Buddhism, the only one of the world-religions which, springing from an

abstruse system of metaphysics, brought forth such practical fruits as

truthfulness, honesty, loving-kindness and universal pity, spread with

extraordinary rapidity not only throughout the Indian continent but over

the entire civilised world. Its apostles[150] visited foreign countries,

touching and converting by their example the hearts and minds of those

who were incapable of weighing their arguments, or unwilling to listen to

their exhortations. They introduced a mild, tolerant, humane spirit

whithersoever they went, preaching entire equality, practising perfect

toleration, founding houses for meditation, erecting hospitals and

dispensaries for sick men and beasts, cultivating useful plants and

trees, gently suppressing cruelty to animals under any pretext,[151] and

generally sowing seeds of sympathy and brotherly love of which history

has noticed and described but the final fruits. From the earliest

recorded period Indian culture manifested a natural tendency to expand,

which was intensified at various times by the comparatively low ebb of

civilisation in the adjoining countries. One can readily conceive,

therefore, the effects of the strenuous and persevering efforts of one of

the most powerful Indian monarchs, Açoka Piyadassi,[152] king of Magadha,

to propagate that aspect of his country's civilisation which is

indissolubly bound up with the doctrines of the Buddha.

Açoka, grandson of the great king Tshandragupta, was the first monarch

who openly accepted the tenets and conscientiously practised the precepts

of the profoundest religious teacher ever born of woman; and no more

eloquent testimony could well be offered to the sincerity of the royal

convert than the well-nigh miraculous self-restraint with which he

forebore to cajole or coerce those of his subjects whom his arguments

failed to convince. Satisfied with the progress of the new religion in

his native place, he despatched his son, Mahindo, to introduce it into

Ceylon; and so successful were the young prince's missionary efforts that

that island became and remains the chief seat of Buddhism to this day.

Açoka next turned his attention to foreign countries, in which traders,

travellers, emigrants and others had already sparsely sown the seeds of

the new faith, and making political power and prestige subservient to

zeal for truth and pity for suffering humanity, he induced his allies and

their vassals to purchase his friendship by seconding his endeavours to

inculcate the philosophic doctrines and engraft the humane practices of

Buddhism on their respective subjects. The results he obtained are

recorded in his famous inscriptions composed in various Indian dialects

and engraven upon rocks all over the continent, from Cabul in the West to

Orissa in the East; and among the monarchs whom he there enumerates as

having co-operated with him in his apostolic labours, are Antiochus,[153]

Turamaya,[154] Alexander, Magas[155] and Antigenes;[156] into whose

hospitable dominions he despatched zealous Buddhist missionaries,

empowered to found monasteries, to open dispensaries and hospitals, at

his expense, and to preach the saving word to all who cared to hear.

The following literal translation of one of Açoka's inscriptions[157]

will help to convey an idea of the nature of his activity as the royal

apostle of Buddhism, the Constantine of India: "All over the realms of

the god-favoured king, Priyadarsin, and (the realms of those) who (are)

his neighbours, such as the Codas, Pandyas, the Prince of the

Sâtiyas,[158] the Prince of the Keralas, Tamraparnî, the King of the

Javanas, Antiochus, and (among the) others who (are) vassals of the said

King Antiochus, everywhere the god-beloved, king, Priyadarsin, caused two

kinds of hospitals to be erected: hospitals for men and likewise

hospitals for animals.[159] Wherever there were no herbs beneficial to

men or animals, he everywhere gave orders that they should be procured or

planted. In like manner, where there were no health-giving roots and

fruits, he everywhere commanded that they should be procured or planted.

And on the highways he had trees put down and wells dug for the behoof of

men and beasts."[160]

History confirms Açoka's testimony and declares him to have been no less

successful in sowing the seeds of medicinal plants than those of the

"saving doctrine." Buddhism enrolled numerous converts and zealous

apostles all over the civilised world, and in Ceylon, Egypt, Bactria, and

Persia, the yellow flag floated aloft from the roofs of the monasteries

of _Bhikshus_.[161] But its influence, in other ways equally

powerful while considerably more subtle, has oftentimes escaped the

vigilance of the historian. None of the great religions of ancient or

modern times succeeded in escaping its contact, or failed to be improved

by its spirit. In the second century B.C. there were flourishing Buddhist

communities in inhospitable Bactria, where they maintained a firm footing

for nearly a thousand years. A Greek,[162] who wrote about the year 80

B.C., and a Chinese pilgrim,[163] who passed through the land in the

beginning of the seventh century A.D., allude to them as important

elements of the population of the country in their respective ages, and

the Buddhist monastery founded in Balkh, the capital of Bactria, in the

second century B.C., was become a famous pilgrimage in the days of Hiuen

Thsang. The Zoroastrian priests of Erân hated and feared the followers of

the strange creed while silently adopting and unconsciously propagating

many of its institutions. Several of the Eranian kings incurred the

censure involved in the nickname of "idolaters" in consequence of the

favour they extended to the preachers of Nirvana.[164] No religion of

antiquity was less favourable to a life of passive contemplation than

Zoroastrianism, which defined life as a continuous struggle, and

considered virtue as a successful battle with the powers of darkness; and

yet little by little Zoroastrian monasteries sprang up by the side of the

Fire Temples, and offered a quiet refuge from the turmoil of the world to

the pious worshippers of Ahura Mazda.[165]

So saturated were the Eranian populations with the spirit of

Buddha--antagonistic though it was to their own--that the two great

Eranian sects,[166] one of which bade fair to become a universal

religion,[167] were little else than adaptations of the creed of the

Buddha to the needs of a different time and people. Mânî, for instance,

prohibited marriage, which was one of the principal duties and holiest

acts of a true servant of Ahura Mazda; forbade the killing of animals

which, in the case of ants, serpents, gnats, &c., was enjoined by the

priests of Zoroaster, and discouraged agriculture lest plants should be

destroyed in the process. And the two classes of perfect and imperfect

disciples in Mânî's community were copied from those of Buddhism, which

divides all believers into two categories: those who sincerely and

fervently seek to attain to Nirvana and are termed Bhikshus, and the

Upasakas or laymen who, while holding on to life, practise such virtues

as are compatible with this unholy desire.

The Jewish religion, in certain of its phases, reveals in like manner

unmistakable traces of the influence of the religion of the Buddha. To

take but one instance, the Essenians in Judaea, near the Dead Sea and the

Therapeutes in Egypt, practised continence, eschewed all bloody

sacrifices, encouraged celibacy, and extreme abstemiousness in eating and

drinking. They formed themselves into communities, and lived, after the

manner of Buddhist Bhikshus, in monasteries. During the life of Jesus,

the Essenians, who lived mostly in cloistered retirement on the shores of

the Dead Sea, played no historic role; but after the destruction of

Jerusalem, they embraced Christianity in a body, and originated the

ascetic movement of the Ebionites, which did not finally subside until it

had deposited the germs of monasticism in the Church of Christ.

Koheleth, who lived either in Jerusalem or in Alexandria--more probably

in the latter city--about the year 205 B.C., had exceptional

opportunities for becoming acquainted with the tenets and precepts of the

religion of Buddha. He was evidently a man of an inquiring mind, with a

pronounced taste for philosophical speculation; and the social and

political conditions of his day were such that a person even of a very

incurious disposition would be likely to be brought face to face with the

sensational doctrine which was responsible for such amazing innovations

as hospitals for men and for animals. Alexandria, the museum and library

of which had already been founded, was one of the principal strongholds

of non-Indian Buddhists. It is mentioned in the Milindapanho, a Pali work

which deals with events that took place in the second century B.C.;[168]

it is expressly included by Açoka in the list of cities into which he

introduced a knowledge of the "path of duty," and so devoted were its

inhabitants to the creed of Sakhya Mouni,[169] that thirty years after

Augustine had died at Hippo, thirty thousand Bhikshus set out from

Alasadda[170] to annex new countries to the realm of truth.

Footnotes:

[140] _Cf._ the epilogue (xii. 9-14), for example, which is one of the

most timid and shuffling apologies ever penned.

[141] i. 9.

[142] i. 14.

[143] Malachi iii. 14.

[144] Professor Cheyne remarks: "To me, Koheleth is not a theist in any

vital sense in his philosophic meditations."--"Job and Solomon,"

p. 250.

[145] _Cf._ Proverbs xxx. 4.

[146] iii. 14, v. 2.

[147] Eccles. ix. 5.

[148] vii. 3, 4.

[149] The view of several of the most authoritative scholars--in which I

entirely concur--is that Koheleth was written in Alexandria during

the reign of Ptolemy V. (Epiphanes), who came to the throne as a boy

under the guardianship of tutors and was alluded to in the verse:

"Woe, land, to thee whose king is a child."

[150] Some of them were foreigners resident in India who, after their

conversion, preached the new doctrine to their fellow-countrymen.

Thus, one of the earliest and most successful missionaries was a

Greek, whose Indian name was Dharmarakshita.

[151] Plants, too, were included in their care and profited by their

protection.

[152] Açoka is a Sanskrit word, which means "free from care;" and

Piyadassi a dialectic form of the Sanskrit word Priyadarsin, which

means lovable, amiable. It was applied as an epithet to King Açoka,

who reigned from 259-222 B.C.

[153] Antiochus II., called Theos, who was poisoned by his divorced wife

Laodike in 247 B.C. I am aware that some scholars identify the

Antiochus here mentioned with Antiochus the Great. Although both

views make equally for my contention, I fail to see how Açoka,

who died in all probability in the year 222 B.C., could have

carried on important negotiations with Antiochus the Great, who

came to the throne of Syria two years later.

[154] Ptolemy of Egypt, probably Ptolemy Philadelphos, who founded the

Museum and Library of Alexandria, and his successor Ptolemy

Euergetes (247-221 B.C.).

[155] Magas, king of Cyrene.

[156] The identity of this monarch is uncertain.

[157] The second Edict of Girnar, Khalsi version.

[158] A South Indian people.

[159] Usually a dispensary was opened for the distribution of simples,

and a hospital hard by for those who could not move about. The

Buddhists were almost as anxious to relieve the physical pain and

illness of animals as of human beings.

[160] _Cf._ Bühler, "Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen

Gesellschaft," Band xxxvii. folg. p. 98.

[161] The monks or real disciples of Buddha who endeavour to attain

Nibbana or Nirvana. The bulk of the population contents itself with

almsgiving and the practice of elementary morality, the reward for

which will be a less unhappy existence after death; but not Nirvana,

to which only the perfect can hope to attain.

[162] Alexander Polyhistor, quoted by Cyrillus (_contra Julianum_);

_cf._ also Clemens Alexandrinus, _Stromata I._, p. 339.

[163] Hiuen Thsang.

[164] Their names and deeds are preserved in the Persian epic known as

the Book of Kings (Firdoosi, Shah-Nameh, _cf_. 1033, v. 4, 1160,

v. 2, &c.).

[165] Ormuzd. An instructive instance of the way in which foreign

institutions become nationalised in Bactria is afforded by the

Buddhist monastery in Balkh, which was at first known by its

Indian name, _nava vihâra_, a term that was gradually changed to

_naubehar,_ which in Persian means "new spring."

[166] Mânî and Mazdak.

[167] The religion of Mânî.

[168] Ed. Trenckner, p. 327.

[169] Buddha.

[170] Alexandria.

AGUR, THE AGNOSTIC

* * * * *

AGUR, SON OF YAKEH

Embedded in the collection of the Book of Proverbs[171] is an interesting

fragment of the philosophy of a certain "Agur, son of Yakeh, the poet,"

which for scathing criticism of the theology of his day and sweeping

scepticism as to every form of revealed religion, is unmatched by the

bitterest irony of Job and the most dogmatic agnosticism of Koheleth.

Unfortunately it is no more than a mere fragment, the verses of which are

thoughtfully separated from each other by strictures, protests, and

refutations of the baldest and most orthodox kind. Indeed, it is in all

probability precisely to the presence of the infallible antidote that we

owe the preservation of the deadly poison; and if we may found a

conjecture as to the character of the whole work on a comparison of the

fragments with what we know generally of the sceptical schools of

philosophy prevalent among the Jews of post-Exilian days, we shall feel

disposed to hold the seven strophes preserved in our Bibles as that

portion of the poem which the compiler considered to be the most innocent

because the least startling and revolutionary.

To the thinking of the critics of former times the Proverbs displayed

unmistakable traces of the unique and highly finished workmanship of the

great and wise king Solomon. At the present day no serious student of the

Bible, be he Christian or Rationalist, would raise his voice on behalf of

this Jewish tradition which, running counter to well-established facts,

is devoid even of the doubtful recommendation of moderate antiquity. A

more accurate knowledge of history and a more thorough study of philology

have long since made it manifest to all who can lay claim to either, that

however weighty may have been Solomon's titles to immortality, they

included neither depth of philosophic thought nor finish of literary

achievement. And an average supply of plain common-sense enables us to

see that even had that extraordinary monarch been a profound thinker or a

classic writer, he would hardly have treated future events as

accomplished facts without being endowed with further gifts and marked by

graver defects which would involve a curious combination of prophecy and

folly.

The Proverbs themselves, when properly interrogated, tell a good deal of

their own story; sacred and profane history supply the rest. In their

present form they were collected and edited by the author of the first

six verses of the first chapter, who drew his materials from different

sources. The first and most important of these was the so-called "Praise

of Wisdom" which, until a comparatively recent period, was erroneously

held to be a rounded, homogeneous poem. Professor Bickell conclusively

showed that it consists of ten different songs composed in the same metre

as the Poem of Job, each chapter being coextensive with one song, except

the first chapter, which contains two.[172] The fifth collection,

containing the proverbs copied "by the men of Hezekiah," is characterised

by the strong national spirit of the writers. Most of the others make

frequent mention of God, give a prominent place to religion, and adapt

themselves for use as texts for sermons; these, on the contrary, never

once mention His name, reflect religion as it was--viz., as only one of

the many sides of national existence, and deal mainly with the concrete

problems of the everyday life of the struggling people. The other sayings

may be aptly described as the pious maxims of a sect; these as the

thoughts of a nation. The seventh part of the Book of Proverbs contains

the remarkable sayings of Agur,[173] which were quite as frequently

misunderstood by the Jews of old as by Christians of more recent times,

the former heightening the impiety of the author and the latter

generously identifying him with the pious and fanatical writer to whose

well-meant refutations and protests we owe the preservation of this

interesting fragment of ancient Hebrew agnosticism.

Footnotes:

[171] The Book of Proverbs begins with ten songs on wisdom, which

constitute the first part of the work. The second part is made up

of distichs, each one of which, complete in itself, embodies a

proverbial saying (x. i-xxii. 16). The third section is composed of

the "sayings of the wise men," which are enshrined in tetrastichs or

strophes of four lines, among which we find an occasional

interpolation by the editor, recognisable by the paternal tone, the

words "My son," and the substitution of distichs for tetrastichs.

Then comes the appendix containing other proverbial dicta (chap.

xxiv. 23-34. chap. vi. 9-19, chap. xxv. 2-10), followed by the

proverbs "of Solomon, which the men of Hezekiah copied out"

(xxv. 11-xxvii. 22), and wound up with a little poem in praise of

rural economy. Chaps. xxviii. and xxix. constitute another collection

of proverbs of a more strictly religious character, and then come the

sayings of Agur, written in strophes of six lines, the rules for a

king and the praise of a good housewife.

[172] Prov. i. 7-19 and i. 20-33.

[173] Chap. xxx.

* * * * *

FORM AND CONTENTS OF THE SAYINGS OF AGUR

It is needless to discuss the condition and the contents of the entire

Book of Proverbs, seeing that each one of its component parts has an

independent, if somewhat obscure, history of its own. The final compiler

and editor, to whom we are indebted for the collection in its present

form, undoubtedly found the sweeping scepticism of the poet Agur and the

pious protestations of his anonymous adversary, the thesis and the

antithesis, inextricably interwoven in the section now known as the

thirtieth chapter. He himself apparently identified the two

antagonists--the scoffing doubter and the believing Jew; most modern

theologians have cheerfully followed his example. The fact would seem to

be that the orthodox member of the Jewish community, who thus

emphatically objected to aggressive agnosticism, was a man who strictly

observed the "Mosaic" Law, and sympathised with the people in their

hatred of their heathen masters and their hopes of speedy deliverance by

the Messiah; in a word, an individual of the party which later on played

an important role in Palestine under the name of the Pharisees.

Possessing a copy of Agur's popular philosophical treatise, this zealous

champion undertook to refute the theory before he had ascertained the

drift of the sayings in which it was enshrined, or grasped their primary

meaning. Thus, in one passage[174] he fancies that the taunts which Agur

levelled against omniscient theologians who are well up in the history of

everything that is done or left undone in heaven, while amazingly

ignorant of the ascertainable facts of earthly science, are really aimed

at God; and he seeks to parry the attack accordingly. His numerous and

amusing errors are such as characterise the fanaticism that would refute

a theory before hearing it unfolded, not those which accompany and betray

pious imbecility. Hence it would be unfair to tax him with the utter

incoherency of the prayer which our Bibles make him offer up, when

warding off the supposed attack upon God: (8) "Feed me with food

convenient for me, (9) Lest I be full and deny thee, and say, Who is the

Lord? or lest I be poor and steal, and take the name of my God _in

vain_." The mistake is the result of the erroneous punctuation of the

Hebrew words,[175] which may be literally rendered into English as

follows:

"Feed me with food suitable for me,

Lest I be sated and deny thee,

And say, Who is the Lord?

Or lest I be poor and yield to seduction,

And sin against the name of my God.'

In the ensuing verse the controversialist, full of his own Pharisaic[176]

views of politics, and fancying he detects in certain of Agur's

words,[177] an apology for the heathen rulers and contempt for the

orthodox people of God, inveighs against the traitor who would denounce

his fellow-subjects to their common master,[178] and holds him up to

universal odium.

One or two other false constructions put upon Agur's sayings by the

champion of the "Law of Jahveh," are likewise worthy of attention. In the

second sentence, which can be traced back to the proverbial philosophy of

the Hindoos, Agur, enumerating the four things that are never satisfied,

lays special stress upon two which are, so to say, the beginning and end

of all things, the alpha and omega of human philosophy--viz., the grave

and the womb;[179] the latter the bait as well as the portal of life, the

former the bugbear and the goal of all things living. The idea, no less

than the form, is manifestly Indian. Birth and death constitute the axis

of existence; the womb is the symbol of the allurement that tempts men to

forget their sorrows, to keep the Juggernaut wheel revolving and to

supply it with fresh victims to be mangled and crushed into the grave.

The lure and the deterrent--love of sensuous pleasure and fear of

dissolution--are as deceitful as all the other causes of pain and

pleasure in this world of appearance. Schopenhauer puts it tersely thus:

"As we are decoyed into life by the utterly illusory impulse to

voluptuousness, even so are we held fast therein by the fear of death,

which is certainly illusory in an equal degree. Both have their immediate

source in the Will, which in itself is unconscious."[180]

The only reward which life offers to those who crave it, is suffering and

death. The desire of life--the Indian _tanha_ or thirst of

existence--Agur represents in the form of the beautiful but terrible

Ghoul of the desert who has two daughters: birth and death. By means of

her fascinating charms she entices the wanderer to her arms, but instead

of satiating his soul with the promised joys, she ruthlessly flings him

to her two daughters who tear him to pieces and devour him on the spot.

Desire is the source of life which in turn is the taproot of all evil and

pain; insight into this truth--the knowledge or wisdom lauded by Job and

prized by Koheleth--affords the only means of breaking the unholy spell,

and escaping from the magic circle.

This ingenious and profound philosophical image was wholly misunderstood

by Agur's orthodox adversary, who founds upon the deprecatory allusion to

the womb a general accusation of lack of reverence for maternity and a

specific charge of disrespect for Agur's own mother.[181]

Agur's third saying has been likewise sadly misconstrued by the ancient

Pharisaic controversialist and by his faithful modern successors. He

enumerates therein four things which to him seem wholly incomprehensible,

the fourth and last being the darkest mystery of all: the flying of an

eagle in the air, the movement of a serpent--which is devoid of special

organs of locomotion--along a rock, the sailing of a ship on the ocean,

and "the way of a man with a maid."[182] It is very hard to believe what

is nevertheless an undeniable fact, that the bulk of serious commentators

classify these as the trackless things, whereby, strangely enough, they

understand the last of the four in a moral instead of a metaphysical

sense. The error is an old one: it was on the strength of this arbitrary

and vulgar interpretation that Agur was accused by his Jewish antagonist

of a criminal lack of filial piety towards his own father,[183] and

threatened with condign punishment, to be inflicted by the eagles that

fly so wonderfully in the air;[184] while another scribe, unaware that

the mystery of generation could be chosen as the text for a treatise on

metaphysics, and firmly convinced that the philosopher was condemning

unhallowed relations between the sexes, penned a gloss to make things

sufficiently clear which was afterwards removed from the margin to the

text where it now figures as the twentieth verse.

The Sceptics of the Old Testament: Job - Koheleth - Agur · 第 7 / 13 段