These intellectual exercises were not confined to the ‘Beef Steaks.’

There was in Tom Dibdin’s days a certain ‘Ad Libitum Club,’ where the

intellect was as much exercised as the more sensual appetites were

liberally gratified by supper and punch. At these jovial meetings, some

one happening to name an individual in course of conversation, would be

met by a cry of ‘Skull!’ which implied that the member was to consider

the individual dead, if he were not so already; at all events, he was

to furnish on the instant that individual’s rhymed epitaph. Tom Dibdin

once chanced to refer to Isaac Read, the scholar and antiquary. The cry

of ‘Skull’ was immediately raised, and Tom as instantaneously replied

to it as follows:--

Reader! by these four lines take heed,

And mend your life, for _my_ sake!

For you must die, like Isaac Read,

Though you _read_ till your _eyes ache_.

On another occasion Tom, without thinking of the consequences, made

some allusion to the materials for writing his own life. He was, in

one breath, pronounced to be dead, and with the cry of ‘Skull!’ he was

challenged to recite his own epitaph. It was furnished in the lively

style that follows:--

Longing, while living, for laurel and bays,

Under this willow a poor poet _lays_.

With little to censure and less to praise,

He wrote twelve dozen and threescore plays,

He finished his ‘Life’ and went his ways.

While on the subject of epitaphs we may as well give a sample of Tom’s

father in this department of literature. The following, penned in all

seriousness, is to be found in Lee churchyard, near Blackheath, the

tribute of Charley to Parsons, the comic actor:--

Here Parsons lies! Oft on life’s busy stage,

With nature, reader, hast thou seen him vie.

He science knew; knew manners, knew the age,

Respected knew to live--lamented, die.

Thomas Frognall Dibdin, son of ‘Tom Bowling,’ seems to have been early

influenced by a desire to show that the Dibdin power of rhyming was in

him as well as in his cousins. In 1797 Booker published his ‘Poems.’

Two years after this mild flirtation of the reverend cousin with the

Muses, Tom Dibdin made an adaptation from ‘Kotzebue,’ and brought it

out with songs, as ‘Of Age To-morrow.’ Our then young grandmothers were

soon singing Miss de Camp’s song, ‘Oh no, my Love, no!’ and juvenile

actors were all longing to come out in Bannister’s part of Frederick,

Baron Willmhurst. Miss de Camp had come from the sawdust of the Surrey

Circus, to charm the town; and when she was Mrs. Charles Kemble she

became the mother of Fanny Kemble.

They are all gone, these Dibdins, of whom Charles of Southampton was

the one whose fame will be the most lasting. Like all men, he is to

be judged by his best. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link;

a boiler is only as thick as its thinnest part; but a poet is to be

measured by his best--the best teachings of the best of his poetry. By

this standard the oldest of the Dibdins will rank foremost among those

bards and minstrels who have swept the harp and raised the voice to

quicken human trust in God, to fan into flame the slumbering but never

dead fire of patriotism, and to inculcate loyalty to the powers that

be. Dibdin taught perseverance in well-doing with the fervour of a St.

Paul, and if he allowed a little too much of the bowl, he was earnest

in upholding, when serious, courage and honesty in man, and undying

fidelity to woman.

When the youngest of the vocal, musical, and dramatic Dibdins died,

in 1841, some one was found to fling, as it were, a stanza or two of

sympathy on his tomb. From some lines, called ‘Poor Tom,’ dated from

Vienna and printed in the ‘Bath Journal,’ we take the last eight to

close our article:--

Poor Tom! As late I wander’d by the Rhine,

I saw its banks in Winter’s mantle clad,

Gaunt, grim, and naked stood each shiv’ring vine--

It was a sight to make the soul feel sad.

‘How many a heart,’ I said, ‘is now made warm

By the bright produce of the joyous tree,

Here left by man to struggle with the storm!’

I sigh’d, Tom; went my way; and thought of thee!

_HORATIO NELSON AND EMMA HAMILTON._

On Michaelmas-day in the year 1758, the wife of the rector of Burnham

Thorpe was delivered of a sickly boy. At that moment Anson was in

command of the Channel fleet, and there were old men then in England

who had seen Prince Rupert. Exactly a quarter of a century had elapsed

since Admiral Byng had surrendered life. Russell, who beat Tourville

at La Hogue, had been asleep in the grave for more than thirty years.

Churchill, and Dilkes, the terror of Frenchmen and Spaniards in his

day, had been at rest for just half a century. These were great men;

but in 1758 a greater than all was born in the quiet rectory of

Burnham Thorpe. That feeble boy, accepted and tolerated rather than

welcomed and cherished, grew up in the possession of all the virtues

of the above heroes and with but few of their failings: he had the

dashing spirit of Rupert without his imprudence: he possessed the

wisdom and valour of Byng without his cold-heartedness: he was as

persevering as Anson and in no wise so foolish--as rapid as Russell,

but not so rapacious: he was even more enterprising and successful

than Dilkes; and, as with the gallant brother of Marlborough, his

services claimed high honours long before he obtained them. This puny

fragile child, born to achieve such greatness--this almost neglected

son of a Norfolk parson, and, by his mother, grandson of a Westminster

prebendary--designed, as it were, by nature to be a student, ‘sicklied

o’er with the pale cast of thought,’ and to cultivate learned leisure

in trim gardens--this feeble instrument was born with a great mission:

let the splendour of its fulfilment make us forgetful of his very few

errors!

Yes: when he first saw the light there were old men in England who had

seen Prince Rupert beneath the beeches at Windsor. It was but the other

day that Nelson’s sister died. Thus is he connected with two periods

when the people were at issue with sovereigns: his figure stands

half-way between the time, when Roundheads were assailing cavaliers and

royalty; and the present period, when democracy, more despotic than

any aristocracy, is again howling at palace gates and the hearths of

nobles. In his own days the same struggle was going on; but the scene

of the struggle was not now within our boundary of home. He was the

great champion of royalty, and never had crowned king so unconquerable

a champion as he. There was not a democrat abroad who did not hate

his name as much as he feared it. For the French democrats his own

hatred was in equal measure intense; and, if it be suggested that his

contempt was not less intense for French aristocrats, we answer that

he lived at a period when the vices, the selfishness, and the tyranny

of that aristocracy justified the insurrection, which annihilated one

bad system to give temporary life to a worse. He did not despise the

dissolute men and the more dissolute women of Naples less than he

despised the French; but, in supporting the one and destroying the

other, he was the great antagonist of anarchy, and the great promoter

of order at home. Loyalty _here_ flourished by the blood of his

victories. The veriest would-be rebel in England was proud of the pale

warrior whose feeble arm upheld a world of thrones; a defeat at Aboukir

might have made him a Republican. But we are hurried from Nelson’s

cradle to his glories and his grave. Let us sketch his wondrous career

in a more orderly spirit.

She who bore the perils of his birth did not survive to be glad at

his greatness. At nine, Nelson was motherless--at twelve he quitted

school--and some of his playfellows were yet launching their paper

galleons on Norfolk ponds when Nelson had gained respect and reputation

for his name. A trip of a few brief months’ duration with his maternal

uncle, Captain Suckling, just introduced him to naval life without

affording him instruction. The latter he derived under Captain John

Rathborn, a naval officer, engaged for the time in the West India

trade, under whom Nelson acquired a thorough acquaintance with

practical seamanship, and was ever ready to acknowledge his obligation.

The writer of this acknowledges his pride, too, in telling his son

that his mother is the granddaughter of Nelson’s tutor. Horatio began

his real service in the royal navy by entering the _Triumph_, rated

as ‘captain’s servant.’ In a year or so he became midshipman, the

duties of which office he efficiently performed during four or five

years on board the same vessel, and in the _Carcass_, the _Seahorse_,

and the _Dolphin_. During this period, he saw active service in every

climate, from the North Pole to Bagdad and Bussorah. We next find him

as lieutenant on board the _Worcester_ and the _Lowestoft_. While on

board the last-mentioned vessel he made his first prize, gallantly

boarding and capturing an American privateer, from an attempt at

which the first lieutenant had retired unsuccessful; and this was

accomplished when he was only nineteen years of age! So fond was he

of this branch of his profession that he changed to the schooner

_Lucy_, with a sort of roving commission, of which the American traders

soon became tremblingly conscious. He subsequently served in the

_Bristol_ (the flag-ship of Sir Peter Parker), in the three degrees of

lieutenancy; and, in 1778, ere he was yet twenty, the boy was captain

of the _Badger_ brig, and with men eager to obey him. But his just

ambition was not yet satisfied; and when in his twenty-first year

he had the delight of finding himself posted, and in command of the

_Hinchinbrook_, his whole course of daring and dangerous service in

the Gulf of Mexico plainly manifested that he was ever keeping in view

that ‘top of the tree,’ whose leafy honours first invited him from his

father’s rectory. The service alluded to seriously affected his own

health and cost the lives of one hundred and ninety out of his crew

of two hundred men. On his return home he rested at Bath for a year.

He had no long leisure to be ill, for the following year saw him in

the old French _Albemarle_, carrying terror along the Spanish main.

In 1782, he was employed in convoy service; and, having occasionally

some idle time on shore at Quebec, the young commander got into

mischief--that is, he fell most imprudently into love. His friends

carried him by violence on board: the sea air cured his passion; and

his lucky joining with Hood’s fleet and his subsequent busy time in the

West Indies effectually kept his thoughts from any lady then on land.

It was at this period that he became known to the Duke of Clarence. The

royal sailor thought him the merest boy of a captain that had ever been

seen, and could not but laugh at the gigantic and endless queue that

hung down his back and seemed to be pulling all the lank unpowdered

hair off his head after it. But this plain-looking and youthful

commander was then remarkable for being as well acquainted with all

naval matters as the oldest and most experienced captain in the fleet.

The piping time of peace put him for a season on half-pay. A portion of

1783, and of the year following it, was passed in France. With idleness

came evil; and, having nothing better to do, Nelson fell desperately in

love with the dowerless daughter of an English clergyman, who, there is

some reason to believe, was little affected by the magic he could offer

her of half-pay and love in a cottage. The sea again stood his friend.

In 1784, the _Boreas_ carried him to the Leeward Islands, where, at

great risk of purse and person, he was actively engaged in supporting

those Navigation Laws which our modern Whigs have so ruthlessly

abolished.

In this matter (says Dr. Pettigrew) he was also opposed by

Major-General Sir T. Shirly, the governor of the Leeward Islands,

who took in dudgeon the advice of Nelson, and assured him that

old generals were not in the habit of taking advice from young

gentlemen. Upon which Nelson, with much promptitude and ingenuity,

replied--‘Sir, I am as old as the Prime Minister of England, and

think myself as capable of commanding one of his Majesty’s ships

as that Minister is of governing the State.’

He was engaged in putting down the illicit traffic sought to be carried

on by the Americans (whom successful rebellion had made foreigners) in

the West Indies, and also in dragging into light the frauds practised

by some English officials of no inconsiderable dignity in the islands.

He succeeded in all he undertook, but got small thanks and no profit

for any service which, in this respect, he rendered to his country.

He was much on shore, too; and it is a fact that his foot no sooner

touched the land than his good genius left him. He fell in love with a

widow; and, what is much worse, married her. In the island of Nevis he

became acquainted with Mrs. Nisbet, the widow of a surgeon who had died

insane a year and a half after their marriage, leaving her with one

son, Josiah, who subsequently owed so much to Nelson and thanked him so

little for it. At this time the captain of the _Boreas_ was a man at

whom Fame held her finger; he never drank wine save to the healths of

his sovereign, the royal family, and his admiral, and these were always

bumper toasts to him. He was reserved, grave, and silent; and it was

only occasional flashes that gave evidence of the brilliancy within.

The narrow-minded people of Nevis could not make him out; and Mrs.

Nisbet was set at him, as she was expected to make something of him,

because ‘she had been in the habit of attending to such odd sort of

people.’ Unfortunately she made a husband of him. She, perhaps, thought

it a condescension to marry a man who was of ‘puny constitution--who

was reduced to a skeleton--and who put his hopes of recovery in

asses’ milk and doctors.’ However this may be, she never looked upon

him as a hero, nor was she worthy of being a hero’s wife. She would

have been exemplary as the spouse of a village apothecary: she was

highly virtuous, very respectable, and exceedingly ill-tempered. The

ill-assorted pair were united in 1786: they reached England in 1787, in

which year Nelson was kept for months on board his ship at Sheerness,

merely taking in slops and lodging pressed seamen. And then ensued the

quietest six years of his life: they were passed at Burnham Thorpe, and

they were got through with tolerably good success. As a quiet country

couple, there was nothing to disturb their stagnant felicity. Nelson

busied himself in gardening, getting birds’ nests, and fretting for

employment.

It came in 1793; when in place of capturing birds’ nests, Nelson, in

the _Agamemnon_, was with the fleet at the capture of Toulon, its

forts, and its navy. But other things came in 1793, too. Nelson was

sent to Naples with despatches for our Minister, Sir William Hamilton.

He was much on shore, and mischief came of it, of course. Sir William

told his wife, the too famous, too erring, and yet much sinned-against

Lady Hamilton, that a little man was coming to dine with him who was

infirm and ill-looking, but who had in him the stuff of a hero, and

who was undoubtedly destined to be _the_ man for the difficulties

coming. If Emma Hamilton loved a virtue it was that of courage and

ability in man: she loved heroes, and her ardent feelings were soon

interested in Nelson.

From this period we must speak more generally of Nelson’s great deeds

that we may have fuller space to treat of matters less known, and in

the revealing of which lie the chief merit and the chief recommendation

of Dr. Pettigrew’s excellent volumes. Lord Howe appointed him (over

five senior captains) to blockade Genoa. In 1794 he was active against

the French in Corsica, and his men so entered into his own spirit that,

as he said himself, they minded shot no more than peas. But for him,

Bastia would not have been taken, nor perhaps Calvi, where he received

the injury to his right eye which ultimately deprived it of sight.

His labour was incessant and his health most wretched; but he was too

busy to be invalided. ‘The plan I pursue (said he) is never to employ

a doctor;’ and, consequently, though he was ill, he kept himself from

the peril of growing worse. In 1795 he had his first ‘_brush_’ with the

French _fleet_. He thus modestly calls a battle, in which he laid the

_Agamemnon_ between the _Ça Ira_ and the _Censeur_ and forced both to

yield. The former was large enough to put the _Agamemnon_ in her hold.

He was now fully in that vein of conquest which never left him when a

French vessel was before him as an antagonist. He now dared to disobey

orders when he judged that circumstances authorised him, and he was no

bad judge. He had by this time been engaged one hundred times--he was

literally the hero of a hundred fights. His ship when docked, in order

to be refitted, had neither mast, yard, sail, or rigging, that did not

need repair in consequence of the shot she had received: her hull had

long been secured by cables sewed around her. Nelson exhibited such

discretion in disobeying orders, and success so invariably followed

action that resulted from judgment of his own, that at length his

admirals ceased to give him any close orders at all. Sir John Jervis

left him to act as he thought best: the result was that, in two years,

Nelson captured fifty French vessels; and the navy itself, under

Jervis and his pale captain, became perfectly invincible. Up to 1797

victory followed victory: there was abundance of honour and salt-beef;

but neither prize-money nor even notice in the ‘Gazette.’ He consoled

himself by saying that he would one day have a ‘Gazette’ of his own and

all to himself. He had well-nigh deserved it for the crowning fight

at St. Vincent: he was in the thickest of the struggle where the odds

against us were twenty-seven to fifteen. It made Jervis an earl and

Nelson a knight, and it opened a new era in naval strategy; for never

from that day has British captain bent upon victory paused to count his

enemy, or deferred his triumph in calculating the disparity of power

except Lord Gambier at Aix.

Honours were both lavished on, and conferred by, the frail conqueror

of the _San Josef_ and the _San Nicolas_. Corporations flung their

municipal freedoms at his feet, and gave him endless invitations to

dinner. The only thing that he ever designated as _dreadful_ was

meeting a provincial mayor and alderman! They voted him more swords

than he could ever hope to employ; but they were all outweighed by

that which he himself presented to the Corporation of Norwich--the

sword which had been surrendered to him by his gallant but vanquished

foe on board the _San Josef_. Norwich will be proud of her trophy

when no memory remains of her crapes and bombazeens or of the fair

forms that wore them. The Government, too, made him rear-admiral of

the blue. He was not an idle one: he went to sea in the _Theseus_

surrounded by men whose hearts, though turbulent, beat in unison

with the pulsations of his own: he twice bombarded Cadiz--lost his

right arm before Teneriffe--reposed awhile at Bath to recruit his

strength--received some pecuniary reward for the loss of it; and, after

publicly thanking the Almighty for all His mercies and acknowledging

the lightness of His visitations, was again entrusted to save his

country by destroying the then enemies of all mankind. With a squadron

of observation he scoured the Mediterranean, and after a search

unparalleled in its nature, and carrying despair to every heart but

his own, he came upon the French at Aboukir and made 1798 for ever

memorable in England by the well-won victory which he achieved at

the Nile. If honours poured on him after the affair at St. Vincent,

they descended now in an avalanche. His king made _him_ a peer who

among men was peerless. Parliament thanked him: the nation adored

him. Russia endowed him with coloured ribbands--the Sultana stuffed

his mouth with sugar-candy--public companies enrolled him among their

members. ‘Nelson-squares,’ and ‘streets,’ and ‘terraces,’ arose without

number; and curates were weary of christening an endless succession of

Horatios. As for Naples, which country he had saved from the very jaws

of the French, the people there when he landed nearly killed him with

kindness, and did all but devour him. The king, queen, and the entire

court, kissed his very feet. He turned with something like disgust from

all their homage, and his honest tongue confessed that he despised

those whom it was his duty to save, and that he loathed in his very

soul the entire court, if not the universal people. He designated the

men as scoundrels: the women were what the author of the old ballad of

‘Nancy Dawson’ says that well-known lady was, and they cared as little

to keep it from their neighbours; and he brushed away the imprecation

on his lips, launched against the Neapolitan ladies, to kiss the hand

of Emma Hamilton! But there _was_ a distinction, though we are not

going to show where it lay.

From the same year to that which closed the century, 1800, his presence

was all but ubiquitous in the Mediterranean, and his name was uttered

with awe and reverence all over the world. Within this period he

became rear-admiral of the red, and Naples made him Duke of Bronté,

in return for his having saved the nation from entire destruction.

Within the same period is on record that dark event connected with the

name of Carracciolo, to which we will hereafter allude: let it suffice

to say here that after sweeping the Mediterranean of the enemies of

England, and doing a world of good to those who were not worthy of

being reckoned her friends--after executing all entrusted to him to

accomplish, and rendering the name of England a tower of strength and

pride throughout the world--Nelson returned home across Europe. He did

not set out without first writing a sensible letter to the Pope, whom

he had restored to Rome, in better fashion than Oudinot lately followed

in behalf of Pio Nono. According to the prophecy of honest old Father

M’Cormick, Nelson may be said to have taken Rome with his ships--a feat

of which he reminds the Pope and remains his ‘very obedient servant.’

That his progress from Leghorn to Hamburgh was one of such triumph

as the world had never seen may be readily believed; for no human

being had ever deserved such ovation. When he landed at Yarmouth the

earth seemed to heave to salute him. Myriads of men blessed him, wept

over him, hailed him with shouts--in the warmth of their welcome they

did all but pay him divine honours. And his wife--how did she spring

forward in exultation and enduring love, impatient to meet the boat

that bore her heroic husband? Alas! Lady Nelson was quietly awaiting

his arrival at Nerot’s hotel in town, and so cold and unsatisfactory

was her greeting when the idol of the nation stepped into her presence

that the incense of London adulation must have proved savoury by

comparison.

In and About Drury Lane, and Other Papers, Vol. 2 (of 2) Reprinted from the pages of the 'Temple Bar' Magazine · 第 12 / 19 段