THE PHILOSOPHY OF FOREIGN TRAVEL

Foreign travel is one of the most useful branches of our education, but,

like a great many other useful branches, it appears to be "gone through

with" by many persons merely as a matter of course. It is astonishing

how few people out of the great number constantly making the tour of

Europe really carry home any thing to show for it except photographs and

laces. Foreign travel ought to rub the corners off a man's character,

and give him a polish such as "home-keeping youth" can never acquire;

yet how many we see who seem to have increased their natural rudeness

and inconsiderateness by a continental trip! Foreign travel ought to

soften prejudices, religious or political, and liberalize a man's mind;

but how many there are who seem to have travelled for the purpose of

getting up their rancour against all that is opposed to their notions,

making themselves illustrations of Tom Hood's remark, that "some minds

resemble copper wire or brass, and get the narrower by going farther."

Foreign travel, while it shows a man more clearly the faults of his own

country, ought to make him love his country more dearly than before; yet

how often does it have the effect of making a man undervalue his home

and his old friends! There must be some general reason why foreign

travel produces its legitimate fruits in so few instances; and I have,

during several European tours, endeavoured to ascertain it. I am

inclined to think that it is a general lack of preparation for travel,

and a mistaken notion that "sight-seeing" is the chief end of

travelling. The expenses of the passage across the Atlantic are

diminishing every year, and when the motive power in electricity is

discovered and applied, the expense of the trip will be a mere trifle;

and in view of these considerations, I feel that, though I might find a

more entertaining subject for a letter, I cannot find a more instructive

one than the philosophy of European travel.

Concerning the expense of foreign travel, there are many erroneous

notions afloat. There are hundreds of persons in America--artists, and

students, and persons of small means--who are held back from what is to

them a land of promise, by the mistaken idea that it is expensive to

travel in Europe. They know that Bayard Taylor made a tour on an

incredibly small sum, and they think that they have not his tact in

management, nor his self-denial in regard to the common wants of life;

but if they will put aside a few of their false American prejudices,

they will find that they can travel in Europe almost as cheaply as they

can live at home. In America, we have an aristocracy of the pocket,

which is far more tyrannical, and much less respectable, than any

aristocracy of blood on this side of the water; for every man feels an

instinctive respect for another who can trace his lineage back to some

brave soldier whose deeds have shone in his country's history for

centuries; but it requires a peculiarly constituted mind to bow down to

a man whose chief claim to respect is founded in the fact of his having

made a large fortune in the pork or dry goods line. Jinkins is a rich

man; he lives in style, and fares sumptuously every day. Jones is one of

Jinkins's neighbours; he is not so rich as Jinkins, but he feels a

natural ambition to keep up with him in his establishment, and he does

so; the rivalry becomes contagious, and the consequence is, that a score

of well-meaning people find, to their dismay, at the end of the year,

that they have been living beyond their means. Now, if people wish to

travel reasonably in Europe, the first thing that they must do is to get

rid of the Jones and Jinkins standard of respectability. I have seen

many people who were content to live at home in a very moderate sort of

way, who, when they came to travel, seemed to require all the style and

luxury of a foreign prince. Such people may go all over Europe, and see

very little of it except the merest outside crust. They might just as

well live in a fashionable hotel in America, and visit Mr. Sattler's

cosmoramas. They resemble those unfortunate persons who have studied the

classics from Anthon's text-books--they have got a general notion, but

of the mental discipline of the study they are entirely ignorant. But

let me go into particulars concerning the expenses of travelling. I know

that a person can go by a sailing vessel from Boston to Genoa, spend a

week or more in Genoa and on the road to Florence, pass two or three

weeks in that delightful city, and two months in Rome, then come to

Paris, and stay here two or three weeks, then go to London for a month

or more, and home by way of Liverpool in a steamer, for less than four

hundred dollars; for I did it myself several years ago. During this

trip, I lived and travelled respectably all the time--that is, what is

called respectably in Europe. I went in the second class cars, and in

the forward cabins of the steamers. Jones and Jinkins went in the first

class cars and in the after cabins, and paid a good deal more money for

the same pleasure that cost me so little. I know, too, that a person can

sail from Boston to Liverpool, make a summer trip of two months and a

half to Paris, _via_ London and the cities of Belgium, and back to

Boston _via_ London and Liverpool, for a trifle over two hundred and

fifty dollars. A good room in London can be got for two dollars and a

half a week, in Paris for eight dollars a month, in Rome and Florence

for four dollars a month, and in the cities of Germany for very

considerably less. And a good dinner costs about thirty cents in London,

thirty-five in Paris, fifteen to twenty-five in Florence or Rome, and

even less in Germany. Breakfast, which is made very little of on the

continent, generally damages one's exchequer to the extent of five to

ten cents. It will be seen from this scale of prices that one can live

very cheaply if he will; and, as the inhabitants of a country may be

supposed to know the requirements of its climate better than strangers,

common sense would dictate the adoption of their style of living.

I need not say that some knowledge of the French language is absolutely

indispensable to one who would travel with any satisfaction in Europe.

This is the most important general preparation that can be made for

going abroad. Next after it, I should place a review of the history of

the countries about to be visited. The outlines of the history of the

different countries of Europe, published by the English _Society for the

Diffusion of Useful Knowledge_, are admirably adapted to this purpose.

This gives a reality to the scenes you are about to visit that they

would not otherwise possess; it peoples the very roadside for you with

heroes. And not only does it impart a reality to your travels, but

history itself becomes a reality to you, instead of being a mere barren

record of events, hard to be remembered. At this time, when the neglect

of classical studies is apparent in almost every book, newspaper, and

magazine, I am afraid that I shall be thought somewhat old-fashioned and

out of date, if I say that some acquaintance with the Latin classics is

necessary before a man can really enjoy Italy. Yet it is so; and it will

be a great satisfaction to any man to find that Horace and Virgil, and

Cicero and Livy, are something more than the hard tasks of childhood.

Should a man's classical studies, however, be weak, the deficiency can

be made up in some measure by the judicious use of translations, and by

Eustace's Classical Tour. Murray's admirable hand-books of course will

supply a vast amount of information; but it will not do to trust to

reading them upon the spot. Some preparation must be made

beforehand,--some capital is necessary to start in business. "If you

would bring home the wealth of the Indies, you must carry out the wealth

of the Indies." It would be well, too, for a person about to visit

Europe to prepare himself for a quieter life than he has been leading at

home. I mean, to tone himself down so as to be able to enjoy the freedom

from excitement which awaits him here. It is now more than a year since

I left America, and likewise more than a year since I have seen any

disorderly conduct, or a quarrel, or even have heard high words between

two parties in the street, or have known of an alarm of fire. In the

course of the year, too, I have not seen half a dozen intoxicated

persons. When we reflect what a fruitful source of excitement all these

things are in America, it will be easy to see that a man may have,

comparatively, a very quiet life where they are not to be found. It will

not do any harm, either, to prepare one's self by assuming a little more

consideration for the feelings of others than is generally seen among

us, and by learning to address servants with a little less of the

imperious manner which is so common in America. Strange as it may seem,

there is much less distinction of classes on the continent, than in

republican America. You are astonished to find the broadcloth coat and

the blouse interchanging the civilities of a "light" in the streets, and

the easy, familiar way of servants towards their masters is a source of

great surprise. You seldom see a Frenchman or an Italian receive any

thing from a servant without thanking him for it. Yet there appears to

be a perfectly good understanding between all parties as to their

relative position, and with all their familiarity, I have never seen a

servant presume upon the good nature of his employer, as they often do

with us. We receive our social habits in a great measure from England,

and therefore we have got that hard old English way of treating

servants, as if our object was to make them feel that they are

inferiors. So the sooner a man who is going to travel on the continent,

can get that notion out of his head, and replace it with the continental

one, which seems to be, that a servant, so long as he is faithful in the

discharge of his duties, is quite as respectable a member of society as

his employer, the better it will be for him, and the pleasanter will be

his sojourn in Europe.

One of the first mistakes Americans generally make in leaving for Europe

is, to take too much luggage. Presupposing a sufficiency of

under-clothing, all that any person really needs is a good, substantial

travelling suit, and a suit of black, including a black dress coat,

which is indispensable for all occasions of ceremony. The Sistine Chapel

is closed to frock coats, and so is the Opera--and as for evening

parties, a man might as well go in a roundabout as in any thing but a

dress coat. Clothing is at least one third cheaper in Europe than it is

with us, and any deficiency can be supplied with ease, without carrying

a large wardrobe around with one, and paying the charges for extra

luggage exacted by the continental railways.

Let us now suppose a person to have got fairly off, having read up his

classics and his history, and got his luggage into a single good-sized

valise,--let us suppose him to have got over the few days of

seasickness, which made him wish that Europe had been submerged by the

broad ocean (as Mr. Choate would say) or ever he had left his native

land,--and to have passed those few pleasant days, which every one

remembers in his Atlantic passage, when the ship was literally getting

along "by degrees" on her course,--and to have arrived safely in some

European port. The custom house officers commence the examination of the

luggage, looking especially for tobacco; and if our friend is a wise

man, he will not attempt to bribe the officers, as in nine cases out of

ten he will increase his difficulties by so doing, and cause his effects

to be examined with double care; but he will open his trunk, and, if he

have any cigars, will show them to the examiner, and if he have not, he

will undoubtedly be told to close it again, and will soon be on his way

to his hotel. I suppose him to have selected a hotel before arriving in

port--which would be done by carefully avoiding those houses which make

a great show, or are highly commended in Murray's guide-books. He will

find a neat, quiet European hotel a delightful place, after the gilding

and red velvet of the great caravanseries of his native country. If he

is going to stop more than a single night, he will ask the price of the

room to which he is shown, and if it seems too expensive, will look

until he finds one that suits him. When he has selected a room, and his

valise has been brought up, he will probably observe that the servant

(if it is evening) has lighted both of the candles on the mantel-piece.

He will immediately blow one of them out and hand it to the waiter, with

a look that will show him that he is dealing with an experienced

traveller, who knows that he has to pay for candles as he burns them.

When he leaves the hotel, he will make it a principle always to carry

the unconsumed candle or candles with him, for use as occasion may

require; for it is the custom of the country, and will secure him

against the little impositions which are always considered fair play

upon outsiders. It is possible that he will find, when he goes to wash

his hands, that there is no soap in the wash stand, and will thank me

for having reminded him to carry a cake with him rolled up in a bit of

oiled silk. When he wishes to take lodgings in any city, he will be

particular to avoid that part of the town where English people mostly do

inhabit, and will be very shy of houses where apartments to let are

advertised on a placard in phrases which the originator probably

intended for English. He will look thoroughly before he decides, and so

will save himself a great deal of dissatisfaction which he might feel on

finding afterwards that others had done much better than he. Besides,

"room-hunting" is not the least profitable, nor least amusing part of a

traveller's experience. He will, when settled in his rooms, attend in

person to the purchase of his candles and his fuel, and to the delivery

of the same in his apartments; for by so doing he will save money, and

will see more of the common people of the place.

Of course he will see all the "sights" that every stranger is under a

sort of moral obligation to see, however much it may fatigue him; but he

must not stop there. He must not think, as so many appear to, that, when

he has seen the palaces, and picture galleries, and gardens, and public

monuments of a country, he knows that country. He must try to see and

know as much as he can of the people of the country, for they (Louis

Quatorze to the contrary, notwithstanding) are the state. Let him

cultivate the habit of early rising, and frequent market places and old

parish churches in the twilight of the morning, and he will learn more

of the people in one month than a year of reading or ordinary

sight-seeing could teach him. Let him choose back alleys, instead of

crowded and fashionable thoroughfares for his walks; when he falls in

with a wandering musician and juggler, exhibiting in public, let him

stop, not to see the exhibition, but the spectators; when he goes to the

theatre, let him not shut himself up in the privacy of a box, but go

into the pit, where all he will see and hear around him will be full as

amusing as the performance itself; and when he uses an omnibus, let him

always choose a seat by the driver, in preference to one inside. I have

learnt more of the religious character of the poorer class in Paris, by

a visit to a little out-of-the-way church at sunrise, than could be

acquired by hours of conversation with the people themselves. And I have

learned equally as much of the brutality and degradation of the same

class in England, by going into a gin-shop late at night, calling for a

glass of ale, and drinking it slowly, while I was inspecting the

company. There is many a man who travels through Europe, communicating

only with hotel keepers, couriers, and ciceroni, and learning less of

the people than he could by walking into a market-place alone, and

buying a sixpence worth of fruit. Yet such men presume to write books,

and treat not merely of the governments of these countries, but of the

social condition of the people! I once met a man in Italy, who could not

order his breakfast correctly in Italian, who knew only one Italian, and

he was the waiter who served him in a restaurant; and yet this man was a

correspondent of a respectable paper in Boston, and had the effrontery

to write column after column upon Italian social life, and to speak of

political affairs as if he were Cardinal Antonelli's sole confidant.

There are such people here in Paris now, who send over to America,

weekly, batches of falsehood about the household of the Tuileries, which

the intelligent public of America accepts as being true; for it seems to

be a part of some people's republicanism to believe nothing but evil of

a ruler who wears a crown. I need not say in this connection, that the

traveller who wishes to enjoy Europe must put away the habit (if he be

so unfortunate as to have it) of looking upon every thing through the

green spectacles of republicanism, and regarding that form of government

as the only one calculated to benefit mankind. He must remember that the

government of his own country is a mere experiment, compared with the

old monarchies of Europe, and he must try to judge impartially between

them. He must judge each system by its results, and if on comparison he

finds that there is really less slavery in his own country than in

Europe; that the government is administered more impartially; that the

judiciary is purer; that there is less of mob law and violence, and less

of political bargaining and trickery, and that life and property are

more secure in his own country than they are here,--why, he will return

to America a better republican than before, from the very fact of having

done justice to the governments of Europe.

As I have before said, it is better for a traveller to endeavour to live

as nearly as possible in the manner of the inhabitants of the country in

which he is sojourning. I do not mean that he should feel bound to make

as general a use of garlic as some of the people of Europe do, for in

some places I verily believe that a custard or a blanc mange would be

thought imperfect if they were not seasoned with that savory vegetable;

but, _ceteris_ being _paribus_, if the general manner of living were

followed, the traveller would find it conducive to health and to

economy. The habits of life among every people are not founded on a mere

caprice; and experience proves that under the warm sun of Italy, a light

vegetable diet is healthier and more really invigorating than all the

roast beef of Old England would be.

In Europe, no man is ever ashamed of economy. Few Englishmen even shrink

from acknowledging that they cannot afford to do this or that, and on

the continent profuseness in the use of money is considered the sure

mark of a _parvenu_. Every man is free to do as he pleases; he can

travel in the first, second, or third class on the railways, and not

excite the surprise of any body; and whatever class he may be in, he

will be treated with equal respect by all. It is well to bear this in

mind, for, taken in connection with the principle of paying for one's

room and meals separately according to what one has, it puts it within

one's power to travel all over Europe for a ridiculously small sum. You

can live in Paris, by going over into the Latin quarter, on thirty cents

a day, and be treated by every body, except your own countrymen, with as

much consideration as if you abode among the mirrors and gilding of the

Hotel de Louvre. Not that I would advise any one to go over there for

the sake of saving money, and live on salads and meats in which it is

difficult to have confidence, when he can afford to do better. I only

wish to encourage those who are kept from visiting Europe by the idea

that it requires a great outlay of money. You can live in Europe for

just what you choose to spend, and in a style of independence to which

America is a total stranger. Every body does not know here what every

body else has for dinner. You may live on the same floor with a man for

months and years, and not know any more of him than can be learned from

a semi-occasional meeting on the staircase, and an interchange of hat

civilities. This seems so common to a Frenchman, that it would be

considered by him hardly worth notice; but to any one who knows what a

sharp look-out neighbours keep over each other in America, it is a most

pleasing phenomenon. It is indeed a delightful thing to live among

people who have formed a habit of minding their own business, and at the

same time have a spirit of consideration for the rights and feelings of

their neighbours.

If, in the above hints concerning the way to travel pleasantly and

cheaply in Europe, I have succeeded in removing any of the bugbear

obstacles which hold back so many from the great advantages they might

here enjoy, I shall feel that I have not tasked my poor eyes and brain

for nothing. We are a long way behind Europe in many things, and it is

only by frequent communication that we can make up our deficiencies. It

cannot be done by boasting, nor by claiming for America all the

enterprise and enlightenment of the nineteenth century. Neither can it

be done by setting up the United States as superior to every historical

precedent, and an exception to every rule. Most men (as the old French

writer says) are mortal; and we Americans shall find that our country,

with all its prosperity and unequalled progress, is subject to the same

vicissitudes as the countries we now think we can afford to despise; and

that our history is

"----but the same rehearsal of the past--

First Freedom, and then Glory; when that fails,

Wealth, vice, corruption,--barbarism at last."

No, we cannot safely scorn the lesson which Europe teaches us; for if we

do, we shall have to learn it at the expense of much adversity and

wounding of our pride. Every American who comes abroad, if he knows how

to travel, ought to carry home with him a new idea of the amenities of

life, and of moderation in the pursuit and the use of wealth, such as

will make itself felt in the course of time, and make the fast living

and recklessness of authority and tendency to bankruptcy of the present

day, give way to a spirit of moderation and obedience to law such as

always produces private prosperity and public stability.

My Unknown Chum: "Aguecheek" · 第 17 / 33 题