Plaice, soles, haddocks (fresh), skate, maids, cod, and ling (the two

last-mentioned fish in batches of threes and fours, with a string passed

through the gills), are the only fish sold by auction. Fresh herrings are

sold from the vessel by the long hundred (130). They are counted from

the hold to the buyers in “warp” fives. Twopence per hundred is charged

to bring them on shore. Eels are sold by the “draft” of twenty pounds

weight—the price of the draft varying from three shillings to fifteen.

Twopence per draft is paid for “shoreing” or landing the fish from the

vessels. Sprats are sold on board the ships by the bushel. A “tindal” is

a thousand bushels of sprats. When we come to consider the vast number of

these oily, savoury little fishes that a bushel will contain, the idea

of a “tindal” of them seems perfectly Garagantuan; yet many “tindals” of

them are sold every week during the winter season—for the consumption of

sprats among the poorer classes is enormous. What says the Muse of the

Bull at Somers Town—what sweet stanzas issue from the anthology of Seven

Dials?—

“O! ’tis my delight on a Friday night,

When sprats they isn’t dear,

To fry a couple of score or so

Upon a fire clear.

“They eats so well, they bears the bell

From all the fish I knows:

Then let us eat them while we can,

Before the price is rose.”

(Chorus—ad libitum) “O! ’tis my delight,” &c.

The last two lines are replete with the poetry and philosophy of the

poorer classes: “Let us eat them while we can, before the price is rose;”

for even sprats are sometimes luxuries unattainable by the humble.

Exceedingly succulent sprats labour under the disadvantage of being

slightly unwholesome. To quote Mr. Samuel Weller’s anecdote of the remark

made by the young lady when remonstrating with the pastrycook who had

sold her a pork pie which was all fat, sprats are “rayther too rich.”

And yet how delicious they are! I have had some passably good dinners

in my time; I have partaken of _turbôt à la crême_ at the Trois Frères

Provençaux; I have eaten a _filet à la Chateaubriand_ at Bignon’s: yet

I don’t think there is a banquet in the whole repertory of Lucullus and

Apicius—a more charming red-letter night in the calendar of gastronomy,

than a sprat supper. You must have three pennyworth of sprats, a large

tablecloth is indispensable for finger-wiping purposes—for he who would

eat sprats with a knife and fork is unworthy the name of an epicure—and

after the banquet I should recommend, for purely hygienic and antibilious

reasons, the absorption of a _petit verre_ of the best Hollands.

To return. As regards salmon, nine-tenths of the aristocratic fish are

brought up by rail in barrels, and in summer packed in ice. Salmon and

salmon-trout are not subjected to the humiliation of being “knocked

down” by an auctioneer. They are disposed of “by private contract” at so

much per pound.

Of dried and smoked fish of all kinds the best come from Yarmouth; but

as regards the costermonger and street-vender—the modern “billestres,”

of dried haddocks, smoked sprats and herrings, entire or kippered—they

are little affected by the state of the cured fish market so long as they

can buy plenty of the fresh kind. The costermonger cures his fish himself

in the following manner:—He builds a little shed like a watch-box, with

wires across the upper part; and on this grating he threads his fish.

Then he makes a fire on the floor of his impromptu curing-house with coal

or mahogany dust, and smokes the fish “till done,” as the old cookery

books say. There is a dealer in the market to whom all fish-sellers

bring the skins of departed soles. He gives fourpence-halfpenny a pound

for them. They are used for refining purposes. And now for a word

concerning the crustacea and the molluscs. Of oysters there are several

kinds: Native Pearls, Jerseys, Old Barleys, and Commons. On board every

oyster-boat a business-like gentleman is present, who takes care that

every buyer of a bushel of oysters pays him fourpence. No buyer may carry

his oysters ashore himself, be he ever so able and willing. There are

regular “shoremen,” who charge fourpence a bushel for their services; so

that whatever may be the market-price of oysters, the purchaser must pay,

_nolens volens_, eightpence a bushel over and above the quoted rate.

Of mussels there are three kinds: Dutch, Exeters, and Shorehams. They are

brought to market in bags, of the average weight of three hundredweight;

each bag containing about one hundred and sixty quarts, inclusive of dirt

and stones. They are sold at from five shillings to seven shillings a

bag. Of periwinkles—or, as they are more popularly and familiarly termed,

“winkles”—there are four sorts: Scotch, Clays, Isle of Wights, and

Maidens. They are sold by the bushel, or by the “level” or gallon. Crabs

are sold by the “kit” (a long shallow basket) and by the score. Lobsters

by the score and the double.

At the “Cock,” in Love Lane, and at the “White Hart,” in Botolph Lane,

there is a boiling-house in the rear of the premises. Each boiling-house

consists of a spacious kitchen filled with immense cauldrons. Here winkle

and whelk buyers, who have neither utensils nor convenient premises

sufficient to boil at home, can have it done for them for fourpence

a bushel. Each boiling is performed separately in a wicker-basket;

crabs and lobsters may likewise be boiled at these houses. Half-a-dozen

scores of the fish are packed in a large basket, shaped like a

strawberry-pottle, a lid is put between each lot, and the hot-water

torture is inflicted at the rate of sixpence a score.

If your servant, the writer, were not precluded by the terms of his

contract from taking any natural rest, he might, pleading fatigue, retire

to bed; and, tossing on an unquiet couch, as men must do who slip between

the sheets when the blessed sun is shining, have fantastic dreams of Ned

Ward and Sir William Walworth: dream of the market-scene in “Masaniello,”

and hum a dream-reminiscence of “Behold, how brightly beams the morning!”

which, of course, like all things appertaining to dreams, has no more

resemblance to the original air than the tune the cow died of. Then

fancy that he is a supernumerary in a pantomime, and that Mr. Flexmore,

the clown, has jumped upon his shoulders, and is beating him about the

ears with a “property” codfish. Then he might be Jonah, swallowed by the

whale; and then Tobit’s fish. Then he would find himself half awake, and

repeating some lines he remembered reading years ago, scrawled in ink on

a huge placard outside the shop of Mr. Taylor, the famous fishmonger, in

Lombard Street. Yes: they ran thus—

“So the ‘Times’ takes an interest in the case of Geils;

I wish it would take some in my eels!”

What a queer fish Mr. Taylor must have been! Where is he now? Why,

he (your servant) is Taylor—Jeremy Taylor—Tom Taylor—Taylor the

water-poet—Billy Taylor—the Three Tailors of Tooley Street—Mr. Toole, the

toast-master of arts and buttered toast; and—he is asleep!

FIVE O’CLOCK A.M.—THE PUBLICATION OF THE “TIMES” NEWSPAPER.

“There she is—the great engine—she never sleeps. She has her

ambassadors in every quarter of the world—her couriers upon

every road. Her officers march along with armies, and her

envoys walk into statesmen’s cabinets. They are ubiquitous.

Yonder Journal has an agent at this minute giving bribes at

Madrid; and another inspecting the price of potatoes at Covent

Garden.”

“PENDENNIS.”

If you have no objection to the statement of the fact, I would beg to

observe that our present station on the clock face, twice round which

we have to go, is now five in the morning; and that at five a.m. the

publication of the “Times” newspaper is, to use a north-country mining

expression, in “full blast.” You abhor the politics of the journal

in question, you say: you consider the “Times” and “Evening Mail” to

be the organ of a company, with limited liability, composed of the

Emperor Alexander, Cardinal Wiseman, Baron Rothschild, Prince Aali

Pacha, Metternich, Doctor Cumming, Baring Brothers, Lord Palmerston,

Mr. Disraeli, Mr. W. J. Fox, and Miss Martineau. You are offended with

the “Times” because the editor declined to insert that last six-paged

letter from you against organ grinding. Never mind, you must come all

the same to see the paper published. For the publication of the “Times”

is a great, an enormous, a marvellous fact: none the less wonderful for

being repeated three hundred and thirteen times a-year. It is a pulsation

of London’s mighty heart, that should not be neglected. It is the daily

booming of a tocsin, which, year after year, proclaims progress, and

still progress to the nations; which is the joy bell to the good, the

passing bell to the bad, the world is blessed or cursed with; which rings

out ignorance and prejudice and superstition, and rings in knowledge

and enlightenment and truth. The “Times” is not alone in the possession

of a peal of bells of this kind; and many daily, more weekly, papers

ring out, loud and clear, to eager listeners; were your vassal not one

of the modestest of men, he would hint that for the last dozen years he

has been agitating daily and weekly a little tintinnabulum with what

lustiness his nerveless arm will let him. But hard by St. Paul’s, the

cathedral of Anglicanism, is Printing House Square, the cathedral of

Journalism, and in it hangs a bell to which Great Tom of Lincoln, Peter

of York, the Kolokol of Moscow, and our own defunct “Big Ben,” are but

as tinkling muffineers. For though the sides of the bell are only paper,

the clapper is the great public tongue; the booming sound that fills the

city every morning, and, to use the words of Mr. Walter Whitman, “utters

its barbaric youp over the house-tops of creation,” is the great Public

Voice. Bottle up your animosities, then, stifle your prejudices, and come

and hear the voice’s first faint murmur at five o’clock in the morning.

The office of the “Times” and “Evening Mail” is, as all civilised men

should know, situated in Printing House Square and Playhouse Yard, in the

parish of St. Ann’s, Blackfriars, in the city of London. Now this is very

pleasant and comfortable information, and is fit matter for a studious

man to lay to heart; and there exists but one little drawback to mar the

felicity which one must naturally feel at having the style and title of

the press’s great champions’ _habitat_ so patly at one’s fingers’ ends.

The drawback—the kink in the cable, the hyssop in the wine-cup, the thorn

to the rose—is that, with the exception of Honey Lane market and Little

Chester Street, Pimlico, Printing House Square is the most difficult

locality to find in all London. It is not much use asking your way to

it; a map of London, however elaborate, would not be of the slightest

assistance to you in discovering it: it will avail you little even to be

told that it is close to Apothecaries’ Hall, for where, I should like

to know, is that huge musty caravanserai of drugs, and who is to find

it at a short notice? And the intimation that Printing House Square is

not far from Puddle Dock, would not, I opine, render you great service,

intimate as might be your acquaintance with the shores of the river, both

above and below bridge, and would be scarcely more lucid a direction

than the intimation that the London terminus of the South-Western

Railway was close to Pedlars’ Acre. The “Times” newspaper is somewhere

near all these places; and it is likewise within a stone’s throw from

Ludgate Hill, and not far from St. Paul’s, and within a minute’s walk of

Fleet Street, and contiguous to Blackfriars Bridge, close handy to Earl

Street, and no great distance from Chatham Place. Yet, for all this,

the “Times” office might be, to the uninitiated, just as well placed in

the centre of the Cretan labyrinth, or the maze at Hampton Court, or

the budget of a Chancellor of the Exchequer. The best way to reach the

office is to take any turning to the south side of London Bridge, or

the east of Bridge Street, Blackfriars, and then trust to chance. The

probabilities are varied. Very likely you will find yourself entangled

in a seemingly hopeless net-work of narrow streets; you will be jostled

into chandlers’ shops, vilified by boys unctuous, black, and reeking

from the printing-machine; pursued by costermongers importuning you to

purchase small parcels of vegetables; and, particularly after sundown,

your life will be placed in jeopardy by a Hansom cab bouncing up or down

the narrow thoroughfare, of course on its way to the “Times” office,

and on an errand of life and death; the excited politician inside,

frantically offering the cabman (he, even, doesn’t know the way to the

“Times,” and has just asked it of a grimy cynic, smoking a pipe in front

of a coal and potato shed) extra shillings for speed. The grimy cynic,

perhaps from sheer malevolence of disposition, perhaps from the ruffling

of his temper naturally incidental to his being asked the same question

about five hundred times every day, answers morosely that he believes

the Hoffice is in Bummondsey, but he’s blest if he knows hanything more

about it. He will have bad times of it, that grimy cynic, I perpend,

for telling such fibs. Still struggle on manfully, always like the

nautical gentleman in the blue pilot jacket who had had so many domestic

afflictions, and exhorted the passenger to “go down, go down.” Never mind

the regiments of gallinacea that board in the gutter and lodge in the

adjacent coal-cellars, and peck at your feet as though they could relish

your corns. Never mind the infants of tender years who come tumbling

between your legs, sprawl, howling, at your feet, and cast around

appealing glances, which draw cries of “shame!” from vengeful family-men

who have never set eyes on you before, but who evidently regard you as a

peripatetic ogre, going about, of malice prepense, to trip up children.

Never mind the suffocating odour of second-hand fish, vegetables, fruit,

coal-dust, potato sacks, the adjacent gasworks, gum-benzoin, hartshorn,

opium, and other medicaments from Apothecaries’ Hall. Never mind the

noises of dogs barking, of children that are smacked by their parents

or guardians for crying, and then, of course, roar louder; of boys

yelling the insufferable “Old Dog Tray,” the abominable “Keemo Kimo,” the

hideous “Hoomtoomdoodendoo,” and rattling those abhorrent instruments

of discord, the “bones;” of women scolding, quarrelling, or shrieking

domestic calumnies of Mrs. Armstrong in connection with Bill Boosker,

nicknamed the “Lively Flea,” from garret-windows across the street; of

men growling, and wagon-wheels rumbling, and from distant forges the

yell of the indignant anvil as the ruthless hammer smites it, and the

great bar of iron is beaten flat, the sparks flying up, rejoicing in a

red “ha-ha!” at the ferruginous defeat. Never mind the dangers of hoop,

“hopscotch,” “fly-the-garter,” “thread-the-needle,” “trip-the-baker,”

“tipcat,” and “shove-halfpenny,” for the carrying out of which exciting

and amusing games the juvenile population entirely monopolise what spare

strips of pavement there are. Trust on, be not afraid, keep struggling;

and it is five hundred to one that you will eventually turn up Printing

House Square, over against the “Times” office. How ever the leviathan of

the press manages to breathe in this close, stifling, elbow-hampering

neighbourhood, has always puzzled me, and has puzzled, I daresay, a great

many wiser than I. How do the archbishops in their coaches and six (it

is well known that those gorgeous prelates write the leading articles,

carrying the necessary stationery in their mitres, and wiping their pens

on their black silk aprons—the B—p of O—x—d, however, always writes with

a pastoral crozier, dipped in milk and honey, or a lamb’s fleece—and

come down to the office at a quarter past nine every evening to correct

their proofs) contrive to squeeze their broad-shouldered equipages

through these bye-lanes? How can the sub-editor’s four-in-hand pass, the

city correspondent’s comfortable yellow chariot, nay, even the modest

broughams of the compositors? Why does not the “Times” burst forth from

the shell it has grown too large for, and plant its standard on the hill

of Ludgate, or by the side of Cheap,—if it must needs be in the city? The

area of Lincoln’s Inn Fields would be perhaps the most suitable locality

for a new office; but it is indubitable that unless the “leading journal”

retrogress and contract its operation, they will have, some day, to pull

down the choking little nests of back-streets which surround and hem it

in, even as they had to pull down the wall of the dock, bodily, in order

to let the _Great Britain_ steam-ship out.

What a contrast sequestered Printing House Square, with its old-fashioned

aspect, its quiet, dingy-looking houses, its clump of green trees within

a railing to the left, presents to the gurgling, gasping neighbourhood

which stands in such close propinquity to it! Here is the great brainpan

of journalism; the centre of newspaper activity, the prefecture of

police of the public press. Absolutely necessary is it that it should

be entirely a secret police, the “awful, shadowy, irresponsible, and

yet _puissant_ we” should dominate over the columns of the daily

journal. Will a time ever come, I wonder, when a man will sign his own

articles in a newspaper; receive his reward for honesty, his censure

for tergiversation, from the public? Will a strange day of revolution

ever arrive, when the mystic “we” shall be merged into the responsible,

tax-paying, tangible, palpable, shootable, suicidable, and kickable “I?”

Perhaps never; perhaps such a consummation would be disastrous. Old

Cobbett, in one of his screeds of passionate contempt in his “gridiron”

paper the “Register,” once said that he should like to have all the

newspaper editors and correspondents in London assembled in Hyde Park,

in order that from their personal appearance the public might judge

by what a disreputable-looking set of fellows they were hoodwinked

and nose-led. There would be no need to hold such a gathering in this

scene-painting age. Walk but into any fashionable photographic studio,

and you shall find all the “sommités” of the press neatly collectionised,

and stuck on pasteboard in the show-room portfolio; and if you entreat

the photographer’s pretty wife civilly, she will point out to you

Doctor Copperbolt of the “Thunderer,” and Bill Hornblower of the “Penny

Trumpet,” in their habit as they live.

Printing House Square is to me interesting at all times of the day and

night. In the afternoon, the dullest period of its existence, when the

compositors are gone away, the editors not come, the last number of the

last edition of the day’s sheet printed, and the mighty steam-engine

for a time hushed, I wander into its precincts often; make some small

pretexts of taking out a slip of paper, and wending my way towards the

advertising department; but soon retrace my steps, and, to tell the

truth, moon about the square in such a suspicious and prowling manner,

that if they kept any spoons on the premises, I should most probably be

ordered off by the compositor on duty. This was Playhouse Yard too, once,

was it—nay, is still; but where is the old playhouse—the Globe Theatre,

Blackfriars, if I mistake not? Not a vestige, not a particle remains.

The fourth estate has swallowed it all up. The Press Dragon of Wantley

has devoured everything; and the “Times” seems omnipotent in its home by

Puddle Dock. Look over the door of the advertisement office. Above that

portal is a handsome marble slab, a votive tablet, in commemoration of a

great victory the “Times” once gained, not a legal victory, but one of

power and influence with the people, and especially with the commercial

community, by its exposure, anent the trial of Bogle _v._ Lawson, of the

most extensive and remarkable fraudulent conspiracy ever brought to light

in the mercantile world. The “Times” refused to be reimbursed for the

heavy costs with which its proprietors had been saddled in defending the

action brought by Mr. Bogle, a banker at Florence, against the publisher

of the “Times,” Mr. Lawson. But a subscription, amounting to £2,700, had

been raised, and this handsome sum, which the “Times” proprietors refused

to accept, was at last laid out in the foundation of two scholarships

at Christ’s Hospital and the City of London School, for the benefit of

pupils of those institutions proceeding to the universities of Oxford

and Cambridge. Do you remember—are you old enough to remember—the famous

case of Bogle _versus_ Lawson, reader? It would take me five times the

space I can spare for this paper to give you even the outline of the

history of the monstrous fraud from which that action grew. Suffice

it now to say, that Mr. Bogle had been mixed up—it has been since

established innocently—in the great continental letter of credit forging

system, invented, carried out, and pursued with consummate success by an

accomplished scoundrel, the Marquis de Bourbel, who, when the felonious

bubble at length burst, and the fraud was detected, was in nowise cast

down or abashed by that discovery that had come, and the punishment that

seemed imminent, but with admirable strategy called in his outlying

pickets of countesses, actresses—_demi-monde_ adventuresses—couriers,

and sham English milords, who had been scouring the Continent changing

his forged letters of credit, and, after the unutterable impudence of

an appearance in court during the “Times” trial, gracefully retired

into private life. I, the scribe, _moi qui vous parle_, have lived in

the same house with this great man. It was at a hairdresser’s shop in

the Regent’s Quadrant, and in an upper chamber of the house in question

did the gallant marquis, assisted by a distinguished countess, who had

formerly danced on stilts, and an English copper-plate engraver, work

off the proofs of his wicked paper money from the counterfeited plates.

I should like to know what became eventually of the Marquis de Bourbel:

whether his lordship was, in the ripeness of his time, guillotined,

garotted, hanged, or knouted. I go for Siberia and the knout, for, from

the peculiar conformation of his lordship’s character, I don’t think it

possible that he could have refrained for long from forgery. We should

have heard of him, I think, had he come to grief in Western Europe;

but Russian bank-notes are very easy to forge, and Russian prisons and

prisoners are seldom brought before the public eye. They manage those

little things better, and keep them nice and cozy and quiet; and so I go

for Siberia and the knout.

Twice round the clock; or, The hours of the day and night in London · 第 2 / 37 段