CHAPTER XI.

CALLISTHENES OPPOSES THE PROPOSAL TO HONOUR ALEXANDER BY PROSTRATION.

When Anaxarchus had uttered these remarks and others of a similar

kind, those who were privy to the plan applauded his speech, and

wished at once to begin the ceremony of prostration. Most of the

Macedonians, however, were vexed[555] at the speech and kept silence.

But Callisthenes interposed and said:—“O Anaxarchus, I openly declare

that there is no honour which Alexander is unworthy to receive,

provided that it is consistent with his being human; but men have made

distinctions between those honours which are due to men, and those due

to gods, in many different ways, as for instance by the building of

temples and by the erection of statues. Moreover for the gods sacred

enclosures are selected, to them sacrifice is offered, and to them

libations are made. Hymns also are composed in honour of the gods, and

eulogies for men. But the greatest distinction is made by the custom

of prostration. For it is the practice that men should be kissed by

those who salute them[556]; but because the deity is located somewhere

above, it is not lawful even to touch him, and this is the reason no

doubt why he is honoured by prostration. Bands of choral dancers are

also appointed for the gods, and paeans are sung in their honour. And

this is not at all wonderful, seeing that certain honours are specially

assigned to some of the gods and certain others to other gods, and,

by Zeus, quite different ones again are assigned to heroes, which are

very distinct from those paid to the deities.[557] It is not therefore

reasonable to confound all these distinctions without discrimination,

exalting men to a rank above their condition by extravagant

accumulation of honours, and debasing the gods, as far as lies in human

power, to an unseemly level, by paying them honours only equal to those

paid to men.” He said that Alexander would not endure the affront, if

some private individual were to be thrust into his royal honours by an

unjust vote, either by show of hand or by ballot. Much more justly then

would the gods be indignant at those mortals who usurp divine honours

or suffer themselves to be thrust into them by others. “Alexander not

only seems to be, but is in reality beyond any competition the bravest

of brave men, of kings the most kingly, and of generals the most worthy

to command an army. O Anaxarchus, it was thy duty, rather than any

other man’s, to become the special advocate of these arguments now

adduced by me, and the opponent of those contrary to them, seeing that

thou associatest with him for the purpose of imparting philosophy and

instruction. Therefore it was unseemly to begin this discussion, when

thou oughtest to have remembered that thou art not associating with

and giving advice to Cambyses or Xerxes, but to the son of Philip, who

derives his origin from Heracles and Aeacus,[558] whose ancestors came

into Macedonia from Argos, and have continued to rule the Macedonians,

not by force, but by law. Not even to Heracles himself while still

alive were divine honours paid by the Greeks; and even after his death

they were withheld until a decree had been published by the oracle of

the god at Delphi that men should honour Heracles as a god. But if,

because the discussion is held[559] in the land of foreigners, we ought

to adopt the sentiments of foreigners, I demand, O Alexander, that thou

shouldst bethink thyself of Greece, for whose sake the whole of this

expedition was undertaken by thee, that thou mightest join Asia to

Greece. Therefore make up thy mind whether thou wilt return thither and

compel the Greeks, who are men most devoted to freedom, to pay thee the

honour of prostration, or whether thou wilt keep aloof from Greece, and

inflict this honour on the Macedonians alone, or thirdly whether thou

wilt thyself make a difference in every respect as to the honours to

be paid thee, so as to be honoured by the Greeks and Macedonians as a

human being and after the manner of the Greeks, and by foreigners alone

after the foreign fashion of prostration. But if it is said that Cyrus,

son of Cambyses, was the first man to whom the honour of prostration

was paid, and that afterwards this degrading ceremony continued in

vogue among the Persians and Medes, we ought to bear in mind that

the Scythians, men poor but independent, chastised that Cyrus;[560]

that other Scythians again chastised Darius, as the Athenians and

Lacedaemonians did Xerxes, as Clearchus and Xenophon with their 10,000

followers did Artaxerxes; and finally, that Alexander, though not

honoured with prostration, has conquered this Darius.”

The Anabasis of Alexander · 第 11 / 33 章