M. Labori.--“We are advancing, we are advancing.”

General Gonse.--“I ask the floor.”

The Judge.--“Presently, general.”

M. Labori.--“A matter of exceptional gravity has just arisen. There

is one point on which we are all agreed here: General de Pellieux

has not spoken of the Dreyfus trial. He has spoken of something that

happened after the Dreyfus trial. This matter, then, must be discussed

here. After such a statement, there can be no restriction of the

debate. I point out to General de Pellieux that no document can have

any scientific value as proof, until it has been discussed openly. We

have now reached a point in this affair--an affair that is assuming

the proportions of a State affair--where we are in the presence of

two documents, or two files of documents, equally serious,--a secret

file which was the basis of the conviction of Dreyfus in 1894 without

contradiction, without discussion, without defence, and a second secret

file which has been used for weeks to prevent anything but assertions

from being made in this court. What ever respect I may have for the

word of General de Pellieux as a soldier, I cannot grant that this

document has the slightest importance. As long as we do not know it,

until we have discussed it, until it shall be publicly known, it

will go for nothing. And it is in the name of the eternal right of

principles venerated from the beginning of civilization that I utter

these words. Consequently I now arrive at a point so precise that my

tranquillity, from any point of view, is increased. Only one thing has

worried me--the constant obscurity, the increase of public anxiety,

thanks to the daily thickening darkness, thickened I do not say by

lies, but by equivocations. Whether Dreyfus be guilty or innocent,

whether Esterhazy be guilty or innocent, these are questions of the

highest gravity. General de Pellieux, the minister of war, General

Gonse, and myself are entitled to convictions upon them, and we are

capable of going on forever unless the absolute light is brought

out. But it will not do to let the excitement of the country go on

increasing. Now we have a means, without closed doors, and without

court decrees, of arriving at the light, at least at partial light,

for the revision of the Dreyfus trial is now a thing of necessity. The

protests of the crowd show that it does not understand the seriousness

of this trial from the eternal standpoint of civilization and humanity.

If Dreyfus is guilty, and if the statements of these generals are well

founded, the proof will come out in a fair trial. If they are mistaken,

the contrary will be proved, and, when the light shall be absolute, and

all the darkness dissipated, there will be perhaps in France one or

two men really guilty and responsible, and, whether they be on the one

side or the other, they will be known and marked. And then we shall go

quietly back to our works of peace or war,--for nobody fears war with

generals worthy to speak in the name of the army which they command;

and not by threats of war, which is not approaching, whatever they may

say, are the jurors to be intimidated. Let General de Pellieux explain

himself without reserve, and let the document be produced.”

The Judge.--“General Gonse, what have you to say?”

General Gonse.--“I confirm the testimony of General de Pellieux. He

has taken the initiative, and he has done well. I would have taken it

in his place, to avoid all equivocation. The army does not fear the

light. To save its honor, it does not fear at all to tell the truth.

But prudence is a necessity, and I do not believe that proofs of this

character, though they are real and absolute, can be brought here and

made public.”

General de Pellieux.--“M. Labori spoke just now of revision on the

strength of the communication of this secret document to the council

of war. There has been no proof of such communication. I do not know

whether Colonel Henry’s testimony of the other day was listened to

with sufficient attention. He pointed out that Colonel Sandherr had

delivered to him a secret file, which had been sealed before the

sitting of the council of war and had never been opened. Now, for

a revision of the Dreyfus trial because of this document, what is

necessary? The proof.”

The Judge.--“We have not to concern ourselves with revision. That

cannot be done here.”

General de Pellieux.--“There is talk of nothing else.”

The Judge.--“I know that, but it cannot be done in an assize court.

General Gonse, have you anything more to say?”

General Gonse.--“No.”

General de Pellieux.--“I ask that General de Boisdeffre be sent for to

confirm my words.”

The Judge.--“Will you ask him to come tomorrow?”

General de Pellieux.--“Major Delcassé, take a carriage and go for

General de Boisdeffre at once. I wish to say that I have brought up

this letter only because I was forced to. Major d’Ormescheville told

me himself that the newspapers mutilated his report. I ask that he be

called to testify.”

M. Labori.--“Since it was I who read from this report, I ask permission

to answer General de Pellieux in two words.”

The Judge.--“Is it a material fact?”

M. Labori.--“This report has been published. I had nothing to do with

its publication.”

General de Pellieux.--“Has it been published in full?”

The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counsel · 第 241 / 282 题