LITERARY BLUNDERS.

When Dante published his "Inferno," the simplicity of the age accepted

it as a true narrative of his descent into hell.

When the Utopia of Sir Thomas More was first published, it occasioned a

pleasant mistake. This political romance represents a perfect, but

visionary republic, in an island supposed to have been newly discovered

in America. "As this was the age of discovery," says Granger, "the

learned Budæus, and others, took it for a genuine history; and

considered it as highly expedient, that missionaries should be sent

thither, in order to convert so wise a nation to Christianity."

It was a long while after publication that many readers were convinced

that Gulliver's Travels were fictitious.[90]

But the most singular blunder was produced by the ingenious "Hermippus

Redivivus" of Dr. Campbell, a curious banter on the hermetic philosophy,

and the universal medicine; but the grave irony is so closely kept up,

that it deceived for a length of time the most learned. His notion of

the art of prolonging life, by inhaling the breath of young women, was

eagerly credited. A physician, who himself had composed a treatise on

health, was so influenced by it, that he actually took lodgings at a

female boarding-school, that he might never be without a constant supply

of the breath of young ladies. Mr. Thicknesse seriously adopted the

project. Dr. Kippis acknowledged that after he had read the work in his

youth, the reasonings and the facts left him several days in a kind of

fairy land. I have a copy with manuscript notes by a learned physician,

who seems to have had no doubts of its veracity. After all, the

intention of the work was long doubtful; till Dr. Campbell assured a

friend it was a mere jeu-d'esprit; that Bayle was considered as standing

without a rival in the art of treating at large a difficult subject,

without discovering to which side his own sentiments leaned: Campbell

had read more uncommon books than most men, and wished to rival Bayle,

and at the same time to give many curious matters little known.

Palavicini, in his History of the Council of Trent, to confer an honour

on M. Lansac, ambassador of Charles IX. to that council, bestows on him

a collar of the order of Saint Esprit; but which order was not

instituted till several years afterwards by Henry III. A similar

voluntary blunder is that of Surita, in his _Annales de la Corona de

Aragon_. This writer represents, in the battles he describes, many

persons who were not present; and this, merely to confer honour on some

particular families.

Fabiana, quoting a French narrative of travels in Italy, took for the

name of the author the words, found at the end of the title-page,

_Enrichi de deux Listes_; that is, "Enriched with two lists:" on this he

observes, "that Mr. Enriched with two lists has not failed to do that

justice to Ciampini which he merited."[91] The abridgers of Gesner's

Bibliotheca ascribe the romance of Amadis to one _Acuerdo Olvido_;

Remembrance, Oblivion; mistaking the French translator's Spanish motto

on the title-page for the name of the author.

D'Aquin, the French king's physician, in his Memoir on the Preparation

of Bark, takes _Mantissa_, which is the title of the Appendix to the

History of Plants, by Johnstone, for the name of an author, and who, he

says, is so extremely rare, that he only knows him by name.

Lord Bolingbroke imagined, that in those famous verses, beginning with

_Excudent alii_, &c., Virgil attributed to the Romans the glory of

having surpassed the Greeks in historical composition: according to his

idea, those Roman historians whom Virgil preferred to the Grecians were

Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. But Virgil died before Livy had written his

history, or Tacitus was born.

An honest friar, who compiled a church history, has placed in the class

of ecclesiastical writers Guarini, the Italian poet, on the faith of the

title of his celebrated amorous pastoral, _Il Pastor Fido_, "The

Faithful Shepherd;" our good father imagined that the character of a

curate, vicar, or bishop, was represented in this work.

A blunder has been recorded of the monks in the dark ages, which was

likely enough to happen when their ignorance was so dense. A rector of a

parish going to law with his parishioners about paving the church,

quoted this authority from St. Peter--_Paveant illi, non paveam ego_;

which he construed, _They are to pave the church, not I_. This was

allowed to be good law by a judge, himself an ecclesiastic too.

One of the grossest literary blunders of modern times is that of the

late Gilbert Wakefield, in his edition of Pope. He there takes the

well-known "Song by a Person of Quality," which is a piece of ridicule

on the glittering tuneful nonsense of certain poets, as a serious

composition. In a most copious commentary, he proves that every line

seems unconnected with its brothers, and that the whole reflects

disgrace on its author! A circumstance which too evidently shows how

necessary the knowledge of modern literary history is to a modern

commentator, and that those who are profound in verbal Greek are not the

best critics on English writers.

The Abbé Bizot, the author of the medallic history of Holland, fell into

a droll mistake. There is a medal, struck when Philip II. set forth his

_invincible Armada_, on which are represented the King of Spain, the

Emperor, the Pope, Electors, Cardinals, &c., with their eyes covered

with a bandage, and bearing for inscription this fine verse of

Lucretius:--

O cæcas hominum menteis! O pectora cæca!

The Abbé, prepossessed with the prejudice that a nation persecuted by

the Pope and his adherents could not represent them without some insult,

did not examine with sufficient care the ends of the bandages which

covered the eyes and waved about the heads of the personages represented

on this medal: he rashly took them for _asses' ears_, and as such they

are engraved!

Mabillon has preserved a curious literary blunder of some pious

Spaniards, who applied to the Pope for consecrating a day in honour of

_Saint Viar_. His holiness, in the voluminous catalogue of his saints,

was ignorant of this one. The only proof brought forward for his

existence was this inscription:--

Curiosities of Literature, Vol. 1 · 第 326 / 428 题