Now for the single groups:--

1. B is seated rowing in a boat, as he is represented also on pages 29c,

36b, 40c and 43c. A creature is swimming beneath him, which may be a

crocodile. The fifth hieroglyph is the important 9 Kan already discussed,

the fourth is _a_ and the second the cross _b_ combined with Caban. The day

is the 210th of the year.

2. B is walking with the atlatl in his hand, and armed with javelins.

Hieroglyph 5, Manik, denotes the chase, but has a prefix, which often seems

to have the meaning of 20. 2 is the elongated head _q_ with the prefix of

the east belonging to the Kan years. 4 is a Moan sign (c) with the

leaf-shaped prefix. Does this perhaps denote the slaying of game in the

forest? It is remarkable that B's feet are hidden, as if he were walking in

sand or in a bog.

3. B is walking, carrying a large stick like that for tilling the field, as

on pages 38b and 39b, and he bears a carrying-frame; there are footprints

below him. Hieroglyph 2 is the compound of the signs for south and east, 4

(_r_) may denote rain, and 5 is two elongated heads with an unknown prefix.

4. B, is seated on astronomical signs as on page 37c. The copal pouch is

hanging from his neck and he is brandishing his hatchet. Sign 2 is _b_, 4

is _a_ and 5 is _r_, but all three signs have unusual prefixes; the first

of these prefixes appears again in the tenth group, 41 days later.

5. B is seated on a head, probably that of D, which, however, is peculiar

owing to the ornaments resembling bunches of grapes in place of both the

eye and the ear (compare pages 39c and 41a). I do not venture to decide

what he holds in his hand nor what are the other objects which he carries.

Sign 2 is _r_ with a prefix, 4 is Imix perhaps with a knife as a prefix, 5

is the skeleton which sometimes belongs to the lightning beast, but also to

the 14th month; its prefix is unknown.

6. B is seated on a support, which contains two cross-bones, down to which

he points with his right hand, while his left hand holds the hatchet on his

knee. Sign 2 is the crouching naked personage, with the cross _b_ prefixed,

4 is the elongated head with a prefixed Yax, and 5 is Kan with a vessel as

a prefix (instead of Imix) from which steam or froth is rising. The day is

the 234th of the year, _i.e._, the end of a week of 18 × 13 days.

7. B is sitting on a tree at the root of which his own head appears

(compare with this the representations on pages 31c, 33c, and especially

40a, and also 41b and 42b). The second sign is Yax with a prefix; 4 is Kin

within which there is a 1, as is several times the case, for example, on

pages 61 and 69. The fifth sign is still a mystery to me. The day here is V

Manik. Do the hieroglyphs suggest that the interval from the day IX Kan,

which gives the name to the year, to V Manik is exactly the same as that

from the normal date IV Ahau to the true starting-point of our passage, the

day XIII Akbal? Both intervals are 243.

8. B is seated in a house, on the roof, wall and floor of which are several

Caban signs, just as on page 30a; he seems to be pointing forward. Sign 2

is Caban with a prefix, the 4th and also the 5th is Kan with two unusual

prefixes.

9. Water is pictured at the bottom of this picture, and in it are a fish, a

mussel and a snail (possibly page 37b may be compared with this). There

seems to be a suggestion of footprints on the margin of the water, back of

which B is walking, his legs hidden as far as the knees. He holds the

hatchet uplifted in his left hand and his right holds what may be a

long-stemmed aquatic plant (compare page 42b). Sign 2 is composed of _b_,

Imix, the mouth and nose of C and the object which apparently is a beak,

previously met with in sign 1. 4 is Kan-Imix, and 5 is Kan with prefix and

suffix.

10. B is seated in an expectant attitude, his hands resting on his knees.

We see a very similar representation of him on page 38a, where he faces

himself, and in general the remaining pictures of that passage furnish a

striking parallel to the present one. Sign 2 is a head (E's?) with a call

seemingly issuing from its mouth. 4 is the elongated head _q_ with the

Ben-Ik superfix and an unusual prefix, which we found on page 66c prefixed

to the cross _b_; 5 is Kan with the same prefix, which I regarded as

denoting a call in sign 2, and which is probably answered here by an

affirmative cry.

11. The expectation has been fulfilled. B is seated on a mat holding a

woman in the same position as on page 38a. Sign 2 is the cross _b_ with the

prefixed beak as in 1, and also with another prefix, which seems sometimes

to denote the number 20. 4 is exactly the same Kin with 1 and the

leaf-shaped prefix, which occurred in the same place with the seventh

picture. 5 contains the sign for 73 days; a new period of this length

begins here on the 74th day.

12. As in the parallel passage on page 38 B seems to be offering a Kan, so

here his gift consists of a kind of wreath, like the one in the fifth

picture; he is seated on astronomical signs, which contain the cross _b_

twice as does also hieroglyph 2. 4 is Kin-Akbal, and 5 is a Kan with the

prefix which generally belongs to the south as a superfix.

13. B is seated on the elongated head _q_ with a superfix and a prefix,

exactly as on pages 37c and 40a, and this sign is repeated in the

hieroglyphs (in 2) just as it is in the two former places. He holds the

eagle on his lap and we see him connected with the same bird in a different

way on page 43c. Is B represented here as the preventer of evil? Hieroglyph

4 is _a_, while 5 is Kan, apparently with the sign of the south as a

prefix. A Bacab period of 91 days ends here. We come now to the upper

series of pictures.

14. B is walking in the rain, with the copal pouch around his neck and the

hatchet uplifted in his left hand. An unknown object, possibly held in his

right hand, is hanging in front of his legs. Hieroglyphs 1 and 3 are

effaced, 2 is indistinct, 5 seems to be a Xul (end, close) and 6 is E's

head.

15. B is walking, brandishing the hatchet in his left hand, and holding in

his right an object resembling a cornucopia filled with fruit; below this

hangs what appears to be a flower. The god wears the copal pouch.

Hieroglyph 1 is a hand holding K's head; it is curious that this sign

should also occur in the next group as an indication of the approaching

Muluc year. 3 is a sign still undetermined; but the prefix is the crouching

naked personage with dots suggesting stars around its head. I have often

thought that similar figures represented Mercury; it is remarkable that

exactly the 115th day of this section is reached here, corresponding with

the apparent revolution of Mercury = 115 days. Similarly sign 2 invites

computation; it is a face resembling an Ahau sign, with a 3 as a superfix

and a 9 as a prefix; compare the other places containing the same face,

with 33c. After the fashion of the inscriptions this would denote 9 + 3 ×

20 = 69, which by the way is three fifths of the Mercury revolution. 5 is a

compound of Akbal and Imix and 6 a compound of a Moan sign (_c_) with a.

16. B is in a half sitting position and holds a strange object before

himself. On top of his own head is K's, which is repeated in sign 2. I do

not know how to explain 1, unless it is the bat-god; 3 is a Xul = end (but

of what?) combined with Imix, and 5 is the usual Kan-Imix. 6 is a Kin with

an 8 back of it (as 36b, 37b, 67a, 68a) and over it is a hand pointing to

the right, just like those in groups 20 and 25. This looks as if we ought

to count forward 8 days, but what can be the purpose of doing so?

17. B is walking armed with spear and shield. Sign 1 is _b_, 2 the face

resembling an Ahau, which occupied the second place in group 15, 3 is

probably Xul again, but with an effaced prefix; of 5 also only an Imix

remains; while 6 is the usual compound of Muluc-Caban.

18. We have now reached the day 16 Kayab, a day very close to the day 18

Kayab, which on page 24 we recognized as an especially important day, while

in my article "Zur Entzifferung III" I regarded it as the day of the summer

solstice. Computed from the normal date IV Ahau 8 Cumhu it may also have

denoted the end of a lunar year, as on pages 51-58 where it is the basis of

the series. The picture here agrees with this. B is sitting in the pouring

rain of the rainy season and gazing upward at the planets, as on page 36c

and particularly on 39c; the sun and moon are also represented, but below

the planets. The hieroglyphs likewise contain the sun and moon in 1 and 2,

in 3, Ahau and Xul with a prefix, as if this were the end of the increase

of the sun's power; 5 is Kin-Akbal, day and night, and 6 is Caban with the

cross b.

19. B is walking armed with hatchet and shield. He holds a serpent in his

hand as on page 40c, but here with the head downward. Hieroglyphs 1 and 2

are destroyed, 3 is the cross _b_ with a suffix and the horse-shoe prefix

_e_, known to us from pages 5 and 6. 5 is Imix combined with Chuen and

probably with Yax, and 6 is E's head.

20. This is the old red woman with the tiger claws, whom we saw on pages

39b and 43b and shall see again on page 74; she reinforces the water

falling from the planets by pouring a stream from her jug. The first three

hieroglyphs are effaced, 4 is the elongated head _q_, 5 is Kin-Akbal, 6, as

in group 16, is again the enigmatical 8 with a hand pointing to the right.

21. B is walking and bears pouch, spear and shield. Hieroglyph 1 is a hand

holding the sign of the rising Moan, just as in 15 a hand holds the head of

K; 2 is again K, whose sign is probably effaced several times in the last

groups of this series. 3 is E with the sign of the east; 5 is compounded of

Imix, Chuen and _b_, and 6 is Kin with the sign of the north. Here the day

of the normal date is reached, but this may be significant only for the

year 9 Ix.

22. We come now to the representation of the change of the year, which we

have already mentioned. Hieroglyph 1 is curious, consisting of the moon

with a stripe running around it like a strap; 3 and 5 are not clear to me

and are doubtless closely connected with one another; 3 also contains a

trace of K and is perhaps a determinative of the same. 6 is again E, and

suggests the tilling of the fields.

23. This picture as well as the first two hieroglyphs have already been

discussed above. The crouching personage, repeated again in 3 as a prefix

to the cross _b_, is curious. 5 is again E and 6 is Imix, referring to

grain and honey.

24. The picture and three of the hieroglyphs plainly correspond. The grain

deity E holds food and drink in his hand. Rain is pouring from the planets,

and the wind-beast plunges down, as on pages 44 and 45. Sign 3 is E's

hieroglyph, 6 is Kan-Imix and 2 is the wind-beast. B is superfluously added

in 4 and the same is true of the cross _b_ in 1, while Kin-Akbal in 5 seems

to fit almost everywhere. Pages 29a, 30a and 45c show the lightning-beast

in a different form.

25. As is usually the case, rain is pouring from the stars and below them

are the sun and moon as before. This time C is sitting in the rain, clad in

the gala mantle and holding Kan. Hieroglyphs 1, 2 and 4, the latter

apparently representing C, are effaced. The other three are enigmatical, 3

is again Xul with a prefixed 9, 5 a Caban, but with an unintelligible

prefix, and 6 is again the mysterious 8.

26. B is sitting on a tree or sacrificial stone, which is colored half blue

and half red, and may denote the ceasing of the rainy season; he is

brandishing his hatchet. Hieroglyphs 1, 2 and 3 are effaced; 4 is B's sign,

5 might be Xul and 6 is _a_ with _c_ added and thus referring to the Moan.

And here the half of the ritual year ends with the 182nd day, which is XIII

Chicchan 18 Pop (10 Muluc); and it is left to the reader to imagine or to

find hieroglyphs and pictures for the other two series of numeral signs.

I am troubled about the five naked crouching figures of this section, which

I am inclined to regard as the sign for Mercury with its apparent

revolution of 115 days, which, however, seems sometimes (as on pages 54, 56

and 58 in the upper sections) to be raised to the value of half a

Tonalamatl = 130 days. This may be explained by the fact that it is

difficult to determine exactly the length of the revolution of Mercury. In

group 15 this figure appears exactly on the 115th day of this section, but

in group 6 on the 234th day of the year, _i.e._, approximately at the

expiration of two Mercury periods after the beginning of the year. But now

for group 23. Here there are three of these crouching figures. The two

upper ones leaning back to back must serve the purpose of indicating the

change in the year. But they would hardly do so, if the third personage

were not added, which may indicate that the solar year consists

approximately of three Mercury periods. I look upon this view of the matter

merely as the first attempt at an explanation.

Pages 69--73.

The chief subject of the last great section of this Manuscript is two of

the usual series, from which large numbers are developed in the usual way

and the largest of all is finally recorded in a serpent. This section thus

forms a parallel to the contents of pages 61-64, but is somewhat more

composite.

Before I begin the discussion of these series, I wish to examine two

passages, which I think are not connected with these series, but are

independent, like the instance on pages 51-58, where the hieroglyphs were

found to be quite independent of the numerals. The Mayas took advantage of

space wherever it presented itself, which is admissible in ideographic

writing.

The first of these two passages is at the top of pages 71-73. Here there

are four horizontal rows of twelve hieroglyphs each. Since, however, the

top row is entirely effaced and none of the other three are perfectly

preserved, it is quite impossible at present to judge of the

interconnection of the whole. But I must point out a certain resemblance to

the passage on pages 44b-45b, where a period of 78 days is considered with

reference to the wind-deities. The first and sixth columns of pages 71-72

likewise contain the signs for wind and the pierced ears. The fact that the

Bacab sign occurs in the eighth column, and in no other, must attract

'attention; if we knew it to be effaced in the first column, then each

column might refer to 13 days, though 12 × 13, it is true, does not form a

natural whole. C's sign is the only hieroglyph of a god to be found in both

passages. E also occurs on pages 44b-45b and may be one of the effaced

signs on pages 71-72. There is no trace left of the others. The fact that

some hieroglyphs occur in both the passages referred to proves nothing with

regard to signs in frequent use and I can find no cases of correspondence

among those occurring more rarely. Hence this passage must be left for the

present as an almost complete mystery.

I have discussed the second passage in detail in my article "Zur

Entzifferung der Mayahandschriften V," of the year 1895, and from it I will

borrow the following. This second passage fills the middle and lower thirds

of pages 71-73, occupying the same space as the first passage in the upper

third, and offering far more reliable material than the latter.

That these hieroglyphs are not connected with the numerals above and below,

can be deduced from the fact that the numbers follow one another from right

to left and the hieroglyphs in the reversed order. This is proved by the

hand pointing to the right, which occurs here at least eight times like the

one occurring twenty times on pages 46-50.

But the scribe, misled by the direction of the numeral series, began on

page 71 to write the _first_ of these hieroglyphs from the right instead of

from the left, but after the first four groups he corrected his mistake.

Hence I read the groups of three hieroglyphs each, in the following

order:--

Page 71. Page 72. Page 73.

2 1 | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | 19 20 21 22 23

4 3 | 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | 24 25 26 27 28

The number 28 shows that we have to do here with 28 weeks of 13 days each,

_i.e._, with a ritual year of 364 days, as was the case on pages 31-32,

63-64 and 65-69. This year, however, is divided into four parts of 7 x 13 =

91 days, _i.e._, into four so-called Bacab periods. This is very plainly

indicated here, for groups 4, 11, 18 and 25, _i.e._, those separated by

seven groups each, are exactly alike, but in group 4b (I will designate the

three hieroglyphs of each group from top to bottom by _a_, _b_ and _c_)

there is a prefixed 4 which refers to the four Bacabs as does the same 4

prefixed to the Bacab sign at the top of page 72.

Now the question arises as to when this ritual year began. Undoubtedly its

beginning day was very different from that of the civil year (360 days) and

from that of the astronomical year (365 days).

In this matter I follow Mrs. Zelia Nuttall, who has rendered such estimable

service to Aztec science. At the Congress of Americanists at Stockholm in

1894, she submitted an article entitled "Note on the Ancient Mexican

Calendar System," in which with keen discernment she pointed out a year

beginning with the spring equinox and including in its centre the sacred

Tonalamatl, _i.e._, 260 days, which were preceded and followed by 52 days.

I recognize this ritual year also in the present passage of the

"Dresdensis," as the one current in the Maya country. It probably began

about the 10th of March, at that period about the time of the vernal

equinox, according to the Julian Calendar.

Beginning with this date, I will now attempt to tabulate the chronology of

this passage. In the first column I will place the number of the group of

hieroglyphs in question, in the second I will set down to what day of the

Maya year each group refers; in the third, the corresponding day of our

year, and finally in the fourth, the 20-day periods which agree in general

with the dates.

1. 1-13 March 10-22 Ceh.

2. 14-26 March 23-April 5 Mac.

3. 27-39 April 6-18 } Kankin.

4. 40-52 April 19-May 1 }

5. 53-65 May 2-14 Moan.

6. 66-78 May 15-27, Pax.

7. 79-91 May 28-June 9 } Kayab.

8. 92-104 June 10-22 }

9. 105-117 June 23-July 5 } Cumhu.

10. 118-130 July 6-18 }

11. 131-143 July 19-31 Pop.

12. 144-156 August 1-13 } Uo.

13. 157-169 August 14-26 }

14. 170-182 August 27-September 8 Zip.

15. 183-195 September 9-21 } Zotz.

16. 196-208 September 22-October 4 }

17. 209-221 October 5-17 Zec.

18. 222-234 October 18-30 } Xul.

19. 235-247 October 31-November 12 }

20. 248-260 November 13-25 Yaxkin.

21. 261-273 November 26-December 8 } Mol.

22. 274-286 December 9-21 }

23. 287-299 December 22-January 3 } Chen.

24. 300-312 January 4-16 }

25. 313-325 January 17-29 Yax.

26. 326-338 January 30-February 11 } Zac.

27. 339-351 February 12-24 }

28. 352-364 February 25-March 8 Ceh.

In the following I will call attention to a few points by which this

arrangement is justified.

Hieroglyph 1a admits of explanation. It consists of four parts:--the left

top is Kin, meaning sun or day, the right top is the sign of the year, the

right bottom is the knife as symbol of separation or division, and the left

bottom, which is especially decisive, is the month Ceh. Hence I read 1a

thus:--the day of the change of year in the month Ceh. The sign 1b is the

familiar Kin-Akbal signifying either the beginning day or the day Akbal. If

the year should be named from this sign, then this would mean a Kan year,

as in the preceding section the beginning lay in the year 9 Kan. If the

year in the latter section had been as equally divided as the one in

question here, it would have furnished us with some very remarkable

parallels.

Again the four groups:--4, 11, 18 and 25, which are alike, are important.

The cross in sign _a_, combined with the three dotted lines passing from

top to bottom, may refer to the wind and this meaning is further confirmed

by the Ik sign (wind) in c. Further the sign _b_ between them is that for

the Bacab, the wind deity itself.

The most important events of the year are obviously the sowing and

harvesting of the maize together with the beginning and end of the rainy

season. Now we find the first two in connection with the god E, the

maize-god, who is represented in 6c and 13c, 91 days apart, corresponding

to the end of May and the beginning of August. Generally speaking, sixty

days only were reckoned as the time between sowing and reaping, but here a

quarter of a year may have been taken as a round number and it may also

have reference to a more elevated region.

I am inclined to think that the beginning and end of the rainy season are

referred to in signs 8c and 16c, where, as it seems to me, three lines of

drops are falling from a rectangle denoting the sky (as is usual) like the

representation of rain dropping from a cloud at the bottom of page 36

(second picture). The serpent 8b as symbol of water may also refer to the

same thing, especially as it is combined with an Akbal (often denoting

beginning). The sign, which I think denotes the rainy season, is very

similar, but not the same as another one, which is common to the Dresdensis

and Tro-Cortesianus, the significance of which is certainly very close to

the idea of the week of 13 days.

I have some other ideas on this subject, which, however, are mere

conjectures, advanced with some hesitation. If the Chuen sign in 7a is

actually a serpent's jaw, then it might refer to the beginning of the

astronomical year in May, since the serpent so often designates that time.

In 9b we find a crouching figure with the sign which is usually considered

that of the death-bird. In another place (Zur Entzifferung IV, 12) I have

regarded the naked human figure placed upside down on page 58 as the sign

for Mercury, and on page 60 at the bottom, left, I also regarded the

crouching figure as representing Mercury vanquished by Venus. But in 9b,

which belongs to the 105th-117th days of the year, a 115 day revolution of

Mercury is computed. A crouching figure, like that in 9b, likewise appears

on page 65a in the second series of 91 days after 11 + 13 = 24 days of this

series have elapsed, _i.e._, directly after the 115 days of the apparent

revolution of Mercury.

In 10b, and it is the only place in this passage, we find the hieroglyph of

B, the leading god of this Manuscript. This corresponds with the time of

the greatest power of the sun and of the change in the civil year (July

16th). In Group 12, do _a_ and _c_ mean the year and is _b_ the head with

the Akbal eye, thus denoting the beginning of the civil year? It ought

really to have formed group 11, but there was no room for it, since it was

necessary that the signs for the period of 91 days should be set down

there.

Signs 14a and the combined signs 15bc are almost alike and suggest 1a. Is

it intended to designate here the ritual year, the time of the autumnal

equinox (September 10th?). In 15a two hooks, turned in opposite directions

proceed from one side of the sun-glyph. Do they signify two halves of the

year and does the 3 in front of them signify the third quarter of the year?

20b is the sign of the death-god A, probably not placed accidentally here

at the end of the month Xul, which denotes the end; but the end of what?

The hieroglyph in 23a is a black bird, with two hooks, one pointing up and

the other down, projecting from its head. Usually these hooks belong to K,

and by means of them this bird becomes the storm-bird; the year symbol is

below. Does this hieroglyph signify the time of the shortest day, when

darkness predominates?

A peculiarity of this passage is the striking frequency of the sign looked

upon as that of the death-bird as well as of the cognate sign, which is

commonly considered as that of the rising Moan. The first bird is in the

14th group, in the 9th it is combined with the apparent Mercury sign, and

in the 17th with the year sign. The second bird with the prefixed Yax is in

the 2nd group. But it is especially striking that several times both signs,

and this is the case nowhere else, are combined into a single sign in

groups 9, 13 and 26 and also probably in 19 where, however, the Moan sign

seems to be effaced.

This is all I have to say at the present time in reference to this

calendar. Some of my statements are positive and some are only conjectures.

Compare my treatise "Zwei Hieroglyphenreihen in der Dresdener

Mayahandschrift" (Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 1905, 2 and 3).

Having disposed in this way of the two supplementary subjects of this

section, I will now proceed to consider the principal theme, viz:--the two

series and whatever is connected with them.

Commentary on the Maya Manuscript in the Royal Public Library of Dresden · 第 84 / 105 题