CHAPTER VIII

CELTIC ART OF THE CHRISTIAN PERIOD

THE LEADING CHARACTERISTICS OF CELTIC ART OF THE

CHRISTIAN PERIOD IN GREAT BRITAIN, AND THE GENERAL

NATURE OF ITS DECORATIVE AND SYMBOLIC ELEMENTS

The leading characteristics of Celtic art of the Christian period are

as follows:—

(1) The prominence given to the margin or frame within which the

whole design is enclosed.

(2) The arrangement of the design within the margin in panels, each

containing a complete piece of ornament.

(3) The use of setting-out lines for the ornament, placed diagonally

with regard to the margin.

(4) The use of interlaced-work, step-patterns, key-patterns,

spirals, and zoömorphs in combination.

(5) The geometrical perfection of all the ornament.

(6) The superiority of the decorative designs to the figure drawing.

There are in the world two distinct schools of decorative art, one

which entirely ignores the shape of the surface to be ornamented, and

the other which allows the contour of the margin to influence the

whole design. Japanese art belongs to the first of these, and Celtic

art to the second. In the Irish illuminated MSS. the rectangular

shape of the page determines the setting-out of the design, which is

universally enclosed within a rectangular margin composed of lines of

various thicknesses, or within an ornamental panelled frame. The only

exception is in the case of the initial pages of the Four Gospels,

where the margin is incomplete, so as to allow the extremities of the

letters to project more nearly to the edge of the page. This prominence

given to the margin often greatly influences the designs within it,

more especially the key-patterns with diagonal setting-out lines. In

sculptured stonework either roll-mouldings or flat bands form the

margin, and in metalwork the margins are raised and the panels sunk.

The panels within the margin are generally rectangular, but sometimes

they are circular, annular, segmental, triangular, etc. The ornament

in adjoining panels is seldom of a similar kind, and the patterns

are often arranged on the principle of chequerwork, so that if there

is a panel of interlaced-work at the left-hand upper corner of the

page of a MS., and a panel of key-pattern at the left-hand lower

corner, the order will be reversed on the opposite side of the page,

and the key-pattern will be at the right-hand upper corner and the

interlaced-work at the right-hand lower corner.

The diagonal setting-out lines are chiefly confined to the

key-patterns, and, as we shall see subsequently, are the origin of the

peculiar form of Celtic key-pattern which was developed from the Greek

fret.

The various motives that have been specified—namely, interlaced-work,

step-patterns, key-patterns, spirals, and zoömorphs—are not always

found in combination, except in the MSS., sculptured stones, and

metalwork of the best period. The step-patterns are, as a rule, only

found in the early MSS. and on the enamelled settings of metalwork.

Foliage is a distinctly non-Celtic element, and wherever it occurs it

is a proof of Anglian influence from Northumbria. As the decadence

of Celtic art set in the spirals disappeared first, and then the

key-patterns, leaving only interlaced-work and zoömorphs, which

survived even after the Norman conquest. Key-patterns survived in

a debased form in the architectural details of the churches of the

twelfth century in Ireland, but not in Scotland or Wales.

By the geometrical perfection of the Celtic ornament is meant that

there are hardly ever any mistakes in the setting-out and complete

execution of the designs. Thus in the interlaced-work every cord laps

under and over with unfailing regularity (never over two or under two),

and all the cords are joined up so as not to leave any loose ends. All

the details of the spiralwork are executed with the minutest care,

and there is never a broken line or pseudo-spiral. In the zoömorphic

designs the beasts are all provided with the proper number of limbs and

are complete in every respect down to the smallest detail.

The inferiority of the figure drawing in Christian Celtic art to the

ornament will be dealt with subsequently in its proper place.

We will now proceed to examine in detail the different motives made use

of in the Celtic art of the Christian period in Great Britain.

INTERLACED-WORK

The interlaced ornament used in Celtic art may be divided into the

following classes:—

(1) Regular plaitwork, without any breaks.

(2) Broken plaitwork, with breaks made in an irregular way.

(3) Knotwork.

(4) Circular knotwork.

(5) Triangular knotwork.

(6) Ringwork or chainwork.

Interlaced-work is the predominant motive of the Celtic style of the

Christian period. It lasted longer in time than any other motive, and

its geographical distribution extends over a larger area. It is very

seldom that one motive is used by itself for the decoration of a stone

monument, metal object, or page of a MS.; but where this is the case

the motive chosen is invariably interlaced-work, and not a key-pattern,

spiral, or zoömorph. As instances of sculptured monuments decorated

entirely with interlaced-work we have the cross at Neuadd Siarman,

Brecknockshire, and the cross-shaft at St. Neot, Cornwall.

The evolution of knotwork from plaitwork cannot better be studied

anywhere than in the decoration of the Welsh crosses. Let us now

endeavour to trace the various stages in the process by which the

higher forms of Celtic interlaced-work were arrived at.

In Egyptian, Greek, and Roman decorative art the only kind of

interlaced-work is the plait, without any modification whatever;

and the man who discovered how to devise new patterns from a simple

plait by making what I term _breaks_ laid the foundation of all the

wonderfully complicated and truly bewildering forms of interlaced

ornament found in such a masterpiece of the art of illumination as

the Book of Kells in the library of Trinity College, Dublin. Although

we do not know _who_ made this discovery of how to make breaks in a

plait, we know pretty nearly _when_ it was made. In the decoration

of the mosaic pavements in Great Britain belonging to the period of

the Roman occupation, no instance, as far as I can ascertain, exists

of the introduction of a break in a plait; nor is there any break in

the plaitwork on the marble screen and the capitals of the columns of

the ciborium in the Church of San Clemente at Rome (which are dated

by R. Cattaneo[446] between A.D. 514 and 523). In the eighth century,

however, there are several examples with well-authenticated dates of

the use of true knotwork (as distinguished from plaitwork) in the

decoration of churches in Italy; namely, on the ciborium of San Giorgio

at Valpolicella[447] (A.D. 712); on the Baptistery of Calistus at

Cividale[448] (A.D. 737); and on the jambs of the doorway of the Chapel

of San Zeno in the Church of San Prassede at Rome[449] (A.D. 772-795).

[446] _L’Architettura in Italia_, pp. 29 and 31.

[447] _Ibid._, p. 80.

[448] _Ibid._, p. 87.

[449] _Archæologia_, vol. xl., p. 191.

It would appear, then, that the transition from plaitwork to knotwork

took place between the Lombard conquest of Italy under Alboin in A.D.

563, and the extinction of the Lombard monarchy by Charlemagne in

A.D. 774; possibly during the reigns of Luitprand (A.D. 712-736) and

Rachis (A.D. 744): for the name of the former king is mentioned in the

inscriptions on the Baptistery at Cividale and the ciborium of San

Giorgio at Valpolicella, and the latter on the altar at Cividale.

[Illustration: PLAITWORK ON ROMANO-BRITISH PAVEMENT AT LYDNEY PARK,

GLOUCESTERSHIRE (SIXTH CENTURY)]

[Illustration: PLAITWORK ON CIBORIUM IN THE CHURCH OF SAN CLEMENTE, ROME]

I now propose to explain how plaitwork is set out, and the method of

making breaks in it. When it is required to fill in a rectangular

panel with a plait the four sides of the panel are divided up into

equal parts (except at the ends, where half a division is left), and

the points thus found are joined, so as to form a network of diagonal

lines. The plait is then drawn over these lines, in the manner shown

on the accompanying diagram. The setting-out lines ought really to

be double so as to define the width of the band composing the plait,

but they are drawn single on the diagram in order to simplify the

explanation.

[Illustration: Regular plaitwork without any break]

[Illustration: Method of making breaks in plaitwork]

If now we desire to make a break in the plait any two of the cords

are cut asunder at the point where they cross each other, leaving

four loose ends A, B, C, D. To make a break the loose ends are joined

together in pairs. This can be done in two ways only: (1) A can be

joined to C and D to B, forming a vertical break; or (2) A can be

joined to D and C to B, forming a horizontal break. The decorative

effect of the plait is thus entirely altered by running two of the

meshes between the cords into one. By continuing the process all the

knots most commonly used in Celtic decorative art may be derived from a

simple plait.

[Illustration: Regular plaitwork, with one vertical break and one

horizontal break]

[Illustration: Six-cord plait, with horizontal breaks at regular

intervals]

[450] This occurs on the second panel of the cross at Llanbadarn Fawr.

Let us proceed to trace the process of the evolution of knotwork out of

plaitwork by actual instances taken from the Welsh crosses. We have, to

start with, good examples of plaits of four, six, and ten cords[451]

without any breaks at Nevern, Pembrokeshire; and Llantwit Major, and

Margam, Glamorganshire. Next, plaits with a single break only are to

be seen at Carew, Pembrokeshire, and Llantwit Major, Glamorganshire;

then plaits with several breaks, made quite regardless of symmetry or

order, at Golden Grove, Carmarthenshire; and, lastly, breaks made at

regular intervals, at Neuadd Siarman, Brecknockshire. When the breaks

are made symmetrically at regular intervals, and brought sufficiently

near together, the plait ceases to be the most prominent feature in the

design, and in its place we get a pattern composed entirely of what

(for want of a better name) are called knots. On some of the Welsh

crosses (as at Carew and Nevern, Pembrokeshire), however, the breaks

are made with sufficient regularity and proximity to produce knots,

and yet the knots themselves are not symmetrically placed. The result

is a class of interlaced-work, intermediate between plaitwork with

irregular breaks and knotwork. The same kind of thing is to be seen on

the crosses at Coppleston, Devonshire; and St. Neot, Cornwall.

[451] Plaits of an uneven number of cords are seldom used, because they

produce lopsided patterns.

[Illustration: Cross-shaft at Golden Grove, with panels of irregular

broken plaitwork

Scale ¹/₁₆ linear]

[Illustration: Cross-shaft at Llantwit Major (No. 5), Glamorganshire.

Eight-cord plait, with cruciform breaks

Scale ¹/₁₂ linear]

[Illustration: Eight-cord plaits, with cruciform breaks]

[Illustration: Eight-cord plaits, with cruciform breaks]

[Illustration: Six-cord plait, with cruciform breaks

(Occurring at Llanbadarn Fawr)]

[Illustration: Ten-cord plait, with cruciform breaks

(Occurring at St. Neuadd Siarman)]

[Illustration: Knots derived from a three-cord plait]

If two horizontal breaks and two vertical breaks are made next to each

other in a plait, a space in the shape of a cross is produced. A large

number of the interlaced patterns used in Celtic decorative art are

derived from a plait by making cruciform breaks at regular intervals.

There are examples of this in Wales, at Neuadd Siarman, Brecknockshire;

Llanbadarn Fawr, Cardiganshire; and Llantwit Major, Glamorganshire. It

is not unlikely that symbolism had something to do with the frequent

use of the cruciform break.

There are eight elementary knots which form the basis of nearly all the

interlaced patterns in Celtic decorative art, with the exception of

those already described. Two of the elementary knots are derived from a

three-cord plait, and the remaining six from a four-cord plait.

[Illustration: Knot No. 1]

[Illustration: Knot No. 2]

=Knot No. 1= is derived from a three-cord plait by making horizontal

breaks on one side of the plait only, and =No. 2= by making horizontal

breaks alternately on one side and the other.

=Knot No. 3= is derived from a four-cord plait by making horizontal

breaks in the middle of the plait.

=Knot No. 4= is derived from No. 3 by making a horizontal break at A;

and =No. 5= from No. 4 by making a vertical break at B and C.

=Knot No. 6= is derived from a four-cord plait by making horizontal

breaks in the middle of the plait, in the same way as in the case of

knot No. 3, but closer together.

[Illustration: Knot No. 4]

[Illustration: Knot No. 3]

[Illustration: Knot No. 5]

[Illustration: Knot No. 7]

[Illustration: Knot No. 6]

[Illustration: Knot No. 8]

=Knot No. 7= is derived from No. 6 by making a vertical break at B; and

=No. 8= from No. 6 by making vertical breaks at B and C.

If a series of knots repeated in a single row can be derived from a

plait of _n_ bands, a series of the same knots repeated in a double row

can be derived from a plait of _2n_ bands. Thus a pattern composed of

knot No. 1 arranged in a double row would be derived from a plait of

six cords.

Knots like Nos. 3 and 4, which are longer than they are broad, can be

placed either horizontally or vertically. Thus No. 3 placed with its

longer axis vertical can be derived from a four-cord plait, but if

placed horizontally it would be derived from a six-cord plait.

[Illustration: Method of deriving Knots Nos. 3 and 6 from a four-cord

plait]

Knot No. 2 does not occur on the Welsh crosses, and No. 1 only in a

double row, as at Neuadd Siarman, Brecknockshire. This pattern is

derived from a six-cord plait by making horizontal breaks in the two

edges of the plait, and vertical breaks in the middle, the stages being

shown on the annexed diagram.

Knot No. 3, in a single row placed with its longer axis vertical,

occurs at Llandough, Glamorganshire, and, in a single row placed the

other way, at Margam, Glamorganshire.

[Illustration: Knots Nos. 4, 5, 7, and 8, derived from a four-cord

plait]

[Illustration: Knot No. 1, derived from either a three-cord or a

six-cord plait]

[Illustration: Knots 3 and 4, derived from a six-cord plait]

[Illustration: Evolution of Knot No. 1 from a six-cord plait]

Examples of the two knots, Nos. 4 and 5, which are derived from No. 3,

are to be seen at Baglan, Glamorganshire, and Penally, Pembrokeshire.

Knot No. 6, in a single row, occurs at Llantwit Major, Glamorganshire,

and its second derivative, No. 8, at Llantwit Major, and also at Neuadd

Siarman, Brecknockshire. Its first derivative, No. 7, is only used

in a double row on the Welsh crosses, as at Silian and Maes Mynach,

Cardiganshire, and at Penally, Pembrokeshire, where the knots have an

extra spiral twist. The direction of the twist of the spirally bent

cord is the same in both the right-hand and left-hand vertical row of

knots, although the positions of the knots are different. The more

usual arrangement is to make the cords twist in opposite directions, as

on the annexed diagram, in which the evolution of the pattern is shown.

(Page 271.)

The clearest proof that the spiral knot No. 7 was developed from

plaitwork in the manner explained is that on stones at Llangenydd,

Glamorganshire; Whithorn, Wigtownshire; Abercorn, Linlithgowshire;

and Aycliffe, Co. Durham; the successive stages of development can be

easily traced.

[Illustration: Evolution of Knot No. 7 from an eight-cord plait]

[Illustration: Evolution of Knot No. 7 from an eight-cord plait]

I have coined the term _circular knotwork_ to describe a particular

class of interlaced-work, in which the circular curves made by the

cords give the pattern its distinctive appearance. The best example

of circular knotwork in any of the Hiberno-Saxon MSS. occurs on one

of the ornamental cross-pages of the Book of Durrow.[452] Circular

knotwork is not used in the decoration of the Irish ecclesiastical

metalwork, probably because it is only suitable for application to

larger surfaces than are to be found on comparatively small metal

objects. Circular knotwork is characteristic of the Irish and Scottish

sculptured monuments of the best period; it is unknown in Cornwall

and the Isle of Man and there is only one instance of its occurrence

in Wales. Very good examples of circular knotwork may be seen on

sculptured monuments in Ireland[453] at Kells, Co. Meath; Monasterboice

and Termonfechin, Co. Louth; Boho, Co. Fermanagh; Kilfenora, Co.

Clare; and Drumcliff, Co. Sligo; and in Scotland[454] at Collieburn,

Sutherland (now in the Dunrobin Museum); Tarbet (now at Invergordon

Castle), Brodie, Elginshire; Nigg, Ross-shire; Aberlemno, Monifieth

(now in the Edinburgh Museum), and Eassie, Forfarshire; and Rossie

Priory and St. Madoes, Perthshire.

[452] J. R. Allen and J. Anderson’s _Early Christian Monuments of

Scotland_, p. lxxviii.; J. A. Bruun’s _Illuminated Manuscripts of the

Middle Ages_, pt. I, “Celtic MSS.,” p. 8.

[453] H. O’Neill’s _Crosses of Ancient Ireland_.

[454] Allen and Anderson’s _Early Christian Monuments of Scotland_.

[Illustration: Evolution of Knot No.7 from an eight-cord plait]

The most common kinds of circular knotwork appear to have been evolved

in the following manner. It has already been shown how knot No. 3 can

be derived from a four-cord plait by making a series of horizontal

breaks at regular intervals, leaving two crossing-points of the cords

between each break; and how knot No. 4 can again be derived from knot

No. 3 by making a horizontal break at the point A.

[Illustration: Knot No. 3]

[Illustration: Knot No. 4]

Now if a pair of knots like No. 4 be placed opposite each other thus—

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

and repeated in a vertical row, we get the pattern shown below.

[Illustration]

[Illustration: Sections of pattern shown on p. 273]

[Illustration: Knotwork from Ramsbury, Wilts, and Nigg, Ross-shire]

By making pointed ends to the loops forming the knots and “sweetening”

the curves of the bands between each knot the appearance of the whole

is changed, and its development from the plait disguised. Almost

all geometrical ornament is capable of conveying several different

impressions to the mind according to the way it is observed by

the eye for the time being, and the intellectual pleasure which a

pattern gives is most probably dependent on the infinite variety of

these kaleidoscopic changes. Taking this pattern for example, if the

attention is concentrated upon the portions of the pattern between each

of the points where the bands cross in the centre, it will seem as if

the whole was formed of repetitions of knot No. 4; but if the attention

be now directed towards the portions lying between the middle points

of each of the knots, the pattern will appear to consist entirely of

circular curves with two diameters crossing each other diagonally.

[Illustration: ERECT CROSS-SLAB FROM COLLIEBURN, SUTHERLAND, NOW IN THE

DUNROBIN MUSEUM

_Photograph supplied by the Rev. J. M. Joass, LL.D., Honorary

Curator_]

When the circular knot thus obtained is repeated in a double row we get

a comparatively simple pattern, in which the circular curves assume

much greater prominence.

More complicated forms of circular knots can be derived from the

elementary circular knot by combining it with a circular ring, either

a larger one enclosing the four loops in the middle entirely, or a

smaller one interlaced through the loops thus:—

[Illustration]

Further variations can again be produced from these by severing the

bands in places, and joining parts of the loops to the rings on the

same principle that breaks can be made in a plait.

[Illustration]

The connection between the different knots will at once become clear if

they are drawn on separate pieces of tracing paper and placed one over

the other.

Another kind of circular knotwork is formed by enclosing the simpler

sort of knots derived directly from plaitwork within a circular band,

which crosses over in one or two places and turns inwards to form the

enclosed knots.

[Illustration: Circular knotwork from Tarbet, Ross-shire]

The illustrations of the different kinds of circular knotwork from

actual examples show the process of development.

[Illustration: Circular knotwork from Monasterboice, Co. Louth]

[Illustration: DETAIL OF ORNAMENT ON ERECT CROSS-SLAB AT NIGG,

ROSS-SHIRE

_From photographs of the cast in the Science and Art Museum, Edinburgh,

supplied by Mr. Vallance, Curator_]

By the term _triangular knotwork_ is meant interlaced patterns,

the setting-out lines of which form triangles only or triangles

and lozenges. The patterns are made by distorting the simple knots

derived from plaitwork, so as to adapt them to the triangular shape.

This species of knotwork is very seldom seen except in a few of the

Hiberno-Saxon MSS. and on some of the sculptured stones of Ireland and

Scotland. The best examples are at Kilfenora, Co. Clare; Ulbster (now

at Thurso Castle), Sutherlandshire; and Dunfallandy, Perthshire.

[Illustration: Triangular knotwork from Ulbster, Caithness]

Under the head of ringwork and chainwork are included all patterns

composed of circular, oval, and looped rings interlaced symmetrically

round a centre, or arranged so as to form a long chain. Patterns of

this kind are not found in the best Celtic work, and when they occur it

is generally an indication either of Scandinavian influence or of the

style being debased.

A certain number of modifications of the interlaced-work already

described are produced by adapting the patterns so that they will fit

into circular or annular spaces. Instances of this may be seen on the

erect cross-slabs at Hilton of Cadboll (now at Invergordon Castle) and

Nigg, Ross-shire; Glamis, Forfarshire; and Rossie Priory, Perthshire;

and on the Lough Erne and Monymusk Reliquaries.

[Illustration: Triangular knotwork from Dunfallandy, Perthshire]

STEP-PATTERNS

A step-pattern is one which is formed of straight lines bent backwards

and forwards at right angles so as to resemble a flight of steps.

The lines are often arranged symmetrically round a centre, so as

to make cruciform and swastika designs, and the different parts are

also generally shaded alternately black and white on the principle

of chequerwork. Step-patterns hardly ever occur in Christian Celtic

art except on the enamelled bosses of metalwork and in a few of the

illuminated MSS., such as the Lindisfarne Gospels, the St. Gall Gospels

(Codex No. 51), the Gospels of MacRegol, the Book of Kells, and the

Book of Durrow. The step-patterns in the MSS. so nearly resemble those

on the enamelled bosses on the Ardagh Chalice, the Tara Brooch, and

the Cross of Cong, that there can be but little doubt the illuminators

copied their designs from the enamels. In the Pagan Celtic enamels the

ornament is nearly always curvilinear; but in the Christian Celtic

enamels it is rectilinear, the arrangement of the _cloisons_ being very

similar to that on the Anglo-Saxon disc brooches incrusted with small

slabs of garnet, glass, etc. Instances have already been given in a

previous chapter of the use of step-patterns by the Pagan Celts on the

engraved woodwork from the Glastonbury Marsh Village (p. 161). The only

instances I have met with of step-patterns on the sculptured stones of

the early Christian period in this country are at Bradford-on-Avon,

Wilts; and Dysert O’Dea, Co. Clare.

KEY-PATTERNS

The term _key-pattern_ is used to describe a particular kind of

rectilinear ornament which bears a certain amount of resemblance to

the perforations in a key to allow it to pass the wards of a lock. The

best-known key-pattern is the Greek fret. This is composed of what may

be appropriately called straight-line spirals; that is to say, straight

lines (or, to speak more accurately, narrow straight bars) bent round

into a series of right angles in the same direction. The space between

the lines (or narrow bars) is generally about the same width as that of

the line itself.

[Illustration: 1 2]

[Illustration: 3 4

Key-patterns

(1) Aberlady, Haddingtonshire

(2) Abercorn, Linlithgowshire

(3) St. Andrews, Fifeshire

(4) Collieburn, Sutherlandshire

]

The key-patterns used in Christian Celtic art may be classified as

follows:—

(1) _Square key-patterns_, in which the lines run horizontally

and vertically parallel to the margins.

(2) _Diagonal key-patterns_, in which the lines run vertically

parallel to the right and left margins, and diagonally in

two directions at an angle of 45° to the margins.

(3) _Diaper key-patterns_, in which the lines run horizontally

and vertically parallel to the margins, and diagonally in

two directions at an angle of 45° to the margins.

The essential difference between the key-patterns used by the

Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans and those used by the Christian Celts

consists in the introduction of diagonal lines by the latter. Square

key-patterns (_i.e._ those of the Greek fret type) were very seldom

used in Christian Celtic art. There is, however, a very good example

on one of the crosses at Penmon, Anglesey. The first step in the

evolution of the Celtic key-pattern was to turn the Greek fret round

through an angle of 45° so as to make the lines run diagonally with

regard to the margins instead of parallel to them. Key-patterns in

this stage of development are to be seen in the Lindisfarne Gospels,

the St. Gall Gospels (Codex No. 51), and an Anglian cross-shaft from

Aberlady, Haddingtonshire, now at Carlowrie Castle, near Kirkliston,

Midlothian. It will be observed, however, that the result of changing

a square key-pattern into a diagonal one is to leave a series of

unornamented triangles all round the edge (p. 280). When these

triangles are filled in by bending the ends of the diagonal lines

round through an angle of 45°, so as to run parallel to the margins,

we get such a characteristically Celtic key-pattern as the one on the

great cross-shaft at St. Andrews, Fifeshire. Lastly, when the opposite

ends of the diagonal lines in the middle of the panel are bent round

in a similar manner, the most typical of all the Celtic key-patterns

is arrived at, of which there is a very good example on the erect

cross-slab at Farr, Sutherlandshire.

[Illustration: 1 2]

[Illustration: 3 4

Key-patterns

(1) Rosemarkie, Ross-shire

(2) Farr, Sutherlandshire

(3) Gattonside, Roxburghshire

(4) Nigg, Ross-shire

]

[Illustration: Shaft of Cross of Eiudon, at Golden Grove,

Carmarthenshire]

The filling in of the sharp corners made by the lines inclined to each

other at an angle of 45°, with small black triangles (if in a MS.)

or with sunk triangles (if on a sculptured stone) gives a decorative

finish to the pattern, and still further adds to its distinctively

Celtic character.

Next to interlaced-work the key-pattern is the most common motive

made use of in the decorative art of the Christian Celtic period.

It occurs in nearly all the Hiberno-Saxon illuminated MSS. and on a

large proportion of the sculptured monuments in Ireland, Scotland, and

Wales. Key-patterns and interlaced-work in combination, but without

any other decorative motive, may be seen on the Welsh crosses at

Carew and Nevern, Pembrokeshire; Golden Grove, Carmarthenshire; and

Llantwit Major and Margam, Glamorganshire. On the metalwork of the

period key-patterns seldom occur, except on the bronze bells, on a

strap-buckle from Islandbridge, near Dublin, and on the Crucifixion

plaque of repoussé bronze from Athlone, now in the Dublin Museum.

[Illustration: Detail of ornament on erect cross-slab at Rosemarkie,

Ross-shire]

SPIRAL ORNAMENT

[Illustration: Methods of connecting spirals]

The spiral is the only decorative motive used in Christian Celtic art

that can be proved to have been borrowed from the Pagan Celtic art

of the preceding period. Although spiral ornament appears to be so

complicated when it is completed, the geometrical process of setting

it out is simplicity itself. All that it is necessary to do is to fill

in the surface to be decorated with circles of any size, leaving about

the same distance between each; then connect the circle with =S=-

or =C=-shaped curves; and, lastly, fill in the circles with spirals

working from the tangent points, where the =S= or =C= curves touch

the circles, inwards to the centre. As the size of the circles is a

matter of no importance, a surface of irregular shape may be covered

with spiral ornament just as easily as one of symmetrical shape. In

the flamboyant ornament of the Pagan Celtic period we have the same

=S=- and =C=-shaped curves, but the circles were occupied either by a

disc of enamel (as on the bronze shield from the Thames), or by raised

conchoids (as on the gold necklet from Limavady, Co. Londonderry).

In the spiral ornament of the Christian Celtic period closely coiled

spirals like those of the bronze age were substituted for the discs of

enamel or raised conchoids. The background of the spirals, however,

retained several of the prominent features of the repoussé metalwork,

the effect of the light shining on the raised trumpet-shaped expansions

of the =S= and =C= curves being imitated in black and white or coloured

by almond-like dots. In the later and less refined spiral ornament of

the Christian period this background disappears altogether, and the

spirals are made all the same size and placed close together.

[Illustration: Tree key-pattern, Meigle, Perthshire]

As the spiral was the earliest decorative motive in Christian Celtic

art, so it was also the first to disappear, and its disappearance

marks the decadence of the style. We have in a previous chapter traced

the spiral motive from the Pagan metalwork through the enamelled

disc ornaments of the bronze bowls of the Transition period to the

illuminated MSS. of Christian times. Spiral ornament in its best form

is to be found in the following MSS.:—

The Lindisfarne Gospels A.D. 720.

The Book of Kells 8th century.

The Gospels of St. Chad ” ”

The Book of Durrow ” ”

The Book of Armagh A.D. 750-808.

The Gospels of Willibrod A.D. 739.

The Gospels of St. Gall 8th or 9th century.

The Gospels of MacRegol A.D. 820.

The Gospels of Stockholm A.D. 871.

The Vespasian A. i. Psalter 8th century.

[Illustration: Spiral ornament, with key-pattern border, from the Book

of Kells]

In metalwork spiral ornament is less common than in the MSS., there

being good examples on the Ardagh Chalice, the Tara Brooch, the

Hunterston Brooch, the Monymusk Reliquary, and the Athlone Crucifixion

Plaque.

Spiral ornament of the best kind is found on the sculptured stone

monuments only in Ireland and Scotland.[455] In Wales, Cornwall, and

the Isle of Man spiral ornament is extremely rare, and when it does

occur it is of debased character. Typical examples of spiral ornament

may be seen on the sculptured monuments in Ireland at Kells, Co. Meath;

Monasterboice, Co. Louth; Clonmacnois, King’s Co.; and Kilklispeen,

Co. Kilkenny; and in Scotland at Nigg, Shandwick, Hilton of Cadboll

(now at Invergordon Castle), all in Ross-shire; the Maiden Stone,

Aberdeenshire; St. Vigeans, Forfarshire; Meigle and Dunfallandy,

Perthshire; and Ardchattan, Argyllshire.

[455] Chiefly in the Pictish districts of the north-east of Scotland.

[Illustration: Method of connecting spirals]

Judging from the evidence afforded by the dated specimens, the best

kind of spiral ornament seems to have disappeared entirely from

Christian Celtic art after the first quarter of the tenth century.

[Illustration: FOUR MEN PLACED STRASTIKA FASHION ON RECUMBENT MONUMENT

AT MEIGLE, PERTHSHIRE

SCALE ⅛ LINEAR]

[Illustration: SPIRAL ORNAMENT ON FRAGMENT OF SCULPTURED STONE FROM

TARBET, ROSS-SHIRE; NOW IN THE EDINBURGH MUSEUM]

ZOÖMORPHIC DESIGNS

Animal forms are used in Celtic art of the Christian period in three

different ways, namely, (1) pictorially, (2) symbolically, and (3)

decoratively. As cases of the first kind of treatment we have the

hunting scenes,[456] battle scenes,[457] men driving in chariots[458]

drawn by horses, groups of animals,[459] etc., on the erect cross-slabs

of Scotland and on the bases of some of the Irish and Welsh crosses.

Although these subjects may have some symbolism behind them, yet all

the living creatures represented are treated realistically, and not

conventionally. As cases of the second kind of treatment we have the

Symbols of the Four Evangelists, which, although consisting of the

figures of a man, a lion, a bull, and an eagle, are generally highly

conventionalised. Lastly, we have the decorative use of animal forms,

where the zoölogical species of the creatures represented becomes of

so little importance that it is altogether ignored. The creatures can

certainly be divided into beasts, birds, fishes, and reptiles; but the

artist has taken such liberties with the shapes of their bodies, limbs,

heads, tails, and other details, that he would be a bold man who would

say of any one of the beasts whether it was intended for a lion, a

tiger, a dog, a wolf, or a bear. The quadruped most in favour with the

Christian Celtic artist may, as has been already suggested, have been

degraded by successive copying from the Classical lion. Anyway, it has

a head something like that of a dog, with pointed ears, an attenuated

body, four legs terminating in paws with claws, and a long tail. The

head and the paws are never misrepresented for decorative purposes, but

the body, limbs, ears, and tail may be extended to any given length

or bent in any desired direction. The beasts and other creatures are

generally shown in profile, and only rarely in plan.

[456] As on the erect cross-slab at Hilton of Cadboll (now at

Invergordon Castle), Ross-shire.

[457] As on the erect cross-slab at Aberlemno, Forfarshire.

[458] As on the base of the cross in the churchyard of Kells, Co. Meath.

[459] As on the erect cross-slabs at Shandwick, Ross-shire; and St.

Vigeans, Forfarshire; and on the base of the cross at Castledermot, Co.

Kildare.

In the simplest kind of zoömorphic ornament a single beast is used to

fill a panel, the different attitudes being as follows:—

(1) With the head looking forwards.

(2) With the head bent backwards.

(3) With the head bent backwards, biting the middle of the body.

(4) With the head bent backwards, biting the end of the tail.

(5) With the tail curled up over the back.

(6) With the tail curled up under the belly.

If the beasts are in pairs, they may be placed in the following

positions:—

(1) Symmetrically facing towards each other, or face to face.

(2) Symmetrically facing away from each other.

(3) In a horizontal row one in front of the other.

(4) In a vertical row one below the other.

When there are three or four beasts, besides being arranged in rows,

they may be placed after the fashion of the triskele or the swastika

round a centre.

Interlaced zoömorphic ornament can be made with a single beast by

extending the length of its tail and ear, and forming them into knots

at intervals, crossing over the body and limbs where necessary.

Sometimes the tail alone is knotted. In this sort of ornament the shape

of the beast is seen distinctly and the knots occupy the background. A

more complicated design can be made from a single beast by twisting its

body and limbs into knots as well as the ears and tail.

The panels of zoömorphic ornament in Christian Celtic art are, however,

usually composed of two or more beasts placed symmetrically with

regard to each other and having their bodies and limbs crossed over

and interlaced. The ears and tails may also be extended and formed

into knots in combination with the bodies and limbs. The designs thus

produced will be seen to consist apparently of two sets of bands

crossing each other diagonally, the wide bands being the bodies of the

beasts and the narrow bands, the limbs, tails, and ears. The bands are

nearly straight, or if bent at all only gently curved.

When the beasts are not placed in opposite symmetrical positions, but

in horizontal rows one in front of the other, or in vertical rows

one below the other, the bodies are often bent round spirally in one

direction or twisted into =S=-shaped spirals in two directions. A

favourite device with the Celtic artist was to make the beasts bite

their own bodies, limbs, or tails, or the body, limbs, or tail of the

beast immediately in front of it.

The zoömorphic designs composed of birds were arranged on the same

principles as those composed of beasts.

Reptiles or serpentine creatures with bodies of nearly the same width

throughout were converted into interlaced zoömorphic ornament by

twisting, plaiting, looping, or knotting the bodies together. This

class of ornament is, in fact, the ordinary interlaced patterns derived

from the plait, with heads added at one end and tails at the other.

A very ingenious zoömorphic design is made by filling in a long narrow

panel with the body of a serpentine creature undulating from side to

side. The head of the creature is at the top of the panel, and the body

remains about the same width until it reaches the bottom of the panel,

where its width is greatly reduced and its direction reversed. On its

return journey it makes a series of Stafford knots, which fill in the

spaces between the undulations of the body and the sides of the panel,

and the end of the tail is finally received into the mouth of the

reptile.[460]

There are two kinds of zoömorphic designs which are peculiar to the

MSS. of the period, namely, initial letters made in the form of a bird

or beast, and the incomplete frames round the initial pages of the

Gospels terminating in a beast’s head at one end and a fish-like tail

at the other. The only thing of a similar kind which occurs on the

sculptured monuments is the zoömorphic margin round some of the erect

cross-slabs of the east of Scotland.[461] The margin is formed by two

beasts, the heads of which appear at the top facing each other and the

tails at the bottom.

[460] Instances of this occur at Lanherne and Sancreed, Cornwall.

[461] At Cossins and Monifieth, Forfarshire; and Meigle, Dunfallandy;

and St. Madoes, Perthshire. The arched top of the frame round the

miniature of Christ seized by the Jews, in the Book of Kells, is

treated in exactly the same way as the pedimented tops of the erect

cross-slabs. In the second table of Eusebian Canons, in the Book of

Kells, the head and arms of Christ are placed between the two beasts’

heads.

Zoömorphs are found throughout the whole range of Christian Celtic art;

they form an important feature in the decoration of nearly all the

Hiberno-Saxon illuminated MSS.; they are particularly characteristic of

the Irish ecclesiastical metalwork; and they are of frequent occurrence

on the sculptured monuments of Ireland and Scotland. On the crosses

of Wales and Cornwall zoömorphs are comparatively rare. Some of the

best instances of zoömorphic designs in the MSS. are to be seen in

the cross-pages of the Book of Durrow, the Gospels of Lindisfarne,

the Book of Kells, the Gospels of St. Chad, and the St. Gall Gospels

(Codex No. 51); in metalwork on the Ardagh Chalice, the Tara Brooch,

the Hunterston Brooch, the Shrine of the Bell of St. Patrick’s Will,

the Cross of Cong, and the Shrine of St. Manchan; and on sculptured

monuments at Termonfechin, Co. Louth; Kells, Co. Meath; Tihilly,

King’s Co.; Dysert O’Dea, Co. Clare; Nigg, Ross-shire; Aberlemno

and Invergowrie, Forfarshire; St. Madoes, Perthshire; Penally,

Pembrokeshire; and Sancreed and Lanherne, Cornwall.

[Illustration: DETAIL OF ORNAMENT ON ERECT CROSS-SLAB AT NIGG,

ROSS-SHIRE]

Sometimes key-patterns and spirals are converted into zoömorphic

designs by the addition of animals’ heads, as at Penmon, Anglesey;

and Termonfechin, Co. Louth. The centres of spirals are also often

made zoömorphic, as in the Gospels of Lindisfarne, on the cross at

Kilklispeen, Co. Kilkenny, and on an erect cross-slab at St. Vigeans,

Forfarshire.

Probably the most wonderful _tour de force_ in the way of zoömorphic

sculpture is a pair of panels on the erect cross-slab at Nigg,

Ross-shire. Each panel is ornamented with a series of raised bosses

arranged symmetrically. The whole of the convex surfaces of the bosses

is covered with intricate knotwork, and the background is composed

of serpents, the tails of which coil spirally round the bases of the

bosses, and in each case enter the circumference at three points to

form the interlaced-work on the boss. After innumerable crossings under

and over, the tails again diverge at three other points round the base

of the boss, and finally terminate in small spirals in different parts

of the background.

ANTHROPOMORPHIC DESIGNS

Under the above heading are classed all designs in which the complete

figure of a man, or portions of a man are used for purposes of

decoration. Human heads occur in metalwork in the decoration of the

Tara Brooch[462] and in sculptured stonework on the cross of Muiredach,

at Monasterboice, Co. Louth, and on a cross-head from the crannog at

Drumgay Loch.

[462] A pin-brooch ornamented with a human head, from Woodford River,

Co. Cavan, is illustrated in Sir W. Wilde’s _Catal. of the Mus.

R.I.A._, p. 565.

The most remarkable instances of the decorative use of the complete

figures of men in the illuminated MSS. are to be found in the Book of

Kells. The figures are generally arranged in pairs facing each other,

in groups of three triskele fashion, and in nearly all cases the

attitudes are extremely uncomfortable with the knees drawn up close

against the stomach. The limbs of the different figures are crossed

over and interlaced, as in zoömorphic ornament, and the hands are shown

grasping either the limbs, hair, or beard of one of the other figures.

Sometimes the human figures are combined with figures of birds or

beasts.

We have already referred to the incomplete frames of the initial pages

of the Gospels with zoömorphic terminations. In the

___

“Nativitas XPI”

initial page in the Book of Kells the incomplete frame terminates in a

human head at one end and two legs at the other. Another initial page

in the same MS.—that of St. Mark’s Gospel—has a zoömorphic frame, but

the beast’s head is holding a man between its jaws, whilst the man is

tugging at the beast’s tongue with his hand.

Groups of four human figures arranged swastika fashion, interlaced

and each grasping the limbs, wrists, hair, or beard of one of the

other figures, occur on crosses in Ireland at Kilkispeen, Co. Kilkenny;

Monasterboice, Co. Louth; and Kells, Co. Meath; and in Scotland on a

recumbent monument at Meigle, Perthshire. A human figure interlaced

with a bird occurs in two instances on sculptured stones in Scotland,

namely, at Monifieth, Forfarshire (now in the Edinburgh Museum of

Antiquities); and at Meigle, Perthshire.

FOLIAGE

Leaf and plant motive decoration is entirely foreign to the spirit of

purely Celtic Christian art, and whenever it occurs it is generally

to be traced to Northumbrian influence. The Book of Kells and the

Stockholm Gospels are the only Hiberno-Saxon illuminated MSS. in which

any trace of foliage can be detected. There are panels of foliage on

the Irish crosses at Kells, Co. Meath; Monasterboice, Co. Louth; and

Clonmacnois, King’s Co. In Wales there is an instance of foliage on

the crosses at Penally, Pembrokeshire. In Scotland the only sculptured

monuments with foliage upon them (excluding, of course, those in the

Northumbrian districts of the south) are the erect cross-slabs at

Hilton of Cadboll and Tarbet, Ross-shire (both now at Invergordon

Castle); St. Vigeans, Forfarshire; and Crieff, Perthshire; on crosses

at Camuston, Forfarshire; Dupplin, Perthshire; and on a cross-shaft at

St. Andrews, Fifeshire.

The foliage may in all cases be traced back to the Classical vine, the

well-known symbol of Christ. It is often much degraded by successive

copying, and although the forms of the leaves are often altered beyond

recognition the bunches of grapes can always be made out.

SYMBOLICAL FIGURE-SUBJECTS

We have already mentioned most of the figure-subjects to be found in

the Hiberno-Saxon illuminated MSS., and on the Irish ecclesiastical

metalwork. It remains therefore only now to take the sculptured

monuments into consideration.

It was in Ireland alone that a recognised cycle of scriptural figure

subjects was adopted for the decoration of the crosses and that in

nearly all cases the ornament was relegated to a subordinate position.

In Scotland and Wales, on the contrary, Scripture scenes are seldom

represented on the sculptured monuments; in Cornwall the only figure

subject which occurs on the crosses is the Crucifixion; and in the

Isle of Man the figure-subjects are mostly taken from the Pagan Norse

mythology.

The following table shows the Scriptural subjects on the sculptured

monuments of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and Cornwall, and the frequency

with which they occur:—

------------------------------+--------+---------+------+---------

|Ireland.|Scotland.|Wales.|Cornwall.

------------------------------+--------+---------+------+---------

_Old Testament_— | | | |

Adam and Eve | 15 | 2 | — | —

Noah in the Ark | 2 | 1 | — | —

Sacrifice of Isaac | 9 | 1 | — | —

Three Children in Furnace | 4 | — | — | —

Daniel in Den of Lions | 8 | 9 | — | —

David and Harp | 6 | 2 | — | —

David and Lion | 6 | 2 | — | —

David and Goliath | 3 | — | — | —

Jonah and Whale | — | 3 | — | —

Ascent of Elijah | — | 1 | — | —

------------------------------+--------+---------+------+---------

_New Testament_— | | | |

Virgin and Child | — | 5 | — | —

Adoration of Magi | 2 | 1 | — | —

Flight into Egypt | 1 | — | — | —

Baptism of Christ | 2 | — | — | —

Miracle of Loaves and Fishes| 4 | 1 | — | —

Raising of Lazarus | — | 1 | — | —

Crucifixion | 16 | 5 | 3 | 40

Christ in Glory | 5 | 1 | — | —

Last Judgment | 1 | — | — | —

Annunciation | — | — | 1 | —

Christ seized by the Jews | 2 | — | 1 | —

Twelve Apostles | 1 | — | — | —

Agnus Dei | 2 | — | — | —

Dextera Dei | 2 | — | — | —

------------------------------+--------+---------+------+---------

In addition to the above there are the following, which are sacred or

ecclesiastical, but not, strictly speaking, Scriptural:—

-----------------------------+--------+---------+------+---------

|Ireland.|Scotland.|Wales.|Cornwall.

-----------------------------+--------+---------+------+---------

Symbols of Four Evangelists | — | 4 | — | —

Cherubim | — | — | 1 | —

Angels | — | 22 | — | —

Saints | — | — | — | —

Oranti | — | 1 | 3 | —

-----------------------------+--------+---------+------+---------

It appears, then, that the Scriptural subjects of most frequent

occurrence in Ireland are the Crucifixion, Adam and Eve, the Sacrifice

of Isaac, Daniel in the Lions’ Den, and the scenes from the Life of

David; and in Scotland, the Crucifixion, Daniel in the Lions’ Den, the

Virgin and Child, and the symbols of the four Evangelists.

The subjects common to both Ireland and Scotland are Adam and Eve, Noah

(?), Sacrifice of Isaac, Daniel in the Lions’ Den, David and the Harp,

David and the Lion, Adoration of the Magi, Flight into Egypt, Miracle

of Loaves and Fishes, Crucifixion, Christ in Glory, Agnus Dei, Angels.

The subjects which occur in Ireland, but not in Scotland, are the

Three Children in the Furnace, David and Goliath, Baptism of Christ,

Resurrection, Last Judgment, Dextera Dei, Twelve Apostles. And those

which occur in Scotland, but not in Ireland, are Ascent of Elijah,

Raising of Lazarus, Jonah and the Whale, Annunciation, Salutation,

Miracle of Healing the Blind, Christ and Mary Magdalene, Lazarus.

Of the subjects on the early sculptured stones of Ireland and Scotland

the following belong to the cycle of subjects found on the paintings in

the Catacombs and the Sculptured Sarcophagi (A.D. 50 to 450):—

Adam and Eve. Daniel in the Lions’ Den.

Noah. Jonah and the Whale.

Sacrifice of Isaac. Adoration of Magi.

Three Children in the Furnace. Adoration of Magi.

Ascent of Elijah. Miracle of Healing the Blind.

The following subjects belong to the Lombardo-Byzantine period (A.D.

700-1100):—

David. Christ in Glory.

Baptism of Christ. Last Judgment.

Crucifixion. Agnus Dei.

Resurrection. Dextera Dei.

Flight into Egypt. Twelve Apostles.

Virgin and Child (apart from Magi). Symbols of the Four Evangelists.

Christ and Mary Magdalene. Angels.

Thus the early Sculptured Stones and the Hiberno-Saxon MSS. of Great

Britain, and the Carlovingian Ivories afford a connecting link between

the older symbolism of the primitive Christianity of the Catacomb

period and the more strictly ecclesiastical art of mediæval times.

Quite apart from the fact that King David was a type of Christ, and

that his pictures formed the illustrations of the Psalter, it is not

surprising that he should have been an object of popular worship

amongst the warlike and musical Celts, to one side of whose character

his heroic deeds in rending the jaws of the lion and slaying the giant

Goliath, would appeal as strongly as his talent as a harper would to

the other.

A small MS. Irish Psalter in the British Museum (Vit. F. i.)[463]

contains two very curious miniatures, one of David Playing the Harp and

the other of David and Goliath.[464] The former is interesting, because

I think it helps to explain the meaning of a figure sitting on the back

of a beast and playing a harp,[465] sculptured on one of the panels of

the cross at Clonmacnoise. As I hold, this is intended for David; and

my reason for supposing this is, because the throne on which David is

seated in the miniature in the Psalter is conventionally treated as a

beast.

[463] Westwood’s _Miniatures_, pl. 5.

[464] In the miniature of David and Goliath in the Psalter David

holds a sling in one hand and a beast-headed club in the other. The

resemblance between this club and the beast’s-head symbol, which occurs

on the Norrie’s Law silver ornaments and on several of the early

incised slabs in Scotland, may be only accidental, but it is worth

noting as a possible clue to the scriptural interpretation of the

symbol.

[465] O’Neil, pl. 24A.

I am not quite sure whether the boat with men in it, on the stone at

Cossins, is intended for Noah’s Ark or not, but a boat of just the same

kind is represented on a carved wooden pillar at Olaf’s Church,[466]

Nesland, where it is associated with other Scriptural subjects, amongst

others the creation of Eve, Samson and Delilah, and David and Goliath.

In this case there can be little doubt but that the boat is intended

for Noah’s Ark, so that probably the boat at Cossins has the same

meaning.

The angels are cherubim, with four wings, and spirals where the wings

join on to the body, representations of which are to be seen on the

stones at Eassie, Glamis, and elsewhere in Scotland. They do not occur

on any of the sculptured crosses in Ireland; but there are instances

of angels or the symbols of the four evangelists treated in the same

fashion in the St. Gall Gospels, Codex No. 51,[467] and on the Book

Shrine of St. Molaise’s Gospels,[468] in the Museum of the Royal Irish

Academy in Dublin, and also on a bronze plaque[469] of the Crucifixion,

in the same collection. I have recently discovered a very curious

instance of an angel of this kind, with three wings on a cross-slab,

with interlaced-work, in St. David’s Cathedral, given in Westwood’s

_Lapidarium Walliæ_ (pl. 63, fig. 4), but the wings and spirals only

shown, and the head of the angel omitted.

[466] L. H. S. Dietrichsen, _De Norske Stavkirker_, p. 362.

[467] C. Purton Cooper’s “Appendix A to Report on Rymer’s Fœdera,” pl.

5.

[468] _Archæologia_, vol. xliii., p. 131.

[469] Westwood’s _Miniatures_, pl. 51.

The pair of ecclesiastics, sometimes standing, sometimes enthroned,

sometimes kneeling, with a bird holding a circular disc in its mouth

between them, is a subject common to the early sculptured stones of

both Scotland[470] and Ireland,[471] but the exact meaning of it

has yet to be ascertained if we are not to take the instance on the

Ruthwell cross as an authoritative explanation of the whole.

[470] As at Nigg and St. Vigeans. Dr. J. Anderson regards the Nigg

example as being intended for St. Paul and St. Anthony.

[471] As at Kells, Moone Abbey, Clonca.

As I have already pointed out in my Rhind Lectures on _Christian

Symbolism_, there is a nearer affinity between the subjects chosen to

decorate the bases of the Irish crosses and the representations of

hunting scenes, horsemen, chariots, etc., on the upright cross-slabs of

the north-east of Scotland, than the more strictly Scriptural scenes on

the shafts of the Irish crosses. The best examples illustrating this

are to be seen on the bases of the crosses at Kells (Figs. 5 and 6),

Monasterboice, Clonmacnois, Castle Dermot (Fig. 7), and Kilklispeen.

The chariot on the Meigle slab, now lost, may be compared with the

chariots to be seen on the shaft of the cross at Killamery, and on

the bases of the crosses at Monasterboice, Kilklispeen, and in Kells

churchyard; on the base of the cross in the street at Kells we have the

eagle and fish, as on the “Drosten” stone at St. Vigeans,[472] and as

in the Book of Armagh; and on the base of this same cross, and on the

cross of Muredach at Monasterboice, centaurs occur, in some respects

like those on the slabs at Aberlemno, Meigle, and Glamis.

[472] Another remarkable instance of the eagle and fish has recently

been found on a stone with an Ogam inscription, at Latheron, near

Keiss, Caithness.

On the base of the Kilklispeen cross is portrayed a procession of

ecclesiastics taking part in a most remarkable ceremony. On the south

side of the base is to be seem a priest carrying a processional cross,

and followed by a man leading a horse, on the back of which is laid

the headless trunk of a man, with two birds of prey, or carrion crows,

perched on the top.

On the north side of the base are two ecclesiastics on horseback,

followed by two more in a chariot drawn by a pair of horses.

On the east side are several beasts, birds, and a man.

On the west side is a central figure, perhaps a bishop, with three

ecclesiastics holding croziers on each side of him.

These scenes can hardly be Scriptural; and if they are not taken from

the life of some saint, it is difficult to see what explanation remains

to be suggested, except that an event of local importance is here

commemorated. The bases of the pillar-cross at Llandough and of the

great wheel-cross at Margam, both in Glamorganshire, are the only ones

with figures of horsemen upon them in Wales.

The symbolism of the shafts of the Irish crosses is so strictly

biblical that secular subjects may have been placed on the bases by

way of contrast, to indicate the actual world or earth on which the

cross stood representing the spiritual world. The eagle and fish may

personify the ocean, and the centaur the desert, for which we have the

authority of the bestiaries and the legendary life of St. Anthony.

The points of similarity between the ornamental patterns on the stones

of Ireland and Scotland raise questions of too much intricacy to be

dealt with here; but it may be remarked that figure-sculpture forms

the chief feature of the Irish crosses—geometrical, zoömorphic, and

foliageous designs being only as a rule applied to the decoration

of the smaller panels on the sides of the shafts and to the rings

connecting the arms. The upright cross-slabs of Scotland, more

particularly those in Ross-shire, approach much more nearly in

style—and therefore probably in age—to the illuminated pages of the

Hiberno-Saxon MSS. of the best period, than do any of the Irish crosses.

In conclusion, I consider the so-called Celtic style to be a

local variety of the Lombardo-Byzantine style, from which the

figure-subjects, the interlaced-work, the scrolls of foliage, and many

of the strange real and fabulous creatures were apparently borrowed.

The Lombardo-Byzantine style was introduced into this country after

the Saxons had become Christians; and being grafted upon the Pagan

art of the Late-Celtic period, was developed in different ways in

different parts of Great Britain. However, it in no way detracts from

the artistic capacity of the Celt that he should have adapted certain

decorative motives belonging to a foreign style instead of evolving

them out of his own inner consciousness. Although his materials may

not all have been of native origin, they were so skilfully made use of

in combination with native designs, and developed with such exquisite

taste, that the result was to produce an entirely original style, the

like of which the world had never seen before.

INDEX

Abercorn, cross-shaft, 269

Abergele, horse-trappings, 95

Aberlemno, erect cross-slab, 184

Abernethy, 82

Abingdon, pottery, 124

Aboyne, armlet, 113

— erect cross-slab, 184

Achnabreac, spirals at, 50

Ægean, spiral ornament in the, 54

Æsica, 82

— fibula, 152

Alfriston, horse-trappings, 94

— enamelled harness-ring, 134

Algeria, penannular brooch, 225

Allington, pottery, 124

Alstonfield, Iron Age burial at, 68

Amber settings, 237

Amerden, sword-sheath, 91

Ammendola, sarcophagus of, 6

Andrews, St., sarcophagus, 193

Angels, 300

Animals, figures of, 146

Antennæ, swords with, 86

Anthony, St., 302

Anthropomorphic designs, Late-Celtic, 144

Anthropomorphs in Celtic Christian art, 294

Apollinare in Classe, Sant’, Ravenna, 244

Archdall, Castle, spirals at, 51

Ardagh, chalice, 216, 235

Ardakillen Crannog, 81

— — fibula, 170

Ardchattan, erect cross-slab, 184

Ardoch, 82

— horse-trappings, 95

Aristotle, 2

Armagh, bell, 199

— Book of, 175

— shrine of Book of, 208

Armlets, enamelled, 134

— Late-Celtic, 113

— of glass, Late-Celtic, 141

Arria and Paetus, 5

Arras, armlet, 114

— horse-trappings, 94

— Iron Age burials at, 63

— mirror, 115

Aryans, 1

Aspatria, sculptured cist, 55

Assynt, jet necklace from, 42

Aston Clinton, pottery, 124

Athenry, dagger-sheath, 92

Athlone, Crucifixion, 218

Auchendolly, horse-trappings, 95

Auchenbadie, armlet, 113

Avebury, fibula, 106

Axe-head of bronze with spirals, 52

— sculptures, 55

Aycliffe, cross-shaft, 269

Aylesford, bucket, 116, 145

— fibula, 106

— Iron Age cemetery at, 70

— pottery, 122

— tankard, 116

Ayton Moor, cup-marks at, 57

Backworth, pair of fibulæ, 103

— saucepan, 117

Badony, Lower, bell, 198

Baglan, cross-slab, 182

Bakerhill, sculptured cist, 55

Balcalk, jet necklace from, 42

Ballinderry Crannog, 81

— — comb, 128

Balmaclellan, Late-Celtic finds at, 77

— mirror, 115

Balls, stone, of Bronze Age, 50

Ballycostello, horse-trappings, 95

Ballynaminton, horse-trappings, 95

Bandaging patterns, 38

Bangor, bell, 201

Bapchild, horse-trappings, 94

Bargany house, sword-sheath, 91

Barlaston, bowl, 58, 166

Barlaston, Iron Age burial at, 68

Barrington, enamelled bowl, 135

Barrochan, cross, 192

Bartlow Hills, enamelled vessel, 138

Basketry, Late-Celtic, 143

Battersea, shield, 92

— sword-sheath, 91

Beaded torques, 159

Beads, Late-Celtic, 125, 141

Belhelvie, armlet, 113

Bells, Celtic, 194

Bell-shrines, 204

Benty Grange, enamelled bowl, 134

— Iron Age burial at, 67

Berkshire, triskele pendant, 121

Bernaldby Moor, sculptured cist, 55

Berru, helmet from, 12

Beverley, Iron Age burials at, 65

Bibracte, enamels from, 138

Bigbury Camp, 82

Birdlip, bowl, 116

— fibula, 106

— Iron Age burials at, 69

— mirror, 115

Birnie, bell, 198

Birrenswark, 82

Birrenswark, horse-trappings, 95

Biskra, penannular brooch, 225

Black Hedon, cup-marks at, 57

Blackshaw, spirals at, 50

Blathmac, crozier, 208

Boars’ tusks from Arras, 64

Bones, engraved, 150

Bonework, Late-Celtic, 127

Bonville, fibula, 106

Book-shrines, 208

Bowl, Barlaston, 166

— Chesterton, 167

— enamelled, Möklebust, 160

Bowls, Late-Celtic, 116

— with enamelled handles, 134

Boxmoor, sword-sheath, 91

Braddan, Kirk, wheel-cross, 188

Braintree, pottery, 124

Braughing, enamelled vessel, 137

Brazing, 132

Breac Moedoc, 211

Breaks in plait, 259

Bride, Kirk, cross, 186

Bridle-bit, enamelled, Rise, 133

— — Birrenswark, 133

Brighton, pottery, 125

Brodie, erect cross-slab, 184

Broighter, Limavady, find of gold ornaments, 109

Brooch, penannular, 223

Bronze Age burials, 23

— — Celtic art in, 22

— — Celts, 15

— — chronology of, 19

— — patterns which survived into the Iron Age, 60

Brough, 82

Brough, fibula, 107, 154

Brythons, 17

Buckets, 145

— Late-Celtic, 116

Burghead, 82

Burials of Iron Age, 65

Bunrannoch, armlet, 113

Byzantine art, 239, 244

Caburn, Mount, Late-Celtic oppidum at, 74

Caistor, enamelled bowl, 135

Calderstones, spirals at, 50

Camborne, cross-slab, 182

Came Down, cup-marks at, 57

Camerot Muir, spirals at, 50

Canterbury, châtelaine, 115

— horse-trappings, 94

Capel Garmon, fire-dogs, 118, 141

Cappagh, bell, 199

Carew, cross, 193

Carham, sword-sheath, 91

Carlingwark Loch, tankard, 116

Carlswark Cavern, armlet, 114

Carlton, inlaid object, 139

Carnbân, sculptured cist, 55

Carn Brê, 16

Carnwath, sculptured cist, 55

Cashel, bell, 201

Castell Nadolig, 82

Casting metal, Iron Age, 130

Castle Dermot, 192

Castle Newe, armlet, 113

— — weem at, 82

— — enamelled armlets, 134

Castlethorpe, armlet, 114

Catterdale, sword-sheath, 91

Cauldrons of bronze, 86

Caves inhabited by Brit-Welsh, 75, 81

Celtæ, 4

Celtic Tribes in Britain, 17

Celt in classical sculpture, 5

Celts of bronze, 41

Centaur, 302

Certosa situlæ, 145

Chad, St., Book of, 175

Chains, 237

— of gold and silver, Late-Celtic, 139

Chalices, Celtic, 215

Chalk drums from Folkton, 56

Champlevé enamel, 136

Characteristics of Celtic Christian style, 254

— Late-Celtic style, 143

Chariots, 301

— wheels, 98

— wheels from Arras, 64

Châtelaines, Late-Celtic, 115

Chedworth, Chi-Rho Monogram, 162

Chequerwork, Late-Celtic, 160

Cherubim, 300

Chesterford, Great, Kimmeridge shale vessel, 128

Chesters, Great, fibula, 107

Chesterton, bowl, 167

— enamelled bowl, 135

Chevron patterns, 28

— — Late-Celtic, 160

Chi-Rho Monogram, 163

Chorley, chains, 140

— pair of fibulæ, 102

Christianity in Britain, 162

Chronology of Bronze Age, 19

Circles, concentric, in Bronze Age, 55

Circular knotwork, 273

Cirencester, fibula, 107

Cists of Bronze Age with sculpture, 55

Cividale, Baptistery of Calistus, 258

Claughton Moor, cup-marks at, 57

Clemente, San, Rome, 244, 258

Clogher, fibula, 105

— bell, 199

Cloisonné enamel, 136

Clonmacnois, 190

— cross-slabs, 180

— crozier, 207

— gold collar, 111

— pin, chains, 140

— pin, 219

Clooncunra, horse-trappings, 95

Clova, horse-trappings, 95

Clyde Crannog, comb, 128

Coins, ancient British, 77

— with Late-Celtic finds, 88

Cookham, dagger-sheath, 92

Colchester, Kimmeridge shale vessel, 128

Commios, coins of, 78

Corfe Castle, Kimmeridge shale vessel, 128

Cowlam, fibula, 106

Cochno, wheel-symbol at, 59

Coffey, George, theory on spiral ornament, 53

Coffins, stone, 193

Coilsfield, spirals at, 50

— sculptured cist, 55

Coinage, Celtic, 14

Collar, Late-Celtic, 153

Collars, Late-Celtic, 109

Colours used by celtic scribes, 233

Columba’s Psalter, shrine of, 209

Compass-work in Late-Celtic art, 150

Cong, cross, 213

Coped stones, 182

Copenhagen, reliquary, 211

Coral settings, 237

Cossins, erect cross-slab, 184

Courcelles-et-Montagne, 13

Cowlam, armlet, 114

— Iron Age burials at, 65

Craigie Wood, sculptured cist, 55

Craigywarren, pin, 10

Crannogs, 81

Craven Arms, châtelaine, 115

Crawfordjohn, silver chains, 170

Cremation in Bronze Age, 23

Crichie, horse-trappings, 95

Cricklade, fibula, 106

Crosby Ravensworth, spoons, 120

Cross, Celtic, evolution of, 186

— processional, 213

Cross-slabs, 181

Crossthwaite, enamelled bowl, 134

Croy, penannular brooch, 228

Croziers, Celtic, 206

Cruciform breaks in plait, 262

— patterns, 236

Crucifixion plaques, 218

Crystal settings, 237

Cuerdale, penannular brooch, 227

Culan, St., bell-shrine, 204

Culbin sands, armlet, 113

Cumdachs, 208

Cup-and-ring sculpture at Ilkley, 59

— — Wooler, 59

— — Kirkcudbright, 59

— — Lochgilphead, 59

— — Kilmartin, 59

Cup-marked stones, 57

Danes’ Graves, horse-trappings, 94

— — Iron age burials, 65

— — pin, 107

Dartmoor, 16

Datchet, fibula, 106, 139

Dates of Late-Celtic finds, 85

Decorative motives in Bronze Age, 23

Delphi sacked by the Gauls, 4

Denmark, spiral ornament in, 51

Deepdale cave, 76, 81

— looped wire armlets, 139

Diagonal lines, use of, 60

— setting-out lines, 255

Dimma’s Book, shrine of, 209

Discs of repoussé bronze, late-Celtic, 121

Dogmael’s, St., 18

Dogs, fire-, 141

— — Late-Celtic, 118

Dorchester, sword-sheath, 91

Dornoch Links, cup-marks at, 57

Dots, rows of, in decoration, 39

— use of, 60

Dowalton Crannog, 81

— horse-trappings, 95

Dowkerbottom Cave, fibula, 107

Dowth, spirals at, 50

Drinking-cup urns, 25

Drumcliff, cross, 192

Drumragh, bell, 199

Dunfallandy, erect cross-slab, 184, 277

Dunkeld, Little, bell, 198

Dupplin, cross, 192

Durrow, cross, 192

— Book of, 169, 174

— shrine of Book of, 208

Dyce, erect cross-slab, 184

Dysert, crozier, 208

Eagle and fish, 301

Ecclesiastics, 301

Eday, spirals at, 50

Egypt, spiral ornament in, 54

Eilean Finan, bell, 198

Eliseg’s Pillar, Valle Crucis, 193

Elkstone, cup-marks at, 57

Elveden, pottery, 124

— tankard, 116

Embleton, sword-sheath, 91

Embsay, collar, 111

Emlagh, horse-trappings, 95

Enamelling, Iron Age, 133

— process of, 135

Enamels of Christian Celtic period, 235

Engraved patterns, Iron Age, 132

Eppillos, coins of, 78

Essex, pottery, 122

Evolution of Celtic cross, 186

Farley heath, 82

— fibula, 107

Farnell, cross-slab, 184

Farr, erect cross-slab, 184

Fens, the, horse-trappings, 94

Fibula, evolution of, 99

— from Æsica, 152

Fibulæ, enamelled, 134

— disc-shaped, 154

— worn in pairs with chain, 104

Figure drawing in Celtic Christian art, 256

Figure-subjects in Celtic Christian art, 296

Filigree-work, 237

Finds, Late-Celtic, dates of, 85

— — geographical distribution of, 79

— — with coins, 88

— of Iron Age, nature of, 61

Fire-dogs, 141

— Late-Celtic, 118

Firth, spirals at, 50

Flamboyant ornament, Late-Celtic, 150

Flasby, sword-sheath, 91

Flutes, Late-Celtic, 118

Foliage in Celtic Christian art, 247, 294

— in Late-Celtic art, 148

Folkton, chalk drums from, 56

Food-vessel urns, 25

Ford West Field, sculptured cist, 55

Forres, erect cross-slab, 184

Forteviot, bell, 198

Frampton, Chi-Rho Monogram, 163

Galati, 4

Gall, St., Gospels of, 177

Galli, 4

Garton, bell, 198

Gaulcross, pin, 108

Gauls, Cisalpine, 13

Geographical distribution of Late-Celtic finds, 79

Ghegan Rock, comb, 128

Giacomo, San, Venice, 245

Gilton, mirror, 115

Giorgio, San, di Valpolicella, 244, 258

Gladiator, the Dying, 5

Glamis, erect cross-slab, 184

Glass, Late-Celtic, 125, 141

— settings, 237

Glastonbury Lake-Dwellings, 72, 81

— Lake Village, pottery, 142

— — — woodwork, 147, 161

— Marsh Village, pottery, 125

— — — woodwork, 126

— — — bowl, 117

Glencolumbkille, spirals at, 51

Glencotho, sword-sheath, 91

Glenfahan, Ogam stone, 165

Gobnet, St., stone of, 165

Goidelic Celts, 15

Goidels, 17

Golden Grove, cross, 261

— — cross-shaft, 282

Golspie, erect cross-slab, 184

Gorge-Meillet, helmet from, 12

Gospels, 173

Goulien, bell, 199

Gourdon, chalice, 215

Govan, sarcophagus, 193

Grækwyl, 13

Grange of Conan, weem at, 82

— — armlet, 113

Greenloan, cup-marks at, 57

Greenwich, enamelled bowl, 135

Grimspound, 16

Grimthorpe, Iron Age burial at, 65

— sword-sheath, 91

Guthrie Castle, bell-shrine, 204

Hagbourne Hill, horse-trappings, 95

— — Late-Celtic finds at, 76

Hällristningar, 60

Hallstatt, cemetery of, 7

— situlæ, 145

— type, objects of, found in Great Britain, 86

Hambledown Hill, 82

Ham hill, 82

Hamdon Hill, horse-trappings, 95

— — Late-Celtic finds at, 76

Hammer-headed pins, 108

Hammersmith, fibula, 106

Hand-grasping figures, 294

Harness-mountings, 98

— enamelled, 134

Harness-rings, enamelled, 134

— Late-Celtic, 96

Harray, broch of, 82

Haughton-le-Skerne, sword-sheath, 91

Hay Hill, fire-dogs, 118

Head ornaments for horses, 98

Hecatæus, 2

Helen’s, St., Chi-Rho Monogram, 163

Helmet from Berru, 12

— from Gorge-Meillet, 12

Helmets, Late-Celtic, 93

Henshole, horse-trappings, 95

Herodotus, 2

Hexagon patterns, 36

High Crosses, 188

Highfield Pits, pottery, 125

Hilton of Cadboll, erect cross-slab, 184

Hinksey, N., dagger-sheath, 92

Hitchin, pottery, 124

Hod Hill, 82

— — fibula, 106

— — sword-sheath, 91

Hollows Tower, spirals at, 50

Hook-and-disc ornaments, Late-Celtic, 121

Horns with terminal knobs, 148

Horse’s head ornaments, 98

Horse-trappings from Arras, 64

— Late-Celtic, 94

Hounslow, figures of animals, 146

Hunsbury, fibula, 106

— Late-Celtic oppidum at, 73

— pottery, 125

— sword-sheath, 132

— sword-sheath, 91, 97

— triskele pendant, 121

Hunterston, brooch, 231

Hyndford Crannog, 81

— — collar, 112

Iberians, 15

Icklingham, sword-sheath, 91

Ilkley, cup-and-ring sculpture, 59

— rock-sculptures at, 57

Incense-cup urns, 25

Inchbrayock, erect cross-slab, 184

Ingoe, cup-marks at, 57

Inhumation in Bronze Age, 23

Inishkeel, bell, 203

Ink used by Celtic scribes, 232

Insh, bell, 198

Interlaced-work, 246

— evolution of, 257

Invergowrie, erect cross-slab, 184

Iona, cross, 192

Ireland, spoons, 121

Italo-Greek objects found at Aylesford, 71

Iron Age finds, 61

Jet necklaces, 42

Jezerine, chains, 140

Just, St., Chi-Rho Monogram, 163

Kells, Book of, 174

Kells, cross, 192, 224, 233

— crozier, 207

— shrine of Book of, 208

Kelko cave, 76, 81

Kent’s Cavern, 76, 81

— — pottery, 125

Keshkerrigan, bowl, 117

Keston, 16

Kettleburn, broch of, 82

Key-patterns, 278

Kilbroney, bell, 198

Kilburn, cup-marks at, 57

Kildalton, cross, 192

Kildare, Co., penannular brooch, 228

Kilfenora, cross, 192

Kilkeeran, horse-trappings, 95

Kilklispeen, cross, 192

Killarney, crozier, 207

— gold lunula from, 40

Killeen Cormac, Ogam stone, 165

Killing Hill, spirals at, 51

Kilmainham, bell, 198

Kilmartin, cup-and-ring sculpture, 59

— sculptured cist, 55

Kilmichael Glassary, bell-shrine, 204

Kilnsea, fibula, 107

Kimmeridge shale objects, Late-Celtic, 128

Kingsholm, pottery, 125

Kingsholm, triskele pendant, 121

King’s Mountain, spirals at, 50

Kingston Down, enamelled bowl, 135

Kirkby Thore, fibula, 107

Kirkcudbright, cup-and-ring sculpture, 59

Kirkhead Cave, 75, 81

Kirkly Thore, 82

Kirkmadrine, Chi-Rho Monogram, 163

Kirk Whelpington, cup-marks at, 57

Kirriemuir, horse-trappings, 95

Kit’s Coty House, pottery, 124

Knobs on horns of beasts, 148

Knockmany, spirals at, 51

Knot, spiral, 270

Knots used in Celtic art, 265

Knotwork, circular, 273

— triangular, 276

Lactin’s, St., arm, shrine of, 210

Lagore crannog, 81

— — beads, 125

— — comb, 128

— pin, 108

Lake-dwellings, 81

Lake-dwellings at Glastonbury, 72

Lanivet, coped stone, 182

Lashing patterns, 38

Late-Celtic finds, dates of, 85

— — geographical distribution of, 79

— — with coins, 88

— style, 143

La Tène, oppidum of, 9

Latheron, eagle and fish, 301

Lattice-work patterns, 34

Leatherwork, 237

Leicester, horse-trappings, 94

Lilburn Hill, spirals at, 50

Limavady, gold chains, 139

Limavady, gold collar, 109, 153

Lincoln, sword-sheath, 91

Lindisfarne Book, 177

Linlithgowshire, enamelled patera, 137

Lismore, crozier, 207

Lisnacroghera Crannog, 81

— — sword-sheath, 148

— sword-sheath, 91

Llanbadarn Fawr, cross, 193

Llanbedr, spirals at, 50

Llanfair, spoons, 121

Llandough, cross, 193

Llandyssyl, collar, 111

Llangenydd, cross-shaft, 270

Llangystenyn, bell, 198

Llangwynodl, bell, 200

Llanrhyddlad, bell, 198

Llantwit Major, cross, 186, 261

Lochar Moss, bowl, 116

— — collar, 111

Lochgilphead, cup-and-ring sculpture, 59

Lochlee Crannog, 81

— — woodwork, 127

— horse-trappings, 95

Lonan, Kirk, wheel-cross, 188

London, enamelled harness-ring, 134

— fibula, 106

— horse-trappings, 94

— spoons, 120

— sword-sheath, 91

Looped wirework, 139

Lorrha, bell, 201

Loughcrew, spirals at, 50

Lough Erne, reliquary, 210

Lough Lene Castle, bell, 201

Loughnashade, trumpet, 118

Lough Ravel Crannog, beads, 125

Lozenge patterns, 32

— — Late-Celtic, 160

Lullingstone, enamelled bowl, 135

Lunulæ, gold, 41

Lumphanan, stone ball from, 50

MacDurnan, Gospels, 175

MacRegol, Gospels of, 175

Madoes, St., erect cross-slab, 183

Maen Achyfan, cross, 193

Maes Mynach, cross-shaft, 270

Magny Lambert, 12

Maiden Castle, 82

Maiden Stone, erect cross-slab, 184

Maltbeck, enamelled vessel, 138

Malton, fibula, 107

Malton, New, 82

Marlborough, bucket, 116

Mancha, La, spirals at, 50

Manchan, St., shrine of, 212

Manuscripts, illuminated, 173

Margam, cross, 186

Marlborough bucket, 144

Marne, La, cemeteries of, 11

Materials for study of Celtic art in Bronze Age, 22

Materials for study of Celtic art in Iron Age, 90

Materials for study of Celtic Christian art, 172

Materials used by Celtic sculptors, 233

Maughanby, cup-marks at, 57

— spirals at, 50

Maughold, Kirk, cross, 186

Meigle, coped stone, 182

— erect cross-slab, 184

Melfort, jet necklace from, 42

Metallurgy, Iron Age, 130

Metals used by Christian Celts, 234

Metalwork, Christian Celtic, 194

Methods employed by Celtic sculptors, 233

Methods employed by Celtic metalworkers, 234

Mevagh, wheel and symbol at, 59

Middleby, horse-trappings, 95

Middleton Common, Iron Age burial at, 67

Middleton Moor, enamelled bowl, 134

— — jet necklace from, 42

Migvie, erect cross-slab, 184

Mirrors, Late-Celtic, 115

Mirror, Trelan Bahow, 131

Mogue, St., bell-shrine, 204

Möklebust, enamelled bowl, 160

Molaise’s Gospels, shrine of, 209

Monasterboice, cross, 190, 224

Monifieth, erect cross-slab, 184

Monogram, Chi-Rho, 163

Moone Abbey, cross, 192

Mont Beuvray, enamels from, 138

— — pottery, 141

Monuments, sculptured, of Christian period, 180

Monymusk, reliquary, 210

Moresby, pin, 108

Moreton Hall, sword-sheath, 91

Morwick, spirals at, 50

Motives, decorative, in Bronze Age, 23

Motives used in Christian Celtic art, 242

Mount Batten, Iron Age cemetery at, 70

Mount Bures, fire-dogs, 118

Mount Caburn, pottery, 125

Mountings for harness, 98

Mowroad, collar, 111

Mura, St., bell-shrine, 204

Mycenæan art, 57

Nancy, chalice, 215

Navan Rath, fibula, 106

Necklaces of jet, 42

Needham Market, enamelled bowl, 135

Neolithic dwellings, 16

Neuadd Siarman, cross, 190

Nevern, cross, 191

Newcastle, chains, 140

Newgrange tumulus, 43

Newry, armlet, 113

Niello, 235

Nigg, erect cross-slab, 182

Norrie’s law, leaf-shaped plates, 170

— — pin, 108

Northfield, Late-Celtic village, 82

Norton, enamelled fibula, 134

— enamelled harness-rings, 134

— horse-trappings, 94

Ogam-inscribed stones, 165

Okstrow, broch of, 82

— tankard, 116

Old Parks, tumulus, 56

Orange, Triumphal Arch of, 5

Orchomenos, spiral ornament at, 54

Origin of early Christian art, 238

Ornovasso, chains, 140

Orton Scar, penannular brooch, 227

Over-Haddon, enamelled bowl, 134

Oxford, enamelled bowl, 135

Pails, Late-Celtic, 116

P and Q Celts, 18

Panels, ornament arranged in, 255

Papil, erect cross-slab, 184

Parisi, 12

Patera, enamelled, 137

Patrick’s Will, St., bell-shrine, 204

Patrick’s, St., Gospels, shrine of, 209

Penally, cross, 193

Penannular brooch, 223

Pen-Arthur, cross-slab, 181

Penbryn, spoons, 121

Penmachno, Chi-Rho Monogram, 163

Penmon, cross, 185

Pens used by Celtic scribes, 232

Pentre Poeth, Ogam stone, 165

Perdeswell, collar, 111

Perfection of details of Celtic ornament, 256

Perforated metal plates, 236

Pergamos, 5

Perth, penannular brooch, 231

Philostratus, 133

Pins, Celtic, 219

— hammer-headed, 108

— Late-Celtic, 107

Pitalpin, armlet, 113

Pitkelloney, armlet, 113

— enamelled armlets, 134

Plait, cruciform breaks in, 262

— horizontal and vertical breaks in, 259

Plaques with Crucifixion, 218

Plato, 2

Plaitwork, 259

Plunton castle, armlet, 113

Polden Hill, enamelled harness-ring, 134

— — fibula, 106

— — horse-trappings, 95

Pol de Léon, St., bell, 201

Polybius, 3

Poole’s cave, 76, 81

Port-Blanc, dolmen, 39

Portland, Isle of, collar, 111

Pottery, Late Celtic, 121, 142

— painted, Mont Beuvray, 141

— sepulchral, in bronze age, 24

Prassede, San, Rome, 258

Presles, enamels from, 138

Prickwillow, saucepan, 117

Processes, technical, in Celtic Christian art, 232

— — iron age, 129

Psalter of St. John’s College, Cambridge, 178

— Vesp. A. i., 178

— Vit. F. xi., 178

Psalters, 176

Pyrmont, enamelled vessel, 138

Pytheas, 3

Rathconrath, wooden bowl, 127

Ravenna, screen, 245

Reask, inscribed stone, 166

Rectilinear patterns in Late-Celtic art, 159

Redlands, sculptured cist, 55

Relic shrines, 210

Repoussé metalwork, Iron Age, 132

Rhayader, gold armlet, 170

Ribchester, 82

— fibula, 107

Ricemarchus, Psalter of, 176

Ringham Low, fibula, 106

Rings for harness, 96

Rise, horse-trappings, 94

Risingham, 82

— enamelled fibula, 134

— fibula, 107

Riveting, Iron Age, 132

Rock-sculpture in Scandinavia, 60

Rodenbach, 13

Rogart, penannular brooch, 228

Rome taken by the Gauls, 4

Rosemarkie, erect cross-slab, 184, 283

Rossie Priory, erect cross-slab, 184

Rotherley, 82

Round towers, 196

Sadberge, sword-sheath, 91

Safety-pin type of fibula, 100

Saham Toney, cruciform harness-mounting, 98

— — enamelled harness-mounting, 143

— — horse-trappings, 94

Saltire patterns, 35

Sandy, pottery, 124

Sarcophagi, 193

Saucepans, Kelto-Roman, 117

Scandinavia, rock-sculpture in, 60

— spiral ornament in, 51

Scandinavian features in Celtic art, 252

Scattery Island, bell, 198

Scribes, pens, ink, etc., used by, 232

Scripture subjects in Celtic art, 296

Sculptured monuments of Christian period, 180

Sculptured stone at Newgrange, 49

Sculptured stones, Late-Celtic, 128

Sculpture on Bronze Age cists, 55

Seafield Tower, armlet, 113

Seal-box, enamelled, 134

Seamill Fort, 82

— — triskele pendant, 121

Sepulchral remains of Iron Age, 63

Seskin, sculptured cist, 55

Sesto-Calende, 9

Settings of coral, amber, glass, and crystal, 237

Shading, kinds of, in Late-Celtic art, 156

Shandwick, erect cross-slab, 184

Sheen, cup-marks at, 57

Shields, Late-Celtic, 92

— South, horse-trappings, 94

Shoebury, pottery, 124

Shrines of bells, 204

— of books, 208

— of relics, 210

Silchester, 82

— enamelled stand, 134

— fibula, 107, 154

Silian, cross-shaft, 270

Silures, 18

Situlæ, Hallstatt, 145

— Late-Celtic, 116

— of bronze, 86

Skaill, penannular brooch, 227

Sliabh na Calliaghe, 43

— — — bonework, 127

— — — engraved bones, 150

Soldering, 132

Somme-Bionne, 13

Southill, Chi-Rho Monogram, 163

Southwark, dagger-sheath, 92

Spear-head of bronze age, 39

Spiral, closely coiled, 60

— knot, 270

— ornament at Newgrange, 48

— — at Orchomenos, 54

— — in Bronze Age, 50

— — in Egypt, 54

— — in Scandinavia, 51

Spirals in Celtic Christian art, 284

— Late-Celtic, 154

— from Book of Durrow, 169

Spoons, Late-Celtic, 119

Stamfordbury, fire-dogs, 118

Stamford Hill, armlet, 114

— — fibula, 106

— — mirror, 115

Stand, enamelled, 134

Standon, enamelled vessel, 138

Stanhope, armlet, 113

Stanton, cup-marks at, 57

Stanwick, horse-trappings, 94

— Late-Celtic finds at, 75

— sword-sheath, 91

Step-patterns, 277

— in Late-Celtic art, 160

Stitchell, collar, 111

Stival, bell, 200

Stockholm, Gospels, 175

Stones, sculptured, Late-Celtic, 128

Storr, penannular brooch, 227

Stowe Missal, cover of, 170

— — shrine of, 209

Strathfillan, bell, 201

Strokestown Crannog, 81

— — fibula, 170

Strypes, spirals at, 50

Style, Late-Celtic, 143

Swastika anthropomorphs, 294

— curved, at Ilkley, 58

— — on Barlaston bowl, 58

— —, 60

— designs, Late-Celtic, 154

Sweden, bronze axe-head with spirals from, 52

Sword, Hallstatt, 8

Sword-sheath from La Tène, 11

— Hunsbury, 132

Sword-sheaths, Late Celtic, 91

Swords with antennæ, 86

Symbols used in Bronze Age, 22

Celtic art in Pagan and Christian times · 第 8 / 10 章