CHAPTER XII

"CARPET-BAG" AND NEGRO DOMINATION IN THE SOUTHERN STATES BETWEEN 1868

AND 1876

Escape of Virginia, Georgia and Texas from Negro Rule--North Carolina's

Rapid Recovery from Negro Rule--The Loyal League--Origin of the K. K.

K.'s--Methods of the Ku-Klux--Periods in the History of Negro Rule--The

Act for the Enforcement of the New Amendments--The Corruption in the

New "State" Governments--The Supplemental Enforcement Act--The

President's Proclamation of March 23d, 1871--The Ku-Klux Act of April

20th, 1871--Interference of the United States Military Power in the

Affairs of South Carolina--The President's Proclamation of May 3d,

1871--The President's Proclamation to the People of South Carolina--The

Ku-Klux Trials--Corruption in the "State" Governments of the South--The

Revolt in the Republican Party--The Liberal Republican Convention of

1872--Acceptance of the Liberal Republican Candidates by the

Democrats--Division in the Democratic Party--The Republican Platform

and Nominees--The Republican Triumph--Events in Alabama--Events in

Louisiana--The Downward Course between 1872 and 1874--The Elections of

1874--The Change in Alabama, Arkansas and Texas--The Status in South

Carolina in 1874--The Day of Complete Deliverance--The Status in

Mississippi in 1875--Fiat Money and the Resumption of Specie

Payments--The Inflation Bill of 1874 and the Veto of it by the

President.

[Sidenote: Escape of Virginia, Georgia and Texas from negro rule.]

Virginia, Texas and Georgia had been in no great hurry, as we have

seen, to exchange military government exercised by the white officers

of the United States army for "State" government under the electorate

proposed in the Reconstruction Acts. In this they were wise. The army

officers did not, as a rule, sympathize with the radical {248}

movements of the Republicans in Congress, and they so executed the

duties imposed upon them as to cause the least suffering and

inconvenience. Their rule, though exercised under a repellent title,

was in fact far milder than, and far preferable to, the civil

government of the adventurer and the negro. They mingled socially with

the old families, and, in many cases, married their fair daughters. The

common soldiers from the Northern "States" also fraternized with their

race relatives in the South. They did not fancy the black soldiers

either of the regular army or the "State" militia, and many were the

cases in which they intervened between the defenceless ex-Confederates

and the brutal blacks in blue. It is even said by men who have every

opportunity to know that many of them doffed their uniforms on election

day, went to the polls, and voted the Democratic ticket.

In spite of the threats of Congress, and the ever-increasing conditions

imposed by that body upon the permission to resume the "State" status,

these three communities held out under military rule until so many of

their leading citizens had been amnestied by Congress and made again

eligible to office and mandate, and until so much better provisions

concerning the enfranchisement of the ex-Confederates had been secured,

as to put them in a far better position to resume "State" government

than was the case two years before. Moreover, these communities had

larger white than black populations. After their full restoration,

consequently, Virginia and Georgia escaped largely the suffering

experienced by most of the others, and Texas also managed to pull

through the years from 1870 to 1874 with only about a four-fold

increase of taxation, and the creation of a debt of only about

5,000,000 of dollars, when she reached the period of union of almost

all her best citizens in the {249} Democratic party, which, in the

election of Richard Coke as Governor in 1874, and of a majority of the

legislative members, permanently triumphed in Texas. Mississippi also

had held back in 1868 and 1869, as we have seen, in order to secure

better terms for the ex-Confederates in the enfranchising and

disfranchising provisions of the "State" constitution, and by doing so

had accomplished this result. But Mississippi was one of the three

Southern communities in which the negro population far outnumbered the

white. Mississippi was not, for this reason chiefly, so fortunate as

Virginia, Texas and Georgia. She was obliged, with South Carolina and

Louisiana, to pass through the fiery furnace in order to fuse the

respectable white elements in her population into a single political

party with a well-understood and a well-determined purpose.

[Sidenote: North Carolina's rapid recovery from negro rule.]

Of all the "States" included in the Congressional Act of June 25th,

1868, only North Carolina had been fortunate enough to rid herself,

before 1872, of the rule of the adventurers and their ignorant negro

support. This happened because matters were driven to a crisis sooner

here than elsewhere. The legislature of 1868 had proceeded promptly to

authorize the issue of $25,000,000 of bonds, when the whole taxable

property of the "State" was not over $125,000,000. From the first

moment the people were threatened with confiscation, and when to this

was added the legislative act, known as the Schaffner law, authorizing

the Governor to suspend civil government, and institute martial law in

any part of the "State," and when he actually undertook to do so in

three counties of the "State," the whites came together in the election

of 1870, captured the legislature and redeemed the "State" from the

hideous tyranny with which it was threatened.

{250} [Sidenote: The Loyal League.]

Already before the Reconstruction Acts were passed, the political

adventurers in the South had begun organizing the negroes into secret

bodies, known later as the Union or Loyal League. The members of these

bodies were sworn to obey the decisions of the organization and to

execute them. The original idea seems to have been a combination for

protection against bands of lawless white people, and for mutual aid

and assistance in the hard struggle for existence to which the freedmen

were now exposed. The League soon took on, however, a political

character, and became a sort of Republican party organization in the

South.

[Sidenote: Origin of the K. K. K.'s.]

It is difficult to determine whether the Ku-Klux organization preceded

that of the Loyal League and provoked it or not. So far as we know,

both of them were first heard of in the year 1866. It is probable that

the Ku-Klux had its origin a little farther north than the Loyal

League. It is said by those who profess to know most about it, that the

first appearance of this body was in one of the southern counties of

Tennessee, Giles County; that it was first organized by a lot of young

loafers, probably ex-Confederate soldiers, who lived in the town of

Pulaski, the county town of that county; and that their first purpose

was the playing of practical jokes upon the ignorant and superstitious

negroes of the neighborhood. They operated in the night-time, went

disguised, travelled on horseback, their horses being also disguised,

and were oath-bound to execute the decisions of the organization, and

to protect each other. Whatever may have been its origin, this body

also soon found its political usefulness. It soon proved to be a

powerful means for intimidating and terrorizing the negroes, and also

white men acting with the negroes.

{251} [Sidenote: Methods of the Ku-Klux.]

After the Reconstruction Acts were passed and put into operation, and

especially after the Southern communities were reorganized as "States"

under them, and the military governments gave way to the "State"

governments, this organization spread all over the South, and

contributed much by its violent and unlawful methods toward wringing

finally the new "State" governments of the South from the hands of the

negroes and the "carpet-baggers." As it extended, its methods became

more lawless and violent. Its members whipped, plundered, burned,

abducted, imprisoned, tortured and murdered, for the prime purpose of

keeping the negroes from exercising suffrage and holding office. They

were protected by many respectable people who would not have

participated personally in their nefarious work. And they had

confederates everywhere, who, upon the witness stand and in the jury

box, would perjure themselves to prevent their conviction and

punishment. It was even said that there were many cases where members

of these Klans were able to have themselves subpoenaed as witnesses, or

summoned as jurors, in the trials of their comrades, and that they were

sworn to perjure themselves, if necessary, to clear each other. The

respectable people of the South tried to make it appear that these

lawless bands were simply freebooters, such as generally infest a

country for a time after a period of war, and had no political meaning

or purpose whatsoever; and it is probably true that the Klans never

went beyond county organization, any wider bond than the county

organization, or Klan, being rather the moral bond of a common purpose;

but it cannot be well questioned now that they had one purpose at least

in common, and that that was a chief purpose with them all, viz., to

terrorize the negro out of the exercise of his {252} newly-granted

privileges of suffrage and office-holding, and keep him in his place as

a menial.

[Sidenote: The naturalness of these organizations.]

The appearance of both the Loyal Leagues and the Ku-Klux Klans in the

manner in which they appeared, and at the time when they appeared,

ought not to cause any surprise to the student of history. Under the

reconstruction of the Southern communities as pursued before March of

1867 it seemed as if the freedmen were to be left to the tender mercies

of their former masters, irritated against them by the act of the North

in emancipating them, and by failure in war to prevent it. It was

entirely natural, not to say praiseworthy, for them to combine for the

defence of their newly found rights, and for mutual assistance in the

hard battle against want which they were now obliged to wage. And it

was no less natural that they should look for the intellectual power

necessary for forming such combinations to the white men from the North

who had helped them out of their bondage, and had given them food and

clothes in their hunger and nakedness.

And, again, when by the Reconstruction Acts and the restoration of

martial law in the South under them, Congress turned the tables upon

the Southern white people, and placed the ignorant barbarians in

political control of them, and made every open attempt to resist this

control a penal offence, it was also rather natural, though not

praiseworthy, that men should have bound themselves together by secret

oaths to do anything and everything in their power to defeat this

blunder-crime against civilization. Whether natural or not, it always

happens when such attempts are made, and it is always to be expected.

[Sidenote: The opportunity for political adventurers.]

But to return to the order of the narrative. The formation of the Union

Leagues in 1867 and 1868 enabled {253} the negroes to vote in these

years for delegates to the constitutional conventions required under

the Reconstruction Acts, and to vote upon the ratification of the

constitutions framed by them, and to participate in the election for

the "State" officers and legislative members under those constitutions,

with the help and under the direction of these organizations, and to

operate the newly established "State" governments under the same

direction. This opened the way for the "carpet-bag" governments in the

Southern "States," whose deeds may be now briefly narrated.

[Sidenote: Periods in the history of negro rule.]

The landing places in this story may be placed at the years 1872, 1874,

and 1876. The year 1872 is the date of the national revolt against the

policy of the Washington government in the affairs of the reconstructed

"States." The year 1874 is the date when some of the reconstructed

"States" succeeded in overthrowing carpet-bag and negro rule, and the

Democrats succeeded in electing a majority of members in the lower

House of Congress. And the year 1876 is the date of the complete

overthrow of that rule and the complete establishment of the "solid

South" under white Democratic government.

[Sidenote: The Act for the enforcement of the new Amendments.]

Before all of the Southern communities had been admitted to

representation in Congress, and before any of them except Tennessee had

gotten fairly under way with their new "State" governments, a bill was

presented in Congress to provide for the enforcement of the Fourteenth

and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. It

will be remembered that these Amendments authorized the exercise of

power by the United States Government against "State" action only. They

read: "No _State_ shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the

privileges or immunities of a citizen of {254} the United States; nor

shall any _State_ deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,

without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its

jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws"; and "the right of

citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged

by the United States or by any _State_ on account of race, color or

previous condition of servitude."

It is entirely clear from this language that, in the enforcement of

these new provisions of the Constitution, the United States Government

must direct its powers against the action of the "States,"

respectively, through their legislators and officials, and against that

only. But in this bill which became law on the 31st of May, 1870,

Congress enacted penalties not only against "State" officers and agents

for the violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, but

severe penalties against any _person_ within the "States," as well as

the Territories, who should undertake to deprive by unlawful means any

other person of his right to qualify and vote at any election, and

against any _person_ who under color of any law, statute or ordinance,

regulation or custom, should undertake to deprive any other person of

his civil rights and civil equality. Congress also, in this Act, vested

the jurisdiction over such cases in the United States courts and

authorized the President of the United States to enforce their

decisions by the aid of the United States army and navy if necessary.

Now, while it may probably be rightly claimed that the _Thirteenth_

Amendment to the Constitution, which reads: "Neither slavery nor

involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the

party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist in the United States,

or in any place subject to their jurisdiction," empowers Congress to

make laws protecting the civil rights and civil equality of persons

{255} within the "States" against infringement by other _persons_, and

to invest the officers of the United States, both judicial and

executive, with the power to enforce these laws, since in this

Amendment the prohibition of slavery or involuntary servitude is not

directed against "State" action solely, but against any attempt made by

anybody to create an involuntary servitude, it cannot on the other hand

be claimed, with any show of correct interpretation, that the

_Fourteenth_ Amendment warrants the exercise of any such power by the

United States Government, and it is entirely out of the question to

claim that the Fifteenth Amendment protects the right of a person,

within a State, to vote against the attempt of another person or of

other persons to infringe the same, or even against the "State" itself

to do so, except it be on account of race, color or previous condition

of servitude.

[Sidenote: Criticism of the Act.]

There is not the slightest doubt in the mind of any good constitutional

lawyer, at the present time, that Congress overstepped its

constitutional powers in that part of the Enforcement Act of May 31st,

1870, which related to the exercise of the suffrage, and trenched upon

the reserved powers of the "States." The excuse for it was that lawless

bands of white men, the Ku-Klux Klans and the like, were intimidating

the blacks, and in the approaching elections of the autumn of 1870

would prevent them from voting. But that was a matter for the "State"

governments to look out for, and the "State" governments in the South

were, at the time of the passage of this Act, with the exception of

Tennessee, in the hands of the Republicans.

[Sidenote: The corruption in the new "State" governments.]

Meanwhile the new "State" governments had well begun their career of

corruption, shame and vulgarity. They were plundering the treasury,

increasing the taxes, selling franchises, issuing bonds, and

celebrating {256} high carnival everywhere and all the time. The

gentlemen and political leaders of the old school, and the old

political class, of the South looked on aghast, with mingled feelings

of bitter degradation and anger, and the hotspurs and desperadoes were

stirred to deeds of intimidation and violence. There is little doubt

that some negroes were terrified out of exercising the suffrage in the

election of 1870. Not yet, however, had enough of the disqualified

whites been amnestied, or enough intimidation been exercised, or

sufficient unity among the whites been attained, to work the overthrow

of "carpet-bag," negro rule. Enough, however, was threatened to

influence the Republican Congress to proceed to more complete, if not

more extreme, measures for the protection of the negro in his civil and

political rights, and to move the President to garrison the principal

points in the Southern "States" with United States soldiers.

[Sidenote: The supplemental enforcement Act.]

The Congress passed the Act of the 28th of February, 1871, which so

supplemented the Act of May 31st, 1870, as to place the whole control

of the registrations and elections when and where Representatives to

Congress should be chosen, in the hands of United States officers, the

supervisors, and the deputy marshals, commissioners and judges of the

United States courts. It may be claimed that Congress, under the power

to regulate the manner of holding Congressional elections vested in it

by Article I., section 4, of the Constitution, was authorized to pass

this law, provided it confined the action of it to the Congressional

registration and election. But since the "State" elections were held at

the same time and place, and under the same control and direction as

the Congressional, it was inevitable that the control of the United

States officers would be exercised, either directly {257} or

indirectly, over those also. And this was unquestionably the chief

purpose of the Act, so far as its execution in the Southern "States"

was concerned.

[Sidenote: The President's Message of March 23d, 1871.]

But this was not yet enough in the views of the Administration. In the

two years of his incumbency of the Presidential office, General Grant

had fallen into the arms of the radical Republicans, who appeared to be

in large majority, and the usual manoeuvering had begun for the second

term. Upon the basis of information, which turned out to be very

insufficient and unreliable, the President, on the 23d of March, 1871,

addressed a message to Congress, in which he affirmed that life and

property were insecure in some of the "States," and the carrying of the

mails and the collection of the revenue dangerous; that the power to

correct these evils was not possessed by the "State" governments; and

that it was doubtful if the Executive of the United States, under

existing laws, had the power to meet these exigencies; and asked

Congress to pass such laws as would enable him to cope with the

situation.

[Sidenote: The Ku-Klux Act of April 20th, 1871.]

Congress answered this appeal with the noted, not to say notorious,

Ku-Klux Act of April 20th, 1871, in which Congress simply threw to the

winds the constitutional distribution of powers between the "States"

and the United States Government in respect to civil liberty, crime and

punishment, and assumed to legislate freely and without limitation for

the preservation of civil and political rights within the "States," and

for the punishment of the infraction of the same by individual persons

conspiring together for that end, and for the punishment of the

conspiracy alone, whether the infraction or the conspiracy was executed

upon, or directed against, officers of the Government or merely private

persons; and {258} in which the act of a combination of private

individuals defying successfully the constituted authorities of the

United States in a given "State," or those of the "State" concerned,

was declared to be rebellion against the United States, upon the

happening, and during the continuance, of which the President might

suspend the privileges of the writ of Habeas Corpus within such

districts as he, by proclamation, might designate.

[Sidenote: The unconstitutionality of the Act.]

The first part of this Act was, unquestionably, an unconstitutional

encroachment upon the powers of the "States," in so far as it is

related to the protection of political rights against infraction, or

against conspiracy for the purpose of infraction, by private persons.

The second part was probably within the powers of Congress, but it was

a most extreme use of its powers. The "State" governments in the South

were in the hands of the Republican "carpet-baggers" and Republican

negroes, and there is no question that the governors and legislatures

of these "States" were quick enough to call in the aid of United States

troops long before it was necessary to do so. Moreover, the militia of

these "States" was composed almost entirely of negroes, and the whites

were forbidden to keep arms. Under such circumstances this Act of

Congress empowering the President to establish martial law upon his own

motion in time of peace within a "State" when combinations of private

persons had successfully defied, in any instance, the laws of the

"State" was a very stiff measure, and unwarranted by the facts of the

situation.

[Sidenote: Interference of the United States military power in the

affairs of South Carolina.]

As a matter of fact, the Governor of South Carolina had asked the

President to give him United States soldiers for the protection of the

"State" and its citizens against domestic violence, and the President

had, on the 24th of March just preceding the passage of this act,

issued his proclamation commanding the persons {259} composing the

unlawful combinations to disperse and retire to their abodes within

twenty days. This was the method prescribed by the Constitution for

bringing the military power of the United States to the assistance of a

"State" government whenever the "State" government might not be able to

maintain itself against domestic violence. There is no doubt that

General Scott of Ohio, whilom officer in the Union army and in the

Freedmen's Bureau, the "carpet-bag," radical Republican Governor of

South Carolina, attributed the most traitorous character possible to

these combinations, exaggerated the strength and extent of them to the

highest possible degree, and called for United States troops to

suppress them at the earliest possible moment. The most trustworthy men

in South Carolina affirmed then, and have continued to affirm to this

day, that those combinations had no traitorous intent whatsoever, but

were simply defensive in their nature; that the wholesale pardoning of

criminals by the Governor and the vagrancy of the negroes had filled

the country with desperadoes who made life, property, and female honor

insecure; and that, as the militia was composed of the friends of these

fiends, and the "State" government itself would not protect the white

citizens, it was absolutely necessary for the white people to create

some means of united action in self-defence and take the law into their

own hands. Statements to this effect were made by one Judge Carpenter,

a Republican "State" official of South Carolina, before the

investigating committee of Congress in 1871.

[Sidenote: The President's proclamation of May 3d, 1871.]

On the 3d day of May following the passage of the Ku-Klux Act, the

President issued his general proclamation warning the people that the

law applied to the whole country, but particularly exhorting the people

{260} in the newly reconstructed "States" to suppress all unlawful

combinations by their own voluntary efforts, and declaring, that while

he was reluctant to make use of the extraordinary powers conferred on

him by the Act, he would nevertheless do so if it should be found

necessary for securing all the citizens of the United States in "the

peaceful enjoyment of the rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution

and the laws."

[Sidenote: The President's proclamation to the people of South

Carolina.]

On the 12th of the following October, the President directed his

proclamation to the people of South Carolina alone, declaring that

hostile combinations of persons making armed resistance to the civil

authorities of the "State" and the United States, in their attempt to

secure the people in their rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the

United States and the Congressional Act of April 20th, 1871, too strong

to be overcome by these authorities, existed in the counties of York,

Marion, Chester, Laurens, Newberry, Fairfield, Lancaster and

Chesterfield, and commanding the members of these combinations to

deliver their arms and accoutrements into the hands of the United

States officers in those districts, and disperse to their abodes within

five days.

[Sidenote: Suspension of the privileges of the writ of Habeas Corpus by

the President in certain counties of South Carolina.]

At the end of the five days of grace, the President issued a third

proclamation, declaring that the members of these unlawful combinations

in the places mentioned in his former proclamation had not dispersed

and had not delivered up their arms and accoutrements as ordered, and

suspending the privileges of the writ of Habeas Corpus in the counties

of South Carolina above designated.

On the 3d day of the following November a fourth proclamation was

published, in which the President {261} acknowledged his error in

including the county of Marion in the list of counties in which the

privileges of the writ were suspended, but declared that the situation

in Union county was such as to warrant the suspension of those

privileges in that county also, and warned the insurgents in that

county to deliver up their arms and accoutrements and disperse to their

abodes within five days. This warning not having been obeyed, according

to the views of the President, a final proclamation was issued by him

on the 10th day of November suspending the privileges of the writ of

Habeas Corpus in Union county.

[Sidenote: The Ku-Klux trials.]

In execution of the Act of April 20th, and in pursuance of these

proclamations, the President now sent a strong force of United States

troops into the district composed of the nine counties mentioned, the

commanders of which arrested some five or six hundred persons, kept

them in confinement so long as they pleased, and procured the

arraignment of some of them before the United States courts, where a

number of them were convicted and sentenced to fine or imprisonment or

to both. Whether there was any necessity for the exercise of such

harshness as this is a grave question. It was felt at the South to be

an abominable outrage, and the Democrats of the North held the same

opinion. More ominous than all this, however, was the fact that many

leading Republicans raised their voices in disapproval of it, and of

the law which authorized it.

[Sidenote: Corruption in the "State" governments of the South.]

[Sidenote: In South Carolina.]

During the year 1872, in addition to all this, there came to the

knowledge of Congress and of the people of the North the frightful and

scandalous corruption of the "State" governments in the South. It is

very difficult to get at distinct and reliable facts upon a subject

which officials undertake to cover up and keep shrouded in darkness.

{262} But the record of these doings in South Carolina was something as

follows. The House of Representatives, the majority of the members of

which were negroes, and the presiding officer of which was the

notorious F. J. Moses, spent ninety-five thousand dollars to refurnish

its assembly hall, where the aristocrats of South Carolina had never

spent over five thousand. Clocks costing six hundred dollars each,

sofas two hundred dollars each, chairs at sixty dollars each, desks at

a hundred and twenty-five dollars each, mirrors at six hundred dollars

each, cuspidors at eight dollars each--such were the items of the bill.

In the four years from 1868 to 1872, two hundred thousand dollars were

expended for furniture for the legislative chambers alone. Then came

the bills of supplies, sundries and incidentals, amounting in one

session to three hundred and fifty thousand dollars, one hundred and

twenty-five thousand of it for a free restaurant, lunch counter and

bar, at which the members and their friends fared most royally, eating,

drinking and smoking, and paying not a penny therefor directly, nor

indirectly, since many, if not most, of the members of that legislature

paid no stiver of the taxes. Then came the printing bills, averaging

more than one hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year where ten

thousand dollars would have been more than enough to pay every

legitimate expense of that kind.

Then came the sale of franchises of all kinds, and the pledging of the

credit of the "State" in the form of bonds to aid all sorts of

enterprises pretended to be set on foot, or promoted as is now said, by

combinations of legislators or officials or their friends. In 1868 the

"State" debt was about five millions of dollars, with almost enough

assets to pay it. In 1872 the assets had disappeared and the debt was

more than eighteen {263} millions, and nothing worth mentioning to show

for it. And all this when the "State" taxes had been raised from less

than a half million of dollars a year on a valuation of over four

hundred millions to two millions of dollars a year on a valuation of

less than two hundred millions of property.

[Sidenote: In Louisiana.]

In Louisiana, under the leadership of the brilliant young adventurer,

Henry C. Warmoth of Illinois, the financial history of the "State" was

even more scandalous. During the four years of Warmoth's governorship,

from 1868 to 1872, the average annual expenditure of the "State"

government was about six millions of dollars, when, measured by the

previous experiences of the "State," six hundred thousand dollars would

have been ample to defray all legitimate expenses. At the beginning of

Warmoth's administration the debt of the "State" was between six and

seven millions of dollars, with more than enough assets to extinguish

it. At the end of the four years of his power, in 1872, the debt was

nearly fifty millions of dollars, the assets had all disappeared, and

there was nothing worth mentioning to show for the one or the other.

In the counties and municipalities of both "States" the corruption was

equally rampant, shameless, and vulgar. It is impossible to obtain

exact figures in regard to it, or to estimate with any degree of

exactness, or even probability, the amounts stolen and made away with.

In the other reconstructed "States" where the adventurers and the

negroes held sway, the "State" governments worked along the same lines,

though not to the same appalling extent.

It was the most soul-sickening spectacle that Americans had ever been

called upon to behold. Every principle of the old American polity was

here reversed. In place of government by the most intelligent and {264}

virtuous part of the people for the benefit of the governed, here was

government by the most ignorant and vicious part of the population for

the benefit, the vulgar, materialistic, brutal benefit of the governing

set.

[Sidenote: The revolt in the Republican party.]

It is no subject of surprise or wonder that, confronted with these

frightful results of radical Republican policy and administration in

the South, such Republicans as Horace Greeley, Charles Francis Adams,

Lyman Trumbull, David Davis, Carl Schurz, Gratz Brown, Stanley

Matthews, George Hoadly, J. R. Spaulding, George W. Julian, Horace

White, David A. Wells, and the like, turned with disgust from the

nauseating transactions and resolved to do what was in their power to

put an end to it all. Even the radical, but honest, Sumner gave his

adherence to the movement for a change of the Administration, as the

only way to check the terrible corruption which was creeping over the

land. Sumner, it is true, had been made to feel personally the heavy

hand of the Administration. He had been dropped, the preceding year,

from the chairmanship of the Committee on Foreign Relations at the

requirement of the Administration, because he had so strongly and

successfully opposed the Santo Domingo policy of the President and his

"aide-de-camp." But he had opposed that because he saw in it

corruption, robbery and bloodshed.

[Sidenote: The Liberal Republican convention of 1872.]

The Liberal Republicans were bolters, of course, from the regular

organization, and there was no sufficient opportunity for them to

construct a party organization for themselves in time for the

Presidential election of 1872. A general call for the leaders among

them to meet in mass convention was issued from a "State" convention of

Liberal {265} Republicans in Missouri, and the meeting took place at

Cincinnati on the 1st day of May, 1872.

[Sidenote: Their platform.]

The platform which it presented to the people demanded the removal, at

once, of all political disabilities from the white men of the South,

the maintenance of impartial suffrage and of equal civil rights, the

cessation of military rule in the South and the supremacy of civil over

military power, the reform of the civil service, and a speedy return to

specie payments. Many of the Liberal Republicans were inclined toward a

much more moderate tariff policy, but out of respect for the opinions

of those among them who were strong protectionists, they abandoned

their attempt to insert any doctrine on this subject in the platform.

The protectionists were equally considerate, and so the new party went

to the country uncommitted upon this very important question.

[Sidenote: Their nominees.]

It was at first supposed that the choice of the convention for the

Presidency would lay between Judge David Davis of Illinois, Charles

Francis Adams of Massachusetts and Senator Lyman Trumbull of Illinois.

But an unexpected hostility of a very bitter nature soon developed

between the supporters of Davis and Adams, and rendered the nomination

of either of them impossible. This was evident on the first ballot, on

which Mr. Greeley, Senator Trumbull and Gratz Brown each received more

votes than Judge Davis, and together more votes than Mr. Adams. It was

thus manifest that the Western men would not take Mr. Adams and the

Eastern men would not take Judge Davis. The compromise was quickly made

upon Greeley, and Gratz Brown was put with him upon the ticket. It was

an unfortunate selection. The country did not want any brilliant

experiments at the moment. It wanted to settle down to business. And it

was to be {266} foreseen that it would not be willing to make a

newspaper man President at such a juncture.

[Sidenote: Acceptance of the Liberal Republican candidates by the

Democrats.]

But stranger than the fact that the prince of protectionists was now

running for the presidency on a platform which ignored protection, was

the fact that the Democratic party, strengthened again by its Southern

wing, now accepted the platform of the Liberal Republicans, and in

convention at Baltimore, in July following the Cincinnati meeting,

nominated the Liberal Republican candidates for the presidency and the

vice-presidency as its own candidates. The action of the Democrats,

both as to the platform and the candidates, was almost unanimous, and

it would be ungracious to express any suspicion of its sincerity. The

change of profession on the part of the Southern Democrats was very

great indeed, so great as to be surprising, but they had evidently come

to the conclusion that it was useless to contend with the North any

longer against the civil and political rights of the freedmen, and that

it was best for all concerned to accept the inevitable, and try to put

themselves in the most advantageous position possible for adjusting the

relations of their section to it.

[Sidenote: Mr. Greeley and the Democrats.]

Mr. Greeley was, indeed, in strange company, but the company had come

to him. He had not gone to them. He welcomed their support, and became

contaminated by it in the eyes of a vast majority of the people of the

North. His own great ambition to be President also caused him to say

and to do some imprudent and undignified things. More than all, the

time had not yet come for the great change. The country was fast

approaching a financial crisis, and any shock would bring it on with

such sudden violence as to make it widespread and disastrous.

{267} [Sidenote: Division in the Democratic Party.]

As the last move, the "straight-out" Democrats bolted the ticket in

September, and at a convention held in Louisville, Kentucky, nominated

Charles O'Conor of New York for President, and John Quincy Adams of

Massachusetts for Vice-President.

[Sidenote: The Republican platform and nominees.]

The September and October elections in Vermont, Maine, Pennsylvania,

Ohio, and Indiana demonstrated the hopelessness of the opposition to

the radical Republicans. They had held their convention in Philadelphia

in the early part of June, had issued a platform which simply asserted

the righteousness of what they had done and the determination to

persist in the course heretofore followed, and had nominated General

Grant for re-election to the presidency with Senator Henry Wilson, of

Massachusetts, for his running mate.

[Sidenote: The Republican triumph.]

In the election, they swept all of the Northern "States" by heavy

popular majorities, and with their election machinery in the Southern

"States" they captured a majority of these also. In those Southern

"States" which were free from carpet-bag negro rule the Greeley

electors were chosen, that is in Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri,

Tennessee, Georgia and Texas. In the North, a very large number of

Democrats had failed to go to the polls. They could hardly have elected

Greeley, however, had they all voted for him. They were pretty sure of

this, and they took the opportunity of administering a rebuke to their

chiefs for not nominating candidates who were members of their own

party.

[Sidenote: The effect of the triumph of the Republicans.]

While there is no doubt that the re-election of General Grant, and the

election of a strong Republican majority in Congress, quieted the mind

of the North, there is also no doubt that they caused great {268}

discouragement among the white people of the South, since they operated

as an encouragement to the adventurers and the negroes to persevere in

their corrupt and conscienceless management of the "State" governments.

In several of the reconstructed "States" the Democrats had made strong

efforts to secure control of the "State" governments. The Amnesty Act

of May 22d, 1872, had removed the disqualifications of the Fourteenth

Amendment from all the Southern leaders, except such as had been

members of the Thirty-sixth and Thirty-seventh Congresses, or had held

judicial, military, naval, or diplomatic office under the United

States, or had been heads of departments in ministerial office. A large

number of these leaders had thus been placed in a position to

participate as candidates for office and legislative position in the

election, and to aid greatly in the work of rescuing their "States"

from negro Republican rule. In Alabama and Louisiana they had very

nearly succeeded. In Alabama they had elected the Governor and a

majority of the members to the lower house of the legislature in the

autumn of 1870, and in 1872 they claimed to have elected a majority of

the members to both houses.

[Sidenote: Events in Alabama.]

In Alabama, the Democratic members-elect of the legislature convened in

the capitol, and the Republican members-elect in the court-house. The

Democratic Governor, Lindsay, recognized the Democratic legislature,

and the Democratic legislature then canvassed the votes for Governor

and declared the Republican candidate, D. P. Lewis, elected. Lewis then

recognized the Republican legislature, and telegraphed to Opelika for

United States soldiers to come to Montgomery. They arrived by the next

train, and, backed by these, the Governor and his friends, in and {269}

out of the legislature, succeeded in constituting a legislature with a

small Republican majority in both houses; and the whites fell back

again under black rule, discouraged and exhausted by the exertions and

the failure to escape from it.

[Sidenote: Events in Louisiana.]

In Louisiana the events were far more extraordinary and violent.

Warmoth's rule was approaching its end, and his Republican enemies,

what was known as the Custom House faction, the United States

officials, were fairly panting to get at him. To foil them, he went

over to the Democrats and promised to give them a fair chance to elect

their candidate for Governor and their candidates for the legislature.

For this he expected protection from them against the Custom House

gang, to whom he had denied what they had conceived to be their proper

share of the public plunder, and who, if in possession of the "State"

government, would make him answer for it. Warmoth supposed he was able

with his election machinery to give the "State" to the Democrats

whether the voters should do so or not. The election took place at the

same time as the presidential election, November 4th, 1872. The returns

were sent by the supervisors and commissioners of elections to Warmoth,

and he delivered them to his Returning Board, consisting of himself,

the Secretary of State, F. J. Herron, and one John Lynch; the other two

members of the Board as constituted by the legislature, by the act of

1870, viz., Lieutenant-Governor Pinchback and one Anderson, being

disqualified from serving, since both of them were candidates for

office at this election. The Governor had his suspicions aroused about

the loyalty of both Herron and Lynch to him before the count took

place, and having the legal power to remove Herron, he did so at once

and appointed one John Wharton, a friend upon whom he could rely, in

{270} Herron's place. Lynch now refused to act with them, and Herron

denied the power of the Governor to dismiss him from the Secretaryship

of State, and from his _ex officio_ membership in the Returning Board.

Warmoth and Wharton proceeded, however, to supply the place of Lynch,

as they might do under the law, and Herron and Lynch proceeded to

supply the place of Warmoth.

The Warmoth Board had the returns, and it was also generally felt that

the Democratic candidate for Governor, John McEnery, had been chosen by

the voters. Moreover, the right of Herron to retain the office of

Secretary of State was immediately brought before the supreme court of

the "State," and the court gave its decision against Herron's

contention. It seemed now certain that the Warmoth Returning Board

would declare McEnery to have been elected Governor. But the Republican

candidate, W. P. Kellogg, then a Senator from Louisiana in Congress,

was watchful and resourceful. He secured from United States District

Judge Durell an injunction which forbade the Warmoth Board to do

anything except in the presence of the Lynch Board, and forbade McEnery

from claiming his election under the returns which might be given out

by the Warmoth Board.

[Sidenote: Warmoth and Durell.]

Warmoth met this by a move which was equally a _coup de surprise_. The

legislature had at its last session passed a law vesting the power to

select the members of the Returning Board in the senate. The Governor

had not signed this bill, and probably never intended to sign it, since

it proposed to take the control of the Board out of his hands, but it

now seemed to furnish him a way of escape from Durell's order. He

hastily signed the bill and promulgated it as law, and as the senate

was not in session, proceeded to appoint the members of the new Board

himself, under the power of the Governor to make temporary appointments

{271} to office when the senate was not in session. He appointed one

Dr. Feriet chairman of the Board, and put the election returns in his

hands. This Board declared that McEnery had been elected Governor and

that the Greeley electors had been chosen. The Governor published these

decisions officially on the 5th day of December, and the affair seemed

to have been closed. But to the surprise of everyone concerned, and of

the whole country, in the middle of the night following, Judge Durell

issued an order to the United States Marshal, S. B. Packard, to take

possession of the capitol and hold it at the pleasure of the Judge

against all unlawful bodies attempting to convene therein. The Judge

claimed that Warmoth had committed a contempt against his court in the

Returning Board proceeding, and he declared that the Lynch Board was

the legal body. His order furthermore required the commander of the

United States troops to furnish a detachment of soldiers to sustain the

United States marshal in taking possession of the capitol, and in

enforcing the Lynch Board's canvass and decision.

A more palpable outrage upon the lawful powers of a "State" could

hardly have been conceived. The Judge had not a scintilla of authority

upon which to rest his proceeding. It is claimed that he was drunk when

he made the order. But this can hardly have been true, that is he could

not have been any more than ordinarily drunk, since the order was not

withdrawn when he became ostensibly sober again, but was made the basis

of a proceeding which lasted through many days, and the results of

which were the counting in of Kellogg and of a Republican legislature

by the Lynch Board, the immediate instalment of the Lynch Board

legislature, the almost immediate impeachment of Warmoth by it and his

removal from the governorship, the installation of the {272}

Lieutenant-Governor, the negro Pinchback, in his seat, the recognition

of the Lynch Board legislature and of Pinchback by the President of the

United States as the lawful legislature and executive of Louisiana, and

the inauguration of Kellogg as Governor at the end of the

Warmoth-Pinchback term. If this was all the work of a drunken spree, it

must have been a very long one, and there must have been many

participants in it besides the Judge.

The Warmoth Board Governor and legislature undertook to set up

government also, sustained as they undoubtedly were both by the law,

and by public opinion in Louisiana and probably throughout the country,

and partially organized a militia force. It was the fighting between

this militia and the metropolitan police in the streets of New Orleans

which occasioned the suppression of the McEnery government at last by

United States soldiers.

[Sidenote: The downward course between 1872 and 1874.]

[Sidenote: The elections of 1874.]

For two years more now the government of the adventurers, based on

negro support, continued in the "States" south of the Tennessee line,

except Georgia. Property was decreasing in amount and value; taxes were

being doubled; and new bond issues were being made, and the bonds sold

at a great reduction upon their face value, or stolen outright. But the

day of deliverance was coming. The conscience of the Nation had been

aroused, and in the elections of 1874 the voters throughout the country

delivered a stunning rebuke to the party responsible for the hideous

situation in the South. It is true that other issues were influential

in producing the _bouleversement_ of 1874, especially the financial

panic of 1873 and the corruption in the circles of the Federal

Administration itself, the Whiskey ring frauds, and the Indian agent

peculations. We must also {273} remember that at this very election

several of the Southern "States" relieved themselves of Republican rule

and sent solid, or almost solid, Democratic delegations to Congress.

But with all proper allowance for the effect of these things, there

still remained, as the chief cause of the change of view in the North,

the revolt of the popular conscience against being any longer dragooned

into the support of the policy of the Republican party in the Southern

"States," and the popular disgust at the everlasting "waving of the

bloody shirt" whenever the dominance of that party seemed anywhere

threatened. At any rate, it was a clean sweep, and from a majority of

two-thirds in the Forty-third Congress, the Republicans found

themselves in possession of only about one-third of the seats in the

Lower House of the Forty-fourth Congress.

[Sidenote: The change in Alabama, Arkansas and Texas.]

Moreover, three more of the Southern "States" freed themselves, at this

time, from "Black Republican" rule. In Alabama, the respectable whites

had now about all gone into the Democratic ranks, and with the election

of George S. Houston as Governor, and a legislature in large majority

Democratic, the "State" won at last its self-government. Likewise by a

similar fusion of all the respectable whites into the Democratic party,

A. H. Garland was elected Governor of Arkansas and a legislature with a

large Democratic majority was chosen, and from that time forward the

"State" government has been in the hands of its own citizens. The same

result was reached in Texas, where the union of the respectables of all

parties upon the Democratic candidates elected Richard Coke Governor

and a legislature of reputable white men.

[Sidenote: The status in South Carolina in 1874.]

[Sidenote: Governor Chamberlain.]

Even South Carolina very nearly escaped her thraldom, and came near to

electing a white Democrat Governor. As it was, she got a moderate

Republican for {274} Governor, Mr. D. H. Chamberlain, a Northerner

indeed, but a man of great ability and undoubted honesty, who did

everything in his power to redeem the "State" from the miserable

condition into which the errors and crimes of his predecessors had

brought it. He naturally soon found himself in conflict with some of

the leaders of his own party in the "State" and at Washington, and was

greatly impeded by them in carrying out his own purposes. At last, in

1875, the break between him and the members of his party in the

legislature was completed by the act of the legislature in electing the

notorious F. J. Moses, Jr., and the negro, W. J. Whipper, "State"

judges. The Governor was so incensed at this act of downright depravity

that he refused to commission the two judges-elect to the judicial

offices to which they had been chosen. Whipper threatened to use force

to gain possession of the office, and the Governor issued his

proclamation threatening to arrest every person who should give Whipper

any aid or support in this attempt as disturbers of the public peace.

The Governor triumphed and protected the "State" against the terrible

degradation which impended over it, but his brave attitude ruined him

with the radical and base elements of his party.

[Sidenote: The day of complete deliverance.]

[Sidenote: The status in Mississippi in 1875.]

The day of complete deliverance was now, however, rapidly approaching.

The election of 1875 in Mississippi showed that the domination of the

"Black Republicans" in the Southern "State" governments could last no

longer. Here was a "State" in which the negro population exceeded the

white very largely, but in the election of 1875 the whites finally got

together and what they could not accomplish in one way they did in

another. The whites organized themselves into rifle clubs, attended the

Republican {275} meetings and insisted upon a division of the time

between their own speakers and the Republican speakers at these

meetings. A great deal of fraud and intimidation was practised, and

some violence was exercised, but always in such a manner as not to

provoke the calling of United States troops to the scene. The immediate

occasion of these desperate movements on the part of the whites was the

treatment accorded the petition made by the taxpayers' convention of

the "State" to the legislature for relief from the intolerable burdens

under which the taxpayers were suffering. This petition of the 4th of

January, 1875, recited that between the years 1869 and 1874 the rate of

"State" taxation had been raised from ten cents on the hundred dollars

of assessed value of lands to one dollar and forty cents, and that in

many cases the increase in the rate of the county levies had been even

greater, so that the whole product of the soil was hardly sufficient to

pay the taxes. The negro legislature laughed at these representations,

and did not deign to consider them, much less to do anything to satisfy

the frightful grievances complained of. It was now a choice between

complete destruction and the employment of any means necessary to

escape from it. There was no use in talking about observing the letter

of the law at such a moment. The law was iniquitous and it was rapidly

destroying all that was left of prosperity, civilization, morality and

decency. If it would not yield, it had to be broken. The movement was

successful. It was really a revolution. It resulted in the election of

a Democratic legislature in November of 1875, the disruption of the

Republican party in the "State," the framing of an impeachment against

the Republican Governor, Ames, his resignation and departure from the

"State," and the accession of the {276} Democrat, John M. Stone, to the

gubernatorial office.

It was thus that the eventful year 1876 was introduced, and it was an

earnest of the relief which was now to come to the remaining "States"

of the South suffering under the rule of the adventurers and their

negro allies.

[Sidenote: Fiat money and the resumption of specie payments.]

While the Republican party had step by step, and almost unconsciously,

involved itself in the support of dishonest and oppressive government

at the South, it was, on the other hand, fighting the battle for

financial honesty in the Nation at large against the fiat money heresy

and the schemes of repudiation invented and supported by the national

Democracy. Its Congressional majority had passed the Refunding Acts of

July 14th, 1870, and January 20th, 1871, for refunding the debt of the

United States in coin bonds bearing five, four and one-half and four

per centum interest. These acts authorized the issue of eighteen

hundred millions of dollars in these new bonds, five hundred millions

payable after ten years, and bearing five per centum interest, three

hundred millions payable after fifteen years and bearing four and

one-half per centum interest, and one thousand millions payable after

thirty years and bearing four per centum interest. By the Act of March

18th, 1869, the Republican Congress had declared that all of the

obligations of the United States should be paid in coin or its

equivalent, unless otherwise specifically stipulated in the law

authorizing the obligation. This Act was made applicable to past, as

well as future, obligations. It rested on the principle that debts must

be paid in the best money of the country unless otherwise agreed to in

the contract. This is, of course, the sound principle both of morals

and finance, and no act of Congress pronouncing {277} it would have

been considered necessary, except for the great fact that the

Democratic party, in its campaign of 1868, had espoused the opposite

doctrine and had fought the campaign largely under that issue. The Act,

however, might of course be repealed, and in that case the question as

to whether the principal sum of the greater part of the national

indebtedness should be paid in coin would be again opened, since the

laws authorizing the incurring of these obligations provided only for

the payment of the interest upon them in coin. It was in order to

forestall the possibility of a repeal of the Act of March 18th, 1869,

as well as in order to make a large saving in the interest charge, that

these Refunding Acts were passed.

After the panic of 1873 had resulted in such a depression of business

and depreciation of values throughout the country as to create greater

discontent with the existing political management, and this discontent

had manifested itself so distinctly in the elections of 1874,

announcing to the Republican party that after March 5th, 1875, a

Democratic majority would prevail in the House of Representatives, it

was manifest to the Republican leaders, in Congress and out of

Congress, that if anything was to be done in regard to the resumption

of specie payment, anything for bringing the paper currency of the

United States up to a coin value, it must be done speedily, and on the

21st of December, 1874, Mr. Sherman reported a bill from the Finance

Committee to the Senate for this purpose, which became a law on the

14th day of January following, and which provided for the redemption of

the fractional currency with silver coins of the value of ten,

twenty-five and fifty cents, so rapidly as these coins could be minted;

abolished the charge of one-fifth of one per centum on the coinage of

gold, making the coinage of gold at the mints of the {278} United

States free; repealed the law limiting the aggregate amount of the

circulating notes of the national banking associations, and the law for

the withdrawal of national-bank currency from, and its redistribution

among, the several "States" and Territories; ordered the Secretary of

the Treasury in issuing new circulating notes to the national banking

associations to retire United States legal tender notes to the amount

of eighty per centum of such issues, until the United States legal

tender notes should be reduced to three hundred millions of dollars,

and after January 1st, 1879, to redeem these legal tender notes in coin

on their presentation at the office of the Assistant Treasurer of the

United States in the city of New York, in sums of not less than fifty

dollars; and, to enable the Secretary of the Treasury to do this,

authorized him to use any unappropriated surplus revenue which might

be, from time to time, in the Treasury, and to sell bonds of the

description mentioned in the Act of July 14th, 1870, in such amounts as

he should find necessary to accomplish the purpose.

[Sidenote: The inflation bill of 1874 and the veto of it by the

President.]

It is true that the Republican majority in Congress had not taken this

high ground concerning the public credit and sound money without some

wavering. The President himself had become frightened by the panic of

the autumn of 1873, and in his annual message of December 1st following

had made recommendations that might be regarded as favorable to an

inflation of the existing body of paper money. His party friends in

Congress very soon produced a bill which, among other things, provided

for the increase of the United States notes and the national bank notes

to the extent of about one hundred millions of dollars, and passed it.

But the President had either thought the question out more fully, or

had been in receipt of some very sound {279} advice, after he wrote the

message of December 1st, 1873. On the 22d of April, 1874, he sent a

special message to Congress vetoing the bill. This stand of the

President recalled the Republicans in Congress from their economic

aberrations, and set them again upon the course which led to the Act of

the 14th of January, 1875.

While at the moment this law for the resumption of specie payments in

the short period of four years, or rather less, from the time of its

enactment seemed a rather hazardous, not to say desperate, move on the

part of the Republicans, it soon became manifest that they could have

done nothing so calculated to strengthen the hold of the party upon the

solid and conservative men of the country as just this very thing. Many

of these men who had usually voted with the Republicans disapproved of

the Southern policy of the party, and were on the point of turning

against it. With the Resumption Act the financial policy of the

Republican party, and of the country, was dragged to the front, and the

Southern policy was forced backward, and made to constitute a less

prominent issue in the campaign of 1876. This was not only wise party

management, but it was also a fortunate thing for the entire country.

The country was not yet in a position to endure a Democratic

administration, and, on the other hand, it was surfeited with

reconstruction Republican administrations. It wanted a sound money

Republican administration, which would devote itself to the development

of the economic interests of the whole people, and would let the

"State" governments in the South have a chance to work out their own

salvation. And this was just what it got in the election of 1876, and

in the administration of President Rutherford B. Hayes.

{280}

Reconstruction and the Constitution, 1866-1876 · 第 12 / 14 章