OPPRESSIVE TAXATION UNDER HENRY I. (1105).

=Source.=--Eadmer, _Historia Novorum in Anglia_, ed. Rule, p. 184.

(Rolls Series.)

The character and number of the burdens, under which the whole of

England was crushed at this time, are difficult, I know, to describe.

For the king, leaving Normandy because he could not conquer the whole

of it by the means described above,[28] returned to England to collect

larger supplies of money with which he might go back and subdue the

remainder, disinheriting his brother. In the levying of this money the

collectors showed no regard for pity or mercy, but all men suffered a

ruthless and outrageous exaction, as those who came to us testified.

Indeed you might have seen men who had nothing to give driven from

their own homes, or the doors of their houses torn off and carried

away, and themselves exposed to wholesale plunder; or they were reduced

to extreme poverty, their mean furniture being seized, or at any rate

persecuted and tortured in other shameful ways. Against those who

were thought to have any wealth certain new and ingeniously devised

penalties were charged, and so, when they dared not venture to implead

the king for the defence of their land, their possessions were seized

and themselves reduced to serious distress. But these measures perhaps

will be deemed slight by some, because they were not peculiar to

king Henry’s reign; many a like oppression had been committed under

his brother, not to mention his father king William. Yet they were

thought harder and more intolerable, because much less than usual was

found to be extracted from a people already despoiled and exhausted.

But further, in the council of London ... all priests and monks of

England had been prohibited from marriage, and this prohibition,

during Anselm’s exile, had been violated by many, who still retained

or at least took back their wives. The king, refusing to allow this

sin to go unpunished, ordered his ministers to implead the offenders

and take fines from them to expiate their sin. But since many of them

were found innocent of this offence, the money demanded for the king’s

use amounted to a smaller sum than the collectors could have desired.

Therefore they changed their plan, the innocent were involved with the

guilty in a universal charge, and all parish churches were put in the

king’s debt and every one ordered to be redeemed by the parson who

served God therein. It was pitiful to behold. When the fury of this

exaction was at its height, and some men, who either had nothing to

give, or, in detestation of the outrageous measure, refused to give on

such a ground, and were contemptuously robbed, imprisoned and tortured,

the king chanced to come to London; there nearly two hundred priests

assembled, it is said, robed in their albs and priestly stoles, and

with naked feet approached the king on his way to the palace. But,

as it happened, his thoughts were much occupied, and he was entirely

unmoved to pity by their prayers, or at any rate deemed them unworthy

of the honour of an answer, as if they were men destitute of all

religion, and ordered them to be driven at once out of his sight. Their

confusion thus worse confounded, they approached the queen and begged

her to intercede; but though, it is said, she was moved by pity to

tears, she was held back by fear from intervening.

The Normans in England (1066-1154) · 第 82 / 111 题