EDWARD I AND II――ATTEMPTED CONQUEST OF SCOTLAND.

Henry III, at his death in 1272, was succeeded by his son EDWARD I, a

prince as warlike and sagacious as his father was the reverse. He

distinguished himself by his attempts to add Wales to his kingdom, an

object which he accomplished in 1282, by the overthrow and murder of

Llewellen, the last prince of that country. In the meantime, from the

death of William the Lion in 1214, Scotland had been ruled by two

princes, ALEXANDER II, and III, under whom it advanced considerably in

wealth, civilization, and comfort. On the death of Alexandria III, in

1285, the crown fell to his granddaughter MARGARET, a young girl,

whose father was Eric, king of Norway. Edward formed a treaty with the

Estates of Scotland for a marriage between this princess and his son,

whom he styled Prince of Wales. Unfortunately, the young lady died on

her voyage to Scotland; and the crown was left to be disputed by a

multitude of distant relations, of whom JOHN BALIOL and ROBERT BRUCE

seem to have the best right. Edward, being resolved to make Scotland

his own at all hazards, interfered in this dispute, and being

appointed arbitrator among the competitors, persuaded them to own in

the first place an ill-defined claim put forward by himself of the

right of paramountcy or superior sovereignty over Scotland. When this

was done, he appointed Baliol to be his vassal king, an honor which

the unfortunate man was not long permitted to enjoy. Having driven

Baliol to resistance, he invaded the country, overthrew his army, and

stripping him of his sovereignty, assumed to himself the dominion of

Scotland, as a right forfeited to him by the rebellion of his vassal.

After he had retired, a brave Scottish gentleman, named William

Wallace, raised an insurrection against his officers, and defeating

his army at Stirling in 1298, cleared the whole country of its

southern invaders. But in the succeeding year, this noble patriot was

defeated by Edward in person at Falkirk, and the English yoke was

again imposed. It may be remarked, that this could have hardly taken

place if the common people, who rose with Wallace, and who were wholly

of Celtic and Saxon origin, had been led and encouraged by the

nobility. The grandees of Scotland, and even the competitors for the

crown, being recent Norman settlers, were disposed to render obedience

to the English sovereign.

Some time after the death of Wallace, while Edward was engrossed with

the French wars, Robert Bruce, Earl of Carrick, grand son of him who

had competed with Baliol, conceived the idea of putting himself at the

head of the Scots, and endeavoring by their means at once to gain the

crown, and to recover the independence of the kingdom. After a series

of adventures, among which was the unpremeditated murder of a rival

named Comyn, Bruce caused himself, in 1306, to be crowned at Scone.

For some time after he had to skulk as a fugitive, being unable to

maintain his ground against the English officers; but at length he

became so formidable, that Edward found it necessary (1307) to lead a

large army against him. The English monarch, worn out with fatigue and

age, died on the coast of the Solway Firth, when just within sight of

Scotland, leaving his sceptre to his son Edward II. That weak and

foolish prince immediately returned to London, leaving Bruce to

contest with his inferior officers.

After several years of constant skirmishing, during which the Scottish

king was able to maintain his ground, Edward resolved to make one

decisive effort to reduce Scotland to subjection. In the summer of

1314, he invaded it with an army of 100,000 men. Bruce drew up his

troops, which were only 30,000 in number, at Bannockburn, near

Stirling. Partly by steady valor, and partly by the use of stratagems,

the Scots were victorious, and Edward fled ignominiously from the

field. The Scottish king gained an immense booty, besides securing his

crown and the independence of his country. He soon after sent his

brother Edward, with a body of troops, to Ireland, to assist the

native chiefs in resisting the English. This bold young knight was

crowned King of Ireland, and for some time held his ground against the

English forces, but was at length defeated and slain.

The weakness of Edward II was chiefly shown in a fondness for

favorites, into whose hands he committed the whole interests of his

people. The first was a low Frenchman, named Piers Gaveston, who soon

fell a victim to the indignation of the barons. The second, Hugh

Spencer, misgoverned the country for several years, till at length the

Queen and prince of Wales raised an insurrection against the king, and

caused him to be deposed, as quite unfit to reign. The Prince was then

crowned as EDWARD III (1327), being as yet only about fourteen years

of age; and in the course of a few months the degraded sovereign was

cruelly put to death in Berkeley Castle.

During the minority of the young king, the reins of government were

held by his mother and the Earl of March. Under their administration,

a peace was concluded with King Robert of Scotland, of which one of

the conditions was a full acknowledgement of the independence of the

Scottish monarchy, which had been a matter of dispute for some ages.

The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers. · 第 75 / 251 题