M. Labori.--“Did not the general wear civilian dress?”

General de Pellieux.--“Yes.”

M. Labori.--“Did he not sit behind General de Luxer, president of the

council?”

General de Pellieux.--“Yes.”

M. Labori.--“Did he not intervene several times in the course of the

testimony of M. Leblois?”

General de Pellieux.--“I asked the permission of the president, of

the public minister, and of the defence, to put some questions to M.

Leblois. This authorization was granted. I think that I had the right

to do so as a magistrate.”

M. Labori.--“Did not General de Pellieux take the floor spontaneously

to correct an error of fact that had just been committed by General de

Luxer?”

General de Pellieux.--“I never took the floor without asking permission

of the defence, of the public minister, and of the president.”

M. Labori.--“Did he not take the floor to correct an error of fact that

had just been committed by General de Luxer?”

General de Pellieux.--“I do not know to what you refer.”

M. Labori.--“The general must know, and cannot fail to remember,

whether at a certain moment, in the course of the testimony of M.

Leblois, he intervened to correct an error of fact committed by the

president.”

General de Pellieux.--“I confess that I cannot remember.”

M. Labori.--“Did not the witness take the floor spontaneously to ask

of M. Tézenas if he had no opposition to make to the continuation of M.

Leblois’s testimony, and in these words: ‘You suffer him to speak?’”

General de Pellieux.--“Never.”

M. Labori.--“Did not M. Leblois ask a question of such a character as

to necessitate some supplementary information?”

General de Pellieux.--“I will not answer. This was behind closed doors.

You know very well that anything that happens behind closed doors

cannot be revealed.”

The Judge.--“The general says it was behind closed doors.”

M. Labori.--“I ask nothing in general of a secret or confidential

character. Furthermore, closed doors are possible in an assize court

as well as in a council of war, and twelve French citizens can keep

a secret as well as twelve officers. Consequently you are quite at

liberty to make the witness answer. What I am after is to show that

General de Pellieux intervened in the trial before the council of war.

I do not ask him concerning what he intervened; I ask him whether he

intervened. I insist that the question be put.”

The Judge.--“Offer your motion.”

M. Clemenceau.--“It seems to me that the general has been answering my

_confrère_ concerning matters that happened behind closed doors. Never

did the general, so far as I know, intervene before the council of war

as long as the session was public. His intervention, about which he has

been talking for the last fifteen minutes, took place behind closed

doors. I ask the court, then, where the dividing line is to be drawn,

and who shall say whether it is permissible to speak of things that

happened behind closed doors to a certain limit, of which the witness

shall be sole judge, and at which the witness may declare: ‘I will say

no more.’”

The Judge.--“How do you expect the court to know, except by the

witness, that the thing happened behind closed doors? [To the witness.]

Does the question asked you relate to an incident that happened behind

closed doors?”

General de Pellieux.--“I have been asked questions relating to personal

intervention. That does not concern closed doors. Closed doors applies

to things asked of the witnesses, but not to an individual’s attitude

during closed doors.”

M. Labori.--“Permit me, _Monsieur le Président_, to repeat the

question before asking you to put it again. Here are two questions

belonging to the same order of ideas: first, did not M. Leblois

offer an observation of such a nature as to bring out supplementary

information?”

The Judge.--“You hear the first question?”

General de Pellieux.--“I will not answer, for it is a matter of closed

doors.”

M. Labori.--“Second, was not General de Luxer then disposed to lay the

question regularly before the council of war, and had he not already

risen to propose to the judges that they retire to the council-chamber

for deliberation?”

General de Pellieux.--“No.”

M. Labori.--“Did not General de Pellieux intervene spontaneously,

saying that that was useless?”

General de Pellieux.--“No, I had nothing to say to the president.”

The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counsel · 第 105 / 282 题