LETTER II.

But I might perhaps make a better use of the opening you afford me

if I were to direct your mind to a loftier theme than that of art.

It would appear to be unseasonable to go in search of a code for the

aesthetic world, when the moral world offers matter of so much

higher interest, and when the spirit of philosophical inquiry is so

stringently challenged by the circumstances of our times to occupy

itself with the most perfect of all works of art--the establishment

and structure of a true political freedom.

It is unsatisfactory to live out of your own age and to work for

other times. It is equally incumbent on us to be good members of our

own age as of our own state or country. If it is conceived to be

unseemly and even unlawful for a man to segregate himself from the

customs and manners of the circle in which he lives, it would be

inconsistent not to see that it is equally his duty to grant a

proper share of influence to the voice of his own epoch, to its

taste and its requirements, in the operations in which he engages.

But the voice of our age seems by no means favorable to art, at all

events to that kind of art to which my inquiry is directed. The

course of events has given a direction to the genius of the time

that threatens to remove it continually further from the ideal of

art. For art has to leave reality, it has to raise itself bodily

above necessity and neediness for art is the daughter of freedom,

and it requires its prescriptions and rules to be furnished by the

necessity of spirits and not by that of matter. But in our day it is

necessity, neediness, that prevails, and bends a degraded humanity

under its iron yoke. Utility is the great idol of the time, to which

all powers do homage and all subjects are subservient. In this great

balance of utility, the spiritual service of art has no weight, and,

deprived of all encouragement, it vanishes from the noisy Vanity

Fair of our time. The very spirit of philosophical inquiry itself

robs the imagination of one promise after another, and the frontiers

of art are narrowed, in proportion as the limits of science are

enlarged.

The eyes of the philosopher as well as of the man of the world are

anxiously turned to the theatre of political events, where it is

presumed the great destiny of man is to be played out. It would

almost seem to betray e culpable indifference to the welfare of

society if we did not share this general interest. For this great

commerce in social and moral principles is of necessity a matter of

the greatest concern to every human being, on the ground both of its

subject and of its results. It must accordingly be of deepest moment

to every man to think for himself. It would seem that now at length

a question that formerly was only settled by the law of the stronger

is to be determined by the calm judgment of the reason, and every

man who is capable of placing himself in a central position, and

raising his individuality into that of his species, can look upon

himself as in possession of this judicial faculty of reason; being

moreover, as man and member of the human family, a party in the case

under trial and involved more or less in its decisions. It would

thus appear that this great political process is not only engaged

with his individual case, it has also to pronounce enactments, which

he as a rational spirit is capable of enunciating and entitled to

pronounce.

It is evident that it would have been most attractive to me to

inquire into an object such as this, to decide such a question in

conjunction with a thinker of powerful mind, a man of liberal

sympathies, and a heart imbued with a noble enthusiasm for the weal

of humanity. Though so widely separated by worldly position, it

would have been a delightful surprise to have found your

unprejudiced mind arriving at the same result as my own in the field

of ideas, Nevertheless, I think I can not only excuse, but even

justify by solid grounds, my step in resisting this attractive

purpose and in preferring beauty to freedom. I hope that I shall

succeed in convincing you that this matter of art is less foreign to

the needs than to the tastes of our age; nay, that, to arrive at a

solution even in the political problem, the road of aesthetics must

be pursued, because it is through beauty that we arrive at freedom.

But I cannot carry out this proof without my bringing to your

remembrance the principles by which the reason is guided in

political legislation.

Literary and Philosophical Essays: French, German and Italian · 第 52 / 96 题