But his fortune was overwhelmed in the shipwreck of the year

Produced by P. J. Riddick

MEMOIRS OF MY LIFE AND WRITINGS

By Edward Gibbon

In the fifty-second year of my age, after the completion of an

arduous and successful work, I now propose to employ some moments of

my leisure in reviewing the simple transactions of a private and

literary life. Truth, naked unblushing truth, the first virtue of

more serious history, must be the sole recommendation of this

personal narrative. The style shall be simple and familiar; but

style is the image of character; and the habits of correct writing

may produce, without labour or design, the appearance of art and

study. My own amusement is my motive, and will be my reward: and if

these sheets are communicated to some discreet and indulgent

friends, they will be secreted from the public eye till the author

shall be removed beyond the reach of criticism or ridicule.

A lively desire of knowing and of recording our ancestors so

generally prevails, that it must depend on the influence of some

common principle in the minds of men. We seem to have lived in the

persons of our forefathers; it is the labour and reward of vanity to

extend the term of this ideal longevity. Our imagination is always

active to enlarge the narrow circle in which Nature has confined us.

Fifty or an hundred years may be allotted to an individual, but we

step forward beyond death with such hopes as religion and philosophy

will suggest; and we fill up the silent vacancy that precedes our

birth, by associating ourselves to the authors of our existence.

Our calmer judgment will rather tend to moderate, than to suppress,

the pride of an ancient and worthy race. The satirist may laugh,

the philosopher may preach; but Reason herself will respect the

prejudices and habits, which have been consecrated by the experience

of mankind.

Wherever the distinction of birth is allowed to form a superior

order in the state, education and example should always, and will

often, produce among them a dignity of sentiment and propriety of

conduct, which is guarded from dishonour by their own and the public

esteem. If we read of some illustrious line so ancient that it has

no beginning, so worthy that it ought to have no end, we sympathize

in its various fortunes; nor can we blame the generous enthusiasm,

or even the harmless vanity, of those who are allied to the honours

of its name. For my own part, could I draw my pedigree from a

general, a statesman, or a celebrated author, I should study their

lives with the diligence of filial love. In the investigation of

past events, our curiosity is stimulated by the immediate or

indirect reference to ourselves; but in the estimate of honour we

should learn to value the gifts of Nature above those of Fortune; to

esteem in our ancestors the qualities that best promote the

interests of society; and to pronounce the descendant of a king less

truly noble than the offspring of a man of genius, whose writings

will instruct or delight the latest posterity. The family of

Confucius is, in my opinion, the most illustrious in the world.

After a painful ascent of eight or ten centuries, our barons and

princes of Europe are lost in the darkness of the middle ages; but,

in the vast equality of the empire of China, the posterity of

Confucius have maintained, above two thousand two hundred years,

their peaceful honours and perpetual succession. The chief of the

family is still revered, by the sovereign and the people, as the

lively image of the wisest of mankind. The nobility of the Spencers

has been illustrated and enriched by the trophies of Marlborough;

but I exhort them to consider the "Fairy Queen" as the most precious

jewel of their coronet. I have exposed my private feelings, as I

shall always do, without scruple or reserve. That these sentiments

are just, or at least natural, I am inclined to believe, since I do

not feel myself interested in the cause; for I can derive from my

ancestors neither glory nor shame.

Yet a sincere and simple narrative of my own life may amuse some of

my leisure hours; but it will subject me, and perhaps with justice,

to the imputation of vanity. I may judge, however, from the

experience both of past and of the present times, that the public

are always curious to know the men, who have left behind them any

image of their minds: the most scanty accounts of such men are

compiled with diligence, and perused with eagerness; and the student

of every class may derive a lesson, or an example, from the lives

most similar to his own. My name may hereafter be placed among the

thousand articles of a Biographic Britannica; and I must be

conscious, that no one is so well qualified, as myself, to describe

the series of my thoughts and actions. The authority of my masters,

of the grave Thuanus, and the philosophic Hume, might be sufficient

to justify my design; but it would not be difficult to produce a

long list of ancients and moderns, who, in various forms, have

exhibited their own portraits. Such portraits are often the most

interesting, and sometimes the only interesting parts of their

writings; and if they be sincere, we seldom complain of the

minuteness or prolixity of these personal memorials. The lives of

the younger Pliny, of Petrarch, and of Erasmus, are expressed in the

epistles, which they themselves have given to the world. The essays

of Montaigne and Sir William Temple bring us home to the houses and

bosoms of the authors: we smile without contempt at the headstrong

passions of Benevenuto Cellini, and the gay follies of Colley

Cibber. The confessions of St. Austin and Rousseau disclose the

secrets of the human heart; the commentaries of the learned Huet

have survived his evangelical demonstration; and the memoirs of

Goldoni are more truly dramatic than his Italian comedies. The

heretic and the churchman are strongly marked in the characters and

fortunes of Whiston and Bishop Newton; and even the dullness of

Michael de Marolles and Anthony Wood acquires some value from the

faithful representation of men and manners. That I am equal or

superior to some of these, the effects of modesty or affectation

cannot force me to dissemble.

My family is originally derived from the county of Kent. The

Southern district, which borders on Sussex and the sea, was formerly

overspread with the great forest Anderida, and even now retains the

denomination of the Weald or Woodland. In this district, and in the

hundred and parish of Rolvenden, the Gibbons were possessed of lands

in the year one thousand three hundred and twenty-six; and the elder

branch of the family, without much increase or diminution of

property, still adheres to its native soil. Fourteen years after

the first appearance of his name, John Gibbon is recorded as the

Marmorarius or architect of King Edward the Third: the strong and

stately castle of Queensborough, which guarded the entrance of the

Medway, was a monument of his skill; and the grant of an hereditary

toll on the passage from Sandwich to Stonar, in the Isle of Thanet,

is the reward of no vulgar artist. In the visitations of the

heralds, the Gibbons are frequently mentioned; they held the rank of

esquire in an age, when that title was less promiscuously assumed:

one of them, under the reign of Queen Elizabeth, was captain of the

militia of Kent; and a free school, in the neighbouring town of

Benenden, proclaims the charity and opulence of its founder. But

time, or their own obscurity, has cast a veil of oblivion over the

virtues and vices of my Kentish ancestors; their character or

station confined them to the labours and pleasures of a rural life:

nor is it in my power to follow the advice of the poet, in an

inquiry after a name,--

"Go! search it there, where to be born, and die,

Of rich and poor makes all the history."

So recent is the institution of our parish registers. In the

beginning of the seventeenth century, a younger branch of the

Gibbons of Rolvenden migrated from the country to the city; and from

this branch I do not blush to descend. The law requires some

abilities; the church imposes some restraints; and before our army

and navy, our civil establishments, and India empire, had opened so

many paths of fortune, the mercantile profession was more frequently

chosen by youths of a liberal race and education, who aspired to

create their own independence. Our most respectable families have

not disdained the counting-house, or even the shop; their names are

enrolled in the Livery and Companies of London; and in England, as

well as in the Italian commonwealths, heralds have been compelled to

declare that gentility is not degraded by the exercise of trade.

The armorial ensigns which, in the times of chivalry, adorned the

crest and shield of the soldier, are now become an empty decoration,

which every man, who has money to build a carriage, may paint

according to his fancy on the panels. My family arms are the same,

which were borne by the Gibbons of Kent in an age, when the College

of Heralds religiously guarded the distinctions of blood and name: a

lion rampant gardant, between three schallop-shells argent, on a

field azure. I should not however have been tempted to blazon my

coat of arms, were it not connected with a whimsical anecdote. About

the reign of James the First, the three harmless schallop-shells

were changed by Edmund Gibbon esq. into three ogresses, or female

cannibals, with a design of stigmatizing three ladies, his

kinswomen, who had provoked him by an unjust law-suit. But this

singular mode of revenge, for which he obtained the sanction of Sir

William Seagar, king at arms, soon expired with its author; and, on

his own monument in the Temple church, the monsters vanish, and the

three schallop-shells resume their proper and hereditary place.

Our alliances by marriage it is not disgraceful to mention. The

chief honour of my ancestry is James Fiens, Baron Say and Scale, and

Lord High Treasurer of England, in the reign of Henry the Sixth;

from whom by the Phelips, the Whetnalls, and the Cromers, I am

lineally descended in the eleventh degree. His dismission and

imprisonment in the Tower were insufficient to appease the popular

clamour; and the Treasurer, with his son-in-law Cromer, was

beheaded(1450), after a mock trial by the Kentish insurgents. The

black list of his offences, as it is exhibited in Shakespeare,

displays the ignorance and envy of a plebeian tyrant. Besides the

vague reproaches of selling Maine and Normandy to the Dauphin, the

Treasurer is specially accused of luxury, for riding on a

foot-cloth; and of treason, for speaking French, the language of our

enemies: "Thou hast most traitorously corrupted the youth of the

realm," says Jack Cade to the unfortunate Lord, "in erecting a

grammar-school; and whereas before our forefathers had no other

books than the score and the tally, thou hast caused printing to be

used; and, contrary to the king, his crown, and dignity, thou hast

built a paper-mill. It will be proved to thy face, that thou hast

men about thee, who usually talk of a noun and a verb, and such

abominable words, as no Christian ear can endure to hear." Our

dramatic poet is generally more attentive to character than to

history; and I much fear that the art of printing was not introduced

into England, till several years after Lord Say's death; but of some

of these meritorious crimes I should hope to find my ancestor

guilty; and a man of letters may be proud of his descent from a

patron and martyr of learning.

In the beginning of the last century Robert Gibbon Esq. of Rolvenden

in Kent (who died in 1618), had a son of the same name of Robert,

who settled in London, and became a member of the Cloth-workers'

Company. His wife was a daughter of the Edgars, who flourished

about four hundred years in the county of Suffolk, and produced an

eminent and wealthy serjeant-at-law, Sir Gregory Edgar, in the reign

of Henry the Seventh. Of the sons of Robert Gibbon, (who died in

1643,) Matthew did not aspire above the station of a linen-draper in

Leadenhall-street; but John has given to the public some curious

memorials of his existence, his character, and his family. He was

born on Nov. 3d, 1629; his education was liberal, at a grammar-school,

and afterwards in Jesus College at Cambridge; and he

celebrates the retired content which he enjoyed at Allesborough, in

Worcestershire, in the house of Thomas Lord Coventry, where John

Gibbon was employed as a domestic tutor, the same office which Mr.

Hobbes exercised in the Devonshire family. But the spirit of my

kinsman soon immerged into more active life: he visited foreign

countries as a soldier and a traveller, acquired the knowledge of

the French and Spanish languages, passed some time in the Isle of

Jersey, crossed the Atlantic, and resided upwards of a twelvemonth

(1659) in the rising colony of Virginia. In this remote province

his taste, or rather passion, for heraldry found a singular

gratification at a war-dance of the native Indians. As they moved

in measured steps, brandishing their tomahawks, his curious eye

contemplated their little shields of bark, and their naked bodies,

which were painted with the colours and symbols of his favourite

science. "At which I exceedingly wondered; and concluded that

heraldry was ingrafted _naturally_ into the sense of human race. If

so, it deserves a greater esteem than now-a-days is put upon it."

His return to England after the Restoration was soon followed by his

marriage his settlement in a house in St. Catherine's Cloister, near

the Tower, which devolved to my grandfather and his introduction

into the Heralds' College (in 1671) by the style and title of

Blue-mantle Pursuivant at Arms. In this office he enjoyed near

fifty years the rare felicity of uniting, in the same pursuit, his

duty and inclination: his name is remembered in the College, and

many of his letters are still preserved. Several of the most

respectable characters of the age, Sir William Dugdale, Mr. Ashmole,

Dr. John Betts, and Dr. Nehemiah Grew, were his friends; and in the

society of such men, John Gibbon may be recorded without disgrace as

the member of an astrological club. The study of hereditary honours

is favourable to the Royal prerogative; and my kinsman, like most of

his family, was a high Tory both in church and state. In the latter

end of the reign of Charles the Second, his pen was exercised in the

cause of the Duke of York: the Republican faction he most cordially

detested; and as each animal is conscious of its proper arms, the

heralds' revenge was emblazoned on a most diabolical escutcheon.

But the triumph of the Whig government checked the preferment of

Blue-mantle; and he was even suspended from his office, till his

tongue could learn to pronounce the oath of abjuration. His life

was prolonged to the age of ninety: and, in the expectation of the

inevitable though uncertain hour, he wishes to preserve the

blessings of health, competence, and virtue. In the year 1682 he

published in London his Introductio ad Latinam Blasoniam, an

original attempt, which Camden had desiderated, to define, in a

Roman idiom, the terms and attributes of a Gothic institution. It

is not two years since I acquired, in a foreign land, some domestic

intelligence of my own family; and this intelligence was conveyed to

Switzerland from the heart of Germany. I had formed an acquaintance

with Mr. Langer, a lively and ingenious scholar, while he resided at

Lausanne as preceptor to the Hereditary Prince of Brunswick. On his

return to his proper station of Librarian to the Ducal Library of

Wolfenbuttel, he accidentally found among some literary rubbish a

small old English volume of heraldry, inscribed with the name of

John Gibbon. From the title only Mr. Langer judged that it might be

an acceptable present to his friend--and he judged rightly. His

manner is quaint and affected; his order is confused: but he

displays some wit, more reading, and still more enthusiasm: and if

an enthusiast be often absurd, he is never languid. An English text

is perpetually interspersed with Latin sentences in prose and verse;

but in his own poetry he claims an exemption from the laws of

prosody. Amidst a profusion of genealogical knowledge, my kinsman

could not be forgetful of his own name; and to him I am indebted for

almost the whole of my information concerning the Gibbon family.

From this small work the author expected immortal fame.

Such are the hopes of authors! In the failure of those hopes John

Gibbon has not been the first of his profession, and very possibly

may not be the last of his name. His brother Matthew Gibbon, the

draper, had one daughter and two sons--my grandfather Edward, who

was born in the year 1666, and Thomas, afterwards Dean of Carlisle.

According to the mercantile creed, that the best book is a

profitable ledger, the writings of John the herald would be much

less precious than those of his nephew Edward: but an author

professes at least to write for the public benefit; and the slow

balance of trade can be pleasing to those persons only, to whom it

is advantageous. The successful industry of my grandfather raised

him above the level of his immediate ancestors; he appears to have

launched into various and extensive dealings: even his opinions were

subordinate to his interest; and I find him in Flanders clothing

King William's troops, while he would have contracted with more

pleasure, though not perhaps at a cheaper rate, for the service of

King James. During his residence abroad, his concerns at home were

managed by his mother Hester, an active and notable woman. Her

second husband was a widower of the name of Acton: they united the

children of their first nuptials. After his marriage with the

daughter of Richard Acton, goldsmith in Leadenhall-street, he gave

his own sister to Sir Whitmore Acton, of Aldenham; and I am thus

connected, by a triple alliance, with that ancient and loyal family

of Shropshire baronets. It consisted about that time of seven

brothers, all of gigantic stature; one of whom, a pigmy of six feet

two inches, confessed himself the last and least of the seven;

adding, in the true spirit of party, that such men were not born

since the Revolution. Under the Tory administration of the four

last years of Queen Anne (1710-1714) Mr. Edward Gibbon was appointed

one of the Commissioners of the Customs; he sat at that Board with

Prior; but the merchant was better qualified for his station than

the poet; since Lord Bolingbroke has been heard to declare, that he

had never conversed with a man, who more clearly understood the

commerce and finances of England. In the year 1716 he was elected

one of the Directors of the South Sea Company; and his books

exhibited the proof that, before his acceptance of this fatal

office, he had acquired an independent fortune of sixty thousand

pounds.

But his fortune was overwhelmed in the shipwreck of the year twenty,

and the labours of thirty years were blasted in a single day. Of

the use or abuse of the South Sea scheme, of the guilt or innocence

of my grandfather and his brother Directors, I am neither a

competent nor a disinterested judge. Yet the equity of modern times

must condemn the violent and arbitrary proceedings, which would have

disgraced the cause of justice, and would render injustice still

more odious. No sooner had the nation awakened from its golden

dream, than a popular and even a parliamentary clamour demanded

their victims: but it was acknowledged on all sides that the South

Sea Directors, however guilty, could not be touched by any known

laws of the land. The speech of Lord Molesworth, the author of the

State of Denmark, may shew the temper, or rather the intemperance,

of the House of Commons. "Extraordinary crimes (exclaimed that

ardent Whig) call aloud for extraordinary remedies. The Roman

lawgivers had not foreseen the possible existence of a parricide;

but as soon as the first monster appeared, he was sewn in a sack,

and cast headlong into the river; and I shall be content to inflict

the same treatment on the authors of our present ruin." His motion

was not literally adopted; but a bill of pains and penalties was

introduced, a retroactive statute, to punish the offences, which did

not exist at the time they were committed. Such a pernicious

violation of liberty and law can be excused only by the most

imperious necessity; nor could it be defended on this occasion by

the plea of impending danger or useful example. The legislature

restrained the persons of the Directors, imposed an exorbitant

security for their appearance, and marked their characters with a

previous note of ignominy: they were compelled to deliver, upon

oath, the strict value of their estates; and were disabled from

making any transfer or alienation of any part of their property.

Against a bill of pains and penalties it is the common right of

every subject to be heard by his counsel at the bar: they prayed to

be heard; their prayer was refused; and their oppressors, who

required no evidence, would listen to no defence. It had been at

first proposed that one-eighth of their respective estates should be

allowed for the future support of the Directors; but it was

speciously urged, that in the various shades of opulence and guilt

such an unequal proportion would be too light for many, and for some

might possibly be too heavy. The character and conduct of each man

were separately weighed; but, instead of the calm solemnity of a

judicial inquiry, the fortune and honour of three and thirty

Englishmen were made the topic of hasty conversation, the sport of a

lawless majority; and the basest member of the committee, by a

malicious word or, a silent vote, might indulge his general spleen

or personal animosity. Injury was aggravated by insult, and insult

was embittered by pleasantry. Allowances of twenty pounds, or one

shilling, were facetiously moved. A vague report that a Director

had formerly been concerned in another project, by which some

unknown persons had lost their money, was admitted as a proof of his

actual guilt. One man was ruined because he had dropped a foolish

speech, that his horses should feed upon gold; another because he

was grown so proud, that, one day at the Treasury, he had refused a

civil answer to persons much above him. All were condemned, absent

and unheard, in arbitrary fines and forfeitures, which swept away

the greatest part of their substance. Such bold oppression can

scarcely be shielded by the omnipotence of parliament; and yet it

maybe seriously questioned, whether the judges of the South Sea

Directors were the true and legal representatives of their country.

The first parliament of George the First had been chosen (1715) for

three years: the term had elapsed, their trust was expired; and the

four additional years (1718-1722), during which they continued to

sit, were derived not from the people, but from themselves; from the

strong measure of the septennial bill, which can only be paralleled

by il serar di consiglio of the Venetian history. Yet candour will

own that to the same parliament every Englishman is deeply indebted:

the septennial act, so vicious in its origin, has been sanctioned by

time, experience, and the national consent. Its first operation

secured the House of Hanover on the throne, and its permanent

influence maintains the peace and stability of government. As often

as a repeal has been moved in the House of Commons, I have given in

its defence a clear and conscientious vote. My grandfather could

not expect to be treated with more lenity than his companions. His

Tory principles and connections rendered him obnoxious to the ruling

powers: his name is reported in a suspicious secret; and his

well-known abilities could not plead the excuse of ignorance or

error. In the first proceedings against the South Sea Directors,

Mr. Gibbon is one of the few who were taken into custody; and, in

the final sentence, the measure of his fine proclaims him eminently

guilty. The total estimate which he delivered on oath to the House

of Commons amounted to 106,543 pounds 5 shillings and 6 pence,

exclusive of antecedent settlements. Two different allowances of

15,000 pounds and of 10,000 pounds were moved for Mr. Gibbon; but,

on the question being put, it was carried without a division for the

smaller sum. On these ruins, with the skill and credit, of which

parliament had not been able to despoil him, my grandfather at a

mature age erected the edifice of a new fortune: the labours of

sixteen years were amply rewarded; and I have reason to believe that

the second structure was not much inferior to the first. He had

realized a very considerable property in Sussex, Hampshire,

Buckinghamshire, and the New River Company; and had acquired a

spacious house, with gardens and lands, at Putney, in Surrey, where

he resided in decent hospitality. He died in December 1736, at the

age of seventy; and by his last will, at the expense of Edward, his

only son, (with whose marriage he was not perfectly reconciled,)

enriched his two daughters, Catherine and Hester. The former became

the wife of Mr. Edward Elliston, an East India captain: their

daughter and heiress Catherine was married in the year 1756 to

Edward Eliot, Esq. (now lord Eliot), of Port Eliot, in the county of

Cornwall; and their three sons are my nearest male relations on the

father's side. A life of devotion and celibacy was the choice of my

aunt, Mrs. Hester Gibbon, who, at the age of eighty-five, still

resides in a hermitage at Cliffe, in Northamptonshire; having long

survived her spiritual guide and faithful companion Mr. William Law,

who, at an advanced age, about the year 1761, died in her house. In

our family he had left the reputation of a worthy and pious man, who

believed all that he professed, and practised all that he enjoined.

The character of a non-juror, which he maintained to the last, is a

sufficient evidence of his principles in church and state; and the

sacrifice of interest to conscience will be always respectable. His

theological writings, which our domestic connection has tempted me

to peruse, preserve an imperfect sort of life, and I can pronounce

with more confidence and knowledge on the merits of the author. His

last compositions are darkly tinctured by the incomprehensible

visions of Jacob Behmen; and his discourse on the absolute

unlawfulness of stage entertainments is sometimes quoted for a

ridiculous intemperance of sentiment and language.--"The actors and

spectators must all be damned: the playhouse is the porch of Hell,

the place of the Devil's abode, where he holds his filthy court of

evil spirits: a play is the Devil's triumph, a sacrifice performed

to his glory, as much as in the heathen temples of Bacchus or Venus,

&c., &c." But these sallies of religious frenzy must not extinguish

the praise, which is due to Mr. William Law as a wit and a scholar.

His argument on topics of less absurdity is specious and acute, his

manner is lively, his style forcible and clear; and, had not his

vigorous mind been clouded by enthusiasm, he might be ranked with

the most agreeable and ingenious writers of the times. While the

Bangorian controversy was a fashionable theme, he entered the lists

on the subject of Christ's kingdom, and the authority of the

priesthood: against the plain account of the sacrament of the Lord's

Supper he resumed the combat with Bishop Hoadley, the object of Whig

idolatry, and Tory abhorrence; and at every weapon of attack and

defence the non-juror, on the ground which is common to both,

approves himself at least equal to the prelate. On the appearance

of the Fable of the Bees, he drew his pen against the licentious

doctrine that private vices are public benefits, and morality as

well as religion must join in his applause. Mr. Law's master-work,

the Serious Call, is still read as a popular and powerful book of

devotion. His precepts are rigid, but they are founded on the

gospel; his satire is sharp, but it is drawn from the knowledge of

human life; and many of his portraits are not unworthy of the pen of

La Bruyere. If he finds a spark of piety in his reader's mind, he

will soon kindle it to a flame; and a philosopher must allow that he

exposes, with equal severity and truth, the strange contradiction

between the faith and practice of the Christian world. Under the

names of Flavia and Miranda he has admirably described my two aunts

the heathen and the Christian sister.

My father, Edward Gibbon, was born in October, 1707: at the age of

thirteen he could scarcely feel that he was disinherited by act of

parliament; and, as he advanced towards manhood, new prospects of

fortune opened to his view. A parent is most attentive to supply in

his children the deficiencies, of which he is conscious in himself:

my grandfather's knowledge was derived from a strong understanding,

and the experience of the ways of men; but my father enjoyed the

benefits of a liberal education as a scholar and a gentleman. At

Westminster School, and afterwards at Emanuel College in Cambridge,

he passed through a regular course of academical discipline; and the

care of his learning and morals was intrusted to his private tutor,

the same Mr. William Law. But the mind of a saint is above or below

the present world; and while the pupil proceeded on his travels, the

tutor remained at Putney, the much-honoured friend and spiritual

director of the whole family. My father resided sometime at Paris

to acquire the fashionable exercises; and as his temper was warm and

social, he indulged in those pleasures, for which the strictness of

his former education had given him a keener relish. He afterwards

visited several provinces of France; but his excursions were neither

long nor remote; and the slender knowledge, which he had gained of

the French language, was gradually obliterated. His passage through

Besancon is marked by a singular consequence in the chain of human

events. In a dangerous illness Mr. Gibbon was attended, at his own

request, by one of his kinsmen of the name of Acton, the younger

brother of a younger brother, who had applied himself to the study

of physic. During the slow recovery of his patient, the physician

himself was attacked by the malady of love: he married his mistress,

renounced his country and religion, settled at Besancon, and became

the father of three sons; the eldest of whom, General Acton, is

conspicuous in Europe as the principal Minister of the king of the

Two Sicilies. By an uncle whom another stroke of fortune had

transplanted to Leghorn, he was educated in the naval service of the

Emperor; and his valour and conduct in the command of the Tuscan

frigates protected the retreat of the Spaniards from Algiers. On my

father's return to England he was chosen, in the general election of

1734, to serve in parliament for the borough of Petersfield; a

burgage tenure, of which my grandfather possessed a weighty share,

till he alienated (I know not why) such important property. In the

opposition to Sir Robert Walpole and the Pelhams, prejudice and

society connected his son with the Tories,--shall I say Jacobites?

or, as they were pleased to style themselves, the country gentlemen?

with them he gave many a vote; with them he drank many a bottle.

Without acquiring the fame of an orator or a statesman, he eagerly

joined in the great opposition, which, after a seven years' chase,

hunted down Sir Robert Walpole: and in the pursuit of an unpopular

minister, he gratified a private revenge against the oppressor of

his family in the South Sea persecution.

I was born at Putney, in the county of Surrey, April 27th, O. S., in

the year one thousand seven hundred and thirty-seven; the first

child of the marriage of Edward Gibbon, esq., and of Judith Porten.

[Note: The union to which I owe my birth was a marriage of

inclination and esteem. Mr. James Porten, a merchant of London,

resided with his family at Putney, in a house adjoining to the

bridge and churchyard, where I have passed many happy hours of my

childhood. He left one son (the late Sir Stanier Porten) and three

daughters; Catherine, who preserved her maiden name, and of whom I

shall hereafter speak; another daughter married Mr. Darrel of

Richmond, and left two sons, Edward and Robert: the youngest of the

three sisters was Judith, my mother.] My lot might have been that

of a slave, a savage, or a peasant; nor can I reflect without

pleasure on the bounty of Nature, which cast my birth in a free and

civilized country, in an age of science and philosophy, in a family

of honourable rank, and decently endowed with the gifts of fortune.

From my birth I have enjoyed the right of primogeniture; but I was

succeeded by five brothers and one sister, all of whom were snatched

away in their infancy. My five brothers, whose names may be found

in the parish register of Putney, I shall not pretend to lament: but

from my childhood to the present hour I have deeply and sincerely

regretted my sister, whose life was somewhat prolonged, and whom I

remember to have been an amiable infant. The relation of a brother

and a sister, especially if they do not marry, appears to me of a

very singular nature. It is a familiar and tender friendship with a

female, much about our own age; an affection perhaps softened by the

secret influence of sex, and the sole species of Platonic love that

can be indulged with truth, and without danger.

At the general election of 1741, Mr. Gibbon and Mr. Delme stood an

expensive and successful contest at Southampton, against Mr. Dummer

and Mr. Henly, afterwards Lord Chancellor and Earl of Northington.

The Whig candidates had a majority of the resident voters; but the

corporation was firm in the Tory interest: a sudden creation of one

hundred and seventy new freemen turned the scale; and a supply was

readily obtained of respectable volunteers, who flocked from all

parts of England to support the cause of their political friends.

The new parliament opened with the victory of an opposition, which

was fortified by strong clamour and strange coalitions. From the

event of the first divisions, Sir Robert Walpole perceived that he

could no longer lead a majority in the House of Commons, and

prudently resigned (after a dominion of one-and-twenty years) the

guidance of the state (1742). But the fall of an unpopular minister

was not succeeded, according to general expectation, by a millennium

of happiness and virtue: some courtiers lost their places, some

patriots lost their characters, Lord Orford's offences vanished with

his power; and after a short vibration, the Pelham government was

fixed on the old basis of the Whig aristocracy. In the year 1745,

the throne and the constitution were attacked by a rebellion, which

does not reflect much honour on the national spirit; since the

English friends of the Pretender wanted courage to join his

standard, and his enemies (the bulk of the people) allowed him to

advance into the heart of the kingdom. Without daring, perhaps

without desiring, to aid the rebels, my father invariably adhered to

the Tory opposition. In the most critical season he accepted, for

the service of the party, the office of alderman in the city of

London: but the duties were so repugnant to his inclination and

habits, that he resigned his gown at the end of a few months. The

second parliament in which he sat was prematurely dissolved (1747):

and as he was unable or unwilling to maintain a second contest for

Southampton, the life of the senator expired in that dissolution.

The death of a new-born child before that of its parents may seem an

unnatural, but it is strictly a probable, event: since of any given

number the greater part are extinguished before their ninth year,

before they possess the faculties of the mind or body. Without

accusing the profuse waste or imperfect workmanship of Nature, I

shall only observe, that this unfavourable chance was multiplied

against my infant existence. So feeble was my constitution, so

precarious my life, that, in the baptism of each of my brothers, my

father's prudence successively repeated my Christian name of Edward,

that, in case of the departure of the eldest son, this patronymic

appellation might be still perpetuated in the family.

--Uno avulso non deficit alter.

To preserve and to rear so frail a being, the most tender assiduity

was scarcely sufficient, and my mother's attention was somewhat

diverted by an exclusive passion for her husband, and by the

dissipation of the world, in which his taste and authority obliged

her to mingle. But the maternal office was supplied by my aunt,

Mrs. Catherine Porten; at whose name I feel a tear of gratitude

trickling down my cheek. A life of celibacy transferred her vacant

affection to her sister's first child; my weakness excited her pity;

her attachment was fortified by labour and success: and if there be

any, as I trust there are some, who rejoice that I live, to that

dear and excellent woman they must hold themselves indebted. Many

anxious and solitary days did she consume in the patient trial of

every mode of relief and amusement. Many wakeful nights did she sit

by my bedside in trembling expectation that each hour would be my

last. Of the various and frequent disorders of my childhood my own

recollection is dark. Suffice it to say, that while every

practitioner, from Sloane and Ward to the Chevalier Taylor, was

successively summoned to torture or relieve me, the care of my mind

was too frequently neglected for that of my health: compassion

always suggested an excuse for the indulgence of the master, or the

idleness of the pupil; and the chain of my education was broken, as

often as I was recalled from the school of learning to the bed of

sickness.

As soon as the use of speech had prepared my infant reason for the

admission of knowledge, I was taught the arts of reading, writing,

and arithmetic. So remote is the date, so vague is the memory of

their origin in myself, that, were not the error corrected by

analogy, I should be tempted to conceive them as innate. In my

childhood I was praised for the readiness with which I could

multiply and divide, by memory alone, two sums of several figures;

such praise encouraged my growing talent; and had I persevered in

this line of application, I might have acquired some fame in

mathematical studies.

After this previous institution at home, or at a day school at

Putney, I was delivered at the age of seven into the hands of Mr.

John Kirkby, who exercised about eighteen months the office of my

domestic tutor. His learning and virtue introduced him to my

father; and at Putney he might have found at least a temporary

shelter, had not an act of indiscretion driven him into the world.

One day reading prayers in the parish church, he most unluckily

forgot the name of King George: his patron, a loyal subject,

dismissed him with some reluctance, and a decent reward; and how the

poor man ended his days I have never been able to learn. Mr. John

Kirkby is the author of two small volumes; the Life of Automathes

(London, 1745), and an English and Latin Grammar (London, 1746);

which, as a testimony of gratitude, he dedicated (Nov. 5th, 1745) to

my father. The books are before me: from them the pupil may judge

the preceptor; and, upon the whole, his judgment will not be

unfavourable. The grammar is executed with accuracy and skill, and

I know not whether any better existed at the time in our language:

but the Life of Automathes aspires to the honours of a philosophical

fiction. It is the story of a youth, the son of a ship-wrecked

exile, who lives alone on a desert island from infancy to the age of

manhood. A hind is his nurse; he inherits a cottage, with many

useful and curious instruments; some ideas remain of the education

of his two first years; some arts are borrowed from the beavers of a

neighbouring lake; some truths are revealed in supernatural visions.

With these helps, and his own industry, Automathes becomes a

self-taught though speechless philosopher, who had investigated with

success his own mind, the natural world, the abstract sciences, and

the great principles of morality and religion. The author is not

entitled to the merit of invention, since he has blended the English

story of Robinson Crusoe with the Arabian romance of Hai Ebn

Yokhdan, which he might have read in the Latin version of Pocock.

In the Automathes I cannot praise either the depth of thought or

elegance of style; but the book is not devoid of entertainment or

instruction; and among several interesting passages, I would select

the discovery of fire, which produces by accidental mischief the

discovery of conscience. A man who had thought so much on the

subjects of language and education was surely no ordinary preceptor:

my childish years, and his hasty departure, prevented me from

enjoying the full benefit of his lessons; but they enlarged my

knowledge of arithmetic, and left me a clear impression of the

English and Latin rudiments.

In my ninth year (Jan., 1746), in a lucid interval of comparative

health, my father adopted the convenient and customary mode of

English education; and I was sent to Kingston-upon-Thames, to a

school of about seventy boys, which was kept by Dr. Wooddeson and

his assistants. Every time I have since passed over Putney Common,

I have always noticed the spot where my mother, as we drove along in

the coach, admonished me that I was now going into the world, and

must learn to think and act for myself. The expression may appear

ludicrous; yet there is not, in the course of life, a more

remarkable change than the removal of a child from the luxury and

freedom of a wealthy house, to the frugal diet and strict

subordination of a school; from the tenderness of parents, and the

obsequiousness of servants, to the rude familiarity of his equals,

the insolent tyranny of his seniors, and the rod, perhaps, of a

cruel and capricious pedagogue. Such hardships may steel the mind

and body against the injuries of fortune; but my timid reserve was

astonished by the crowd and tumult of the school; the want of

strength and activity disqualified me for the sports of the

play-field; nor have I forgotten how often in the year forty-six I

was reviled and buffeted for the sins of my Tory ancestors. By the

common methods of discipline, at the expence of many tears and some

blood, I purchased the knowledge of the Latin syntax: and not long

since I was possessed of the dirty volumes of Phaedrus and Cornelius

Nepos, which I painfully construed and darkly understood. The

choice of these authors is not injudicious. The lives of Cornelius

Nepos, the friend of Atticus and Cicero, are composed in the style

of the purest age: his simplicity is elegant, his brevity copious;

he exhibits a series of men and manners; and with such

illustrations, as every pedant is not indeed qualified to give, this

classic biographer may initiate a young student in the history of

Greece and Rome. The use of fables or apologues has been approved

in every age from ancient India to modern Europe. They convey in

familiar images the truths of morality and prudence; and the most

childish understanding (I advert to the scruples of Rousseau) will

not suppose either that beasts do speak, or that men may lie. A

fable represents the genuine characters of animals; and a skilful

master might extract from Pliny and Buffon some pleasing lessons of

natural history, a science well adapted to the taste and capacity of

children. The Latinity of Phaedrus is not exempt from an alloy of

the silver age; but his manner is concise, terse, and sententious;

the Thracian slave discreetly breathes the spirit of a freeman; and

when the text is found, the style is perspicuous. But his fables,

after a long oblivion, were first published by Peter Pithou, from a

corrupt manuscript. The labours of fifty editors confess the

defects of the copy, as well as the value of the original; and the

school-boy may have been whipped for misapprehending a passage,

which Bentley could not restore, and which Burman could not explain.

My studies were too frequently interrupted by sickness; and after a

real or nominal residence at Kingston School of near two years, I

was finally recalled (Dec., 1747) by my mother's death, in her

thirty-eighth year. I was too young to feel the importance of my

loss; and the image of her person and conversation is faintly

imprinted in my memory. The affectionate heart of my aunt,

Catherine Porten, bewailed a sister and a friend; but my poor father

was inconsolable, and the transport of grief seemed to threaten his

life or his reason. I can never forget the scene of our first

interview, some weeks after the fatal event; the awful silence, the

room hung with black, the mid-day tapers, his sighs and tears; his

praises of my mother, a saint in heaven; his solemn adjuration that

I would cherish her memory and imitate her virtues; and the fervor

with which he kissed and blessed me as the sole surviving pledge of

their loves. The storm of passion insensibly subsided into calmer

melancholy. At a convivial meeting of his friends, Mr. Gibbon might

affect or enjoy a gleam of cheerfulness; but his plan of happiness

was for ever destroyed: and after the loss of his companion he was

left alone in a world, of which the business and pleasures were to

him irksome or insipid. After some unsuccessful trials he renounced

the tumult of London and the hospitality of Putney, and buried

himself in the rural or rather rustic solitude of Beriton; from

which, during several years, he seldom emerged.

Memoirs of My Life and Writings · 第 1 / 13 段