Corcyra. Some of them are mere rocks, and cannot be distinguished by
their ancient names. The present names of four are Sametraki, Diaplo,
Boaia, and the Isle of Ulysses.
[2599] Now Capo Drasti.
[2600] Now Capo Levkimo. The islands are those of Santo Niccolo.
[2601] Or Islands of the Teleboans.
[2602] These three seem to be those now called Magnisi, Kalamota,
and Kastus. These lie facing the promontory of Leucadia, the others
opposite Ætolia.
[2603] Opposite Acarnania: by the Venetians they were called the
Islands of Kurtzolari. Some of them are cultivated, others again are
mere rocks.
[2604] Now called Cephallenia.
[2605] Now Zante.
[2606] Now Thiaki, or Cefalogna Piccola—Little Cephallenia.
[2607] The general opinion is, that Strabo is right in identifying this
island with one of the Echinades; but it seems impossible now to say
which of them was so called.
[2608] Sometimes confounded with Cephallenia; but, according to Virgil
and Mela, as well as Pliny, they were different islands.
[2609] Crocylæa was a town of Acarnania, referred to by Homer; and
there was a district of Ithaca called Crocylcium. Pliny is probably in
error in mentioning Crocyle as an island.
[2610] Or the “Black Island;” probably from its thick foliage.
[2611] Pale, Cranii, and Proni.
[2612] So called from its fir-trees. It now has the name of Scopo.
[2613] Now Monte Stefano.
[2614] See c. 6 of this Book.
[2615] Supposed by some writers to be the same with the rocky isle now
called Dyscallio. Though mentioned by Homer, its existence was disputed
by many of the ancient commentators.
[2616] The modern Strivali and Stamphane.
[2617] The present Guardiania, according to Lapie.
[2618] According to Ansart, these were Prote, now Prodano, and Sphagia,
formerly Sphacteria, before Pylos, now called Zonchio, or Old Navarino;
the third being perhaps the isle of Bechli, in the Bay of Navarino.
[2619] Now called Sapienza, Santa Maria, and Cabrera.
[2620] Venetico and Formignes are the names of two of them.
[2621] Now Servi.
[2622] The modern Cerigo.
[2623] It is much further from the Cape of Malea or Santo Angelo than
the distance here mentioned. It derived its name of Porphyris from the
purple fishery established here by the Phœnicians.
[2624] The modern Isle of Port Tolon. Irine is the present Hipsyli
according to Leake, who also identifies Ephyre with Spetzia.
[2625] At the south of Argolis.
[2626] The modern Dhoko, according to Leake. Some authorities think
that Tiparenus, and not Ephyre, is the modern Spetzia.
[2627] Leake thinks that Colonis and Hydreia, now called Hydra, were
the same island; but Kiepert thinks it the same as the small island to
the south of Spetzia.
[2628] Now Poros.
[2629] These are the islands now called Moni Jorench, Kophinidia, and
San Giorgio d’Arbora. It is perhaps impossible to identify them, except
that Belbina is generally supposed to be the island of San Giorgio.
[2630] Now Kyra.
[2631] The modern Angistri.
[2632] Which name, or Eghina, it still retains.
[2633] See c. 9 of this Book.
[2634] Probably the modern Laoussa, one of this group.
[2635] By Brotier said to be the modern Pentenesia. The other islands
here mentioned seem not to have been identified.
[2636] Now Cerigotto.
[2637] Dalechamps suggests Hesperus.
[2638] The island “of the Blessed.”
[2639] Now Capo Salomon.
[2640] From the Greek κριοῦ μέτωπον, “the ram’s forehead”; now called
Capo Crio.
[2641] Also called Elæa. Pococke speaks of it as a promontory called
Chaule-burnau.
[2642] Hardouin calls it Chisamo.
[2643] The modern Khania. The quince derived its Latin name, “Malum
Cydonium,” from this district, to which it was indigenous. From its
Latin name it was called _melicotone_ by the writers of the Elizabethan
period.
[2644] Now Minolo, according to Hardouin.
[2645] The port of Apteron, or Aptera, which Mr. Pashley supposes to be
denoted by the ruins of Palæokastro; he also thinks that its port was
at or near the modern Kalyres.
[2646] Now La Suda, according to Hardouin, who says that Rhithymna is
called Retimo; Panormus, Panormo; and Cytæum, Setia.
[2647] Supposed by Ansart to have stood in the vicinity of the modern
city of Candia.
[2648] Strabo says that it stood on the narrowest part of the island,
opposite Minoa. Vestiges of it have been found at the Kastéle of
Hierapetra. Its foundation was ascribed to the Corybantes.
[2649] Now Lionda.
[2650] Next to Cnossus in splendour and importance. Mr. Pashley places
its site near the modern Haghius Dheka, the place of the martyrdom of
the ten Saints, according to tradition, in the Decian persecution.
[2651] It has been remarked, that Pliny is mistaken here if he intends
to enumerate Cnossus among the towns of the interior of Crete. The only
remains of this capital of Crete, situate on the north of the island,
are those seen at Makro-Teikho, or the “Long Walls,” so called from the
masses of Roman brick-work there seen.
[2652] Though an inland town, it probably stood in the vicinity of
the headland or promontory of the same name, which is now called Kavo
Stavro. Many of these names are utterly unknown.
[2653] One of the most important towns of Crete, on the N.W. slope of
Mount Ida, about fifty stadia from the port of Astale. Mr. Pashley says
that some remains probably of this place are still to be seen on a hill
near a place called Eletherna, five miles south of the great convent of
Arkadhi.
[2654] The loftiest point of the mountain-range that traverses the
island of Crete from west to east. Its head is covered with snow. The
modern name is Psiloriti, looking down on the plain of Mesara. The word
_Ida_ is supposed to mean a mountain in which mines are worked, and the
Idæi Dactyli of Crete were probably among the first workers in iron and
bronze. The position of Mount Cadistus, belonging to the range of White
Mountains, has been fixed by Hoeck at Cape Spadha, the most northerly
point of the island. It is thought that Pliny and Solinus are in error
in speaking of Cadistus and Dictynnæus as separate peaks, these being,
both of them, names of the mountain of which the cape was formed; the
latter name having been given in later times, from the worship and
temple there of Dictynna.
[2655] Now Grabusa, the N.W. promontory of Crete.
[2656] Now Ras-al-Sem, or Cape Rasat, in Africa. The distance,
according to Brotier, is in reality about 225 miles.
[2657] Now Skarpanto.
[2658] According to Hardouin, all of these are mere rocks rather than
islands.
[2659] The modern Haghios Theodhoros.
[2660] According to Hoeck, they are now called Turlure.
[2661] Now called Standiu.
[2662] Now Capo Xacro, on the east, though Cape Salomon, further north,
has been suggested. In the latter case, the Grandes islands would
correspond with Onisia and Leuce, mentioned by Pliny.
[2663] Now Gaidurognissa. None of the other islands here mentioned seem
to have been identified.
[2664] Between Eubœa and Locris. They are now called Ponticonesi.
[2665] Now Koluri. It is memorable for the naval battle fought off its
coast, when Xerxes was defeated by the Greeks, B.C. 480.
[2666] Now called Lypsokutali.
[2667] Now Makronisi, or “the Long Island.” Its ancient name was also
Macris. Strabo identifies it with the Homeric Cranaë, to which Paris
fled with Helen.
[2668] Usually called Cea, one of the Cyclades, about thirteen miles
S.E. of Sunium. Its modern name is Zea. Iulis was the most important
town, and the birth-place of the poets Simonides and Bacchylides, of
the sophist Prodicus, the physician Erasistratus, and the Peripatetic
philosopher Ariston. Extensive remains of it still exist.
[2669] There are considerable remains of this town, called by the
inhabitants Stais Palais.
[2670] Or Coresia. It was the harbour of Iulis, to which place we learn
from Strabo that its inhabitants were transferred.
[2671] On the S.W. side of the island. Its ruins are inconsiderable,
but retain their ancient name.
[2672] Now called Eubœa, as also Egripo, or Negropont,—a corruption of
the former word and “pont,” “a bridge.”
[2673] Hardouin speaks of this as existing in his time, 1670, and being
250 feet in length. It is supposed to have been first constructed about
B.C. 411, for the purpose of uninterrupted communication with Bœotia.
[2674] Now Capo Mandili.
[2675] Now Kavo Doro, or Xylofago.
[2676] Now Lithadha, with a mountain 2837 feet above the sea.
[2677] These measurements are not exactly correct. The length from
north to south is about ninety miles; the extreme breadth across,
thirty, and in one part, not more than four miles.
[2678] Still extant in the time of Strabo, who speaks of it as an
inconsiderable place.
[2679] Its site is now called Lipso. It contained warm baths sacred to
Hercules, and used by the Dictator Sylla. They are still to be seen.
[2680] Now Egripo, or Negropont, having given name to the rest of the
island. The Euripus is here only forty yards across, being crossed by
a bridge, partly of stone, partly of wood. The poet Lycophron and the
orator Isæus were natives of this place, and Aristotle died here.
[2681] Near the promontory of that name, now Capo Mandili. In the
town there was a famous temple of Poseidon, or Neptune. According to
Hardouin, the modern name is Iastura.
[2682] One of the most powerful cities of Eubœa. It was destroyed by
the Persians under Darius, and a new town was built to the south of the
old one. New Eretria stood, according to Leake, at the modern Kastri,
and old Eretria in the neighbourhood of Vathy. The tragic poet Achæus,
a contemporary of Æschylus, was born here; and a school of philosophy
was founded at this place by Menedemus, a disciple of Plato.
[2683] Now Karysto, on the south of the island, at the foot of Mount
Ocha, upon which are supposed to have been its quarries of marble.
There are but few remains of the ancient city. The historian Antigonus,
the comic poet Apollodorus, and the physician Diocles, were natives of
this place.
[2684] Probably on the promontory of the same name. It was off this
coast that the Greek fleet engaged that of Xerxes, B.C. 480.
[2685] There were tame fish kept in this fountain; and its waters were
sometimes disturbed by volcanic agency. Leake says that it has now
totally disappeared.
[2686] From the fact of its producing copper, and of its being in shape
long and narrow.
[2687] Strabo remarks, that Homer calls its inhabitants Abantes, while
he gives to the island the name of Eubœa. The poets say that it took
its name from the cow (Βοῦς) Io, who gave birth to Epaphus on this
island.
[2688] Hardouin remarks here, that Pliny, Strabo, Mela, and Pausanias
use the term “Myrtoan Sea,” as meaning that portion of it which lies
between Crete and Attica, while Ptolemy so calls the sea which lies off
the coast of Caria.
[2689] Now called Spitilus, and the group of Micronisia, or “Little
Islands,” according to Hardouin.
[2690] From κύκλος, “a circle.”
[2691] Now Andro. It gives name to one of the comedies of Terence. The
ruins of the ancient city were found by the German traveller Ross, who
has published a hymn to Isis, in hexameter verse, which he discovered
here. It was famous for its wines.
[2692] Now Tino.
[2693] From its abounding in snakes (ὄφεις) and scorpions.
[2694] Now Mycono, south-east of Tenos and east of Delos. It was
famous in ancient mythology as one of the places where Hercules was
said to have defeated the Giants. It was also remarkable for the great
proportion of bald persons among its inhabitants.
[2695] So called from its resemblance to two breasts, μαζοι.
[2696] Wheeler says that the distance is but three miles; Tournefort,
six.
[2697] Once famous for its gold and silver mines, but equally notorious
for the bad character of its people. It is now called Siphno.
[2698] Now Serpho, lying between Cythnos and Siphnus.
[2699] Now Fermina, according to Hardouin.
[2700] Between Ceos and Seriphus. It is now called Thermia. Cydias the
painter was born here, and it was famous for its cheeses. Its modern
name is derived from its hot springs, which are much frequented.
[2701] Still called Delos; and, though so celebrated, nothing more than
a mere rock, five miles in circumference.
[2702] That is, according to Varro, whose statement is ridiculed
by Seneca. Some of the editors, however, punctuate this passage
differently, making it to mean, “the only island that has never
experienced an earthquake. Mucianus however has informed us, that down
to the time of M. Varro, it has been twice so visited.”
[2703] From its then becoming δῆλος, “plain,” or “manifest.” It was
after the fall of Corinth that Delos became so famous for its commerce.
Its bronze was in great request.
[2704] From ὄρτυξ, “a quail”; the legend being, that Latona was changed
into that bird by Jupiter, in order to effect her escape thither from
the anger of Juno. Its name of Asteria was derived from ἄστρον, “a
star,” either in consequence of its being devoted to the worship of
the great luminary Apollo, or of its being considered by the gods the
star of the earth. It was also called Lagia, from λαγὼς, “a hare,” that
animal abounding there; and Cynæthus, from κύων, “a dog,” it being
famous for its hounds.
[2705] A bare granite rock, not more than 500 feet in height. The
island is now a mass of ruins; a great part of its remains having been
carried away in the middle ages to Venice and Constantinople.
[2706] Divided by a strait of four stadia in width from Delos. Nicias
connected the two islands by a bridge. Its name of Celadussa was said
to be derived from the noise of the waves, κέλαδος, and of Artemite,
from Artemis, or Diana.
[2707] Now Syra; famous for its wine and corn.
[2708] Now Antiparos; famous for its stalactite grotto, which is not
mentioned by the ancient writers.
[2709] Now Paro; south of Delos and west of Naxos. The ruins of its
town are still to be seen at the modern Paroikia. The Parian Chronicle,
inscribed on marble, and containing a chronicle of Grecian history from
Cecrops, B.C. 1582, to B.C. 264, was found here. It is preserved at
Oxford.
[2710] Chiefly obtained from a mountain called Marpessa.
[2711] Now Naxia, famous both in ancient and modern times for its
remarkable fertility.
[2712] From στρογγύλος, “round,” its shape being somewhat inclined
to circular, though by Eustathius it is compared to the shape of a
vine-leaf. It is commonly called Dia by the poets. Tournefort says that
it is distant forty miles from Delos.
[2713] From Διόνυσος, or Bacchus, the god of wine.
[2714] Or “Fine City.” It took its other name from the fact of its
rivalling the fertility of Sicily.
[2715] According to Brotier, the Jesuit Babin, on visiting it, found
its circumference estimated at thirty-six miles only.
[2716] So called from lying scattered at random as it were, σπορὰς
“scattered.”
[2717] Helene is supposed to be the modern Pira; Phacussa, Fecussa;
Nicasia, Rachia; Schinussa, Schinusa; and Pholegandros, Policandro.
[2718] Now Nikaria, to the west of Samos. According to tradition, it
derived its name from Icarus, the son of Dædalus, who was believed to
have fallen into the sea in its vicinity.
[2719] Its length is not so great as is here mentioned by Pliny. Its
towns were Drepanum, or Dracanum, Œnoë, and Isti.
[2720] The first two names are from the Greek, in allusion to its long,
narrow shape, and the last bears reference to the fact of its shores
abounding in fish.
[2721] Now Scyro, east of Eubœa, and one of the Sporades. Here Achilles
was said to have been concealed by his mother Thetis, in woman’s attire.
[2722] Now Nio, one of the Sporades, inaccurately called by Stephanus
one of the Cyclades. The modern town is built on the site of the
ancient one, of which there are some remains. It was said that Homer
died here, on his voyage from Smyrna to Athens, and that his mother,
Clymene, was a native of this island. In 1773, Van Krienen, a Dutch
nobleman, asserted that he had discovered the tomb of Homer here, with
certain inscriptions relative to him; but they have been generally
regarded by the learned as forgeries. Odia and Oletandros seem not to
have been identified.
[2723] Now called Gioura, or Jura. It was little better than a barren
rock, though inhabited; but so notorious for its poverty, that its mice
were said to be able to gnaw through iron. It was used as a place of
banishment under the Roman emperors, whence the line of Juvenal, i. 73—
“Aude aliquid brevibus Gyaris et carcere dignum.”
“Dare some deed deserving of the little Gyara and the gaol.” It is now
uninhabited, except by a few shepherds in the summer.
[2724] Now Telos, or Piskopi, a small island in the Carpathian Sea, and
one of the Sporades. It lies off the coast of Caria. Syrnos appears not
to have been identified.
[2725] Near Naxos. Virgil calls it ‘viridis,’ or ‘green,’ which
Servius explains by the colour of its marble. Like Gyara, it was used
as a place of banishment under the Roman Empire. In C. 22, Pliny has
mentioned Cynæthus as one of the names of Delos.
[2726] Now Patmo, one of the Sporades, and west of the Promontory of
Posidium, in Caria. To this place St. John was banished, and here he
wrote the Apocalypse.
[2727] A group between Icaria and Samos. They are now called Phurni and
Krusi.
[2728] One of the Sporades, now Lebitha.
[2729] Now Lero. Its inhabitants were of Milesian origin, and of
indifferent character. In its temple of Artemis, the sisters of
Meleager were said to have been changed into guinea-fowls. It was
opposite the coast of Caria.
[2730] Now Zinari, N.E. of Amorgos. The artichoke (called κίναρα in
Greek) is said to have given name to it.
[2731] Now Sikino; between Pholegandros and Ios.
[2732] So called, according to Stephanus, from its cultivation of the
vine and produce of wine, οἶνος. It was situate between Pholegandros
and Ios. It was said to have had the name of Sicinus from a son of
Thoas and Œnoë. Hieracia seems to be unknown.
[2733] Still known by that name, and lying between Carpathus and Crete.
The ruins of the ancient town of Casos are still to be seen at the
village of Polin. It is mentioned by Homer.
[2734] Now Kimoli, one of the Cyclades, between Siphnos and Melos. It
took its name of Echinussa from the ‘Echinus,’ or Sea-urchin, of which
various fossil specimens are still found on the coast; but nowhere
else in these islands, except the opposite coast of Melos. There are
considerable ruins of its ancient town.
[2735] Now Milo, the most westerly of the Cyclades. It is remarkable
for its extreme fertility. Its town, which, according to most
authorities, was called Byblis, was situate on the north of the island.
[2736] Ansart remarks, that our author is mistaken in this assertion,
for not only are many others of these islands more circular in form,
but even that of Kimolo, which stands next to it.
[2737] Now Amorgo, S.E. of Naxos. It was the birth-place of the
Iambic poet Simonides. It is noted for its fertility. Under the Roman
emperors, it was used as a place of banishment.
[2738] Now Polybos, or Antimelos, an uninhabited island near Melos.
Phyle seems not to have been identified.
[2739] Now Santorin, south of the island of Ios. The tradition was,
that it was formed from a clod of earth, thrown from the ship Argo. It
is evidently of volcanic origin, and is covered with pumice-stone. It
was colonized by Lacedæmonians and Minyans of Lemnos, under the Spartan
Theras, who gave his name to the island.
[2740] A small island to the west of Thera, still known by the same
name.
[2741] In Lapie’s map, Ascania is set down as the present Christiana.
[2742] Now Anaphe, Namfi, or Namphio, one of the Sporades. It was
celebrated for the temple of Apollo Ægletes, the foundation of which
was ascribed to the Argonauts, and of which considerable remains still
exist. It abounds in partridges, as it did also in ancient times.
[2743] Now Astropalæa, or Stamphalia. By Strabo it is called one of the
Sporades, by Stephanus one of the Cyclades. It probably was favoured
by the Romans for the excellence and importance of its harbours. From
Hegesander we learn that it was famous for its hares, and Pliny tells
us, in B. viii. c. 59, that its mussels were (as they still are) very
celebrated.
[2744] None of these islands can be now identified, except perhaps
Chalcia, also mentioned by Strabo, and now known as Karki.
[2745] Now Kalymno, the principal island of the group, by Homer called
Calydne. According to most of the editions, Pliny mentions here
Calydna and Calymna, making this island, which had those two names,
into two islands. Although Pliny here mentions only the town of Coös,
still, in B. v. c. 36, he speaks of three others, Notium, Nisyrus, and
Mendeterus. There are still some remains of antiquity to be seen here.
[2746] Or Carpathus, now Skarpanto. It gave name to the sea between
Crete and Rhodes.
[2747] It still preserves its ancient name, and presents some
interesting remains of antiquity.
[2748] Brotier says that the distance is really fifty-two miles.
[2749] So called from the town of Petalia, on the mainland. Ansart says
that their present name is Spili.
[2750] Now Talanti, giving name to the Channel of Talanti.
[2751] The present Gulf of Volo, mentioned in C. 15 of the present Book.
[2752] Ansart suggests that this may possibly be the small island now
called Agios Nicolaos.
[2753] Now Trikeri.
[2754] In the present Chapter.
[2755] Now Scangero, or Skantzoura, according to Ansart.
[2756] Now the Gulf of Saloniki, mentioned in C. 17. The islands here
mentioned have apparently not been identified.
[2757] Off the coast of Thessaly, now Piperi.
[2758] Now Skiathos. It was famous for its wine.
[2759] Now called Embro, or Imru. Both the island and city of Imbros
are mentioned by Homer.
[2760] This is double the actual circumference of the island.
[2761] Now called Stalimene.
[2762] Its site is now called Palæo Kastro. Hephæstia, or Vulcan’s
Town, stood near the modern Rapanidi. That god was said to have fallen
into this island when thrown from heaven by Jupiter.
[2763] Now Thaso, or Tasso. Its gold mines were in early periods very
valuable.
[2764] Mentioned in C. 17 of this Book.
[2765] Ansart says that “forty-two” would be the correct reading here,
that being also the distance between Samothrace and Thasos.
[2766] Its modern name is Samothraki. It was the chief seat of the
mysterious worship of the Cabiri.
[2767] Only twelve, according to Ansart.
[2768] Barely eighteen, according to Brotier.
[2769] Now Monte Nettuno. Of course the height here mentioned by Pliny
is erroneous; but Homer says that from this mountain Troy could be seen.
[2770] Now called Skopelo, if it is the same island which is mentioned
by Ptolemy under the name of Scopelus. It exports wine in large
quantities.
[2771] Or the Fox Island, so called from its first settlers having
been directed by an oracle to establish a colony where they should
first meet a fox with its cub. Like many others of the islands here
mentioned, it appears not to have been identified.
[2772] See C. 18 of this Book.
[2773] None of these islands appear to have been identified by modern
geographers.
[2774] Now generally known as the Palus Mæotis or Sea of Azof.
[2775] The modern Caraboa, according to Brotier, stands on its site.
Priapus was the tutelary divinity of Lampsacus in this vicinity.
[2776] Or “entrance of Pontus”; now the Sea of Marmora.
[2777] “Ox Ford,” or “passage of the cow,” Io being said to have
crossed it in that form: now called the “Straits of Constantinople.”
[2778] Said to have been called ἄξενος or “inhospitable,” from its
frequent storms and the savage state of the people living on its
shores. In later times, on the principle of Euphemism, or abstaining
from words of ill omen, its name was changed to εὔξεινος, “hospitable.”
[2779] This was a favourite comparison of the ancients; the north
coast, between the Thracian Bosporus and the Phasis, formed the bow,
and the southern shores the string. The Scythian bow somewhat resembled
in form the figure Σ, the capital Sigma of the Greeks.
[2780] Now the Straits of Kaffa or Enikale.
[2781] This town lay about the middle of the Tauric Chersonesus or
Crimea, and was situate on a small peninsula, called the Smaller
Chersonesus, to distinguish it from the larger one, of which it formed
a part. It was founded by the inhabitants of the Pontic Heraclea, or
Heracleium, the site of which is unknown. See note [2844] to p. 333.
[2782] Now Kertsch, in the Crimea. It derived its name from the river
Panticapes; and was founded by the Milesians about B.C. 541. It was the
residence of the Greek kings of Bosporus, and hence it was sometimes so
called.
[2783] “Thirty-six” properly.
[2784] The Tanais or Don does not rise in the Riphæan Mountains, or
western branch of the Uralian chain, but on slightly elevated ground in
the centre of European Russia.
[2785] Chap. 18 of the present Book. Istropolis is supposed to be the
present Istere, though some would make it to have stood on the site of
the present Kostendsje, and Brotier identifies it with Kara-Kerman.
[2786] Now called the Schwarzwald or Black Forest. The Danube or Ister
rises on the eastern side at the spot called Donaueschingen.
[2787] So called from the Raurici, a powerful people of Gallia Belgica,
who possessed several towns, of which the most important were Augusta,
now Augst, and Basilia, now Bâle.
[2788] Only three of these are now considered of importance, as being
the main branches of the river. It is looked upon as impossible by
modern geographers to identify the accounts given by the ancients with
the present channels, by name, as the Danube has undergone in lapse of
time, very considerable changes at its mouth. Strabo mentions seven
mouths, three being lesser ones.
[2789] So called, as stated by Pliny, from the island of Peuce, now
Piczina. Peuce appears to have been the most southerly of the mouths.
[2790] Now called Kara-Sou, according to Brotier. Also called Rassefu
in the maps.
[2791] Now called Hazrali Bogasi, according to Brotier. It is called by
Ptolemy the Narakian Mouth.
[2792] Or the “Beautiful Mouth.” Now Susie Bogasi, according to Brotier.
[2793] Or the “False Mouth”: now the Sulina Bogasi, the principal mouth
of the Danube, so maltreated by its Russian guardians.
[2794] Or the “Passage of the Gnats,” so called from being the resort
of swarms of mosquitoes, which were said at a certain time of the year
to migrate to the Palus Mæotis. According to Brotier the present name
of this island is Ilan Adasi, or Serpent Island.
[2795] The “Northern Mouth”: near the town of Kilia.
[2796] Or the “Narrow Mouth.”
[2797] Though Strabo distinguishes the Getæ from the Daci, most of the
ancient writers, with Pliny, speak of them as identical. It is not
known, however, why the Getæ in later times assumed the name of Daci.
[2798] “Dwellers in waggons.” These were a Sarmatian tribe who wandered
with their waggons along the banks of the Volga. The chief seats of
the Aorsi, who seem in reality to have been a distinct people from
the Hamaxobii, was in the country between the Tanais, the Euxine, the
Caspian, and the Caucasus.
[2799] “Dwellers in Caves.” This name appears to have been given to
various savage races in different parts of the world.
[2800] There were races of the Alani in Asia on the Caucasus, and in
Europe on the Mæotis and the Euxine; but their precise geographical
position is not clearly ascertained.
[2801] The present Transylvania and Hungary.
[2802] The name given in the age of Pliny to the range of mountains
extending around Bohemia, and through Moravia into Hungary.
[2803] Its ruins are still to be seen on the south bank of the Danube
near Haimburg, between Deutsch-Altenburg and Petronell. The Roman fleet
of the Danube, with the 14th legion, was originally established there.
[2804] In Pliny’s time this migratory tribe seems to have removed to
the plains between the Lower Theiss and the mountains of Transylvania,
from which places they had expelled the Dacians.
[2805] The Lower Theiss.
[2806] Now the river Mark, Maros, or Morava.
[2807] The name of the two streams now known as the Dora Baltea and
Dora Riparia, both of which fall into the Po. This passage appears to
be in a mutilated state.
[2808] A chief of the Quadi; who, as we learn from Tacitus, was made
king of the Suevi by Germanicus, A.D. 19. Being afterwards expelled by
his nephews Vangio and Sido, he received from the emperor Claudius a
settlement in Pannonia. Tacitus gives the name of Suevia to the whole
of the east of Germany from the Danube to the Baltic.
[2809] According to Hardouin, Pliny here speaks of the other side of
the mountainous district called Higher Hungary, facing the Danube and
extending from the river Theiss to the Morava.
[2810] This, according to Sillig, is the real meaning of _a desertis_
here, the distance being measured from the Danube, and not between
the Vistula and the wilds of Sarmatia. The reading “four thousand” is
probably corrupt, but it seems more likely than that of 404 miles,
adopted by Littré, in his French translation.
[2811] Placed by Forbiger near Lake Burmasaka, or near Islama.
[2812] The Dniester. The mountains of Macrocremnus, or the “Great
Heights,” seem not to have been identified.
[2813] According to Hardouin, the modern name of this island is Tandra.
[2814] Now called the Teligul, east of the Tyra or Dniester.
[2815] Now called Sasik Beregen, according to Brotier.
[2816] The modern Gulf of Berezen, according to Brotier.
[2817] Probably the modern Okzakow.
[2818] The modern Dnieper. It also retains its ancient name of
Borysthenes.
[2819] We learn from Strabo that the name of this town was Olbia, and
that from being founded by the Milesians, it received the name of
Miletopolis. According to Brotier, the modern Zapurouski occupies its
site, between the mouths of the river Buzuluk.
[2820] This was adjacent to the strip of land called “Dromos
Achilleos,” or the ‘race-course of Achilles.’ It is identified by
geographers with the little island of Zmievoi or Oulan Adassi, the
‘Serpents Island.’ It was said that it was to this spot that Thetis
transported the body of Achilles. By some it was made the abode of the
shades of the blest, where Achilles and other heroes of fable were the
judges of the dead.
[2821] A narrow strip of land N.W. of the Crimea and south of the mouth
of the Dnieper, running nearly due west and east. It is now divided
into two parts called Kosa Tendra and Kosa Djarilgatch. Achilles was
said to have instituted games here.
[2822] According to Hardouin, the Siraci occupied a portion of the
present Podolia and Ukraine, and the Tauri the modern Bessarabia.
[2823] According to Herodotus, this region, called Hylæa, lay to the
east of the Borysthenes. It seems uncertain whether there are now any
traces of this ancient woodland; some of the old maps however give the
name of the “Black Forest” to this district. From the statements of
modern travellers, the woody country does not commence till the river
Don has been reached. The district of Hylæa has been identified by
geographers with the great plain of Janboylouk in the steppe of the
Nogai.
[2824] For Enœchadlæ, Hardouin suggests that we should read _Inde
Hylæi_, “hence the inhabitants are called by the name of Hylæi.”
[2825] The Panticapes is usually identified with the modern Somara, but
perhaps without sufficient grounds. It is more probably the Kouskawoda.
[2826] The Nomades or _wandering_, from the Georgi or _agricultural_
Scythians.
[2827] The Acesinus does not appear to have been identified by modern
geographers.
[2828] Above called Olbiopolis or Miletopolis.
[2829] The Bog or Boug. Flowing parallel with the Borysthenes or
Dnieper, it discharged itself into the Euxine at the town of Olbia, at
no great distance from the mouth of the Borysthenes.
[2830] Probably meaning the mouth or point at which the river
discharges itself into the sea.
[2831] The modern Gulf of Negropoli or Perekop, on the west side of the
Chersonesus Taurica or Crimea.
[2832] Forming the present isthmus of Perekop, which divides the Sea of
Perekop from the Sea of Azof.
[2833] Called by Herodotus Hypacyris, and by later writers Carcinites.
It is generally supposed to be the same as the small stream now known
as the Kalantchak.
[2834] Hardouin says that the city of Carcine has still retained its
name, but changed its site. More modern geographers however are of
opinion that nothing can be determined with certainty as to its site.
Of the site also of Navarum nothing seems to be known.
[2835] Or Buces or Byce. This is really a gulf, _almost_ enclosed, at
the end of the Sea of Azof. Strabo gives a more full description of it
under the name of the _Sapra Limnè_, “the Putrid Lake,” by which name
it is still called, in Russian, _Sibaché_ or Sivaché Moré. It is a vast
lagoon, covered with water when an east wind blows the water of the Sea
of Azof into it, but at other times a tract of slime and mud, sending
forth pestilential vapours.
[2836] It is rather a ridge of sand, that _almost_ separates it from
the waters of the gulf.
[2837] This river has not been identified by modern geographers.
[2838] According to Herodotus the Gerrhus or Gerrus fell into the
Hypacaris; which must be understood to be, not the Kalantchak, but the
Outlouk. It is probably now represented by the Moloschnijawoda, which
forms a shallow lake or marsh at its mouth.
[2839] It is most probable that the Pacyris, mentioned above, the
Hypacaris, and the Carcinites, were various names for the same river,
generally supposed, as stated above, to be the small stream of
Kalantchak.
[2840] Now the Crimea.
[2841] It does not appear that the site of any of these cities has been
identified. Charax was a general name for a fortified town.
[2842] Mentioned again by Pliny in B. vi. c. 7. Solinus says that in
order to repel avarice, the Satarchæ prohibited the use of gold and
silver.
[2843] On the site of the modern Perekop, more commonly called Orkapi.
[2844] Or Chersonesus of the Heracleans. The town of Kosleve or
Eupatoria is supposed to stand on its site.
[2845] After the conquest of Mithridates, when the whole of these
regions fell into the hands of the Romans.
[2846] The modern Felenk-burun. So called from the Parthenos or Virgin
Diana or Artemis, whose temple stood on its heights, in which human
sacrifices were offered to the goddess.
[2847] Supposed to be the same as the now-famed port of Balaklava.
[2848] The modern Aia-burun, the great southern headland of the Crimea.
According to Plutarch, it was called by the natives Brixaba, which,
like the name Criumetopon, meant the “Ram’s Head.”
[2849] Now Kerempi, a promontory of Paphlagonia in Asia Minor. Strabo
considers this promontory and that of Criumetopon as dividing the
Euxine into two seas.
[2850] According to Strabo, the sea-line of the Tauric Chersonesus,
after leaving the port of the Symboli, extended 125 miles, as far as
Theodosia. Pliny would here seem to make it rather greater.
[2851] The modern Kaffa occupies its site. The sites of many of the
places here mentioned appear not to be known at the present day.
[2852] The modern Kertsch, situate on a hill at the very mouth of the
Cimmerian Bosporus, or Straits of Enikale or Kaffa, opposite the town
of Phanagoria in Asia.
[2853] In C. 24 of the present Book. Clark identifies the town of
Cimmerium with the modern Temruk, Forbiger with Eskikrimm. It is again
mentioned in B. vi. c. 2.
[2854] He alludes here, not to the Strait so called, but to the
Peninsula bordering upon it, upon which the modern town of Kertsch is
situate, and which projects from the larger Peninsula of the Crimea, as
a sort of excrescence on its eastern side.
[2855] Probably Hermes or Mercury was its tutelar divinity: its site
appears to be unknown.
[2856] Probably meaning the Straits or passage connecting the Lake
Mæotis with the Euxine. The fertile district of the Cimmerian Bosporus
was at one time the granary of Greece, especially Athens, which
imported thence annually 400,000 medimni of corn.
[2857] A town so called on the Isthmus of Perekop, from a τάφρος or
trench, which was cut across the isthmus at this point.
[2858] Lomonossov, in his History of Russia, says that these people
were the same as the Sclavoni: but that one meaning of the name
‘Slavane’ being “a boaster,” the Greeks gave them the corresponding
appellation of Auchetæ, from the word αὐχὴ, which signifies “boasting.”
[2859] Of the Geloni, called by Virgil “picti,” or “painted,” nothing
certain seems to be known: they are associated by Herodotus with the
Budini, supposed to belong to the Slavic family by Schafarik. In B. iv.
c. 108, 109, of his History, Herodotus gives a very particular account
of the Budini, who had a city built entirely of wood, the name of which
was Gelonus. The same author also assigns to the Geloni a Greek origin.
[2860] The Agathyrsi are placed by Herodotus near the upper course of
the river Maris, in the S.E. of Dacia or the modern Transylvania. Pliny
however seems here to assign them a different locality.
[2861] Also called “Assedones” and “Issedones.” It has been suggested
by modern geographers that their locality must be assigned to the east
of Ichim, on the steppe of the central horde of the Kirghiz, and that
of the Arimaspi on the northern declivity of the chain of the Altaï.
[2862] Now the Don.
[2863] Most probably these mountains were a western branch of the
Uralian chain.
[2864] From the Greek πτεροφορὸς, “wing-bearing” or “feather-bearing.”
[2865] This legendary race was said to dwell in the regions beyond
Boreas, or the northern wind, which issued from the Riphæan mountains,
the name of which was derived from ῥιπαὶ or “hurricanes” issuing from
a cavern, and which these heights warded off from the Hyperboreans
and sent to more southern nations. Hence they never felt the northern
blasts, and enjoyed a life of supreme happiness and undisturbed repose.
“Here,” says Humboldt, “are the first views of a natural science which
explains the distribution of heat and the difference of climates by
local causes—by the direction of the winds—the proximity of the sun,
and the action of a moist or saline principle.”—_Asie Centrale_, vol. i.
[2866] Pindar says, in the “Pythia,” x. 56, “The Muse is no stranger
to their manners. The dances of girls and the sweet melody of the lyre
and pipe resound on every side, and wreathing their locks with the
glistening bay, they feast joyously. For this sacred race there is
no doom of sickness or of disease; but they live apart from toil and
battles, undisturbed by the exacting Nemesis.”
[2867] Hardouin remarks that Pomponius Mela, who asserts that the sun
rises here at the vernal and sets at the autumnal equinox, is right in
his position, and that Pliny is incorrect in his assertion. The same
commentator thinks that Pliny can have hardly intended to censure Mela,
to whose learning he had been so much indebted for his geographical
information, by applying to him the epithet “imperitus,” ‘ignorant’ or
‘unskilled’; he therefore suggests that the proper reading here is,
“ut non imperiti dixere,” “as some by no means ignorant persons have
asserted.”
[2868] The Attacori are also mentioned in B. vi. c. 20.
[2869] Sillig omits the word “non” here, in which case the reading
would be, “Those writers who place them anywhere but, &c.;” it is
difficult to see with what meaning.
[2870] Herodotus, B. iv., states to this effect, and after him,
Pomponius Mela, B. iii. c. 5.
[2871] These islands, or rather rocks, are now known as Fanari, and lie
at the entrance of the Straits of Constantinople.
[2872] From σὺν and πληγὴ, “a striking together.” Tournefort has
explained the ancient story of these islands running together, by
remarking that each of them consists of one craggy island, but that
when the sea is disturbed the water covers the lower parts, so as to
make the different points of each resemble isolated rocks. They are
united to the mainland by a kind of isthmus, and appear as islands only
when it is inundated in stormy weather.
[2873] Upon which the city of Apollonia (now Sizeboli), mentioned in C.
18 of the present Book, was situate.
[2874] So called because it was dedicated by Lucullus in the Capitol.
It was thirty cubits in height.
[2875] In C. 24 of the present Book.
[2876] Mentioned in the last Chapter as the “Island of Achilles.”
[2877] From the Greek μακαρῶν, “(The island) of the Blest.” It was also
called the “Island of the Heroes.”
[2878] Meaning all the inland or Mediterranean seas.
[2879] As the whole of Pliny’s description of the northern shores
of Europe is replete with difficulties and obscurities, we cannot
do better than transcribe the learned remarks of M. Parisot, the
Geographical Editor of Ajasson’s Edition, in reference to this subject.
He says, “Before entering on the discussion of this portion of Pliny’s
geography, let us here observe, once for all, that we shall not remark
as worthy of our notice all those ridiculous hypotheses which could
only take their rise in ignorance, precipitation, or a love of the
marvellous. We shall decline then to recognize the Doffrefelds in
the mountains of Sevo, the North Cape in the Promontory of Rubeas,
and the Sea of Greenland in the Cronian Sea. The absurdity of these
suppositions is proved by—I. The impossibility of the ancients ever
making their way to these distant coasts without the aid of large
vessels, the compass, and others of those appliances, aided by which
European skill finds the greatest difficulty in navigating those
distant seas. II. The immense lacunæ which would be found to exist in
the descriptions of these distant seas and shores: for not a word do
we find about those numerous archipelagos which are found scattered
throughout the North Sea, not a word about Iceland, nor about the
numberless seas and fiords on the coast of Norway. III. The absence of
all remarks upon the local phænomena of these spots. The North Cape
belongs to the second polar climate, the longest day there being two
months and a half. Is it likely that navigators would have omitted to
mention this remarkable phænomenon, well known to the Romans by virtue
of their astronomical theories, but one with which practically they had
never made themselves acquainted?—The only geographers who here merit
our notice are those who are of opinion that in some of the coasts or
islands here mentioned Pliny describes the Scandinavian Peninsula,
and in others the Coast of Finland. The first question then is, to
what point Pliny first carries us? It is evident that from the Black
Sea he transports himself on a sudden to the shores of the Baltic,
thus passing over at a single leap a considerable space filled with
nations and unknown deserts. The question then is, what line has he
followed? Supposing our author had had before his eyes a modern map,
the imaginary line which he would have drawn in making this transition
would have been from Odessa to the Kurisch-Haff. In this direction the
breadth across Europe is contracted to a space, between the two seas,
not more than 268 leagues in length. A very simple mode of reasoning
will conclusively prove that Pliny has deviated little if anything
from this route. If he fails to state in precise terms upon what point
of the shores of the Baltic he alights after leaving the Riphæan
mountains, his enumeration of the rivers which discharge themselves
into that sea, and with which he concludes his account of Germany, will
supply us with the requisite information, at all events in great part.
In following his description of the coast, we find mention made of
the following rivers, the Guttalus, the Vistula, the Elbe, the Weser,
the Ems, the Rhine, and the Meuse. The five last mentioned follow in
their natural order, from east to west, as was to be expected in a
description starting from the east of Europe for its western extremity
and the shores of Cadiz. We have a right to conclude then that the
Guttalus was to the east of the Vistula. As we shall now endeavour to
show, this river was no other than the Alle, a tributary of the Pregel,
which the Romans probably, in advancing from west to east, considered
as the principal stream, from the circumstance that they met with it,
before coming to the larger river. The Pregel after being increased
by the waters of the Alle or Guttalus falls into the Frisch-Haff,
about one degree further west than the Kurisch-Haff. It may however
be here remarked, Why not find a river more to the east, the Niemen,
for instance, or the Duna, to be represented by the Guttalus? The
Niemen in especial would suit in every respect equally well, because
it discharges itself into the Kurisch-Haff. This conjecture however
is incapable of support, when we reflect that the ancients were
undoubtedly acquainted with some points of the coast to the east of
the mouth of the Guttalus, but which, according to the system followed
by our author, would form part of the Continent of Asia. These points
are, 1st. The Cape Lytarmis (mentioned by Pliny, B. vi. c. 4). 2ndly.
The mouth of the river Carambucis (similarly mentioned by him), and
3rdly, a little to the east of Cape Lytarmis, the mouth of the Tanais.
The name of Cape Lytarmis suggests to us Lithuania, and probably
represents Domess-Ness in Courland; the Carambucis can be no other
than the Niemen; while the Tanais, upon which so many authors, ancient
and modern, have exhausted their conjectures, from confounding it with
the Southern Tanais which falls into the Sea of Azof, is evidently the
same as the Dwina or Western Duna. This is established incontrovertibly
both by its geographical position (the mouth of the Dwina being only
fifty leagues to the east of Domess-Ness) and the identity evidently
of the names Dwina and Tanais. Long since, Leibnitz was the first to
remark the presence of the radical _T. n_, or _D. n_, either with or
without a vowel, in the names of the great rivers of Eastern Europe;
Danapris or Dnieper, Danaster or Dniester, Danube (in German Donau, in
Hungarian Duna), Tanais or Don, for example; all which rivers however
discharge themselves into the Black Sea. There can be little doubt then
of the identity of the Duna with the Tanais, it being the only body of
water in these vast countries which bears a name resembling the initial
_Tan_, or _Tn_, and at the same time belongs to the basin of the
Baltic. We are aware, it is true, that the White Sea receives a river
Dwina, which is commonly called the Northern Dwina, but there can be no
real necessity to be at the trouble of combating the opinion that this
river is identical with the Northern Tanais. As the result then of our
investigations, it is at the eastern extremity of the Frisch-Haff and
near the mouth of the Pregel, that we would place the point at which
Pliny sets out. As for the Riphæan mountains, they have never existed
anywhere but in the head of the geographers from whom our author drew
his materials. From the mountains of Ural and Poias, which Pliny could
not possibly have in view, seeing that they lie in a meridian as
eastern as the Caspian Sea, the traveller has to proceed 600 leagues to
the south-west without meeting with any chains of mountains or indeed
considerable elevations.”
[2880] It is pretty clear that he refers to the numerous islands
scattered over the face of the Baltic Sea, such as Dago, Oesel,
Gothland, and Aland.
[2881] The old reading here was Bannomanna, which Dupinet would
translate by the modern Bornholm. Parisot considers that the modern
Runa, a calcareous rock covered with vegetable earth, in the vicinity
of Domess-Ness, is the place indicated.
[2882] It has been suggested by Brotier that Pliny here refers to the
Icy Sea, but it is more probable that he refers to the north-eastern
part of the Baltic, which was looked upon by the ancients us forming
part of the open sea.
[2883] With reference to these divisions of land and sea, a subject
which is involved in the greatest obscurity, Parisot states it as his
opinion that the Amalchian or Icy Sea is that portion of the Baltic
which extends from Cape Rutt to Cape Grinea, while on the other hand
the Cronian Sea comprehends all the gulfs which lie to the east of
Cape Rutt, such as the Haff, the gulfs of Stettin and Danzic, the
Frisch-Haff, and the Kurisch-Haff. He also thinks that the name of
‘Cronian’ originally belonged only to that portion of the Baltic which
washes the coast of Courland, but that travellers gradually applied
the term to the whole of the sea. He is also of opinion that the word
“Cronium” owes its origin to the Teutonic and Danish adjective _groen_
or “green.” The extreme verdure which characterizes the islands of the
Danish archipelago has given to the piece of water which separates
the islands of Falster and Moen the name of Groensund, and it is far
from improbable that the same epithet was given to the Pomeranian and
Prussian Seas, which the Romans would be not unlikely to call ‘Gronium’
or ‘Cronium fretum,’ or ‘Cronium mare.’ In the name ‘Parapanisus’ he
also discovers a resemblance to that of modern Pomerania.
[2884] Upon this Parisot remarks that on leaving Cape Rutt, at a
distance of about twenty-five leagues in a straight line, we come
to the island of Funen or Fyen, commonly called Fionia, the most
considerable of the Danish archipelago next to Zealand, and which lying
between the two Belts, the Greater and the Smaller, may very probably
from that circumstance have obtained the name of Baltia. Brotier takes
Baltia to be no other than Nova Zembla—so conflicting are the opinions
of commentators!
[2885] Parisot suggests that under this name may possibly lie concealed
that of the modern island of Zealand or Seeland, and that it may have
borne on the side of it next to the Belt the name of Baltseeland,
easily corrupted by the Greeks into Basilia.
[2886] Brotier takes these to be the islands of Aloo, and Bieloi or
Ostrow, at the mouth of the river Paropanisus, which he considers to
be the same as the Obi. Parisot on the other hand is of opinion that
islands of the Baltic are here referred to; that from the resemblance
of the name Oönæ to the Greek ὠὸν, “an egg,” the story that the natives
subsisted on the eggs of birds was formed; that not improbably the
group of the Hippopodes resembled the shape of a horse-shoe, from which
the story mentioned by Pliny took its rise; and that the Fanesii (or,
as the reading here has it, the Panotii, “all-ears”) wore their hair
very short, from which circumstance their ears appeared to be of a
larger size than usual.
[2887] Tacitus speaks of three great groups of the German tribes, the
Ingævones forming the first thereof, and consisting of those which
dwelt on the margin of the ocean, the Hermiones in the interior, and
the Istævones in the east and south of Germany. We shall presently find
that Pliny adds two groups, the Vandili as the fourth, and the Peucini
and Basternæ as the fifth. This classification however is thought to
originate in a mistake, for Zeuss has satisfactorily shown that the
Vandili belonged to the Hermiones, and that Peucini and Basternæ are
only names of individual tribes and not of groups of tribes.
[2888] Brotier and other geographers are of opinion that by this name
the chain of the Doffrefeld mountains is meant; but this cannot be the
case if we suppose with Parisot that Pliny here returns south from the
Scandinavian islands and takes his departure from Cape Rutt in the
territory of the Ingævones. Still, it is quite impossible to say what
mountains he would designate under the name of Sevo. Parisot suggests
that it is a form of the compound word “seevohner,” “inhabitants of the
sea,” and that it is a general name for the elevated lands along the
margin of the sea-shore.
[2889] Parisot supposes that under this name the isle of Funen is
meant, but it is more generally thought that Norway and Sweden are thus
designated, as that peninsula was generally looked upon as an island by
the ancients. The Codanian Gulf was the sea to the east of the Cimbrian
Chersonesus or Jutland, filled with the islands which belong to the
modern kingdom of Denmark. It was therefore the southern part of the
Baltic.
[2890] By Eningia Hardouin thinks that the country of modern Finland
is meant. Poinsinet thinks that under the name are included Ingria,
Livonia, and Courland; while Parisot seems inclined to be of opinion
that under this name the island of Zealand is meant, a village of
which, about three-fourths of a league from the western coast,
according to him, still bears the name of Heinïnge.
[2891] Parisot is of opinion that the Venedi, also called Vinidæ and
Vindili, were of Sclavish origin, and situate on the shores of the
Baltic. He remarks that this people, in the fifth century, founded
in Pomerania, when quitted by the Goths, a kingdom, the chiefs of
which styled themselves the Konjucs of Vinland. Their name is also
to be found in Venden, a Russian town in the government of Riga, in
Windenburg in Courland, and in Wenden in the circle of the Grand Duchy
of Mecklenburg Schwerin.
[2892] Parisot remarks that these two peoples were probably only tribes
of the Venedi.
[2893] Parisot feels convinced that Pliny is speaking here of the
Gulf of Travemunde, the island of Femeren, and then of the gulf
which extends from that island to Kiel, where the Eider separates
Holstein from Jutland. On the other hand, Hardouin thinks that by the
Gulf of Cylipenus the Gulf of Riga is meant, and that Latris is the
modern island of Oësel. But, as Parisot justly remarks, to put this
construction on Pliny’s language is to invert the order in which he has
hitherto proceeded, evidently from east to west.
[2894] The modern Cape of Skagen on the north of Jutland.
[2895] When Drusus held the command in Germany, as we learn from
Strabo, B. vii.
[2896] It is generally agreed that this is the modern island of
Borkhum, at the mouth of the river Amaiius or Ems.
[2897] To a bean, from which (_faba_) the island had its name of
Fabaria. In confirmation of this Hardouin states, that in his time
there was a tower still standing there which was called by the natives
_Het boon huys_, “the bean house.”
[2898] From the word _gles_ or _glas_, which primarily means ‘glass,’
and then figuratively “amber.” Probably Œland and Gothland. They will
be found again mentioned in the Thirtieth Chapter of the present Book.
See p. 351.
[2899] Now the Scheldt.
[2900] In a straight line, of course. Parisot is of opinion that in
forming this estimate Agrippa began at the angle formed by the river
Piave in lat. 46° 4′, measuring thence to Cape Rubeas (now Rutt) in
lat. 54° 25′. This would give 8° 21′, to which, if we add some twenty
leagues for obliquity or difference of longitude, the total would make
exactly the distance here mentioned.
[2901] As Parisot remarks, it is totally impossible to conceive the
source of such an erroneous conclusion as this. Some readings make the
amount 248, others 268.
[2902] As already mentioned, Zeuss has satisfactorily shown that the
Vandili or Vindili properly belonged to the Hermiones. Tacitus mentions
but three groups of the German nations; the Ingævones on the ocean, the
Hermiones in the interior, and the Istævones in the east and south of
Germany. The Vandili, a Gothic race, dwelt originally on the northern
coast of Germany, but afterwards settled north of the Marcomanni on the
Riesengebirge. They subsequently appeared in Dacia and Pannonia, and in
the beginning of the fifth century invaded Spain. Under Genseric they
passed over into Africa, and finally took and plundered Rome in A.D.
455. Their kingdom was finally destroyed by Belisarius.
[2903] It is supposed that the Burgundiones were a Gothic people
dwelling in the country between the rivers Viadus and Vistula, though
Ammianus Marcellinus declares them to have been of pure Roman origin.
How they came into the country of the Upper Maine in the south-west
of Germany in A.D. 289, historians have found themselves at a loss
to inform us. It is not improbable that the two peoples were not
identical, and that the similarity of their name arose only from the
circumstance that they both resided in “burgi” or burghs. See Gibbon,
iii. 99. _Bohn’s Ed._
[2904] The Varini dwelt on the right bank of the Albis or Elbe, north
of the Langobardi. Ptolemy however, who seems to mention them as the
Avarini, speaks of them as dwelling near the sources of the Vistula, on
the site of the present Cracow. See Gibbon, iv. 225. _Bohn’s Ed._
[2905] Nothing whatever is known of the locality of this people.
[2906] They are also called in history Gothi, Gothones, Gotones and
Gutæ. According to Pytheas of Marseilles (as mentioned by Pliny, B.
xxxvii. c. 2), they dwelt on the coasts of the Baltic, in the vicinity
of what is now called the Fritsch-Haff. Tacitus also refers to the
same district, though he does not speak of them as inhabiting the
coast. Ptolemy again speaks of them as dwelling on the east of the
Vistula, and to the south of the Venedi. The later form of their name,
_Gothi_, does not occur till the time of Caracalla. Their native name
was Gutthinda. They are first spoken of as a powerful nation at the
beginning of the third century, when we find them mentioned as ‘Getæ,’
from the circumstance of their having occupied the countries formerly
inhabited by the Sarmatian Getæ. The formidable attacks made by this
people, divided into the nations of the Ostrogoths and Visigoths, upon
the Roman power during its decline, are too well known to every reader
of Gibbon to require further notice.
[2907] The inhabitants of Chersonesus Cimbrica, the modern peninsula
of Jutland. It seems doubtful whether these Cimbri were a Germanic
nation or a Celtic tribe, as also whether they were the same race
whose numerous hordes successively defeated six Roman armies, and were
finally conquered by C. Marius, B.C. 101, in the Campi Raudii. The more
general impression, however, entertained by historians, is that they
were a Celtic or Gallic and not a Germanic nation. The name is said to
have signified “robbers.” See Gibbon, i. 273, iii. 365. _Bohn’s Ed._
[2908] The Teutoni or Teutones dwelt on the coasts of the Baltic,
adjacent to the territory of the Cimbri. Their name, though belonging
originally to a single nation or tribe, came to be afterwards applied
collectively to the whole people of Germany. See Gibbon, iii. 139.
_Bohn’s Ed._
[2909] Also called Cauchi, Cauci, and Cayci, a German tribe to the east
of the Frisians, between the rivers Ems and Elbe. The modern Oldenburg
and Hanover are supposed to pretty nearly represent the country of the
Chauci. In B. xvi. c. 1. 2, will be found a further account of them by
Pliny, who had visited their country, at least that part of it which
lay on the sea-coast. They are mentioned for the last time in the third
century, when they had extended so far south and west that they are
spoken of as living on the banks of the Rhine.
[2910] Mentioned by Tacitus as dwelling in the east and south of
Germany.
[2911] It has been suggested by Titzius that the words “quorum Cimbri,”
“to whom the Cimbri belong,” are an interpolation; which is not
improbable, or at least that the word “Cimbri” has been substituted for
some other name.
[2912] This appears to be properly the collective name of a great
number of the German tribes, who were of a migratory mode of life, and
spoken of in opposition to the more settled tribes, who went under the
general name of Ingævones. Cæsar speaks of them as dwelling east of the
Ubii and Sygambri, and west of the Cherusci. Strabo makes them extend
in an easterly direction beyond the Albis or Elbe, and southerly as far
as the sources of the Danube. Tacitus gives the name of Suevia to the
whole of the east of Germany, from the Danube to the Baltic. The name
of the modern Suabia is derived from a body of adventurers from various
German tribes, who assumed the name of Suevi in consequence of their
not possessing any other appellation.
[2913] A large and powerful tribe of Germany, which occupied the
extensive tract of country between the mountains in the north-west of
Bohemia and the Roman Wall in the south-west, which formed the boundary
of the Agri Decumates. On the east they bordered on the Narisci, on
the north-east on the Cherusci, and on the north-west on the Chatti.
There is little doubt that they originally formed part of the Suevi.
At a later period they spread in a north-easterly direction, taking
possession of the north-western part of Bohemia and the country about
the sources of the Maine and Saale, that is, the part of Franconia as
far as Kissingen and the south-western part of the kingdom of Saxony.
The name Hermunduri is thought by some to signify highlanders, and to
be a compound of _Her_ or _Ar_, “high,” and _Mund_, “man.”
[2914] One of the great tribes of Germany, which rose to importance
after the decay of the power of the Cherusci. It is thought by
ethnographers that their name is still preserved in the word “Hessen.”
They formed the chief tribe of the Hermiones here mentioned, and
are described by Cæsar as belonging to the Suevi, though Tacitus
distinguishes them, and no German tribe in fact occupied more
permanently its original locality than the Chatti. Their original abode
seems to have extended from the Westerwald in the west to the Saale in
Franconia, and from the river Maine in the south as far as the sources
of the Elison and the Weser, so that they occupied exactly the modern
country of Hessen, including perhaps a portion of the north-west of
Bavaria. See Gibbon, vol. iii. 99. _Bohn’s Ed._
[2915] The Cherusci were the most celebrated of all the German tribes,
and are mentioned by Cæsar as of the same importance as the Suevi,
from whom they were separated by the Silva Bacensis. There is some
difficulty in stating their exact locality, but it is generally
supposed that their country extended from the Visurgis or Weser in the
west to the Albis or Elbe in the east, and from Melibocus in the north
to the neighbourhood of the Sudeti in the south, so that the Chamavi
and Langobardi were their northern neighbours, the Chatti the western,
the Hermunduri the southern, and the Silingi and Semnones their eastern
neighbours. This tribe, under their chief Arminius or Hermann, forming
a confederation with many smaller tribes in A.D. 9, completely defeated
the Romans in the famous battle of the Teutoburg Forest. In later times
they were conquered by the Chatti, so that Ptolemy speaks of them
only as a small tribe on the south of the Hartz mountain. Their name
afterwards appears, in the beginning of the fourth century, in the
confederation of the Franks.
[2916] The Peucini are mentioned here, as also by Tacitus, as identical
with the Basternæ. As already mentioned, supposing them to be names
for distinct nations, they must be taken as only names of individual
tribes, and not of groups of tribes. It is generally supposed that
their first settlements in Sarmatia were in the highlands between the
Theiss and the March, whence they passed onward to the lower Danube,
as far as its mouth, where a portion of them, settling in the island
of Peuce, obtained the name of Peucini. In the later geographers we
find them settled between the Tyrus or Dniester, and the Borysthenes or
Dnieper, the Peucini remaining at the mouth of the Danube.
[2917] According to Parisot, the Guttalus is the same as the Alle, a
tributary of the Pregel. Cluver thinks that it is the same as the Oder.
Other writers again consider it the same as the Pregel.
[2918] Or Elbe.
[2919] Now the Weser.
[2920] The modern Ems.
[2921] The Meuse.
[2922] The ‘Hercynia Silva,’ Hercynian Forest or Range, is very
differently described by the writers of various ages. The earliest
mention of it is by Aristotle. Judging from the accounts given by
Cæsar, Pomponius Mela, and Strabo, the ‘Hercynia Silva’ appears to
have been a general name for almost all the mountains of Southern
and Central Germany, that is, from the sources of the Danube to
Transylvania, comprising the Schwarzwald, Odenwald, Spessart,
Rhön, Thuringer Wald, the Hartz mountain (which seems in a great
measure to have retained the ancient name), Raube Alp, Steigerwald,
Fichtelgebirge, Erzgebirge, and Riesengebirge. At a later period when
the mountains of Germany had become better known, the name was applied
to the more limited range extending around Bohemia, and through Moravia
into Hungary.
[2923] This island appears to have been formed by the bifurcation of
the Rhine, the northern branch of which enters the sea at Katwyck, a
few miles north of Leyden, by the Waal and the course of the Maas,
after it has received the Waal, and by the sea. The Waal or Vahalis
seems to have undergone considerable changes, and the place of its
junction with the Maas may have varied. Pliny makes the island nearly
100 miles in length, which is about the distance from the fort of
Schenkenschanz, where the first separation of the Rhine takes place,
to the mouth of the Maas. The name of Batavia was no doubt the genuine
name, which is still preserved in Betuwe, the name of a district at
the bifurcation of the Rhine and the Waal. The Canninefates, a people
of the same race as the Batavi, also occupied the island, and as the
Batavi seem to have been in the eastern part, it is supposed that the
Canninefates occupied the western. They were subdued by Tiberius in the
reign of Augustus.
[2924] The Frisii or Frisones were one of the great tribes of
north-western Germany, properly belonging to the group of the
Ingævones. They inhabited the country about Lake Flevo and other lakes,
between the Rhine and the Ems, so as to be bounded on the south by the
Bructeri, and on the east by the Chauci. Tacitus distinguishes between
the Frisii Majores and Minores, and it is supposed that the latter
dwelt on the east of the canal of Drusus in the north of Holland,
and the former between the rivers Flevus and Amisia, that is, in the
country which still bears the name of Friesland. The Chauci have been
previously mentioned.
[2925] The Frisiabones or Frisævones are again mentioned in C. 31 of
the present Book as a people of Gaul. In what locality they dwelt has
not been ascertained by historians.
[2926] The Sturii are supposed to have inhabited the modern South
Holland, while the Marsacii probably inhabited the island which the
Meuse forms at its junction with the Rhine, at the modern Dortrecht in
Zealand.
[2927] Supposed to be the site of the modern fortress of Briel, situate
at the mouth of the Meuse.
[2928] Probably the same as the modern Vlieland (thus partly retaining
its ancient name), an island north of the Texel. The more ancient
writers speak of two main arms, into which the Rhine was divided on
entering the territory of the Batavi, of which the one on the east
continued to bear the name of Rhenus, while that on the west into which
the Masa, Maas or Meuse, flowed, was called Vahalis or Waal. After
Drusus, B.C. 12, had connected the Flevo Lacus or Zuyder-Zee with
the Rhine by means of a canal, in forming which he probably made use
of the bed of the Yssel, we find mention made of three mouths of the
Rhine. Of these the names, as given by Pliny, are, on the west, Helium
(the Vahalis of other writers), in the centre Rhenus, and at the north
Flevum; but at a later period we again find mention made of only two
mouths.
[2929] Britain was spoken of by some of the Greek writers as superior
to all other islands in the world. Dionysius, in his Periegesis, says,
“that no other islands whatsoever can claim equality with those of
Britain.”
[2930] Said to have been so called from the whiteness of its cliffs
opposite the coast of Gaul.
[2931] Afterwards called Bononia, the modern Boulogne. As D’Anville
remarks, the distance here given by Pliny is far too great, whether
we measure to Dover or to Hythe; our author’s measurement however is
probably made to Rutupiæ (the modern Richborough), near Sandwich, where
the Romans had a fortified post, which was their landing-place when
crossing over from Gaul. This would make the distance given by Pliny
nearer the truth, though still too much.
[2932] Probably the Grampian range is here referred to.
[2933] The people of South Wales.
[2934] The Orkney islands were included under this name. Pomponius Mela
and Ptolemy make them but thirty in number, while Solinus fixes their
number at three only.
[2935] Also called Æmodæ or Hæmodæ, most probably the islands now known
as the Shetlands. Camden however and the older antiquarians refer the
Hæmodæ to the Baltic sea, considering them different from the Acmodæ
here mentioned, while Salmasius on the other hand considers the Acmodæ
or Hæmodæ and the Hebrides as identical. Parisot remarks that off the
West Cape of the Isle of Skye and the Isle of North Uist, the nearest
of the Hebrides to the Shetland islands, there is a vast gulf filled
with islands, which still bears the name of Mamaddy or Maddy, from
which the Greeks may have easily derived the words Αἱ Μαδδαὶ, whence
the Latin Hæmodæ.
[2936] The Isle of Anglesea.
[2937] Most probably the Isle of Man.
[2938] Camden and Gosselin (_Rech. sur la Géogr. des Anciens_) consider
that under this name is meant the island of Racklin, situate near the
north-eastern extremity of Ireland. A Ricina is spoken of by Ptolemy,
but that island is one of the Hebrides.
[2939] This Vectis is considered by Gosselin to be the same as the
small island of White-Horn, situate at the entrance of the Bay of
Wigtown in Scotland. It must not be confounded with the more southern
Vectis, or Isle of Wight.
[2940] According to Gosselin this is the island of Dalkey, at the
entrance of Dublin Bay.
[2941] Camden thinks that this is the same as Bardsey Island, at the
south of the island of Anglesea, while Mannert and Gosselin think that
it is the island of Lambay.
[2942] According to Brotier these islands belong to the coast of
Britanny, being the modern isles of Sian and Ushant.
[2943] As already mentioned, he probably speaks of the islands of Œland
and Gothland, and Ameland, called Austeravia or Actania, in which
_glæsum_ or amber was found by the Roman soldiers. See p. 344.
[2944] The opinions as to the identity of ancient Thule have been
numerous in the extreme. We may here mention six:—1. The common,
and apparently the best founded opinion, that Thule is the island
of Iceland. 2. That it is either the Ferroe group, or one of those
islands. 3. The notion of Ortelius, Farnaby, and Schœnning, that it is
identical with Thylemark in Norway. 4. The opinion of Malte Brun, that
the continental portion of Denmark is meant thereby, a part of which
is to the present day called Thy or Thyland. 5. The opinion of Rudbeck
and of Calstron, borrowed originally from Procopius, that this is a
general name for the whole of Scandinavia. 6. That of Gosselin, who
thinks that under this name Mainland, the principal of the Shetland
Islands, is meant. It is by no means impossible that under the name of
Thule two or more of these localities may have been meant, by different
authors writing at distant periods and under different states of
geographical knowledge. It is also pretty generally acknowledged, as
Parisot remarks, that the Thule mentioned by Ptolemy is identical with
Thylemark in Norway.
[2945] B. ii. c. 77.
[2946] Brotier thinks that under this name a part of Cornwall is meant,
and that it was erroneously supposed to be an island. Parisot is of
opinion that the copyists, or more probably Pliny himself, has made an
error in transcribing Mictis for Vectis, the name of the Isle of Wight.
It is not improbable however that the island of Mictis had only an
imaginary existence.
[2947] “White lead”: not, however, the metallic substance which we
understand by that name, but tin.
[2948] Commonly known as “coracles,” and used by the Welch in modern
times. See B. vii. c. 57 of this work, and the Note.
[2949] Brotier, with many other writers, takes these names to refer to
various parts of the coast of Norway. Scandia he considers to be the
same as Scania, Bergos the modern Bergen, and Nerigos the northern part
of Norway. On the other hand, Gosselin is of opinion that under the
name of Bergos the Scottish island of Barra is meant, and under that
of Nerigos, the island of Lewis, the northern promontory of which is
in the old maps designated by the name of Nary or Nery. Ptolemy makes
mention of an island called Doumna in the vicinity of the Orcades.
[2950] Transalpine Gaul, with the exception of that part of it called
Narbonensis, was called Gallia Comata, from the custom of the people
allowing their hair to grow to a great length.
[2951] From the Scheldt to the Seine.
[2952] From the Seine to the Garonne.
[2953] Lyonese Gaul, from Lugdunum, the ancient name of the city of
Lyons.
[2954] Said by Camden to be derived from the Celtic words _Ar - mor_,
“by the Sea.”
[2955] The provinces of Antwerp and North Brabant.
[2956] Inhabiting Western Flanders.
[2957] So called, it is supposed, from the Celtic word _Mor_, which
means “the sea.” Térouane and Boulogne are supposed to occupy the site
of their towns, situate in the modern Pas de Calais.
[2958] D’Anville places them between Calais and Gravellines, in the Pas
de Calais, and on the spot now known as the Terre de Marck or Merk.
[2959] Boulogne, previously mentioned.
[2960] Cluver thinks that “Brianni” would be the correct reading here;
but D’Anville places the Britanni on the southern bank of the stream
called La Canche in the Pas de Calais.
[2961] According to Parisot and Ansart they occupied the department of
the Somme, with places on the site of Amiens (derived from their name)
and Abbeville for their chief towns.
[2962] They dwelt in the modern department of the Oise, with Beauvais
(which still retains their name) for their chief town.
[2963] D’Anville is of opinion that the place called Haiz or Hez in
the diocese of Beauvais, received its name from this people, of whom
nothing else is known. The name is omitted in several of the editions.
[2964] D’Anville is of opinion that their chief town was situate at the
modern Chaours, at the passage of the river Serre, not far from Vervins
in the department of the Aisne.
[2965] According to Ptolemy their chief town would be on the site of
the modern Orchies in the department du Nord, but Cæsar makes it to be
Nemetacum, the modern Arras, the capital of the department of the Pas
de Calais.
[2966] According to Ansart their chief town was Bavai, in the
department du Nord. They are called “Liberi,” or free, because they
were left at liberty to enjoy their own laws and institutions.
[2967] Their capital was Augusta Veromanduorum, and it has been
suggested that the place called Vermand, in the department de l’Aisne,
denotes its site; but according to Bellay and D’Anville the city of St.
Quentin, which was formerly called Aouste, marks the spot.
[2968] Nothing whatever is known of them, and it is suggested by
the commentators that this is a corrupted form of the name of the
Suessiones, which follows.
[2969] They gave name to Soissons in the southern part of the
department de l’Aisne.
[2970] It has been suggested that these are the same as the
Silvanectes, the inhabitants of Senlis in the department de l’Oise.
[2971] The people of Tongres, in the provinces of Namur, Liège, and
Limbourg.
[2972] They are supposed to have dwelt in the eastern part of the
province of Limbourg.
[2973] They probably dwelt between the Sunuci and the Betasi.
[2974] They are supposed to have dwelt in the western part of the
province of Limbourg, on the confines of that province and South
Brabant, in the vicinity probably of the place which still bears the
name of Beetz, upon the river Gette, between Leau and Haclen, seven
miles to the east of Louvain.
[2975] According to Ptolemy the Leuci dwelt on the sites of Toul in the
department of the Meurthe, and of Nais or Nays in that of the Meuse.
[2976] From them Trèves or Trier, in the Grand Duchy of the Lower
Rhine, takes its name.
[2977] Their chief town was on the site of Langres, in the department
of the Haute Marne.
[2978] They gave name to the city of Rheims in the department of the
Marne.
[2979] Their chief town stood on the site of the modern Metz, in the
department of the Moselle.
[2980] Besançon stands on the site of their chief town, in the
department of the Doubs, extending as far as Bâle.
[2981] The inhabitants of the district called the Haut Rhin or Higher
Rhine.
[2982] The inhabitants of the west of Switzerland.
[2983] Or the “Equestrian Colony,” probably founded by the Roman
Equites. It is not known where this colony was situate, but it is
suggested by Cluver and Monetus that it may have been on the lake of
Geneva, in the vicinity of the modern town of Nyon.
[2984] Littré, in a note, remarks that Rauriaca is a barbarism, and
that the reading properly is “Raurica.”
[2985] Spire was their chief city, in the province of the Rhine.
[2986] They are supposed to have occupied Strasbourg, and the greater
part of the department of the Lower Rhine.
[2987] They dwelt in the modern Grand Duchy of Hesse Darmstadt; Worms
was their chief city.
[2988] That is, nearer the mouths of the Rhine.
[2989] They originally dwelt on the right bank of the Rhine, but were
transported across the river by Agrippa in B.C. 37, at their own
request, from a wish to escape the attacks of the Suevi.
[2990] Now known as the city of Cologne. It took its name from
Agrippina, the wife of Claudius and the mother of Nero, who was born
there, and who, as Tacitus says, to show off her power to the allied
nations, planted a colony of veteran soldiers in her native city, and
gave to it her own name.
[2991] Their district was in the modern circle of Clèves, in the
province of Juliers-Berg-Clèves.
[2992] Dwelling in the Insula Batavorum, mentioned in C. 29 of the
present Book.
[2993] He first speaks of the nations on the coast, and then of those
more in the interior.
[2994] Dwelling in the west of the department of Calvados, and the east
of the department of the Eure. From them Lisieux takes its name.
[2995] They occupied the department of the Lower Seine.
[2996] They are supposed to have dwelt in the vicinity of Lillebonne,
in the department of the Lower Seine.
[2997] They gave name to the town of Vannes in the department of
Morbihan.
[2998] From them the city of Avranches, in the department of La Manche,
derives its name.
[2999] They occupied the modern department of Finisterre.
[3000] The Loire.
[3001] This spot is placed by D’Anville near the modern city of Saint
Brieuc. He refers here to the peninsula of Brittany, which ends in
Finisterre.
[3002] Ansart remarks that the circuit of the peninsula from Saint
Brieuc to the mouth of the river Vilaine is only 450 miles, but that if
taken from the city of Avranches to the mouth of the Loire, it is 650.
[3003] Ansart states that from Avranches to the mouth of the Loire, in
a straight line, is twenty miles less than the distance here given by
Pliny.
[3004] Inhabitants of the department of the Lower Loire or Loire
Inférieure.
[3005] This extensive people inhabited the present departments of the
Saone et Loire, Allier, Nievre, Rhone nord, and Loire nord. Autun and
Chalons-sur-Marne stand on the site of their ancient towns.
[3006] They inhabited the departments of the Eure et Loire, and
portions of those of the Seine et Oise, of the Loire et Cher, and of the
Loiret. Chartres occupies the site of their town.
[3007] They occupied a part of the department of the Allier. Moulins
stands on the site of their chief town.
[3008] Sens, in the department of the Yonne, stands on the site of
their chief town.
[3009] The chief town of the Aulerci Eburovices was on the site of the
present Passy-sur-Eure, called by the inhabitants Old Evreux, in the
department of the Eure.
[3010] They dwelt in the vicinity of the city of Le Mans, in the
department of the Sarthe.
[3011] Meaux, in the department of the Seine et Marne, denotes the site
of their principal town.
[3012] Paris, anciently Lutetia, denotes their locality.
[3013] The city of Troyes, in the department of the Aube, denotes their
locality.
[3014] Their chief town stood on the site of Angers, in the department
of the Maine et Loire.
[3015] D’Anville says that their chief town stood on the spot now known
as Vieux, two leagues from Caen, in the department of Calvados.
[3016] The reading here is not improbably “Vadicasses.” If so, they
were a people situate at a great distance from the other tribes here
mentioned by Pliny. They dwelt in the department De l’Oise, in the
district formerly known as Valois, their chief town or city occupying
the site of Vez, not far from Villers Cotterets.
[3017] D’Anville assigns to the Venelli, or Unelli, as some readings
have it, the former district of Cotantin, now called the department of
La Manche.
[3018] According to D’Anville, Corseuil, two leagues from Dinan, in the
department of the Côtes du Nord, denotes the site of their chief town.
Hardouin takes Quimper to mark the locality.
[3019] They are supposed by Ansart to have occupied that part of the
department of La Mayenne where we find the village of Jublains, two
leagues from the city of Mayenne.
[3020] D’Anville assigns to them the greater part of the department of
the Ile et Vilaine, and is of opinion that the city of Rennes occupies
the site of Condate, their chief town.
[3021] Tours, in the department of the Indre et Loire, marks the site
of their chief town.
[3022] They are supposed to have occupied a portion of the department
of the Loire.
[3023] They probably occupied a part of the department of the Loire, as
also of that of the Rhone. Their town, Forum Secusianorum, stood on the
site of the present Feurs, in the department of the Loire.
[3024] The city of Lyons occupies the site of ancient Lugdunum. It
is suggested by Hardouin, that the name Lugdunum is a corruption of
“Lucudunum,” a compound of the Latin word _lucus_, “a grove,” and the
Celtic _dun_, “a hill” or “mountain.”
[3025] They are mentioned by Cæsar (B. C. iii. 9), in conjunction with
the Nannetes, Morini, and others, but nothing can be inferred as to the
precise position they occupied.
[3026] Their locality also is unknown, but it is supposed that they
dwelt in the vicinity of the department of La Vendée.
[3027] From them ancient Poitou received its name. They are supposed to
have occupied the department of the Haute-Vienne, and portions of the
departments of La Vendée, the Loire Inférieure, the Maine et Loire, the
Deux-Sèvres, and La Vienne.
[3028] They gave name to the former Saintonge, now the department of
Charente and Charente Inférieure. The town of Saintes occupies the site
of their chief town.
[3029] They occupied the modern department of the Gironde. The city of
Bordeaux occupies the site of their chief town.
[3030] They gave name to Aquitaine, which became corrupted into
Guyenne. Pliny is the only author that makes the Aquitani a distinct
people of the province of Aquitanica. The Tarusates are supposed to
have afterwards occupied the site here referred to by him, with Atures
for their chief town, afterwards called Aire, in the department of the
Landes.
[3031] Their locality is unknown, but it has been suggested that they
occupied the departments of the Basses Pyrénées, or Lower Pyrenees.
[3032] So called from the Latin verb _convenire_, “to assemble” or
“meet together.” They are said to have received this name from the
circumstance that Ptolemy, after the close of the Sertorian war,
finding a pastoral people of predatory habits inhabiting the range
of the Pyrenees, ordered them to unite together and form a community
in a town or city. From them the present town of Saint Bertrand de
Comminges, in the S.W. of the department of the Haute Garonne, derives
its Latin name “Lugdunum Convenarum.”
[3033] By Cæsar called the Bigerriones. Their name was preserved
in that of the district of Bigorre, now the department of the
Hautes-Pyrénées. Their chief town was Turba, now Tarbes.
[3034] By calling the Tarbelli _Quatuorsignani_, he seems to imply that
their chief town was a place garrisoned by four maniples of soldiers,
each with a _signum_ or standard. Aquæ Tarbellicæ was their chief town,
the modern Acqs or Dax, in the S.W. of the department of the Landes.
[3035] Their chief town was probably garrisoned by six _signa_ or
maniples. Cocosa, or Coequosa, as it is written in the Antonine
Itinerary, is the first place on a road from Aquæ Tarbellicæ or Dax to
Burdegala or Bordeaux, now called Marensin. Their locality was in the
southern part of the department of the Landes, the inhabitants of which
are still divided into two classes, the Bouges, those of the north, or
of the Tête de Buch; and the Cousiots, those of the south.
[3036] Their locality is unknown.
[3037] D’Anville would read “Onobusates,” and thinks that they dwelt in
the district called Nébousan, in the department of the Hautes Pyrénées.
He is also of opinion that their town stood on the site of the modern
Cioutat, between the rivers Adour and Neste.
[3038] They occupied the southern part of the department of the Gironde.
[3039] From them Hardouin suggests that Moneins, in the department of
the Basses Pyrénées, takes its name.
[3040] D’Anville is of opinion that they inhabited and gave name to
the Vallée d’Ossun, between the Pyrenees and the city of Oléron in the
department of the Basses Pyrénées.
[3041] D’Anville places them in the Vallée de Soule, in the department
of the Basses Pyrénées.
[3042] From them Campon, a place in the department of the Hautes
Pyrénées, is supposed to have received its name.
[3043] Biscarosse, not far from Tête de Buch in the department of the
Landes, is supposed to derive its name from this tribe.
[3044] Nothing whatever is known of them.
[3045] The more general reading is “Sassumini.” Ansart suggests that
the town of Sarrum, between Cognac and Périgueux, in the department of
the Dordogne, may have received its name from them.
[3046] Ansart suggests that Rieumes, in the department of the Haute
Garonne, occupies the site of Ryesium, their chief town, mentioned by
Ptolemy.
[3047] They are supposed to have given name to Tournay, in the
department of the Hautes Pyrénées.
[3048] Supposed to be the same as the Consuarini, mentioned in B. iii.
c. 5.
[3049] They probably gave name to Auch, in the department of Gers.
[3050] Their chief town occupied the site of Euse or Eause, in the
department of Gers.
[3051] Their locality is marked by Soz, in the department of the
Lot-et-Garonne.
[3052] Or “Oscidates of the Plains.” They probably gave name to Ossun,
two miles from Tarbes, in the department of the Hautes Pyrénées.
[3053] From them the village of Cestas, three leagues from Bordeaux, in
the department of the Gironde, is supposed to derive its name.
[3054] The village of Tursan, in the department of the Landes, probably
derived its name from this tribe.
[3055] Their town was Cossio, afterwards Vasates, now Bazas, in the
department of the Gironde.
[3056] The site of the Vassei and the Sennates appears to be unknown.
[3057] D’Anville is of opinion that this tribe gave name to Aisenay
or Azenay, a village four leagues distant from Bourbon-Vendée, in the
department of La Vendée.
[3058] They occupied the district formerly known as Berry, but now the
departments of the Indre, the Cher, and the west of the department of
the Allier. Their chief town was Avaricum, now Bourges.
[3059] They inhabited the district formerly known as the Limosin, now
the departments of the Creuse, the Haute Vienne, and the Corrèze. Their
chief town was Augustoritum, afterwards Lemovices, now Limoges.
[3060] They occupied the district formerly known as Auvergne, forming
the present department of the Allier, and the southern part of the
Puy de Dôme and the Cantal. Augustonemetum was their chief town, now
Clermont.
[3061] Situate in the district formerly known as Gevaudan, now the
department of La Lozère. Their chief town stood on the site of the
present small town of Javoulx, four leagues from Mende.
[3062] They are supposed to have occupied the former district of
Rouergue, now known as the department of Aveyron. Their chief town was
Segodunum, afterwards Ruteni, now known as Rhodez.
[3063] They occupied the former district of Querci, the present
department of Lot and Lot-et-Garonne. Divona, afterwards Cadurci, now
Cahors, was their principal town.
[3064] According to Ptolemy their town was Aginnum, probably the modern
Agen, in the present department of Lot-et-Garonne. “Antobroges,”
however, is the more common reading.
[3065] They occupied the district formerly known as Périgord, in
the department of the Dordogne; their town was Vesanna, afterwards
Petrocori, now Périgueux.
[3066] Ansart says they are about 200 in number, consisting of Belle
Isle, Groaix, Houat, Hoedic, and others. Also probably Morbihan.
[3067] The Isle of Oleron, the fountain-head of the maritime laws of
Europe.
[3068] He means to say that it gradually increases in breadth after
leaving the narrow neck of the Pyrenees and approaching the confines of
Lusitania.
[3069] B. iii. c. 3.
[3070] From Ruscino to Gades.
[3071] In the province now known as Guipuzcoa.
[3072] Supposed to be the present Cabo de la Higuera.
[3073] Probably inhabiting the eastern part of the provinces of Biscay
and Alava, the eastern portion of Navarre, and, perhaps, a part of the
province of Guipuzcoa.
[3074] According to Hardouin the modern San Sebastian occupies the site
of their town.
[3075] On the same site as the modern Bermeo, according to Mannert.
Hardouin thinks, however, and with greater probability, that it was
situate at the mouth of the river Orio.
[3076] D’Anville considers this to be the site of the city of Bermeo.
[3077] Poinsinet thinks that this is Flavio in Bilbao, D’Anville calls
it Portugalette, and Mannert thinks that it is the same as Santander,
with which opinion Ansart agrees.
[3078] According to Ptolemy, the Cantabri possessed the western part of
the province of La Montana, and the northern parts of the provinces of
Palencia and Toro.
[3079] Most probably the present Rio de Suancès, by Mannert called
the Saya, into which the Besanga flows. Hardouin however calls it the
Nervio.
[3080] Ansart suggests that this is the modern San Vicente de la
Barquera. If the river Sauga is the same with the Suancès, this cannot
be the port of Santander, as has been suggested.
[3081] Or Ebro.
[3082] According to Ansart, this is either the modern Ensenada de
Ballota or else the Puerta de Pô.
[3083] According to Ansart, the Orgenomesci occupied the same territory
which Ptolemy has assigned to the Cantabri in general. See Note [3078]
above.
[3084] Hardouin takes this to be Villaviciosa. Ansart thinks that Ria
de Cella occupies its site.
[3085] They are supposed to have occupied the greater part of the
principality of the Asturias and the province of Leon.
[3086] Hardouin and Mannert consider this to be identical with Navia
or Nava, six miles to the east of Oviedo, an obscure place in the
interior. Ansart however would identify it with Villaviciosa.
[3087] No doubt the headland now known as the Cabo de Penas.
[3088] Now Lugo in Gallicia.
[3089] Supposed by Ansart to be the Rio Caneiro, into which the Rio
Labio discharges itself.
[3090] Supposed by Ansart to have dwelt in the vicinity of the Celtic
promontory, now Cabo de Finisterra or Cape Finisterre. Of the Egovarri
and Iadoni nothing whatever is known.
[3091] Their towns are mentioned by Ptolemy as being situate on a bay
near Nerium or the promontory of Cape Finisterre.
[3092] Mannert thinks that the Nelo is the same as the Rio Allones; the
Florius seems not to have been identified.
[3093] The inhabitants of Cape Finisterre.
[3094] Dwelling on the banks of the river which from them takes its
modern name of Tambre.
[3095] Mannert and Ansart are of opinion that this peninsula was
probably the modern Cabo Taurinan or Cabo Villano, most probably the
latter.
[3096] On the occasion probably of his expedition against the Cantabri.
[3097] Their towns, Iria Flavia and Lacus Augusti, lay in the interior,
on the sites of the present Santiago de Compostella and Lugo.
[3098] Probably the modern Noya.
[3099] They are supposed to have occupied the district in which the
warm springs are found, which are known as Caldas de Contis and Caldas
de Rey.
[3100] It is suggested by Ansart that the islands here meant are those
called Carreira, at the mouth of the river Ulla, and the Islas de Ons,
at the mouth of the Tenario.
[3101] See B. iii. c. 4.
[3102] Inhabiting the vicinity of the modern Pontevedra.
[3103] According to Ptolemy also their town was Tudæ, the modern Tuy.
[3104] The modern Islas de Seyas or of Bayona.
[3105] The town of Bayona, about six leagues from the mouth of the
river Minho.
[3106] The Minho.
[3107] They occupied the tract of country lying between the rivers, and
known as Entre Douro y Minho.
[3108] Now Braga on the Cavado.
[3109] The Lima.
[3110] The river Douro.
[3111] See B. iii. c. 3.
[3112] Both lead, properly so called, and tin.
[3113] In a great degree corresponding with modern Portugal, except
that the latter includes the tract of country between the Minho and
Douro.
[3114] To distinguish them from the nation of the same name sprung
from them, and occupying the Farther Spain. (B. iii. c. 3.) The Pæsuri
occupied the site of the present towns of Lamego and Arouca.
[3115] The modern Vouga, which runs below the town of Aveiro, raised
from the ruins of ancient Talabrica.
[3116] Agueda, which, according to Hardouin, is the name of both the
river and the town.
[3117] Coimbra, formerly Condeja la Veja.
[3118] Leiria is supposed to occupy its site.
[3119] According to Hardouin, the modern Ebora de Alcobaza, ten leagues
from Leiria.
[3120] The modern Cabo de la Roca, seven leagues from Lisbon.
[3121] Pliny, in C. 34, places the Arrotrebæ, belonging to the
Conventus of Lucus Augusti, about the Promontorium Celticum, which,
if not the same as the Nerium (or Cape Finisterre) of the others, is
evidently in its immediate neighbourhood; but he confuses the whole
matter by a very curious error. He mentions a promontory called
Artabrum as the headland _at the N.W. extremity of Spain_; the coast
on the one side of it looking to the north and the Gallic Ocean, on
the other to the west and the Atlantic Ocean. But he considers this
promontory to be the west _headland of the estuary of the Tagus_,
and adds, that some called it _Magnum Promontorium_, or the “Great
Promontory,” and others Olisiponense, from the city of Olisipo, or
Lisbon. He assigns, in fact, all the west coast of Spain, down to the
mouth of the Tagus, to the north coast, and, instead of being led
to detect his error by the resemblance of name between his Artabrum
Promontorium and his Arrotrebæ (the Artabri of his predecessors, Strabo
and Mela), he perversely finds fault with those who had placed above
the promontory Artabrum, a people of the same name who never were there.
[3122] On the site of which the present city of Lisbon stands.
[3123] See note [3121] in the preceding page.
[3124] See note [3121].
[3125] See note [3116] in the preceding page.
[3126] Among these is Pomponius Mela, who confounds the river Limia,
mentioned in the last chapter, with the Æminius, or Agueda.
[3127] Now the river Mondego.
[3128] See B. xxxiii. c. 21.
[3129] Now Cape St. Vincent.
[3130] Pliny continues his error here, in taking part of the western
side of Spain for the north, and part of the southern coast for the
western.
[3131] B. iii. c. 2.
[3132] With the Vettones, situate in the province of the Alentejo. See
B. iii. c. 3.
[3133] In the present province of Algarve.
[3134] Now Lisbon. Both Strabo, Solinus, and Martianus Capella make
mention of a story that Ulysses came to Spain and founded this city.
[3135] See B. viii. c. 67 of the present work.
[3136] According to Hardouin, followed by D’Anville and Uckert, this
place gives name to Alcazar do Sal, nearly midway between Evora and the
sea-shore. Mannert says Setuval, which D’Anville however supposes to be
the ancient Cetobriga.
[3137] On its site stands Santiago de Cacem, nearly midway between
Lisbon and Cape St. Vincent.
[3138] Or the “Wedge,” generally supposed to be Cabo de Santa Maria.
Ansart however thinks that it is the Punta de Sagres, near Cape St.
Vincent. Pliny’s words indeed seem to imply a closer proximity than
that of Capes St. Vincent and Santa Maria.
[3139] According to Hardouin, the modern Estombar; according to
D’Anville, in the vicinity of Faro; but ten leagues from that place,
according to Mannert.
[3140] Hardouin and D’Anville are of opinion that Tavira occupies its
site.
[3141] Now Mertola, on the river Guadiana.
[3142] Now Merida, on the Guadiana. A colony of veterans (Emeriti) was
planted there by Augustus.
[3143] Now Medellin, in the province of Estremadura.
[3144] Pax Julia, or Pax Augusta, in the country of the Turduli, or
Turdetani; now Beja, in the province of the Alentejo.
[3145] Now Alcantara, in the province of Estremadura.
[3146] Now Truxillo, so called from Turris Julia.
[3147] Now Caceres.
[3148] Now called Santarem, from Saint Irene, the Virgin.
[3149] “The Garrison of Julius.”
[3150] “The Success of Julius.”
[3151] Evora, between the Guadiana and the Tagus.
[3152] “The Liberality of Julius.”
[3153] B. iii. c. 3.
[3154] Hardouin takes Augustobriga to have stood on the site of Villar
del Pedroso on the Tagus. Other writers think that it is represented by
the present Ponte del Arcobispo.
[3155] From Ammia, now Portalegre, on the frontier of Portugal. The
sites of Arabrica and Balsa do not appear to have been ascertained.
[3156] Capera stood on the site now called Las Ventas de Capara,
between Alcantara and Coria. The site of Cæsarobrica has not been
ascertained.
[3157] Coria, in Estremadura, probably occupies the site of Caura.
[3158] Hardouin suggests that the modern Tomar occupies the site of
Concordia.
[3159] Mannert is of opinion that the city of Lancia was situate in
the north of Lusitania, on the river Durius, or Douro, near the modern
Zamora.
[3160] To distinguish them from the Mirobrigenses, surnamed Turduli,
mentioned in B. iii. c. 3. Some writers think that this Mirobriga is
the present Ciudad Rodrigo; but Ambrose Morales takes it to be the
place called Malabriga, in the vicinity of that city.
[3161] The name of Medubriga was afterwards Aramenha, of which Hardouin
says the ruins only were to be seen. They were probably called
_Plumbarii_, from lead mines in their vicinity.
[3162] According to Hardouin, Ocelum was in the vicinity of the modern
Capara.
[3163] From Cape de Creuz to the Promontory between the cities of
Fontarabia and Saint Sebastian.
[3164] From the Greek κασσίτερος, “tin.” It is generally supposed that
the “Tin Islands” were the Scilly Isles, in the vicinity of Cornwall.
At the same time the Greek and Roman geographers, borrowing their
knowledge from the accounts probably of the Phœnician merchants, seem
to have had a very indistinct notion of their precise locality, and to
have thought them to be nearer to Spain than to Britain. Thus we find
Strabo, in B. iii., saying, that “the Cassiterides are ten in number,
lying near each other in the ocean, towards the north _from the haven
of the Artabri_.” From a comparison of the accounts, it would almost
appear that the ancient geographers confused the Scilly Islands with
the Azores, as those, who enter into any detail, attribute to the
Cassiterides the characteristics almost as much of the Azores and the
sea in their vicinity, as of the Scilly Islands.
[3165] Cape Finisterre.
[3166] Or the “Islands of the Blest.” We cannot do better than quote a
portion of the article on this subject in Dr. Smith’s “Dictionary of
Ancient Geography.” “‘Fortunatæ Insulæ’ is one of those geographical
names whose origin is lost in mythic darkness, but which afterwards
came to have a specific application, so closely resembling the old
mythical notion, as to make it almost impossible to doubt that that
notion was based, in part at least, on some vague knowledge of the
regions afterwards discovered. The earliest Greek poetry places the
abode of the happy departed spirits far beyond the entrance of the
Mediterranean, at the extremity of the earth, and upon the shores of
the river Oceanus, or in islands in its midst; and Homer’s poetical
description of the place may be applied almost word for word to those
islands in the Atlantic, off the west coast of Africa, to which the
name was given in the historical period. (Od. iv. l. 563, _seq._)
‘There the life of mortals is most easy; there is no snow, nor winter,
nor much rain, but Ocean is ever sending up the shrill breathing
breezes of Zephyrus to refresh men.’ Their delicious climate, and their
supposed identity of situation, marked out the Canary Islands, the
Madeira group, and the Azores, as worthy to represent the Islands of
the Blest. In the more specific sense, however, the name was applied
to the two former groups; while, in its widest application, it may
have even included the Cape de Verde Islands, its extension being in
fact adapted to that of maritime discovery.” Pliny gives a further
description of them in B. vi. c. 37.
[3167] The strait between the island and the mainland is now called the
River of Saint Peter. The circuit of the island, as stated by Pliny,
varies in the MSS. from fifteen to twenty-five miles, and this last is
probably correct.
[3168] Julius Cæsar, on his visit to the city of Gades, during the
Civil War in Spain, B.C. 49, conferred the citizenship of Rome on all
the citizens of Gades. Under Augustus it became a _municipium_, with
the title of ‘Augusta urbs Julia Gaditana.’ The modern city of Cadiz is
built upon its site.
[3169] Or the Island of Venus.
[3170] From the Greek word κότινος, “an olive-tree.”
[3171] If Gades was not the same as Tartessus (probably the Tarshish of
Scripture), its exact locality is a question in dispute. Most ancient
writers place it at the mouth of the river Bætis, while others identify
it, and perhaps with more probability, with the city of Carteia, on
Mount Calpe, the Rock of Gibraltar. The whole country west of Gibraltar
was called Tartessis. See B. iii. c. 3.
[3172] Or more properly ‘Agadir,’ or ‘Hagadir.’ It probably received
this name, meaning a ‘hedge,’ or ‘bulwark,’ from the fact of its being
the chief Phœnician colony outside of the Pillars of Hercules.
[3173] Of Erythræa, or Erytheia. The monster Geryon, or Geryones,
fabled to have had three bodies, lived in the fabulous Island of
Erytheia, or the “Red Isle,” so called because it lay under the rays of
the setting sun in the west. It was originally said to be situate off
the coast of Epirus, but was afterwards identified either with Gades
or the Balearic islands, and was at all times believed to be in the
distant west. Geryon was said to have been the son of Chrysaor, the
wealthy king of Iberia.
[3174] Alluding to B. iii. c. 6. From Rhegium to the Alps. But _there_
the reading is 1020.
[3175] Meaning Gessoriacum, the present Boulogne. He probably calls it
_Britannicum_, from the circumstance that the Romans usually embarked
there for the purpose of crossing over to Britain.
[3176] The present Santen in the Duchy of Cleves.
[3177] See end of B. iii.
[3178] See end of B. ii.
[3179] See end of B. iii.
[3180] See end of B. iii.
[3181] See end of B. iii.
[3182] See end of B. ii.
[3183] See end of B. iii.
[3184] See end of B. iii.
[3185] See end of B. iii.
[3186] See end of B. ii.
[3187] See end of B. iii.
[3188] See end of B. iii.
[3189] Ateius, surnamed _Prætextatus_, and also Philologus, which
last name he assumed to indicate his learning, was born at Athens,
and was one of the most celebrated grammarians of Rome, in the latter
part of the first century B.C. He was originally a freedman of the
jurist Ateius Capito, by whom he was described as “a rhetorician among
grammarians, and a grammarian among rhetoricians.” He was on terms of
intimacy with Sallust the historian, and Asinius Pollio. It is supposed
that he assisted Sallust in the compilation of his history; but to what
extent is not known. But few of his numerous commentaries were extant
even in the time of Suetonius.
[3190] A native of Megalopolis in Arcadia, born about B.C. 204. He was
trained probably in political knowledge and the military art under
Philopœmen, and was sent, as a prisoner to Rome, with others, to answer
the charge of not aiding the Romans in their war against Perseus. Here,
by great good fortune, he secured the friendship of Scipio Africanus,
with whom he was present at the destruction of Carthage. His history is
one of the most valuable works that has come down to us from antiquity.
[3191] Of Miletus, one of the earliest and most distinguished Greek
historians and geographers. He lived about the 65th Olympiad, or
B.C. 520. A few fragments, quoted, are all that are left of his
historical and geographical works. There is little doubt that Herodotus
extensively availed himself of this writer’s works, though it is
equally untrue that he has transcribed whole passages from him, as
Porphyrius has ventured to assert.
[3192] Of Mitylene, supposed to have flourished about B.C. 450. He
appears to have written numerous geographical and historical works,
which, with the exception of a considerable number of fragments, are
lost.
[3193] Of Sigæum, a Greek historian, contemporary with Herodotus. He
wrote a history of Greece, and several other works, all of which, with
a few unimportant exceptions, are lost.
[3194] See end of B. ii.
[3195] See end of B. ii.
[3196] A Rhodian by birth. He was admiral of the fleet of Ptolemy
Philadelphus, who reigned from B.C. 285 to 247. He wrote a work “On
Harbours,” in ten books, which was copied by Eratosthenes, and is
frequently quoted by ancient writers. Strabo also says that he composed
poetry.
[3197] See end of B. ii.
[3198] Of Cumæ, or Cymæ, in Ionia. He flourished about B.C. 408. He
studied under Isocrates, and gained considerable fame as a historian.
Though anxious to disclose the truth, he has been accused of sometimes
forcing his authorities to suit his own views. Of his history of
Greece, and his essays on various subjects, a few fragments only
survive.
[3199] A grammarian of Mallus, in Cilicia. He lived in the time of
Ptolemy Philopater, and resided at Pergamus, under the patronage of
Eumenes II. and Attalus II. In his grammatical system he made a strong
distinction between _criticism_ and _grammar_, the latter of which
sciences he regarded as quite subordinate to the former. Of his learned
commentaries on the Iliad and the Odyssey, only a few fragments have
come down to us.
[3200] See end of B. ii.
[3201] Of Cyrene, an Alexandrian grammarian and poet. He flourished at
Alexandria, whither Ptolemy Philadelphus had invited him to a place
in the Museum. Of his Hymns and Epigrams many are still extant. His
Elegies, which were of considerable poetical merit, with the exception
of a few fragments, have all perished. Of his numerous other works in
prose, not one is extant in an entire state.
[3202] See end of B. ii.
[3203] Probably Apollodorus of Artemita, in Mesopotamia. It is probably
to him that a Treatise on Islands and Cities has been ascribed by
Tzetzes, as also a History of the Parthians, and a History of Pontus.
[3204] Probably the author of that name, who wrote the History of
Cyzicus, is the person here referred to. He is called by Athenæus both
a Babylonian and a Cyzican. His work is entirely lost; but it appears
to have been extensively read, and is referred to by Cicero and other
ancient writers.
[3205] Of Neapolis. He wrote a History of Hannibal, and to him has
been ascribed a Description of the Universe, of which a fragment still
survives.
[3206] Of Tauromenium, in Sicily; a celebrated historian, who
flourished about the year B.C. 300. He was banished from Sicily by
Agathocles, and passed his exile at Athens. He composed a History of
Sicily, from the earliest times to the year B.C. 264. The value of his
history has been gravely attacked by Polybius; but there is little
doubt that it possessed very considerable merit. Of this, and other
works of Timæus, only a few fragments survive.
[3207] A Greek historian; a native of Lesbos. When he lived is unknown.
Dionysius, of Halicarnassus, has borrowed from him a portion of his
account of the Pelasgians. He is said to have been the author of the
notion that the Tyrrhenians, in consequence of their wanderings after
they left their original settlement, got the name of πελαργοὶ, or
“storks.” He is supposed to have written a History of Lesbos, as also a
work called “Historical Paradoxes.”
[3208] See end of B. iii.
[3209] See end of B. iii.
[3210] Of this author nothing whatever seems to be known.
[3211] Of Miletus, born B.C. 610. One of the earliest philosophers of
the Ionian school, and said to be a pupil of Thales. Unless Pherecydes
of Scyros be an exception, he was the first author of a philosophical
treatise in Greek prose. Other writings are ascribed to him by Suidas;
but, no doubt, on insufficient grounds. Of his treatise, which seems to
have contained summary statements of his opinions, no remains exist.
[3212] Of this writer nothing whatever is known, beyond the fact that,
from his name, he seems to have been a native of Mallus, in Cilicia.
[3213] It seems impossible to say which, out of the vast number of
the authors who bore this name, is the one here referred to. It is
not improbable that Dionysius of Chalcis, a Greek historian who lived
before the Christian era, is meant. He wrote a work on the Foundation
of Towns, in five books, which is frequently referred to by the
ancients. It is not probable that the author of the Periegesis, or
“Description of the World,” is referred to, as that book bears internal
marks of having been compiled in the third or fourth century of the
Christian era.
[3214] Of Miletus. He was the author of the “Milesiaca,” a romance of
licentious character, which was translated into Latin by L. Cornelius
Sisenna. He is looked upon as the inventor of the Greek romance, and
the title of his work is supposed to have given rise to the term
_Milesian_, as applied to works of fiction.