CHAPTER IX

THE LOYALISTS IN QUEBEC

It was a tribute to the stability of British rule in the

newly-won province of Quebec that at the very beginning

of the Revolutionary War loyal refugees began to flock

across the border. As early as June 2, 1774, Colonel

Christie, stationed at St Johns on the Richelieu, wrote

to Sir Frederick Haldimand at Quebec notifying him of

the arrival of immigrants; and it is interesting to note

that at that early date he already complained of 'their

unreasonable expectations.' In the years 1775 and 1776

large bodies of persecuted Loyalists from the Mohawk

valley came north with Sir John Johnson and Colonel

Butler; and in these years was formed in Canada the first

of the Loyalist regiments. It was not, however, until

the defeat of Burgoyne at Saratoga in 1778 that the full

tide of immigration set in. Immediately thereafter

Haldimand wrote to Lord George Germain, under date of

October 14, 1778, reporting the arrival of 'loyalists in

great distress,' seeking refuge from the revolted provinces.

Haldimand lost no time in making provision for their

reception. He established a settlement for them at

Machiche, near Three Rivers, which he placed under the

superintendence of a compatriot and a protege of his

named Conrad Gugy. The captains of militia in the

neighbourhood were ordered to help build barracks for

the refugees, provisions were secured from the merchants

at Three Rivers, and everything in reason was done to

make the unfortunates comfortable. By the autumn of 1778

there were in Canada, at Machiche and other places, more

than one thousand refugees, men, women, and children,

exclusive of those who had enlisted in the regiments.

Including the troops, probably no less than three thousand

had found their way to Canada.

With the conclusion of peace came a great rush to the

north. The resources of government were strained to the

utmost to provide for the necessities of the thousands

who flocked over the border-line. At Chambly, St Johns,

Montreal, Sorel, Machiche, Quebec, officers of government

were stationed to dole out supplies. At Quebec alone in

March 1784 one thousand three hundred and thirty-eight

'friends of government' were being fed at the public

expense. At Sorel a settlement was established similar

to that at Machiche. The seigneury of Sorel had been

purchased by the government in 1780 for military purposes,

and when the war was over it was turned into a Loyalist

reserve, on which huts were erected and provisions

dispensed. In all, there must have been nearly seven

thousand Loyalists in the province of Quebec in the winter

of 1783-84.

Complete details are lacking with regard to the temporary

encampments in which the Loyalists were hived; but there

are evidences that they were not entirely satisfied with

the manner in which they were looked after. One of the

earliest of Canadian county histories, [Footnote: _Dundas,

or a Sketch of Canadian History_, by James Croil, Montreal,

1861.] a book partly based on traditionary sources, has

some vague tales about the cruelty and malversation

practised by a Frenchman under whom the Loyalists were

placed at 'Mishish.' 'Mishish' is obviously a phonetic

spelling of Machiche, and 'the Frenchman' is probably

Conrad Gugy. Some letters in the Dominion Archives point

in the same direction. Under date of April 29, the

governor's secretary writes to Stephen De Lancey, the

inspector of the Loyalists, referring to 'the uniform

discontent of the Loyalists at Machiche.' The discontent,

he explains, is excited by a few ill-disposed persons.

'The sickness they complain of has been common throughout

the province, and should have lessened rather than

increased the consumption of provisions.' A Loyalist who

writes to the governor, putting his complaints on paper,

is assured that 'His Excellency is anxious to do everything

in his power for the Loyalists, but if what he can do

does not come up to the expectation of him and those he

represents, His Excellency gives the fullest permission

to them to seek redress in such manner as they shall

think best.'

What degree of justice there was in the complaints of

the refugees it is now difficult to determine. No doubt

some of them were confirmed grumblers, and many of them

had what Colonel Christie called 'unreasonable

expectations.' Nothing is more certain than that Sir

Frederick Haldimand spared no effort to accommodate the

Loyalists. On the other hand, it would be rash to assert

that in the confusion which then reigned there were no

grievances of which they could justly complain.

In the spring and summer of 1784 the great majority of

the refugees within the limits of the province of Quebec

were removed to what was afterwards known as Upper Canada.

But some remained, and swelled the number of the 'old

subjects' in the French province. Considerable settlements

were made at two places. One of these was Sorel, where

the seigneury that had been bought by the crown was

granted out to the new-comers in lots; the other was in

the Gaspe peninsula, on the shores of the Gulf of St

Lawrence and of Chaleur Bay. The seigneury of Sorel was

well peopled, for each grantee received only sixty acres

and a town lot, taking the rest of his allotment in some

of the newer settlements. The settlement in the Gaspe

peninsula was more sparse; the chief centre of population

was the tiny fishing village of Paspebiac. In addition

to these settlements, some of the exiles took up land on

private seigneuries; these, however, were not many, for

the government discouraged the practice, and refused

supplies to all who did not settle on the king's land.

At the present time, of all these Loyalist groups in the

province of Quebec scarce a trace remains: they have all

been swallowed up in the surrounding French population.

The Eastern Townships in the province of Quebec were not

settled by the United Empire Loyalists. In 1783 Sir

Frederick Haldimand set his face like flint against any

attempt on the part of the Loyalists to settle the lands

lying along the Vermont frontier. He feared that a

settlement there would prove a permanent thorn in the

flesh of the Americans, and might lead to much trouble

and friction. He wished that these lands should be left

unsettled for a time, and that, in the end, they should

be settled by French Canadians 'as an antidote to the

restless New England population.' Some of the more daring

Loyalists, in spite of the prohibition of the governor,

ventured to settle on Missisquoi Bay. When the governor

heard of it, he sent orders to the officer commanding at

St Johns that they should be removed as soon as the season

should admit of it; and instructions were given that if

any other Loyalists settled there, their houses were to

be destroyed. By these drastic means the government kept

the Eastern Townships a wilderness until after 1791, when

the townships were granted out in free and common socage,

and American settlers began to flock in. But, as will be

explained, these later settlers have no just claim to

the appellation of United Empire Loyalists.

The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1914 ed.] · 第 9 / 13 章