RESOURCES OF THE SOUTH.

In the spring of 1860, a passenger left Massachusetts for the sunny

South. As he passed slowly down to the Battery to embark from New York,

the sun shone brightly on acres of drays awaiting their turn to approach

the Southern steamers. Some of them had waited patiently from early morn

for an opportunity to discharge, and it was a current rumor that twenty

dollars had been paid for a chance to reach the steamers. The previous

season had been a good one, and Cotton wore its robes of royalty.

Southern credit stood at the highest point, while the West was out of

favor; and doubtless many of the keen traders of the South, having some

inkling of coming events, were preparing for future emergencies.

In the spring of 1860, the South was literally overrun with goods. Some

sixteen powerful steamers were running between Savannah and New York; an

equal number were on the line to Charleston; steamers and flat-boats in

countless numbers were bearing down the Mississippi their tribute of

flour, lard, and corn. The Northern and Western merchants were counting

down their money for rice, cotton, and sugar, and giving long credits on

the produce of the North and West.

Before hostilities began, the South was allowed to supply itself freely

with powder and arms, and for months after they had begun, large

supplies of fire-arms were drawn through Kentucky. Down to a recent

period the South has continued to receive supplies from Missouri,

Virginia, and Tennessee. With these resources, and with a capital drawn

from a debt of two hundred millions to the North and West, it has been

able to support, for the first fifteen months at least, three hundred

thousand men in the field, and successfully to resist, in some cases,

the advance of the Federal Army. While these resources lasted, while the

blockade was ineffective, while the Confederacy could produce men to

replace all who fell, while a paper currency and scrip could be floated,

and while the nation hesitated to put forth its strength, the South was

able to maintain a strong front, although driven successively from

Maryland, Missouri, Kentucky, Western Virginia, and Tennessee, and thus

deprived of nearly half the population and resources on which it

originally relied.

The enlarged canal of New York, and the great railways which furnish

direct routes from the West to the Atlantic, have of late years diverted

from the Father of Waters a very large proportion of the exports of the

West, but the steamers and flat-boats which floated down the Mississippi

literally fed the Cotton States. Laden with corn, flour, and lard, with

ploughs, glass, and nails, with horses and mules, and live stock of

every description, they distributed their cargoes from Memphis to New

Orleans, and came back freighted with sugar and cotton.

At length this great commerce has been interrupted, and the South, cut

off from this almost indispensable supply of the necessaries of life, is

now struggling for existence, and diverts its negroes from the

remunerative culture of sugar and cotton to the cultivation of grain and

corn.

There are few at the North who appreciate the sacrifice which attends

this diversion, or the extent of the pressure which led to this

disastrous change.

In Illinois, Iowa, or Indiana, the farmer can grow rich while selling

his corn for ten cents per bushel, and it is now common for a man and a

boy to cultivate a hundred acres and to gather five thousand bushels in

a single season. The South does not possess the rich and exhaustless

soil of the prairies, which for half a century will yield without return

successive and luxuriant crops of corn. Its soil is generally light and

easily exhausted, and is tilled by the rude and unwilling labor of the

slave. The census apprises us that its average crop of corn is but

fifteen bushels to the acre, in place of fifty to sixty in Illinois, and

even this depends in part on guano or artificial stimulants. The average

yield of wheat south of Tennessee is but six bushels to the acre, in

place of twenty to forty in Ohio. The Southern planters, who can sell

cotton with profit at ten cents per pound, cannot produce corn for less

than one dollar per bushel, or tenfold the cost in the West, and in past

years a dollar has been the customary price from North Carolina to

Texas.

Before the war, the cotton-crop of the South had risen to five millions

of bales; but now four-fifths of the land in cultivation is devoted to

corn and grain. In place of five millions of bales, worth at former

prices two hundred millions of dollars, and at present rates at least

eight hundred millions, the South, in its folly, to the injury of the

world, and the ruin of most of its planters, is now producing, in place

of its cotton, less corn than could be furnished in Illinois in ordinary

seasons for twenty millions of dollars. But even this is inadequate to

the wants of its people and its stock. Its small farmers are diverted

from the cultivation of the soil. The conscript-law is drafting all the

able-bodied white men into the army.

The States from Tennessee and North Carolina to Texas have neither

pasture nor mowing; their feeble stock gains but a precarious livelihood

from the cane-brakes or weeds of the forests and Northern hay. Corn and

grain were transported by railway more than three hundred miles into the

interior. The writer has stood beside a yoke of Georgia oxen in Atlanta

so small that they might well pass for calves at the North. Two Illinois

steers would weigh down a half-dozen such animals. But, diminutive as

they are, they, as well as the people of the South, require Northern

supplies. And at this moment their last dependence is placed upon the

valley of Virginia and the valleys of East Tennessee. Let us hope that

the Union armies which now possess Nashville, Memphis, and Cumberland

Gap may soon occupy Knoxville.

In the language of the "Richmond Examiner," "the possession of the lead,

copper, and salt mines, and the pork, corn, and hay-crop of these

countries, Eastern Tennessee and Western Virginia, is now vital to the

existence of the Confederacy. This section of the country is the

keystone of the Southern arch. It is now in great peril, as is the great

artery through which the life-blood of the South now circulates. Whether

the East Tennessee and Virginia railroad is to be surrendered, whether

the only adequate supply of salt is to be lost, whether the only

hay-crop of the South is to be surrendered, are questions of vast and

pressing importance."

The wall of fire to which allusion has sometimes been made in debate is

now closing in around the Southern Confederacy. The Mississippi is

closed. But a single point of contact, at Vicksburg, remains between the

States west of the Mississippi and the Atlantic States. Texas is

insulated. The blockade is daily becoming more stringent upon the

seaboard. One effort more, soon to be made, must sever the rich valleys,

mines, and furnaces of Tennessee from the cotton districts, and the

exhaustion of supplies of every description will soon become more and

more apparent.

It is undoubtedly true that an occasional cargo escapes the blockade,

that a few boat-loads of supplies are ferried by treason at the midnight

hour across the Chesapeake, and sold at extravagant prices; but what

does this amount to? What a contrast this trade presents to the millions

of tons which used to reach the South from the Free States and Europe

before it was crushed by the rebellion! And what a contrast does it

present to-day to the commerce of the North,--to the barks and

propellers which float down the Lakes deeply laden with grain,--to the

weekly exports of New York, (twelve millions for the last three

weeks,)--to its vast income from duties,--to the ships of the North

visiting every ocean, earning more freight than for years past, although

deprived of the carrying-trade of the South, and contending successfully

with the marine of Great Britain for the supremacy on the ocean! How

signal has thus far been the failure of the Southern prophecies made

before the outbreak!

New York, we were told, was dependent on Southern commerce, and was to

be ruined by the war; there were to be riots in the streets, and its

palaces were to fall in ruins: but the riots and the ruins are to be

found only in Southern latitudes.

The manufacturers of Massachusetts were to be broken down: but the

woollen trade and the shoe-trade have received a new impetus,--are

highly prosperous; and the cotton-spinners, with more than a year's

supply of cotton, have by the rise of prices enjoyed a profit

unprecedented. Having used their cotton with moderation, they have at

the close of each six months seen their stocks of raw material and

goods, by the rise of prices, undiminished in value, and blessed like

the widow's cruse of oil. Nearly all have paid large dividends, many

have earned dividends for the year to come, and are now sending their

male operatives to the war, and their females to their rural homes,

where they expect to perform some of the duties of brothers who have

volunteered for the war. The ruin predicted falls not upon the spinner,

but upon the authors of Secession.

Let us glance for a moment at the present condition of the South.

General Butler found at New Orleans proof of its exhaustion in the

prices of food,--with corn, for instance, at three dollars per bushel,

flour twenty to thirty dollars per barrel, and hay at one hundred

dollars per ton.

If we pass on to Mobile, we hear of similar prices, and learn that not a

carpet can be found on the floor of any resident: they have all been cut

into blankets for the army. White curtains and drapery have been

converted into shirts; for cotton cloth cannot be had for a dollar a

yard.

As we come on toward the North, we find the shops of Savannah nearly

empty, with shoes and boots quoted at thirty dollars per pair. At such

rates, what must it cost to put an army in condition to move?

At Charleston, the stores which two years since were overflowing with

merchandise, and the daily recipients, of entire cargoes, are utterly

empty; and when we reach Richmond, we see sugar quoted at three-fourths

of a dollar, coffee at two dollars, and tea at sixteen dollars per

pound, broadcloth at fifty dollars per yard, while whiskey, worth at

Cincinnati twenty cents per gallon, commands at Richmond six dollars.

Such is the condition of affairs, while the South still has access to

Virginia and East Tennessee, and after it has received a year's supply

of Northern productions for which no payment has been made.

Having thus pictured the physical resources of the enemy, let us inquire

what is the force which he can bring into the field, and his means of

maintaining it.

There is conclusive evidence that at no period during the war has the

Confederacy had more than three hundred and fifty thousand effective men

in the field, and it has no power to carry that number beyond four

hundred thousand. The population of the Union, by the census of 1860,

was thirty-two millions. At the usual rate of increase it now amounts to

thirty-four millions; of these, four millions are blacks, and of the

residue, twenty-six millions are in the loyal districts, and but four

millions in the Confederacy, if we exclude New Orleans and those

portions of Virginia and Tennessee which have been subdued by the

Federal arms.

In our Northern States the militia has rarely exceeded ten per cent. of

the population. At least one-half of the population is composed of

females; one-half of the residue is below the age of sixteen. If we

deduct from the remainder three-twentieths for those below eighteen,

those above forty-five, and those exempted by law or infirmity,

one-tenth alone will remain.

It is said that the Confederacy has called out all the white males

between sixteen and thirty-five, and proposes to summon all those

between thirty-five and fifty. If it does so, we may well expect such

forces to break down in heavy marches or suffer from exposure. But let

us assume that it can bring into the field fourteen per cent. of its

entire population--(and we must not forget that this is a high estimate,

as all the able-bodied men of Massachusetts are but twelve per cent. of

her population, or one hundred and fifty-five thousand): upon this

assumption, the effective force of the Confederacy at the start was but

five hundred and sixty thousand, and if to this we add forty thousand

more for volunteers and conscripts from Maryland, Missouri, Kentucky,

and East Tennessee, we have a capacity for six hundred thousand only. Of

these there has been a continual waste from the outset by sickness,

desertions, capture, and the casualties of war. The Union army has lost

at least one-third, and been reduced from six hundred thousand to four

hundred thousand by such depletion; and in the same ratio, the South,

with inferior supplies and stores, and with greater exposure, must have

lost at least an equal number.

In estimating its present capacity at four hundred thousand men, we

undoubtedly exceed the actual resources of the South. To meet this we

have at least four hundred thousand effective men now in the field, to

be increased to a million by the new levies, and soon to be aided by

thirty mail-clad steamers added to our present fleet on the ocean and

the Mississippi,--a naval force equivalent to at least two hundred

thousand more.

To sustain such forces in the field and on the water will doubtless tax

all the energies of the Union; but how is the inferior force of four

hundred thousand to be clad, fed, and paid by the exhausted Confederacy,

with a white population less than one-sixth of that opposed to them,

without commerce and the mechanic arts, and with no productive

agriculture?

The pecuniary resources of the South for carrying on this war have thus

far consisted principally of a paper currency and bonds, with a forced

circulation. It has drawn little from taxes or forfeiture, although it

has been aided by the appropriation of both public and private property

of the United States.

We have no record of the currency issued, but we know that both prices

and pay have been higher in Southern than in Northern armies; and if

with us it has cost a thousand dollars per annum to sustain a soldier in

the field, it has cost at that rate four hundred and sixty-seven

millions to maintain three hundred and fifty thousand men for the last

sixteen months in the Southern army, and of this at least four hundred

millions has been met by the issue of paper.

Such an issue would be equivalent to an issue of seven times that

amount, or of twenty-eight hundred millions, to be borne by the whites

who now recognize the Union. How long can the South continue to float

such a currency? Does it not already equal or exceed the paper currency

of our Revolution, which became utterly worthless, notwithstanding our

nation achieved its independence?

Our fathers, long before the surrender at Yorktown, resorted to specie,

to the bank of Morris, and to French and Dutch subsidies: but how is the

South to command bank-notes or specie, or to buy arms, powder, or

provisions, or to satisfy soldiers with a currency such as has been

described, or to make new issues at the rate of twenty-five millions per

month?

At Richmond, the capital of the Confederacy, gold ranges from 125 to 150

per cent. premium. Must not this advance require a double or triple

issue of currency, namely, fifty to seventy-five millions per month, to

accomplish as much as has already been effected? And how as has already

been effected? and how long can such a currency be floated within a

contracting circle, and in the face of our new levies and our unbounded

national credit? If the war should last another year, and this

depreciating currency can be floated at all, it is safe to infer from

the history of the past that the debt of the South must increase at

least one thousand millions. Under the pressure of such growing weight

its end may be safely predicted.

Thus far in the contest the South has possessed one great advantage. The

planter's son, reared to no profession, in a region where the pursuits

of trade and the mechanic arts have little honor, has been accustomed

from childhood to the use of the horse and rifle. In most of the towns

of the South you will find a military academy, and here the young cadet

has been trained to arms and qualified for office: we have no such class

in the Free States, except a few graduates from West Point. Under such

officers, a motley army has been collected, composed of foreigners who

have toiled in Southern cities as draymen and porters, of Northern

clerks driven by coercion or sheer necessity to enlist, the poor whites,

the outcasts of the South, a class the most degraded in public

estimate,--a class which has the respect of neither the white man nor

the negro. These people inhabit to a great extent the scrub-oak or

black-jack forests, the second growth which has sprung up on exhausted

plantations. Destitute of schools, churches, and newspapers, unable to

read or write, without culture, generally steeped in whiskey, their sole

property a cabin, and perhaps a few swine, which roam through the

forests, these Pariahs of society gain a precarious subsistence by

hunting, fishing, and occasional depredations upon the property of the

planters. During a brief visit to Columbia, in 1860, one of these

outcasts was arraigned before the Court of Sessions for stealing

black-jack from a plantation and selling it in the streets of Columbia;

and the judge in his flowing robes, while enlarging upon the offence,

facetiously remarked, that the prisoner had doubtless swallowed the

black-jack,--an allusion to the habits of the class which seemed well

understood by the bar.

The position of this class has thus far been improved by the war. In the

army the poor white has associated with the officer, far above him in

social life. His aid has been courted, he has received high wages in

Confederate notes, he has found better fare and clothing than he could

procure at home, and has been lured to the contest by the eloquent

appeals of the planter, by bitter attacks upon the North, and glowing

pictures of the ruin which the abolitionists would bring upon the South.

The Confederate notes have until recently proved sufficient for his

purposes, while other classes have supplied the means to prosecute the

war. But as the circle contracts and these notes prove worthless, food

and clothing, tobacco and whiskey will cease to be attainable; and when

the provost marshal has swept the plantation, and comes to the poor

man's cabin to take his last bushel of meal and to shoot down his swine

for the subsistence of the army, he will at length ask what he has to

gain from the further prosecution of the war.

When this crisis arrives, and it must be approaching, how can the

Southern army retain in its ranks either the poor white, the foreigner,

or the Northern clerk, whose sympathies have never been with the

Confederacy?

It may be said, that the Confederacy can continue the war by wealth

accumulated in former years. But that wealth vested in land, slaves, or

railways, now unproductive, or in banks whose funds have been advanced

to planters still under protest. This wealth will not suffice to

prosecute the war. Thus far it has been sustained by funds on hand, the

seizure of national forts, arms, and arsenals, by the appropriation of

debts due to Northern merchants, by supplies from Kentucky, Tennessee,

and Missouri, and by the issue of paper already greatly depreciated.

With these resources it has conducted a losing warfare while we were

creating an army and a navy, and during this contest has lost three of

the most important border States, nearly half of a fourth, several of

its chief seaports, nearly all its shipping, and the navigation of the

Mississippi.

But it may be urged, Has not McClellan retired from his intrenchments

before Richmond? Have we not fought with varying results successive

battles around Manassas? Are not our troops retiring to their old lines

before Washington? Have not the enemy again broken into Kentucky? and do

they not menace the banks of the Potomac and the Ohio? Let us concede

all this. Let us admit that our new levies are for the moment

inert,--that we are now marshalling, arming, and drilling our raw

recruits; let us concede that the giant of the North has not yet put

forth his energies,--that, although roused from his torpor, one of his

arms is still benumbed, and that his lithe and active opponent is for

the moment pommelling him on every side, and has a momentary advantage;

let us admit that our go-ahead nation is indignant at the idea of one

step backward in this great contest: still it is safe to predict that

within sixty days our new army of superior men will be ready to take the

field and advance upon the foe in overwhelming force,--that soon our

iron fleet will be ready to batter down the fortresses of Charleston,

Savannah, Mobile, Vicksburg, and Galveston, the last strongholds of the

enemy. And when his army of conscripts shall have wasted away, after

their last flurry and struggle, where is he to recruit or procure a new

army for resistance or offence? The South is now taking the field with

all its strength; but when that strength is broken, what power will

remain to confront the forces of the Union?

The South has driven to the war its whole white population able to bear

arms, and when that force is exhausted, at least two-thirds of the adult

males of the North and the whole black population will still remain to

sustain the Government, and births and emigration will soon fill the

vacuum.

Let us place at the helm men of character and tried activity,--men of

intelligence and forecast,--men who can appreciate the leaders of the

South, reckless alike of property, character, and life, and the result

cannot be doubtful.

The South is now commencing a new campaign, and is to confront a navy

hourly improving, and an invulnerable fleet, armed with cannon more

effective than any yet used in naval warfare. It is to encounter, with

conscripts, a million of hardy volunteers, and to do this with its

supplies reduced and its credit broken. It has but one reliance: a slave

population of four millions, competent to maintain themselves, but

incompetent to furnish to their masters a full supply of the coarsest

food. While it furnishes a scanty supply, while it toils in the

trenches, and feeds the horses of the cavalry, or drives the

army-wagons, it is still an element of strength to the masters, and the

question occurs, Shall the nation, now so severely taxed by the

slaveholder, and compelled to pour forth its best blood like water to

preserve its existence, remove this element of present and future

strength by liberating the slave?

Can the slaveholder claim the preservation of slavery, when he relies

upon it and uses it to aid him in destroying the Government? And if

one-half of the population of the South is ready to sustain the

Government, and to withdraw its aid from the foe, shall not the

loyalist, whether white or black, be accepted and allowed the privileges

of a citizen when he takes refuge under the national flag?

Can we expect future peace, unless we reduce to order lawless men,

unless we draw them from the war-path by making labor and the arts of

peace respected?

This is a momentous question which addresses itself to our nation at the

present juncture. There are some who imagine that the negro, if

liberated, would renew the scenes of San Domingo, and massacre the

people of the South. But such has not been the case in the French and

British Isles of the West Indies, although in those islands the

proportion of the white population is far below that at the South. In

the Cotton States the whites and the negroes are nearly equal in

numbers; and if, in Jamaica, Barbadoes, Santa Cruz, and Martinique, the

slaves, when liberated, have respected the rights of the masters, and

recognized their title to the land, and have submitted to toil for

moderate wages, where a handful of whites monopolized the soil, and

demanded for it prices far beyond the value of the slave and land

together, may we not well anticipate that the slave population, barely

equal in number to the white population, trained to submission in a

region where land is of little value, will, if liberated, continue to be

a quiet and peaceful population?

There are some who predict that the negroes, if emancipated, will

overrun the North and West. But why should they fly from the South to

the cold winters and less genial climate of the North or West? It is

servitude which degrades the negro; and if the stigma which he now bears

is removed, why should he not cling to the region in which he was born

and bred, and to which he is adapted by nature?

Should the institution of slavery survive the war into which we have

been plunged by its adherents and propagators, we might well fear that

our Northern and Western States would be overrun by the fugitives, who,

having escaped during the war, would be disposed to place distance

between themselves and their late masters, and to fly from the borders

of States which would not hesitate to reduce them again to servitude;

but if the institution itself should be terminated by the war, why

should the free man be a fugitive from his home?

Our Western States are desirous to perpetuate in its purity the

Anglo-Saxon blood, and would colonize the West with men raised under

free institutions. They shrink from all contact with a race of bondmen.

Our President, himself a Western man, proposes to colonize the free

negro in Central America, and thriving colonies already exist on the

coast of Africa. But why should we send from this country her millions

of laborers? Is our land exhausted? Is there no room for the negro in

the region where he lives? Has not the demand for sugar and cotton, for

naval stores and timber, overtaken the supply? and has not the frank and

truthful Mr. Spratt, of South Carolina, announced in the councils of

that State, that the South must import more savages from Africa, to

reclaim and improve its soil? Why, then, banish the well-trained laborer

now on the spot?

Does not history apprise us how Spain suffered in her agriculture, and

the arts of life declined, when the Moriscos were driven from her soil?

how Belgium, the garden of Europe, decayed when Spanish intolerance

banished to England the Protestant weavers and spinners, who laid the

foundation of English opulence? how France retrograded when superstition

exiled from her shores the industrious Huguenots? And are we to draw no

light from history? Would we, at this moment, when our cotton-mills are

closing their gates,--when the cotton-spinner of England appeals to the

British minister for intervention,--when the weaver of Rouen demands the

raw material of Louis Napoleon,--shall we, at a time when a single crop

of cotton is worth, at current prices, nearly a thousand millions, or

twice the debt contracted for the war,--impair our national strength by

destroying the sources of supply? At least one crop has been lost, and

this will for a term of years insure high prices. Are we to deprive our

nation of these prices, and of the freights which would attend the

shipments to Europe? Shall not cotton contribute to make good our

losses, and to the progress of the nation?

Why is colonization necessary?

There is a belt of territory, now sparsely populated, and inhabited

chiefly by negroes, extending from the Dismal Swamp to the Capes of

Florida, and from these Capes to the Brazos,--generally level, and free

from rocks and stones,--of the average width of nearly one hundred

miles,--its area at least two hundred millions of acres,--competent to

sustain forty millions of negroes, or ten times the number which now

exist within the United States. Here are vast forests, unctuous with

turpentine, annually producing pitch, tar, rosin, and ship-timber, with

material for houses, boats, fuel, and lightwood, while the mossy drapery

of the trees in suitable for pillows and cushions. Here is a soil which,

with proper cultivation, can produce rice, corn, cotton, tobacco, and

indigo, and is admirably adapted to the culture of the ground-nut and

sweet potato. Here are rivers and inlets abounding in fish and

shell-fish. Here is a climate, often fatal to the white, but suited to

the negro. Here are no harsh winters or chilling snows. Along the coast

we may rear black seamen for our Southern steamers,--cooks, stewards,

and mariners for our West India voyages.

Has not Nature designed a black fringe for this coast? Has not the

importation of the negro been designed by Providence to reclaim this

coast, and to give his progeny permanent and appropriate homes? And, to

use a favorite phrase of the South, does not Manifest Destiny point to

this consummation? and why should the negro be exiled from these shores?

Does he not cling like the white man to his native land? and are not his

tastes, wishes, and attachments to be consulted,--a question so

important to his race?

But it may be urged, that this is not public domain,--that it has been

already appropriated, and is now the property of the Southern planter.

But here is a public exigency, and the remedy should be proportioned to

the exigency. The right of eminent domain should be exercised by the

nation either directly after conquest, or through the States or

Territories it may establish. By that right, in England and in most of

our States, private property is taken for highways or railways. In New

York it is thus appropriated for markets, hospitals, and other public

purposes.

The land in question, if we deduct the sites of towns and villages and

cities, as should be done, will not average in value three dollars per

acre. Let it be valued at twice that price, and be charged with the

interest of that price as a ground-rent to be paid by the settler. And

if, in Barbadoes, the free negro has raised the value of land to three

hundred dollars per acre, surely on this coast he can prosper upon land

costing one-fiftieth part of the average price of that of Barbadoes.

If six dollars would not suffice, the land might be rated at an average

value of ten dollars, and the settler charged with a quit-rent of half a

dollar per acre, and allowed to convert his tenure into a fee-simple by

the payment of the principal. The planter whose land should be

appropriated would thus realize more than its value, and in great part

the value of his slaves,--while the negro would secure at once a settled

home, with an interest in the soil and the means of subsistence.

Is not this the true solution of the great problem?

If we can give to the negro a fixed tenure in the soil under the

tutelage of the nation, he will soon have every incentive to exertion.

With peace must come a continuous demand for all the produce of the

South,--for cotton, tobacco, timber, and naval stores,--in exchange for

which the negro would require at least threefold the amount of boots,

shoes, clothing, and utensils which he at present consumes. Labor would

then become honored and respected. Upon the uplands of the South the

white man can toil effectively in the open air. In the warehouse and the

workshop he can actually toil more hours during the year than in New

York or New England, for his fingers will not there be benumbed by the

intense cold of the North. When labor ceases to be degrading, the

military school will give place to the academy, commerce will be

honored, and a check be given to military aspirations; and should an

insurrection again occur, the loyal population bordering the coast may

be armed to resist alike insurrection at home and intervention from

abroad, and unite with our navy in preserving the peace of the country.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 10, No. 60, October, 1862 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 65 / 69 题