ABSTRACT[48.1]

---- ---- TO FRIAR BRACKLEY (?).

[Sidenote: About 1440 (?)]

Touching a suit of Reynold Rowse against William Burgeys. This suit was

instituted originally for 5_s._ 4_d._ of rent; but when Rouse found he

could not prevail by right, he maliciously sued the other for trespass

in having fished his water, and driven him away by force. He afterwards

got him arrested for treachery upon an obligation (_i.e._, a bond).

Burgeys complained to Justice Paston, who counselled him not to plead;

‘For zyf thu do, he seyd, thu xalte hafe the werse, be thi case never so

trewe, for he is feid with my Lord of [N]orthfolke, and mech he is of he

[_sic_] counsel; and also, thu canst no man of lawe in Northfolke ne in

Sowthfolke to be with the azens hym; and, for [s]othe no more myth I

qwan I had a ple azens hym; and therfor myn counsel is, that thu make an

end qwat so ever the pay, for he xal elles on do the and brynge the to

nowte.’

[This letter is mutilated, and in part defaced. It is addressed on

the back-- ‘Be this take to Mayster Brele (?) of the Greye Freres.’

Although the name seems to be written Brele, it was probably

intended for Friar Brackley of Norwich, of whom we have several

letters of a later period. The date must be between the year 1429,

when William Paston was made a judge, and 1444, when he died; and as

the name of Reginald Rows occurs in Blomefield (_Hist. of Norfolk_,

ix. 441) ‘about 1440,’ this letter will probably not be far out of

its true place if inserted in that year.]

[Footnote 48.1: [From Paston MSS., B.M.]]

38

The Paston Letters, A.D. 1422-1509. Volume 2 (of 6) New Complete Library Edition · 第 62 / 426 题