To talk in the language of music, each passion hath a certain tone, to

which every sentiment proceeding from it ought to be tuned with the

greatest accuracy. This is no easy work, especially where such harmony

is to be supported during the course of a long theatrical

representation. In order to reach such delicacy of execution, it is

necessary that a writer assume the precise character and passion of the

personage represented. This requires an uncommon genius. But it is the

only difficulty; for the writer, who, forgetting himself, can thus

personate another, so as to feel truly and distinctly the various

agitations of the passion, need be in no pain about the sentiments:

these will flow without the least study, or even preconception; and will

frequently be as delightfully new to himself as afterward to his reader.

But if a lively picture even of a single emotion require an effort of

genius; how much greater must the effort be, to compose a passionate

dialogue, in which there are as many different tones of passion as there

are speakers? With what ductility of feeling ought a writer to be

endued who aims at perfection in such a work; when, to execute it

correctly, it is necessary to assume different and even opposite

characters and passions, in the quickest succession? And yet this work,

difficult as it is, yields to that of composing a dialogue in genteel

comedy devoid of passion; where the sentiments must be tuned to the

nicer and more delicate tones of different characters. That the latter

is the more difficult task, appears from considering, that a character

is greatly more complex than a passion, and that passions are more

distinguishable from each other than characters are. Many writers

accordingly who have no genius for characters, make a shift to

represent, tolerably well, an ordinary passion in its plain movements.

But of all works of this kind, what is truly the most difficult, is a

characteristical dialogue upon any philosophical subject. To interweave

characters with reasoning, by adapting to the peculiar character of each

speaker a peculiarity not only of thought but of expression, requires

the perfection of genius, taste, and judgement.

How hard dialogue-writing is, will be evident, even without reasoning,

from the imperfect compositions of this kind found without number in all

languages. The art of mimicking any singularity in voice or gesture, is

a rare talent, though directed by sight and hearing, the acutest and

most lively of our external senses: how much more rare must the talent

be of imitating characters and internal emotions, tracing all their

different tints, and representing them in a lively manner by natural

sentiments properly expressed? The truth is, such execution is too

delicate for an ordinary genius; and for that reason, the bulk of

writers, instead of expressing a passion like one who is under its

power, content themselves with describing it like a spectator. To awake

passion by an internal effort merely, without any external cause,

requires great sensibility; and yet this operation is necessary not less

to the writer than to the actor; because none but they who actually feel

a passion, can represent it to the life. The writer’s part is much more

complicated: he must join composition with action; and, in the quickest

succession, be able to adopt every different character introduced in his

work. But a very humble flight of imagination, may serve to convert a

writer into a spectator, so as to figure, in some obscure manner, an

action as passing in his sight and hearing. In this figured situation,

he is led naturally to describe as a spectator, and at second hand to

entertain his readers with his own observations, with cool description

and florid declamation; instead of making them eye-witnesses, as it

were, to a real event, and to every movement of genuine passion[48].

Thus, in the bulk of plays, a tiresome monotony prevails, a pompous

declamatory style, without entering into different characters or

passions.

This descriptive manner of expressing passion, has a very unhappy

effect. Our sympathy is not raised by description: we must be lulled

first into a dream of reality; and every thing must appear as actually

present and passing in our sight[49]. Unhappy is the player of genius

who acts a capital part in what may be termed a _descriptive tragedy_.

After he has assumed the very passion that is to be represented, how

must he be cramped in his action, when he is forced to utter, not the

sentiments of the passion he feels, but a cold description in the

language of a by-stander? It is this imperfection, I am persuaded, in

the bulk of our plays, that confines our stage almost entirely to

Shakespear, his many irregularities notwithstanding. In our latest

English tragedies, we sometimes find sentiments tolerably well adapted

to a plain passion. But it would be fruitless labour, to search in any

of them for a sentiment expressive of character; and, upon that very

account, all our modern performances of the dramatic kind, are

intolerably insipid.

Looking back upon the foregoing observation, I am uncertain whether it

will be sufficiently apprehended; for, upon this complicated subject, I

find some difficulty to express myself with perspicuity. I despair not

however to place this matter in the clearest light, by adding example to

precept. In the front shall be set one or two examples of sentiments

that appear the legitimate offspring of passion; and to them shall be

opposed a few others that are descriptive only, and illegitimate. In

making this comparison, I shall borrow my instances from Shakespear and

Corneille, who for genius in dramatic composition stand uppermost in the

rolls of fame.

* * * * *

Shakespear shall furnish the first instance, being of sentiments

dictated by a violent and perturbed passion.

_Lear._----Filial ingratitude!

Is it not, as if this mouth should tear this hand

For lifting food to’t?--But I’ll punish home;

No, I will weep no more.---- In such a night,

To shut me out!---- Pour on, I will endure.

In such a night as this! O Regan, Gonerill,

Your old kind father, whose frank heart gave all--

O, that way madness lies; let me shun that;

No more of that.----

_Kent._ Good, my Lord, enter here.

_Lear._ Pr’ythee, go in thy thyself, seek thine own ease,

This tempest will not give me leave to ponder

On things would hurt me more--but I’ll go in;

In, boy, go first. You houseless poverty----

Nay, get thee in; I’ll pray, and then I’ll sleep--

Poor naked wretches, wheresoe’er you are,

That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm!

How shall your houseless heads and unfed sides,

Your loop’d and window’d raggedness, defend you

From seasons such as these?---- O I have ta’en

Too little care of this! take physic, Pomp;

Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel,

That thou may’st shake the superflux to them,

And show the heavens more just.

_King Lear. act 3. sc 5._

To illustrate the foregoing doctrine, one other instance of the same

kind may suffice, expressing sentiments arising from remorse and

despair.

_Othello._ Lo! I have a weapon:

A better never did itself sustain

Upon a soldier’s thigh. I’ve seen the day,

That with this little arm, and this good sword,

I’ve made my way through more impediments

Than twenty times your stop. But, oh vain boast!

Who can controul his fate? ’tis not so now.

Be not afraid, though you do see me weapon’d;

Here is my journey’s end, here is my butt,

The very sea mark of my outmost sail.

Do you go back dismay’d? ’tis a lost fear.

Man but a rush against Othello’s breast,

And he retires. Where should Othello go?

Now---- how dost thou look now? Oh ill starr’d wench!

Pale as thy smoke! when we shall meet at compt,

This look of thine will hurl my soul from heav’n,

And fiends will snatch at it. Cold, cold, my girl,

Ev’n like thy chastity. O cursed slave!

Whip me, ye devils,

From the possession of this heav’nly sight;

Blow me about in winds, roast me in sulphur,

Wash me in steep-down gulfs of liquid fire----

Oh, Desdemona! Desdemona! dead! dead! oh, oh!

_Othello, act 5. sc. 9._

The sentiments here display’d flow so naturally from the passions

represented, and are such genuine expressions of these passions, that it

is not possible to conceive any imitation more perfect.

* * * * *

With regard to the French author, truth obliges me to acknowledge, that

he describes in the style of a spectator, instead of expressing passion

like one who feels it; and also that he is thereby betray’d into the

other faults above mentioned, a tiresome monotony, and a pompous

declamatory style[50]. It is scarce necessary to produce particular

instances; for he never varies from this tone. I shall however take two

passages at a venture, in order to be confronted with those transcribed

above. In the tragedy of _Cinna_, Æmilia, after the conspiracy was

discovered, having nothing in view but racks and death to herself and

her lover, receives a pardon from Augustus, attended with the brightest

circumstances of magnanimity and tenderness. This is a happy situation

for representing the passions of surprise and gratitude in their

different stages. These passions, raised at once to the utmost pitch,

are at first too big for utterance; and Æmilia’s feelings must, for some

moments, have been expressed by violent gestures only. So soon as there

is a vent for words, the first expressions are naturally broken and

interrupted. At last we ought to expect a tide of intermingled

sentiments, occasioned by the fluctuation of the mind betwixt the two

passions. Æmilia is made to behave in a very different manner. With

extreme coolness she describes her own situation, as if she were merely

a spectator; or rather the poet takes the task off her hands.

Et je me rens, Seigneur, à ces hautes bontés,

Je recouvre la vûe auprés de leurs clartés,

Je connois mon forfait qui me sembloit justice,

Et ce que n’avoit pû la terreur du supplice,

Je sens naitre en mon ame un repentir puissant;

Et mon cœur en secret me dit, qu’il y consent.

Le ciel a résolu votre grandeur suprême,

Et pour preuve, Seigneur, je n’en veux que moi-même;

J’ose avec vanité me donner cet éclat,

Puisqu’il change mon cœur, qu’il veut changer l’état.

Ma haine va mourir que j’ai crue immortelle,

Elle est morte, et ce cœur devient sujet fidéle,

Et prenant désormais cette haine en horreur,

L’ardeur de vous servir succede à sa fureur.

_Act 5. sc. 3._

In the tragedy of _Sertorius_, the Queen, surprised with the news that

her lover was assassinated, instead of venting any passion, degenerates

into a cool spectator, even so much as to instruct the by-standers how a

queen ought to behave on such an occasion.

_Viriate._ Il m’en fait voir ensemble, et l’auteur, et la cause.

Par cet assassinat c’est de moi qu’on dispose,

C’est mon trône, c’est moi qu’on pretend conquerir,

Et c’est mon juste choix qui seul l’a fait perir.

Madame, aprés sa perte, et parmi ces alarmes,

N’attendez point de moi de soupirs, ni de larmes;

Ce sont amusemens que dédaigne aisement

Le prompt et noble orgueil d’un vif ressentiment.

Qui pleure, l’affoiblit, qui soupire, l’exhale,

Il faut plus de fierté dans une ame royale;

Et ma douleur soumise aux soins de le venger, _&c._

_Act 5. sc. 3._

So much in general upon the genuine sentiments of passion. I proceed now

to particular observations. And, first, Passions are seldom uniform for

any considerable time: they generally fluctuate, swelling and subsiding

by turns, often in a quick succession[51]. This fluctuation, in the

case of a real passion, will be expressed externally by proper

sentiments; and ought to be imitated in writing and acting. Accordingly,

a climax shows never better than in expressing a swelling passion. The

following passages shall suffice for an illustration.

_Oroonoko._---- Can you raise the dead?

Pursue and overtake the wings of time?

And bring about again, the hours, the days,

The years, that made me happy?

_Oroonoko, act 2. sc. 2._

_Almeria_.---- How hast thou charm’d

The wildness of the waves and rocks to this?

That thus relenting they have giv’n thee back

To earth, to light and life, to love and me?

_Mourning Bride, act 1. sc. 7._

I would not be the villain that thou think’st

For the whole space that’s in the tyrant’s grasp,

And the rich earth to boot.

_Macbeth, act 4. sc. 4._

The following passage expresses finely the progress of conviction.

Let me not stir, nor breathe, lest I dissolve

That tender, lovely form, of painted air,

So like Almeria. Ha! it sinks, it falls;

I’ll catch it ere it goes, and grasp her shade.

’Tis life! ’tis warm! ’tis she! ’tis she herself!

It is Almeria! ’tis, it is my wife!

_Mourning Bride, act 2. sc. 6._

In the progress of thought, our resolutions become more vigorous as well

as our passions.

If ever I do yield or give consent,

By any action, word, or thought, to wed

Another Lord; may then just Heav’n show’r down, _&c._

_Mourning Bride, act 1. sc. 1._

And this leads to a second observation, That the different stages of a

passion, and its different directions, from its birth to its extinction,

ought to be carefully represented in the sentiments, which otherwise

will often be misplaced. Resentment, for example, when provoked by an

atrocious injury, discharges itself first upon the author. Sentiments

therefore of revenge take place of all others, and must in some measure

be exhausted before the person injured think of pitying himself, or of

grieving for his present distress. In the _Cid_ of Corneille, Don Diegue

having been affronted in a cruel manner, expresses scarce any sentiment

of revenge, but is totally occupied in contemplating the low situation

to which he was reduced by the affront.

O rage! ô desespoir! ô vieillesse ennemie!

N’ai je donc tant vecu que pour cette infamie?

Et ne suis-je blanchi dans les travaux guerriers,

Que pour voir en une jour fletrir tant de lauriers?

Mon bras, qu’avec respect toute l’Espagne admire,

Mon bras, qui tant de fois a sauvé cet empire,

Tant de fois affermi le trône de son roi,

Trahit donc ma querelle, et ne fait rien pour moi!

O cruel souvenir de ma gloire passée!

Oeuvre de tant de jours en un jour effacée!

Nouvelle dignité fatale à mon bonheur!

Precipice élevé d’ou tombe mon honneur!

Faut-il de votre éclat voir triompher le Comte,

Et mourir sans vengeance, ou vivre dans la honte?

Comte, fois de mon Prince à present gouverneur,

Ce haut rang n’admet point un homme sans honneur;

Et ton jaloux orgueil par cet affront insigne,

Malgré le choix du Roi, m’en a su rendre indigne.

Et toi, de mes exploits glorieux instrument,

Mais d’un corps tout de glace inutile ornement,

Fer jadis tant a craindre, et qui dans cette offense

M’as servi de parade, et non pas de defense,

Va quitte desormais le dernier des humains,

Passe pour me vanger en de meilleures mains.

_Le Cid, act 1. sc. 4._

These sentiments are certainly not what occur to the mind in the first

movements of the passion. In the same manner as in resentment, the first

movements of grief are always directed upon its object. Yet with

relation to the hidden and severe distemper that seized Alexander

bathing in the river Cydnus, Quintus Curtius describes the first

emotions of the army as directed upon themselves, lamenting that they

were left without a leader far from home, and had scarce any hopes of

returning in safety. Their King’s distress, which must naturally have

been their first concern, occupies them but in the second place

according to that author. In the _Aminta_ of Tasso, Sylvia, upon a

report of her lover’s death, which she believed certain, instead of

bemoaning the loss of a beloved object, turns her thoughts upon

herself, and wonders her heart does not break.

Ohime, ben son di sasso,

Poi che questa novella non m’uccide.

_Act 4. sc. 2._

In the tragedy of _Jane Shore_, Alicia, in the full purpose of

destroying her rival, has the following reflection:

Oh Jealousy! thou bane of pleasing friendship,

Thou worst invader of our tender bosoms;

How does thy rancour poison all our softness,

And turn our gentle natures into bitterness?

See where she comes! Once my heart’s dearest blessing,

Now my chang’d eyes are blasted with her beauty,

Loathe that known face, and sicken to behold her.

_Act 3. sc. 1._

These are the reflections of a cool spectator. A passion while it has

the ascendant, and is freely indulged, suggests not to the man who feels

it any sentiment to its own prejudice. Reflections like the foregoing,

occur not to him readily till the passion have spent its vigor.

A person sometimes is agitated at once by different passions. The mind

in this case vibrating like a pendulum, vents itself in sentiments which

partake of the same vibration. This I give as a third observation:

_Queen._ ‘Would I had never trod this English earth,

Or felt the flatteries that grow upon it!

Ye’ve angels faces, but Heav’n knows your hearts.

What shall become of me now! wretched lady!

I am the most unhappy woman living.

Alas! poor wenches, where are now your fortunes? [_To her women._

Shipwreck’d upon a kingdom, where no pity,

No friends, no hope! no kindred weep for me!

Almost, no grave allow’d me.

_Henry VIII. act 3. sc. 1._

_Othello._ Oh devil, devil! If that the earth could teem with

woman’s tears, Each drop she falls, would prove a crocodile. Out of

my sight.

_Desdemona._ I will not stay t’offend you. [_going._

_Lodovico._ Truly, an obedient lady: I do beseech your Lordship,

call her back.

_Oth._ Mistress----

_Des._ My Lord.

_Oth._ What would you with her, Sir?

_Lod._ Who, I, my Lord?

_Oth._ Ay; you did wish that I would make her turn: Sir, she can

turn and turn, and yet go on; And turn again. And she can weep,

Sir, weep; And she’s obedient: as you say, obedient; Very

obedient--proceed you in your tears--Concerning this, Sir,--oh

well-painted passion!--I am commanded home--get you away, I’ll send

for you anon--Sir, I obey the mandate, And will return to

Venice.---- Hence, avaunt! [_Exit Desdemona._

_Othello, act 4. sc. 6._

_Æmilia._ Oh! my good Lord, I would speak a word with you.

_Othello._ Yes, ’tis Æmilia--by and by--she’s dead. ’Tis like, she

comes to speak of Cassio’s death; The noise was high.--Ha, no more

moving? Still as the grave. Shall she come in? were’t good? I think

she stirs again--No--what’s the best? If she come in, she’ll, sure,

speak to my wife; My wife! my wife! What wife? I have no wife. Oh

insupportable! oh heavy hour!

_Othello, act 5. sc. 7._

A fourth observation is, that nature, which gave us passions, and made

them extremely beneficial when moderate, intended undoubtedly that they

should be subjected to the government of reason and conscience[52]. It

is therefore against the order of nature, that passion in any case

should take the lead in contradiction to reason and conscience. Such a

state of mind is a sort of anarchy, which every one is ashamed of, and

endeavours to hide or dissemble. Even love, however laudable, is

attended with a conscious shame when it becomes immoderate: it is

covered from the world, and disclosed only to the beloved object:

Et que l’amour souvent de remors combattu

Paroisse une foiblesse, et non une vertu.

_Boileau, L’art poet. chant. 3. l. 101._

O, they love least that let men know their love.

_Two Gentlemen of Verona, act 1. sc. 3._

Hence a capital rule in the representation of strong passions, that

their genuine sentiments ought to be hid or dissembled as much as

possible. And this holds in an especial manner with respect to criminal

passions. One never counsels the commission of a crime in plain terms.

Guilt must not appear in its native colours, even in thought: the

proposal must be made by hints, and by representing the action in some

favourable light. Of the propriety of sentiment upon such an occasion,

Shakespear, in the _Tempest_, has given us a beautiful example. The

subject is a proposal made by the usurping Duke of Milan to Sebastian,

to murder his brother the King of Naples.

_Antonio._---- What might

Worthy Sebastian--O, what might--no more.

And yet, methinks, I see it in thy face,

What thou should’st be: th’occasion speaks thee, and

My strong imagination sees a crown

Dropping upon thy head.

_Act 2. sc. 1._

There cannot be a finer picture of this sort, than that of King John

soliciting Hubert to murder the young Prince Arthur.

_K. John._ Come hither, Hubert. O my gentle Hubert,

We owe thee much; within this wall of flesh

There is a soul counts thee her creditor,

And with advantage means to pay thy love.

And, my good friend, thy voluntary oath

Lives in this bosom, dearly cherished.

Give me thy hand, I had a thing to say----

But I will fit it with some better time.

By Heaven, Hubert, I’m almost asham’d

To say what good respect I have of thee.

_Hubert._ I am much bounden to your Majesty.

_K. John._ Good friend, thou hast no cause to say so yet----

But thou shalt have--and creep time ne’er so slow,

Yet it shall come for me to do thee good.

I had a thing to say--but, let it go:

The sun is in the heav’n, and the proud day,

Attended with the pleasures of the world,

Is all too wanton, and too full of gawds,

To give me audience. If the midnight-bell

Did with his iron tongue and brazen mouth

Sound one into the drowsy race of night;

If this same were a church-yard where we stand,

And thou possessed with a thousand wrongs;

Or if that surly spirit Melancholy

Had bak’d thy blood and made it heavy-thick,

Which else runs tickling up and down the veins,

Making that idiot Laughter keep men’s eyes,

And strain their cheeks to idle merriment,

(A passion hateful to my purposes);

Or if that thou could’st see me without eyes,

Hear me without thine ears, and make reply

Without a tongue, using conceit alone,

Without eyes, ears, and harmful sounds of words;

Then, in despight of broad-ey’d watchful day,

I would into thy bosom pour my thoughts.

But ah, I will not--Yet I love thee well;

And, by my troth, I think thou lov’st me well.

_Hubert._ So well, that what you bid me undertake,

Though that my death were adjunct to my act,

By Heav’n, I’d do’t.

_K. John._ Do not I know, thou would’st?

Good Hubert, Hubert, Hubert, throw thine eye

On yon young boy. I’ll tell thee what, my friend;

He is a very serpent in my way.

And, wheresoe’er this foot of mine doth tread,

He lies before me. Dost thou understand me?

Thou art his keeper.

_King John, act 3. sc. 5._

As things are best illustrated by their contraries, I proceed to collect

from classical authors, sentiments that appear faulty. The first class

shall consist of sentiments that accord not with the passion; or, in

other words, sentiments that the passion represented does not naturally

suggest. In the second class, shall be ranged sentiments that may belong

to an ordinary passion, but unsuitable to it as tinctured by a singular

character. Thoughts that properly are not sentiments, but rather

descriptions, make a third. Sentiments that belong to the passion

represented, but are faulty as being introduced too early or too late,

make a fourth. Vicious sentiments exposed in their native dress, instead

of being concealed or disguised, make a fifth. And in the last class,

shall be collected sentiments suited to no character or passion, and

therefore unnatural.

* * * * *

The first class contains faulty sentiments of various kinds, which I

shall endeavour to distinguish from each other. And first sentiments

that are faulty by being above the tone of the passion.

_Othello._---- O my soul’s joy!

If after every tempest come such calms,

May the winds blow till they have waken’d death:

And let the labouring bark climb hills of seas

Olympus high, and duck again as low

As hell’s from heaven!

_Othello, act 2. sc. 6._

This sentiment is too strong to be suggested by so slight a joy as that

of meeting after a storm at sea.

_Philaster._ Place me, some god, upon a pyramid

Higher than hills of earth, and lend a voice

Loud as your thunder to me, that from thence

I may discourse to all the under-world

The worth that dwells in him.

_Philaster of Beaumont and Fletcher, act 4._

Secondly, Sentiments below the tone of the passion. Ptolemy, by putting

Pompey to death, having incurred the displeasure of Cæsar, was in the

utmost dread of being dethroned. In this agitating situation, Corneille

makes him utter a speech full of cool reflection, that is in no degree

expressive of the passion.

Ah! si je t’avois crû, je n’aurois pas de maître,

Je serois dans le trône où le Ciel m’a fait naître;

Mais c’est une imprudence assez commune aux rois,

D’ecouter trop d’avis, et se tromper au choix.

Le Destin les aveugle au bord du précipice,

Ou si quelque lumiere en leur ame se glisse,

Cette fausse clarté dont il les eblouit,

Le plonge dans une gouffre, et puis s’evanouit.

_La mort de Pompée, act 4. sc. 1._

Elements of Criticism, Volume II. · 第 6 / 19 段