8. And even if it be admitted; on account of the absence of a purpose.

Even if it were admitted that the Pradhâna is established by Inference,

the Sânkhya theory could not be accepted for the reason that the

Pradhâna is without a purpose. For, according to the view expressed in

the passage, 'In order that the soul may know the Pradhâna and become

isolated' (Sânkhya Kâ. I, 21), the purpose of the Pradhâna is fruition

and final release on the part of the soul; but both these are impossible.

For, as the soul consists of pure intelligence, is inactive, changeless,

and spotless, and hence eternally emancipated, it is capable neither of

fruition which consists in consciousness of Prakriti, nor of Release

which consists in separation from Prakriti. If, on the other hand, it be

held that the soul constituted as described is, owing to the mere

nearness of Prakriti, capable of fruition, i.e. of being conscious of

pleasure and pain, which are special modifications of Prakriti, it

follows that, as Prakriti is ever near, the soul will never accomplish

emancipation.

The Vedanta-Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja Sacred Books of the East, Volume 48 · 第 144 / 339 题