FOOTNOTE:

[1] When Cisalpine Gaul became completely Romanized, it was often

known as "Gallia Togata," while the Province was distinguished as

"Gallia Bracata" (_bracae_, incorrectly _braccae_, "trousers"), from

the long trousers worn by the inhabitants, and the rest of Gaul as

"Gallia Comata," from the inhabitants wearing their hair long.

GAULT, in geology, one of the members of the Lower Cretaceous System.

The name is still employed provincially in parts of England for a stiff

blue clay of any kind; by the earlier writers it was sometimes spelt

"Galt" or "Golt."

The formation now known as Gault in England has been variously

designated "Blue Marle," "Brick Earth," "Golt Brick Earth" and

"Oak-tree-soil." In certain parts of the south of England the Gault

appears as a well-marked deposit of clay, lying between two sandy

formations; the one above came to be known as the "Upper Greensand," the

one below being the "Lower Greensand" (see GREENSAND). Since the typical

clayey Gault is continually taking on a sandy facies as it is traced

both horizontally and vertically; and since the fossils of the Upper

Greensand and Gault are inseparably related, it has been proposed by

A.J. Jukes-Browne that these two series of beds should be regarded as

the arenaceous and argillaceous phases of a single formation, to which

he has given the name "Selbornian" (from the village of Selborne where

the beds are well developed). Lithologically, then, the Selbornian

includes the blue and grey clays and marls of the Gault proper; the

glauconitic sands of the Upper Greensand, and their local equivalent,

the "malm," "malm rock" or "firestone," which in places passes into the

micaceous sandstone containing sponge spicules and globules of silica,

the counterpart of the rock called "gaize" on the same horizon in

northern France. In Yorkshire, Lincolnshire and parts of Norfolk the

Selbornian is represented by the Red Chalk. The malm is a ferruginous

siliceous rock, the silica being mainly in the colloidal condition in

the form of globules and sponge spicules; some quartz grains, mica and

glauconite are usually present along with from 2 to 25% of calcareous

matter. Chert-bands and nodules are common in the Upper Greensand of

certain districts; and calcareous concretions, locally recognized as

cowstones (Lyme Regis), doggers or buhrstones, are not infrequent.

The principal divisions of the Selbornian stage with their

characteristic zonal fossils are as follows:--

Warminster Beds _Pecten asper_ and _Cardiaster fossarius_.

Upper Gault Devizes Beds or Merstham Beds with

_Schloenbachia rostralus_.

/ _Hoplites lautus._

Lower Gault < _H. interruptus._

\ _Acanthoceras mammillatum._

The Gault (with Upper Greensand) crops out all round the Wealden area;

it extends beneath the London basin and reappears from beneath the

northern scarp of the Chalk along the foot of the Chiltern Hills to

near Tring. In the south of England the Gault clay is fairly constant

in the lower part, with the Greensand above; the clay, however, passes

into sand as it is followed westward and, as already pointed out, the

clay and sand appear to pass into a red chalk towards the north-east.

The Gault overlaps the Lower Greensand towards the east, where it

rests upon the old Paleozoic axis; it also overlaps the same formation

towards the west about Frome, and thence passes unconformably across

the Portlandian beds, Kimeridge Clay, Corallian beds and Oxford Clay;

in south Dorsetshire it rests upon the Wealden Series. The Gault (with

Upper Greensand) passes on to the Jurassic and Rhaetic rocks near

Axmouth, and oversteps farther westward, in the Haldon Hills, on to

the Permian. A large outlier occurs on the Blackdown Hills of

Devonshire. Good localities for fossils are Folkestone--where many of

the shells are preserved with their original pearly nacre,--Burnham,

Merstham, Isle of Wight, the Blackdown and Haldon Hills, Warminster,

Hunstanton and Speeton, Black Venn near Lyme Regis, and Devizes

(malmstone and gaize). The beds are well developed in the vale of

Wardour, and in the Isle of Wight; the Gault forms the so-called "blue

slipper" at Ventnor which has been the cause of the landslip or

undercliff.

The Gault of north France is very similar to that in the south of

England, but the French term _Albien_ includes only a portion of the

Selbornian formation. The Gault of north-west Germany embraces beds

that would be classed as _Albien_ and _Aptien_ by French authors; it

comprises the "Flammenmergel"--a pale siliceous marl shot with

flame-shaped darker patches--a clay with _Belemnites minimus_, and the

"Gargasmergel" (Aptian). In the Diester and Teutoberger Wald, and in

the region of Halberstadt, the clays and marls are replaced by

sandstones, the so-called _Gault-Quader_. Continental writers usually

place the Gault or Albian at the summit of the Lower Cretaceous; while

with English geologists the practice is to commence the Upper

Cretaceous with this formation. In addition to the fossils already

noticed, the following may be mentioned: _Acanthoceras Desmoceras

Beaudanti, Hoplites splendens, Hamites, Scaphites, Turrilites,

Aporrhais retusa, Trigonia aliforme_, also _Ichthyosaurus_ and

_Ornithocheirus_ (Pterodactyl). From the clays, bricks and tiles are

made at Burham, Barnwell, Dunton Green, Arlesey, Hitchin, &c. The

cherts in the Greensand portion are used for road metal, and in the

Blackdown Hills, for scythe stones; hearthstone is obtained about

Merstham; phosphatic nodules occur at several horizons.

See CRETACEOUS SYSTEM; ALBIAN; APTIAN; also A.J. Jukes-Browne, "The

Gault and Upper Greensand of England." vol. i., _Cretaceous Rocks of

Britain_; _Mem. Geol. Survey_, 1900.

GAUNTLET (a diminutive of the Fr. _gant_, glove), a large form of glove,

and especially the steel-plated glove of medieval armour. To "run the

gauntlet," i.e. to run between two rows of men who, armed with sticks,

rope-ends or other weapons, beat and strike at the person so running,

was formerly a punishment for military and naval offences. It was

abolished in the Prussian army by Scharnhorst. As a method of torturing

prisoners, it was employed among the North American Indians. "Gauntlet"

(earlier "gantlet") in this expression is a corruption of "gantlope,"

from a Swedish _gatlope_, from _gata_, lane, and _lopp_, a course (cf.

Ger. _gassenlaufen_, to run the gauntlet). According to the _New English

Dictionary_ the word became familiar in England at the time of the

Thirty Years' War.

GAUR, or LAKHNAUTI, a ruined city of British India, in Malda district of

Eastern Bengal and Assam. The ruins are situated about 8 m. to the south

of English Bazar, the civil station of the district of Malda, and on the

eastern bank of the Bhagirathi, an old channel of the Ganges. It is said

to have been founded by Lakshman, and its most ancient name was

Lakshmanavati, corrupted into Lakhnauti. Its known history begins with

its conquest in A.D. 1198 by the Mahommedans, who retained it as the

chief seat of their power in Bengal for more than three centuries. When

the Afghan kings of Bengal established their independence, they

transferred their seat of government (about 1350) to Pandua (q.v.), also

in Malda district, and to build their new capital they plundered Gaur of

every monument that could be removed. When Pandua was in its turn

deserted (A.D. 1453), Gaur once more became the capital under the name

of Jannatabad; it remained so as long as the Mahommedan kings retained

their independence. In A.D. 1564 Sulaiman Kirani, a Pathan adventurer,

abandoned it for Tanda, a place somewhat nearer the Ganges. Gaur was

sacked by Sher Shah in 1539, and was occupied by Akbar's general in

1575, when Daud Shah, the last of the Afghan dynasty, refused to pay

homage to the Mogul emperor. This occupation was followed by an outbreak

of the plague, which completed the downfall of the city, and since then

it has been little better than a heap of ruins, almost overgrown with

jungle.

The city in its prime measured 7½ m. from north to south, with a breadth

of 1 to 2 m. With suburbs it covered an area of 20 to 30 sq. m., and in

the 16th century the Portuguese historian Faria y Sousa described it as

containing 1,200,000 inhabitants. The ramparts of this walled city,

which was surrounded by extensive suburbs, still exist; they were works

of vast labour, and were on the average about 40 ft. high, and 180 to

200 ft. thick at the base. The facing of masonry and the buildings with

which they were covered have now disappeared, and the embankments

themselves are overgrown with dense jungle. The western side of the city

was washed by the Ganges, and within the space enclosed by these

embankments and the river stood the city of Gaur proper, with the fort

containing the palace in its south-west corner. Radiating north, south

and east from the city, other embankments are to be traced running

through the suburbs and extending in certain directions for 30 or 40 m.

Surrounding the palace is an inner embankment of similar construction to

that which surrounds the city, and even more overgrown with jungle. A

deep moat protects it on the outside. To the north of the outer

enbankment lies the Sagar Dighi, a great reservoir, 1600 yds. by 800

yds., dating from A.D. 1126.

Fergusson in his _History of Eastern Architecture_ thus describes the

general architectural style of Gaur:--"It is neither like that of Delhi

nor Jaunpore, nor any other style, but one purely local and not without

considerable merit in itself; its principal characteristic being heavy

short pillars of stone supporting pointed arches and vaults in

brick--whereas at Jaunpore, for instance, light pillars carried

horizontal architraves and flat ceilings." Owing to the lightness of the

small, thin bricks, which were chiefly used in the making of Gaur, its

buildings have not well withstood the ravages of time and the weather;

while much of its enamelled work has been removed for the ornamentation

of the surrounding cities of more modern origin. Moreover, the ruins

long served as a quarry for the builders of neighbouring towns and

villages, till in 1900 steps were taken for their preservation by the

government. The finest ruin in Gaur is that of the Great Golden Mosque,

also called Bara Darwaza, or twelve-doored (1526). An arched corridor

running along the whole front of the original building is the principal

portion now standing. There are eleven arches on either side of the

corridor and one at each end of it, from which the mosque probably

obtained its name. These arches are surmounted by eleven domes in fair

preservation; the mosque had originally thirty-three.

The Small Golden or Eunuch's mosque, in the ancient suburb of Firozpur,

has fine carving, and is faced with stone fairly well preserved. The

Tantipara mosque (1475-1480) has beautiful moulding in brick, and the

Lotan mosque of the same period is unique in retaining its glazed tiles.

The citadel, of the Mahommedan period, was strongly fortified with a

rampart and entered through a magnificent gateway called the Dakhil

Darwaza (?1459-1474). At the south-east corner was a palace, surrounded

by a wall of brick 66 ft. high, of which a part is standing. Near by

were the royal tombs. Within the citadel is the Kadam Rasul mosque

(1530), which is still used, and close outside is a tall tower called

the Firoz Minar (perhaps signifying "tower of victory"). There are a

number of Mahommedan buildings on the banks of the Sagar Dighi,

including, notably, the tomb of the saint Makhdum Shaikh Akhi Siraj (d.

1357), and in the neighbourhood is a burning ghat, traditionally the

only one allowed to the use of the Hindus by their Mahommedan

conquerors, and still greatly venerated and frequented by them. Many

inscriptions of historical importance have been found in the ruins.

See M. Martin (Buchanan Hamilton), _Eastern India_, vol. iii. (1831);

G.H. Ravenshaw, _Gaur_ (1878); James Fergusson, _History of Indian and

Eastern Architecture_ (1876); _Reports of the Archaeological Surveyor,

Bengal Circle_ (1900-1904).

GAUR, the native name of the wild ox, _Bos (Bibos) gaurus_, of India,

miscalled bison by sportsmen. The gaur, which extends into Burma and the

Malay Peninsula, where it is known as seladang, is the typical

representative of an Indo-Malay group of wild cattle characterized by

the presence of a ridge on the withers, the compressed horns, and the

white legs. The gaur, which reaches a height of nearly 6 ft. at the

shoulder, is specially characterized by the forward curve and great

elevation of the ridge between the horns. The general colour is

blackish-grey. Hill-forests are the resort of this species.

GAUSS, KARL FRIEDRICH (1777-1855), German mathematician, was born of

humble parents at Brunswick on the 30th of April 1777, and was indebted

for a liberal education to the notice which his talents procured him

from the reigning duke. His name became widely known by the publication,

in his twenty-fifth year (1801), of the _Disquisitiones arithmeticae_.

In 1807 he was appointed director of the Göttingen observatory, an

office which he retained to his death: it is said that he never slept

away from under the roof of his observatory, except on one occasion,

when he accepted an invitation from Baron von Humboldt to attend a

meeting of natural philosophers at Berlin. In 1809 he published at

Hamburg his _Theoria motus corporum coelestium_, a work which gave a

powerful impulse to the true methods of astronomical observation; and

his astronomical workings, observations, calculations of orbits of

planets and comets, &c., are very numerous and valuable. He continued

his labours in the theory of numbers and other analytical subjects, and

communicated a long series of memoirs to the Royal Society of Sciences

(_Königliche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften_) at Göttingen. His first

memoir on the theory of magnetism, _Intensitas vis magneticae terrestris

ad mensuram absolutam revocata_, was published in 1833, and he shortly

afterwards proceeded, in conjunction with Wilhelm Weber, to invent new

apparatus for observing the earth's magnetism and its changes; the

instruments devised by them were the declination instrument and the

bifilar magnetometer. With Weber's assistance he erected in 1833 at

Göttingen a magnetic observatory free from iron (as Humboldt and F.J.D.

Arago had previously done on a smaller scale), where he made magnetic

observations, and from this same observatory he sent telegraphic signals

to the neighbouring town, thus showing the practicability of an

electromagnetic telegraph. He further instituted an association

(_Magnetischer Verein_), composed at first almost entirely of Germans,

whose continuous observations on fixed term-days extended from Holland

to Sicily. The volumes of their publication, _Resultate am den

Beobachtungen des magnetischen Vereins_, extend from 1836 to 1839; and

in those for 1838 and 1839 are contained the two important memoirs by

Gauss, _Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus, and the Allgemeine

Lehrsätze_--on the theory of forces attracting according to the inverse

square of the distance. The instruments and methods thus due to him are

substantially those employed in the magnetic observatories throughout

the world. He co-operated in the Danish and Hanoverian measurements of

an arc and trigonometrical operations (1821-1848), and wrote (1843,

1846) the two memoirs _Über Gegenstände der höheren Geodäsie_. Connected

with observations in general we have (1812-1826) the memoir _Theoria

combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxia_, with a second

part and a supplement. Another memoir of applied mathematics is the

_Dioptrische Untersuchungen_ (1840). Gauss was well versed in general

literature and the chief languages of modern Europe, and was a member of

nearly all the leading scientific societies in Europe. He died at

Göttingen on the 23rd of February 1855. The centenary of his birth was

celebrated (1877) at his native place, Brunswick.

Gauss's collected works were published by the Royal Society of

Göttingen, in 7 vols. 4to (Gött., 1863-1871), edited by E.J.

Schering--(1) the _Disquisitiones arithmeticae_, (2) _Theory of

Numbers_, (3) _Analysis_, (4) _Geometry and Method of Least Squares_,

(5) _Mathematical Physics_, (6) _Astronomy_, and (7) the _Theoria

motus corporum coelestium_. Additional volumes have since been

published, _Fundamente der Geometrie usw_. (1900), and _Geodatische

Nachträge zu Band iv_. (1903). They include, besides his various works

and memoirs, notices by him of many of these, and of works of other

authors in the _Göttingen gelehrte Anzeigen_, and a considerable

amount of previously unpublished matter, _Nachlass_. Of the memoirs in

pure mathematics, comprised for the most part in vols, ii., iii. and

iv. (but to these must be added those on _Attractions_ in vol. v.), it

may be safely said there is not one which has not signally contributed

to the progress of the branch of mathematics to which it belongs, or

which would not require to be carefully analysed in a history of the

subject. Running through these volumes in order, we have in the second

the memoir, _Summatio quarundam serierum singularium_, the memoirs on

the theory of biquadratic residues, in which the notion of complex

numbers of the form a + _bi_ was first introduced into the theory of

numbers; and included in the _Nachlass_ are some valuable tables. That

for the conversion of a fraction into decimals (giving the complete

period for all the prime numbers up to 997) is a specimen of the

extraordinary love which Gauss had for long arithmetical calculations;

and the amount of work gone through in the construction of the table

of the number of the classes of binary quadratic forms must also have

been tremendous. In vol. iii. we have memoirs relating to the proof of

the theorem that every numerical equation has a real or imaginary

root, the memoir on the _Hypergeometric Series_, that on

_Interpolation_, and the memoir _Determinatio attractionis_--in which

a planetary mass is considered as distributed over its orbit according

to the time in which each portion of the orbit is described, and the

question (having an implied reference to the theory of secular

perturbations) is to find the attraction of such a ring. In the

solution the value of an elliptic function is found by means of the

_arithmetico-geometrical mean_. The _Nachlass_ contains further

researches on this subject, and also researches (unfortunately very

fragmentary) on the lemniscate-function, &., showing that Gauss was,

even before 1800, in possession of many of the discoveries which have

made the names of N.H. Abel and K.G.J. Jacobi illustrious. In vol. iv.

we have the memoir _Allgemeine Auflösung_, on the graphical

representation of one surface upon another, and the _Disquisitiones

generales circa superficies curvas_. (An account of the treatment of

surfaces which he originated in this paper will be found in the

article SURFACE.) And in vol. v. we have a memoir _On the Attraction

of Homogeneous Ellipsoids_, and the already mentioned memoir

_Allgemeine Lehrsätze_, on the theory of forces attracting according

to the inverse square of the distance. (A. Ca.)

GAUSSEN, FRANÇOIS SAMUEL ROBERT LOUIS (1790-1863), Swiss Protestant

divine, was born at Geneva on the 25th of August 1790. His father, Georg

Markus Gaussen, a member of the council of two hundred, was descended

from an old Languedoc family which had been scattered at the time of the

religious persecutions in France. At the close of his university career

at Geneva, Louis was in 1816 appointed pastor of the Swiss Reformed

Church at Satigny near Geneva, where he formed intimate relations with

J.E. Cellérier, who had preceded him in the pastorate, and also with the

members of the dissenting congregation at Bourg-de-Four, which, together

with the Église du témoignage, had been formed under the influence of

the preaching of James and Robert Haldane in 1817. The Swiss revival was

distasteful to the pastors of Geneva (_Vénérable Compagnie des

Pasteurs_), and on the 7th of May 1817 they passed an ordinance hostile

to it. As a protest against this ordinance, in 1819 Gaussen published in

conjunction with Cellérier a French translation of the Second Helvetic

Confession, with a preface expounding the views he had reached upon the

nature, use and necessity of confessions of faith; and in 1830, for

having discarded the official catechism of his church as being

insufficiently explicit on the divinity of Christ, original sin and the

doctrines of grace, he was censured and suspended by his ecclesiastical

superiors. In the following year he took part in the formation of a

_Société Évangélique_ (_Evangelische Gesellschaft_). When this society

contemplated, among other objects, the establishment of a new

theological college, he was finally deprived of his charge. After some

time devoted to travel in Italy and England, he returned to Geneva and

ministered to an independent congregation until 1834, when he joined

Merle d'Aubigné as professor of systematic theology in the college which

he had helped to found. This post he continued to occupy until 1857,

when he retired from the active duties of the chair. He died at Les

Grottes, Geneva, on the 18th of June 1863.

His best-known work, entitled _La Théopneustie ou pleine inspiration des

saintes écritures_, an elaborate defence of the doctrine of "plenary

inspiration," was originally published in Paris in 1840, and rapidly

gained a wide popularity in France, as also, through translations, in

England and America. It was followed in 1860 by a supplementary treatise

on the canon (_Le Canon des saintes écritures au double point de vue de

la science et de la foi_), which, though also popular, has hardly been

so widely read.

See the article in Herzog-Hauck, _Realencyklopädie_ (1899).

GAUTIER, ÉMILE THÉODORE LÉON (1832-1897), French literary historian, was

born at Hâvre on the 8th of August 1832. He was educated at the École

des Chartes, and became successively keeper of the archives of the

department of Haute-Marne and of the imperial archives at Paris under

the empire. In 1871 he became professor of palaeography at the École des

Chartes. He was elected member of the Academy of Inscriptions in 1887,

and became chief of the historical section of the national archives in

1893. Léon Gautier rendered great services to the study of early French

literature, the most important of his numerous works on medieval

subjects being a critical text (Tours, 1872) with translation and

introduction of the _Chanson de Roland_, and _Les Épopées françaises_ (3

vols., 1866-1867; 2nd ed., 5 vols., 1878-1897, including a

_Bibliographie des chansons de geste_). He died in Paris on the 25th of

August 1897.

GAUTIER, THÉOPHILE (1811-1872), French poet and miscellaneous writer,

was born at Tarbes on the 31st of August 1811. He was educated at the

grammar school of that town, and afterwards at the Collège Charlemagne

in Paris, but was almost as much in the studios. He very early devoted

himself to the study of the older French literature, especially that of

the 16th and the early part of the 17th century. This study qualified

him well to take part in the Romantic movement, and enabled him to

astonish Sainte-Beuve by the phraseology and style of some literary

essays which, when barely eighteen years old, he put into the critic's

hands. In consequence of this introduction he at once came under the

influence of the great Romantic _cénacle_, to which, as to Victor Hugo

in particular, he was also introduced by his gifted but ill-starred

schoolmate Gérard de Nerval. With Gérard, Petrus Borel, Corot, and many

other less known painters and poets whose personalities he has

delightfully sketched in the articles collected under the titles of

_Histoire du Romantisme_, &c., he formed a minor romantic clique who

were distinguished for a time by the most extravagant eccentricity. A

flaming crimson waistcoat and a great mass of waving hair were the

outward signs which qualified Gautier for a chief rank among the

enthusiastic devotees who attended the rehearsals of _Hernani_ with red

tickets marked "Hierro," performed mocking dances round the bust of

Racine, and were at all times ready to exchange word or blow with the

_perruques_ and _grisâtres_ of the classical party. In Gautier's case

these freaks were not inconsistent with real genius and real devotion to

sound ideals of literature. He began (like Thackeray, to whom he

presents in other ways some striking points of resemblance) as an

artist, but soon found that his true powers lay in another direction.

His first considerable poem, _Albertus_ (1830), displayed a good deal of

the extravagant character which accompanied rather than marked the

movement, but also gave evidence of uncommon command both of language

and imagery, and in particular of a descriptive power hardly to be

excelled. The promise thus given was more than fulfilled in his

subsequent poetry, which, in consequence of its small bulk, may well be

noticed at once and by anticipation. The _Comédie de la mort_, which

appeared soon after (1832), is one of the most remarkable of French

poems, and though never widely read has received the suffrage of every

competent reader. Minor poems of various dates, published in 1840,

display an almost unequalled command over poetical form, an advance even

over _Albertus_ in vigour, wealth and appropriateness of diction, and

abundance of the special poetical essence. All these good gifts reached

their climax in the _Émaux et camées_, first published in 1856, and

again, with additions, just before the poet's death in 1872. These poems

are in their own way such as cannot be surpassed. Gautier's poetical

work contains in little an expression of his literary peculiarities.

There are, in addition to the peculiarities of style and diction already

noticed, an extraordinary feeling and affection for beauty in art and

nature, and a strange indifference to anything beyond this range, which

has doubtless injured the popularity of his work.

But it was not, after all, as a poet that Gautier was to achieve either

profit or fame. For the theatre, he had but little gift, and his

dramatic efforts (if we except certain masques or ballets in which his

exuberant and graceful fancy came into play) are by far his weakest. It

was otherwise with his prose fiction. His first novel of any size, and

in many respects his most remarkable work, was _Mademoiselle de Maupin_

(1835). Unfortunately this book, while it establishes his literary

reputation on an imperishable basis, was unfitted by its subject, and in

parts by its treatment, for general perusal, and created, even in

France, a prejudice against its author which he was very far from really

deserving. During the years from 1833 onwards, his fertility in novels

and tales was very great. _Les Jeunes-France_ (1833), which may rank as

a sort of prose _Albertus_ in some ways, displays the follies of the

youthful Romantics in a vein of humorous and at the same time

half-pathetic satire. _Fortunio_ (1838) perhaps belongs to the same

class. _Jettatura_, written somewhat later, is less extravagant and more

pathetic. A crowd of minor tales display the highest literary qualities,

and rank with Mérimée's at the head of all contemporary works of the

class. First of all must be mentioned the ghost-story of _La Morte

amoureuse_, a gem of the most perfect workmanship. For many years

Gautier continued to write novels. _La Belle Jenny_ (1864) is a not very

successful attempt to draw on his English experience, but the earlier

_Militona_ (1847) is a most charming picture of Spanish life. In

_Spirite_ (1866) he endeavoured to enlist the fancy of the day for

supernatural manifestations, and a _Roman de la momie_ (1856) is a

learned study of ancient Egyptian ways. His most remarkable effort in

this kind, towards the end of his life, was _Le Capitaine Fracasse_

(1863), a novel, partly of the picaresque school, partly of that which

Dumas was to make popular, projected nearly thirty years earlier, and

before Dumas himself had taken to the style. This book contains some of

the finest instances of his literary power.

Yet neither in poems nor in novels did the main occupation of Gautier as

a literary man consist. He was early drawn to the more lucrative task of

feuilleton-writing, and for more than thirty years he was among the most

expert and successful practitioners of this art. Soon after the

publication of _Mademoiselle de Maupin_, in which he had not been too

polite to journalism, he became irrevocably a journalist. He was

actually the editor of _L'Artiste_ for a time: but his chief newspaper

connexions were with _La Presse_ from 1836 to 1854 and with the

_Moniteur_ later. His work was mainly theatrical and art criticism. The

rest of his life was spent either at Paris or in travels of considerable

extent to Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, Turkey, England, Algeria and

Russia, all undertaken with a more or less definite purpose of

book-making. Having absolutely no political opinions, he had no

difficulty in accepting the Second Empire, and received from it

considerable favours, in return for which, however, he in no way

prostituted his pen, but remained a literary man pure and simple. He

died on the 23rd of December 1872.

Accounts of his travels, criticisms of the theatrical and literary works

of the day, obituary notices of his contemporaries and, above all, art

criticism occupied him in turn. It has sometimes been deplored that this

engagement in journalism should have diverted Gautier from the

performance of more capital work in literature. Perhaps, however, this

regret springs from a certain misconception. Gautier's power was

literary power pure and simple, and it is as evident in his slightest

sketches and criticisms as in _Émaux et camées or La Morte amoureuse_.

On the other hand, his weakness, if he had a weakness, lay in his almost

total indifference to the matters which usually supply subjects for art

and therefore for literature. He has thus been accused of "lack of

ideas" by those who have not cleared their own minds of cant; and in the

recent set-back of the critical current against form and in favour of

"philosophic" treatment, comment upon him has sometimes been

unfavourable. But this injustice will, beyond all question, be redressed

again. He was neither immoral, irreligious nor unduly subservient to

despotism, but morals, religion and politics (to which we may add

science and material progress) were matters of no interest to him. He

was to all intents a humanist, as the word was understood in the 15th

century. But he was a humorist as well, and this combination, joined to

his singularly kindly and genial nature, saved him from some dangers and

depravations as well as some absurdities to which the humanist temper is

exposed. As time goes on it may be predicted that, though Gautier may

not be widely read, yet his writings will never cease to be full of

indescribable charm and of very definite instruction to men of letters.

Besides those of his works which have been already cited, we may notice

_Une Larme du diable_ (1839), a charming mixture of humour and

tenderness; _Les Grotesques_ (1844), a volume of early criticisms on

some oddities of 17th-century literature; _Caprices et zigzags_ (1845),

miscellanies dealing in part with English life; _Voyage en Espagne_

(1845), _Constantinople_ (1854), _Voyage en Russie_ (1866), brilliant

volumes of travel; _Ménagerie intime_ (1869) and _Tableaux de siège_

(1872), his two latest works, which display his incomparable style in

its quietest but not least happy form.

There is no complete edition of Gautier's works, and the vicomte

Spoelberch de Lovenjoul's _Histoire des oeuvres de Théophile Gautier_

(1887) shows how formidable such an undertaking would be. But since

his death numerous further collections of articles have been made:

_Fusains et eaux-fortes_ and _Tableaux à la plume_ (1880); _L'Orient_

(2 vols., 1881); _Les Vacances du lundi_ (new ed., 1888); _La Nature

chez elle_ (new ed., 1891). In 1879 his son-in-law, E. Bergerat, who

had married his younger daughter Estelle (the elder, Mme Judith

Gautier--herself a writer of distinction--was at one time Mme Catulle

Mendès), issued a biography, _Théophile Gautier_, which has been often

reprinted. With it should be compared Maxime du Camp's volume in the

_Grands Écrivains français_ (1890) and the numerous references in the

_Journal des Goncourt_. Critical eulogies, from Sainte-Beuve

(repeatedly in the _Causeries_) and Baudelaire (two articles in _L'Art

romantique_) downwards, are numerous. The chief of the decriers is

Émile Faguet in his _Études littéraires sur le XIX^e siècle_. In 1902

and 1903 there appeared two respectable academic _éloges_ by H. Menai

and H. Potez. (G. Sa.)

GAUTIER D'ARRAS, French _trouvère_, flourished in the second half of the

12th century. Nothing is known of his biography except what may be

gleaned from his works. He dedicated his romance of _Éracle_ to Theobald

V., count of Blois (d. 1191); among his other patrons were Marie,

countess of Champagne, daughter of Louis VII. and Eleanor of Guienne and

Baldwin IV., count of Hainaut. _Éracle_, the hero of which becomes

emperor of Constantinople as Heraclius, is purely a _roman d'aventures_

and enjoyed great popularity. His second romance, _Ille et Galeron_,

dedicated to Beatrix, the second wife of Frederick Barbarossa, treats of

a similar situation to that outlined in the lay of "_Eliduc_" by Marie

de France.

See the _Oeuvres de Gautier d'Arras_, ed. E. Löseth (2 vols., Paris,

1890); _Hist. litt. de la France_, vol. xxii. (1852); A. Dinaux, _Les

Trouvères_ (1833-1843), vol. iii.

GAUZE, a light, transparent fabric, originally of silk, and now

sometimes made of linen or cotton, woven in an open manner with very

fine yarn. It is said to have been originally made at Gaza in Palestine,

whence the name. Some of the gauzes from eastern Asia were brocaded with

flowers of gold or silver. In the weaving of gauze the warp threads, in

addition to being crossed as in plain weaving, are twisted in pairs from

left to right and from right to left alternately, after each shot of

weft, thereby keeping the weft threads at equal distances apart, and

retaining them in their parallel position. The textures are woven either

plain, striped or figured; and the material receives many designations,

according to its appearance and the purposes to which it is devoted. A

thin cotton fabric, woven in the same way, is known as leno, to

distinguish it from muslin made by plain weaving. Silk gauze was a

prominent and extensive industry in the west of Scotland during the

second half of the 18th century, but on the introduction of

cotton-weaving it greatly declined. In addition to its use for dress

purposes silk gauze is much employed for bolting or sifting flour and

other finely ground substances. The term gauze is applied generally to

transparent fabrics of whatever fibre made, and to the fine-woven

wire-cloth used in safety-lamps, sieves, window-blinds, &c.

GAVARNI, the name by which SULPICE GUILLAUME CHEVALIER (1801-1866),

French caricaturist, is known. He is said to have taken the _nom de

plume_ from the place where he made his first published sketch. He was

born in Paris of poor parents, and started in life as a workman in an

engine-building factory. At the same time he attended the free school of

drawing. In his first attempts to turn his abilities to some account he

met with many disappointments, but was at last entrusted with the

drawing of some illustrations for a journal of fashion. Gavarni was then

thirty-four years of age. His sharp and witty pencil gave to these

generally commonplace and unartistic figures a life-likeness and an

expression which soon won for him a name in fashionable circles.

Gradually he gave greater attention to this more congenial work, and

finally ceased working as an engineer to become the director of the

journal _Les Gens du monde_. His ambition rising in proportion to his

success, Gavarni from this time followed the real bent of his

inclination, and began a series of lithographed sketches, in which he

portrayed the most striking characteristics, foibles and vices of the

various classes of French society. The letterpress explanations attached

to his drawings were always short, but were forcible and highly

humorous, if sometimes trivial, and were admirably adapted to the

particular subjects. The different stages through which Gavarni's talent

passed, always elevating and refining itself, are well worth being

noted. At first he confined himself to the study of Parisian manners,

more especially those of the Parisian youth. To this vein belong _Les

Lorettes_, _Les Actrices_, _Les Coulisses_, _Les Fashionables_, _Les

Gentilshommes bourgeois_, _Les Artistes_, _Les Débardeurs_, _Clichy_,

_Les Étudiants de Paris_, _Les Baliverneries parisiennes_, _Les Plaisirs

champêtres_, _Les Bals masqués_, _Le Carnaval_, _Les Souvenirs du

carnaval_, _Les Souvenirs du bal Chicard_, _La Vie des jeunes hommes_,

_Les Patois de Paris_. He had now ceased to be director of _Les Gens du

monde_; but he was engaged as ordinary caricaturist of _Le Charivari_,

and, whilst making the fortune of the paper, he made his own. His name

was exceedingly popular, and his illustrations for books were eagerly

sought for by publishers. _Le Juif errant_, by Eugène Sue (1843, 4 vols.

8vo), the French translation of Hoffman's tales (1843, 8vo), the first

collective edition of Balzac's works (Paris, Houssiaux, 1850, 20 vols.

8vo), _Le Diable à Paris_ (1844-1846, 2 vols. 4to), _Les Français peints

par eux-mêmes_ (1840-1843, 9 vols. 8vo), the collection of

_Physiologies_ published by Aubert in 38 vols. 18mo (1840-1842),--all

owed a great part of their success at the time, and are still sought

for, on account of the clever and telling sketches contributed by

Gavarni. A single frontispiece or vignette was sometimes enough to

secure the sale of a new book. Always desiring to enlarge the field of

his observations, Gavarni soon abandoned his once favourite topics. He

no longer limited himself to such types as the _lorette_ and the

Parisian student, or to the description of the noisy and popular

pleasures of the capital, but turned his mirror to the grotesque sides

of family life and of humanity at large. _Les Enfants terribles_, _Les

Parents terribles_, _Les Fourberies des femmes_, _La Politique des

femmes_, _Les Maris vengés_, _Les Nuances du sentiment_, _Les Rêves_,

_Les Petits Jeux de société_, _Les Petits Malheurs du bonheur_, _Les

Impressions de menage_, _Les Interjections_, _Les Traductions en langue

vulgaire_, _Les Propos de Thomas Vireloque_, &c., were composed at this

time, and are his most elevated productions. But whilst showing the same

power of irony as his former works, enhanced by a deeper insight into

human nature, they generally bear the stamp of a bitter and even

sometimes gloomy philosophy. This tendency was still more strengthened

by a visit to England in 1849. He returned from London deeply impressed

with the scenes of misery and degradation which he had observed among

the lower classes of that city. In the midst of the cheerful atmosphere

of Paris he had been struck chiefly by the ridiculous aspects of

vulgarity and vice, and he had laughed at them. But the debasement of

human nature which he saw in London appears to have affected him so

forcibly that from that time the cheerful caricaturist never laughed or

made others laugh again. What he had witnessed there became the almost

exclusive subject of his drawings, as powerful, as impressive as ever,

but better calculated to be appreciated by cultivated minds than by the

public, which had in former years granted him so wide a popularity. Most

of these last compositions appeared in the weekly paper

_L'Illustration_. In 1857 he published in one volume the series entitled

_Masques et visages_ (1 vol. 12mo), and in 1869, about two years after

his death, his last artistic work, _Les Douze Mois_ (1 vol. fol.), was

given to the world. Gavarni was much engaged, during the last period of

his life, in scientific pursuits, and this fact must perhaps be

connected with the great change which then took place in his manner as

an artist. He sent several communications to the Académie des Sciences,

and till his death on the 23rd of November 1866 he was eagerly

interested in the question of aerial navigation. It is said that he made

experiments on a large scale with a view to find the means of directing

balloons; but it seems that he was not so successful in this line as his

fellow-artist, the caricaturist and photographer, Nadar.

Gavarni's _Oeuvres choisies_ were edited in 1845 (4 vols. 4to) with

letterpress by J. Janin, Th. Gautier and Balzac, followed in 1850 by

two other volumes named _Perles et parures_; and some essays in prose

and in verse written by him were collected by one of his biographers,

Ch. Yriarte, and published in 1869. See also E. and J. de Goncourt,

_Gavarni, l'homme et l'oeuvre_ (1873, 8vo). J. Claretie has also

devoted to the great French caricaturist a curious and interesting

essay. A catalogue _raisonné_ of Gavarni's works was published by J.

Armelhault and E. Bocher (Paris, 1873, 8vo).

GAVAZZI, ALESSANDRO (1809-1889), Italian preacher and patriot, was born

at Bologna on the 21st of March 1809. He at first became a monk (1825),

and attached himself to the Barnabites at Naples, where he afterwards

(1829) acted as professor of rhetoric. In 1840, having already expressed

liberal views, he was removed to Rome to fill a subordinate position.

Leaving his own country after the capture of Rome by the French, he

carried on a vigorous campaign against priests and Jesuits in England,

Scotland and North America, partly by means of a periodical, the

_Gavazzi Free Word_. While in England he gradually went over (1855) to

the Evangelical church, and became head and organizer of the Italian

Protestants in London. Returning to Italy in 1860, he served as

army-chaplain with Garibaldi. In 1870 he became head of the Free Church

(_Chiesa libera_) of Italy, united the scattered Congregations into the

"Unione delle Chiese libere in Italia," and in 1875 founded in Rome the

theological college of the Free Church, in which he himself taught

dogmatics, apologetics and polemics. He died in Rome on the 9th of

January 1889.

Amongst his publications are _No Union with Rome_ (1871); _The Priest

in Absolution_ (1877); _My Recollections of the Last Four Popes_, &c.,

in answer to Cardinal Wiseman (1858); _Orations_, 2 decades (1851).

GAVELKIND,[1] a peculiar system of tenure associated chiefly with the

county of Kent, but found also in other parts of England. In Kent all

land is presumed to be holden by this tenure until the contrary is

proved, but some lands have been disgavelled by particular statutes. It

is more correctly described as socage tenure, subject to the custom of

gavelkind. The chief peculiarities of the custom are the following. (1)

A tenant can alienate his lands by feoffment at fifteen years of age.

(2) There is no escheat on attainder for felony, or as it is expressed

in the old rhyme--

"The father to the bough,

The son to the plough."

(3) Generally the tenant could always dispose of his lands by will. (4)

In case of intestacy the estate descends not to the eldest son but to

all the sons (or, in the case of deceased sons, their representatives)

in equal shares. "Every son is as great a gentleman as the eldest son

is." It is to this remarkable peculiarity that gavelkind no doubt owes

its local popularity. Though females claiming in their own right are

postponed to males, yet by representation they may inherit together with

them. (5) A wife is dowable of one-half, instead of one-third of the

land. (6) A widower may be tenant by courtesy, without having had any

issue, of one-half, but only so long as he remains unmarried. An act of

1841, for commuting manorial rights in respect of lands of copyhold and

customary tenure, contained a clause specially exempting from the

operation of the act "the custom of gavelkind as the same now exists and

prevails in the county of Kent." Gavelkind is one of the most

interesting examples of the customary law of England; it was, previous

to the Conquest, the general custom of the realm, but was then

superseded by the feudal law of primogeniture. Its survival in this

instance in one part of the country is regarded as a concession extorted

from the Conqueror by the superior bravery of the men of Kent. _Irish

gavelkind_ was a species of tribal succession, by which the land,

instead of being divided at the death of the holder amongst his sons,

was thrown again into the common stock, and redivided among the

surviving members of the sept. The equal division amongst children of an

inheritance in land is of common occurrence outside the United Kingdom

and is discussed under SUCCESSION.

See INHERITANCE; TENURE. Also Robinson, _On Gavelkind_; Digby,

_History of the Law of Real Property_; Pollock and Maitland, _History

of English Law_; Challis, _Real Property_.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Gassendi, Pierre" to "Geocentric" Volume 11, Slice 5 · 第 14 / 42 题