CHAPTER XXVII

THE REFORMATION AND THE RELIGIOUS WARS, 1517-1648 A.D. [1]

228. DECLINE OF THE PAPACY

THE PAPACY IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY

The Papacy, victorious in the long struggle with the Holy Roman Empire,

reached during the thirteenth century the height of its temporal power.

The popes at this time were the greatest sovereigns in Europe. They ruled

a large part of Italy, had great influence in the affairs of France,

England, Spain, and other countries, and in Germany named and deposed

emperors. From their capital at Rome they sent forth their legates to

every European court and issued the laws binding on western Christendom.

FRICTION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE

The universal dominion of the Church proved useful and even necessary in

feudal times, when kings were weak and nobles were strong. The Church of

the early Middle Ages served as the chief unifying force in Europe. When,

however, the kings had repressed feudalism, they took steps to extend

their authority over the Church as well. They tried, therefore, to

restrict the privileges of ecclesiastical courts, to impose taxes on the

clergy, as on their own subjects, and to dictate the appointment of

bishops and abbots to office. This policy naturally led to much friction

between popes and kings, between Church and State.

PONTIFICATE OF BONIFACE VIII, 1294-1303 A.D.

The Papacy put forth its most extensive claims under Boniface VIII. The

character of these claims is shown by two bulls which he issued. The first

forbade all laymen, under penalty of excommunication, to collect taxes on

Church lands, and all clergymen to pay them. The second announced in

unmistakable terms both the spiritual and the temporal supremacy of the

popes. "Submission to the Roman pontiff," declared Boniface, "is

altogether necessary to salvation for every human creature".

BONIFACE AND PHILIP THE FAIR

Boniface had employed the exalted language of Gregory VII in dealing with

Henry IV, but he found an opponent in a monarch more resolute and

resourceful than any Holy Roman Emperor. This was Philip the Fair, [2]

king of France. Philip answered the first bull by refusing to allow any

gold and silver to be exported from France to Italy. The pope, thus

deprived of valuable revenues, gave way and acknowledged that the French

ruler had a limited right to tax the clergy. Another dispute soon arose,

however, as the result of Philip's imprisonment and trial of an obnoxious

papal legate. Angered by this action, Boniface prepared to excommunicate

the king and depose him from the throne. Philip retaliated by calling

together the Estates-General and asking their support for the preservation

of the "ancient liberty of France." The nobles, the clergy, and the "third

estate" rallied around Philip, accused the pope of heresy and tyranny, and

declared that the French king was subject to God alone.

ANAGNI, 1303 A.D.

The last act of the drama was soon played. Philip sent his emissaries into

Italy to arrest the pope and bring him to trial before a general council

in France. At Anagni, near Rome, a band of hireling soldiers stormed the

papal palace and made Boniface a prisoner. The citizens of Anagni soon

freed him, but the shock of the humiliation broke the old man's spirit and

he died soon afterwards. The poet Dante, in the _Divine Comedy_, [3]

speaks with awe of the outrage: "Christ had been again crucified among

robbers; and the vinegar and gall had been again pressed to his lips". [4]

The historian sees in this event the end of the temporal power of the

Papacy.

THE "BABYLONION CAPTIVITY," 1309-1377 A.D.

Soon after the death of Boniface, Philip succeeded in having the

archbishop of Bordeaux chosen as head of the Church. The new pope removed

the papal court to Avignon, a town just outside the French frontier of

those days. The popes lived in Avignon for nearly seventy years. This

period is usually described as the "Babylonian Captivity" of the Church, a

name which recalls the exile of the Jews from their native land. [5] The

long absence of the popes from Rome lessened their power, and the

suspicion that they were the mere vassals of the French crown seriously

impaired the respect in which they had been held.

THE "GREAT SCHISM," 1378-1417 A.D.

Following the "Babylonian Captivity" came the "Great Schism." Shortly

after the return of the papal court to Rome, an Italian was elected pope

as Urban VI. The cardinals in the French interest refused to accept him,

declared his election void, and named Clement VII as pope. Clement

withdrew to Avignon, while Urban remained in Rome. Western Christendom

could not decide which one to obey. Some countries declared for Urban,

while other countries accepted Clement. The spectacle of two rival popes,

each holding himself out as the only true successor of St. Peter,

continued for about forty years and injured the Papacy more than anything

else that had happened to it.

COUNCIL OF CONSTANCE, 1414-1418 A.D.

The schism in western Christendom was finally healed at the Council of

Constance. There were three "phantom popes" at this time, but they were

all deposed in favor of a new pontiff, Martin V. The Catholic world now

had a single head, but it was not easy to revive the old, unquestioning

loyalty to him as God's vicar on earth.

THE RENAISSANCE POPES

From the time of Martin V the Papacy became more and more an Italian

power. The popes neglected European politics and gave their chief

attention to the States of the Church. A number of the popes took much

interest in the Renaissance movement and became its enthusiastic patrons.

[6] They kept up splendid courts, collected manuscripts, paintings, and

statues, and erected magnificent palaces and churches in Rome. Some

European peoples, especially in Germany, looked askance at such luxury and

begrudged the heavy taxes which were necessary to support it. This feeling

against the papacy also helped to provoke the Reformation.

[Illustration: Map, THE GREAT SCHISM, 1378-1417 A.D.]

COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE CLERGY

The worldliness of some of the popes was too often reflected in the lives

of the lesser clergy. Throughout the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth

centuries the Church encountered much criticism from reformers. Thus, the

famous humanist, Erasmus, [7] wrote his _Praise of Folly_ to expose the

vices and temporal ambitions of bishops and monks, the foolish

speculations of theologians, and the excessive reliance which common

people had on pilgrimages, festivals, relics, and other aids to devotion.

So great was the demand for this work that it went through twenty-seven

large editions during the author's lifetime. Erasmus and others like him

were loyal sons of the Church, but they believed they could best serve her

interests by effecting her reform. Some men went further, however, and

demanded wholesale changes in Catholic belief and worship. These men were

the heretics.

229. HERESIES AND HERETICS

PERSECUTION OF HERETICS

During the first centuries of our era, when the Christians had formed a

forbidden sect, they claimed toleration on the ground that religious

belief is voluntary and not something which can be enforced by law. This

view changed after Christianity triumphed in the Roman Empire and enjoyed

the support, instead of the opposition, of the government. The Church,

backed by the State, no longer advocated freedom of conscience, but began

to persecute people who held heretical beliefs.

MEDIEVAL ATTITUDE TOWARD HERESY

It is difficult for those who live in an age of religious toleration to

understand the horror which heresy inspired in the Middle Ages. A heretic

was a traitor to the Church, for he denied the doctrines believed to be

essential to salvation. It seemed a Christian duty to compel the heretic

to recant, lest he imperil his eternal welfare. If he persisted in his

impious course, then the earth ought to be rid of one who was a source of

danger to the faithful and an enemy of the Almighty.

PUNISHMENT OF HERESY

Although executions for heresy had occurred as early as the fourth

century, [8] for a long time milder penalties were usually inflicted. The

heretic might be exiled, or imprisoned, or deprived of his property and

his rights as a citizen. The death penalty was seldom invoked by the

Church before the thirteenth century. Since ecclesiastical law forbade the

Church to shed blood, the State stepped in to seize the heretic and put

him to death, most often by fire. We must remember that in medieval times

cruel punishments were imposed for even slight offenses, and hence men saw

nothing wrong in inflicting the worst of punishments for what was believed

to be the worst of crimes.

THE ALBIGENSES

In spite of all measures of repression heretics were not uncommon during

the later Middle Ages. Some heretical movements spread over entire

communities. The most important was that of the Albigenses, so called from

the town of Albi in southern France, where many of them lived. Their

doctrines are not well known, but they seem to have believed in the

existence of two gods--one good (whose son was Christ), the other evil

(whose son was Satan). The Albigenses even set up a rival church, with its

priests, bishops, and councils.

CRUSADE AGAINST THE ALBIGENSES, 1209-1229 A.D.

The failure of attempts to convert the Albigenses by peaceful means led

the pope, Innocent III, [9] to preach a crusade against them. Those who

entered upon it were promised the usual privileges of crusaders. [10] A

series of bloody wars now followed, in the course of which thousands of

men, women, and children perished. But the Albigensian sect did not

entirely disappear for more than a century, and then only after numberless

trials and executions for heresy.

THE WALDENSES

The followers of Peter Waldo, who lived in the twelfth century, made no

effort to set up a new religion in Europe. They objected, however, to

certain practices of the Church, such as masses for the dead and the

adoration of saints. They also condemned the luxury of the clergy and

urged that Christians should live like the Apostles, charitable and poor.

To the Waldenses the Bible was a sufficient guide to the religious life,

and so they translated parts of the scriptures and allowed everyone to

preach, without distinction of age, or rank, or sex. The Waldenses spread

through many European countries, but being poor and lowly men they did not

exert much influence as reformers. The sect survived severe persecution

and now forms a branch of the Protestant Church in Italy.

JOHN WYCLIFFE, 1320-1384 A.D.

Beliefs very similar to those of the Waldenses were entertained by John

Wycliffe, (or Wyclif) master of an Oxford college and a popular preacher.

He, too, appealed from the authority of the Church to the authority of the

Bible. With the assistance of two friends Wycliffe produced the first

English translation of the Scriptures. Manuscript copies of the work had a

large circulation, until the government suppressed it. Wycliffe was not

molested in life, but the Council of Constance denounced his teaching and

ordered that his bones should be dug up, burned, and cast into a stream.

[Illustration: JOHN WYCLIFFE

After an old print.]

THE LOLLARDS

Wycliffe had organized bands of "poor priests" to spread the simple truths

of the Bible through all England. They went out, staff in hand and clad in

long, russet gowns, and preached to the common people in the English

language, wherever an audience could be found. The Lollards, as Wycliffe's

followers were known, not only attacked many beliefs and practices of the

Church, but also demanded social reforms. For instance, they declared that

all wars were sinful and were but plundering and murdering the poor to win

glory for kings. The Lollards had to endure much persecution for heresy.

Nevertheless their work lived on and sowed in England and Scotland the

seeds of the Reformation.

JOHN HUSS, 1373(?)-1415 A.D.

The doctrines of Wycliffe found favor with Anne of Bohemia, wife of King

Richard II, [11] and through her they reached that country. Here they

attracted the attention of John Huss, (or Hus) a distinguished scholar in

the university of Prague. Wycliffe's writings confirmed Huss in his

criticism of many doctrines of the Church. He attacked the clergy in

sermons and pamphlets and also objected to the supremacy of the pope. The

sentence of excommunication pronounced against him did not shake his

reforming zeal. Finally Huss was cited to appear before the Council of

Constance, then in session. Relying on the safe conduct given him by the

German emperor, Huss appeared before the council, only to be declared

guilty of teaching "many things evil, scandalous, seditious, and

dangerously heretical." The emperor then violated the safe conduct--no

promise made to a heretic was considered binding--and allowed Huss to be

burnt outside the walls of Constance. Thus perished the man who, more than

all others, is regarded as the forerunner of Luther and the Reformation.

THE HUSSITE WARS

The flames which burned Huss set all Bohemia afire. The Bohemians, a

Slavic people, regarded him as a national hero and made his martyrdom an

excuse for rebelling against the Holy Roman Empire. The Hussite wars,

which followed, thus formed a political rather than a religious struggle.

The Bohemians did not gain freedom, and their country still remains a

Hapsburg possession. But the sense of nationalism is not extinct there,

and Bohemia may some day become an independent state.

230. MARTIN LUTHER AND THE BEGINNING OF THE REFORMATION IN GERMANY, 1517-

1522 A.D.

MARTIN LUTHER, 1483-1546 A.D.

Though there were many reformers before the Reformation, the beginning of

that movement is rightly associated with the name of Martin Luther. He was

the son of a German peasant, who, by industry and frugality, had won a

small competence. Thanks to his father's self-sacrifice, Luther enjoyed a

good education in scholastic philosophy at the university of Erfurt.

Having taken the degrees of bachelor and master of arts, Luther began to

study law, but an acute sense of his sinfulness and a desire to save his

soul soon drove him into a monastery. There he read the Bible and the

writings of the Church Fathers and found at last the peace of mind he

sought. A few years later Luther paid a visit to Rome, which opened his

eyes to the worldliness and general laxity of life in the capital of the

Papacy. He returned to Germany and became a professor of theology in the

university of Wittenberg, newly founded by Frederick the Wise, elector of

Saxony. Luther's sermons and lectures attracted large audiences, students

began to flock to Wittenberg; and the elector grew proud of the rising

young teacher who was making his university famous.

[Illustration: MARTIN LUTHER

After a portrait by Hans Holbein the Younger.]

TETZEL AND INDULGENCES

But Luther was soon to emerge from his academic retirement and to become,

quite unintentionally, a reformer. In 1517 A.D. there came into the

neighborhood of Wittenberg a Dominican friar named Tetzel, granting

indulgences for the erection of the new St. Peter's at Rome. [12] An

indulgence, according to the teaching of the Church, formed a remission of

the temporal punishment, or penance [13] due to sin, if the sinner had

expressed his repentance and had promised to atone for his misdeeds. It

was also supposed to free the person who received it from some or all of

his punishment after death in Purgatory. [14] Indulgences were granted for

participation in crusades, pilgrimages, and other good works. Later on

they were granted for money, which was expected to be applied to some

pious purpose. Many of the German princes opposed this method of raising

funds for the Church, because it took so much money out of their

dominions. Their sale had also been condemned on religious grounds by Huss

and Erasmus.

POSTING OF THE NINETY-FIVE THESES, 1517 A.D.

Luther began his reforming career by an attack upon indulgences. He did

not deny their usefulness altogether, but pointed out that they lent

themselves to grave abuses. Common people, who could not understand the

Latin in which they were written, often thought that they wiped away the

penalties of sin, even without true repentance. These criticisms Luther

set forth in ninety-five theses or propositions, which he offered to

defend against all opponents. In accordance with the custom of medieval

scholars, Luther posted his theses on the door of the church at

Wittenberg, where all might see them. They were composed in Latin, but

were at once translated into German, printed, and spread broadcast over

Germany. Their effect was so great that before long the sale of

indulgences in that country almost ceased.

BURNING OF THE PAPAL BULL, 1520 A.D.

The scholarly critic of indulgences soon passed into an open foe of the

Papacy. Luther found that his theological views bore a close resemblance

to those of Wycliffe and John Huss, yet he refused to give them up as

heretical. Instead, he wrote three bold pamphlets, in one of which he

appealed to the "Christian nobility of the German nation" to rally

together against Rome. The pope, at first, had paid little attention to

the controversy about indulgences, declaring it "a mere squabble of

monks," but he now issued a bull against Luther, ordering him to recant

within sixty days or be excommunicated. The papal bull did not frighten

Luther or withdraw from him popular support. He burnt it in the market

square of Wittenberg, in the presence of a concourse of students and

townsfolk. This dramatic answer to the pope deeply stirred all Germany.

DIET OF WORMS, 1521 A.D.

The next scene of the Reformation was staged at Worms, at an important

assembly, or Diet, of the Holy Roman Empire. The Diet summoned Luther to

appear before it for examination, and the emperor, Charles V, gave him a

safe conduct. Luther's friends, remembering the treatment of Huss, advised

him not to accept the summons, but he declared that he would enter Worms

"in the face of the gates of Hell and the powers of the air." In the great

hall of the Diet Luther bravely faced the princes, nobles, and clergy of

Germany. He refused to retract anything he had written, unless his

statements could be shown to contradict the Bible. "It is neither right

nor safe to act against conscience," Luther said. "God help me. Amen."

LUTHER AT THE WARTBURG, 1521-1522 A.D.

Only one thing remained to do with Luther. He was ordered to return to

Wittenberg and there await the imperial edict declaring him a heretic and

outlaw. But the elector of Saxony, who feared for Luther's safety, had him

carried off secretly to the castle of Wartburg. Here Luther remained for

nearly a year, engaged in translating the New Testament into German. There

had been many earlier translations into German, but Luther's was the first

from the Greek original. His version, simple, forcible, and easy to

understand, enjoyed wide popularity and helped to fix for Germans the form

of their literary language. Luther afterwards completed a translation of

the entire Bible, which the printing press multiplied in thousands of

copies throughout Germany.

LUTHER'S LEADERSHIP

Though still under the ban of the empire, Luther left the Wartburg in 1522

A.D. and returned to Wittenberg. He lived here, unmolested, until his

death, twenty-four years later. During this time he flooded the country

with pamphlets, wrote innumerable letters, composed many fine hymns, [15]

and prepared a catechism, "a right Bible," said he, "for the laity." Thus

Luther became the guide and patron of the reformatory movement which he

had started.

231. CHARLES V AND THE SPREAD OF THE GERMAN REFORMATION, 1519-1556 A.D.

CHARLES V, EMPEROR, 1519-1556 A.D.

The young man who as Holy Roman Emperor presided at the Diet of Worms had

assumed the imperial crown only two years previously. A namesake of

Charlemagne, Charles V held sway over dominions even more extensive than

those which had belonged to the Frankish king. Through his mother, a

daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella, [16] he inherited Spain, Naples,

Sicily, and the Spanish possessions in the New World. Through his father,

a son of the emperor Maximilian I, he became ruler of Burgundy and the

Netherlands and also succeeded to the Austrian territories of the

Hapsburgs. Charles was thus the most powerful monarch in Europe.

CHARLES V AND THE LUTHERANS

Charles, as a devout Roman Catholic, had no sympathy for the Reformation.

At Worms, on the day following Luther's refusal to recant, the emperor had

expressed his determination to stake "all his dominions, his friends, his

body and blood, his life and soul" upon the extinction of the Lutheran

heresy. This might have been an easy task, had Charles undertaken it at

once. But a revolt in Spain, wars with the French king, Francis I, and

conflicts with the Ottoman Turks led to his long absence from Germany and

kept him from proceeding effectively against the Lutherans, until it was

too late.

[Illustration: Map, EUROPE at the Beginning of the Reformation, 1519 A.D.]

THE "REFORMED RELIGION"

The Reformation in Germany appealed to many classes. To patriotic Germans

it seemed a revolt against a foreign power--the Italian Papacy. To men of

pious mind it offered the attractions of a simple faith which took the

Bible as the rule of life. Worldly-minded princes saw in it an opportunity

to despoil the Church of lands and revenues. For these reasons Luther's

teachings found ready acceptance. Priests married, Luther himself setting

the example, monks left their monasteries, and the "Reformed Religion"

took the place of Roman Catholicism in most parts of northern and central

Germany. South Germany, however, did not fall away from the pope and has

remained Roman Catholic to the present time.

[Illustration: CHARLES V

A portrait of the emperor at the age of 48, by the Venetian painter

Titian.]

THE PROTESTANTS, 1529 A.D.

Though Germany had now divided into two religious parties, the legal

position of Lutheranism remained for a long time in doubt. A Diet held in

1526 A.D. tried to shelve the question by allowing each German state to

conduct its religious affairs as it saw fit. But at the next Diet, three

years later, a majority of the assembled princes decided that the Edict of

Worms against Luther and his followers should be enforced. The Lutheran

princes at once issued a vigorous protest against such action. Because of

this protest those who separated from the Roman Church came to be called

Protestants.

PEACE OF AUGSBURG, 1555 A.D.

It was not till 1546 A.D., the year of Luther's death, that Charles V felt

his hands free to suppress the rising tide of Protestantism. By this time

the Lutheran princes had formed a league for mutual protection. Charles

brought Spanish troops into Germany and tried to break up the league by

force. Civil war raged till 1555 A.D., when both sides agreed to the Peace

of Augsburg. It was a compromise. The ruler of each state--Germany then

contained over three hundred states--was to decide whether his subjects

should be Lutherans or Catholics. Thus the peace by no means established

religious toleration, since all Germans had to believe as their prince

believed. However, it recognized Lutheranism as a legal religion and ended

the attempts to crush the German Reformation.

LUTHERANISM IN SCANDINAVIA

Meanwhile Luther's doctrines spread into Scandinavian lands. The rulers of

Denmark, Norway, and Sweden closed the monasteries and compelled the Roman

Catholic bishops to surrender ecclesiastical property to the crown.

Lutheranism became henceforth the official religion of these three

countries.

232. THE REFORMATION IN SWITZERLAND; ZWINGLI AND CALVIN

HULDREICH ZWINGLI, 1484-1531 A.D.

The Reformation in Switzerland began with the work of Zwingli. He was the

contemporary but not the disciple of Luther. From his pulpit in the

cathedral of Zurich, Zwingli proclaimed the Scriptures as the sole guide

of faith and denied the supremacy of the pope. Many of the Swiss cantons

accepted his teaching and broke away from obedience to Rome. Civil war

soon followed between Protestants and Roman Catholics, and Zwingli fell in

the struggle. After his death the two parties made a peace which allowed

each canton to determine its own religion. Switzerland has continued to

this day to be part Roman Catholic and part Protestant.

JOHN CALVIN 1509-1564 A.D.

The Protestants in Switzerland did not remain long without a leader. To

Geneva came in 1536 A.D. a young Frenchman named Calvin. He had just

published his _Institutes of the Christian Religion_, a work which set

forth in an orderly, logical manner the main principles of Protestant

theology. Calvin also translated the Bible into French and wrote valuable

commentaries on nearly all the Scriptural books.

CALVIN AT GENEVA

Calvin at Geneva was sometimes called the Protestant pope. During his long

residence there he governed the people with a rod of iron. There were no

more festivals, no more theaters, no more dancing, music, and masquerades.

All the citizens had to attend two sermons on Sunday and to yield at least

a lip-assent to the reformer's doctrines. On a few occasions Calvin

proceeded to terrible extremities, as when he caused the Spanish

physician, Michael Servetus, to be burned to death, because of heretical

views concerning the Trinity. Nevertheless, Geneva prospered under

Calvin's rule and became a Christian commonwealth, sober and industrious.

The city still reveres the memory of the man who founded her university

and made her, as it were, the sanctuary of the Reformation.

[Illustration: JOHN CALVIN, after an old print.]

DIFFUSION OF CALVINISM

Calvin's influence was not confined to Geneva or even to Switzerland. The

men whom he trained and on whom he set the stamp of his stern, earnest,

God-fearing character spread Calvinism over a great part of Europe. In

Holland and Scotland it became the prevailing type of Protestantism, and

in France and England it deeply affected the national life. During the

seventeenth century the Puritans carried Calvinism across the sea to New

England, where it formed the dominant faith in colonial times.

233. THE ENGLISH REFORMATION, 1533-1658 A.D.

HENRY VIII, KING, 1509-1547 A.D.

The Reformation in Germany and Switzerland started as a national and

popular movement; in England it began as the act of a despotic sovereign,

Henry VIII. This second Tudor [17] was handsome, athletic, finely

educated, and very able, but he was also selfish, sensual, and cruel. His

father had created a strong monarchy in England by humbling both

Parliament and the nobles. When Henry VIII came to the throne, the only

serious obstacle in the way of royal absolutism was the Roman Church.

[Illustration: HENRY VIII

After a portrait by Hans Holbein the Younger.]

HENRY'S EARLY LOYALTY TO THE PAPACY

Henry showed himself at first a devoted Catholic. He took an amateur's

interest in theology and wrote with his own royal pen a book attacking

Luther. The pope rewarded him with the title of "Defender of the Faith," a

title which English sovereigns still bear. Henry at this time did not

question the authority of the Papacy. He even made his chief adviser

Cardinal Wolsey, the most conspicuous churchman in the kingdom.

PREPARATION FOR THE ENGLISH REFORMATION

At the beginning of Henry's reign the Church was still strong in England.

Probably most of the people were sincerely attached to it. Still, the

labors of Wycliffe and the Lollards had weakened the hold of the Church

upon the masses, while Erasmus and the Oxford scholars who worked with

him, by their criticism of ecclesiastical abuses, had done much to

undermine its influence with the intellectual classes. In England, as on

the Continent, the worldliness of the Church prepared the way for the

Reformation.

HENRY AND CATHERINE OF ARAGON

The actual separation from Rome arose out of Henry's matrimonial

difficulties. He had married a Spanish princess, Catherine of Aragon, the

aunt of the emperor Charles V and widow of Henry's older brother. The

marriage required a dispensation [18] from the pope, because canon law

forbade a man to wed his brother's widow. After living happily with

Catherine for eighteen years, Henry suddenly announced his conviction that

the union was sinful. This, of course, formed simply a pretext for the

divorce which Henry desired. Of his children by Catherine only a daughter

survived, but Henry wished to have a son succeed him on the throne.

Moreover, he had grown tired of Catherine and had fallen in love with Anne

Boleyn, a pretty maid-in-waiting at the court.

THE DIVORCE, 1533 A.D.

At first Henry tried to secure the pope's consent to the divorce. The pope

did not like to set aside the dispensation granted by his predecessor, nor

did he wish to offend the mighty emperor Charles V. Failing to get the

papal sanction, Henry obtained his divorce from an English court presided

over by Thomas Cranmer, archbishop of Canterbury. Anne Boleyn was then

proclaimed queen, in defiance of the papal bull of excommunication.

ACT OF SUPREMACY, 1534 A.D.

Henry's next step was to procure from his subservient Parliament a series

of laws which abolished the pope's authority in England. Of these, the

most important was the Act of Supremacy. It declared the English king to

be "the only supreme head on earth of the Church of England." At the same

time a new treason act imposed the death penalty on anyone who called the

king a "heretic, schismatic, tyrant, infidel, or usurper." The great

majority of the English people seem to have accepted this new legislation

without much objection; those who refused to do so perished on the

scaffold. The most eminent victim was Sir Thomas More, [19] formerly

Henry's Lord Chancellor and distinguished for eloquence and profound

learning. His execution sent a thrill of horror through Christendom.

THE MONASTERIES SUPPRESSED

The suppression of the monasteries soon followed the separation from Rome.

Henry declared to Parliament that they deserved to be abolished, because

of the "slothful and ungodly lives" led by the inmates. In some instances

this accusation may have been true, but the real reason for Henry's action

was his desire to crush the monastic orders, which supported the pope, and

to seize their extensive possessions. The beautiful monasteries were torn

down and the lands attached to them were sold for the benefit of the crown

or granted to Henry's favorites. The nobles who accepted this monastic

wealth naturally became zealous advocates of Henry's anti-papal policy.

[Illustration: RUINS OF MELROSE ABBEY

The little town of Melrose in Scotland contains the ruins of a very

beautiful monastery church built about the middle of the fifteenth

century. The principal part of the present remains is the choir, with

slender shafts, richly-carved capitals, and windows of exquisite stone-

tracery. The beautiful sculptures throughout the church were defaced at

the time of the Reformation. The heart of Robert Bruce is interred near

the site of the high altar.]

PROGRESS OF THE REFORMATION UNDER EDWARD VI, 1547-1553 A.D.

Though Henry VIII had broken with the Papacy, he remained Roman Catholic

in doctrine to the day of his death. Under his successor, Edward VI, the

Reformation made rapid progress in England. The young king's guardian

allowed reformers from the Continent to come to England, and the doctrines

of Luther, Zwingli, and Calvin were freely preached there. At this time

all paintings, statuary, wood carvings, and stained glass were removed

from church edifices. The use of tapers, incense, and holy water was also

discontinued. In order that religious services might be conducted in the

language of the people, Archbishop Cranmer and his co-workers prepared the

_Book of Common Prayer_. It consisted of translations into noble English

of various parts of the old Latin service books. With some changes, it is

still used in the Church of England and the Protestant Episcopal Church of

the United States.

THE CATHOLIC REACTION UNDER MARY TUDOR, 1553-1558 A.D.

The short reign of Mary Tudor, daughter of Catherine of Aragon, was marked

by a temporary setback to the Protestant cause. The queen prevailed on

Parliament to secure a reconciliation with Rome. She also married her

Roman Catholic cousin, Philip of Spain, the son of Charles V. Mary now

began a severe persecution of the Protestants. It gained for her the

epithet of "Bloody," but it did not succeed in stamping out heresy. Many

eminent reformers perished, among them Cranmer, the former archbishop.

Mary died childless, after ruling about five years, and the crown passed

to Anne Boleyn's daughter, Elizabeth. Under Elizabeth Anglicanism again

replaced Roman Catholicism as the religion of England.

234. THE PROTESTANT SECTS

EXTENT OF PROTESTANTISM

The Reformation was practically completed before the close of the

sixteenth century. In 1500 A.D. the Roman Church embraced all Europe west

of Russia and the Balkan peninsula. By 1575 A.D. nearly half of its former

subjects had renounced their allegiance. The greater part of Germany and

Switzerland and all of Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Holland, England, and

Scotland became independent of the Papacy. The unity of western

Christendom, which had been preserved throughout the Middle Ages, thus

disappeared and has not since been revived.

[Illustration: Map, EXTENT OF THE REFORMATION, 1524-1572 A.D.]

COMMON FEATURES OF PROTESTANTISM

The reformers agreed in substituting for the authority of popes and church

councils the authority of the Bible. They went back fifteen hundred years

to the time of the Apostles and tried to restore what they believed to be

Apostolic Christianity. Hence they rejected such doctrines and practices

as were supposed to have developed during the Middle Ages. The Reformation

also abolished the monastic system and priestly celibacy. The sharp

distinction between clergy and laity disappeared, for priests married,

lived among the people, and no longer formed a separate class. In general,

Protestantism affirmed the ability of every man to find salvation without

the aid of ecclesiastics. The Church was no longer the only "gate of

heaven."

[Illustration: CHAINED BIBLE

In the church of St. Crux, York.]

DIVISIONS AMONG PROTESTANTS

But the Protestant idea of authority led inevitably to differences of

opinion among the reformers. There were various ways of interpreting that

Bible to which they appealed as the rule of faith and conduct.

Consequently, Protestantism split up into many sects or denominations, and

these have gone on multiplying to the present day. Nearly all, however,

are offshoots from the three main varieties of Protestantism which

appeared in the sixteenth century.

LUTHERANISM AND ANGLICANISM

Lutheranism and Anglicanism presented some features in common. Both were

state churches, supported by the government; both had a book of common

prayer; and both recognized the sacraments of baptism, the eucharist, and

confirmation. The Church of England also kept the sacrament of ordination.

The Lutheran churches in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, as well as the

Church of England, likewise retained the episcopate.

CALVINISM

Calvinism departed much more widely from Roman Catholicism. It did away

with the episcopate and had only one order of clergy--the presbyters. [20]

It provided for a very simple form of worship. In a Calvinistic church the

service consisted of Bible reading, a sermon, extemporaneous prayers, and

hymns sung by the congregation. The Calvinists kept only two sacraments,

baptism and the eucharist. They regarded the first, however, as a simple

undertaking to bring up the child in a Christian manner, and the second as

merely a commemoration of the Last Supper.

THE REFORMATION AND FREEDOM

The break with Rome did not introduce religious liberty into Europe.

Nothing was further from the minds of Luther, Calvin, and other reformers

than the toleration of Reformation beliefs unlike their own. The early

Protestant sects punished dissenters as zealously as the Roman Church

punished heretics. Lutherans burned the followers of Zwingli in Germany,

Calvin put Servetus to death, and the English government, in the time of

Henry VIII and Elizabeth, executed many Roman Catholics. Complete freedom

of conscience and the right of private judgment in religion have been

secured in most European countries only within the last hundred years.

THE REFORMATION AND MORALS

The Reformation, however, did deepen the moral life of European peoples.

The faithful Protestant or Roman Catholic vied with his neighbor in trying

to show that his particular belief made for better living than any other.

The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, in consequence, were more earnest

and serious, if also more bigoted, than the centuries of the Renaissance.

235. THE CATHOLIC COUNTER REFORMATION

THE REFORMING POPES

The rapid spread of Protestantism soon brought about a Catholic Counter

Reformation in those parts of Europe which remained faithful to Rome. The

popes now turned from the cultivation of Renaissance art and literature to

the defense of their threatened faith. They made needed changes in the

papal court and appointed to ecclesiastical offices men distinguished for

virtue and learning. This reform of the Papacy dates from the time of Paul

III, who became pope in 1534 A.D. He opened the college of cardinals to

Roman Catholic reformers, even offering a seat in it to Erasmus. Still

more important was his support of the famous Society of Jesus, which had

been established in the year of his accession to the papal throne.

ST. IGNATIUS LOYOLA, 1491-1556 A.D.

The founder of the new society was a Spanish nobleman, Ignatius Loyola. He

had seen a good deal of service in the wars of Charles V against the

French. While in a hospital recovering from a wound Loyola read devotional

books, and these produced a profound change within him. He now decided to

abandon the career of arms and to become, instead, the knight of Christ.

So Loyola donned a beggar's robe, practiced all the kinds of asceticism

which his books described, and went on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. The

turning-point of his career came with his visit to Paris to study

theology. Here Loyola met the six devout and talented men who became the

first members of his society. They intended to work as missionaries among

the Moslems, but, when this plan fell through, they visited Rome and

placed their energy and enthusiasm at the disposal of the pope.

[Illustration: ST. IGNATIUS LOYOLA]

THE SOCIETY OF JESUS

Loyola's military training deeply affected the character of the new order.

The Jesuits, as their Protestant opponents styled them, were to be an army

of spiritual soldiers, living under the strictest obedience to their head,

or general. Like soldiers, again, they were to remain in the world, and

there fight manfully for the Church and against heretics. The society grew

rapidly; before Loyola's death it included over a thousand members; and in

the seventeenth century it became the most influential of all the

religious orders. [21] The activity of the Jesuits as preachers,

confessors, teachers, and missionaries did much to roll back the rising

tide of Protestantism in Europe.

JESUIT SCHOOLS

The Jesuits gave special attention to education, for they realized the

importance of winning over the young people to the Church. Their schools

were so good that even Protestant children often attended them. The

popularity of Jesuit teachers arose partly from the fact that they always

tried to lead, not drive their pupils. Light punishments, short lessons,

many holidays, and a liberal use of prizes and other distinctions formed

some of the attractive features of their system of training. It is not

surprising that the Jesuits became the instructors of the Roman Catholic

world. They called their colleges the "fortresses of the faith."

JESUIT MISSIONS

The missions of the Jesuits were not less important than their schools.

The Jesuits worked in Poland, Hungary, Bohemia, and other countries where

Protestantism threatened to become dominant. Then they invaded all the

lands which the great maritime discoveries of the preceding age had laid

open to European enterprise. In India, China, the East Indies, Japan, the

Philippines, Africa, and the two Americas their converts from heathenism

were numbered by hundreds of thousands.

ST. FRANCIS XAVIER, 1506-1552 A.D.

The most eminent of all Jesuit missionaries, St. Francis Xavier, had

belonged to Loyola's original band. He was a little, blue-eyed man, an

engaging preacher, an excellent organizer, and possessed of so attractive

a personality that even the ruffians and pirates with whom he had to

associate on his voyages became his friends. Xavier labored with such

devotion and success in the Portuguese colonies of the Far East as to gain

the title of "Apostle to the Indies." He also introduced Christianity in

Japan, where it flourished until a persecuting emperor extinguished it

with fire and sword.

COUNCIL OF TRENT, 1545-1563 A.D.

Another agency in the Counter Reformation was the great Church Council

summoned by Pope Paul III. The council met at Trent, on the borders of

Germany and Italy. It continued, with intermissions, for nearly twenty

years. The Protestants, though invited to participate, did not attend, and

hence nothing could be done to bring them back within the Roman Catholic

fold. This was the last general council of the Church for over three

hundred years. [22]

WORK OF THE COUNCIL

The Council of Trent made no essential changes in the Roman Catholic

doctrines, which remained as St. Thomas Aquinas [23] and other theologians

had set them forth in the Middle Ages. In opposition to the Protestant

view, it declared that the tradition of the Church possessed equal

authority with the Bible. It reaffirmed the supremacy of the pope over

Christendom. The council also passed important decrees forbidding the sale

of ecclesiastical offices and requiring bishops and other prelates to

attend strictly to their duties. Since the Council of Trent the Roman

Church has been distinctly a religious organization, instead of both a

secular and religious body, as was the Church in the Middle Ages. [24]

THE INDEX

The council, before adjourning, authorized the pope to draw up a list, or

Index, of works which Roman Catholics might not read. This action did not

form an innovation. The Church from an early day had condemned and

destroyed heretical writings. However, the invention of printing, by

giving greater currency to new and dangerous ideas, increased the

necessity for the regulation of thought. The "Index of Prohibited Books"

still exists, and additions to the list are made from time to time. It was

matched by the strict censorship of printing long maintained in Protestant

countries.

THE INQUISITION

Still another agency of the Counter Reformation consisted of the

Inquisition. This was a system of church courts for the discovery and

punishment of heretics. Such courts had been set up in the Middle Ages,

for instance, to suppress the Albigensian heresy. After the Council of

Trent they redoubled their activity, especially in Italy, the Netherlands,

and Spain.

INFLUENCE OF THE INQUISITION

The Inquisition probably contributed to the disappearance of Protestantism

in Italy. In the Netherlands, where it worked with great severity, it only

aroused exasperation and hatred and helped to provoke a successful revolt

of the Dutch people. The Spaniards, on the other hand, approved of the

methods of the Inquisition and welcomed its extermination of Moors and

Jews, as well as Protestant heretics. The Spanish Inquisition was not

abolished till the nineteenth century.

236. SPAIN UNDER PHILIP II, 1556-1598 A.D.

ABDICATION OF CHARLES V, 1555-1556 A.D.

In 1555 A.D., the year of the Peace of Augsburg, [25] Charles V determined

to abdicate his many crowns and seek the repose of a monastery. The plan

was duly carried into effect. His brother Ferdinand I succeeded to the

title of Holy Roman Emperor and the Austrian territories, while his son,

Philip II, [26] received the Spanish possessions in Italy, the

Netherlands, and America. There were now two branches of the Hapsburg

family--one in Austria and one in Spain.

PHILIP II

The new king of Spain was a man of unflagging energy, strong will, and

deep attachment to the Roman Church. As a ruler he had two great ideals:

to make Spain the foremost state in the world and to secure the triumph of

the Roman Catholic faith over Protestantism. His efforts to realize these

ideals largely determined European history during the second half of the

sixteenth century.

[Illustration: PHILIP II

After the portrait by Titian.]

BATTLE OF LEPANTO, 1571 A.D.

The Spanish monarch won renown by becoming the champion of Christendom

against the Ottoman Turks. At this time the Turks had a strong navy, by

means of which they captured Cyprus from the Venetians and ravaged Sicily

and southern Italy. Grave danger existed that they would soon control all

the Mediterranean. To stay their further progress one of the popes

preached what was really the last crusade. The fleets of Genoa and Venice

united with those of Spain and under Don John of Austria, Philip's half-

brother, totally defeated the Turkish squadron in the gulf of Lepanto, off

the western coast of Greece. The battle gave a blow to the sea-power of

the Turks from which they never recovered and ended their aggressive

warfare in the Mediterranean. Lepanto is one of the proud names in the

history of Spain.

ANNEXATION OF PORTUGAL, 1581 A.D.

Philip had inherited an extensive realm. He further widened it by the

annexation of Portugal, thus completing the unification of the Spanish

peninsula. The Portuguese colonies in Africa, Asia, and America also

passed into Spanish hands. The union of Spain and Portugal under one crown

never commanded any affection among the Portuguese, who were proud of

their nationality and of their achievements as explorers and empire-

builders. Portugal separated from Spain in 1640 A.D. and has since

remained an independent state.

[Illustration: THE ESCORIAL

This remarkable edifice, at once a convent, a church, a palace, and a

royal mausoleum, is situated in a sterile and gloomy wilderness about

twenty-seven miles from Madrid. It was begun by Philip II in 1563 A.D.

and was completed twenty-one years later. The Escorial is dedicated to St.

Lawrence, that saint's day (August 10, 1557) being the day when the

Spanish king won a great victory over the French at the battle of St.

Quentin. The huge dimensions of the Escorial may be inferred from the fact

that it includes eighty-six staircases, eighty-nine fountains, fifteen

cloisters, 1,200 doors, 2,600 windows, and miles of corridors. The

building material is a granite-like stone obtained in the neighborhood.

The Escorial contains a library of rare books and manuscripts and a

collection of valuable paintings. In the royal mausoleum under the altar

of the church lie the remains of Charles V, Philip II, and many of their

successors.]

PHILIP'S FAILURES

But the successes of Philip were more than offset by his failures. Though

he had vast possessions, enormous revenues, mighty fleets, and armies

reputed the best of the age, he could not dominate western Europe. His

attempt to conquer England, a stronghold of Protestantism under Elizabeth,

resulted in disaster. Not less disastrous was his life-long struggle with

the Netherlands.

237. REVOLT OF THE NETHERLANDS

THE NETHERLANDS

The seventeen provinces of the Netherlands occupied the flat, low country

along the North Sea--the Holland, Belgium, and northern France of the

present day. During the fifteenth century they became Hapsburg possessions

and thus belonged to the Holy Roman Empire. As we have learned, Charles V

received them as a part of his inheritance, and he, in turn, transmitted

them to Philip II.

CONDITION OF THE NETHERLANDS

The inhabitants of the Netherlands were not racially united. In the

southernmost provinces Celtic blood and Romance speech prevailed, while

farther north dwelt peoples of Teutonic extraction, who spoke Flemish and

Dutch. Each province likewise kept its own government and customs. The

prosperity which had marked the Flemish cities during the Middle Ages [27]

extended in the sixteenth century to the Dutch cities also. Rotterdam,

Leyden, Utrecht, and Amsterdam profited by the geographical discoveries

and became centers of extensive commerce with Asia and America. The rise

of the Dutch power, in a country so exposed to destructive inundations of

both sea and rivers, is a striking instance of what can be accomplished by

a frugal, industrious population.

PROTESTANTISM IN THE NETHERLANDS

The Netherlands were too near Germany not to be affected by the

Reformation. Lutheranism soon appeared there, only to encounter the

hostility of Charles V, who introduced the terrors of the Inquisition.

Many heretics were burned at the stake, or beheaded, or buried alive. But

there is no seed like martyr's blood. The number of Protestants swelled,

rather than lessened, especially after Calvinism entered the Netherlands.

As a Jesuit historian remarked, "Nor did the Rhine from Germany or the

Meuse from France send more water into the Low Countries than by the one

the contagion of Luther, and by the other that of Calvin, were imported

into these provinces."

POLICY OF PHILIP II

In spite of the cruel treatment of heretics by Charles V, both Flemish and

Dutch remained loyal to the emperor, because he had been born and reared

among them and always considered their country as his own. But Philip II,

a Spaniard by birth and sympathies, seemed to them only a foreign master.

The new ruler did nothing to conciliate the people. He never visited the

Netherlands after 1559 A.D., but governed them despotically through

Spanish officials supported by Spanish garrisons. Arbitrary taxes were

levied, cities and nobles were deprived of their cherished privileges, and

the activity of the Inquisition was redoubled. Philip intended to exercise

in the Netherlands the same absolute power which he enjoyed in Spain.

ALVA SENT TO THE NETHERLANDS, 1567 A.D.

The religious persecution which by Philip's orders raged through the

Netherlands everywhere aroused intense indignation. The result was rioting

by mobs of Protestants, who wrecked churches and monasteries and carried

off the treasure they found in them. Philip replied to these acts by

sending his best army, under the duke of Alva, his best general, to reduce

the turbulent provinces into submission.

OUTBREAK OF THE REVOLT

Alva carried out with thoroughness the policy of his royal master. A

tribunal, popularly known as the "Council of Blood," was set up for the

punishment of treason and heresy. Hundreds, and probably thousands,

perished; tens of thousands fled to Germany and England. Alva, as

governor-general, also raised enormous taxes, which threatened to destroy

the trade and manufactures of the Netherlands. Under these circumstances

Roman Catholics and Protestants, nobles and townsfolk, united against

their Spanish oppressors. A revolt began which Spain could never quell.

WILLIAM THE SILENT, 1533-1584 A.D.

The Netherlands found a leader in William, Prince of Orange, later known

as William the Silent, because of his customary discreetness. He was of

German birth, a convert to Protestantism, and the owner of large estates

in the Netherlands. William had fair ability as a general, a statesmanlike

grasp of the situation, and above all a stout, courageous heart which

never wavered in moments of danger and defeat. To rescue the Netherlands

from Spain he sacrificed his high position, his wealth, and eventually his

life.

[Illustration: WILLIAM THE SILENT]

SEPARATION OF THE NETHERLANDS

The ten southern provinces of the Netherlands, mainly Roman Catholic in

population, soon effected a reconciliation with Philip and returned to

their allegiance. They remained in Hapsburg hands for over two centuries.

Modern Belgium has grown out of them. The seven northern provinces, where

Dutch was the language and Protestantism the religion, formed in 1579 A.D.

the Union of Utrecht. Two years later they declared their independence of

Spain. Thus the republic of the United Netherlands, often known as

Holland, the most important of the seven provinces, came into being.

[Illustration: Map, THE NETHERLANDS IN THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY]

COURSE OF THE REVOLT

The struggle of the Dutch for freedom forms one of the most notable

episodes in history. At first they were no match for the disciplined

Spanish soldiery, but they fought bravely behind the walls of their cities

and on more than one occasion repelled the enemy by cutting the dikes and

letting in the sea. Though William the Silent perished in a dark hour by

an assassin's bullet, the contest continued. England now came to the aid

of the hard-pressed republic with money and a small army. Philip turned

upon his new antagonist and sent against England the great fleet called

the "Invincible Armada." Its destruction interfered with further attempts

to subjugate the Dutch, but the Spanish monarch, stubborn to the last,

refused to acknowledge their independence. His successor, in 1609 A.D.,

consented to a twelve years' truce with the revolted provinces. Their

freedom was recognized officially by Spain at the close of the Thirty

Years' War in 1648 A.D.

THE DUTCH REPUBLIC

The long struggle bound the Dutch together and made them one nation.

During the seventeenth century they took a prominent part in European

affairs. The republic which they founded ought to be of special interest

to Americans, for many features of our national government are Dutch in

origin. To Holland we owe the idea of a declaration of independence, of a

written constitution, of religious toleration, and of a comprehensive

school system supported by taxation. In these and other matters the Dutch

were pioneers of modern democracy.

238. ENGLAND UNDER ELIZABETH, 1558-1603 A.D.

ELIZABETH

Queen Elizabeth, who reigned over England during the period of the Dutch

revolt, came to the throne when about twenty-five years old. She was tall

and commanding in presence and endowed with great physical vigor and

endurance. After hunting all day or dancing all night she could still

attend unremittingly to public business. Elizabeth had received an

excellent education; she spoke Latin and several modern languages; knew a

little Greek; and displayed some skill in music. To her father, Henry

VIII, she doubtless owed her tactfulness and charm of manner, as well as

her imperious will; she resembled her mother, Anne Boleyn, in her vanity

and love of display. As a ruler Elizabeth was shrewd, far-sighted, a good

judge of character, and willing to be guided by the able counselors who

surrounded her. Above all, Elizabeth was an ardent patriot. She understood

and loved her people, and they, in turn, felt a chivalrous devotion to the

"Virgin Queen," to "Good Queen Bess".

PROTESTANTISM IN ENGLAND

The daughter of Anne Boleyn had been born under the ban of the pope, so

that opposition to Rome was the natural course for her to pursue. Two acts

of Parliament now separated England once more from the Papacy and gave the

English Church practically the form and doctrines which it retains to-day.

The church was intended to include everyone in England, and hence all

persons were required to attend religious exercises on Sundays and holy

days. Refusal to do so exposed the offender to a fine.

[Illustration: ELIZABETH]

TREATMENT OF ROMAN CATHOLICS

The great body of the people soon conformed to the state church, but Roman

Catholics could not conscientiously attend its services. The laws against

them do not seem to have been strictly enforced at first, but in the later

years of Elizabeth's reign real or suspected plots by Roman Catholics

against her throne led to a policy of repression. Those who said or heard

mass were heavily fined and imprisoned; those who brought papal bulls into

England or converted Protestants to Roman Catholicism were executed as

traitors. Several hundred priests, mostly Jesuits, suffered death, and

many more languished in jail. This persecution, however necessary it may

have seemed to Elizabeth and her advisers, is a blot on her reign.

PROTESTANTISM IN IRELAND

The Reformation made little progress in Ireland. Henry VIII, who had

extended English sway over most of the island, suppressed the monasteries,

demolished shrines, relics, and images, and placed English-speaking

priests in charge of the churches. The Irish people, who remained loyal to

Rome, regarded these measures as the tyrannical acts of a foreign

government. During Elizabeth's reign there were several dangerous revolts,

which her generals suppressed with great cruelty. The result was to widen

the breach between England and Ireland. Henceforth to most Irishmen

patriotism became identified with Roman Catholicism.

[Illustration: SILVER CROWN OF ELIZABETH'S REIGN]

ELIZABETH AND MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS

Many of the plots against Elizabeth centered about Mary Stuart, the ill-

starred Queen of Scots. She was a granddaughter of Henry VII, and extreme

Roman Catholics claimed that she had a better right to the English throne

than Elizabeth, because the pope had declared the marriage of Henry VIII

and Anne Boleyn null and void. Mary, a fervent Roman Catholic, did not

please her Scotch subjects, who had adopted Calvinistic doctrines. She

also discredited herself by marrying the man who had murdered her former

husband. An uprising of the Scottish nobles compelled Mary to abdicate the

throne in favor of her infant son [28] and to take refuge in England.

Elizabeth kept her rival in captivity for nearly twenty years. In 1586

A.D., the former queen was found guilty of conspiring against Elizabeth's

life and was beheaded.

[Illustration: Map, WESTERN EUROPE IN THE TIME OF ELIZABETH]

[Illustration: LONDON BRIDGE IN THE TIME OF ELIZABETH

The old structure was completed early in the thirteenth century. It

measured 924 feet in length and had 20 narrow arches. Note the rows of

houses and shops on the bridge, the chapel in the center and the gate

above which the heads of traitors were exhibited on pikes. The present

London Bridge was completed in 1831 A.D.]

ELIZABETH AND PHILIP II

Philip II, the king of Spain, also threatened Elizabeth's security. At the

outset of her reign Philip had made her an offer of marriage, but she

refused to give herself, or England, a Spanish master. As time went on,

Philip turned into an open enemy of the Protestant queen and did his best

to stir up sedition among her Roman Catholic subjects. It must be admitted

that Philip could plead strong justification for his attitude. Elizabeth

allowed the English "sea dogs" [29] to plunder Spanish colonies and seize

Spanish vessels laden with the treasure of the New World. Moreover, she

aided the rebellious Dutch, at first secretly and at length openly, in

their struggle against Spain. Philip put up with these aggressions for

many years, but finally came to the conclusion that he could never subdue

the Netherlands or end the piracy and smuggling in Spanish America without

first conquering England. The execution of Mary Stuart removed his last

doubts, for Mary had left him her claims to the English throne. He at once

made ready to invade England. Philip seems to have believed that as soon

as a Spanish army landed in the island, the Roman Catholics would rally to

his cause. But the Spanish king never had a chance to verify his belief;

the decisive battle took place on the sea.

THE "INVINCIBLE ARMADA," 1588 A.D.

Philip had not completed his preparations before Sir Francis Drake sailed

into Cadiz harbor and destroyed a vast amount of naval stores and

shipping. This exploit, which Drake called "singeing the king of Spain's

beard," delayed the expedition for a year. The "Invincible Armada" [30]

set out at last in 1588 A.D. The Spanish vessels, though somewhat larger

than those of the English, were inferior in number, speed, and gunnery to

their adversaries, while the Spanish officers, mostly unused to the sea,

were no match for men like Drake, Frobisher, and Raleigh, the best

mariners of the age. The Armada suffered severely in a nine-days fight in

the Channel, and many vessels which escaped the English guns met shipwreck

off the Scotch and Irish coasts. Less than half of the Armada returned in

safety to Spain.

[Illustration: THE SPANISH ARMADA IN THE ENGLISH CHANNEL.

After an engraving by the Society of Antiquarians following a tapestry in

the House of Lords.]

ENGLISH SEA-POWER

England in the later Middle Ages had been an important naval power, as her

ability to carry on the Hundred Years' War in France amply proved. But in

the sixteenth century she was greatly over-matched by Spain, especially

after the annexation of Portugal added the naval forces of that country to

the Spanish fleets. The defeat of the Armada not only did great harm to

the navy and commerce of Spain; it also showed that a new people had

arisen to claim the supremacy of the ocean. Henceforth the English began

to build up what was to be a sea-power greater than any other known to

history.

239. THE HUGUENOT WARS IN FRANCE

FRANCE UNDER FRANCIS I, 1515-1547 A.D.

By 1500 A.D. France had become a centralized state under a strong

monarchy. [31] Francis I, who reigned in the first half of the sixteenth

century, still further exalted the royal power. He had many wars with

Charles V, whose extensive dominions nearly surrounded the French kingdom.

These wars prevented the emperor from making France a mere dependency of

Spain. As we have learned, [32] they also interfered with the efforts of

Charles V to crush the Protestants in Germany.

THE HUGUENOTS

Protestantism in France dates from the time of Francis I. The Huguenots,

[33] as the French Protestants were called, naturally accepted the

doctrines of Calvin, who was himself a Frenchman and whose books were

written in the French language. Though bitterly persecuted by Francis I

and by his son Henry II (1547-1559 A.D.), the Huguenots gained a large

following, especially among the prosperous middle class of the towns--the

_bourgeoisie_. Many nobles also became Huguenots, sometimes because of

religious conviction, but often because the new movement offered them an

opportunity to recover their feudal independence and to plunder the

estates of the Church. In France, as well as in Germany, the Reformation

had its worldly side.

CIVIL WAR IN FRANCE

During most of the second half of the sixteenth century fierce conflicts

raged in France between the Roman Catholics and the Huguenots. Philip II

aided the former and Queen Elizabeth gave some assistance to the latter.

France suffered terribly in the struggle, not only from the constant

fighting, which cost the lives, it is said, of more than a million people,

but also from the pillage, burnings, and other barbarities in which both

sides indulged. The wealth and prosperity of the country visibly declined,

and all patriotic feeling disappeared in the hatreds engendered by a civil

war.

MASSACRE OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S DAY, 1572 A.D.

The episode known as the massacre of St. Bartholomew's Day illustrates the

extremes to which political ambition and religious bigotry could lead. The

massacre was an attempt to extirpate the Huguenots, root and branch, at a

time when peace prevailed between them and their opponents. The person

primarily responsible for it was Catherine de' Medici, mother of Charles

IX (1560-1574 A.D.), the youthful king of France. Charles had begun to

cast off the sway of his mother and to come under the influence of Admiral

de Coligny, the most eminent of the Huguenots. To regain her power

Catherine first tried to have Coligny murdered. When the plot failed, she

invented the story of a great Huguenot uprising and induced her weak-

minded son to authorize a wholesale butchery of Huguenots. It began in

Paris in the early morning of August 24, 1572 A.D. (St. Bartholomew's

Day), and extended to the provinces, where it continued for several weeks.

Probably ten thousand Huguenots were slain, including Coligny himself. But

the deed was a blunder as well as a crime. The Huguenots took up arms to

defend themselves, and France again experienced all the horrors of

internecine strife.

HENRY IV

The death of Coligny transferred the leadership of the Huguenots to Henry

Bourbon, king of Navarre. [34] Seventeen years after the massacre of St.

Bartholomew's Day, he inherited the French crown as Henry IV. The Roman

Catholics would not accept a Protestant ruler and continued the conflict.

Henry soon realized that only his conversion to the faith of the majority

of his subjects would bring a lasting peace. Religious opinions had always

sat lightly upon him, and he found no great difficulty in becoming a Roman

Catholic. "Paris," said Henry, "was well worth a mass." Opposition to the

king soon collapsed, and the Huguenot wars came to an end.

EDICT OF NANTES, 1598 A.D.

Though now a Roman Catholic, Henry did not break with the Huguenots. In

1598 A.D. he issued in their interest the celebrated Edict of Nantes. By

its terms the Huguenots were to enjoy freedom of private worship

everywhere in France, and freedom to worship publicly in a large number of

villages and towns. Only Roman Catholic services, however, might be held

in Paris and at the royal court. Though the edict did not grant complete

religious liberty, it marked an important step in that direction. A great

European state now for the first time recognized the principle that two

rival faiths might exist side by side within its borders. The edict was

thus the most important act of toleration since the age of Constantine.

[35]

FRANCE UNDER HENRY IV, 1588-1610 A.D.

Having settled the religious difficulties, Henry could take up the work of

restoring prosperity to distracted France. His interest in the welfare of

his subjects gained for him the name of "Good King Henry." With the help

of Sully, his chief minister, the king reformed the finances and

extinguished the public debt. He opened roads, built bridges, and dug

canals, thus aiding the restoration of agriculture. He also encouraged

commerce by means of royal bounties for shipbuilding. The French at this

time began to have a navy and to compete with the Dutch and English for

trade on the high seas. Henry's work of renovation was cut short in 1610

A.D. by an assassin's dagger. Under his son Louis XIII (1610-1643 A.D.), a

long period of disorder followed, until an able minister, Cardinal

Richelieu, assumed the guidance of public affairs. Richelieu for many

years was the real ruler of France. His foreign policy led to the

intervention of that country in the international conflict known as the

Thirty Years' War.

[Illustration: CARDINAL RICHELIEU (Louvre, Paris.)

After the portrait by the Belgian artist, Philippe de Champaigne.]

240. THE THIRTY YEARS' WAR, 1618-1648 A.D.

RELIGIOUS ANTAGONISMS

The Peace of Augsburg [36] gave repose to Germany for more than sixty

years, but it did not form a complete settlement of the religious question

in that country. There was still room for bitter disputes, especially over

the ownership of Church property which had been secularized in the course

of the Reformation. Furthermore, the peace recognized only Roman Catholics

and Lutherans and gave no rights whatever to the large body of Calvinists.

The failure of Lutherans and Calvinists to cooperate weakened German

Protestantism just at the period when the Counter Reformation inspired

Roman Catholicism with fresh energy and enthusiasm.

POLITICAL FRICTION

Politics, as well as religion, also helped to bring about the great

conflagration. The Roman Catholic party relied for support on the Hapsburg

emperors, who wished to unite the German states under their control, thus

restoring the Holy Roman Empire to its former proud position in the

affairs of Europe. The Protestant princes, on the other hand, wanted to

become independent sovereigns. Hence they resented all efforts to extend

the imperial authority over them.

THE BOHEMIAN REVOLT

The Thirty Years' War was not so much a single conflict as a series of

conflicts, which ultimately involved nearly all western Europe. It began

in Bohemia, where Protestantism had not been extinguished by the Hussite

wars. [37] The Bohemian nobles, many of whom were Calvinists, revolted

against Hapsburg rule and proclaimed the independence of Bohemia. The

German Lutherans gave them no aid, however, and the emperor, Ferdinand II,

easily put down the insurrection. Many thousands of Protestants were now

driven into exile. Those who remained in Bohemia were obliged to accept

Roman Catholicism. Thus one more country was lost to Protestantism.

DANISH INTERVENTION

The failure of the Bohemian revolt aroused the greatest alarm in Germany.

Ferdinand threatened to follow in the footsteps of Charles V and to crush

Protestantism in the land of its birth. When, therefore, the king of

Denmark, who as duke of Holstein had great interest in German affairs,

decided to intervene, both Lutherans and Calvinists supported him. But

Wallenstein, the emperor's able general, proved more than a match for the

Danish king, who at length withdrew from the contest.

EDICT OF RESTITUTION, 1692 A.D.

So far the Roman Catholic and imperial party had triumphed. Ferdinand's

success led him to issue the Edict of Restitution, which compelled the

Protestants to restore all the Church property which they had taken since

the Peace of Augsburg. The enforcement of the edict brought about renewed

resistance on the part of the Protestants.

GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS AND THE INTERVENTION OF SWEDEN

There now appeared the single heroic figure on the stage of the Thirty

Years' War. This was Gustavus Adolphus, king of Sweden, and a man of

military genius. He had the deepest sympathy for his fellow-Protestants in

Germany and regarded himself as their divinely appointed deliverer. By

taking part in the war Gustavus also hoped to conquer the coast of

northern Germany. The Baltic would then become a Swedish lake, for Sweden

already possessed Finland and what are now the Russian provinces on the

Baltic.

[Illustration: GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS

After the portrait by the Flemish artist, Sir Anthony Van Dyck.]

GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS IN GERMANY, 1630-1632 A.D.

Gustavus entered Germany with a strong force of disciplined soldiers and

tried to form alliances with the Protestant princes. They received him

coolly at first, for the Swedish king seemed to them only a foreign

invader. Just at this time the imperialists captured Magdeburg, the

largest and most prosperous city in northern Germany. At least twenty

thousand of the inhabitants perished miserably amid the smoking ruins of

their homes. This massacre turned Protestant sentiment toward Gustavus as

the "Lion of the North" who had come to preserve Germany from destruction.

With the help of his allies Gustavus reconquered most of Germany for the

Protestants, but he fell at the battle of Lützen in the moment of victory.

His work, however, was done. The Swedish king had saved the cause of

Protestantism in Germany.

RICHELIEU AND THE INTERVENTION OF FRANCE

After the death of Gustavus the war assumed more and more a political

character. The German Protestants found an ally, strangely enough, in

Cardinal Richelieu, the all-powerful minister of the French king.

Richelieu entered the struggle in order to humble the Austrian Hapsburgs

and extend the boundaries of France toward the Rhine, at the expense of

the Holy Roman Empire. Since the Spanish Hapsburgs were aiding their

Austrian kinsmen, Richelieu naturally fought against Spain also. The war

thus became a great international conflict in which religion played only a

minor part. The Holy Roman Emperor had to yield at last and consented to

the treaties of peace signed at two cities in the province of Westphalia.

[Illustration: Map, EUROPE at the End of the Thirty Years' War, 1648 A.D.]

PEACE OF WESTPHALIA, 1648 A.D.

The Peace of Westphalia ended the long series of wars which followed the

Reformation. It practically settled the religious question, for it allowed

Calvinists in Germany to enjoy the same privileges as Lutherans and also

withdrew the Edict of Restitution. Nothing was said in the treaties about

liberty of conscience, but from this time the idea that religious

differences should be settled by force gradually passed away from the

minds of men.

TERRITORIAL READJUSTMENTS

The political clauses of the peace were numerous. France received nearly

all of Alsace along the Rhine. Sweden gained possessions in North Germany.

Brandenburg--the future kingdom of Prussia--secured additional territory

on the Baltic Sea. The independence of Switzerland [38] and of the United

Netherlands [39] was also recognized.

DISRUPTION OF GERMANY

The Peace of Westphalia left Germany more divided than ever. Each one of

the larger states was free to coin money, raise armies, make war, and

negotiate treaties without consulting the emperor. In fact, the Holy Roman

Empire had become a mere phantom. The Hapsburgs from now on devoted

themselves to their Austrian dominions, which included more Magyars and

Slavs than Germans. The failure of the Hapsburgs in the Thirty Years' War

long postponed the unification of Germany.

EXHAUSTION OF GERMANY

During the Thirty Years' War Germany had seen most of the fighting. She

suffered from it to the point of exhaustion. The population dwindled from

about sixteen million to one-half, or, as some believe, to one-third that

number. The loss of life was partly due to the fearful epidemics, such as

typhus fever and the bubonic plague, which spread over the land in the

wake of the invading armies. Hundreds of villages were destroyed or were

abandoned by their inhabitants. Much of the soil went out of cultivation,

while trade and manufacturing nearly disappeared. Added to all this was

the decline of education, literature, and art, and the brutalizing of the

people in mind and morals. It took Germany at least one hundred years to

recover from the injury inflicted by the Thirty Years' War; complete

recovery, indeed, came only in the nineteenth century.

RISE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

The savagery displayed by all participants in the Thirty Years' War could

not but impress thinking men with the necessity of formulating rules to

protect noncombatants, to care for prisoners, and to do away with pillage

and massacre. The worst horrors of the war had not taken place, before a

Dutch jurist, named Hugo Grotius, published at Paris in 1625 A.D. a work

_On the Laws of War and Peace_. It may be said to have founded

international law. The success of the book was remarkable. Gustavus

Adolphus carried a copy about with him during his campaigns, and its

leading doctrines were recognized and acted upon in the Peace of

Westphalia.

THE EUROPEAN STATE SYSTEM

The great principle on which Grotius based his recommendations was the

independence of sovereign states. He gave up the medieval conception of a

temporal and spiritual head of Christendom. The nations now recognized no

common superior, whether emperor or pope, but all were equal in the sight

of international law. The book of Grotius thus marked the profound change

which had come over Europe since the Middle Ages.

STUDIES

1. On an outline map indicate the European countries ruled by Charles V.

2. On an outline map indicate the principal territorial changes made by

the Peace of Westphalia.

3. Identify the following dates: 1648 A.D.; 1519 A.D.; 1517 A.D.; 1588

A.D.; 1598 A.D.; and 1555 A.D.

4. Locate the following places: Avignon; Constance; Augsburg; Zurich;

Worms; Magdeburg; and Utrecht.

5. For what were the following persons noted: Cardinal Wolsey; Admiral de

Coligny; Duke of Alva; Richelieu; St. Ignatius Loyola; Boniface VIII;

Frederick the Wise; Gustavus Adolphus; and Mary Queen of Scots?

6. Compare the scene at Anagni with the scene at Canossa.

7. On the map, page 646, trace the geographical extent of the "Great

Schism."

8. Name three important reasons for the lessened influence of the Roman

Church at the opening of the sixteenth century.

9. Explain the difference between heresy and schism.

10. Why has Wycliffe been called the "morning star of the Reformation"?

11. Compare Luther's work in fixing the form of the German language with

Dante's service to Italian through the _Divine Comedy_.

12. What is the origin of the name "Protestant"?

13. Why was Mary naturally a Catholic and Elizabeth naturally a

Protestant?

14. On the map, page 663, trace the geographical extent of the Reformation

in the sixteenth century.

15. Why did the reformers in each country take special pains to translate

the Bible into the vernacular?

16. What is the chief difference in mode of government between

Presbyterian and Congregational churches?

17. "The heroes of the Reformation, judged by modern standards, were

reactionaries." What does this statement mean?

18. Why is the Council of Trent generally considered the most important

church council since that of Nicaea?

19. Mention some differences between the Society of Jesus and earlier

monastic orders.

20. Compare the Edict of Nantes with the Peace of Augsburg.

21. Show how political, as well as religious, motives affected the revolt

of the Netherlands, the Huguenot wars, and the Thirty Years' War.

22. Compare the effects of the Thirty Years' War on Germany with the

effects of the Hundred Years' War on France.

23. What would you say of Holbein's success as a portrait painter

(illustrations pages 651, 658)?

FOOTNOTES

[1] Webster, _Readings in Medieval and Modern History_, chapter xxiii,

"Martin Luther and the Beginning of the Reformation"; chapter xxiv,

"England in the Age of Elizabeth."

[2] See page 514.

[3] See page 591.

[4] _Purgatorio_, xx, 88-90.

[5] See pages 36-37.

[6] See page 594.

[7] See page 600.

[8] See page 344.

[9] See page 641.

[10] See page 468.

[11] See page 611.

[12] See page 455.

[13] See page 441.

[14] See page 443.

[15] His hymn _Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott_ ("A mighty fortress is our

God") has been called "the Marseillaise of the Reformation."

[16] See page 527.

[17] See page 518.

[18] See page 453.

[19] See page 613.

[20] Churches governed by assemblies of presbyters were called

Presbyterian; those which allowed each congregation to rule itself were

called Congregational.

[21] In 1773 A.D. the pope suppressed the society, on the ground that it

had outgrown its usefulness. It was revived in many European countries

during the nineteenth century.

[22] Until the Vatican Council, held at Rome in 1869-1870 A D.

[23] See page 572.

[24] See page 440.

[25] See page 656.

[26] See page 677.

[27] See pages 550-552.

[28] See page 511, note 1.

[29] See page 639.

[30] Armada was a Spanish name for any armed fleet.

[31] See page 519.

[32] See page 634.

[33] The origin of the name is not known with certainty.

[34] Navarre originally formed a small kingdom on both sides of the

Pyrenees. The part south of these mountains was acquired by Spain in 1513

A.D. See the map on page 521.

[35] See page 235.

[36] See page 656.

[37] See page 650.

[38] See page 524, note 1.

[39] See page 674.

Early European History · 第 27 / 28 章