EDWARD III――RICHARD II.

Edward III, who soon after assumed full power, was destined to make

good the remark prevalent at this time, that the kings of England were

alternately able and imbecile. He was a warlike and sagacious monarch,

and inspired by all his grandfather’s desire of conquest. In 1329,

Robert Bruce died, and was succeeded by his infant son DAVID II, to

whom a young sister of the English king was married, in terms of the

late treaty. Notwithstanding this connection, Edward aided a son of

John Baliol in an attempt to gain the Scottish crown. Edward Baliol

overthrew the Regent of Scotland at Duplin, September 1332, and for

two months reigned as King of Scots, while David and his wife took

refuge in France. Though now expelled, Baliol afterwards returned to

renew his claims, and for many years the country was harassed by

unceasing wars, in which the English took a leading part.

But for his attention being diverted to France, Edward III would have

made a more formidable effort to subdue Scotland, and might have

succeeded. He was led into a long course of warfare with France, in

consequence of an absurd pretension which he had made to its crown. In

the victories which he had gained at Cressy (August 26, 1346) and

Poitiers (September 17, 1356), the national valor, his own, and that

of his celebrated son, the Black Prince, were shown conspicuously; but

this lavish expenditure of the resources of his kingdom, in which he

was supported by his parliament, was of no permanent benefit, even to

himself, for whom alone it was made. In those days, almost all men

fought well, but very few had the art to improve their victories.

John, king of France, who had been made captive at Poitiers, and

David, king of Scotland, who had been taken in 1346, while conducting

an invasion of England, were at one time prisoners in England; but no

permanent advantage was ever gained over either of the states thus

deprived of their sovereigns. In 1361, after about twenty years of

active fighting, the English king left France with little more

territory than he had previously enjoyed. Edward had invaded Scotland

with a powerful army in 1356, but without making any impression. The

Scots, under David’s nephew, Robert Stuart, effectually protected

themselves, not only from his arms, but from a proposal which David

himself basely undertook to make, that Lionel, the third son of the

English king, should be acknowledged as his successor. Edward died in

1377, a year after the decease of his son the Black Prince; and

notwithstanding all their brilliant exploits, the English territories

in France were less than at the beginning of the reign.

England was at this time affected more than at any other by the

fashions of chivalry. This was a military enthusiasm, which for some

centuries pervaded all Christian Europe. It prompted, as one of its

first principles, a heedless bravery in encountering all kinds of

danger. Its votaries were expected to be particularly bold in behalf

of the fair sex, insomuch that a young knight would sometimes

challenge to mortal combat any one who denied his mistress to be the

loveliest in the world. Tournaments were held, at which knights clad

in complete armor would ride against each other at full speed with

leveled lances, merely to try which had the greatest strength and

skill; and many were killed on these occasions. It was a system full

of extravagance, and tending to bloodshed; but nevertheless it

maintained a certain courtesy towards females, and a romantic

principle of honor, which we may be glad to admire, considering how

rude was almost every other feature of the age.

Edward III was succeeded by his grandson, RICHARD II, then a boy of

eleven years of age, and who proved to be a person of weak and

profligate character. The Commons took advantage of the irregularity

of his government to strengthen their privileges, which they had with

difficulty sustained during the more powerful rule of his predecessor.

Early in this reign they assumed the right, not only of taxing the

country, but of seeing how the money was spent. Indignant at the

severity of a tax imposed upon all grown-up persons, the peasantry of

the eastern parts of England rose, in 1381, under a person of their

own order, named Wat Tyler, and advanced, to the number of 60,000, to

London, where they put to death the chancellor and primate, as evil

counselors of their sovereign. They demanded the abolition of bondage,

the liberty of buying and selling in fairs and markets, a general

pardon, and the reduction of the rent of land to an equal rate. The

king came to confer with them at Smithfield, where, on some slight

pretense, Walworth, mayor of London, stabbed Wat Tyler with a

dagger――a weapon which has since figured in the armorial bearings of

the metropolis. The peasants were dismayed, and submitted, and no

fewer than fifteen hundred of them were hanged. Wat Tyler’s

insurrection certainly proceeded upon a glimmering sense of those

equal rights of mankind which have since been generally acknowledged;

and it is remarkable, that at the same time the doctrines of the

reformer Wickliffe were first heard of. This learned ecclesiastic

wrote against the power of the Pope, and some of the most important

points of the Romish faith, and also executed a translation of the

Bible into English. His writings are acknowledged to have been of

material, though not immediate effect, in bringing about the

reformation of religion.

The country was misgoverned by Richard II till 1399, when he was

deposed by his subjects under the leading of his cousin, Henry, Duke

of Lancaster. This person, though some nearer the throne were alive,

was crowned as HENRY IV, and his predecessor, Richard, was soon after

murdered. In the meantime, David of Scotland died in 1371, and was

succeeded by ROBERT STUART, who was the first monarch of that family.

ROBERT I, dying in 1389, was succeeded by his son ROBERT II, who was a

good and gentle prince. He had two sons, David and James; the former

was starved to death by his uncle, the Duke of Albany; and the latter,

when on his way to France for his education, was seized by Henry IV of

England, and kept captive in that country for eighteen years. Robert

II then died of a broken heart (1406), and the kingdom fell into the

hands of the Duke of Albany, at whose death, in 1419, it was governed

by his son Duke Murdoch, a very imbecile personage.

The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers. · 第 76 / 251 题