CHAPTER VI

THE EXODUS TO NOVA SCOTIA

When the terms of peace became known, tens of thousands

of the Loyalists shook the dust of their ungrateful

country from their feet, never to return. Of these the

more influential part, both during and after the war,

sailed for England. The royal officials, the wealthy

merchants, landowners, and professional men; the high

military officers--these went to England to press their

claims for compensation and preferment. The humbler

element, for the most part, migrated to the remaining

British colonies in North America. About two hundred

families went to the West Indies, a few to Newfoundland,

many to what were afterwards called Upper and Lower

Canada, and a vast army to Nova Scotia, New Brunswick,

and Prince Edward Island.

The advantages of Nova Scotia as a field for immigration

had been known to the people of New England and New York

before the Revolutionary War had broken out. Shortly

after the Peace of 1763 parts of the Nova Scotian peninsula

and the banks of the river St John had been sparsely

settled by colonists from the south; and during the

Revolutionary War considerable sympathy with the cause

of the Continental Congress was shown by these colonists

from New England. Nova Scotia, moreover, was contiguous

to the New England colonies, and it was therefore not

surprising that after the Revolution the Loyalists should

have turned their eyes to Nova Scotia as a refuge for

their families.

The first considerable migration took place at the time

of the evacuation of Boston by General Howe in March

1776. Boston was at that time a town with a population

of about sixteen thousand inhabitants, and of these nearly

one thousand accompanied the British Army to Halifax.

'Neither Hell, Hull, nor Halifax,' said one of them, 'can

afford worse shelter than Boston.' The embarkation was

accomplished amid the most hopeless confusion. 'Nothing

can be more diverting,' wrote a Whig, 'than to see the

town in its present situation; all is uproar and confusion;

carts, trucks, wheelbarrows, handbarrows, coaches, chaises,

all driving as if the very devil was after them.' The

fleet was composed of every vessel on which hands 'could

be laid. In Benjamin Hallowell's cabin there were

thirty-seven persons--men, women, and children; servants,

masters, and mistresses--obliged to pig together on the

floor, there being no berths.' It was a miracle that the

crazy flotilla arrived safely at Halifax; but there it

arrived after tossing about for six days in the March

tempests. General Howe remained with his army at Halifax

until June. Then he set sail for New York. Some of the

Loyalists accompanied him to New York, but the greater

number took passage for England. Only a few of the company

remained in Nova Scotia.

From 1776 to 1783 small bodies of Loyalists continually

found their way to Halifax; but it was not until the

evacuation of New York by the British in 1783 that the

full tide of immigration set in. As soon as news leaked

out that the terms of peace were not likely to be

favourable, and it became evident that the animus of the

Whigs showed no signs of abating, the Loyalists gathered

in New York looked about for a country in which to begin

life anew. Most of them were too poor to think of going

to England, and the British provinces to the north seemed

the most hopeful place of resort. In 1782 several

associations were formed in New York for the purpose of

furthering the interests of those who proposed to settle

in Nova Scotia. One of these associations had as its

president the famous Dr Seabury, and as its secretary

Sampson Salter Blowers, afterwards chief justice of Nova

Scotia. Its officers waited on Sir Guy Carleton, and

received his approval of their plans. It was arranged

that a first instalment of about five hundred colonists

should set out in the autumn of 1782, in charge of three

agents, Amos Botsford, Samuel Cummings, and Frederick

Hauser, whose duty it should be to spy out the land and

obtain grants.

The party sailed from New York, in nine transport ships,

on October 19, 1782, and arrived a few days later at

Annapolis Royal. The population of Annapolis, which was

only a little over a hundred, was soon swamped by the

numbers that poured out of the transports. 'All the houses

and barracks are crowded,' wrote the Rev. Jacob Bailey,

who was then at Annapolis, 'and many are unable to procure

any lodgings.' The three agents, leaving the colonists

at Annapolis, went first to Halifax, and then set out on

a trip of exploration through the Annapolis valley, after

which they crossed the Bay of Fundy and explored the

country adjacent to the river St John. On their return

they published glowing accounts of the country, and their

report was transmitted to their friends in New York.

The result of the favourable reports sent in by these

agents, and by others who had gone ahead, was an invasion

of Nova Scotia such as no one, not even the provincial

authorities, had begun to expect. As the names of the

thousands who were anxious to go to Nova Scotia poured

into the adjutant-general's office in New York, it became

clear to Sir Guy Carleton that with the shipping facilities

at his disposal he could not attempt to transport them

all at once. It was decided that the ships would have to

make two trips; and, as a matter of fact, most of them

made three or four trips before the last British soldier

was able to leave the New York shore.

On April 26, 1783, the first or 'spring' fleet set sail.

It had on board no less than seven thousand persons, men,

women, children, and servants. Half of these went to the

mouth of the river St John, and about half to Port Roseway,

at the south-west end of the Nova Scotian peninsula. The

voyage was fair, and the ships arrived at their destinations

without mishap. But at St John at least, the colonists

found that almost no preparations had been made to receive

them. They were disembarked on a wild and primeval shore,

where they had to clear away the brushwood before they could

pitch their tents or build their shanties. The prospect

must have been disheartening. 'Nothing but wilderness

before our eyes, the women and children did not refrain

from tears,' wrote one of the exiles; and the grandmother

of Sir Leonard Tilley used to tell her descendants, 'I

climbed to the top of Chipman's Hill and watched the

sails disappearing in the distance, and such a feeling

of loneliness came over me that, although I had not shed

a tear through all the war, I sat down on the damp moss

with my baby in my lap and cried.'

All summer and autumn the ships kept plying to and fro.

In June the 'summer fleet' brought about 2,500 colonists

to St John River, Annapolis, Port Roseway, and Fort

Cumberland. By August 23 John Parr, the governor of Nova

Scotia, wrote that 'upward of 12,000 souls have already

arrived from New York,' and that as many more were

expected. By the end of September he estimated that 18,000

had arrived, and stated that 10,000 more were still to

come. By the end of the year he computed the total

immigration to have amounted to 30,000. As late as January

15, 1784, the refugees were still arriving. On that date

Governor Parr wrote to Lord North announcing the arrival

of 'a considerable number of Refugee families, who must

be provided for in and about the town at extraordinary

expence, as at this season of the year I cannot send them

into the country.' 'I cannot,' he added, 'better describe

the wretched condition of these people than by inclosing

your lordship a list of those just arrived in the Clinton

transport, destitute of almost everything, chiefly women

and children, all still on board, as I have not yet been

able to find any sort of place for them, and the cold

setting in severe.' There is a tradition in Halifax that

the cabooses had to be taken off the ships, and ranged

along the principal street, in order to shelter these

unfortunates during the winter.

New York was evacuated by the British troops on November

25, 1783. Sir Guy Carleton did not withdraw from the city

until he was satisfied that every person who desired the

protection of the British flag was embarked on the boats.

During the latter half of the year Carleton was repeatedly

requested by Congress to fix some precise limit to his

occupation of New York. He replied briefly, but courteously,

that he was doing the best he could, and that no man

could do more. When Congress objected that the Loyalists

were not included in the agreement with regard to

evacuation, Carleton replied that he held opposite views;

and that in any case it was a point of honour with him

that no troops should embark until the last person who

claimed his protection should be safely on board a British

ship. As time went on, his replies to Congress grew

shorter and more incisive. On being requested to name an

outside date for the evacuation of the city, he declared

that he could not even guess when the last ship would be

loaded, but that he was resolved to remain until it was.

He pointed out, moreover, that the more the uncontrolled

violence of their citizens drove refugees to his protection,

the longer would evacuation be delayed. 'I should show,'

he said, 'an indifference to the feelings of humanity,

as well as to the honour and interest of the nation whom

I serve, to leave any of the Loyalists that are desirous

to quit the country, a prey to the violence they conceive

they have so much cause to apprehend.'

After the evacuation of New York, therefore, the number

of refugee Loyalists who came to Nova Scotia was small

and insignificant. In 1784 and 1785 there arrived a few

persons who had tried to take up the thread of their

former life in the colonies, but had given up the attempt.

And in August 1784 the _Sally_ transport from London cast

anchor at Halifax with three hundred destitute refugees

on board. 'As if there was not a sufficiency of such

distress'd objects already in this country,' wrote Edward

Winslow from Halifax, 'the good people of England have

collected a whole ship load of all kinds of vagrants from

the streets of London, and sent them out to Nova Scotia.

Great numbers died on the passage of various disorders--the

miserable remnant are landed here and have now no covering

but tents. Such as are able to crawl are begging for a

proportion of provisions at my door.'

But the increase of population in Nova Scotia from

immigration during the years immediately following 1783

was partly counterbalanced by the defections from the

province. Many of the refugees quailed before the prospect

of carving out a home in the wilderness. 'It is, I think,

the roughest land I ever saw'; 'I am totally discouraged';

'I am sick of this Province'--such expressions as these

abound in the journals and diaries of the settlers. There

were complaints that deception had been practised. 'All

our golden promises,' wrote a Long Island Loyalist, 'are

vanished in smoke. We were taught to believe this place

was not barren and foggy as had been represented, but we

find it ten times worse. We have nothing but his Majesty's

rotten pork and unbaked flour to subsist on... It is the

most inhospitable clime that ever mortal set foot on.'

At first there was great distress among the refugees.

The immigration of 1783 had at one stroke trebled the

population of Nova Scotia; and the resources of the

province were inadequate to meet the demand on them.

'Nova Scarcity' was the nickname for the province invented

by a New England wit. Under these circumstances it is

not surprising that some who had set their hand to the

plough turned back. Some of them went to Upper Canada;

some to England; some to the states from which they had

come; for within a few years the fury of the anti-Loyalist

feeling died down, and not a few Loyalists took advantage

of this to return to the place of their birth.

The most careful analysis of the Loyalist immigration

into the Maritime Provinces has placed the total number

of immigrants at about 35,000. These were in settlements

scattered broadcast over the face of the map. There was

a colony of 3,000 in Cape Breton, which afforded an ideal

field for settlement, since before 1783 the governor of

Nova Scotia had been precluded from granting lands there.

In 1784 Cape Breton was erected into a separate government,

with a lieutenant-governor of its own; and settlers

flocked into it from Halifax, and even from Canada.

Abraham Cuyler, formerly mayor of Albany, led a considerable

number down the St Lawrence and through the Gulf to Cape

Breton. On the mainland of Nova Scotia there were

settlements at Halifax, at Shelburne, at Fort Cumberland,

at Annapolis and Digby; at Port Mouton, and at other

places. In what is now New Brunswick there was a settlement

at Passamaquoddy Bay, and there were other settlements

on the St John river extending from the mouth up past

what is now the city of Fredericton. In Prince Edward

Island, then called the Island of St John, there was a

settlement which is variously estimated in size, but

which was comparatively unimportant.

The most interesting of these settlements was that at

Shelburne, which is situated at the south-west corner of

Nova Scotia, on one of the finest harbours of the Atlantic

seaboard. The name of the harbour was originally Port

Razoir, but this was corrupted by the English settlers

into Port Roseway. The place had been settled previous

to 1783. In 1775 Colonel Alexander McNutt, a notable

figure of the pre-Loyalist days in Nova Scotia, had

obtained a grant of 100,000 acres about the harbour, and

had induced about a dozen Scottish and Irish families to

settle there. This settlement he had dignified with the

name of New Jerusalem. In a short time, however, New

Jerusalem languished and died, and when the Loyalists

arrived in May 1783, the only inhabitants of the place

were two or three fishermen and their families. It would

have been well if the Loyalists had listened to the

testimony of one of these men, who, when he was asked

how he came to be there, replied that 'poverty had brought

him there, and poverty had kept him there.'

The project of settling the shores of Port Roseway had

its birth in the autumn of 1782, when one hundred and

twenty Loyalist families, whose attention had been directed

to that part of Nova Scotia by a friend in Massachusetts,

banded together with the object of emigrating thither.

They first appointed a committee of seven to make

arrangements for their removal; and, a few weeks later,

they commissioned two members of the association, Joseph

Pynchon and James Dole, to go to Halifax and lay before

Governor Parr their desires and intentions. Pynchon and

Dole, on their arrival at Halifax, had an interview with

the governor, and obtained from him very satisfactory

arrangements. The governor agreed to give the settlers

the land about Port Roseway which they desired. He promised

them that surveyors should be sent to lay out the grants,

that carpenters and a supply of 400,000 feet of lumber

should be furnished for building their houses, that for

the first year at least the settlers should receive army

rations, and that they should be free for ever from

impressment in the British Navy. All these promises were

made on the distinct understanding that they should

interfere in no way with the claims of the Loyalists on

the British government for compensation for losses

sustained in the war. Elated by the reception they had

received from the governor, the agents wrote home

enthusiastic accounts of the prospects of the venture.

Pynchon even hinted that the new town would supersede

Halifax. 'Much talk is here,' he wrote, 'of capital of

Province... Halifax can't but be sensible that Port

Roseway, if properly attended to in encouraging settlers

of every denomination, will have much the advantage of

all supplies from the Bay of Fundy and westward. What

the consequence will be time only will reveal.' Many

persons at Halifax, wrote Pynchon, prophesied that the

new settlement would dwindle, and recommended the shore

of the Bay of Fundy or the banks of the river St John in

preference to Port Roseway; but Pynchon attributed their

fears to jealousy. A few years' experience must have

convinced him that his suspicions were ill-founded.

The first instalment of settlers, about four thousand in

number, arrived in May 1783. They found nothing but the

virgin wilderness confronting them. But they set to work

with a will to clear the land and build their houses.

'As soon as we had set up a kind of tent,' wrote the Rev.

Jonathan Beecher in his Journal, 'we knelt down, my wife

and I and my two boys, and kissed the dear ground and

thanked God that the flag of England floated there, and

resolved that we would work with the rest to become again

prosperous and happy.' By July 11 the work of clearing

had been so far advanced that it became possible to allot

the lands. The town had been laid out in five long parallel

streets, with other streets crossing them at right angles.

Each associate was given a town lot fronting on one of

these streets, as well as a water lot facing the harbour,

and a fifty-acre farm in the surrounding country. With

the aid of the government artisans, the wooden houses

were rapidly run up; and in a couple of months a town

sprang up where before had been the forest and some

fishermen's huts.

At the end of July Governor Parr paid the town a visit,

and christened it, curiously enough, with the name of

Shelburne, after the British statesman who was responsible

for the Peace of Versailles. The occasion was one of

great ceremony. His Excellency, as he landed from the

sloop _Sophie_, was saluted by the booming of cannon from

the ships and from the shore. He proceeded up the main

street, through a lane of armed men. At the place appointed

for his reception he was met by the magistrates and

principal citizens, and presented with an address. In

the evening there was a dinner given by Captain Mowat on

board the _Sophie_; and the next evening there was another

dinner at the house of Justice Robertson, followed by a

ball given by the citizens, which was 'conducted with

the greatest festivity and decorum,' and 'did not break

up till five the next morning.' Parr was delighted with

Shelburne, and wrote to Sir Guy Carleton, 'From every

appearance I have not a doubt but that it will in a short

time become the most flourishing Town for trade of any

in this part of the world, and the country will for

agriculture.'

For a few years it looked as though Shelburne was not

going to belie these hopes. The autumn of 1783 brought

a considerable increase to its population; and in 1784

it seems to have numbered no less than ten thousand souls,

including the suburb of Burchtown, in which most of the

negro refugees in New York had been settled. It became

a place of business and fashion. There was for a time an

extensive trade in fish and lumber with Great Britain

and the West Indies. Ship-yards were built, from which

was launched the first ship built in Nova Scotia after

the British occupation. Shops, taverns, churches,

coffee-houses, sprang up. At one time no less than three

newspapers were published in the town. The military were

stationed there, and on summer evenings the military band

played on the promenade near the bridge. On election

day the main street was so crowded that 'one might have

walked on the heads of the people.'

Then Shelburne fell into decay. It appeared that the

region was ill-suited for farming and grazing, and was

not capable of supporting so large a population. The

whale fishery which the Shelburne merchants had established

in Brazilian waters proved a failure. The regulations of

the Navigation Acts thwarted their attempts to set up a

coasting trade. Failure dogged all their enterprises,

and soon the glory of Shelburne departed. It became like

a city of the dead. 'The houses,' wrote Haliburton, 'were

still standing though untenanted: It had all the stillness

and quiet of a moonlight scene. It was difficult to

imagine it was deserted. The idea of repose more readily

suggested itself than decay. All was new and recent.

Seclusion, and not death or removal, appeared to be the

cause of the absence of inhabitants.' The same eye-witness

of Shelburne's ruin described the town later:

The houses, which had been originally built of wood,

had severally disappeared. Some had been taken to

pieces and removed to Halifax or St John; others had

been converted into fuel, and the rest had fallen a

prey to neglect and decomposition. The chimneys stood

up erect, and marked the spot around which the social

circle had assembled; and the blackened fireplaces,

ranged one above another, bespoke the size of the

tenement and the means of its owner. In some places

they had sunk with the edifice, leaving a heap of

ruins, while not a few were inclining to their fall,

and awaiting the first storm to repose again in the

dust that now covered those who had constructed them.

Hundreds of cellars with their stone walls and granite

partitions were everywhere to be seen like uncovered

monuments of the dead. Time and decay had done their

work. All that was perishable had perished, and those

numerous vaults spoke of a generation that had passed

away for ever, and without the aid of an inscription,

told a tale of sorrow and of sadness that overpowered

the heart.

Alas for the dreams of the Pynchons and the Parrs!

Shelburne is now a quaint and picturesque town; but it

is not the city which its projectors planned.

The United Empire Loyalists: A Chronicle of the Great Migration [1914 ed.] · 第 6 / 13 章