Chapter I

Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Jeroen Hellingman and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team.

A Wanderer in Holland

By

E.V. Lucas

With Twenty Illustrations in Colour By

Herbert Marshall

And Thirty-Four Illustrations After Old Dutch Masters

Contents

Preface

I Rotterdam

II The Dutch in English Literature

III Dordrecht and Utrecht

IV Delft

V The Hague

VI Scheveningen and Katwyk

VII Leyden

VIII Leyden's Painters, a Fanatic and a Hero

IX Haarlem

X Amsterdam

XI Amsterdam's Pictures

XII Around Amsterdam; South and South-East

XIII Around Amsterdam: North

XIV Alkmaar and Hoorn, The Helder and Enkhuisen

XV Friesland: Stavoren to Leeuwarden

XVI Friesland (continued): Leeuwarden and Neighbourhood

XVII Groningen to Zutphen

XVIII Arnheim to Bergen-op-Zoom

XIX Middelburg

XX Flushing

List of Illustrations

In Colour

Sunrise on the Maas

Rotterdam

Gouda

The Great Church, Dort

Utrecht

On the Beach, Scheveningen

Leyden

The Turf Market, Haarlem

St. Nicolas Church, Amsterdam

Canal in the Jews' Quarter, Amsterdam

Volendam

Cheese Market, Alkmaar

The Harbour Tower, Hoorn

Market Place, Weigh-house, Hoorn

The Dromedaris Tower, Enkhuisen

Harlingen

Kampen

Arnheim

The Market Place, Nymwegen

Middelburg

In Monotone

Girl's Head. Jan Vermeer of Delft (Mauritshuis)

The Store Cupboard. Peter de Hooch (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Portrait of a Youth. Jan van Scorel (Boymans Museum,

Rotterdam)

The Sick Woman. Jan Steen (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Anxious Family. Josef Israels

View of Dort. Albert Cuyp (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Never-Ending Prayer. Nicholas Maes (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

A Lady. Paulus Moreelse (Ryks)

Pilgrims to Jerusalem. Jan van Scorel

(Kunstliefde Museum, Utrecht)

View of Delft. Jan Vermeer (Mauritshuis)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The School of Anatomy. Rembrandt (Mauritshuis)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

A Young Woman. Rembrandt (Mauritshuis)

The Steen Family. Jan Steen (Mauritshuis)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Menagerie. Jan Steen (Mauritshuis)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Portrait of G. Bicker, Landrichter of Muiden. Van der Heist

(Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Syndics. Rembrandt (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Oyster Feast. Jan Steen (Mauritshuis)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Young Housekeeper. Gerard Dou (Mauritshuis)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Breakfast. Gabriel Metsu (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Groote Kerk. Johannes Bosboom (Boymans Museum, Rotterdam)

The Painter and His Wife (?). Frans Hals (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Group of Arquebusiers. Frans Hals (Haarlem)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Cat's Dancing Lesson. Jan Steen (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The "Night Watch". Rembrandt (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Reader. Jan Vermeer (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Milking Time. Anton Mauve

Paternal Advice. Gerard Terburg (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Spinner. Nicholas Maes (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Clara Alewijn. Dirck Santvoort (Ryks)

Family Scene. Jan Steen (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Little Princess. Paulus Moreelse (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

The Shepherd and His Flock. Anton Mauve

Helene van der Schalke. Gerard Terburg (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Elizabeth Bas. Rembrandt (Ryks)

From a Photograph by Franz Hanfstaengl

Preface

It would be useless to pretend that this book is authoritatively

informing. It is a series of personal impressions of the Dutch country

and the Dutch people, gathered during three visits, together with an

accretion of matter, more or less pertinent, drawn from many sources,

old and new, to which I hope I have given unity. For trustworthy

information upon the more serious side of Dutch life and character I

would recommend Mr. Meldrum's _Holland and the Hollanders_. My thanks

are due to my friends, Mr. and Mrs. Emil Lüden, for saving me from

many errors by reading this work in MS.

E.V.L.

A WANDERER IN HOLLAND

Chapter I

Rotterdam

To Rotterdam by water--To Rotterdam by rail--Holland's

monotony of scenery--Holland in England--Rotterdam's few

merits--The life of the river--The Rhine--Walt Whitman--Crowded

canals--Barge life--The Dutch high-ways--A perfect holiday--The

canal's influence on the national character--The florin

and the franc--Lady Mary Wortley Montagu--The old and the

poor--Holland's health--Funeral customs--The chemists'

shops--Erasmus of Rotterdam--Latinised names--Peter de

Hooch--True aristocracy--The Boymans treasures--Modern

Dutch art--Matthew Maris--The Rotterdam Zoo--The herons--The

stork's mission--The ourang-outang--An eighteenth-century

miser--A successful merchant--The Queen-Mother--Tom Hood

in Rotterdam--Gouda.

It was once possible to sail all the way to Rotterdam by either of

the two lines of steamships from England--the Great Eastern, _viâ_

Harwich, and the Batavier, direct from London. But that is possible

now only by the Batavier, passengers by the better-known Harwich

route being landed now and henceforward at the Hook at five A.M. I am

sorry for this, because after a rough passage it was very pleasant

to glide in the early morning steadily up the Maas and gradually

acquire a sense of Dutch quietude and greyness. No longer, however,

can this be done, as the Batavier boats reach Rotterdam at night;

and one therefore misses the river, with the little villages on its

banks, each with a tiny canal-harbour of its own; the groups of trees

in the early mist; the gulls and herons; and the increasing traffic

as one drew nearer Schiedam and at last reached that forest of masts

which is known as Rotterdam.

But now that the only road to Rotterdam by daylight is the road

of iron all that is past, and yet there is some compensation, for

short as the journey is one may in its progress ground oneself very

thoroughly in the characteristic scenery of Holland. No one who looks

steadily out of the windows between the Hook and Rotterdam has much

to learn thereafter. Only changing skies and atmospheric effects can

provide him with novelty, for most of Holland is like that. He has the

formula. Nor is it necessarily new to him if he knows England well,

North Holland being merely the Norfolk Broads, the Essex marshlands

about Burnham-on-Crouch, extended. Only in its peculiarity of light

and in its towns has Holland anything that we have not at home.

England has even its canal life too, if one cared to investigate

it; the Broads are populous with wherries and barges; cheese is

manufactured in England in a score of districts; cows range our

meadows as they range the meadows of the Dutch. We go to Holland to

see the towns, the pictures and the people. We go also because so

many of us are so constituted that we never use our eyes until we

are on foreign soil. It is as though a Cook's ticket performed an

operation for cataract.

But because one can learn the character of Dutch scenery so quickly--on

a single railway journey--I do not wish to suggest that henceforward it

becomes monotonous and trite. One may learn the character of a friend

very quickly, and yet wish to be in his company continually. Holland

is one of the most delightful countries to move about in: everything

that happens in it is of interest. I have never quite lost the

sense of excitement in crossing a canal in the train and getting a

momentary glimpse of its receding straightness, perhaps broken by a

brown sail. In a country where, between the towns, so little happens,

even the slightest things make a heightened appeal to the observer;

while one's eyes are continually kept bright and one's mind stimulated

by the ever-present freshness and clearness of the land and its air.

Rotterdam, it should be said at once, is not a pleasant city. It

must be approached as a centre of commerce and maritime industry,

or not at all; if you do not like sailor men and sailor ways, noisy

streets and hurrying people, leave Rotterdam behind, and let the

train carry you to The Hague. It is not even particularly Dutch: it

is cosmopolitan. The Dutch are quieter than this, and cleaner. And

yet Rotterdam is unique--its church of St. Lawrence has a grey and

sombre tower which has no equal in the country; there is a windmill

on the Cool Singel which is essentially Holland; the Boymans Museum

has a few admirable pictures; there is a curiously fascinating stork

in the Zoological Gardens; and the river is a scene of romantic energy

by day and night. I think you must go to Rotterdam, though it be only

for a few hours.

At Rotterdam we see what the Londoner misses by having a river that

is navigable in the larger sense only below his city. To see shipping

at home we must make our tortuous way to the Pool; Rotterdam has the

Pool in her midst. Great ships pass up and down all day. The Thames,

once its bustling mercantile life is cut short by London Bridge,

dwindles to a stream of pleasure; the Maas becomes the Rhine.

Walt Whitman is the only writer who has done justice to a great

harbour, and he only by that sheer force of enumeration which in this

connection rather stands for than is poetry. As a matter of fact it

is the reader of such an inventory as we find in "Crossing Brooklyn

Ferry" that is the poet: Whitman is only the machinery. Whitman gives

the suggestion and the reader's own memory or imagination does the

rest. Many of the lines might as easily have been written of Rotterdam

as of Brooklyn:--

The sailors at work in the rigging or out astride the spars,

The round masts, the swinging motion of the hulls, the slender

serpentine pennants,

The large and small steamers in motion, the pilots in their

pilot-houses,

The white wake left by the passage, the quick tremulous whirl of

the wheels,

The flags of all nations, the falling of them at sunset,

The scallop-edged waves in the twilight, the ladled cups, the

frolicsome crests and glistening,

The stretch afar growing dimmer and dimmer, the grey walls of

the granite storehouses by the docks,

On the river the shadowy group, the big steam-tug closely flank'd

on each side by the barges, the hay-boat, the belated lighter,

On the neighbouring shore the fires from the foundry chimneys

burning high and glaringly into the night,

Casting their flicker of black contrasted with wild red and

yellow light over the tops of the houses, and down into the clefts

of streets.

There is of course nothing odd in the description of one harbour

fitting another, for harbours have no one nationality but all. Whitman

was not otherwise very strong upon Holland. He writes in "Salut au

Monde" of "the sail and steamships of the world" which in his mind's

eye he beholds as they

Wait steam'd up ready to start in the ports of Australia,

Wait at Liverpool, Glasgow, Dublin, Marseilles, Lisbon, Naples,

Hamburg, Bremen, Bordeaux, The Hague, Copenhagen.

It is not easy for one of the "sail or steamships of the world" to

wait steamed up at The Hague; because The Hague has no harbour except

for small craft and barges. Shall we assume, with great charity,

that Walt feared that the word Rotterdam might impair his rhythm?

Not only big shipping: I think one may see barges and canal boats in

greater variety at Rotterdam than anywhere else. One curious thing

to be noticed as they lie at rest in the canals is the absence of

men. A woman is always there; her husband only rarely. The only

visible captain is the fussy, shrewish little dog which, suspicious

of the whole world, patrols the boat from stem to stern, and warns

you that it is against the law even to look at his property. I hope

his bite is not equal to his bark.

Every barge has its name. What the popular style was seven years

ago, when I was here last, I cannot remember; but to-day it is

"Wilhelmina". English suburban villas have not a greater variety of

fantastic names than the canal craft of Holland; nor, with all our

monopoly of the word "home," does the English suburban villa suggest

more compact cosiness than one catches gleams of through their cabin

windows or down their companions.

Spring cleaning goes on here, as in the Dutch houses, all the year

round, and the domiciliary part of the vessels is spotless. Every

bulwark has a washing tray that can be fixed or detached in a

moment. "It's a fine day, let us kill something," says the Englishman;

"Here's an odd moment, let us wash something," says the Dutch vrouw.

In some of the Rotterdam canals the barges are so packed that they

lie touching each other, with their burgees flying all in the same

direction, as the vanes of St. Sepulchre's in Holborn cannot do. How

they ever get disentangled again and proceed on their free way to

their distant homes is a mystery. But in the shipping world incredible

things can happen at night.

One does not, perhaps, in Rotterdam realise all at once that every drop

of water in these city-bound canals is related to every other drop of

water in the other canals of Holland, however distant. From any one

canal you can reach in time every other. The canal is really much more

the high road of the country than the road itself. The barge is the

Pickford van of Holland. Here we see some of the secret of the Dutch

deliberateness. A country which must wait for its goods until a barge

brings them has every opportunity of acquiring philosophic phlegm.

After a while one gets accustomed to the ever-present canal and the odd

spectacle (to us) of masts in the streets and sails in the fields. All

the Dutch towns are amphibious, but some are more watery than others.

The Dutch do not use their wealth of water as we should. They do not

swim in it, they do not race on it, they do not row for pleasure at

all. Water is their servant, never a light-hearted companion.

I can think of no more reposeful holiday than to step on board one of

these barges wedged together in a Rotterdam canal, and never lifting

a finger to alter the natural course of events--to accelerate or

divert--be earned by it to, say, Harlingen, in Friesland: between the

meadows; under the noses of the great black and white cows; past herons

fishing in the rushes; through little villages with dazzling milk-cans

being scoured on the banks, and the good-wives washing, and saturnine

smokers in black velvet slippers passing the time of day; through

big towns, by rows of sombre houses seen through a delicate screen of

leaves; under low bridges crowded with children; through narrow locks;

ever moving, moving, slowly and surely, sometimes sailing, sometimes

quanting, sometimes being towed, with the wide Dutch sky overhead,

and the plovers crying in it, and the clean west wind driving the

windmills, and everything just as it was in Rembrandt's day and just

as it will be five hundred years hence.

Holland when all is said is a country of canals. It may have cities

and pictures, windmills and cows, quaint buildings, and quainter

costumes, but it is a country of canals before all. The canals set

the tune. The canals keep it deliberate and wise.

One can be in Rotterdam, or in whatever town one's travels really

begin, but a very short time without discovering that the Dutch

unit--the florin--is a very unsatisfactory servant. The dearness

of Holland strikes one continually, but it does so with peculiar

force if one has crossed the frontier from Belgium, where the unit

is a franc. It is too much to say that a sovereign in Holland is

worth only twelve shillings: the case is not quite so extreme as

that; but a sovereign in Belgium is, for all practical purposes,

worth twenty-five shillings, and the contrast after reaching Dutch

soil is very striking. One has to recollect that the spidery letter

"f," which in those friendly little restaurants in the Rue Hareng at

Brussels had stood for a franc, now symbolises that far more serious

item the florin; and f. 1.50, which used to be a trifle of one and

threepence, is now half a crown.

Even in our own country, where we know something about the cost of

things, we are continually conscious of the fallacy embodied in the

statement that a sovereign is equal to twenty shillings. We know that

in theory that is so; but we know also that it is so only as long as

the sovereign remains unchanged. Change it and it is worth next to

nothing--half a sovereign and a little loose silver. But in Holland

the disparity is even more pathetic. To change a sovereign there

strikes one as the most ridiculous business transaction of one's life.

Certain things in Holland are dear beyond all understanding. At The

Hague, for example, we drank Eau d'Evian, a very popular bottled water

for which in any French restaurant one expects to pay a few pence;

and when the bill arrived this simple fluid cut such a dashing figure

in it that at first I could not recognise it at all. When I put the

matter to the landlord, he explained that the duty made it impossible

for him to charge less than f. 1.50 (or half a crown) a bottle;

but I am told that his excuse was too fanciful. None the less, half

a crown was the charge, and apparently no one objects to pay it. The

Dutch, on pleasure or eating bent, are prepared to pay anything. One

would expect to get a reasonable claret for such a figure; but not

in Holland. Wine is good there, but it is not cheap. Only in one

hotel--and that in the unspoiled north, at Groningen--did I see wine

placed automatically upon the table, as in France.

Rotterdam must have changed for the worse under modern conditions;

for it is no longer as it was in Lady Mary Wortley Montagu's day. From

Rotterdam in 1716 she sent the Countess of Mar a pretty account of

the city: "All the streets are paved with broad stones, and before

the meanest artificers' doors seats of various coloured marbles,

and so neatly kept that, I will assure you, I walked all over the

town yesterday, _incognita_, in my slippers, without receiving one

spot of dirt; and you may see the Dutch maids washing the pavement of

the street with more application than ours do our bed-chambers. The

town seems so full of people, with such busy faces, all in motion,

that I can hardly fancy that it is not some celebrated fair; but I

see it is every day the same.

"The shops and warehouses are of a surprising neatness and

magnificence, filled with an incredible quantity of fine merchandise,

and so much cheaper than what we see in England, I have much ado

to persuade myself I am still so near it. Here is neither dirt nor

beggary to be seen. One is not shocked with those loathsome cripples,

so common in London, nor teased with the importunities of idle fellows

and wenches, that choose to be nasty and lazy. The common servants

and the little shopwomen here are more nicely clean than most of our

ladies; and the great variety of neat dresses (every woman dressing

her head after her own fashion) is an additional pleasure in seeing

the town."

The claims of business have now thrust aside many of the little

refinements described by Lady Mary, her description of which has but

to be transferred to some of the smaller Dutch towns to be however

in the main still accurate. But what she says of the Dutch servants

is true everywhere to this minute. There are none more fresh and

capable; none who carry their lot with more quiet dignity. Not the

least part of the very warm hospitality which is offered in Dutch

houses is played by the friendliness of the servants.

Every one in Holland seems to have enough; no one too

much. Great wealth there may be among the merchants, but it is not

ostentatious. Holland still seems to have no poor in the extreme sense

of the word, no rags. Doubtless the labourers that one sees are working

at a low rate, but they are probably living comfortably at a lower,

and are not to be pitied except by those who still cherish the illusion

that riches mean happiness. The dirt and poverty that exist in every

English town and village are very uncommon. Nor does one see maimed,

infirm or very old people, except now and then--so rarely as at once

to be reminded of their rarity.

One is struck, even in Rotterdam, which is a peculiarly strenuous

town, by the ruddy health of the people in the streets. In England,

as one walks about, one sees too often the shadow of Death on this

face and that; but in Holland it is difficult to believe in his power,

the people have so prosperous, so permanent, an air.

That the Dutch die there is no doubt, for a funeral is an almost

daily object, and the aanspreker is continually hurrying by; but

where are the dead? The cemeteries are minute, and the churches have

no churchyards. Of Death, however, when he comes the nation is very

proud. The mourning customs are severe and enduring. No expense is

spared in spreading the interesting tidings. It is for this purpose

that the aanspreker flourishes in his importance and pomp. Draped

heavily in black, from house to house he moves, wherever the slightest

ties of personal or business acquaintanceship exist, and announces

his news. A lady of Hilversum tells me that she was once formally the

recipient of the message, "Please, ma'am, the baker's compliments,

and he's dead," the time and place of the interment following. I said

draped in black, but the aanspreker is not so monotonous an official as

that. He has his subtleties, his nuances. If the deceased is a child,

he adds a white rosette; if a bachelor or a maid, he intimates the

fact by degrees of trimming.

The aanspreker was once occasionally assisted by the huilebalk, but I

am afraid his day is over. The huilebalk accompanied the aansprekers

from house to house and wept on the completion of their sad message. He

wore a wide-awake hat with a very large brim and a long-tailed coat. If

properly paid, says my informant, real tears coursed down his cheeks;

in any case his presence was a luxury possible only to the rich.

The aanspreker is called in also at the other end of life. Assuming

a more jocund air, he trips from house to house announcing little

strangers.

That the Dutch are a healthy people one might gather also from the

character of their druggists. In this country, even in very remote

towns, one may reveal one's symptoms to a chemist or his assistant

feeling certain that he will know more or less what to prescribe. But

in Holland the chemists are often young women, who preside over shops

in which one cannot repose any confidence. One likes a chemist's shop

at least to look as if it contained reasonable remedies. These do

not. Either our shops contain too many drugs or these too few. The

chemist's sign, a large comic head with its mouth wide open (known

as the gaper), is also subversive of confidence. A chemist's shop is

no place for jokes. In Holland one must in short do as the Dutch do,

and remain well.

Rotterdam's first claim to consideration, apart from its commercial

importance, is that it gave birth to Erasmus, a bronze statue

of whom stands in the Groote Market, looking down on the stalls

of fruit. Erasmus of Rotterdam--it sounds like a contradiction

in terms. Gherardt Gherardts of Rotterdam is a not dishonourable

cacophany--and that was the reformer's true name; but the fashion

of the time led scholars to adopt a Hellenised, or Latinised,

style. Erasmus Desiderius, his new name, means Beloved and long

desired. Grotius, Barlaeus, Vossius, Arminius, all sacrificed local

colour to smooth syllables. We should be very grateful that the fashion

did not spread also to the painters. What a loss it would be had the

magnificent rugged name of Rembrandt van Rhyn been exchanged for a

smooth emasculated Latinism.

Rotterdam had another illustrious son whose work as little suggests

his birthplace--the exquisite painter Peter de Hooch. According to the

authorities he modelled his style upon Rembrandt and Fabritius, but the

influence of Rembrandt is concealed from the superficial observer. De

Hooch, whose pictures are very scarce, worked chiefly at Delft and

Haarlem, and it was at Haarlem that he died in 1681. If one were put

to it to find a new standard of aristocracy superior to accidents

of blood or rank one might do worse than demand as the ultimate test

the possession of either a Vermeer of Delft or a Peter de Hooch.

One only of Peter de Hooch's pictures is reproduced in this book--"The

Store Cupboard". This is partly because there are, I think, better

paintings of his in London than at Amsterdam. At least it seems to

me that his picture in our National Gallery of the waiting maid is

finer than anything by De Hooch in Holland. But in no other work

of his that I know is his simple charm so apparent as in "The Store

Cupboard". This is surely the Christmas supplement carried out to its

highest power--and by its inventor. The thousands of domestic scenes

which have proceeded from this one canvas make the memory reel; and

yet nothing has staled the prototype. It remains a sweet and genuine

and radiant thing. De Hooch had two fetishes--a rich crimson dress

or jacket and an open door. His compatriot Vermeer, whom he sometimes

resembles, was similarly addicted to a note of blue.

No one has managed direct sunlight so well as De Hooch. The light in

his rooms is the light of day. One can almost understand how Rembrandt

and Gerard Dou got their concentrated effects of illumination; but

how this omnipresent radiance streamed from De Hooch's palette is one

of the mysteries. It is as though he did not paint light but found

light on his canvas and painted everything else in its midst.

Rotterdam has some excellent pictures in its Boymans Museum; but they

are, I fancy, overlooked by many visitors. It seems no city in which to

see pictures. It is a city for anything rather than art--a mercantile

centre, a hive of bees, a shipping port of intense activity. And

yet perhaps the quietest little Albert Cuyp in Holland is here, "De

Oude Oostpoort te Rotterdam," a small evening scene, without cattle,

suffused in a golden glow. But all the Cuyps, and there are six,

are good--all inhabited by their own light.

Among the other Boymans treasures which I find I have marked (not

necessarily because they are good--for I am no judge--but because

I liked them) are Ferdinand Bols fine free portrait of Dirck van

der Waeijen, a boy in a yellow coat; Erckhart's "Boaz and Ruth," a

small sombre canvas with a suggestion of Velasquez in it; Hobbema's

"Boomrijk Landschap," one of the few paintings of this artist that

Holland possesses. The English, I might remark, always appreciative

judges of Dutch art, have been particularly assiduous in the pursuit of

Hobbema, with the result that his best work is in our country. Holland

has nothing of his to compare with the "Avenue at Middelharnis,"

one of the gems of our National Gallery. And his feathery trees may

be studied at the Wallace Collection in great comfort.

Other fine landscapes in the Boymans Museum are three by Johan

van Kessel, who was a pupil of Hobbema, one by Jan van der Meer,

one by Koninck, and, by Jacob van Ruisdael, a corafield in the sun

and an Amsterdam canal with white sails upon it. The most notable

head is that by Karel Fabritius; Hendrick Pot's "Het Lokstertje"

is interesting for its large free manner and signs of the influence

of Hals; and Emmanuel de Witte's Amsterdam fishmarket is curiously

modern. But the figure picture which most attracted me was "Portret

van een jongeling," by Jan van Scorel, of whom we shall learn more at

Utrecht. This little portrait, which I reproduce on the opposite page,

is wholly charming and vivid.

The Boymans Museum contains also modern Dutch paintings. Wherever

modern Dutch paintings are to be seen, I look first for the delicate

art of Matthew Maris, and next for Anton Mauve. Here there is no

Matthew Maris, and but one James Maris. There is one Mauve. The modern

Dutch painter for the most part paints the same picture so often. But

Matthew Maris is full of surprises. If a new picture by any of his

contemporaries stood with its face to the wall one would know what

to expect. From Israels, a fisherman's wife; from Mesdag, a grey

stretch of sea; from Bosboom, a superb church interior; from Mauve,

a peasant with sheep or a peasant with a cow; from Weissenbruch, a

stream and a willow; from Breitner, an Amsterdam street; from James

Maris a masterly scene of boats and wet sky. Usually one would have

guessed aright. But with Matthew Maris is no certainty. It may be a

little dainty girl lying on her side and watching butterflies; it may

be a sombre hillside at Montmartre; it may be a girl cooking; it may

be scaffolding in Amsterdam, or a mere at evening, or a baby's head,

or a village street. He has many moods, and he is always distinguished

and subtle.

Rotterdam has a zoological garden which, although inferior to ours,

is far better than that at Amsterdam, while it converts The Hague's Zoo

into a travesty. Last spring the lions were in splendid condition. They

are well housed, but fewer distractions are provided for them than

in Regent's Park. I found myself fascinated by the herons, who were

continually soaring out over the neighbouring houses and returning

like darkening clouds. In England, although the heron is a native, we

rarely seem to see him; while to study him is extremely difficult. In

Holland he is ubiquitous: both wild and tame.

More interesting still was the stork, whose nest is set high on

a pinnacle of the buffalo house. He was building in the leisurely

style of the British working man. He would negligently descend from

the heavens with a stick. This he would lay on the fabric and then

carefully perform his toilet, looking round and down all the time

to see that every one else was busy. Whenever his eye lighted upon

a toddling child or a perambulator it visibly brightened. "My true

work!" he seemed to say; "this nest building is a mere by-path of

industry." After prinking and overlooking, and congratulating himself

thus, for a few minutes, he would stroll off, over the housetops,

for another stick. He was the unquestionable King of the Garden.

Why are there no heronries in the English public parks? And why is

there no stork? The Dutch have a proverb, "Where the stork abides

no mother dies in childbed". Still more, why are there no storks in

France? The author of _Fécondité_ should have imported them.

No Zoo, however well managed, can keep an ourang-outang long, and

therefore one should always study that uncomfortably human creature

whenever the opportunity occurs. I had great fortune at Rotterdam,

for I chanced to be in the ourang-outang's house when his keeper

came in. Entering the enclosure, he romped with him in a score of

diverting ways. They embraced each other, fed each other, teased

each other. The humanness of the creature was frightful. Perhaps our

likeness to ourang-outangs (except for our ridiculously short arms,

inadequate lower jaws and lack of hair) made him similarly uneasy.

Rotterdam, I have read somewhere, was famous at the end of the

eighteenth century for a miser, the richest man in the city. He always

did his own marketing, and once changed his butcher because he weighed

the paper with the meat He bought his milk in farthingsworths, half

of which had to be delivered at his front door and half at the back,

"to gain the little advantage of extra measure". Different travellers

note different things, and William Chambers, the publisher, in his

_Tour in Holland_ in 1839, selected for special notice another type

of Rotterdam resident: "One of the most remarkable men of this [the

merchant] class is Mr. Van Hoboken of Rhoon and Pendrecht, who lives

on one of the havens. This individual began life as a merchant's

porter, and has in process of time attained the highest rank among

the Dutch mercantile aristocracy. He is at present the principal owner

of twenty large ships in the East India trade, each, I was informed,

worth about fourteen thousand pounds, besides a large landed estate,

and much floating wealth of different descriptions. His establishment

is of vast extent, and contains departments for the building of ships

and manufacture of all their necessary equipments. This gentleman,

until lately, was in the habit of giving a splendid fête once a year

to his family and friends, at which was exhibited with modest pride

the porter's truck which he drew at the outset of his career. One

seldom hears of British merchants thus keeping alive the remembrance

of early meanness of circumstances."

At one of Rotterdam's stations I saw the Queen-Mother, a

smiling, maternal lady in a lavender silk dress, carrying a large

bouquet, and saying pretty things to a deputation drawn up on the

platform. Rotterdam had put out its best bunting, and laid six inches

of sand on its roads, to do honour to this kindly royalty. The band

played the tender national anthem, which is always so unlike what one

expects it to be, as her train steamed away, and then all the grave

bearded gentlemen in uniforms and frock coats who had attended her

drove in their open carriages back to the town. Not even the presence

of the mounted guard made it more formal than a family party. Everybody

seemed on the best of friendly terms of equality with everybody else.

Tom Hood, who had it in him to be so good a poet, but living in a

country where art and literature do not count, was permitted to coarsen

his delicate genius in the hunt for bread, wrote one of his comic

poems on Rotterdam. In it are many happy touches of description:--

Before me lie dark waters

In broad canals and deep,

Whereon the silver moonbeams

Sleep, restless in their sleep;

A sort of vulgar Venice

Reminds me where I am;

Yes, yes, you are in England,

And I'm at Rotterdam.

Tall houses with quaint gables,

Where frequent windows shine,

And quays that lead to bridges,

And trees in formal line,

And masts of spicy vessels

From western Surinam,

All tell me you're in England,

But I'm in Rotterdam.

With headquarters at Rotterdam one may make certain small journeys

into the neighbourhood--to Dordrecht by river, to Delft by canal,

to Gouda by canal; or one may take longer voyages, even to Cologne if

one wishes. But I do not recommend it as a city to linger in. Better

than Rotterdam's large hotels are, I think, the smaller, humbler

and more Dutch inns of the less commercial towns. This indeed is the

case all over Holland: the plain Dutch inn of the neighbouring small

town is pleasanter than the large hotels of the city; and, as I have

remarked in the chapter on Amsterdam, the distances are so short,

and the trains so numerous, that one suffers no inconvenience from

staying in the smaller places.

Gouda (pronounced Howda) it is well to visit from Rotterdam, for it

has not enough to repay a sojourn in its midst. It has a Groote Kerk

and a pretty isolated white stadhuis. But Gouda's fame rests on its

stained glass--gigantic representations of myth, history and scripture,

chiefly by the brothers Crabeth. The windows are interesting rather

than beautiful. They lack the richness and mystery which one likes

to find in old stained glass, and the church itself is bare and cold

and unfriendly. Hemmed in by all this coloured glass, so able and

so direct, one sighs for a momentary glimpse of the rose window at

Chartres, or even of the too heavily kaleidoscopic patterns of Brussels

Cathedral. No matter, the Gouda windows in their way are very fine,

and in the sixth, depicting the story of Judith and Holofernes, there

is a very fascinating little Düreresque tower on a rock under siege.

If one is taking Gouda on the way from Rotterdam to Amsterdam,

the surrounding country should not be neglected from the carriage

windows. Holland is rarely so luxuriant as here, and so peacefully

beautiful.

A Wanderer in Holland · 第 1 / 20 章