had over him, which enabled
me to realise the point to which men can be refined by the women with
whom they live.
"Once she was with her daughter, she had probably nothing to say to
her," put in Mme. de Villeparisis.
"Most certainly she had: if it was only what she calls 'things so slight
that nobody else would notice them but you and me.' And anyhow she was
with her. And Labruyère tells us that that is everything. 'To be with
the people one loves, to speak to them, not to speak to them, it is all
the same.' He is right; that is the only form of happiness," added M. de
Charlus in a mournful voice, "and that happiness--alas, life is so ill
arranged that one very rarely tastes it; Mme. de Sévigné was after all
less to be pitied than most of us. She spent a great part of her life
with the person whom she loved."
"You forget that it was not 'love' in her case; the person was her
daughter."
"But what matters in life is not whom or what one loves," he went on, in
a judicial, peremptory, almost a cutting tone; "it is the fact of
loving. What Mme. de Sévigné felt for her daughter has a far better
claim to rank with the passion that Racine described in _Andromaque_ or
_Phèdre_ than the common-place relations young Sévigné had with his
mistresses. It's the same with a mystic's love for his God. The hard and
fast lines with which we circumscribe love arise solely from our
complete ignorance of life."
"You think all that of _Andromaque_ and _Phèdre_, do you?" Saint-Loup
asked his uncle in a faintly contemptuous tone. "There is more truth in
a single tragedy of Racine than in all the dramatic works of Monsieur
Victor Hugo," replied M. de Charlus. "People really are overwhelming,"
Saint-Loup murmured in my ear. "Preferring Racine to Victor, you may say
what you like, it's epoch-making!" He was genuinely distressed by his
uncle's words, but the satisfaction of saying "you may say what you
like" and, better still, "epoch-making" consoled him.
In these reflexions upon the sadness of having to live apart from the
person whom one loves (which were to lead my grandmother to say to me
that Mme. de Villeparisis's nephew understood certain things quite as
well as his aunt, but in a different way, and moreover had something
about him that set him far above the average club man) M. de Charlus not
only allowed a refinement of feeling to appear such as men rarely shew;
his voice itself, like certain contralto voices which have not been
properly trained to the right pitch, so that when they sing it sounds
like a duet between a young man and a woman, singing alternately,
mounted, when he expressed these delicate sentiments, to its higher
notes, took on an unexpected sweetness and seemed to be embodying choirs
of betrothed maidens, of sisters, who poured out the treasures of their
love. But the bevy of young girls, whom M. de Charlus in his horror of
every kind of effeminacy would have been so distressed to learn that he
gave the impression of sheltering thus within his voice, did not confine
themselves to the interpretation, the modulation of scraps of sentiment.
Often while M. de Charlus was talking one could hear their laughter,
shrill, fresh laughter of school-girls or coquettes quizzing their
partners with all the archness of clever tongues and pretty wits.
He told us how a house that had belonged to his family, in which Marie
Antoinette had slept, with a park laid out by Lenôtre, was now in the
hands of the Israels, the wealthy financiers, who had bought it.
"Israel--at least that is the name these people go by, which seems to me
a generic, a racial term rather than a proper name. One cannot tell;
possibly people of that sort do not have names, and are designated only
by the collective title of the tribe to which they belong. It is of no
importance! But fancy, after being a home of the Guermantes, to belong
to Israels!!!" His voice rose. "It reminds me of a room in the Chateau
of Blois where the caretaker who was shewing me over said: 'This is
where Mary Stuart used to say her prayers; I use it to keep my brooms
in.' Naturally I wish to know nothing more of this house that has let
itself be dishonoured, any more than of my cousin Clara de Chimay after
she left her husband. But I keep a photograph of the house, when it was
still unspoiled, just as I keep one of the Princess before her large
eyes had learned to gaze on anyone but my cousin. A photograph acquires
something of the dignity which it ordinarily lacks when it ceases to be
a reproduction of reality and shews us things that no longer exist. I
could give you a copy, since you are interested in that style of
architecture," he said to my grandmother. At that moment, noticing that
the embroidered handkerchief which he had in his pocket was shewing some
coloured threads, he thrust it sharply down out of sight with the
scandalised air of a prudish but far from innocent lady concealing
attractions which, by an excess of scrupulosity, she regards as
indecent. "Would you believe," he went on, "that the first thing the
creatures did was to destroy Lenôtre's park, which is as bad as
slashing a picture by Poussin? For that alone, these Israels ought to be
in prison. It is true," he added with a smile, after a moment's silence,
"that there are probably plenty of other reasons why they should be
there! In any case, you can imagine the effect, with that architecture
behind it, of an English garden."
"But the house is in the same style as the Petit Trianon," said Mme. de
Villeparisis, "and Marie Antoinette had an English garden laid out
there."
"Which, all the same, ruins Gabriel's front;" replied M. de Charlus.
"Obviously, it would be an act of vandalism now to destroy the Hameau.
But whatever may be the spirit of the age, I doubt, all the same,
whether, in that respect, a whim of Mme. Israel has the same importance
as the memory of the Queen."
Meanwhile my grandmother had been making signs to me to go up to bed, in
spite of the urgent appeals of Saint-Loup who, to my utter confusion,
had alluded in front of M. de Charlus to the depression that used often
to come upon me at night before I went to sleep, which his uncle must
regard as betokening a sad want of virility. I lingered a few moments
still, then went upstairs, and was greatly surprised when, a little
later, having heard a knock at my bedroom door and asked who was there,
I heard the voice of M. de Charlus saying dryly:
"It is Charlus. May I come in, sir? Sir," he began again in the same
tone as soon as he had shut the door, "my nephew was saying just now
that you were apt to be worried at night before going to sleep, and also
that you were an admirer of Bergotte's books. As I had one here in my
luggage which you probably do not know, I have brought it to help you to
while away these moments in which you are not comfortable."
I thanked M. de Charlus with some warmth and told him that, on the
contrary, I had been afraid that what Saint-Loup had said to him about
my discomfort when night came would have made me appear in his eyes more
stupid even than I was.
"No; why?" he answered, in a gentler voice. "You have not, perhaps, any
personal merit; so few of us have! But for a time at least you have
youth, and that is always a charm. Besides, sir, the greatest folly of
all is to laugh at or to condemn in others what one does not happen
oneself to feel. I love the night, and you tell me that you are afraid
of it. I love the scent of roses, and I have a friend whom it throws
into a fever. Do you suppose that I think, for that reason, that he is
inferior to me? I try to understand everything and I take care to
condemn nothing. After all, you must not be too sorry for yourself; I do
not say that these moods of depression are not painful, I know that one
can be made to suffer by things which the world would not understand.
But at least you have placed your affection wisely, in your grandmother.
You see a great deal of her. And besides, that is a legitimate
affection, I mean one that is repaid. There are so many of which one
cannot say that."
He began walking up and down the room, looking at one thing, taking up
another. I had the impression that he had something to tell me, and
could not find the right words to express it.
"I have another volume of Bergotte here; I will fetch it for you," he
went on, and rang the bell. Presently a page came. "Go and find me your
head waiter. He is the only person here who is capable of obeying an
order intelligently," said M. de Charlus stiffly. "Monsieur Aimé, sir?"
asked the page. "I cannot tell you his name; yes, I remember now, I did
hear him called Aimé. Run along, I am in a hurry." "He won't be a
minute, sir, I saw him downstairs just now," said the page, anxious to
appear efficient. There was an interval of silence. The page returned.
"Sir, M. Aimé has gone to bed. But I can take your message." "No, you
have only to get him out of bed." "But I can't do that, sir; he doesn't
sleep here." "Then you can leave us alone." "But, sir," I said when the
page had gone, "you are too kind; one volume of Bergotte will be quite
enough." "That is just what I was thinking." M. de Charlus walked up and
down the room. Several minutes passed in this way, then after a
prolonged hesitation, and several false starts, he swung sharply round
and, his voice once more stinging, flung at me: "Good night, sir!" and
left the room. After all the lofty sentiments which I had heard him
express that evening, next day, which was the day of his departure, on
the beach, before noon, when I was on my way down to bathe, and M. de
Charlus had come across to tell me that my grandmother was waiting for
me to join her as soon as I left the water, I was greatly surprised to
hear him say, pinching my neck as he spoke, with a familiarity and a
laugh that were frankly vulgar:
"But he doesn't give a damn for his old grandmother, does he, eh? Little
rascal!"
"What, sir! I adore her!"
"Sir," he said, stepping back a pace, and with a glacial air, "you are
still young; you should profit by your youth to learn two things; first,
to refrain from expressing sentiments that are too natural not to be
taken for granted; and secondly not to dash into speech to reply to
things that are said to you before you have penetrated their meaning. If
you had taken this precaution a moment ago you would have saved yourself
the appearance of speaking at cross-purposes like a deaf man, thereby
adding a second absurdity to that of having anchors embroidered on your
bathing-dress. I have lent you a book by Bergotte which I require. See
that it is brought to me within the next hour by that head waiter with
the silly and inappropriate name, who, I suppose, is not in bed at this
time of day. You make me see that I was premature in speaking to you
last night of the charms of youth; I should have done you a better
service had I pointed out to you its thoughtlessness, its inconsequence,
and its want of comprehension. I hope, sir, that this little douche will
be no less salutary to you than your bathe. But don't let me keep you
standing: you may catch cold. Good day, sir."
No doubt he was sorry afterwards for this speech, for some time later I
received--in a morocco binding on the front of which was inlaid a panel
of tooled leather representing in demi-relief a spray of
forget-me-not--the book which he had lent me, and I had sent back to
him, not by Aimé who was apparently "off duty", but by the lift-boy.
M. de Charlus having gone, Robert and I were free at last to dine with
Bloch. And I realised during this little party that the stories too
readily admitted by our friend as funny were favourite stories of M.
Bloch senior, and that the son's "really remarkable person" was always
one of his father's friends whom he had so classified. There are a
certain number of people whom we admire in our boyhood, a father with
better brains than the rest of the family, a teacher who acquires credit
in our eyes from the philosophy he reveals to us, a schoolfellow more
advanced than we are (which was what Bloch had been to me), who despises
the Musset of the _Espoir en Dieu_ when we still admire it, and when we
have reached Leconte or Claudel will be in ecstasies only over:
A Saint-Biaise, à la Zuecca
Vous étiez, vous étiez bien aise:
with which he will include:
Padoue est un fort bel endroit
Où de très grands docteurs en droit. . . .
Mais j'aime mieux la polenta. . . .
Passe dans mon domino noir
La Toppatelle
and of all the _Nuits_ will remember only:
Au Havre, devant l'Atlantique
A Venise, à l'affreux Lido.
Où vient sur l'herbe d'un tombeau
Mourir la pâle Adriatique.
So, whenever we confidently admire anyone, we collect from him, we quote
with admiration sayings vastly inferior to the sort which, left to our
own judgment, we would sternly reject, just as the writer of a novel
puts into it, on the pretext that they are true, things which people
have actually said, which in the living context are like a dead weight,
form the dull part of the work. Saint-Simon's portraits composed by
himself (and very likely without his admiring them himself) are
admirable, whereas what he cites as the charming wit of his clever
friends is frankly dull where it has not become meaningless. He would
have scorned to invent what he reports as so pointed or so coloured when
said by Mme. Cornuel or Louis XIV, a point which is to be remarked also
in many other writers, and is capable of various interpretations, of
which it is enough to note but one for the present: namely, that in the
state of mind in which we "observe" we are a long way below the level to
which we rise when we create.
There was, then, embedded in my friend Bloch a father Bloch who lagged
forty years behind his son, told impossible stories and laughed as
loudly at them from the heart of my friend as did the separate, visible
and authentic father Bloch, since to the laugh which the latter emitted,
not without several times repeating the last word so that his public
might taste the full flavour of the story, was added the braying laugh
with which the son never failed, at table, to greet his father's
anecdotes. Thus it came about that after saying the most intelligent
things young Bloch, to indicate the portion that he had inherited from
his family, would tell us for the thirtieth time some of the gems which
father Bloch brought out only (with his swallow-tail coat) on the solemn
occasions on which young Bloch brought someone to the house on whom it
was worth while making an impression; one of his masters, a "chum" who
had taken all the prizes, or, this evening, Saint-Loup and myself. For
instance: "A military critic of great insight, who had brilliantly
worked out, supporting them with proofs, the reasons for which, in the
Russo-Japanese war, the Japanese must inevitably be beaten and the
Russians victorious," or else: "He is an eminent gentleman who passes
for a great financier in political circles and for a great politician
among financiers." These stories were interchangeable with one about
Baron de Rothschild and one about Sir Rufus Israels, who were brought
into the conversation in an equivocal manner which might let it be
supposed that M. Bloch knew them personally.
I was myself taken in, and from the way in which M. Bloch spoke of
Bergotte I assumed that he too was an old friend. But with him as with
all famous people, M. Bloch knew them only "without actually knowing
them", from having seen them at a distance in the theatre or in the
street. He imagined, moreover, that his appearance, his name, his
personality were not unknown to them, and that when they caught sight of
him they had often to repress a stealthy inclination to bow. People in
society, because they know men of talent, original characters, and have
them to dine in their houses, do not on that account understand them any
better. But when one has lived to some extent in society, the silliness
of its inhabitants makes one too anxious to live, suppose too high a
standard of intelligence in the obscure circles in which people know
only "without actually knowing". I was to discover this when I
introduced the topic of Bergotte. M. Bloch was not the only one who was
a social success at home. My friend was even more so with his sisters,
whom he continually questioned in a hectoring tone, burying his face in
his plate, all of which made them laugh until they cried. They had
adopted their brother's language, and spoke it fluently, as if it had
been obligatory and the only form of speech that people of intelligence
might use. When we arrived, the eldest sister said to one of the younger
ones: "Go, tell our sage father and our venerable mother!" "Puppies,"
said Bloch, "I present to you the cavalier Saint-Loup, hurler of
javelins, who is come for a few days from Doncières to the dwellings of
polished stone, fruitful in horses." And, since he was as vulgar as he
was literary, his speech ended as a rule in some pleasantry of a less
Homeric kind: "See, draw closer your pepla with fair clasps, what is all
that that I see? Does your mother know you're out?" And the misses Bloch
subsided in a tempest of laughter. I told their brother how much
pleasure he had given me by recommending me to read Bergotte, whose
books I had loved.
M. Bloch senior, who knew Bergotte only by sight, and Bergotte's life
only from what was common gossip, had a manner quite as indirect of
making the acquaintance of his books, by the help of criticisms that
were apparently literary. He lived in the world of "very nearlies",
where people salute the empty air and arrive at wrong judgments.
Inexactitude, incompetence do not modify their assurance; quite the
contrary. It is the propitious miracle of self-esteem that, since few of
us are in a position to enjoy the society of distinguished people, or to
form intellectual friendships, those to whom they are denied still
believe themselves to be the best endowed of men, because the optics of
our social perspective make every grade of society seem the best to him
who occupies it, and beholds as less favoured than himself, less
fortunate and therefore to be pitied, the greater men whom he names and
calumniates without knowing, judges and despises without understanding
them. Even in cases where the multiplication of his modest personal
advantages by his self-esteem would not suffice to assure a man the dose
of happiness, superior to that accorded to others, which is essential to
him, envy is always there to make up the balance. It is true that if
envy finds expression in scornful phrases, we must translate "I have no
wish to know him" by "I have no means of knowing him." That is the
intellectual sense. But the emotional sense is indeed, "I have no wish
to know him." The speaker knows that it is not true, but he does not,
all the same, say it simply to deceive; he says it because it is what he
feels, and that is sufficient to bridge the gulf between them, that is
to say to make him happy.
Self-centredness thus enabling every human being to see the universe
spread out in a descending scale beneath himself who is its lord, M.
Bloch afforded himself the luxury of being pitiless when in the morning,
as he drank his chocolate, seeing Bergotte's signature at the foot of an
article in the newspaper which he had scarcely opened, he disdainfully
granted the writer an audience soon cut short, pronounced sentence upon
him, and gave himself the comforting pleasure of repeating after every
mouthful of the scalding brew: "That fellow Bergotte has become
unreadable. My word, what a bore the creature can be. I really must stop
my subscription. How involved it all is, bread and butter nonsense!" And
he helped himself to another slice.
This illusory importance of M. Bloch senior did, moreover, extend some
little way beyond the radius of his own perceptions. In the first place
his children regarded him as a superior person. Children have always a
tendency either to depreciate or to exalt their parents, and to a good
son his father is always the best of fathers, quite apart from any
objective reason there may be for admiring him. Now, such reasons were
not altogether lacking in the case of M. Bloch, who was an educated man,
shrewd, affectionate towards his family. In his most intimate circle
they were all the more proud of him because, if, in "society", people
are judged by a standard (which is incidentally absurd) and according to
false but fixed rules, by comparison with the aggregate of all the other
fashionable people, in the subdivisions of middle class life, on the
other hand, the dinners, the family parties all turn upon certain people
who are pronounced good company, amusing, and who in "society" would not
survive a second evening. Moreover in such an environment where the
artificial values of the aristocracy do not exist, their place is taken
by distinctions even more stupid. Thus it was that in his family circle,
and even among the remotest branches of the tree, an alleged similarity
in his way of wearing his moustache and in the bridge of his nose led to
M. Bloch's being called "the Duc d'Aumale's double". (In the world of
club pages, the one who wears his cap on one side and his jacket tightly
buttoned, so as to give himself the appearance, he imagines, of a
foreign officer, is he not also a personage of a sort to his comrades?)
The resemblance was the faintest, but you would have said that it
conferred a title. When he was mentioned, it would always be: "Bloch?
Which one? The Duc d'Aumale?" as people say "Princesse Murat? Which one?
The Queen (of Naples)?" And there were certain other minute marks which
combined to give him, in the eyes of the cousinhood, an acknowledged
claim to distinction. Not going the length of having a carriage of his
own, M. Bloch used on special occasions to hire an open victoria with a
pair of horses from the Company, and would drive through the Bois de
Boulogne, his body sprawling limply from side to side, two fingers
pressed to his brow, other two supporting his chin, and if people who
did not know him concluded that he was an "old nuisance", they were all
convinced, in the family, that for smartness Uncle Solomon could have
taught Gramont-Caderousse a thing or two. He was one of those people who
when they die, because for years they have shared a table in a
restaurant on the boulevard with its news-editor, are described as "well
known Paris figures" in the social column of the _Radical._ M. Bloch
told Saint-Loup and me that Bergotte knew so well why he, M. Bloch,
always cut him that as soon as he caught sight of him, at the theatre or
in the club, he avoided his eye. Saint-Loup blushed, for it had occurred
to him that this club could not be the Jockey, of which his father had
been chairman. On the other hand it must be a fairly exclusive club, for
M. Bloch had said that Bergotte would never have got into it if he had
come up now. So it was not without the fear that he might be
"underrating his adversary" that Saint-Loup asked whether the club in
question were the Rue Royale, which was considered "lowering" by his own
family, and to which he knew that certain Israelites had been admitted.
"No," replied M. Bloch in a tone at once careless, proud and ashamed,
"it is a small club, but far more pleasant than a big one, the Ganaches.
We're very strict there, don't you know." "Isn't Sir Rufus Israels the
chairman?" Bloch junior asked his father, so as to give him the
opportunity for a glorious lie, never suspecting that the financier had
not the same eminence in Saint-Loup's eyes as in his. The fact of the
matter was that the Ganaches club boasted not Sir Rufus Israels but one
of his staff. But as this man was on the best of terms with his
employer, he had at his disposal a stock of the financier's cards, and
would give one to M. Bloch whenever he wished to travel on a line of
which Sir Rufus was a director, the result of which was that old Bloch
would say: "I'm just going round to the Club to ask Sir Rufus for a line
to the Company." And the card enabled him to dazzle the guards on the
trains. The misses Bloch were more interested in Bergotte and, reverting
to him rather than pursue the subject of the Ganaches, the youngest
asked her brother, in the most serious tone imaginable, for she believed
that there existed in the world, for the designation of men of talent,
no other terms than those which he was in the habit of using: "Is he
really an amazing good egg, this Bergotte? Is he in the category of the
great lads, good eggs like Villiers and Catullus?" "I've met him several
times at dress rehearsals," said M. Nissim Bernard. "He is an uncouth
creature, a sort of Schlemihl." There was nothing very serious in this
allusion to Chamisso's story but the epithet "Schlemihl" formed part of
that dialect, half-German, half-Jewish, the use of which delighted M.
Bloch in the family circle, but struck him as vulgar and out of place
before strangers. And so he cast a reproving glance at his uncle. "He
has talent," said Bloch. "Ah!" His sister sighed gravely, as though to
imply that in that case there was some excuse for me. "All writers have
talent," said M. Bloch scornfully. "In fact it appears," went on his
son, raising his fork, and screwing up his eyes with an air of impish
irony, "that he is going to put up for the Academy." "Go on. He hasn't
enough to shew them," replied his father, who seemed not to have for the
Academy the same contempt as his son and daughters. "He's not big
enough." "Besides, the Academy is a salon, and Bergotte has no polish,"
declared the uncle (whose heiress Mme. Bloch was), a mild and
inoffensive person whose surname, Bernard, might perhaps by itself have
quickened my grandfather's powers of diagnosis, but would have appeared
too little in harmony with a face which looked as if it had been brought
back from Darius's palace and restored by Mme. Dieulafoy, had not
(chosen by some collector desirous of giving a crowning touch of
orientalism to this figure from Susa) his first name, Nissim, stretched
out above it the pinions of an androcephalous bull from Khorsabad. But
M. Bloch never stopped insulting his uncle, whether it was that he was
excited by the unresisting good-humour of his butt, or that the rent of
the villa being paid by M. Nissim Bernard, the beneficiary wished to
shew that he kept his independence, and, more important still, that he
was not seeking by flattery to make sure of the rich inheritance to
come. What most hurt the old man was being treated so rudely in front of
the manservant. He murmured an unintelligible sentence of which all that
could be made out was: "when the meschores are in the room".
"Meschores", in the Bible, means "the servant of God". In the family
circle the Blochs used the word when they referred to their own
servants, and were always exhilarated by it, because their certainty of
not being understood either by Christians or by the servants themselves
enhanced in M. Nissim Bernard and M. Bloch their twofold distinction of
being "masters" and at the same time "Jews". But this latter source of
satisfaction became a source of displeasure when there was "company". At
such times M. Bloch, hearing his uncle say "meschores", felt that he was
making his oriental side too prominent, just as a light-of-love who has
invited some of her sisters to meet her respectable friends is annoyed
if they allude to their profession or use words that do not sound quite
nice. Therefore, so far from his uncle's request's producing any effect
on M. Bloch, he, beside himself with rage, could contain himself no
longer. He let no opportunity pass of scarifying his wretched uncle. "Of
course, when there is a chance of saying anything stupid, one can be
quite certain that you won't miss it. You would be the first to lick his
boots if he were in the room!" shouted M. Bloch, while M. Nissim Bernard
in sorrow lowered over his plate the ringleted beard of King Sargon. My
friend, when he began to grow his beard, which also was blue-black and
crimped, became very like his great-uncle.
"What! Are you the son of the Marquis de Marsantes? Why, I knew him very
well," said M. Nissim Bernard to Saint-Loup. I supposed that he meant
the word "knew" in the sense in which Bloch's father had said that he
knew Bergotte, namely by sight. But he went on: "Your father was one of
my best friends." Meanwhile Bloch had turned very red, his father was
looking intensely cross, the misses Bloch were choking with suppressed
laughter. The fact was that in M. Nissim Bernard the love of ostentation
which in M. Bloch and his children was held in check, had engendered the
habit of perpetual lying. For instance, if he was staying in an hotel,
M. Nissim Bernard, as M. Bloch equally might have done, would have his
newspapers brought to him always by his valet in the dining-room, in the
middle of luncheon, when everybody was there, so that they should see
that he travelled with a valet. But to the people with whom he made
friends in the hotel the uncle used to say what the nephew would never
have said, that he was a Senator. He might know quite well that they
would sooner or later discover that the title was usurped; he could not,
at the critical moment, resist the temptation to assume it. M. Bloch
suffered acutely from his uncle's lies and from all the embarrassments
that they led to. "Don't pay any attention to him, he talks a great deal
of nonsense," he whispered to Saint-Loup, whose interest was all the
more whetted, for he was curious to explore the psychology of liars. "A
greater liar even than the Ithacan Odysseus, albeit Athene called him
the greatest liar among mortals," his son completed the indictment.
"Well, upon my word!" cried M. Nissim Bernard, "If I'd only known that I
was going to sit down to dinner with my old friend's son! Why, I have a
photograph still of your father at home, in Paris, and any number of
letters from him. He used always to call me 'uncle', nobody ever knew
why. He was a charming man, sparkling. I remember so well a dinner I
gave at Nice; there were Sardou, Labiche, Augier," "Molière, Racine,
Corneille," M. Bloch added with sarcasm, while his son completed the
tale of guests with "Plautus, Menander, Kalidasa." M. Nissim Bernard,
cut to the quick, stopped short in his reminiscence, and, ascetically
depriving himself of a great pleasure, remained silent until the end of
dinner.
"Saint-Loup with helm of bronze," said Bloch, "have a piece more of this
duck with thighs heavy with fat, over which the illustrious sacrificer
of birds has spilled numerous libations of red wine."
As a rule, after bringing out from his store for the entertainment of a
distinguished guest his anecdotes of Sir Rufus Israels and others, M.
Bloch, feeling that he had succeeded in touching and melting his son's
heart, would withdraw, so as not to spoil his effect in the eyes of the
"big pot". If, however, there was an absolutely compelling reason, as
for instance on the night when his son won his fellowship, M. Bloch
would add to the usual string of anecdotes the following ironical
reflexion which he ordinarily reserved for his own personal friends, so
that young Bloch was extremely proud to see it produced for his: "The
Government have acted unpardonably. They have forgotten to consult M.
Coquelin! M. Coquelin has let it be known that he is displeased." (M.
Bloch prided himself on being a reactionary, with a contempt for
theatrical people.)
But the misses Bloch and their brother reddened to the tips of their
ears, so much impressed were they when Bloch senior, to shew that he
could be regal to the last in his entertainment of his son's two
'chums', gave the order for champagne to be served, and announced
casually that, as a treat for us, he had taken three stalls for the
performance which a company from the Opéra-Comique was giving that
evening at the Casino. He was sorry that he had not been able to get a
box. They had all been taken. However, he had often been in the boxes,
and really one saw and heard better down by the orchestra. All very
well, only, if the defect of his son, that is to say the defect which
his son believed to be invisible to other people, was coarseness, the
father's was avarice. And so it was in a decanter that we were served
with, under the name of champagne, a light sparkling wine, while under
that of orchestra stalls he had taken three in the pit, which cost half
as much, miraculously persuaded by the divine intervention of his defect
that neither at table nor in the theatre (where the boxes were all
empty) would the defect be noticed. When M. Bloch had let us moisten our
lips in the flat glasses which his son dignified with the style and tide
of "craters with deeply hollowed flanks", he made us admire a picture to
which he was so much attached that he had brought it with him to Balbec.
He told us that it was a Rubens. Saint-Loup asked innocently if it was
signed. M. Bloch replied, blushing, that he had had the signature cut
off to make it fit the frame, but that it made no difference, as he had
no intention of selling the picture. Then he hurriedly bade us good
night, in order to bury himself in the _Journal Officiel_, back numbers
of which littered the house, and which, he informed us, he was obliged
to read carefully on account of his "parliamentary position" as to the
precise nature of which, however, he gave us no enlightenment. "I shall
take a muffler," said Bloch, "for Zephyrus and Boreas are disputing to
which of them shall belong the fish-teeming sea, and should we but tarry
a little after the show is over, we shall not be home before the first
flush of Eos, the rosy-fingered. By the way," he asked Saint-Loup when
we were outside, and I trembled, for I realised at once that it was of
M. de Charlus that Bloch was speaking in that tone of irony, "who was
that excellent old card dressed in black that I saw you walking with,
the day before yesterday, on the beach?" "That was my uncle." Saint-Loup
was ruffled. Unfortunately, a "floater" was far from seeming to Bloch a
thing to be avoided. He shook with laughter. "Heartiest congratulations;
I ought to have guessed; he has an excellent style, the most priceless
dial of an old 'gaga' of the highest lineage." "You are absolutely
mistaken; he is an extremely clever man," retorted Saint-Loup, now
furious. "I am sorry about that; it makes him less complete. All the
same, I should like very much to know him, for I flatter myself I could
write some highly adequate pieces about old buffers like that. Just to
see him go by, he's killing. But I should leave out of account the
caricaturale side, which really is hardly worthy of an artist enamoured
of the plastic beauty of phrases, of his mug, which (you'll forgive me)
doubled me up for a moment with joyous laughter, and I should bring into
prominence the aristocratic side of your uncle, who after all has a
distinct bovine effect, and when one has finished laughing does impress
one by his great air of style. But," he went on, addressing myself this
time, "there is also a matter of a very different order about which I
have been meaning to question you, and every time we are together, some
god, blessed denizen of Olympus, makes me completely forget to ask for a
piece of information which might before now have been and is sure some
day to be of the greatest use to me. Tell me, who was the lovely lady I
saw you with in the Jardin d'Acclimatation accompanied by a gentleman
whom I seem to know by sight and a little girl with long hair?" It had
been quite plain to me at the time that Mme. Swann did not remember
Bloch's name, since she had spoken of him by another, and had described
my friend as being on the staff of some Ministry, as to which I had
never since then thought of finding out whether he had joined it. But
how came it that Bloch, who, according to what she then told me, had got
himself introduced to her, was ignorant of her name? I was so much
surprised that I stopped for a moment before answering. "Whoever she
is," he went on, "hearty congratulations; you can't have been bored with
her. I picked her up a few days before that on the Zone railway, where,
speaking of zones, she was so kind, as to undo hers for the benefit of
your humble servant; I have never had such a time in my life, and we
were just going to make arrangements to meet again when somebody she
knew had the bad taste to get in at the last station but one." My
continued silence did not appear to please Bloch. "I was hoping," he
said, "thanks to you, to learn her address, so as to go there several
times a week to taste in her arms the delights of Eros, dear to the
gods; but I do not insist since you seem pledged to discretion with
respect to a professional who gave herself to me three times running,
and in the most refined manner, between Paris and the Point-du-Jour. I
am bound to see her again, some night."
I called upon Bloch after this dinner; he returned my call, but I was
out and he was seen asking for me by Françoise, who, as it happened,
albeit he had visited us at Combray, had never set eyes on him until
then. So that she knew only that one of "the gentlemen" who were friends
of mine had looked in to see me, she did not know "with what object",
dressed in a nondescript way, which had not made any particular
impression upon her. Now though I knew quite well that certain of
Françoise's social ideas must for ever remain impenetrable by me, ideas
based, perhaps, partly upon confusions between words, between names
which she had once and for all time mistaken for one another, I could
not restrain myself, who had long since abandoned the quest for
enlightenment in such cases, from seeking--and seeking, moreover, in
vain--to discover what could be the immense significance that the name
of Bloch had for Françoise. For no sooner had I mentioned to her that
the young man whom she had seen was M. Bloch than she recoiled several
paces, so great were her stupor and disappointment. "What! Is that M.
Bloch?" she cried, thunderstruck, as if so portentous a personage ought
to have been endowed with an appearance which "made you know" as soon as
you saw him that you were in the presence of one of the great ones of
the earth; and, like some one who has discovered that an historical
character is not "up to" the level of his reputation, she repeated in an
impressed tone, in which I could detect latent, for future growth, the
seeds of a universal scepticism: "What! Is that M. Bloch? Well, really,
you would never think it, to look at him." She seemed also to bear me a
grudge, as if I had always "overdone" the praise of Bloch to her. At the
same time she was kind enough to add: "Well, he may be M. Bloch, and all
that. I'm sure Master can say he's every bit as good."
She had presently, with respect to Saint-Loup, whom she worshipped, a
disillusionment of a different kind and of less severity: she discovered
that he was a Republican. Now for all that, when speaking, for instance,
of the Queen of Portugal, she would say with that disrespect which is,
among the people, the supreme form of respect: "Amélie, Philippe's
sister," Françoise was a Royalist. But when it came to a Marquis; a
Marquis who had dazzled her at first sight, and who was for the
Republic, seemed no longer real. And she shewed the same ill-humour as
if I had given her a box which she had believed to be made of gold, and
had thanked me for it effusively, and then a jeweller had revealed to
her that it was only plated. She at once withdrew her esteem from
Saint-Loup, but soon afterwards restored it to him, having reflected
that he could not, being the Marquis de Saint-Loup, be a Republican,
that he was just pretending, in his own interest, for with such a
Government as we had it might be a great advantage to him. From that
moment her coldness towards him, her resentment towards myself ceased.
And when she spoke of Saint-Loup she said: "He is a hypocrite," with a
broad and friendly smile which made it clear that she "considered" him
again just as much as when she first knew him, and that she had forgiven
him.
As a matter of fact, Saint-Loup was absolutely sincere and
disinterested, and it was this intense moral purity which, not being
able to find entire satisfaction in a selfish sentiment such as love,
nor on the other hand meeting in him the impossibility (which existed in
me, for instance) of finding its spiritual nourishment elsewhere than in
himself, rendered him truly capable (just as I was incapable) of
friendship.
Françoise was no less mistaken about Saint-Loup when she complained
that he had "that sort of" air, as if he did not look down upon the
people, but that it was all just a pretence, and you had only to see him
when he was in a temper with his groom. It had indeed sometimes happened
that Robert would scold his groom with a certain amount of brutality,
which proved that he had the sense not so much of the difference as of
the equality between classes and masses. "But," he said in answer to my
rebuke of his having treated the man rather harshly, "why should I go
out of my way to speak politely to him? Isn't he my equal? Isn't he just
as near to me as any of my uncles and cousins? You seem to think that I
ought to treat him with respect, as an inferior. You talk like an
aristocrat!" he added scornfully.
And indeed if there was a class to which he shewed himself prejudiced
and hostile, it was the aristocracy, so much so that he found it as hard
to believe in the superior qualities of a man in society as he found it
easy to believe in those of a man of the people. When I mentioned the
Princesse de Luxembourg, whom I had met with his aunt:
"An old trout," was his comment. "Like all that lot. She's a sort of
cousin of mine, by the way."
Having a strong prejudice against the people who frequented it, he went
rarely into "Society", and the contemptuous or hostile attitude which he
adopted towards it served to increase, among all his near relatives, the
painful impression made by his intimacy with a woman on the stage, a
connexion which, they declared, would be his ruin, blaming it specially
for having bred in him that spirit of denigration, that bad spirit, and
for having led him astray, after which it was only a matter of time
before he would have dropped out altogether. And so, many easy-going men
of the Faubourg Saint-Germain were without compunction when they spoke
of Robert's mistress. "Those girls do their job," they would say, "they
are as good as anybody else. But that one; no, thank you! We cannot
forgive her. She has done too much harm to a fellow we were fond of." Of
course, he was not the first to be caught in that snare. But the others
amused themselves like men of the world, continued to think like men of
the world about politics, about everything. As for him, his family found
him "soured". They did not bear in mind that, for many young men of
fashion who would otherwise remain uncultivated mentally, rough in their
friendships, without gentleness or taste--it is very often their
mistress who is their real master, and connexions of this sort the only
school of morals in which they are initiated into a superior culture,
and learn the value of disinterested relations. Even among the lower
orders (who, when it comes to coarseness, so often remind us of the
world of fashion) the woman, more sensitive, finer, more leisured, is
driven by curiosity to adopt certain refinements, respects certain
beauties of sentiment and of art which, though she may fail to
understand them, she nevertheless places above what has seemed most
desirable to the man, above money or position. Now whether the mistress
be a young blood's (such as Saint-Loup) or a young workman's
(electricians, for instance, must now be included in our truest order of
Chivalry) her lover has too much admiration and respect for her not to
extend them also to what she herself respects and admires; and for him
the scale of values is thereby reversed. Her sex alone makes her weak;
she suffers from nervous troubles, inexplicable things which in a man,
or even in another woman--a woman whose nephew or cousin he was--would
bring a smile to the lips of this stalwart young man. But he cannot bear
to see her suffer whom he loves. The young nobleman who, like
Saint-Loup, has a mistress acquires the habit, when he takes her out to
dine, of carrying in his pocket the valerian "drops" which she may need,
of ordering the waiter, firmly and with no hint of sarcasm, to see that
he shuts the doors quietly and not to put any damp moss on the table, so
as to spare his companion those discomforts which himself he has never
felt, which compose for him an occult world in whose reality she has
taught him to believe, discomforts for which he now feels pity without
in the least needing to understand them, for which he will still feel
pity when other women than she shall be the sufferers. Saint-Loup's
mistress--as the first monks of the middle ages taught Christendom--had
taught him to be kind to animals, for which she had a passion, never
moving without her dog, her canaries, her love-birds; Saint-Loup looked
after them with motherly devotion and treated as brutes the people who
were not good to dumb creatures. On the other hand, an actress, or
so-called actress, like this one who was living with him,--whether she
were intelligent or not, and as to that I had no knowledge--by making
him find the society of fashionable women boring, and look upon having
to go out to a party as a painful duty, had saved him from snobbishness
and cured him of frivolity. If, thanks to her, his social engagements
filled a smaller place in the life of her young lover, at the same time,
whereas if he had been simply a drawing-room man, vanity or
self-interest would have dictated his choice of friends as rudeness
would have characterised his treatment of them, his mistress had taught
him to bring nobility and refinement into his friendship. With her
feminine instinct, with a keener appreciation in men of certain
qualities of sensibility which her lover might perhaps, without her
guidance, have misunderstood and laughed at them, she had always been
swift to distinguish from among the rest of Saint-Loup's friends, the
one who had a real affection for him, and to make that one her
favourite. She knew how to make him feel grateful to such a friend, shew
his gratitude, notice what things gave his friend pleasure and what
pain. And presently Saint-Loup, without any more need of her to prompt
him, began to think of all these things by himself, and at Balbec, where
she was not with him, for me whom she had never seen, whom he had
perhaps not yet so much as mentioned in his letters to her, of his own
accord would pull up the window of a carriage in which I was sitting,
take out of the room the flowers that made me feel unwell, and when he
had to say good-bye to several people at once manage to do so before it
was actually time for him to go, so as to be left alone and last with
me, to make that distinction between them and me, to treat me
differently from the rest. His mistress had opened his mind to the
invisible, had brought a serious element into his life, delicacy into
his heart, but all this escaped his sorrowing family who repeated: "That
creature will be the death of him; meanwhile she's doing what she can to
disgrace him." It is true that he had succeeded in getting out of her
all the good that she was capable of doing him; and that she now caused
him only incessant suffering, for she had taken an intense dislike to
him and tormented him in every possible way. She had begun, one fine
day, to look upon him as stupid and absurd because the friends that she
had among the younger writers and actors had assured her that he was,
and she duly repeated what they had said with that passion, that want of
reserve which we shew whenever we receive from without and adopt as our
own opinions or customs of which we previously knew nothing. She readily
professed, like her actor friends, that between Saint-Loup and herself
there was a great gulf fixed, and not to be crossed, because they were
of different races, because she was an intellectual and he, whatever he
might pretend, the born enemy of the intellect. This view of him seemed
to her profound, and she sought confirmation of it in the most
insignificant words, the most trivial actions of her lover. But when the
same friends had further convinced her that she was destroying, in
company so ill-suited to her, the great hopes which she had, they said,
aroused in them, that her lover would leave a mark on her, that by
living with him she was spoiling her future as an artist; to her
contempt for Saint-Loup was added the same hatred that she would have
felt for him if he had insisted upon inoculating her with a deadly germ.
She saw him as seldom as possible, at the same time postponing the hour
of a definite rupture, which seemed to me a highly improbable event.
Saint-Loup made such sacrifices for her that unless she was ravishingly
beautiful (but he had always refused to shew me her photograph, saying:
"For one thing, she's not a beauty, and besides she always takes badly.
These are only some snapshots that I took myself with my kodak; they
would give you a wrong idea of her.") it would surely be difficult for
her to find another man who would consent to anything of the sort. I
never reflected that a certain obsession to make a name for oneself,
even when one has no talent, that the admiration, no more than the
privately expressed admiration of people who are imposing on one, can
(although it may not perhaps have been the case with Saint-Loup's
mistress) be, even for a little prostitute, motives more determining
than the pleasure of making money. Saint-Loup who, without quite
understanding what was going on in the mind of his mistress, did not
believe her to be completely sincere either in her unfair reproaches or
in her promises of undying love, had all the same at certain moments the
feeling that she would break with him whenever she could, and
accordingly, impelled no doubt by the instinct of self-preservation
which was part of his love, a love more clear-sighted, possibly, than
Saint-Loup himself, making use, too, of a practical capacity for
business which was compatible in him with the loftiest and blindest
flights of the heart, had refused to settle upon her any capital, had
borrowed an enormous sum so that she should want nothing, but made it
over to her only from day to day. And no doubt, assuming that she really
thought of leaving him, she was calmly waiting until she had feathered
her nest, a process which, with the money given her by Saint-Loup, would
not perhaps take very long, but would all the same require a time which
must be conceded to prolong the happiness of my new friend--or his
misery.
This dramatic period of their connexion, which had now reached its most
acute stage, the most cruel for Saint-Loup, for she had forbidden him to
remain in Paris, where his presence exasperated her, and had forced him
to spend his leave at Balbec, within easy reach of his regiment--had
begun one evening at the house of one of Saint-Loup's aunts, on whom he
had prevailed to allow his friend to come there, before a large party,
to recite some of the speeches from a symbolical play in which she had
once appeared in an "advanced" theatre, and for which she had made him
share the admiration that she herself professed.
But when she appeared in the room, with a large lily in her hand, and
wearing a costume copied from the _Ancilia Domini_, which she had
persuaded Saint-Loup was an absolute "vision of beauty", her entrance
had been greeted, in that assemblage of club men and duchesses, with
smiles which the monotonous tone of her chantings, the oddity of certain
words and their frequent recurrence had changed into fits of laughter,
stifled at first but presently so uncontrollable that the wretched
reciter had been unable to go on. Next day Saint-Loup's aunt had been
universally censured for having allowed so grotesque an actress to
appear in her drawing-room. A well-known duke made no bones about telling
her that she had only herself to blame if she found herself criticised.
"Damn it all, people really don't come to see 'turns' like that! If the
woman had talent, even; but she has none and never will have any. 'Pon my
soul, Paris is not such a fool as people make out. Society does not
consist exclusively of imbeciles. This little lady evidently believed
that she was going to take Paris by surprise. But Paris is not so easily
surprised as all that, and there are still some things that they can't
make us swallow."
As for the actress, she left the house with Saint-Loup, exclaiming:
"What do you mean by letting me in for those geese, those uneducated
bitches, those dirty corner-boys? I don't mind telling you, there wasn't
a man in the room who didn't make eyes at me or squeeze my foot, and it
was because I wouldn't look at them that they were out for revenge."
Words which had changed Robert's antipathy for people in society into a
horror that was at once deep and distressing, and was provoked in him
most of all by those who least deserved it, devoted kinsmen who, on
behalf of the family, had sought to persuade Saint-Loup's lady to break
with him, a move which she represented to him as inspired by their
passion for her. Robert, although he had at once ceased to see them,
used to imagine when he was parted from his mistress as he was now, that
they or others like them were profiting by his absence to return to the
charge and had possibly prevailed over her. And when he spoke of the
sensualists who were disloyal to their friends, who sought to seduce
their friends' wives, tried to make them come to houses of assignation,
his whole face would glow with suffering and hatred.
"I would kill them with less compunction than I would kill a dog, which
is at least a well-behaved beast, and loyal and faithful. There are men
who deserve the guillotine if you like, far more than poor wretches who
have been led into crime by poverty and by the cruelty of the rich."
He spent the greater part of his time in sending letters and telegrams
to his mistress. Every time that, while still preventing him from
returning to Paris, she found an excuse to quarrel with him by post, I
read the news at once in his evident discomposure. Inasmuch as his
mistress never told him what fault she found with him, suspecting that
possibly if she did not tell him it was because she did not know
herself, and simply had had enough of him, he would still have liked an
explanation and used to write to her: "Tell me what I have done wrong; I
am quite ready to acknowledge my faults," the grief that overpowered him
having the effect of persuading him that he had behaved badly.
But she kept him waiting indefinitely for her answers which, when they
did come, were meaningless. And so it was almost always with a furrowed
brow, and often with empty hands that I would see Saint-Loup returning
from the post office, where, alone in all the hotel, he and Françoise
went to fetch or to hand in letters, he from a lover's impatience, she
with a servant's mistrust of others. (His telegrams obliged him to take
a much longer journey.)