PAUL HAMILTON.

After some conversation as to the proper course for this business

to take, it was referred to a select committee, to consist of seven

members, to consider and report thereon.

Mr. QUINCY, Mr. RANDOLPH, Mr. ROANE, Mr. LACOCK, Mr. TROUP, Mr. EMOTT,

and Mr. DINSMOOR, were appointed the committee.

MONDAY, December 28.

_Public Lands--Cash System and Reduction of

Price._

The House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole on the report

of the Committee on the Public Lands, made on the second instant,

respecting an extension of the time limited by law for the payment of

lands purchased of the United States.

The report concludes with the following resolutions, the adoption of

which the committee recommend:

"_Resolved_, That such part of the laws for the sale of public

lands as allow a credit on part of the purchase money, be

repealed; and that the price at which lands shall be offered in

future shall be one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre.

"_Resolved_, That in future sales a portion of the public lands

be offered in tracts of eighty acres.

"_Resolved_, That two years be given in addition to the time

allowed by law to the purchasers of public lands, whose time

of payment shall have or may expire on or before the first day

of January, 1814, on condition that all the interest that has

accrued or may accrue on or before the 18th day of March next,

shall be paid at that day, and the interest that may become

due thereafter shall be paid at the day on which the time,

according to existing laws, shall expire for making payment."

Considerable desultory debate took place on these propositions; but the

committee rose without coming to any decision thereon, and obtained

leave to sit again.

TUESDAY, December 29.

_Additional Military Force._

The House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole on the bill

"supplementary to the act for the more perfect organization of the Army

of the United States," and on the bill "in addition to the act for

raising an additional military force."

The bills having been read through, a motion was made by Mr. DAVID

R. WILLIAMS to fill the blanks in the first bill, for the amount of

bounty, &c., and the question having been stated--

Mr. D. R. WILLIAMS said, the embarrassment which he felt on the present

occasion, was not of an ordinary kind; he was so solemnly impressed

with the importance of the subject before the committee, he was fearful

its success might, in some degree, depend on his efforts to sustain it;

and, feeling that the interest, perhaps the character of his country,

might be committed by the decision, he was humbled that its cause could

not by him be more ably supported. He felt, however, some confidence

from the circumstance that the Military Committee was entitled to the

candor of the House, because it had not presented mere fragments,

to be acted on in detail, but a system on which to rest the future

prosecution of the war. An explanation of its merits, from the relation

in which he stood to that committee, was probably expected of him.

Without going back to the unavoidable and just causes of the war in

which we were engaged, he would presume it was the object of all to

terminate it successfully, and that there now remained no other mode

than to call into the field a force adequate to the command of every

honorable object. The force was abundant throughout the community, to

secure, if directed with skill, spirit, and enterprise, our defence

everywhere; and, by offence, to make the enemy feel it had become his

interest to abstain from plunder and oppression.

The character of our Government had been so depressed in Europe, not

more by foreign than domestic misrepresentation, as much even within

these walls as without them, it had become necessary to make war to

place our backs against the wall and prove to European marauders

there is a point beyond which we will not recede. This good the war

has accomplished; but it has become more than ever necessary to prove

that we will not only declare war, but can prosecute it with energy

and courageous enterprise. The honor, the character of the nation,

require that the British power on our borders shall be demolished in

the next campaign--her American provinces once wrested from her, every

attempt to recover them will be chimerical, except through negotiation.

The road to peace then lies through Canada. When we shall once be in

possession of it, peace, honorable peace, the sole object of us all, is

secured. But some gentlemen affect a sympathy for the Canadians--why,

say they, will you make war on them? They have not injured us. Nor,

sir, has the British tar injured us, although he is the instrument of

plunder and impressment. It is to conquer the sovereignty of the soil,

to raze the British power, to reach, by such means, her profligate and

unjust ministry, that war is waged at all--the unarmed will never fall

on American bayonets; it is not against the people of either Canada or

Great Britain, but against the English subject in arms, that the war is

directed. By physical force then alone can we proceed.

Having shown the necessity of augmenting the regular forces, it was

equally material to provide for filling the ranks, and for keeping

them at their full complement when filled. With this view was the 1st

section introduced. The greatest evil, incident to the recruiting

service, results from the number of persons to whom the public money

was necessarily distributed; in proportion to the number of persons

with whom it is intrusted, will be its misapplication. To remedy

this it is proposed to appoint officers to each regiment, for that

particular purpose, in no way different from those already appointed,

who shall be employed in recruiting for their respective regiments;

these to be under the order of a major, who shall receive and be

accountable for the issue of money and clothes for that service.

The ranks filled, the presence of all the officers on the present

establishment will be indispensable, as in our service the proportion

of privates to the officers is greater than in any other service

whatever. The new organization which was given to the Army at the last

session increased the number of privates in each company, without a

corresponding increase of officers. If two lieutenants were necessary

in a company, for the purpose of discipline and recruiting, when it

consisted of only sixty-four privates, assuredly three are as much so

now it is raised to ninety. The recruits, as fast as they are enlisted,

may be concentrated under the eye of the major, where they may be

exercised and drilled, so that when he joins the regiment, they will be

qualified to enter the ranks and face the enemy.

One other objection he could anticipate--perhaps those who can sneer

at the disasters and misfortunes of the late campaign may object that

there is no encouragement to vote additional forces, seeing those which

have been already raised have been so illy employed. It becomes us all

to be equally faithful to our country, whether her arms are victorious

or not; it is in times of discomfiture that the patriot's resolution

and virtues are most needed. It is no matter by what party names we

are distinguished; this is our country--we are children of the same

family, and ought to be brothers in a common cause. The misfortune

which befalls one portion, should sink deep in the hearts of the others

also. What misfortune so great as the loss of character? If we shall

forget our impatience under disgrace, and look back on the events that

have passed, with only as much candor as becomes us, this objection

must vanish. Under the circumstances in which it found itself, without

experience, either in itself or others to guide it, Administration

ought not to be censured for the bad military appointments it may have

made, however much it may deserve, if it shall retain men in employ,

when found incapable to discharge the duties intrusted to him. He

was fearless of contradiction in declaring, all our disasters sprung

from a cause which no man in the nation could have anticipated. It

was next to impossible any human being could have foreseen, much less

provided against it. It was with pain and reluctance he felt it his

duty to speak of an officer fallen and disgraced; he wished he could

discover any cause for the surrender of Detroit, less heinous than

treachery or cowardice--between them he saw nothing to choose. Justice

will hereafter, if party heat denies it now, pronounce the plan of the

campaign, as intrusted to General Hull, easy to be accomplished and

judicious in its objects. The commandant was furnished with every means

necessary for success--with money, men, provisions, and munitions of

war, in abundance. What better mode could have been adopted, to prevent

Indian hostility and intercept British supplies of the instruments of

massacre? That your army had not been protected beyond the point with

which communications could have been maintained, is evident from the

events which followed. What was there to mar success? The commandant

at Maiden needed only an apology to surrender! What if the other Hull

had commanded? Every thing would have fallen before him--great science

was not necessary; courage and faithfulness would have accomplished

every thing. A train of heavy artillery was not required to batter a

breach for the assault; it was not necessary to fire a single gun--not

a cartridge need have been expended--the bayonet alone was adequate

to have taken Maiden at any hour from the moment the American army

crossed into Canada, till its most shameful retreat. The fort was not

enclosed--one entire side was open to assault. Yes, sir, had the brave

Hull, who bore your "thunder on the mountain wave," directed the valor

of the army, he would have poured the storm of victory resistless on

the foe. This black deed, without a battle, was consummated in the

_solicitous_ surrender of the brave corps which were hastening to his

relief; these, too, were arrested and thrown back on the community,

leaving the whole Western frontier exposed to savage inroad. Hence

all our misfortunes! After this, will it be contended that the

accidental appointment of an improper agent shall cause a refusal of

the force necessary to drag our drowned honor up from the ocean of

infamy into which it has been plunged? Impossible! Economy of life and

treasure call for a vigorous campaign--away with lifeless expedients;

miserable inertness must be banished--zeal and energy must be infused

everywhere. One protracted campaign will cost twenty-fold more than the

expenditure now asked for. Let this be the signal for resolution--the

first evidence of energetic policy. Let us suppose ourselves leading

the forlorn hope, and assume the spirit and vigor characteristic

of such an enterprise--the army will feel it--the people will feel

it--disaster and disgrace will then disappear. It is to save the public

treasure--the people's blood; it is for the reclamation of character,

I ask for high bounties and premiums; and, so asking, I hope not to be

denied.

The question was then taken on filling the several blanks in the first

bill, and carried.

Mr. H. CLAY congratulated the committee and the nation on the system

which had been presented to their consideration, and the prospect

of prosecuting the next campaign with a vigor which should insure

a successful result. He rose at this time, however, to propose an

amendment to the bill, the object of which was to repeal so much

of former laws as authorizes a bounty of land to the recruits. He

was satisfied that, as respected the nation, this was a waste of

its capital, without producing a single provident result. As to the

recruiting service, he was convinced, from what he had heard, that it

added scarcely any inducement to the recruit--that it had not added

a hundred men to the army. He confessed he had been much mistaken as

to the effect it had been expected to produce, &c. Mr. C. added many

remarks going to support his positions, stating, among other things,

that the land would in the end get into the hands of speculators, and

the individuals for whose benefit it was intended would derive no

advantage from it. Now that it was proposed to increase the bounty in

money, he thought it would be a proper occasion to repeal so much of

the existing laws as allowed a bounty in land, on which the recruits

set generally as much value as if it were located in the moon. Mr. C.

concluded by making a motion to that effect.

Mr. TROUP and Mr. BIBB stated objections to the motion, as going

to withdraw what was certainly, in many parts of the country, an

inducement to enlistments, at a time when every means ought to be

called into action for the purpose of filling the ranks of the army.

Mr. CLAY'S motion was then agreed to by the committee.

The other bill before the committee, going to authorize the raising an

additional force of twenty thousand men for one year, was then taken

up, and the blanks therein severally filled.

Mr. PITKIN, adverting to the provision of the bill which gives the

appointment of officers below the rank of colonel to the President

alone, inquired the reasons why, contrary to the general usage, the

Senate were precluded from concurrence in these appointments?

Mr. WILLIAMS stated that the motive of the committee in proposing this

provision was, to avoid the delay incidental to the minor appointments,

which could be much more easily and effectually made by the colonels of

the regiments, respectively, who would be personally acquainted with,

and responsible for, the good conduct of those who were appointed.

Mr. TALLMADGE moved to strike out the section of the bill which directs

the manner in which the company officers shall be appointed. He said

he had hoped that the committee would have risen and given at least

one day for consideration; that they would have maturely weighed and

deliberately made up their minds on this question. It is true that, in

1798, there was a power given to the President of the United States

to appoint all officers for ten thousand men under the rank of field

officers; but the appointment of all field officers was retained to

the President and Senate. Mr. T. said he knew how perfectly easy it

was to go on step by step, and yield power till it all passed out of

our hands. The argument now is a plea of urgency. What was the case in

1798? Not the same as now. Congress had been making preparations on the

contingency of war. The language of the law which has been referred to

is to this effect: in case of war being declared by any foreign power,

or the country actually invaded, then the President shall have the

power of appointing these officers. Such a provision was very different

from that now proposed. Mr. T. was also opposed to this section in the

bill, because he would not pass a bill going, as far as in the power

of this House, to take away the power of appointment from the Senate.

It was a disrespect he would not offer to them, to call upon them

to ratify a law depriving themselves of a power they have uniformly

possessed and exercised.

The question was taken on Mr. TALLMADGE'S motion to strike out the

section, and lost.

The committee rose and reported the two bills and the House adjourned.

WEDNESDAY, December 30.

_Additional Military Force._

The question was then taken on engrossment of the bill for a third

reading, and passed in the affirmative--yeas 70, nays 37, as follows:

YEAS.--Willis Alston, jr., Stevenson Archer, Daniel Avery,

Ezekiel Bacon, David Bard, William Barnett, Burwell Bassett,

William W. Bibb, William Blackledge, Robert Brown, William A.

Burwell, William Butler, John C. Calhoun, Francis Carr, Langdon

Cheves, Matthew Clay, James Cochran, John Clopton, William

Crawford, Richard Cutts, Roger Davis, Joseph Desha, Samuel

Dinsmoor, Elias Earle, William Findlay, James Fisk, Meshack

Franklin, Charles Goldsborough, Isaiah L. Green, Felix Grundy,

Bolling Hall, Obed Hall, John A. Harper, Aylett Hawes, John

M. Hyneman, Joseph Kent, William R. King, Abner Lacock, Peter

Little, Aaron Lyle, Nathaniel Macon, Thomas Moore, William

McCoy, Samuel McKee, Samuel L. Mitchill, Jeremiah Morrow,

Anthony New, Thomas Newton, Stephen Ormsby, Israel Pickens,

James Pleasants, jr., Benjamin Pond, William M. Richardson,

Thomas B. Robertson, John Rhea, John Roane, Jonathan Roberts,

Ebenezer Sage, Thos. Sammons, John Sevier, Adam Seybert, George

Smith, John Taliaferro, Uri Tracy, George M. Troup, Charles

Turner, jr., Robert Whitehill, David R. Williams, William

Widgery, and Richard Wynn.

NAYS.--John Baker, Abijah Bigelow, Harmanus Bleecker, Adam

Boyd, James Breckenridge, Elijah Brigham, Epaphroditus

Champion, Martin Chittenden, John Davenport, jr., William Ely,

James Emott, Thos. R. Gold, Edwin Gray, Jacob Hufty, Richard

Jackson, jr., Lyman Law, Joseph, Lewis, jr., George C. Maxwell,

Archibald McBryde, Jonathan O. Mosely, Thos. Newbold, Joseph

Pearson, Timothy Pitkin, jr., Elisha R. Potter, Josiah Quincy,

John Randolph, William Reed, Henry M. Ridgely, William Rodman,

Daniel Sheffey, Richard Stanford, Lewis B. Sturges, Samuel

Taggart, Benjamin Tallmadge, Laban Wheaton, Leonard White, and

Thomas Wilson.

So the bill was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading.

The House then proceeded to the consideration of the report of the

Committee of the Whole on the other bill reported by the committee,

entitled "A bill in addition to the act to raise an additional military

force, and for other purposes"--the first section of which is as

follows:

_Be it enacted, &c._, That, in addition to the present Military

Establishment of the United States, there be raised twenty

regiments of infantry, to be enlisted for the term of one year,

unless sooner discharged.

[The remainder of the bill is mere detail; the bounty on enlistment

sixteen dollars.]

Mr. GOLD said this was a bill involving questions of great importance,

as well in principle as in its details. There was one feature

especially of the bill which required mature consideration; he alluded

to the limited period of service of the proposed additional force.

There was no pressing emergency to hurry the bill; and he, therefore,

moved to postpone the further consideration of it to Monday, which was

negatived.

_Death of Mr. Smilie._

Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856, Vol. 4 (of 16) · 第 254 / 377 题