TO THE REV. HENRY ZOUCH.

ARLINGTON STREET, _March_ 20, 1762.

I am glad you are pleased, Sir, with my "Anecdotes of Painting;" but I

doubt you praise me too much: it was an easy task when I had the

materials collected, and I would not have the labours of forty years,

which was Vertue's case, depreciated in compliment to the work of four

months, which is almost my whole merit. Style is become, in a manner, a

mechanical affair, and if to much ancient lore our antiquaries would add

a little modern reading, to polish their language and correct their

prejudices, I do not see why books of antiquities should not be made as

amusing as writings on any other subject. If Tom Hearne had lived in the

world, he might have writ an agreeable history of dancing; at least, I

am sure that many modern volumes are read for no reason but for their

being penned in the dialect of the age.

I am much beholden to you, dear Sir, for your remarks; they shall have

their due place whenever the work proceeds to a second edition, for that

the nature of it as a record will ensure to it. A few of your notes

demand a present answer: the Bishop of Imola pronounced the nuptial

benediction at the marriage of Henry VII., which made me suppose him the

person represented.[1]

[Footnote 1: In a previous letter Walpole mentions that Vertue (the

engraver) had disputed the subject of this picture, because the face of

the King did not resemble other pictures of him; but Walpole was

convinced of the correctness of his description of it, because it does

resemble the face on Henry's shillings, "which are more authentic than

pictures."]

Burnet, who was more a judge of characters than statues, mentions the

resemblance between Tiberius and Charles II.; but, as far as

countenances went, there could not be a more ridiculous prepossession;

Charles had a long face, with very strong lines, and a narrowish brow;

Tiberius a very square face, and flat forehead, with features rather

delicate in proportion. I have examined this imaginary likeness, and see

no kind of foundation for it. It is like Mr. Addison's Travels,[1] of

which it was so truly said, he might have composed them without stirring

out of England. There are a kind of naturalists who have sorted out the

qualities of the mind, and allotted particular turns of features and

complexions to them. It would be much easier to prove that every form

has been endowed with every vice. One has heard much of the vigour of

Burnet himself; yet I dare to say, he did not think himself like Charles

II.

[Footnote 1: It is Fielding who, in his "Voyage to Lisbon," gave this

character to Addison's "Travels."]

I am grieved, Sir, to hear that your eyes suffer; take care of them;

nothing can replace the satisfaction they afford: one should hoard them,

as the only friend that will not be tired of one when one grows old,

and when one should least choose to depend on others for entertainment.

I most sincerely wish you happiness and health in that and every other

instance.

_BIRTH OF THE PRINCE OF WALES--THE CZARINA--VOLTAIRE'S HISTORICAL

CRITICISMS--IMMENSE VALUE OF THE TREASURES BROUGHT OVER IN THE

"HERMIONE."_

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume I · 第 117 / 143 题