M. Labori.--“And why must not the witness go into the Dreyfus case?”

General de Boisdeffre.--“Because a decree of the court, which I have

read in the newspapers, separates the two cases.”

M. Labori.--“Does not General de Boisdeffre know that Major Esterhazy

has been prosecuted and examined concerning the _bordereau_ attributed

to Dreyfus in 1894?”

General de Boisdeffre.--“Major Esterhazy was examined behind closed

doors. Consequently it is not for me to know what took place behind

closed doors.”

M. Labori.--“I believe that General de Boisdeffre is mistaken, for I

was present at the public part of that trial. I imagine that General de

Boisdeffre, having so many secrets to keep, confuses those concerning

which he is obliged to keep silence with those concerning which he need

not keep silence. At any rate, he cannot dispute that the _bordereau_

has been in question, for it has been discussed by the newspapers for

the last fortnight. I ask him to tell us, since I well understand that

it was the question of the innocence of Dreyfus that obsessed the mind

of Colonel Picquart, what Colonel Picquart did in relation to the

Esterhazy case.”

General de Boisdeffre.--“He made known his doubts concerning Major

Esterhazy’s situation. We told him to do everything to illuminate the

matter, and to settle the doubts that preoccupied him. He could find no

document that sustained his doubts to our satisfaction, and we could

only invite him to abstain and not continue his researches.”

M. Labori.--“I note here, for the benefit of the jurors, that at the

time when General de Boisdeffre, chief of staff of the army, learned

that Colonel Picquart was obsessed by this case which he will not

name, he invited him to confirm his doubts. It results therefrom that

at that time it did not seem impossible to General de Boisdeffre that

Major Esterhazy was the author of the crime for which Dreyfus had been

condemned.”

General de Boisdeffre.--“My words are incorrectly interpreted. The

guilt of Captain Dreyfus has always been to me a thing absolutely

certain, and my conviction is absolute regarding it. I do not say

more, because I wish to touch this matter as little as possible.

Consequently, when another officer was pointed out to me as guilty

of such a crime, it was my duty to order an investigation. My doubts

concerned the guilt of Major Esterhazy, and not the guilt of Captain

Dreyfus.”

M. Labori.--“Is General de Boisdeffre’s belief in the guilt of Dreyfus

based on the facts of 1894, or on facts of earlier or later date?”

General de Boisdeffre.--“It is based on the facts and the trial of

1894, the outcome of which is beyond discussion. There have been other

facts, subsequent and prior, which have,--I do not say confirmed, for

my conviction needed no confirmation,--but which have assisted my

certainty most decidedly.”

M. Labori.--“What is the source of the communications made to certain

newspapers, seeming to come from the war offices?”

General de Boisdeffre.--“To my knowledge, they do not emanate from the

war offices.”

The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counsel · 第 55 / 282 题