to persuade the sovereign, as Moret had vainly sought to do, to
dissolve the Cortes, to the end that the Liberal ministry might appeal
to the country. The elections were held May 10. They were of peculiar
interest by reason of the fact that now for the first time there was
put into operation an electoral measure of the recent Maura government
whereby it is required that every candidate for a seat in the lower
chamber shall be placed in nomination by two ex-senators, two
ex-deputies, or three members of the general council of the province.
This regulation had been opposed by the Republicans and by the radical
elements generally on the ground that it put in the hands of the
Government power virtually to dictate candidacies in many electoral
districts, and the results seemed fairly to sustain the charge. May 1,
in accordance with a provision of the law, 120 deputies--upwards of
one-third of the total number to be chosen--were declared elected, by
reason of having no competitors. Of these 70 were Liberals, 39 were
Conservatives, and the remainder belonged to minor groups. In the
districts in which there were contests the Government also won
decisively a few days later, as it did likewise in the senatorial
elections of May 15. The results of the elections, as officially
reported, may be tabulated as follows:
(p. 625)
CONGRESS
OF
DEPUTIES
| Elected indirectly
| by the people, May 15
| |
| | Elected by
| | the corporations,
| | etc., May 15
| | |
| | | SENATE
| | | Total elected
| | | |
| | | | Immovable portion
| | | | of Senate
| | | | |
| | | | | Grand
| | | | | Total
| | | | | |
Liberals 229 92 11 103 70 173
Dissenting Liberals 0 3 0 3 0 3
Conservatives 107 35 7 42 77 119
Republicans 40 3 1 4 0 4
Carlists 9 4 0 4 2 6
Regionalists 8 4 1 5 0 5
Integrists 7 0 0 0 0 0
Independents 5 1 1 2 16 18
Socialists 1 0 0 0 0 0
Catholics 0 5 0 5 8 13
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
406 147 21 168 173[863] 341
[Footnote 863: Some seats vacant.]
*691. Republicanism and Socialism.*--Among other accounts, the elections
of 1910 were notable by reason of the return to the Congress for the
first time of a socialist member. In Madrid, as in other centers of
population, the Government concluded with the Conservatives an
_entente_ calculated to hold in check the rising tide of socialism and
republicanism. Under the stimulus thus afforded the Socialists at last
responded to the overtures which the Republicans had long been making,
and the coalition which resulted was successful in returning to
Parliament the Socialist leader Iglesias, together with an otherwise
all but unbroken contingent of Republicans. In Barcelona and elsewhere
Republican gains were decisive. None the less the Republican forces
continue to be so embarrassed by factional strife as to be not really
formidable. The Socialists, however, exhibit a larger degree of unity.
As in Italy, France, and most European countries, they are growing
both in numbers and in effectiveness of organization. In Spain, as in
Italy, the historic parties which have been accustomed to share
between them the control of the state have, in reality, long since
lost much of the vitality which they once possessed. The terms
"Liberal" and "Conservative" denote even less than once they did
bodies of men standing for recognized political principles, or even
for recognized political policies. The field for the development of
parties which shall take more cognizance of the nation's actual
conditions and be more responsive to its demands seems wide and, on
the whole, not unpromising.[864]
[Footnote 864: On political parties in Spain two
older works are A. Borrego, Organizaciôn de los
Partidos (Madrid, 1855) and El Partido Conservador
(Madrid, 1857). Two valuable books are E. Rodriguez
Solis, Historia del partido republicano español
(Madrid, 1893) and B. M. Andrade y Uribe, Maura und
di Konservativen Partei in Spanien (Karlsruhe,
1912). The subject is sketched excellently to 1898
in Clarke, Modern Spain, Chaps. 14-16. In the
domain of periodical literature may be mentioned A.
Marvaud, Les élections espagnoles de mai 1907, in
_Annales des Sciences Politiques_, July, 1907; C.
David, Les élections espagnoles, in _Questions
Diplomatiques et Coloniales_, May 16, 1907; A.
Marvaud, Un aspect nouveau du Catalanisme, ibid.,
June 16, 1907; La situation politique et financière
de l'Espagne, ibid., Dec. 16, 1908; La rentrée des
Cortes et la situation en Espagne, ibid., June 16,
1910. A well-informed sketch is L. G. Guijarro,
Spain since 1898, in _Yale Review_, May, 1909.]
VII. THE JUDICIARY AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (p. 626)
*692. Law and Justice.*--The law of Spain is founded upon the Roman law,
the Gothic common law, and, more immediately, the Leyes de Toro, a
national code promulgated by the Cortes of Toro in 1501. By the
constitution it is stipulated that the same codes shall be in
operation throughout all portions of the realm and that in these codes
shall be maintained but one system of law, to be applied in all
ordinary civil and criminal cases in which Spanish subjects shall be
involved. The civil code which is at present in operation was put in
effect throughout the entire kingdom May 1, 1889. The penal code dates
from 1870, but was amended in 1877. The code of civil procedure was
put in operation April 1, 1881, and that of criminal procedure, June
22, 1882. A new commercial code took effect August 22, 1885.
"The power of applying the laws in civil and criminal cases," says the
constitution, "shall belong exclusively to the courts, which shall
exercise no other functions than those of judging and of enforcing
their judgments."[865] What courts shall be established, the
organization of each, its powers, the manner of exercising them, and
the qualifications which its members must possess, are left to be
determined by law. The civil hierarchy to-day comprises tribunals of
four grades: the municipal courts, the courts of first instance, the
courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court at Madrid. The justices of the
peace of the municipal courts are charged with the registration of
births and deaths, the preparation of voting lists, the performance of
civil marriage, and the hearing of petty cases to the end that
conciliation, if possible, may be effected between the litigants. No
civil case may be brought in any higher court until effort shall have
been made to adjust it in a justice's tribunal. In each of the 495
_partidos judiciales_, or judicial districts, of the kingdom is a
court of first instance, empowered to take cognizance of all causes,
both civil and criminal. From these tribunals lies appeal in civil
cases to fifteen _audiencias territoriales_. By a law of April 20,
1888--the measure by which was introduced the use of the jury in (p. 627)
the majority of criminal causes--there were established forty-seven
_audiencias criminales_, one in each province of the kingdom, and
these have become virtually courts of assize, their sessions being
held four times a year. Finally, at Madrid is established a Supreme
Court, modelled on the French Court of Cassation, whose function it is
to decide questions relating to the competence of the inferior
tribunals and to rule on points of law when appeals are carried from
these tribunals. Cases involving matters of administrative law,
decided formerly by the provincial councils and the Council of State,
are disposed of now in the _audiencias_ and in the fourth chamber of
the Supreme Court.[866]
[Footnote 865: Art. 76. Dodd, Modern Constitutions,
II., 213.]
[Footnote 866: G. Marin, La jurisdiction
contentieuse administrative en Espagne, in _Revue
du Droit Public_, Oct.-Dec., 1906.]
Justice is administered in the name of the king. All judgments must be
pronounced in open court, and by the constitution it is guaranteed
specifically that proceedings in criminal matters shall be public. In
every tribunal the state is represented by _abogados fiscales_ (public
prosecutors) and counsel nominated by the crown. Magistrates and
judges, appointed by the crown, may not be removed, suspended, or
transferred, save under circumstances minutely stipulated in the
organic judicial laws. But judges are responsible personally for any
violation of law of which they may be guilty.
*693. Local Government: the Province and the Commune.*--Prior to 1833
the Spanish mainland comprised thirteen provinces, by which were
preserved in a large measure both the nomenclature and the
geographical identity of the ancient kingdoms and principalities from
which the nation was constructed. In the year mentioned the number of
provinces was increased to forty-seven, at which figure it remains at
the present day. The essential agencies of government in the province
are two--the governor and the _diputacion provincial_, or provincial
council. The governor is appointed by the crown and it is his
function, under the direction of the Minister of the Interior, to
represent the central government in the provincial council and in the
general administrative business of the province. The provincial
council is composed of members chosen by the voters of the province,
which means, under the law of June 28, 1890, all male Spaniards of the
age of twenty-five. Under the presidency of the governor the body
meets yearly, and in the intervals between sessions it is represented
by a _commission provinciale_, or provincial committee, elected
annually. The size of the council varies roughly according to the
population of the province.
The smallest governmental unit is the commune, and the number of (p. 628)
communes in the kingdom is approximately 8,000. In each is an
_ayuntamiento_, or council, the members of which, varying in number
from five to thirty-nine, are elected for four years (one-half
retiring biennially) by those residents of the commune who are
qualified to vote for members of the provincial councils. To serve as
the chief executive officer of the municipality the _ayuntamiento_
regularly elects from its own number an _alcalde_, or mayor, although
in the larger towns appointment of the mayor is reserved to the crown.
*694. Principles of Local Control.*--After stipulating that the
organization and powers of the provincial and municipal councils shall
be regulated by law, the constitution lays down certain fundamental
principles to be observed in the enactment of such legislation. These
are (1) the management of the local interests of the province and the
commune shall be left entirely to the respective councils; (2) the
estimates, accounts, and official acts of these bodies shall
invariably be made public; (3) the fiscal powers of the councils shall
be so determined that the financial system of the nation may never be
brought in jeopardy; and (4) in order to prevent the councils from
exceeding their prerogatives to the prejudice of general and
established interests the power of intervention shall be reserved to
the sovereign and, under certain circumstances, to the Cortes.[867]
The theory, carried over from the liberal constitution of 1869, is
that within the spheres marked out for them by law the provinces and
the municipalities are autonomous. And it undoubtedly is true that,
compared with the system in operation prior to 1868, the present
régime represents distinct decentralization. None the less it must be
said that in practice there is ever a tendency on the part of the
central authorities to encroach upon the privileges of the local
governing agencies, and through several years there has been under
consideration a reorganization of the entire administrative system in
the direction of less rather than more liberalism. In 1909 a Local
Administration bill devised by the recent Maura ministry was adopted
by the lower chamber of the Cortes. This measure, which was combatted
with vigor by the Liberal party, proposed to enlarge the fiscal
autonomy of the communes, but at the same time to modify the
provincial and municipal electoral system by the establishment of an
educational qualification, by the admission of corporations to
electoral privileges, and by otherwise lessening the weight of the
vote of the individual citizen. In the Senate the measure met
determined opposition, and as yet its fate is uncertain.[868]
[Footnote 867: Art. 84. Dodd, Modern Constitutions,
II., 215.]
[Footnote 868: J. Gascon y Marin, La réforme du
régime local en Espagne, in _Revue du Droit
Public_, April-June, 1909.]
CHAPTER XXXIV (p. 629)
THE GOVERNMENT OF PORTUGAL
I. A CENTURY OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
*695. The Napoleonic Subjugation and the Constitution of 1820.*--The
government of Portugal at the opening of the nineteenth century was no
less absolute than was that of Spain, The Cortes was extinct, and
although Pombal, chief minister during the period 1750-1777, had
caused all Portuguese subjects to be made eligible to public office
and had introduced numerous economic and administrative reforms,
nothing had been permitted to be done by which the unrestricted
authority of the crown might be impaired. The country was affected but
slightly by the Revolution in France. In 1807, however, it fell prey
to Napoleon and the royal family was obliged to take refuge in the
dependency of Brazil. With the aid of the English the power of the
conqueror was broken in 1808, and through a number of years the
government was administered nominally by a commission designated by
the absentee regent, Dom John, though actually by a British
dictatorship. In 1815 Brazil was raised to the rank of a co-ordinate
kingdom, and from that year until 1822 the official designation of the
state was "the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil, and the Algarves."
In 1816 the mad queen Maria I. died and the regent succeeded to the
affiliated thrones as John VI. His original intention was to remain in
America, but in 1820 a general revolt in Portugal culminated in the
calling of a national assembly by which there was framed a
constitution reproducing the essentials of the Spanish instrument of
1812, and by this turn of events the sovereign was impelled, in 1821,
to set sail for the mother country, leaving as regent in Brazil his
son Dom Pedro. Fidelity to the new constitution was pledged perforce,
but the elements of reaction gathered strength swiftly, and before the
close of 1823 the instrument was abrogated. The only tangible result
of the episode was the creation of a constitutional party which
thereafter was able much of the time to keep absolutism upon the
defensive.[869]
[Footnote 869: In the meantime a revolt which was
impending in Brazil at the time of King John's
withdrawal had run its course. September 7, 1822,
the regent Dom Pedro, who freely cast in his lot
with the revolutionists, proclaimed the country's
independence, and some weeks later he was declared
constitutional emperor. Protest from Lisbon was
emphatic, but means of coercing the rebellious
colony were not at hand, and, in 1825, under
constraint of the powers, King John was compelled
to recognize the independence of his transoceanic
dominion.]
*696. The Constitutional Charter of 1826: Miguelist Wars.*--The (p. 630)
death of John VI., March 10, 1826, precipitated a conflict of large
importance in the history of Portuguese constitutionalism. The heir to
the throne was Dom Pedro, Emperor of Brazil, who as sovereign of
Portugal, assumed the title Pedro IV. Having inaugurated his reign by
the grant of a constitutional charter whereby there was introduced a
parliamentary system of government on the pattern of that in operation
in Great Britain, the new king, being unwilling to withdraw from
America, made over the Portuguese throne to his seven-year-old
daughter, Dona Maria da Gloria, with the stipulation that when she
should come of age she should be married to her uncle, Dom Miguel, in
whom meanwhile the regency was to be vested. Amid enthusiasm the
_Carta Constitucional_ was proclaimed at Lisbon, July 31, 1826, and in
August there was established a responsible Liberal ministry under
Saldanha. When, however, in 1828, the regent at length arrived in
Portugal, a clerical and absolutist counter-revolution was found to be
under way, and by the reactionary elements he was received, not as
regent, but as king. By a Cortes of the ancient type, summoned in the
stead of the parliament provided for in the Charter, Dom Miguel was
tendered the crown, which, in violation of all the pledges he had
given, he made haste to accept. That he might vindicate the claims of
his daughter, the Emperor Pedro, in April, 1831, abdicated his
Brazilian throne and, repairing to Portugal, devoted himself
unsparingly to the task of deposing the usurper. The outcome of the
wars which ensued was that in 1834 Dom Miguel was overthrown and
banished perpetually from the kingdom. Until his death, in September
of the same year, Pedro acted as regent for his daughter, and under
his comparatively enlightened rule the Charter of 1826 was restored
and the state was set once more upon the path of reform. Upon his
death the Princess Maria assumed the throne as Maria II.[870]
[Footnote 870: Cambridge Modern History, X., Chap.
10; Lavisse et Rambaud, Histoire Générale, X.,
Chap. 6; H. M. Stephens, Portugal (New York, 1903),
Chap. 18. A general treatise covering the period is
W. Bollaert, The Wars of Succession of Portugal and
Spain from 1821 to 1840 (London, 1870).]
*697. Nominal Constitutionalism, 1834-1853.*--The reign of Queen Maria
(1834-1853) was a period of factional turbulence. There were now three
political groups of principal importance: the Miguelists, representing
the interests of the repudiated absolutist régime; the Chartists, who
advocated the principles of the moderate constitution (that of 1826)
at the time in operation; and the Septembrists,[871] who were (p. 631)
attached rather to the principles of the radical instrument of
1821-1822. By all, save perhaps the Miguelists, the maintenance of a
constitution of some type was regarded as no longer an open question.
In 1836 the Septembrists stimulated a popular rising in consequence of
which the constitution of 1822 was declared again in effect until a
new one should have been devised, and, April 4, 1838, there was
brought forward under Septembrist auspices an instrument in which it
was provided that an elected senate should take the place of the
aristocratic House of Peers for which the Charter provided, and that
elections to the House of Deputies should thenceforth be direct. In
1839, however, a moderate ministry was constituted with Antonio
Bermudo da Costa Cabral as its real, though not its nominal, head, and
by a pronunciamento of February 10, 1842, the Charter was restored to
operation. Costa Cabral (Count of Thomar after 1845) ruled
despotically until May, 1846, when by a combination of Miguelists,
Septembrists, and Chartists he was driven into exile.[872] The
Chartist ministry of Saldanha succeeded. In 1849 it was replaced by a
ministry under the returned Thomar, but by a rising of April 7, 1851,
Thomar was again exiled. At the head of a moderate coalition Saldanha
governed peacefully through the next five years (1851-1856). The
period was marked by two important developments. July 5, 1852, a
so-called "Additional Act" revised the Charter by providing for the
direct election of deputies, the decentralization of the executive,
the creation of representative municipal councils, and the abolition
of capital punishment for political offenses. A second fact of
importance was the amalgamation, in 1852, of the Septembrists and the
Chartists to form the party of Regeneradores, or Regenerators, in
support of the Charter in its new and liberalized form.
[Footnote 871: So called from the _coup d'état_ of
September, 1836, mentioned shortly.]
[Footnote 872: E. Bavoux, Costa Cabral; notes
historiques sur sa carrière et son ministère
(Paris, 1846).]
*698. Party Rivalries: the Rotativos.*--In the constitutional history of
the kingdom the reign of Pedro V. (1853-1861) possesses slight
importance. There was less civil strife than during the preceding
generation, but ministries took office in rapid succession and little
improvement was realized in practical political conditions. The period
covered by the more extended reign of Luiz I. (1861-1889) was of the
same character, save that its later years were given some distinction
by certain developments in the party situation. The death of the old
Chartist leader Saldanha in 1876 was followed, indeed, by the
appearance of a political alignment that was essentially new. Already
the Regeneradores, representing the Chartist-Septembrist coalition (p. 632)
of 1852, had disintegrated, and in 1877 the more radical elements of
the defunct party, known at first as the Historic Left, were
reorganized under the name of the Progressistas, or Progressives. The
new conservative elements, on the other hand, carried on the
traditions and preserved the name of the original Regeneradores. In
the Cortes the Progressistas assumed the position of a Constitutional
Left and the surviving Regeneradores that of a Conservative Right.
Both were monarchical and both were attached to the existing
constitution, differing only in respect to the amendments which they
would have preferred to introduce in that instrument. Of remaining
parties two were of importance, i.e., the Miguelists, representing
still the interests of absolutism, and the Republicans, who first
acquired definite party organization in 1881.
Between 1877 and 1910 the Regeneradores and the Progressistas shared
in rotation the spoils of office with such regularity that the two
acquired popularly the nickname of the _rotativos_. Both were
dominated by professional politicians whose skill in manipulating
popular elections was equalled only by their greed for the spoils of
victory. Successful operation of a parliamentary system presupposes at
least a fairly healthy public opinion. But in Portugal, upwards of
four-fifths of whose inhabitants are illiterate,[873] there has been
no such favoring condition, and the opportunity for the demagogue and
the cacique has been correspondingly tempting. Parties have been
regularly mere cliques and party politics only factional strife.
Throughout the period corruption was abundant and such public feeling
as existed was stifled systematically. Elections were supervised in
every detail by the provincial governors; agents of the Government
were employed to instruct the people in their choice of
representatives; and the voters did habitually precisely what they
were told to do. No one ever expected an election to show results
adverse to the Government. Especially unscrupulous was the manner in
which the preponderating parties obstructed systematically the
election of Republican and Independent deputies. As late as 1906 but
one Republican was returned to the Cortes, although it was a matter of
common knowledge that in many constituencies the party commanded a
clear majority.
[Footnote 873: By official calculation, 78.6 per
cent in 1900.]
*699. The Dictatorship of Franco, 1906-1908.*--From June, 1900, to
October, 1904, the Regeneradores were in power, with Ribeiro as
premier. During this period two national elections, in 1900 and in
1904, yielded the controlling party substantial majorities. From
October, 1904, the Progressive ministry of Luciano de Castro occupied
the field, but in the spring of 1906 there took place a series of
ministerial crises in the course of which Ribeiro returned for a (p. 633)
brief interval to power. The election of April 26, 1906, gave the
Regeneradores 113 seats, the Progressistas 30, and the Republicans 1.
The ministerial changes by which this election was accompanied
prepared the way for the establishment of the régime known in recent
Portuguese history as the _dictadura_, or dictatorship. The new
premier, João Franco, was one of the abler and more conscientious men
in public life. Originally a Regenerator, as early as 1901 he had led
a secession from the party, and in 1903 he had organized definitely a
third party, the Liberal Regenerators, whose avowed end was the
establishment in Portugal of true parliamentarism. In 1906 a "Liberal
Concentration" was effected between Franco's followers and the
Progressistas, led by Castro, and the outcome was the calling, May 19,
1906, of Franco to the premiership. That office he assumed with the
determination to introduce and to carry through an elaborate programme
of sorely needed fiscal and administrative reforms. If possible, his
methods were to be entirely constitutional; if not, as nearly so as
might prove practicable. The Cortes elected April 26 met June 6 and,
being found unpromising, was dissolved. During the campaign which
followed the Regenerador party, to which Franco nominally belonged,
split, the Franquistas, or supporters of the premier, taking the name
of New Regenerators. The returns yielded by the election of August 12
were: New Regenerators, 73 seats; Progressives, 43; Old Regenerators,
23; Republicans, 4; with scattering seats distributed among other
groups.
The sitting of the Cortes which began September 29, 1906, was one of
the stormiest on record. In May, 1907, when the Government seemed on
the point of collapse and it was supposed that Franco would resign,
the indomitable premier effected a _coup d'état_ whereby the ministry
was reconstituted, the Cortes was dissolved, and several important
bills which were pending were proclaimed to have acquired the force of
law. During the ensuing twelvemonth the government was that of a
benevolent but uncompromising dictatorship. Supported by the king, the
army, and a considerable body of partisans, Franco succeeded in
carrying through the major portion of his reform programme. But he was
opposed by the Republicans, by the professional politicians of the
older parties, and by the entire hierarchy of administrative and
judicial officials who shrank from impending investigation. His task
was enhanced tremendously by the growing unpopularity of King Carlos,
and in defense of the sovereign it was found necessary to deprive the
House of Peers of its judicial functions, to replace the district and
municipal councils by commissions named by the crown, and, in short,
to suspend virtually all remaining vestiges of popular government, (p. 634)
as well as the various guarantees of individual liberty.
*700. Restoration of Normal Conditions.*--February 1, 1908, when the
situation bordered on revolution, King Carlos and the crown prince
Louis Philippe were assassinated and the dictatorship of Franco was
brought abruptly to an end. The king's second son, who succeeded under
the title of Manoel II., called together an extraordinary junta of
ministers and party leaders, at whose instigation the imperious
premier resigned and withdrew from the country; whereupon, under the
premiership of Admiral Ferreira do Amaral, there was formed a
coalition ministry, representative of all of the monarchist parties.
The administrative commissions created by Franco were dissolved; the
civil list, concerning which there had been grave controversy, was
reduced; the House of Peers was reconstituted; the election of a new
Cortes was ordered; and parliamentary institutions, suspended for a
year, were revived. The various reforms, on the other hand, for which
the dictator had been responsible were brought likewise to an end. The
election of April 5, attended by grave disorders, yielded the
Government a decisive majority and, April 29, the new sovereign
formally opened the first Cortes of his reign and took oath to support
the constitution. In the Chamber the old balance between the
Regeneradores and the Progressistas reappeared. Of the former there
were 61; of the latter, 59. The Republicans had 7 seats; a group of
"Nationalists," 3; the Independents, 1; and the "Amaralists," detached
supporters of the ministry, 17. Before the end of the year the
Government lost its majority, and December 24 a new coalition cabinet
was made up by Campos Henriques, a former minister of justice.[874]
[Footnote 874: On the political history of Portugal
since the establishment of constitutionalism see
Cambridge Modern History, XI., Chap. 20, XII.,
Chap. 10; and Lavisse et Rambaud, Histoire
Générale, XI., Chap. 9, XII., Chap, 9. A
serviceable general work is J. P. Oliveira Martins,
Historia de Portugal (4th ed., Lisbon, 1901). An
older and more detailed treatise is H. Schaefer,
Geschichte von Portugal (2d ed., Hamburg, 1874),
and a useful survey is R. de Vezeley, Le Portugal
politique (Paris, 1890). For a good brief survey of
Portuguese party politics see A. Marvaud, La crise
en Portugal et les élections d'avril 1908, in
_Annales des Sciences Politiques_, July, 1908.]
II. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM
*701. The Constitution.*--Before speaking of the revolution of 1910, in
consequence of which the monarchy was overthrown and the present
republic was established, it is desirable that brief allusion be made
to the governmental system of the earlier régime. The fundamental law
in operation in 1910 was the _Carta Constitucional_ of 1826, (p. 635)
remodelled and liberalized by numerous amendments. The revision
accomplished by the Additional Act of 1852 has been mentioned. An
amendment of July 24, 1885, provided for the gradual extinction of the
right of hereditary peers to sit in the upper house and for the
representation, in the Deputies, of minorities; while three amendments
of importance during the reign of Carlos I. (1889-1908) were: (1) that
of March 28, 1895, whereby the number of deputies was reduced from 180
to 120 and the qualifications requisite for the exercise of the
suffrage were overhauled; (2) that of September 25 of the same year
whereby the elective portion of the House of Peers was abolished; and
(3) that of August 8, 1901, by which the conditions of election to the
House of Deputies were revised. In its final form the constitution was
an instrument of unusual length, comprising eight "titles" and 145
articles, some of which were very comprehensive.[875]
[Footnote 875: The text of the constitution was
published by the state under the title of Carta
Constitucional da Monarchia Portugueza ... e
Diplomas Correlativos (Lisbon, 1890). An annotated
translation is in Dodd, Modern Constitutions, II.,
145-179. An excellent treatise is J. J. Tavares de
Medeiros, Das Staatsrecht des Königsreichs Portugal
(Freiburg, 1892), in Marquardsen's Handbuch.
Important Portuguese works include L. P. Coimbre,
Estudios sobre a Carta Constitucional de 1814 e
Acto Addicional de 1852 (Lisbon, 1878-1880), and
Coelho da Rocha, Ensaio sobre a Historia do Governo
e da Legislaçao de Portugal.]
*702. The Crown and the Ministry.*--Provision was made for the exercise
of four distinct categories of powers, i.e., executive, moderative,
legislative, and judicial. Of these the first two were lodged in the
sovereign, the third in the sovereign and Cortes conjointly, and the
fourth in tribunals established under provision of the constitution.
The crown was vested permanently in the descendants of Dona Maria II.,
of the House of Braganza, and, in default thereof, in the nearest
collateral line. The succession was regulated on the principle of
primogeniture, with preference to the male line, and during a
sovereign's minority the regency devolved upon the nearest relative,
according to the order of succession, who had attained the age of
twenty-five. Associated with the sovereign was a ministry and a
council of state. The ministry consisted of a premier, usually without
portfolio, and a variable number of heads of departments (in 1910,
seven),[876] and it was a principle of the constitution that, the
crown being legally irresponsible, no executive act might be adjudged
valid unless signed by one or more of the members of the ministerial
group. For all of their acts the ministers were responsible nominally
to the Cortes, although in point of fact the turbulent state of (p. 636)
politics rendered such responsibility nearly impossible to enforce.
The council of state was a body composed of the crown prince (when of
the age of eighteen) and of twelve men appointed by the king for life,
usually from present or past ministers. It was required that the
council be consulted in all affairs of weight and in general measures
of public administration, especially those relating to the declaration
of war, the conclusion of peace, and the conduct of diplomatic
negotiations.[877]
[Footnote 876: Foreign Affairs, Interior, Finance,
Justice and Worship, War, Marine and Colonies, and
Public Works.]
[Footnote 877: Arts. 107-112. Dodd, Modern
Constitutions, II., 168-169.]
Aside from participation in legislation, the powers of the crown
(exercised at least nominally through the intermediary of the
ministers and councillors) were, as has been said, of two categories,
executive and moderative. The powers of an executive character were of
the usual sort, i.e., the appointment of civil, military, and
ecclesiastical officials; the conduct of foreign relations; the
promulgation of the laws, and of decrees, instructions, and
regulations requisite to the proper execution of the laws; the
ordering, not less frequently than quadrennially, of an election of a
new Cortes; and the supervision, in conformity with the constitution,
of "all things which bear upon the internal and external security of
the state."[878] Among modern constitutions those of Portugal and
Brazil are unique in the distinction drawn between powers that are
executive and powers that are "moderative." Under the head of
moderative powers the Portuguese constitution vested in the crown the
nomination of peers, the convening of the Cortes in extraordinary
session, approval of the measures of the Cortes to the end that they
might acquire the force of law, the proroguing and adjourning of the
Cortes and the dissolving of the House of Deputies, the appointing and
dismissing of ministers, the granting of amnesties, and the remitting
or reducing of penalties imposed upon offenders by judicial sentence.
The theory was that these were powers which the sovereign exercised in
the capacity of mediator between the several organs of the
governmental system, and by the constitution it was declared that this
moderative power was the keystone of the entire political
organization. The distinction, however, while from a certain point of
view logical enough, does not appear to have possessed much practical
importance.
[Footnote 878: Arts. 75-77. Ibid., II., 162-164.]
*703. The Cortes.*--Powers of a legislative character were vested in the
sovereign conjointly with a parliament of two chambers, the _Camara
dos Pares_, or House of Peers, and the _Camara dos Deputados_, or
House of Deputies. Collectively, the two houses were known as the
_Cortes Feraes_, or, more briefly, the Cortes. Until 1885 the House of
Peers consisted of members of two classes, those who sat by (p. 637)
hereditary right and those who were nominated by the crown for life.
By the constitutional amendment of July 24, 1885, hereditary peerages
were put in the way of gradual abolition and it was stipulated that
when they should have been extinguished the chamber should be composed
of princes of the royal blood, the archbishops and bishops of Portugal
proper, 100 members appointed by the king for life, and 50 members
elected every new parliament by the lower chamber. By amendment of
September 25, 1895, however, the 50 elective peerages were abolished
and the number of royal appointees was reduced to 90. In 1910,
therefore, the chamber was made up of (1) princes of the royal blood
who had attained the age of twenty-five; (2) surviving peers whose
hereditary right antedated 1885, together with their immediate
successors; (3) the Patriarch of Lisbon and the archbishops and
bishops of the continental territory of the kingdom; and (4) the 90
life peers nominated by the crown. In the nomination of peers the
crown was restricted only by the requirement that members must have
attained the age of forty and must be able to meet a considerable
property qualification.
The House of Deputies, as regulated by the law of August 8, 1901, was
composed of 155 members, of whom 148 represented the 26 electoral
circles of Portugal, the Azores, and Madeira,[879] and 7 represented
the colonies. By amendment of 1885 provision was made for the
representation of minorities, and of the 155 members in 1910, 35 sat
as minority representatives. This result was attained through an
arrangement whereby in circles which elected more than one deputy each
elector voted for one or two fewer than the number of seats to be
filled. Deputies were chosen by direct election, and in the choice all
male citizens twenty-one years of age were entitled to participate,
provided they paid taxes aggregating 500 _reis_ (about 56 cents)
annually or were able to read and write. Convicts, beggars, bankrupts,
domestic servants, workingmen permanently employed by the state, and
soldiers and sailors below the rank of commissioned officer were
disqualified. In point of fact, the prevalence of poverty and of
illiteracy operated to confine the franchise within very narrow
limits. Peers, naturalized aliens, persons not qualified to vote, and
certain employees of the state were ineligible for election, and
deputies were required to possess an income of not less than 400
milreis ($425) annually, or to be graduates of a professional,
secondary, or higher school. After 1892 no deputies, save those
representing the colonies, were paid salaries.
[Footnote 879: The Azores and Madeira are regarded
as integral parts of the nation.]
Sessions of the Cortes were required to be opened by the crown on (p. 638)
the second day of January of each year. According to the amendment of
July 24, 1885, a regular session lasted three months and each Cortes,
unless sooner dissolved, lasted three years. The president and
vice-president of the House of Peers were appointed by the crown;
likewise the corresponding officials of the House of Deputies, from a
list of five nominees presented by that body. Each chamber was
authorized to choose its own secretaries, to pass upon the qualifications
of its members, and to frame its rules of procedure. Except at times
when the welfare of the state demanded secrecy, sessions were required
to be public. To the lower chamber was committed the initiative in all
matters pertaining to taxation, the recruiting of troops, the
investigation of the administrative offices, and the consideration of
propositions submitted by the executive. Upon it, likewise, was
conferred exclusive power to impeach ministers and councillors of
state. The right to initiate measures in general was vested in each of
the two houses, as well as in the Government. Ministers were
privileged to attend legislative sessions and to participate in
debate. It was required that the sovereign should give or refuse his
approval of every measure within a month after it should have been
presented to him.[880]
[Footnote 880: Arts. 45-62. Dodd, Modern
Constitutions, II., 156-159.]
*704. The Judiciary and Local Government.*--The judicial hierarchy
consisted of 193 courts of first instance, one in each of an equal
number of _comarcas_, or districts; three courts of appeal, sitting at
Lisbon, Oporto, and Ponta Delgada (in the Azores); and a Supreme Court
at Lisbon. Judges were appointed by the crown, and were irremovable
save in consequence of judicial sentence. In the trial of criminal
cases the English jury system was in vogue, although it operated but
indifferently. The functions of the Supreme Court were those of
hearing appeals from the inferior tribunals, trying cases involving
judges of the appellate courts and members of the diplomatic corps,
and deciding conflicts of jurisdiction.[881]
[Footnote 881: Arts. 118-131. Ibid., II., 169-171.]
Early in the nineteenth century continental Portugal was divided for
administrative purposes into six provinces, delimited in a large
measure in accordance with the physical configuration of the country.
In 1836 the province ceased to be an administrative unit and, after a
period of readjustment, there was established by law of March 18,
1842, an administrative hierarchy which in its more important aspects
has survived to the present day. Under that measure the realm was
divided into 21 districts (17 continental and 4 insular), 292
_concelhos_, or communes (263 continental and 29 insular), and 3,690
_freguezias_, or parishes (3,788 continental and 172 insular). (p. 639)
Until 1910 the government of the district was vested in a commission
consisting of two members appointed by the central authorities and
three elected triennially by delegates from the communal councils. Of
the two centrally appointed members, one, the governor, presided over
the commission; the other was an administrative auditor. Among the
functions of the commission was that of sitting as an administrative
court. The commune was governed by a mayor, appointed by the central
authorities on nomination of the governor of the district, and a
council of five to fifteen members elected on a single ticket by the
communal voters. The council was presided over, not by the mayor, but
by one of its own members. The governing agencies of the parish were
an elected council (_junta de parochia_), presided over by the parish
priest, and the _regidor_, named by the district governor to represent
the interests of the central government. Throughout the entire system
the preponderating fact was the thoroughgoing centralization which,
through the governors, mayors, and _regadores_, the authorities at
Lisbon were able to maintain.
III. THE REVOLUTION OF 1910
*705. Political Unsettlement, 1908-1910.*--The period of two and a half
years which elapsed between the accession of Manoel II., in February,
1908, and his deposition, in October, 1910, was one of continued
political stress. The sovereign was youthful, inexperienced, and
lacking in political training. His advisers were divided in their
counsels and impelled largely by selfish motives, and in the teeth of
rapidly spreading republican and socialist propaganda the old dynastic
parties kept up unremittingly their unseemly recriminations. In
February, 1909, the king called into consultation the leaders of the
various monarchist groups and sought to impress upon them the
necessity of co-operation, and when the Cortes was convened, March 1,
the Speech from the Throne announced optimistically a programme of
constructive legislation, embracing, among other things, the enactment
of more liberal press laws, a reform of primary education, and a
readjustment of taxation. Within the Cortes, however, it was found
impossible to carry any one of the measures proposed and, March 29,
the Henriquez ministry, after only three months in office, resigned.
During the remainder of the year three successive ministries were set
up: that of General Sebastiano Telles, which lasted only from April 11
until May 4; that of Wencelao de Lima, extending from May 4 to
December 21; and that of Beirao, which continued from December 21 to
early June of the following year. The De Lima cabinet was formed from
elements which stood largely outside the swirl of party politics, (p. 640)
but the Republican and Regenerador opposition was so intense that
nothing could be accomplished by it. The Beirao government by which it
was succeeded was composed entirely of Progressives. The Speech from
the Throne at the convening of the Cortes, January 2, 1910, ignored
completely the grim realities of the political situation. Ostensibly
to afford the Beirao ministry an opportunity to formulate a programme,
the session was adjourned until March 3, at which time the members
reassembled, only to be sent back again to their homes until June 1.
At the second reassembling the ministry was opposed with such
virulence that it at once retired and, after some delay, the
Regeneradors came into power under Teixeira de Sousa. The Cortes was
dissolved and a national election, accompanied by grave disorders, was
held, August 28. At the election the Regeneradors obtained 80 seats,
the Progressives 43, the Republicans 14 (twice as many as they had
ever obtained before), and the Independents 2.[882] The new Cortes
assembled September 23; but two days later it was adjourned until
December 12, and, in point of fact, it never sat again.
[Footnote 882: Ten of the fourteen Republican
deputies were elected in Lisbon. The popular vote
in that city was: Republicans, 15,104; Monarchists
of all parties, 9,108. In 1908 the numbers were
13,074 and 10,982 respectively.]
*706. Overthrow of the Monarchy.*--During many months a plot had been
ripening in Republican circles looking toward the deposition of the
king, the overthrow of the monarchy, and the proclamation of a
republic. By reason of the confusion and repression which prevailed
perennially in Portuguese politics, the actual strength, numerically
and otherwise, of republicanism in the kingdom in 1910 cannot be
known. But it is sufficiently clear that the propaganda of the past
thirty years had borne much fruit and that among the artisan, trader,
and small burgher classes, and especially in the ranks of the army and
the navy, the enemies of the monarchy had come to be numerous and
influential. The leaders of the republican movement represented, on
the whole, the best educated and most progressive elements of the
country--largely lawyers, physicians, journalists and other men of the
professions and of business. In the later summer of 1910 various
intimations of a far-reaching revolutionary plot were received by the
Government and the date (September 14) which was at one time fixed for
the insurrection proved an impracticable one because the authorities
became aware of the project and subverted the republican plans by
ordering the warships on that day to quit the Tagus. Within official
circles it was generally assumed that the revolutionists, balked once,
would return to the project. The crash came, however, at a moment (p. 641)
when the Government was entirely off its guard, and its effects were
unexpectedly summary. The immediate incident by which it was
precipitated was the assassination in Lisbon, October 3, of a
distinguished Republican member of the Cortes, Dr. Miguel Bombarda.
Whether justly or not, the assassination was interpreted by the
populace as a political crime, and to the disaffected elements of the
army and navy the occasion seemed ripe for the execution of the
contemplated _coup_. October 4 open revolt broke out among the
national troops, and during the ensuing forty-eight hours a handful of
soldiers and sailors, aided by armed civilians, acquired the mastery
of the capital, put the king to flight, won over the country to their
cause, and proclaimed the establishment of a republican form of
government. The revolutionists were organized, the royalists were not,
and the defeat of the latter was complete. It was also substantially
bloodless. King Manoel, and the queen-mother Amelia, contriving an
escape from the royal palace, made their way to Eraceira, and thence
to Gibraltar. Subsequently they were conveyed to England.
*707. Measures of the Provisional Government.*--Meanwhile, October 5,
there was established at Lisbon a provisional government composed of
nine ministers and presided over by the scholar and litterateur,
Theophile Braga. The members of this government were drawn principally
from the group of Republican deputies representing the Lisbon
constituencies. A few had held high office under the monarchy, but
most of them, including Braga, were men of little or no experience in
administrative work. The flight of the king and the collapse of the
monarchist cause cleared the way for a speedy establishment of the new
order, and without awaiting a formal remodelling of the constitution,
the Braga government proceeded to carry into execution a number of
features of the Republican programme. October 7 it promised amnesty to
political and press exiles, the revocation of various illiberal press
and judicial laws, the suppression of summary magisterial powers, and
a long list of other administrative and judicial reforms. October 18
it abolished the monarchy and proscribed forever the royal house of
Braganza. On the same day it abolished likewise the Council of State
and the House of Peers, together with all hereditary titles and
privileges. In the course of further measures of reform relating to
public finance, agriculture, education, religion, and social welfare,
it issued a new electoral law and effected arrangements for the
convening of a national assembly to which should be committed the task
of framing a republican constitution. The electoral decree of March
15, 1911, conferred the franchise upon all Portuguese citizens of the
age of twenty-one who under the monarchy were entitled to its
exercise, and upon all, in addition, who were able to read and (p. 642)
write, barring soldiers, bankrupts, and ex-convicts. The two cities,
Lisbon, and Oporto, were created electoral districts in each of which
eight members were to be chosen by _scrutin de liste_ after the
Belgian, or d'Hondt, plan of proportional representation, and the
remainder of the country (including the colonies) was divided into
districts in each of which four members were to be chosen, also with
provision for the representation of minorities.
*708. The Constitution Framed and the Government Organized.*--The
elections to the Constituent Assembly took place May 28, 1911. There
were no monarchist candidates and, there having been neither time nor
occasion for the appearance of serious differences among the
Republicans, the event was attended by little excitement and by no
disorder. In many districts the candidates approved by the Provisional
Government were unopposed. The Assembly was convened June 19. By
unanimous vote of its 192 members the decree by which the monarchy had
been abolished and the Braganza dynasty banished was enacted into law,
whereupon the body addressed itself to the framing of a budget and the
adoption of organic laws relating to the nature and manner of exercise
of the political powers of the republic. A draft of the constitution,
framed by the Republican leaders, was read to the delegates July 3,
and August 18 it was voted, amid general acclamations, almost without
modification. The presidential election was fixed for August 23. Of
the two principal candidates, Dr. Manoel Arriaga represented the more
moderate wing of the Republican element, Dr. Machado Santos (the
provisional president) the more radical. Dr. Arriaga was elected by a
vote of 121 to 86. August 24 the Assembly terminated its proceedings
and the new constitution was put in operation. The first cabinet,
presided over by João Chagas, was announced at the beginning of
September. It was at this point that France, Spain, and a number of
other European powers for the first time recognized officially the
republic's existence. The difficulties encountered by the new
régime--royalist invasions, outbreaks of disaffection, strikes, lack
of funds--were numerous. Not the least serious was the inevitable rise
of differences among the Republicans themselves. During the autumn of
1911 the Moderates split into two rival groups, and the more important
of them, led by Dr. Almeida, definitely withdrew its support from the
Government. The result was a ministerial crisis, and November 7 the
Chagas cabinet resigned. The new "ministry of concentration" formed by
the radical Vasconcellos was composed of eight members divided almost
equally between the Moderates and the Democrats. In more recent days
the lines of party cleavage have tended to be accentuated and the (p. 643)
stability, if not the existence, of the republic to be increasingly
menaced. In June, 1912, a new ministry was constituted under Leite, in
which all of the groups in the lower chamber were represented. There
is reason to apprehend that, in the event of the survival of the
republic, the outcome will be at best but the resuscitation, under
other names and forms, of the long-endured rotativist régime.
IV. THE CONSTITUTION OF 1911
*709. Constitutional Guarantees: Amendment.*--Aside from five articles
of a temporary nature, the constitution of 1911 is arranged in
eighty-two articles, grouped in seven "titles" or divisions. The two
divisions of principal length are those which relate to the rights and
liberties of the individual and the organs and exercise of sovereign
power. The guarantees extended the individual comprise a bill of
rights hardly paralleled in comprehensiveness among the constitutions
of European nations. To Portuguese citizens and to aliens resident in
the country are pledged full liberty of conscience, freedom of speech,
freedom of the press, liberty of association, inviolability of
domicile and of property, the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus,
privacy of correspondence, and freedom of employment and of trade save
only when restriction is required for the public good. Law is declared
to be uniform for all and no public privilege may be enjoyed by reason
of birth or title. No one may be required to pay a tax which has not
been levied by the legislative chambers or by an administrative
authority specifically qualified by law, and, save in case of
enumerated offenses of serious import, no one may be imprisoned except
upon accusation according to the forms of law. No one may be compelled
to perform an act, or to refrain from the performance of an act,
except by warrant of law.
The constitution is subject to amendment under regulations of a
somewhat curious character. Revision of the fundamental law may be
undertaken normally by Congress at the end of every decennial period,
the Congress whose mandate coincides with the period of revision being
endowed automatically with constituent powers and the process of
revision differing in no respect from that of ordinary legislation. At
the end of a five-year period from the date of promulgation, however,
amendment may be undertaken, providing two-thirds of the members of
the chambers sitting jointly vote favorably. Under all circumstances
amendments must be specific rather than general, and in no case may an
amendment be received or debated which has for its object the
abolition of the republican form of government.
*710. The President and the Ministry.*--Sovereignty is lodged in (p. 644)
the nation, and the organs of the sovereign will are the independent
but supposedly harmonious executive, legislative, and judicial
authorities. The powers of the executive are exercised by the
President and the ministers. The President is chosen by the two houses
of Congress assembled in joint session sixty days prior to the
expiration of the presidential term. Voting is by secret ballot and a
two-thirds majority is required for election, although in default of
such a majority choice is made on the third ballot by simple plurality
between the two candidates receiving the largest number of votes. If
the office falls vacant unexpectedly the chambers choose in the same
manner a president to complete the unexpired term. The term is four
years, and after retiring from office an ex-president may not be
re-elected for a full term prior to the lapse of four more years. Only
native Portuguese citizens at least thirty-five years of age are
eligible. Without the permission of Congress the President may not
absent himself from the national territory, and he may be removed from
office by the vote of two-thirds of the members of the chambers
sitting jointly. The duties of the President are, among other things,
to negotiate treaties and to represent the nation in its external
relations generally, to appoint and dismiss the ministers and public
officials, to summon the Congress in extraordinary session, to
promulgate the laws of Congress, together with the instructions and
regulations necessary for their enforcement, and to remit and commute
penalties. If two-thirds of the members of the chambers so request,
projected treaties of alliance must be laid before Congress, and the
appointment and suspension of public officials may be effected only on
proposal of the ministers. Every act of the President must be
countersigned by at least one minister, and every minister is
responsible politically and legally for all acts which he countersigns
or executes. One member of the ministerial group, designated by the
President, exercises the functions of premier. Ministers may be
members of Congress, and in any case they are privileged to appear in
the chambers to defend their acts. Among offenses for which ministers
may be held to account in the ordinary tribunals the constitution
specifies all acts which tend to subvert the independence of the
nation, the inviolability of the constitution and of the republican
form of government, the political and legal rights of the individual,
the internal peace of the country, or the probity of administrative
procedure. The penalty imposed for guilt in respect to any of these
offenses is removal from office and disqualification to hold office
thereafter.[883]
[Footnote 883: Provisions relating to the executive
are contained in Arts. 36-55.]
*711. Congress.*--The exercise of legislative power is vested (p. 645)
exclusively in Congress. There are two houses, the Council of
Municipalities, or senate, and the National Council, or chamber of
deputies. The members of both are chosen by direct vote of the people.
Senators are elected for six years, one-half of the body retiring
triennially. Each district returns three members, but to assure the
representation of minorities electors are permitted to vote for but
two. Members of the Chamber of Deputies are chosen for three years.
Senators must be at least thirty-five years of age and deputies
twenty-five. Congress is required to meet in regular session each year
on the second day of December. The period of a session is four months,
and a prorogation or an adjournment may be ordered only by the
chambers themselves. Extraordinary sessions may be convoked by
one-fourth of the members or by the President. Each chamber is
authorized to judge the qualifications of its members, to choose its
president and other officers, and to fix its rules of procedure. The
presiding official at joint sessions is the elder of the two
presidents. Members are accorded the usual privileges of speech and
immunities from judicial process, and they are guaranteed compensation
at rates to be regulated by law.
The functions and powers of the chambers are enumerated in much
detail. Most important among them is the enactment, interpretation,
suspension, and abrogation of all laws of the republic. Still more
comprehensive is the power to supervise the operation of the
constitution and of the laws and "to promote the general welfare of
the nation." More specifically, the chambers are authorized to levy
taxes, vote expenditures, contract loans, provide for the national
defense, create public offices, fix salaries, regulate tariffs, coin
money, establish standards of weights and measures, emit bills of
credit, organize the judiciary, control the administration of national
property, approve regulations devised for the enforcement of the laws,
and elect the President of the republic. To the Chamber of Deputies is
accorded the right to initiate all measures relating to taxes, the
organization of the forces on land and on sea, the revision of the
constitution, the prorogation or adjournment of legislative sessions,
the discussion of proposals made by the President, and the bringing of
actions against members of the executive department. Initiative in
respect to all other matters may be taken by any member of either
branch of Congress or by the President of the republic. A measure
which is adopted by a majority vote in each of the two houses is
transmitted to the President to be promulgated as law. The President
possesses not a shred of veto power. He is required to promulgate
within fifteen days any measure duly enacted; if he fails to do so,
the measure takes effect none the less. When the chambers fall into
disagreement regarding proposed changes in a bill, or when one (p. 646)
chamber rejects a bill outright, the subject is debated and a decision
is reached in joint session.
*712. The Judiciary and Local Government.*--The organs of judicial
administration comprise courts of first instance, courts of appeal,
and a supreme tribunal sitting at the capital. Judges are appointed
for life, but may be removed from office in accordance with procedure
to be established by law. The employment of the jury is optional with
the parties in civil cases but obligatory in all criminal cases of
serious import. With respect to local government the constitution goes
no further than to lay down certain general principles and to enjoin
that the actual working arrangements be regulated by subsequent
legislation. Among the principles enumerated are the immunity of the
local authorities from intervention on the part of the central
executive power, the revision of the acts of the public officials in
administrative tribunals, the fiscal independence of the local
governmental units, and, finally, the employment for local purposes of
both proportional representation and the referendum.[884]
[Footnote 884: A French translation of the
Portuguese constitution of 1911 will be found in
_Revue du Droit Public_, Oct.-Dec, 1911. Various
aspects of the revolution of 1910 and of subsequent
developments are discussed in E. J. Dillon,
Republican Portugal, in _Contemporary Review_,
Nov., 1910; R. Recouly, La république en Portugal,
in _Revue Politique et Parlementaire_, Nov. 10,
1910; W. Archer, The Portuguese Republic, in
_Fortnightly Review_, Feb., 1911; and A. Marvaud,
Les débuts de la république portugaise, in _Annales
des Sciences Politiques_, March-April and May-June,
1911. The subject is covered briefly in V. de B.
Cunha, Eight Centuries of Portuguese Monarchy
(London, 1911), and A. Marvaud, Le Portugal et ses
colonies; étude politique et économique (Paris,
1912).]
INDEX (p. 647)
_Abgeordnetenhaus._ See Prussia and Austria.
Administration, development in Great Britain, 176-179;
present system, 180-191;
development of Prussian system, 265-273;
in France under Old Régime, 341-342;
during Revolutionary and Napoleonic era, 342-343;
present system, 345-351;
in Italy, 383-385;
in Austria, 485-488;
in Hungary, 506-507;
in Holland, 532-533;
in Belgium, 550-551;
in Denmark, 569;
in Norway, 588;
in Sweden, 601;
in Spain, 627-628;
in Portugal, 638-639, 646.
Alsace-Lorraine, original organization, 282;
the Landesausschuss, 283;
movement for autonomy, 284;
bill of 1910, 285;
present governmental system, 286-287.
_Ausgleich_. See Austria-Hungary.
Austria:--
--_Abgeordnetenhaus_, composition, 466;
electoral system to 1873, 466-467;
Taaffe bill of 1893, 467-468;
electoral law of 1896, 468;
electoral law of 1907, 469-471;
electoral qualifications and procedure, 471-472;
sessions and procedure, 472-473;
powers, 473-474.
--Administration, of province, 485-487;
of commune, 487-488.
--Amendment, of constitution, 461.
--_Ausgleich_, established, 458-459;
and political parties, 475-476;
nature, 509.
--Babenbergs, 442.
--Badeni, electoral bill, 468;
ministry, 479.
--Beck, carries electoral reform, 469-470.
--Bienerth, ministry, 482.
--Bohemia, language question in, 480.
--Charles V., 443.
--Christian Socialist Party, 483.
--Citizens, rights of, 462.
--Civil list, 464.
--Commune, organization, 487-488.
--Constitution, promulgated in 1848, 454;
abrogated, 455;
experiments of 1860-1861, 456-457;
texts, 460;
style of government, 460-461;
amendment, 461.
--Courts, ordinary, 483-484;
administrative, 484-485.
--Crown. See Emperor.
--Diet, provision for in constitution of 1848, 454.
--Diploma of 1860, 456.
--Elections, original system, 466;
law of 1873, 467;
Taaffe bill of 1893, 467-468;
law of 1896, 468;
law of 1907, 469-471;
qualifications and procedure, 471-472;
of 1901, 481;
of 1907, 481-482;
of 1911, 482-483.
--Emperor, status, 463;
powers, 464;
relation with ministries, 464.
--Franchise, law of 1873, 467;
Taaffe bill of 1893, 467-468;
law of 1896, 468;
law of 1907, 469-471;
present system, 471-472.
--Francis I., proclaimed emperor of Austria, 445.
--Francis Joseph I., accession, 455;
constitutional projects, 456-457;
and Compromise of 1867, 459;
encourages electoral reform, 469.
--Gautsch, promises electoral reform, 469;
ministries, 480-481.
--German Liberal Party, rise, 476;
rule, 476-477;
in the opposition, 477-478;
return to power, 478-479.
--Germans, in Empire, 475.
--Hapsburgs, 442.
--_Herrenhaus_, composition, 465;
organization and powers, 466;
sessions and procedure, 472-473.
--House of Lords. See _Herrenhaus_.
--House of Representatives. See _Abgeordnetenhaus_.
--Hungary, establishment of power in, 443;
encroachment in, 449-450;
suppression of revolution in, 455-456;
constitutional experiments with, 457-458;
_Ausgleich_ established, 458-459.
--Italians, in Empire, 475.
--Joseph II., reforms, 444.
--Judiciary. See Courts.
--Karlowitz, Peace of, 443, 448.
--Körber, ministry, 480-481.
--_Landesausschuss_, 485.
--_Landtag_, of province, 485-487.
--Maria Theresa, development of autocracy under, 444.
--Metternich, policies, 450-451;
combats liberalism, 452;
fall, 453.
--Ministry, composition, 464;
responsibility, 464-465.
--Parliament, composition, 465-466;
electoral system, 466-472;
sessions and procedure, 472-473;
powers, 473-474.
--Parliamentarism, nature of, 464-465;
nadir of, 480-481.
--Parties, centralism and federalism, 475-476;
rule of German Liberals, 476-477;
during Taaffe ministry, 477-478;
return of German Liberals to power, 478-479;
and parliamentary deadlock, 480-481;
and elections of 1907 and 1911, 481-483.
--Patent of 1861, 457.
--Plural Vote, under law of 1896, 468.
--Pragmatic Sanction, promulgated, 499.
--Province, executive officials, 485;
_Landtag_, 485-487.
--Race, political significance of, 470, 474-475, 479-480.
--_Reichsgericht_, 484.
--_Reichsrath_. See _Herrenhaus_ and _Abgeordnetenhaus_.
--Revolution of 1848, constitutionalism established, 454;
reaction, 455-456.
--Russia, intervenes in Austria, 455.
--Slavs, in Empire, 475.
--Social Democratic Party, demands for electoral reform, 469-470;
victory in 1911, 483.
--Succession, rules of, 449, 463.
--Taaffe, electoral bill of 1893, 467-468;
ministry, 477-478.
--Universal Suffrage Law, adoption, 469-470;
racial and geographical distribution of seats, 470;
electoral qualifications and procedure, 471-472.
--Vienna, Congress of, rôle of Austria in, 450.
--_Vorsteher_, 487.
Austria-Hungary (see also Austria and Hungary):--
--_Ausgleich_ established, 458-459;
nature, 509.
--Bosnia, annexation, 514;
constitution, 515;
governmental system, 515-516;
electoral arrangements, 516.
--Contributions. See Finances.
--Delegations, composition and sessions, 513;
powers, 513-514.
--Emperor, status, 510.
--Finance, ministry of, 511;
arrangements concerning, 512.
--Foreign Affairs, ministry of, 510.
--Herzegovina, annexation, 514;
constitution, 515;
government and electoral system, 515-516.
--King. See Emperor.
--Ministry, of foreign affairs, 510;
of war, 511;
of finance, 511.
--War, ministry of, 511.
Baden, granted a constitution, 197;
special privileges, 208;
governmental system, 279.
Bavaria, made a kingdom, 194;
granted a constitution, 197;
special privileges, 208;
governmental system, 275-276.
Belgium:--
--Administration, organization of province, 550-551;
organization of commune, 551.
--Amendment, process, 535.
--_Arrondissement_, electoral unit, 543-545;
judicial unit, 549.
--Austrian Netherlands, annexed to France, 517-518;
incorporated in United Netherlands, 519.
--Catholic Party, and electoral reform, 540-541;
and proportional representation, 542-543;
and elections of 1906-1910, 545-546;
triumph in 1912, 546-547.
--Commune, organization, 551.
--Conservative Party, and electoral reform, 540-541.
--Constitution, of 1815, 519-520;
of 1831 promulgated, 534;
democratic character, 534-535;
amendment, 535.
--Council, of province, 550.
--Court of Cassation, 549.
--Courts, organization and functions, 549-550.
--Crown, status and privileges, 536;
relation with ministry, 536-537;
powers, 537-538.
--Elections, earlier arrangements, 539-540;
law of 1893, 540-541;
franchise to-day, 541-542;
adoption of proportional representation, 543-545;
of 1906-1910, 545-546;
of 1912, 546-547.
--Franchise, prior to 1893, 539-540;
law of 1893, 540-541;
system to-day, 541-542;
demand for further reform, 547-548.
--Holland, separation from, 520-521.
--House of Representatives, composition, 539;
earlier electoral arrangements, 539-540;
electoral law of 1893, 540-541;
franchise to-day, 541-542;
organization and procedure, 548-549.
--Independence, declared, 520;
recognized, 521.
--Jury, use of, 550.
--Leopold I., crowned king, 521.
--Liberal Party, and electoral reform, 540-541;
favors proportional representation, 543;
opposition to plural vote, 547.
--Ministry, composition, 536;
responsibility, 536-537.
--Parliament, composition and election of senators, 538-539;
composition of House of Representatives, 539;
electoral system, 539-542;
proportional representation, 543-545;
organization and procedure of chambers, 548-549.
--Parliamentarism, 536-537.
--Plural Vote, 541-542;
opposition of Liberals and Socialists, 547-548;
in province, 551.
--Proportional Representation, adopted, 543;
operation, 543-545.
--Province, organization, 550-551.
--Revolution of 1830, 520-521.
--Senate, composition and election, 538;
qualifications, 539;
organization, and procedure, 548-549.
--Socialists, lead movement for electoral reform, 540-541;
favor proportional representation, 543;
opposition to plural vote, 547-548.
Bismark, Otto von, and establishment of German Empire, 199-201;
attitude toward socialism, 231;
reform of Prussian local government, 266-267.
Bosnia. See Austria-Hungary.
_Bundesrath_. See Germany and Switzerland.
Cabinet. See England.
Canton, of France, 343, 348;
of Switzerland, 409-422.
Chamber of Deputies. See France, Italy, Hungary.
Civil List, in Great Britain, 51-52;
of king of Prussia, 253;
of king of Italy, 368.
Committees, in English Parliament, 123-137;
in Bundesrath, 220;
in Reichstag, 226;
in Prussian Landtag, 264;
in French Parliament, 325-327.
Commune, in Prussia, 272-273;
antiquity in France, 348;
organization, 344-351;
in Italy, 385;
in Switzerland, 422;
in Austria, 487-488;
in Holland, 533;
in Belgium, 551;
in Norway, 588;
in Spain, 627;
in Portugal, 638-639.
Congress. See Portugal.
Congress of Deputies. See Spain.
Constitution, development of English, 2-41;
nature of English, 41-47;
of German Confederation of 1815, 194-196;
of German Empire, 202-204;
of Prussia, 250-252;
succession in France from 1791, 290-300;
of Third Republic, 304-306;
succession in Italy, 354-361;
of Italy to-day, 360-367;
of Switzerland, 410-416, 431-432;
of Austria, 456-461;
of Hungary, 446-448, 489-490;
of Holland, 519-523;
of Belgium, 534-535;
of Denmark, 557-559;
of Norway, 574, 578-579;
of Sweden, 589;
succession in Spain, 604-608;
of Spain to-day, 611-612;
of Portuguese republic, 642-643.
Cortes. See Spain and Portugal.
County, English, 171-184.
Courts, in England, 171-175;
in Germany, 243-244;
in France, 337-341;
in Italy, 381-383;
in Austria, 483-485;
in Holland, 531-532;
in Belgium, 549-550;
in Denmark, 568-569;
in Norway, 587-588;
in Spain, 626-627;
in Portugal, 638, 646.
Croatia, government, 507-508.
Crown, in Great Britain, 48-59;
in German Empire, 210-214;
in Prussia, 252;
in Italy, 368-370;
in Austria, 463-464;
in Hungary, 491;
in Holland, 523-525;
in Denmark, 554-561;
in Norway, 578-585;
in Sweden, 570-571, 590-591;
in Spain, 613-615;
in Portugal, 635-636.
Delegations. See Austria-Hungary.
Denmark:--
--Administration, 569.
--Christensen, ministry, 566-567.
--Christian VIII., and reform, 556-567.
--Christian IX., yields to parliamentary principle, 562.
--Conservative Party, resists parliamentary principle, 560-562;
dominance, 565-566.
--Constitution, of 1848, 557;
of 1849 promulgated, 557;
revised in 1866, 558-559;
process of amendment, 559.
--Courts, general principles, 568;
organization, 568-569;
act of 1908, 569.
--Crown, development, 554-555;
opposition to reform, 556;
status, 559;
powers, 560;
relations with ministry, 560-561.
--Diet, of provinces, 556.
--Elections, present system, 563;
projected reform, 564;
of 1906, 567;
of 1910, 567-568.
--Estrup, ministry, 561-562, 565-566.
--Franchise, present system, 563;
movement for reform, 564.
--Frederick VI., creates diets, 556.
--_Folkething_, composition, 563;
elections, 563-564;
sessions and powers, 564-565.
--_Höjesteret_, 568.
--Holstein, 558.
--Judiciary. See Courts.
--Kalmar, union of, 553.
--Kiel, treaty of, 554.
--King. See Crown.
--_Kongelov_, 555, 557.
--_Landsthing_, composition, 562;
qualifications, 563;
sessions and powers, 564-565.
--Lauenburg, 558.
--Liberal Party, pressure for parliamentary system, 560-562;
advent to power, 566.
--Malmö, treaty of, 553.
--Ministry, composition, 560-561;
responsibility, 561-562;
of Estrup, 561-562, 565-566;
recent instability, 567-568.
--Norway, united with, 553;
separated from, 554.
--Parliament. See _Rigsdag_.
--Parliamentarism, 560-562.
--Parties, rise, 565;
during Estrup's ministry, 565-566;
advent of Liberals to power, 566;
since 1903, 566-568.
--Proportional Representation, in election of senators, 563.
--Radical Party, 567-568.
--Revolution of 1660, 554-555.
--_Rigsdag_, composition, 562-563;
electoral system, 563-564;
sessions and power, 564-565.
--_Rigsrad_, 554.
--Schleswig, 558.
--Social Democratic Party, 567-568.
Elections, of British House of Commons, 92-96;
of _Reichstag_, 224-225;
of Prussian _Abgeordnetenhaus_, 258-263;
under Revolutionary and Napoleonic constitutions, 293-294;
present system in France, 318-322;
in Italy, 376-378, 400-402;
in Switzerland, 423, 426-428, 435-437;
in Austria, 466-483;
in Holland, 526-530;
in Belgium, 539-547;
in Denmark, 563-568;
in Norway, 581-582, 587;
in Sweden, 592-596, 600;
in Spain, 617-618, 624-625;
in Portugal, 633-642.
England:--
--Act of Settlement (1701), 49.
--Administration. See Local Government.
--Admiralty Board, 62.
--Asquith, H., resolutions for reform of Lords, 108.
--Attainder, 130.
--Bill of Rights, 32.
--Borough, in fifteenth century, 23;
franchise before 1832, 79;
franchise extended in 1832 and 1867, 82-84;
redistribution of parliamentary seats, 85;
organization before 1832, 177-178;
reform by Municipal Corporations Act, 178;
kinds, 187;
authorities, 188;
council and its functions, 189.
--Budget, preparation, 136.
--Cabinet, origins, 37-38;
relations with Privy Council, 60;
relations with ministry, 61;
composition, 64;
size, 65;
selection of premier, 66;
selection of other members, 67-68;
political solidarity, 69;
responsibility, 70;
proceedings, 71-73;
central position, 74.
--Campbell-Bannerman, Liberal leader, 154;
premier, 157.
--Chamberlain, Joseph, and the Liberal Unionists, 151;
tariff reform programme, 155.
--Chancery, Court of, 17, 174.
--Charles I., parliaments of, 28.
--Charles II., restoration, 31;
rise of cabinet, 37.
--Chartists, 82-83.
--Civil List, 51-52.
--Committees, kinds, 123;
of whole, 123;
select and sessional, 124;
standing, 124-125;
procedure on public bills, 133-134;
on money bills, 135-136;
on private bills, 137.
--Common Law, 167-168.
--Common Pleas, Court of, 17, 174.
--Commonwealth, 29.
--_Commune Concilium_, 7.
--Conservative Party, origin of name, 147;
mid-century ministries, 148-150;
Salisbury ministries, 151-153;
defeat in 1906, 157;
signification of nomenclature, 162;
present-day issues, 163;
composition, 164.
--Constitution, Anglo-Saxon foundations, 2-5;
influenced by Norman Conquest, 6-8;
in the Tudor period, 18-26;
in the Stuart period, 26-33;
elements of stability and change, 34;
development since seventeenth century, 34-41;
elusiveness, 41;
law and conventions, 42-43;
flexibility and amendment, 44-47.
--Conventions, in English constitution, 43.
--Corn Laws, repeal, 147.
--Corrupt and Illegal Practices Act, 95-96.
--County, franchise before 1832, 79;
franchise broadened in 1832, 82;
franchise liberalized in 1867 and 1884, 84;
court of, 171;
organization before 1832, 176-177;
reform by Local Government Act of 1888, 180;
present administrative organization, 183;
council and its functions, 183-184.
--Court of Appeals, 174.
--Courts, beginnings of great tribunals, 17;
county, 171;
justices of the peace, 171-172;
High Court, 173;
Court of Appeals, 174;
House of Lords, 130;
Judicial Committee of Privy Council, 175.
--Cromwell, Oliver, 29-30.
--Crown, in Anglo-Saxon times, 3;
effects of Norman Conquest on, 6;
independence under the Tudors, 21;
character under early Stuarts, 26;
abolished in 1640, 30;
restoration, 30;
regulated by Bill of Rights, 32-33;
decreased powers since seventeenth century, 35;
theoretical position, 48;
rules of succession, 49;
regencies, 50;
privileges, 50-52;
the prerogative, 52;
executive powers, 53-55;
legislative powers, 55;
veto, 56;
relations with ministry, 56-57;
actual service, 58;
reasons for survival, 59.
--Disraeli, Benjamin, prime minister, 150.
--District, rural, 184;
urban, 186.
--District and Parish Councils Act of 1894, 180.
--Edward I., and rise of Parliament, 12-13.
--Edward II., statute concerning Parliament, 15.
--Elections, writs, 92;
time regulations, 92-93;
polling, 93;
the campaign, 94;
expenditures, 95-96.
--Elizabeth, strong government, 21;
development of Parliament under, 24-25.
--Equity, rules of, 169.
--Exchequer, Court of, 17, 62, 174.
--Franchise, in fifteenth century, 23;
in early nineteenth century, 79;
extended by Reform Act of 1832, 82;
demands of the Chartists, 82-83;
modified in 1867, 83-84;
liberalized in 1884, 84-85;
the system to-day, 86-88;
question of the plural vote, 89-90;
Franchise Bill of 1912, 90;
woman's suffrage, 91.
--Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, 118.
--George III., attempted revival of royal power, 35.
--Gladstone, William E., leadership of Liberals, 148;
first ministry, 149;
second and third ministries, 151;
fourth ministry, 152.
--Great Council, 7.
--Henry I., charter, 7.
--Henry II., judicial measures, 8.
--Henry III., and beginnings of Parliament, 12.
--Henry VIII., strong government, 19.
--High Court of Justice, 173-174.
--House of Commons, origins, 13;
composition in 1485, 23;
changes in Tudor period, 24;
Apology of 1604, 27;
ascendancy over House of Lords, 36;
present composition, 77;
undemocratic character at opening of nineteenth century, 77-79;
electoral corruption, 80;
early demands for reform, 80;
Reform Act of 1832, 81-82;
Chartist agitation, 82-83;
Representation of the People Act of 1867, 83-84;
Representation of the
People Act of 1884, 84-85;
Redistribution of Seats Act of 1885, 85;
franchise and franchise questions to-day, 86-92;
electoral procedure and regulations, 92-96;
sessions, 117;
opening ceremonies, 117-118;
meeting place described, 118-120;
hours of sittings, 120;
officers, 121;
Speaker, 121-123;
quorum, 123;
committees, 123-125;
privileges, 126;
payment of members, 127;
procedure on public bills, 133-134;
on money bills, 135-136;
on private bills, 137-138;
provisional orders, 138;
rules, 139-141;
closure, 139;
the guillotine, 140;
votes and divisions, 140-141.
--House of Lords, origins, 13, 47;
composition in 1485, 22-23;
changes in Tudor period, 24;
abolished in 1640, 29;
restored in 1660, 31;
loss of priority to House of Commons, 36, 102;
composition, 97-101;
qualifications of members, 101;
number of members, 101;
question of reform, 102-103;
early reform proposals, 103-104;
conflicts with the Liberals, 104;
powers relating to money bills, 106;
rejection of Finance Bill of 1909, 107;
Liberal project of reform, 108;
Unionist proposals, 109;
adoption of Parliament Act of 1911, 110-111;
effects of the Act, 112-114;
sessions, 117;
opening ceremonies, 117-118;
sittings and attendance, 125;
officers, 125-126;
privileges, 127;
judicial functions, 130-132;
procedure, 141-142.
--Humble Petition and Advice, 30.
--Hundred, 4.
--Impeachment, 130.
--Independent Labor Party, 165.
--Instrument of Government, 29.
--Ireland, union of 1801, 40-41;
allotment of parliamentary seats, 85;
over-representation, 89;
representative peers, 98-99;
question of Home Rule, 150-152.
--James I., conception of monarchy, 26;
parliaments of, 28.
--James II., overthrown, 32.
--John, signs Magna Carta, 9;
holds council at Oxford, 12.
--Jury, use of, 171, 172.
--Justice of the Peace, functions, 171-172.
--King. See Crown.
--King's Bench, Court of, 17, 174.
--Labor Party, 165-167.
--Lansdowne Reconstruction Bill, 100.
--Law, origins, 167;
form, 168-169.
--Legislation, powers acquired by Parliament, 14-15.
--Liberal Party, conflict with House of Lords, 104;
and reform, 147;
regeneration under Gladstone, 148-149;
and Home Rule, 150;
secession of Unionists, 151;
rehabilitation, 156;
electoral triumph in 1906, 157;
mandate and performance, 158-159;
conflict with House of Lords, 159;
triumph in elections of 1910, 160;
carry Parliament Act of 1911, 110, 160;
signification of nomenclature, 162;
present-day issues, 163;
composition, 164.
--Liberal Unionists, origins, 151.
--Local Government Act of 1888, 180.
--Local Government Board, 180, 182.
--Local Government, periods in history, 176;
before 1835, 176-178;
mid-century confusion of areas, 179;
relations with central government, 181-182;
organization of administrative county, 183-184;
the rural district, 184;
rural and urban parish, 185;
urban district, 186;
boroughs and cities, 187-189;
London, 190-191.
--London, government, 190-191.
--Lord High Chancellor, 63.
--Lord Lieutenant, 172.
--Lords of Appeal, 99.
--Magna Carta, character and importance, 9.
--Ministry, appointment, 57, 66-69;
relation with Privy Council and Cabinet, 60-61;
Treasury, 62;
Admiralty Board, 62;
Lord High Chancellorship, 63;
the secretaries of state, 63-64;
the administrative boards, 64;
responsibility, 70, 128-130;
proceedings, 71-73.
--Money Bills, the Lords and, 106;
Liberal proposals concerning, 108;
disposition under Parliament Act of 1911, 112;
procedure upon, 135-136.
--Montfort, Simon de, parliaments of 1264 and 1265, 12.
--Municipal Corporation Act, 178.
--Newcastle Programme, 152.
--Parish, rural and urban, 185.
--Parliament, origins, 11;
Simon de Montfort's leadership, 12;
Model Parliament, 12-13;
bicameral principle established, 13;
fiscal and legislative powers, 14;
development of legislative process, 15;
composition in 1485, 23;
growth under Tudors, 24;
in Stuart period, 28-29;
experiments during Commonwealth and Protectorate, 29-30;
restoration in 1660, 31;
constituent powers, 45;
relations with crown, 55;
undemocratic character in early nineteenth century, 77-80;
Reform Act of 1832, 81-82;
Representation of the People Act of 1867, 83-84;
Representation of the People Act of 1884, 84-85;
Redistribution of Seats Act of 1885, 85;
franchise and franchise questions to-day, 86-92;
electoral procedure and regulations, 92-96;
composition of Lords, 97-101;
question of Lords reform, 102-109;
the Parliament Act of 1911, 110-114;
sessions, 117;
how opened, 117-118;
meeting place and sittings, 118-120;
officers and committees of Commons, 121-125;
organization of Lords, 125-126;
privileges of members, 126-127;
function of criticism, 128-130;
judicial functions, 130-132;
procedure on public bills, 133-134;
on money bills, 135-136;
on private bills, 137-138;
rules of Commons, 139-141;
procedure in Lords, 141-142.
--Parliament Act, origins, 106-110;
adoption, 110-111;
provisions, 112-113;
significance, 113-115.
--Parliamentarism, and parties, 143.
--Parties, beginnings, 38-39;
relation to parliamentary government, 143;
Tory ascendancy from 1783 to 1830, 145-146;
Liberals and reform, 147;
mid-century regeneration, 148-150;
rise of Liberal Unionists, 151;
Conservative ascendancy, 154-155;
Liberal revival, 156-157;
present significance of party names, 162;
current issues, 163-165;
labor and politics, 165-166.
--Plural Vote, 89-90.
--Poor Law, 178.
--Premier, selection, 66;
choice of colleagues, 67;
leadership, 72-73.
--Prince of Wales, 49.
--Private Legislation, 137-138.
--Privy Council, origins, 17;
under the Tudors, 19;
under Charles II., 37;
relations with ministry and cabinet, 60;
Judicial Committee as a court, 175.
--Protectorate, 29-30.
--Provisional Orders, 138.
--Poyning's Law, 40.
--Redistribution of Seats Act of 1885, 85-86.
--Referendum, Unionist proposal of, 109.
--Reform Act of 1832, 81-82.
--Regency, 50.
--Representation, beginnings of, 11.
--Representation of the People Act, of 1867, 83-84;
of 1884, 84-85.
--Rosebery, Lord, proposals for reform of Lords, 105, 108.
--Salisbury, Marquis of, first ministry, 157;
second ministry, 152;
third and fourth ministries, 153.
--Scotland, union of 1707, 39-40;
allotment of parliamentary seats, 85;
representative peers, 98-99.
--Shire, 5.
--Shire-moot, 5.
--Society for Constitutional Information, 81.
--Speaker, of House of Commons, history and functions, 121-123;
powers, 139.
--Star Chamber, Court of, 20.
--Stuarts, absolutism, 26;
overthrow, 29;
restored, 30;
finally expelled, 32.
--Supreme Court of Judicature, 173-175.
--Tariff Reform, rise and effects of issue, 155-156.
--Taxation, powers acquired by Parliament, 14, 22.
--Toleration Act, 33.
--Tory Party, rise, 39;
ascendancy from 1783 to 1830, 145-146.
--Township, 4.
--Treasury, 62.
--Tudors, popularity, 18;
relations with Parliament, 21.
--Unionists, position in Lords, 102-106.
--Westminster Palace, 116.
--Whig Party, rise, 39.
--William I., governmental policies, 6-7.
--William III., accession, 32.
--Witenagemot, 4.
--Woman's Suffrage, 91-92.
_Folkething_. See Denmark.
France:--
--_Adjoint_, 350.
--Administration, under Old Régime, 341-342;
overhauled in 1789-1791, 342;
revival of centralization, 343;
under Second Empire, 344;
changes under Third Republic, 345;
the department, 346-347;
the arrondissement, 347;
the canton, 348;
the commune, 348-351.
--Amendment, of constitution, 307, 327-328.
--Appeal, courts of, 338.
--_Arrondissement_, electoral unit, 318;
created, 343;
organization, 347.
--Assize, courts of, 338.
--Associations, law of, 331.
--_Ballottage_, 319.
--_Bloc_, rise, 331;
present condition, 332.
--Bonaparte, Napoleon, and constitution of the Year VIII., 293-295;
organization of local administration, 343.
--Bonapartists, policies in 1871-1875, 303-304.
--Bordeaux, National Assembly meets at, 302.
--Briand, A., programme of electoral reform, 322;
ministry, 332.
--Bureaus, in Parliament, 325-327.