CHAPTER II.

ROUSSEAU'S _CONTRAT SOCIAL_ WAS NOT THE SOURCE OF THIS DECLARATION.

In his _History of Political Science_--the most comprehensive work of

that kind which France possesses--Paul Janet, after a thorough

presentation of the _Contrat Social_, discusses the influence which this

work of Rousseau's exercised upon the Revolution. The idea of the

declaration of rights is to be traced back to Rousseau's teachings. What

else is the declaration itself than the formulation of the state

contract according to Rousseau's ideas? And what are the several rights

but the stipulations and specifications of that contract?[7]

It is hard to understand how an authority upon the _Contrat Social_

could make such a statement though in accord with popular opinion.

The social contract has only one stipulation, namely, the complete

transference to the community of all the individual's rights.[8] The

individual does not retain one particle of his rights from the moment he

enters the state.[9] Everything that he receives of the nature of right

he gets from the _volonte generale_, which is the sole judge of its own

limits, and ought not to be, and cannot be, restricted by the law of any

power. Even property belongs to the individual only by virtue of state

concession. The social contract makes the state the master of the goods

of its members,[10] and the latter remain in possession only as the

trustees of public property.[11] Civil liberty consists simply of what

is left to the individual after taking his duties as a citizen into

account.[12] These duties can only be imposed by law, and according to

the social contract the laws must be the same for all citizens. This is

the only restriction upon the sovereign power,[13] but it is a

restriction which follows from the very nature of that power, and it

carries in itself its own guarantees.[14]

The conception of an original right, which man brings with him into

society and which appears as a restriction upon the rights of the

sovereign, is specifically rejected by Rousseau. There is no fundamental

law which can be binding upon the whole people, not even the social

contract itself.[15]

The Declaration of Rights, however, would draw dividing lines between

the state and the individual, which the lawmaker should ever keep before

his eyes as the limits that have been set him once and for all by "the

natural, inalienable and sacred rights of man."[16]

The principles of the _Contrat Social_ are accordingly at enmity with

every declaration of rights. For from these principles there ensues not

the right of the individual, but the omnipotence of the common will,

unrestricted by law. Taine comprehended better than Janet the

consequences of the _Contrat Social_.[17]

The Declaration of August 26, 1789, originated in opposition to the

_Contrat Social_. The ideas of the latter work exercised, indeed, a

certain influence upon the style of some clauses of the Declaration, but

the conception of the Declaration itself must have come from some other

source.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 7: "Est-il necessaire de prouver, qu'un tel acte ne vient

point de Montesquieu, mais de J.-J. Rousseau?... Mais l'acte meme de la

declaration est-il autre chose que le contrat passe entre tous les

membres de la communaute, selon les idees de Rousseau? N'est ce pas

l'enonciation des clauses et des conditions de ce contrat?"--_Histoire

de la science politique, 3me ed._, pp. 457, 458.]

[Footnote 8: "Ces clauses, bien entendues, se reduisent toutes a une

seule: savoir l'alienation totale de chaque associe avec tous ses droits

a toute la communaute."--_Du contrat social_, I, 6.]

[Footnote 9: "De plus, l'alienation se faisant sans reserve, l'union est

aussi parfaite qu'elle peut l'etre et nul associe n'a plus rien a

reclamer." I, 6.]

[Footnote 10: "Car l'Etat, a l'egard de ses membres, est maitre de tous

leurs biens par le contrat social." I, 9.]

[Footnote 11: "... Les possesseurs etant consideres comme depositaires

du bien public." I, 9.]

[Footnote 12: "On convient que tout ce que chacun aliene, par le pacte

social, de sa puissance, de ses biens, de sa liberte, c'est seulement la

partie de tout cela dont l'usage importe a la communaute; mais il faut

convenir aussi que le souverain seul est juge de cette importance." II,

4.]

[Footnote 13: "Ainsi, par la nature du pacte, tout acte de souverainete,

c'est-a-dire toute acte authentique de la volonte generale, oblige ou

favorise egalement tous les citoyens." II, 4.]

[Footnote 14: "La puissance souverain n'a nul besoin de garant envers

les sujets." I, 7.]

[Footnote 15: "Il est contre la nature du corps politique que le

souverain s'impose une loi qu'il ne puisse enfreindre ... il n'y a ni ne

peut y avoir nulle espece de loi fundamentale obligatoire pour le corps

du peuple, pas meme le contrat social." I, 7.]

[Footnote 16: Constitution du 3 septembre 1791, titre premier: "Le

pouvoir legislatif ne pourra faire aucune loi qui porte atteinte et

mette obstacle a l'exercise de droits naturels et civils consignes dans

le present titre, et garantis par la constitution."]

[Footnote 17: _Cf._ Taine, _loc. cit._: _L'ancien regime_, pp. 321 _et

seq._]

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizens · 第 2 / 9 章