O.

Ostracism.--It was among the Greeks, as is well known, no punishment.

Only people of great merits achieved it; and so soon as this banishment

from the country was lavished upon bad men, it went entirely into

disuse. An imperial citizen must lament that we, who have a similar

public educational institution,--namely, banishment,--squander it often

upon the very wretchedest rascals, and therefore--with the design of

making one circle or country the spit-box and secreting-vessel of

another--drive out of the country scoundrels who are hardly fit to stay

in it. Thereby is this clearing of the country deprived for the most

part of the honorable and distinguishing feature which it might have

for the man of merit, and an honest man--e. g. a Bahrdt[232]--is almost

ashamed to be invested with such an honor. There should, therefore, be

an imperial police-regulation that only ministers, professors, and

officers of decided worth, like important documents, should be

dismissed and banished. To similar men I would also limit hanging. With

the Romans, in truth, only great heads and lights were interred on the

_way_[233] at the expense of a whole state; but what shall I think of

the Germans, with whom seldom serviceable subjects, but mostly finished

rogues, are buried at public expense, which they call hangman's fees,

having been previously hanged on the gallows by the roadside?--Not even

in his lifetime can a man, unless he has extraordinary, and often

_eccentric_ merits,--although eccentric men fall back into the truth,

as _comets_ do into the _sun_, as fuel,--make his calculations upon

being, in some manner, as the ancients duplicated their noble men in

statues and pictures, hung up in _effigy_ in a thick stone frame....

Let me have an answer; I allow myself to be talked with.

Hesperus; or, Forty-Five Dog-Post-Days: A Biography. Vol. I. · 第 90 / 109 题