CHAPTER II. THE REFORMATION IN TEUTONIC COUNTRIES: SWITZERLAND,

DENMARK, SWEDEN, ENGLAND.

THE SWISS REFORMATION: ZWINGLI.--The founder of Protestantism in

Switzerland was _Ulrich Zwingli_. He was born in 1484. His father

was the leading man in a mountain village. The son, at _Vienna_

and at _Basel_, became a proficient in the humanist studies. He

read the Greek authors and the Bible in the original. A curate first at

_Glarus_, and then at _Einsiedeln_, he became pastor at

_Zurich_. As early as 1518 he preached against the sale of

indulgences. He was a scholarly man, bluff and kindly in his ways, and

an impressive orator. The Swiss were corrupted by their employment as

mercenary soldiers, hired by France, by the Pope, or by the emperor. Of

the demoralizing influence of this practice, _Zwingli_ became

deeply convinced; and his exertions as a Church reformer were mingled

with a patriotic zeal for the moral and political regeneration of

Switzerland. Mainly by his influence, _Zurich_ separated from the

jurisdiction of the bishop of Constance, and became Protestant in

1524. The example of _Zurich_ was followed by _Berne_ (1528)

and by _Basel_ (1529). _Zwingli_ agreed with _Luther_ on

the two main points of the sole authority of the Scriptures, and the

doctrine of salvation by faith alone; but on the _sacrament_ of

the _Lord's Supper_ he went farther in his dissent from the Church

of Rome. This made Luther and his followers stand aloof when cordial

fellowship was proposed between the two parties.

CIVIL STRIFE: DEATH OF ZWINGLI.--The aim of _Zwingli_ was to

establish a republican constitution in the several cantons, and also in

the confederation as a body, where the five Forest Cantons had an undue

share of power. These adhered to the old Church. In _Berne_ the

oligarchic party was supplanted by the republican, reforming party,--an

event of decisive importance. As the irritation increased between the

Forest Cantons and the cities, the former entered into a league with

_Ferdinand_ of Austria, and the cities leaned for support on the

German states in sympathy with their opinions. A treaty was made

(1529), but each side accused the other of breaking it. At length war

began: _Berne_ failed to come to the help of _Zurich_. Each

city wished to be the metropolis of the reformed confederation. The

forces of _Zurich_ were vanquished at _Cappel_, where

_Zwingli_ himself, who was on the field in the capacity of a

chaplain, was slain (1531). By the peace of _Cappel_ in 1531,

Protestantism was not coerced, but a check was put upon its

progress. Neither party was strong enough to subdue the other.

PROTESTANTISM IN SCANDINAVIA.--In the Scandinavian countries,

monarchical power was built up by means of the Reformation. The union

of _Calmar_ (1397) under Queen _Margaret_, between

_Denmark, Norway,_ and _Sweden,_ had been a dynastic

union. The several peoples were not united in feeling. The sovereign,

moreover, had his power limited by a strong feudal nobility, and by a

rich Church impatient of control. First the Church was overcome by

means of Protestantism, and then the nobles.

THE REFORMATION IN DENMARK--On the accession of _Christian I._ of

_Oldenburg_ (1448-1481), the duchies of _Holstein_ and

_Schleswig_ became connected with Denmark in a personal union. His

grandson, _Christian II._ (1513-1523), did not rule the duchies,

which were governed by _Frederic I_., who afterwards succeeded

_Christian II_. as king of Denmark. _Christian II_. was bent

on putting down the aristocracy, lay and clerical, but lacked the moral

qualities necessary to success in so difficult a task. He at first

favored Protestantism from political motives. He hoped to bring the

_Swedes_ into subjection by the aid of the _Danes_, and then

to subdue the Danish nobility. In _Sweden_ the nobles practically

ruled; and the regency was in the hands of the _Stures_, who

befriended the common people, and were opposed by the other nobles and

the clergy. _Christian_ made use of these divisions, and of the

help of German and French troops, to get possession of _Stockholm_

(1520). He took the Catholic side. But his perfidy, and the massacre of

eminent Swedes,--known as the _Massacre of Stockholm,_--excited an

inextinguishable hatred against _Denmark_. The Danish nobles

feared the same sort of treatment. The king's attempts at reform

offended them without pleasing the peasants, and a revolution took

place which dethroned him. Duke _Frederic_ of _Schleswig_ was

made king (1523): the duchies and _Denmark_ were again

together. _Frederic_ swore not to introduce the Reformation, nor

to attack Catholicism. But he was an ardent Lutheran. The new doctrine

had come into the land, and was spreading. The nobles, who coveted the

possessions of the Church, espoused it. At the Diet of _Odensee_,

in 1527, toleration was granted to Lutheranism. On _Frederic's_

death, in 1533, an effort of the bishops to restore the exclusive

domination of the old system of religion was defeated. _Christian

III._ was made king; and at a Diet at _Copenhagen_ in 1536, the

Reformation was legalized, and the Lutheran system, with bishops or

superintendents, was established.

THE REFORMATION IN SWEDEN.--After the massacre of Stockholm,

_Denmark_ was detested by the Swedes. A great political revolution

occurred, which involved also a religious revolution. The author of the

change, and the real founder of the Swedish monarchy, was _Gustavus

Vasa_, a young Swede of noble family, who had been held as a captive

in _Copenhagen_, but had escaped and returned to his country. He

was of imposing presence, prudent yet daring, and with a natural gift

of eloquence. Amid great dangers and sufferings, such as tradition

ascribed to King _Alfred_ of England, he succeeded, at the head of

a force gathered to him in the province of Dâlecarlia, in gaining the

most important places in the country, and was proclaimed king in

1523. He was not deeply interested in the religious controversy,

although he favored Lutheranism; but he made it his steady aim to break

down the clerical aristocracy, to weaken the nobles, and to organize a

strong and prosperous monarchy. He proceeded carefully: but the

peasants, who had been his warmest supporters, were strongly attached

to the old Church; and the opposition to his measures from all quarters

was such that at the _Diet of Westeräs_, in 1527, he took the bold

step of offering to lay down the crown. At this Diet he had assembled

representatives of the citizens and peasants, as well as the clergy and

nobles. He proposed to pay an enormous debt which was due to

_Lübeck_, by using the colossal wealth of the Church for this

purpose, and to shake off the monopoly of trade which the Hanse towns

enjoyed. Finding himself withstood, he renounced the throne. The

distraction and tumults which followed his act of relinquishing the

crown were such that a great party of the nobles joined him. Three days

after his abdication, he was recalled to the throne: the clergy

submitted abjectly, and the Church was no longer a power in the state,

or possessed of wealth. Trade was released from its bondage to

_Lübeck_ and the other towns; commerce was opened with foreign

countries; and a market was provided for _iron_, the main product

of the country. The nobles were held in subjection. The _Lutheran_

doctrine made very rapid progress, and became dominant.

ENGLAND: HENRY VIII. AND LUTHER.--In England, as in France, there were

earnest desires for church reform, partly aroused by such

serious-minded humanists as _Colet_, _More_, and

_Erasmus_. Even _Cardinal Wolsey_ sympathized with this

movement, and intended to endow colleges and bishoprics out of the

confiscated wealth of the more useless monasteries. What might have

been a slow development of religious thought was transformed by the

requirements of the king's own policy. Of all the _Tudor_ princes

none had a more obstinate and tyrannical will than _Henry

VIII_. The advantages derived from the effect of the civil wars,

which had reduced the strength and numbers of the nobility, and the

natural English jealousy, always shown, of foreign and papal supremacy,

enabled _Henry_ to break off the connection of England with

_Rome_; while, at the same time, he resisted Protestantism and

persecuted its adherents. Proud of his theological acquirements, he

appeared, in 1522, as an author against _Luther_, in a book in

defense of the _Seven Sacraments_, for which he received from the

Pope the title of _Defender of the Faith_. The vituperative

character of Luther's answer confirmed him in his hatred of the new

doctrine. "When God," said the blunt Saxon reformer, "wants a fool, he

turns a king into a theological writer."

THE DIVORCE QUESTION.--What made the breach between _Henry

VIII_. and the papacy was the question of the king's divorce. He had

been married in his twelfth year to _Catherine_ of Aragon, the

aunt of _Charles V_. and the widow of Henry's deceased brother

_Arthur_ (who had been married to her in 1501, when he was fifteen

years old, and had died the next year). A dispensation permitting the

marriage of Henry had been granted by Pope _Julius II_. How far

_Henry's_ passion for _Anne Boleyn_, whom he desired to wed,

was at the root of his scruples respecting the validity of his

marriage, it may not be easy to decide. His application to _Clement

VII_. for a separation reached the Pope after the Peace of

_Madrid_, when there was a desire to lessen the power of the

emperor. Cardinal _Wolsey_, the favorite counselor of

_Henry_, who himself aspired to the papal office, was obliged to

help on the cause of his imperious master. But whatever disposition

there was at _Rome_ to gratify _Henry_, there was no

inclination to hurry the proceedings. There were long delays in

England, whither a papal legate, _Campeggio_, had been sent to

investigate and determine the cause. In 1529 the legates decided that

the case must be determined at Rome. This the queen had before demanded

in vain. Aside from other objections to the divorce, _Clement

VII_. was now at peace with _Charles V_., whom it was

undesirable to offend. The incensed king took the matter into his own

hands. _Wolsey_, having been one of the legates, was deprived of

all his dignities: he was charged with treason, his strength melted

away on his fall from the heights of power, and he died a

broken-spirited man.

SEPARATION OF ENGLAND FROM ROME.--_Henry_ now gave free rein to

the spirit of opposition in Parliament to Rome. He took for his

principal minister, who became vicegerent in ecclesiastical affairs,

_Thomas Cromwell_. _Cromwell_, unlike _Wolsey_, was

hostile to the temporal power of Rome. He made _Thomas Cranmer_

Archbishop of Canterbury, who was inclined toward Protestant views,

but, though sincere in his beliefs, was a man of pliant temper,

indisposed to resist the king's will, preferring to bow to a storm, and

to wait for it to pass by. By _Cranmer_ the divorce was decreed,

but this was after the marriage with _Anne Boleyn_ had taken

place. _Henry_ was excommunicated by the Pope. Acts of Parliament

abolished the Pope's, and established the king's, supremacy in the

Church of England. In 1536 the cloisters were abolished. Their property

was confiscated, and fell to a large extent into the hands of the

nobles and the gentry. This measure bound them to the policy of the

sovereign. The mitered abbots were expelled from the House of Lords,

which left the preponderance of power with the lay nobles. The

hierarchy bowed to the will of the king.

THE TWO PARTIES.--There were two parties in England among the upholders

of the king's supremacy. There were the Protestants by conviction, who

were for spreading the new doctrine. This had already taken root and

spread in the universities, and in some other places in the

country. The new literary culture had paved the way for it. In the

North, there were still left many _Lollards_, disciples of

_Wickliffe_. _Cromwell, Cranmer_, and one of the bishops,

_Latimer_, were prominent leaders of this party. Against them were

the adherents of the Catholic theology, such as _Gardiner_,

_Tunstal_ of Durham, and other bishops. At first the king inclined

towards the first of these two parties. One of his most important acts

was the ordering of a translation of the Bible into English, a copy of

which was to be placed in every church. But a popular rebellion in 1536

was followed by a change of ecclesiastical policy. The _Six

Articles_ were passed, asserting the Roman Catholic doctrines, and

punishing those who denied transubstantiation with death. The queen,

_Anne Boleyn_, who was an adherent of the Protestant side, was

executed on the charge of infidelity to her marriage vows (1536). A few

years later _Cromwell_ was sent to the scaffold because the king

no longer approved of his policy and, seeing how unpopular he had

become, used him as a scapegoat (1540). Lutheran bishops were thrown

into the Tower: _Cranmer_ alone was shielded by the king's

personal favor, and by his own prudence. This system of a national

church, of which the king, and not the Pope, was the head, where the

doctrine was Roman Catholic, and the great ecclesiastical officers were

appointed, like civil officers, by the monarch, was the creation of

_Henry VIII_. His strong will was able to keep down the

conflicting parties. Despite his sensuality and cruelty, he was a

popular sovereign. One of his principal crimes was the execution of

_Sir Thomas More_ for refusing to take the oath of supremacy

because this contained an affirmation of the invalidity of the king's

marriage with _Catherine_. _More_ was one of the noblest men

in England, a man who combined vigor with gentleness. He was willing to

swear that the children of _Anne_ were lawful heirs to the throne,

because Parliament, he believed, could regulate the succession; but

this did not satisfy the tyrannical monarch. In the latter portion of

his reign he grew more suspicious, willful, and cruel.

Outlines of Universal History, Designed as a Text-book and for Private Reading · 第 2 / 15 章