2. Strengthening of the lay element in all synods; and

3. Abolition of the equality of small village communities with

large town communities

the first was by far the most important and serious in its

consequences, but the other two bore fruit through the decree

that two-thirds of the members of the district and provincial

synods should be laymen, and the other one-third should be freely

elected to the district synod from the populous town communities,

for the provincial synods from the larger district synods.

Also in reference to the rights belonging to the several grades

of synods, considerable modifications were made, whereby the

privileges of communities were variously increased (_e.g._ to

them was given the right of refusing to introduce the catechisms

and hymn-books sanctioned by the provincial synods), while those

of the district and provincial synods were lessened in favour

of the general synod, and those of the latter again in favour

of the high church council and the minister of public worship.

After nearly four weeks’ discussion the bill without any serious

amendments was passed by the assembly, and on January 20th, 1876,

received the royal assent and became an ecclesiastical law.

But in order to give it also the rank of a law of the state,

a decision of the States’ Parliament on the relation of church

and state was necessary. The parliament had already in 1874,

when the original congregational and synodal constitution was

submitted to it, in order to advance the movement, approved

only the congregational constitution with provisional refusal

of everything going beyond that. In May, 1876, the bill already

raised by the king into an ecclesiastical law, passed both houses

of parliament, and had here also some amendments introduced with

the effect of increasing and strengthening the prerogative of

the state. The main points in the law as then passed are these:

The general synod, whose members undertake to fulfil their

duties agreeably to the word of God and the ordinances of the

evangelical national church, has the task of maintaining and

advancing the state church on the basis of the evangelical

confession. The laws of the state church must receive its assent,

but any measure agreed upon by it cannot be laid before the king

for his sanction without the approval of the minister of public

worship. It meets every sixth year; in the interval it, as well

as the provincial synods, is represented by a synodal committee

chosen from its members. The head of the church government is

the Supreme Church Council, whose president countersigns the

ecclesiastical laws approved by the king. The right of appointing

to this office lies with the minister of public worship; in

the nomination of other members the president makes proposals

with consent of the minister. Taxation of the general synod for

parliamentary purposes needs the assent of the minister of state,

and must, if it exceeds four per cent. of the class and income

tax, be agreed to by the Lower House, which also annually has

to determine the expenditure on ecclesiastical administration.

§ 193.6. When preparations were being made for the extraordinary

general synod, the king had repeatedly given vigorous expression

to his positive religious standpoint, and from the proposed

lists of members for that synod submitted by the minister of

public worship all names belonging to the _Protestantenverein_

were struck out. Still more decidedly in 1877 did he show

his disapproval in the Rhode-Hossbach troubles (§ 180, 4), by

declaring his firm belief in the divinity of Christ, and when the

then president of the Brandenburg consistory, Hegel, tendered his

resignation, owing to differences with the liberal president of

the Supreme Church Council, Hermann, the king refused to accept

it, because he could not then spare any such men as held by

the apostolic faith. In May, 1878, Hermann was at last, after

repeated solicitations, allowed to retire, Dr. Hermes, member of

the Supreme Church Council, was nominated his successor, and the

positive tendency of the Supreme Church Council was strengthened

by the admission of the court preachers, Kögel and Baur. His

proposals again disagreeing with the royal nominations for the

provincial synod and for the =First Ordinary General Synod= of

autumn, 1879, led the minister of public worship, Dr. Falk, at

last, after repeated solicitation, to accept his resignation.

It was granted him in July, 1879, and the chief president of the

province of Silesia, =Von Puttkamer=, a more decided adherent

of the positive union party, was named as his successor;

but in June, 1881, he was made minister of the interior, and

the undersecretary of the department of public worship, =Von

Gossler=, was made minister. The general synod, October 10th

till November 3rd, consisted of fifty-two confessionalists,

seventy-six positive-unionists, fifty-six of the middle party

or evangelical unionist, and nine from the ranks of the left,

the _Protestantenverein_; three confessionalists, twelve

positive-unionists, and fifteen of the middle party were

nominated by the king. The measures proposed by the Supreme

Church Council:

1. A marriage service without reference to the preceding civil

marriage, with two marriage formulæ, the first a joint

promise, the second a benediction;

2. A disciplinary law against despisers of baptism and marriage,

which threatened such with the loss of all ecclesiastical

electoral rights, and eventually with exclusion from the

Lord’s supper and sponsor rights; and

Church History, Volume 3 (of 3) · 第 45 / 74 题