ALL MANNER OF WITNESS

_This shall be to you a straight way, so that fools shall not go

astray in it_ (Isaias xxxv. 8).

Who is there, however small and lost in the crowd of

illiterates, that, with a desire of salvation and some little

attention, cannot see, cannot keep to the path of the Church, so

admirably smoothed out, eschewing brambles and rocks and

pathless wastes! For, as Isaias prophesies, this path shall be

plain even to the uneducated; most plain therefore, if you

choose, to you. Let us put before our eyes the theatre of the

universe: let us wander everywhere: all things supply us with an

argument. Let us go to heaven: let us contemplate roses and

lilies, Saints empurpled with martyrdom or white with innocence:

Roman Pontiffs, I say, three and thirty in a continuous line put

to death: Pastors all the world over, who have pledged their

blood for the name of Christ: Flocks of faithful, who have

followed in the footsteps of their Pastors: all the Saints of

heaven, who as shining lights in purity and holiness have gone

before the crowd of mankind. You will find that these were ours

when they lived on earth, ours when they passed away from this

world. To cull a few instances, ours was that Ignatius, who in

church matters put no one not even the Emperor, on a level with

the Bishop; who committed to writing, that they might not be

lost, certain Apostolic traditions of which he himself had been

witness. Ours was that anchoret Telesphorus, who ordered the

more strict observance of the fast of Lent established by the

Apostles. Ours was Irenaeus, who declared the Apostolic faith by

the Roman succession and chair (lib. iii. cap. 3). Ours was Pope

Victor, who by an edict brought to order the whole of Asia; and

though this proceeding seemed to some minds, and even to that

holy man Irenaeus, somewhat harsh, yet no one made light of it

as coming from a foreign power. Ours was Polycarp, who went to

Rome on the question of Easter, whose burnt relics Smyrna

gathered, and honoured her Bishop with an anniversary feast and

appointed ceremony. Ours were Cornelius and Cyprian, a golden

pair of Martyrs, both great Bishops, but greater he, the Roman,

who had rescinded the African error; while the latter was

ennobled by the obedience which he paid to the elder, his very

dear friend. Ours was Sixtus, to whom, as he offered solemn

sacrifice at the altar, seven men of the clergy ministered. Ours

was his Archdeacon Lawrence, whom the adversaries cast out of

their calendar, to whom, twelve hundred years ago, the Consular

man Prudentius thus prayed:

What is the power entrusted thee,

And how great function is given thee,

The joyful thanks of Roman citizens prove,

To whom thou grantest their petitions.

Among them, O glory of Christ,

Hear also a rustic poet,

Confessing the crimes of his heart

And publishing his doings.

Hear bountifully the supplication

Of Christ's culprit Prudentius.

Ours are those highly-blest maids, Cecily, Agatha, Anastasia,

Barbara, Agnes, Lucy, Dorothy, Catherine, who held fast against

the violent assault of men and devils the virginity they had

resolved upon. Ours was Helen, celebrated for the finding of the

Lord's Cross. Ours was Monica, who in death most piously begged

prayers and sacrifices to be offered for her at the altar of

Christ. Ours was Paula, who, leaving her City palace and her rich

estates, hastened on a long journey a pilgrim to the cave at

Bethlehem, to hide herself by the cradle of the Infant Christ.

Ours were Paul, Hilarion, Antony, those dear ancient solitaries.

Ours was Satyrus, own brother to Ambrose, who, when shipwrecked,

jumped into the ocean, carrying about his neck in a napkin the

Sacred Host, and full of faith swam to shore (_Ambrose, Orat.

fun. de Satyro_).

Ours are the Bishops Martin and Nicholas, exercised in watchings,

clad in the military garb of hair cloths, fed with fasts. Ours is

Benedict, father of so many monks. I should not run through their

thousands in ten years. But neither do I set down those whom I

mentioned before among the Doctors of the Church. I am mindful of

the brevity imposed upon me. Whoever wills, may seek these

further details, not only from the copious histories of the

ancients, but even much more from the grave authors who have

bequeathed to memory almost one man one Saint. Let the reader

report to me his judgment concerning those ancient blessed

Christians, to what doctrine they adhered, the Catholic or the

Lutheran. I call to witness the throne of God, and that Tribunal

at which I shall stand to render reason for these Reasons, of

everything I have said and done, that either there is no heaven

at all, or heaven belongs to our people. The former position we

abhor, we fix therefore upon the latter.

Now contrariwise, if you please, let us look into hell. There are

burnt with everlasting fire, who? The Jews. On what Church have

they turned their backs? On ours. Who again? The heathen. What

Church have they most cruelly persecuted? Ours. Who again? The

Turks. What temples have they destroyed? Ours. Who once more?

Heretics. Against what Church are they in rebellion? Against

ours. What Church but ours has opposed itself against all the

gates of hell? When, after the driving away of the Hebrews,

Christian inhabitants began to multiply at Jerusalem, what a

concourse of men there was to the Holy Places, what veneration

attached to the City, to the Sepulchre, to the Manger, to the

Cross, to all the memorials in which the Church delights as a

wife in what has been worn by her husband. Hence arose against us

the hatred of the Jews, cruel and implacable. Even now they

complain that our ancestors were the ruin of their ancestors.

From Simon Magus and the Lutherans they have received no wound.

Among the heathen, they were the most violent who, throughout the

Roman Empire, for three hundred years, at intervals of time,

contrived most painful punishments for Christians. What

Christians? The fathers and children of our faith. Learn the

language of the tyrant who roasted St. Lawrence on the gridiron:

That this is of your rites

The custom and practice, it has been handed down to memory:

This the discipline of the institution,

That priests pour libations from golden cups.

In silver goblets they say

That the sacred blood smokes;

And that in golden candlestick, at the nightly sacrifices,

There stand fixed waxen candles.

Then is it the chief care of the brethren,

As many-tongued report does testify,

To offer from the sale of estates,

Thousands of pence.

Ancestral property made over

To dishonest auctions,

The disinherited successor groans,

Needy child of holy parents.

These treasures are concealed in secret,

In corners of the churches;

And it is believed the height of piety

To strip your sweet children.

Bring out your treasures,

Which by evil arts of persuasion

You have heaped up and hold,

Which you shut up in darkling cave.

Public utility demands this,

The privy purse demands it, the treasury demands it,

That the soldiers may be paid for their services,

And the commander may benefit thereby.

This is your dogma, then:

Give every man his own.

Now Caesar recognises his own

Image, stamped on the coin.

What you know to be Caesar's, to Caesar

Give; surely what I ask is just.

If I am not mistaken, your Deity

Coins no money,

Nor when he came did he bring

Golden Jacobuses[3] with him;

But he gave his precepts in words,

Empty in point of pocket.

Fulfil the promise of the words

Which you sell the round world over.

Give up your hard cash willingly,

Be rich in words.

(_Prudentius, Hymn on St. Lawrence_).

Whom does this speaker resemble. Against whom does he rage? What

Church is it whose sacred vessels, lamps, and ornaments he is

pillaging, whose ritual he overthrows? Whose golden patens and

silver chalices, sumptuous votive offerings and rich treasure,

does he envy? Why, the man is a Lutheran all over. With what

other cloak did our Nimrods[4] cover their brigandage, when they

embezzled the money of their Churches and wasted the patrimony of

Christ? Take on the contrary Constantine the Great, that scourge

of the persecutors of Christ, to what Church did he restore

tranquillity? To that Church over which Pope Silvester presided,

whom he summoned from his hiding-place on Mount Soracte that by

his ministry he might receive our baptism. Under what auspices

was he victorious? Under the sign of the cross. Of what mother

was he the glorious son? Of Helen. To what Fathers did he attach

himself? To the Fathers of Nice. What manner of men were they?

Such men as Silvester, Mark, Julius, Athanasius, Nicholas. What

seat did he ask for in the Synod? The last. Oh how much more

kingly was he on that seat than the Kings who have ambitioned a

title not due to them! It would be tedious to go into further

details. But from these two [Emperors, Decius and Constantine],

the one our deadly enemy, the other our warm friend, it may be

left to the reader's conjecture to fix on points of closest

resemblance to the one and to the other in the history of our own

times. For as it was our cause that went through its agony under

Decius, so our cause it was that came out triumphant under

Constantine.[5]

Let us look at the doings of the Turks. Mahomet and the apostate

monk Sergius lie in the deep abyss, howling, laden with their own

crimes and with those of their posterity. This portentous and

savage monster, the power of the Saracens and the Turks, had it

not been clipped and checked by our Military Orders, our Princes

and Peoples,--so far as Luther was concerned (to whom Solyman the

Turk is said to have written a letter of thanks on this account),

and so far as the Lutheran Princes were concerned (by whom the

progress of the Turks is reckoned matter of joy),--this frantic

and man-destroying Fury, I say, by this time would be

depopulating and devastating all Europe, overturning altars and

signs of the cross as zealously as Calvin himself. Ours therefore

they are, our proper foes, seeing that by the industry of our

champions it was that their fangs were unfastened from the

throats of Christians.

Let us look down on heretics, the filth and fans and fuel of

hell[6] the first that meets our gaze is Simon Magus. What did he

do? He endeavoured to snatch away free will from man: he prated

of faith alone (Clen. lib. i. recog.; Iren. l. 1, c. 2). After

him, Novatian. Who was he? An Anti-pope, rival to the Roman

Pontiff Cornelius, an enemy of the Sacraments, of Penance and

Chrism. Then Manes the Persian. He taught that baptism did not

confer salvation. After him the Arian Aerius. He condemned

prayers for the dead: he confounded priests with bishops, and was

surnamed "the atheist" no less than Lucian. There follows

Vigilantius, who would not have the Saints prayed to; and

Jovinian, who put marriage on a level with virginity; finally, a

whole mess of nastiness, Macedonius, Pelagius, Nestorius,

Eutyches, the Monothelites, the Iconoclasts, to whom posterity

will aggregate Luther and Calvin. What of them? All black

crows,[7] born of the same egg, they revolted from the Prelates

of our Church, and by, them were rejected and made void.

Let us leave the lower regions and return to earth. Wherever I

cast my eyes and turn my thoughts, whether I regard the

Patriarchates and the Apostolic Sees, or the Bishops of other

lands, or meritorious Princes, Kings, and Emperors, or the origin

of Christianity in any nation, or any evidence of antiquity, or

light of reason, or beauty of virtue, all things serve and

support our faith. I call to witness the Roman Succession, _in

which Church_, to speak with Augustine (_Ep_. 162: _Doctr.

Christ_. ii. 8), _the Primacy of the Apostolic Chair has ever

flourished_. I call to witness those other Apostolic Sees, to

which this name eminently belongs, because they were erected by

the Apostles themselves, or by their immediate disciples. I call

to witness the Pastors of the nations, separate in place, but

united in our religion: Ignatius and Chrysostom at Antioch;

Peter, Alexander, Athanasius, Theophilus, at Alexandria; Macarius

and Cyril at Jerusalem; Proclus at Constantinople; Gregory and

Basil in Cappadocia; Thaumaturgus in Pontus; at Smyrna Polycarp;

Justin at Athens; Dionysius at Corinth; Gregory at Nyssa;

Methodius at Tyre; Ephrem in Syria; Cyprian, Optatus, Augustine,

in Africa; Epiphanius in Cyprus; Andrew in Crete; Ambrose,

Paulinus, Gaudentius, Prosper, Faustus, Vigilius, in Italy;

Irenaeus, Martin, Hilary, Eucherius, Gregory, Salvianus, in Gaul;

Vincentus, Orosius, Ildephonsus, Leander, Isidore, in Spain; in

Britain, Fugatius, Damian, Justus, Mellitus, Bede. Finally, not

to appear to be making a vain display of names, whatever works,

or fragments of works, are still extant of those who sowed the

Gospel seed in distant lands, all exhibit to us one faith, that

which we Catholics profess to-day. O Christ, what cause can I

allege to Thee why Thou shouldst not banish me from Thine own, if

to so many lights of the Church I should have preferred

mannikins, dwellers in darkness, few, unlearned, split into

sects, and of bad moral character!

I call to witness likewise Princes, Kings, Emperors, and their

Commonwealths, whose own piety, and the people of their realms,

and their established discipline in war and peace, were

altogether founded on this our Catholic doctrine. What

Theodosiuses here might I summon from the East, what Charleses

from the West, what Edwards from England, what Louises from

France, what Hermenegilds from Spain, Henries from Saxony,

Wenceslauses from Bohemia, Leopolds from Austria, Stephens from

Hungary, Josaphats from India, Dukes and Counts from all the

world over, who by example, by arms, by laws, by loving care, by

outlay of money, have nourished our Church! For so Isaias

foretold: _Kings shall be thy foster-fathers, and queens thy

nurses_ (Isaias xlix. 23).

Listen, Elizabeth, most powerful Queen, for thee this great

prophet utters this prophecy, and therein teaches thee thy part. I

tell thee: one and the same heaven cannot hold Calvin and the

Princes whom I have named. With these Princes then associate

thyself, and so make thee worthy of thy ancestors, worthy of thy

genius, worthy of thy excellence in letters, worthy of thy

praises, worthy of thy fortune. To this effect alone do I labour

about thy person, and will labour, whatever shall become of me,

for whom these adversaries so often augur the gallows, as though I

were an enemy of thy life. Hail, good Cross. There will come,

Elizabeth, the day, that day which will show thee clearly which

have loved thee, the Society of Jesus or the offspring of Luther.

I proceed. I call to witness all the coasts and regions of the

world, to which the Gospel trumpet has sounded since the birth of

Christ. Was this a little thing, to close the mouth of idols and

carry the kingdom of God to the nations? Of Christ Luther speaks:

we Catholics speak of Christ. _Is Christ divided?_ (1 Cor. i.

13). By no means. Either we speak of a false Christ or he does.

What then? I will say. Let Him be Christ, and belong to them, at

whose coming in Dagon broke his neck. Our Christ was pleased to

use the services of our men, when He banished from the hearts of

so many peoples--Jupiters, Mercuries, Dianas, Phoebades, and that

black night and sad Erebus of ages. There is no leisure to search

afar off, let us examine only neighbouring and domestic history.

The Irish imbibed from Patrick, the Scots from Palladius, the

English from Augustine, men consecrated at Rome, sent from Rome,

venerating Rome, either no faith at all or assuredly our faith,

the Catholic faith. The case is clear. I hurry on.

Witness Universities, witness tables of laws, witness the

domestic habits of men, witness the election and inauguration of

Emperors, witness the coronation rites and anointing of Kings,

witness the Orders of Knighthood and their very mantles, witness

windows, witness coins, witness city gates and city houses,

witness the labours and life of our ancestors, witness all things

great and small, that no religion in the world but ours ever took

deep root there.

These considerations being at hand to me, and so affecting me as

I thought them over that it seemed the part of insolence, nay of

insanity, to renounce all this Christian company and consort

with the most abandoned of men, I confess, I felt animated and

fired to the conflict, a conflict wherein I can never be worsted

until it comes to the Saints being hurled from heaven and the

proud Lucifer recovering heaven. Therefore let Chark, who

reviles me so outrageously, be in better conceit with me, if I

have preferred to trust this poor sinful soul of mine, which

Christ has bought so dearly, rather to a safe way, a sure way, a

royal road, than to Calvin's rocks or woodland thickets, there

to hang caught in uncertainty.

Ten Reasons Proposed to His Adversaries for Disputation in the Name of the Faith and Presented to the Illustrious Members of Our Universities · 第 68 / 70 题