CHAPTER XXXII.

THE FORMER GOVERNOR IN LEAGUE WITH DACOITS—TROUBLE ON THE

FRONTIER—DACOITING BOATS—ADVICE TO A MISSIONARY—THE GOVERNOR OF

PETCHABURI—A PETITION TO THE KING—ROBBING THE PEOPLE—MISGOVERNMENT

OF A SIAMESE PROVINCE—MISSIONARY’S OPINION OF THE KING—EXTRAORDINARY

FLOODS IN SIAM—THE SEASONS—FLOOD OF 1878: VILLAGES WASHED AWAY—FLOOD

OF 1831—ENTERING THE PALACE IN BOATS—BOAT-JOURNEYS FROM AND TO

BANGKOK.

As soon as the boats were made fast to the bank, I called on Mr Stevens,

and fortunately found him at home. He proved a highly intelligent man,

well acquainted with the people and their manners and customs. He said

the governor of Raheng was the pick of the flock of Siamese officials,

and one of the few that was allowed an adequate salary, which had been

granted him by the king so that he might not be induced to take to the

evil practices of his predecessor, which had given rise to frequent

complaints on the part of the British Government.

The late governor was a bandit in disguise. He was notoriously in league

with the dacoits who infested his province, which neighbours our

frontier, and his proceedings had been laid bare in a police case which

was reported in the English newspaper at Bangkok. In the issue for March

1873 it was related that two men, Tah and Nai Ruan, whilst at a theatre

near the governor of Raheng’s residence, seeing the servants of one of

the new governor’s deputies loading a boat with goods, learned that the

deputy was going to Bangkok. They then proceeded to a rest-house in a

neighbouring village, and informed five others of their crew, one of

whom was named Chi. Whilst conversing on the matter, Chi remarked to

Tah: “When Pra Intakeeree [the former governor] was still in Taht

[Raheng] we were in the habit of committing robberies, selling the

plunder, and dividing the money thus acquired with Pra Intakeeree. If at

any time complaints were made against us, Pra Intakeeree assisted us,

and exonerated us from criminality. This ally of ours is now under

accusation at Bangkok; we have no protector; we cannot enter the town,

and must wander hither and thither in concealment: we must commit and

multiply daring robberies, and thus make it manifestly true that Pra

Intakeeree was not the patron of thieves. This will be the cause of his

return to Taht, to be again our patron and protector.” They accordingly

waylaid the boat, fired into it, wounded the deputy and one of his

children and killed a slave, and afterwards plundered the boat.

I heard many similar stories of the governors of the Siamese provinces.

For instance, one of the missionaries whom I met in Bangkok was loud in

his complaints about the evil doings of the governor of Petchaburi, a

missionary station to the west of the Gulf of Siam, who was a brother of

the Foreign Minister. He told me that when talking with the abbot of the

monastery at that place about the power of Christianity in inducing men

to lead virtuous lives, the abbot turned smilingly to him and begged him

to concentrate all his labours upon the governor, because that personage

was the perpetrator, by himself or by his crew, of most of the ill deeds

in the province.

Four petitions had been thrown into the Mission-house by the people, one

of which had been forwarded by my friend to the king, who despatched

three commissioners to inquire into the case, the head one being reputed

to be the honestest and most fearless man in Siam.

The commissioners stayed about six months, investigating various

charges, and convicted 70 criminals, 27 of whom were the jailers,

constables, and slaves of the governor. One of the men, named “Chat,”

had been convicted of murder by the governor, and should have been sent

to Bangkok for execution, but having bribed the governor with seven

catties (£56 sterling), he was allowed to roam about in chains, the

anklets of which he could remove at will, as they were made of lead

instead of iron. The complaints against the governor and Chat are summed

up in the following petition, which was translated for me by the

missionary:—

“_April 6, 1883._

“We, Siamese, Laos, and Peguans, have consulted together as to our

troubles. We believe the missionaries are wise, and are able to bring

happiness to us. The Chinese tax-collectors receive but small

salaries, therefore squeeze sums from the poor people. We complained

to the governor of this province, but the tax-collectors had already

bribed his Excellency, who therefore replied to his subjects: ‘You

must pay according to the demands of the tax-collectors

[monopolists].’ Thus they have great gain to send to China, and no

benefit occurs to our country. The missionaries have never been known

to impose upon any one, but desire all may be happy; teaching all to

be wise, and freely caring for the sick and needy. Because of this we

have had some happiness. We therefore beg you to help us now.

“At this time there is great trouble among the citizens of Petchaburi.

Thieves and robbers are shooting many men and women. Liberated

prisoners in chains, and some whose chains have been loosed, are

plundering houses. Some of them are slaves of the governor. One named

Chat, a notorious robber, freed from prison and now a slave of the

governor, is prowling about, daily committing highway robberies all

the way from the large bridge to Ta Ching, both from boats and on

shore, never ceasing.

“Morning and evening the slaves of the governor, having been

liberated, go to the temple Bandi It, the temple Chap Prie, the temple

Poue, the temple Chan, and the temple Yai, and plunder various things,

gold and jewels from the women, and as the women are bringing their

sugar to market they seize it. The owners of the sugar recognise the

thieves as slaves of the governor, and complained to the governor’s

head-wife, who brought out the parties not concerned. The sugar-women

said these are not the parties. Then the governor’s mother charged the

sugar-women with making false accusations, and threw them into prison,

compelling them to pay seven and a half dollars before liberating

them.

“Thieves have stolen our cattle. The governor’s mother received the

said cattle. They were found in her possession, and proved to be ours.

Notwithstanding this, we had to pay large sums to secure them. She is

also accustomed to take bribes from litigants. The case then enters

the court, and if not decided according to the bribe, she exercises

her authority and sees that it is so decided.

“Litigants in his Excellency’s courts, where cases are as yet pending,

are required to render his Excellency service; if they refuse, wages

equal to the service are exacted from them. His Excellency sends

prisoners to cut bamboos belonging to citizens in the province, and

sells or uses the same. They also go to bridges, halls, and temples to

steal boards and timber to be used as fuel at his Excellency’s place.

If you doubt this, we beg you to go and inquire at Temple Chang. The

slaves of the governor’s head-wife have stolen from this temple, and

even defiantly cursed the monks, and thrown stones against the

monasteries. Her slaves have also stolen cattle, and placed them at

her fields, Na Kok Sanook. The owners have traced their cattle to the

said fields, but dare not take them, and sought to redeem them and

failed. At these fields cattle are constantly butchered.

“Again, when the season arrives for flooding the rice-fields, the

head-wife shuts off the canals so as to secure the water to her

fields. Thus the farmers cannot secure water for their fields until

hers are all worked. She is also accustomed to send out officers and

draft farmers to till and harvest her fields. She has no mercy on the

farmers. Her cattle are permitted to go over the rice-fields adjoining

hers and graze upon the growing rice. On the owners complaining, she

told them to drive the cattle away, and on their doing so, had them

thrown into prison until they paid money to gain their liberty. Many

persons have been thus arrested, oppressed, and hindered from work.

“We can no longer send our children to herd our cattle. Cattle have

been forced from our children in as many as three or four different

places in a day. They even come and steal our cattle from under our

houses at night. These cattle-thieves are the governor’s slaves and

prisoners. Even a prisoner guilty of murder, plunder, and highway

robbery has, for a consideration, been released by the governor, and

is now plundering boats and houses along the markets. His name is

Chat; he is now a slave of the head-wife.

“The cattle-thieves have been caught by the owners and handed over to

the governor, their only punishment being four or five days’

imprisonment. The chains were then taken off, the thieves were posted

to deny the theft to the last, and the suit was decided according to

his Excellency’s interest. The informers have at such times been held

at the governor’s place, and been compelled to work night and day as

though they were prisoners.

“At times we have been compelled to watch the prisoners, the prisoners

having been previously advised to flee; this being done, the

complainants have been thrown into prison instead of the prisoners.

This being the case, who can dare to seize the governor’s slaves on

charge of theft? Whilst the owners were thus wrongfully in prison, the

stolen cattle were sold. The owners have then gone to the buyers and

proved their cattle, and begged to be allowed to redeem them, but the

buyers refused. The owners have wept over their loss, not knowing what

to do. Cattle-boats have taken away our cattle, one and two boat-loads

a day. How can we be happy? We beg to take you as our refuge. Give us

peace, we pray; our hearts are filled with sorrow. It is of no use to

cry to his Excellency!

“There is no one to catch the robbers and bring them to justice. Tow

Poo Chow (the governor’s son) sends out police at night. But these

police are simply litigants, who work all day for his Excellency. The

litigants bring the cases before Tow Poo Chow, but he is indifferent,

and uses the litigants for his own purposes. The day police are

instructed to arrest all persons carrying knives, and fine each

offender two and a half dollars. If we carry our tool knives (for

cutting bamboos, &c.) we are arrested. But the governor’s people are

allowed to carry knives, swords, and guns, and none dare arrest them.

“They go about oppressing the people. If we have meetings for

merit-making, weddings, and hair-cuttings, they attend to curse us,

and act like rowdies. These days are not like those of his Excellency

the Kromatah [the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the former governor of

the province]. It is beyond all endurance. We are but common people;

we cannot write well, and beg you to put this in good form. We of the

three languages [Siamese, Laos, and Peguans] have been greatly

oppressed. We beg to take you as our refuge. We beg you to hear our

words that we may have peace.”

In sending me the translation of the petition, the missionary stated

that “the petition was much longer than this, but with similar charges.

It contains the request that it may be placed before his Majesty.” And

he says: “I sent the enclosed document to his Majesty. The king replied

through his private secretary, expressing approval of my action, and

determination to send a commission to root out the matter. The

commissioners came, and were successful, finding things worse even than

the petition stated. They also captured about seventy of the most

notorious murderers and robbers. These are at present enjoying prison

fare in Bangkok; but, strange to say, the governor is free, or at least

virtually free. He is on trial, but at the same time in his place as

governor. I fully believe his Majesty desires the peace and prosperity

of his subjects; but much is concealed from H.M.’s eyes, and underlings

are greedy for filthy lucre, and at the same time inefficient.”

While conversing about the country, Mr Stevens told me that in making

railways in the plains of Siam, the occasional extraordinary rise of the

rivers, and the consequent inundation of the country, would necessitate

high embankments. At Raheng, in November 1878, he had the opportunity of

observing the highest flood that had happened during the lifetime of the

inhabitants. In the plains of Siam, from November to May, scarcely a

cloud obscures the sky, and no rain falls except in January, when the

Siamese look for a shower, which is necessary for certain kinds of fruit

which are then forming. From November to February the weather is

delightful, being the cool season; but the thermometer is seldom lower

than 64°. Even in March and April, the hottest months, the thermometer

in Bangkok seldom rises above 98°. From November to May the north-east

monsoon blows constantly; and from May to November is the wet season,

when the south-west monsoon occurs, and showers fall almost every day.

The rainfall in Bangkok during ten years’ observations was found to vary

between 39 and 73¼ inches, giving an average of less than 56 inches

against 182 inches on the parallel coast of Burmah.

Rain being an unusual occurrence in Siam in November, Mr Stevens noted

in his diary that on the 6th inst. it rained heavily throughout the day,

many logs of timber were drifting down the river, and that the water,

topping the banks, inundated the city. During the night the river rose

three feet, and rain continuing throughout the next day, the inundation

increased, and the elephants were removed to the high ground. On Friday

the 7th, the heavy rain continued, and there was a great rush of water

from the hills at the back of his house, carrying everything before it;

fruit-trees and the slab palisade, besides 40 of his teak-logs, being

washed away, and the floating grass drifted off the lake at the back of

his house; and the house, although built on posts well rooted in the

ground, was in great danger. In the evening he removed what he could

into boats, and left for the night. Several of the villages in the

neighbourhood were swept away, the houses floating down the river with

the people in them. There had never been such a rise since Raheng was

founded.

Some of the governor’s buildings were destroyed; rafts of timber were

drifting past from Lakon; and the inhabitants of Raheng and the

neighbouring villages all took refuge in their boats. The river rose two

feet above the floor of his house, or 8½ feet above the river-bank.

Several rafts broke up below the city, and 140 houses were washed away.

The next morning was fine, and the people returned to their houses, as

the water was falling rapidly. The flood rose seven feet in twenty

hours, and on its fall left a creek three feet deep on each side of his

house. There was a great loss of property. Rice was not to be had, and

many of the people found themselves starving on the Monday. The flood

continued right down to Bangkok, and rose 10½ feet on the fields a

gunshot distance to the west of the river at Kamphang Pet, 4½ feet on

the fields to the east, and the same height under the governor’s house

at that place.

In the ‘Siam Repository’ for July 1873, there is a description of the

great inundation which occurred in 1831, which, like the flood described

by Mr Stevens, was due to heavy rainfall in the north. The flood lay

from three-quarters of a fathom to one and a half fathom on the

rice-fields of the northern provinces, varying with the height of the

land. Plowing southwards, it swamped the low lands in the neighbourhood

of Ayuthia, the former capital of Siam, to the varying depths of one and

three fathoms, and the rice-fields and orchards of Bangkok to from

three-quarters to one and a quarter fathom.

Within Bangkok the surface of the ground was covered to the depths of

half and three-quarters of a fathom; and noblemen, great and small,

whose duties required them to visit the king, paddled their boats to the

doors of the inner palace buildings. Between Bangkok and Ayuthia, as the

flood rose above the floors, which are raised several feet from the

ground, the people elevated a temporary floor, and made egress and

ingress through the windows. Some were obliged to erect the floor upon

the roof-beams of their houses, and to enter and leave by the

gable-ends. The great plains looked like a sea; and one night during a

storm the drifting masses of floating plants, gathering against some

houses, swept them away, many of the sleeping occupants perishing.

Boats from Raheng to Bangkok take from 6 to 8 days in the rains, and

from 12 to 15 days in the dry season. Returning from Bangkok, boats take

20 days in the rains, and from 30 to 35 days in the dry season. They are

longer proceeding up-stream in the dry season than in the rains, owing

to the shallowness of the stream, and the numerous sandbanks in its bed.

A thousand miles on an elephant in the Shan States · 第 32 / 37 章