DID WE EAT ONE ANOTHER?

There is no doubt of it. The unwelcome truth has been long suppressed

by interested parties who find their account in playing sycophant to

that self-satisfied tyrant Modern Man; but to the impartial philosopher

it is as plain as the nose upon the elephant’s face that our ancestors

ate one another. The custom of the Fiji Islanders, which is their only

stock-in-trade, their only claim to notoriety, is a relic of barbarism;

but it is a relic of our barbarism.

Man is naturally a carnivorous animal. That none but green-grocers

will dispute. That he was formerly less vegetarian in his diet than

at present, is clear from the fact that market gardening increases in

the ratio of civilization. So we may safely assume that at some remote

period Man subsisted on an exclusively flesh diet. Our uniform vanity

has given us the human mind as the acme of intelligence, the human face

and figure as the standard of beauty. Of course we cannot deny to human

fat and lean an equal superiority over beef, mutton and pork. It is

plain that our meat-eating ancestors would think in this way, and being

unrestrained by the mawkish sentiment attendant on high civilization,

would act habitually on the obvious suggestion. _A priori_,

therefore, it is clear that we ate ourselves.

Philology is about the only thread that connects us with the

prehistoric past. By picking up and piecing together the scattered

remnants of language, we form a patchwork of wondrous design and

significance. Consider the derivation of the word “sarcophagus,” and

see if it be not suggestive of potted meats. Observe the significance

of the phrase “sweet sixteen.” What a world of meaning lurks in the

expression “she is as sweet as a peach,” and how suggestive of luncheon

are the words “tender youth.” A kiss is but a modified bite, and a fond

mother, when she says her babe is “almost good enough to eat,” merely

shows that she is herself only a trifle too good to eat it.

These evidences might be multiplied _ad infinitum_; but if enough

has been said to induce one human being to revert to the diet of his

forefathers the object of this essay is accomplished.

1868.

The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 09 Tangential Views · 第 40 / 83 题